DOCSLIB.ORG

Agrégation Externe Et Interne D'anglais La Question Du Home Rule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agrégation Externe Et Interne D'anglais La Question Du Home Rule Agrégation externe et interne d’anglais La question du Home Rule (1870-1914) Bibliographie sélective de sources secondaires proposée par Pauline Collombier-Lakeman (Université de Strasbourg) Par souci de concision et parce que le volume de sources primaires existant sur le sujet du Home Rule est considérable (sources manuscrites, débats parlementaires, articles de presse, essais publiés dans divers périodiques, pamphlets, lettres, discours, caricatures de presse, etc.), cette bibliographie est limitée à une sélection de sources secondaires. 1. SÉLECTION D’OUVRAGES GÉNÉRAUX & D’OUTILS DE TRAVAIL 1.1. HISTOIRES GÉNÉRALES COUVRANT LA PÉRIODE ET LES AIRES GÉOGRAPHIQUES CONCERNÉES PAR LA QUESTION: Histoires anglaise, irlandaise, écossaise & galloise : • Bartlett, Th. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Ireland : vol. 4, 1880 to the present. Cambridge : CUP, 2018 (notamment Part I, chapters 2 & 3). • Boyce, D. G. Nineteenth Century Ireland: The Search for Stability. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 1990. • Davies, J. A History of Wales [1993]. Londres: Penguin,1994 (chap. 8). • Devine, T.M., The Scottish Nation: 1700–2000. Londres: Penguin, 1999 (notamment part III, et plus particulièrement chap. 13). • Devine, T.M. & Wormald, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Scottish History. Oxford: OUP, 2012 (notamment part IV, et plus particulièrement chap. 25). • Evans, D. G. A history of Wales, 1815-1906 (series vol. 3). Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1989 (notamment chap. 12 & 13). • Kelly, J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Ireland : vol. 3, 1730-1880. Cambridge: CUP, 2018 (notamment Part VI, chapter 26). • Jackson, A. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Modern Irish History. Oxford : OUP, 2013 (notamment pour l’introduction historiographique de A. Jackson, les articles thématiques de S. Connolly & A. Jackson et l’étude chronologique « Home Rule and Its Enemies » de M. Kelly). • Lyons, F.S.L. Ireland Since the Famine. Londres: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1971. • O’Day, A. The Edwardian Age. Conflict and Stability 1900-1914. Londres: Macmillan (Problems in Focus), 1979. • Searle, G. R. A New England? Peace and War 1886-1918. (The New Oxford History of England). Oxford: OUP, 2004. Histoire de l’Empire : • Bell, D. The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860-1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. • _____. “Ideologies of Empire”, in M. Freeden, L. Tower Sargent & M. Stears, The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: OUP, 2013, 536-61. • Louis, Wm. Roger & Porter, A. (eds), The Oxford History of the British Empire (XIXth Century). Oxford: OUP, 1999 (notably part II). • Louis, Wm. Roger & Brown, Judith (eds), The Oxford History of the British Empire (XXth Century). Oxford: OUP, 1999 (chapters 2 & 3). • Stockwell, Sarah (ed.), The British Empire: Themes and Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008. Vie & partis politiques britanniques : • Adelman, P. The Rise of the Labour Party, 1880-1945. Harlow: Pearson, 1996, 3rd. ed. • Charmley, J. A History of Conservative Politics since 1830. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2008. • Hamer, D. A. Liberal Politics in the Age of Gladstone and Rosebery, A Study in Leadership and Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972. • Hawkins, A. British Party Politics 1852-1886. Londres: Macmillan Press, 1998. • Hoppen, K. T. Elections, Politics and Society in Ireland. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984. • Hutchison, I.G.C., A Political History of Scotland 1832–1924: Parties, Elections and Issues. Edinburgh: John Donald, 1986. • Jenkins, T. A. Parliament, Party and Politics in Victorian Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996. • O’Day, A. (ed.). Government and Institutions in the post-1832 United Kingdom. Lewiston (NY): The Edwin Mellen Press, 1995. • Pugh, M. The Making of Modern British Politics 1867-1945 [1982]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002 (3rd ed). • Searle, G.R. The Liberal Party. Triumph and Disintegration, 1886-1929 (British History in Perspective). Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001 (2nd ed). • Shannon, R. Gladstone: Heroic Minister, 1856-1898. Londres: Penguin, 1999. 1.2 INSTRUMENTS DE TRAVAIL : Dictionnaires : • Stenton, M. (ed.). Who’s Who of British Members of Parliament, A biographical Dictionary of the House of Commons Based on Annual Volumes of Dod’s Parliamentary Companion and Other Sources, vol I.: 1832-1885. Hassocks (Sussex): Harvester Press, 1976. • Stenton, M. & S. Lees (eds.). Who’s Who of British Members of Parliament, A biographical Dictionary of the House of Commons Based on Annual Volumes of Dod’s Parliamentary Companion and Other Sources, vol. II, 1885-1918. Hassocks (Sussex): Harvester Press, 1978. • Oxford Dictionary of National Biography: http://www.oxforddnb.com Quelques repères historiographiques : • Grob-Fitzgibbon, B. J. “The Curious Case of the Vanishing Debate over Irish Home Rule: The Dominion of Canada, Irish Home Rule, and Canadian Historiography”, American Review of Canadian Studies, 45:1 (2015), 113-128. • Harkness, D. “Ireland”, in R. Winks (ed.), The Oxford History of the British Empire: Historiography, vol. 5. Oxford: OUP, 1999, 114-133. • Howe, S. “Minding the Gaps: New Directions in the Study of Ireland and Empire”. Journal of Empire and Commonwealth History, 37, 1 (Mars 2009), 135-49. • O’Day, A. “Home Rule and the Historian”, in D. G. Boyce & A. O’Day (eds.). The Making of Modern Irish History: Revisionism and the Revisionist Controversy. Londres: Routledge, 1996, 141-62 (voir aussi le chapitre de A. Jackson sur l’unionisme dans le même ouvrage). • Lloyd Jones, N (& al). “A New Plea for an Old Subject? Four Nations History for the Modern Period”, in N. Lloyd-Jones & M. M. Scull (eds.), Four Nations Approaches to Modern 'British' History, A (Dis)United Kingdom?, Londres: Palgrave, 2018, 3-31. • Robbins, K., “L'historiographie britannique et la « Britishness »”, Revue d'histoire du XIXe siècle, 37 (2008), 111-26. 2. OUVRAGES PLUS SPÉCIFIQUES, CLASSÉS THÉMATIQUEMENT : 2.1 LES MOUVEMENTS POUR LE HOME RULE Histoire du nationalisme constitutionnel irlandais/Home Rule irlandais • Brennan, E. & S. Gillespie. Nationalism and Unionism: from Union to Partition. Cambridge: CUP, 1996. • Bull, P. “The United Irish League and the Reunion of the Irish Parliamentary Party, 1989-1900”. Irish Historical Studies, XXVI, nº 101 (1988), 51-78. • Chambers, I. “Kilmainham the infamous ‘treaty’ reconsidered”. Australian Journal of Irish Studies, 2 (2002), 48-68. • Collombier-Lakeman, P. “Nationality and Citizenship in the Irish Home Rule Debates of 1886”, Revue française de civilisation britannique, 22:1 (2016). • ____________. “Le « parti nationaliste irlandais » au XIXe siècle : « facteur d'éloignement » et instrument de conquête”, Études irlandaises, 40:1 (2015) 17-28. • Farrell, B. (ed.). The Irish Parliamentary Tradition. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 1973. • Grenfell, M., Home Rule and the Irish Question. Londres: Longman, 1980. • ***Jackson, A. Home Rule, An Irish History, 1800-2000. Londres: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2003. • Jay, R. “Nationalism, Federalism and Ireland “, in M. Forsyth (ed.). Federalism and Nationalism, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1989, 209-22. • Loughlin, J. “The Irish Protestant Home Rule Association and Nationalist Politics, 1886-1893”. Irish Historical Studies, XXIV, nº 95 (1985), 341-60. • **Lyons, F. S. L. The Irish Parliamentary Party, 1890-1910. Londres: Faber & Faber, 1951. • Lyons, F. S. L. “The Two Faces of Home Rule” in K. B. Nowlan (ed.). The Making of 1916: Studies in the History of the Rising. Dublin: The Stationery Office, 1969, 99-127. • McCaffrey, L. J. “The Home Rule Party and Irish Nationalist Opinion, 1874-76”. Catholic Historical Review, XLIII, n° 2 (1957), 160-77. • **______________, “Irish Federalism in the 1870s, a Study in Conservative Nationalism”. American Philosophy Society Transactions, new series, vol. 52, pt. 6 (1962), 1-58. • McConnell, J. “The franchise factor in the defeat of the Irish parliamentary party 1885-1918”. Historical Journal, XLVII, n° 2 (2004), 355-77. • _____________, “The Irish Parliamentary Party in Victorian and Edwardian London” in P. Gray (ed.). Victoria’s Ireland?: Irishness and Britishness, 1837-1901. Dublin: Four Court Press, 2005, 37-50. • Moody, T. W. “The New Departure in Irish Politics, 1878-9”, in H. A. Cronne, T. W. Moody & D. B. Quinn (eds.). Essays in British and Irish History in Honour of James Eadie Todd. Londres: F. Muller, 1949, 303-33. • Morton, G. Home Rule and the Irish Question. Londres: Longman, 1980. • ** Mulvagh, C. The Irish parliamentary party at Westminster, 1900-18. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016. • O’Brien, C. C. “The Machinery of the Irish Parliamentary Party, 1880-85”. Irish Historical Studies, V, n° 17 (1946), 55-85. • *O’ Day, A. The English Face of Irish Nationalism, Parnellite Involvement in British Politics, 1880- 1886. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 1977. • ***___________. Irish Home Rule 1867-1921. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998. • Paseta, S. “Ireland’s last Home Rule generation: the decline of constitutional nationalism in Ireland, 1913-30” in M. Cronin & J. M. Regan (eds.). Ireland: The Politics of Independence 1922- 49. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 13-31. • Thornley, D. “The Irish Home Rule party and parliamentary obstruction, 1874-1887”. Irish Historical Studies, XII, n° 45 (March 1960), 38-57. • **Ward, Alan J. The Irish Constitutional Tradition, Responsible Government and Modern Ireland, 1782-1992. Dublin: Dublin Academic Press, 1994. Histoire du nationalisme constitutionnel écossais /Home Rule écossais • **Finlay, Richard
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liberals in Coalition
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 72 / Autumn 2011 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals in coalition Vernon Bogdanor Riding the tiger The Liberal experience of coalition government Ian Cawood A ‘distinction without a difference’? Liberal Unionists and Conservatives Kenneth O. Morgan Liberals in coalition, 1916–1922 David Dutton Liberalism and the National Government, 1931–1940 Matt Cole ‘Be careful what you wish for’ Lessons of the Lib–Lab Pact Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 72 Autumn 2011 new book from tHe History Group for details, see back page Journal of Liberal History issue 72: Autumn 2011 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Riding the tiger: the Liberal experience of 4 Editor: Duncan Brack coalition government Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Vernon Bogdanor introduces this special issue of the Journal Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Coalition before 1886 10 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, York Membery Whigs, Peelites and Liberals: Angus Hawkins examines coalitions before 1886 Patrons A ‘distinction without a difference’? 14 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Ian Cawood analyses how the Liberal Unionists maintained a distinctive Professor John Vincent identity from their Conservative allies, until coalition in 1895 Editorial Board The coalition of 1915–1916 26 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Prelude to disaster: Ian Packer examines the Asquith coalition of 1915–16, Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard which brought to an end the last solely Liberal government Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
    Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler’s 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy’s fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today’s new and old democracies under siege. Daniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University where he is also a resident fellow of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also currently Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute. His first book, Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (2006) received several prizes from the American Political Science Association. He has written extensively on the emergence of democracy in European political history, publishing in journals such as American Political Science Review, Journal of Economic History, and World Politics.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository
    University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Alastair Paynter (2018) “The emergence of libertarian conservatism in Britain, 1867-1914”, University of Southampton, Department of History, PhD Thesis, pp. 1-187. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES History The emergence of libertarian conservatism in Britain, 1867-1914 by Alastair Matthew Paynter Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2018 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES History Doctor of Philosophy THE EMERGENCE OF LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATISM IN BRITAIN, 1867-1914 by Alastair Matthew Paynter This thesis considers conservatism’s response to Collectivism during a period of crucial political and social change in the United Kingdom and the Anglosphere. The familiar political equipoise was disturbed by the widening of the franchise and the emergence of radical new threats in the form of New Liberalism and Socialism. Some conservatives responded to these changes by emphasising the importance of individual liberty and the preservation of the existing social structure and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberal Unionist Party: a History
    Published on Reviews in History (https://reviews.history.ac.uk) The Liberal Unionist Party: A History Review Number: 1336 Publish date: Thursday, 25 October, 2012 Author: Ian Cawood ISBN: 9781848859173 Date of Publication: 2012 Price: £59.50 Pages: 320pp. Publisher: I. B. Tauris Publisher url: Place of Publication: London Reviewer: Iain Sharpe The split in the Liberal party in 1886 arising from Gladstone’s conversion to the cause of Irish home rule was a turning point in British politics. The Liberals who, in one form or another, had been the dominant party of government over the previous half century spent all but three of the next 20 years in opposition, as the alliance of the breakaway Liberal Unionist party and the Conservatives won landslide victories in three out of four general elections. Given their significant impact on the course of British political history, it is remarkable that, until Dr Cawood’s volume appeared, there was no full-length published study of the Liberal Unionists. There may be a number of explanations for this. Gordon L. Goodman’s 1956 University of Chicago PhD thesis on the Liberal Unionist party may have created a sense that the topic had already been done. Yet Dr Goodman’s work remained unpublished in book form, and is therefore accessible only to more determined scholars of the field. Historians’ fascination with the important and enigmatic figure of Joseph Chamberlain, radical Liberal turned imperialist and Tory ally, may have crowded out study of the party that he helped to found. The fact that the Liberal Unionists were from their inception in alliance with a Conservative party that eventually subsumed them has perhaps relegated the party’s history to a mere subplot in Conservative politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Political Thought in the Age of Home Rule
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: Reid, Colin (2014) 'An Experiment in Constructive Unionism': Isaac Butt, Home Rule and Federalist Political Thought during the 1870s. The English Historical Review, 129 (537). pp. 332-361. ISSN 0013-8266 Published by: Oxford University Press URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceu069 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceu069> This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/16702/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher’s website (a subscription may be required.) 1 ‘An experiment in constructive Unionism’: Isaac Butt, Home Rule and federalist political thought during the 1870s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland's "Trapped" Nationalist Minority, and the Irish Boundary Question, 1921-1925
    WITHOUT A "DOG'S CHANCE:" THE DEVLINITE IRISH NEWS, NORTHERN IRELAND'S "TRAPPED" NATIONALIST MINORITY, AND THE IRISH BOUNDARY QUESTION, 1921-1925 by James A. Cousins Master ofArts, Acadia University 2000 Bachelor ofArts, Acadia University 1997 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Department ofHistory © James A. Cousins 2008 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2008 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission ofthe author. APPROVAL Name: James A. Cousins Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title ofProject: Without a "Dog's Chance:" The Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland's "Trapped" Nationalist Minority, and the Irish Boundary Question, 1921-1925 Examining Committee: Chair Dr. Alexander Dawson, Associate Professor Department ofHistory Dr. John Stubbs, Professor Senior Supervisor Department ofHistory Dr. Wil1een Keough, Assistant Professor Supervisor Department ofHistory Dr. Leith Davis, Professor Supervisor Department ofEnglish Dr. John Craig, Professor Internal Examiner Department ofHistory Dr. Peter Hart, Professor External Examiner Department ofHistory, Memorial University of Newfoundland Date Approved: 11 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Declaration of Partial Copyright Licence The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms. a XER0K Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    72-11430 BRADEN, James Allen, 1941- THE LIBERALS AS A THIRD PARTY IN BRITISH POLITICS, 1926-1931: A STUDY IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1971 History, modern University Microfilms. A XER0K Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan (^Copyright by James Allen Braden 1971 THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE LIBERALS AS A THIRD PARTY IN BRITISH POLITICS 1926-1931: A STUDY IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By James Allen Braden, B. S., M. A. * + * * The Ohio State University 1971 Approved by ment of History PLEASE NOTE: Some Pages haveIndistinct print. Filmed asreceived. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS Sir, in Cambria are we born, and gentlemen: Further to boast were neither true nor modest, Unless I add we are honest. Belarius in Cymbeline. Act V, sc. v. PREFACE In 1927 Lloyd George became the recognized leader of the Liberal party with the stated aim of making it over into a viable third party. Time and again he averred that the Liberal mission was to hold the balance— as had Parnell's Irish Nationalists— between the two major parties in Parlia­ ment. Thus viewed in these terms the Liberal revival of the late 1920's must be accounted a success for at no time did the Liberals expect to supplant the Labour party as the party of the left. The subtitle reads: "A Study in Political Communi­ cation " because communications theory provided the starting point for this study. But communications theory is not im­ posed in any arbitrary fashion, for Lloyd George and his fol­ lowers were obsessed with exploiting modern methods of commu­ nications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forgotten Lib–Con Alliance
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 79 / Summer 2013 / £6.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y A forgotten Lib–Con alliance Alun Wyburn-Powell The Constitutionalists and the 1924 election A new party or a worthless coupon? David Dutton ‘A nasty, deplorable little incident in our political life’ The Dumfries Standard, 1957 David Cloke David Lloyd George: the legacy Meeting report James Fargher The South African war and its effect on the Liberal alliance Kenneth O. Morgan The relevance of Henry Richard The ‘apostle of peace’ Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 79 Summer 2013 Journal of Liberal History Issue 79: Summer 2013 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Liberal history news 4 Editor: Duncan Brack Lloyd George commemorations; plaque to Lord john Russell; Gladstone statue Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl unveiled in Seaforth Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini A forgotten Liberal–Conservative alliance 6 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, The Constitutionalists and the 1924 election – a new party or a worthless York Membery coupon? by Alun Wyburn-Powell Patrons Letters to the Editor 15 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Honor Balfour (Michael Meadowcroft and Hugh Pagan) Professor John Vincent Editorial Board Liberal history quiz 2012 15 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Ian Cawood; Matt Cole; Dr Roy The answers (questions in issue 78) Douglas; Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr ‘A nasty, deplorable little incident in our political 16 Alison Holmes; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Reprints from Mccaffery Irish History Collection
    Article Reprints from McCaffery Irish History Collection AUTHOR YEAR TITLE ORIGINALLY REPRINTED FROM: PAGES (in alphabetical order) PUBLISHED Parnell and the Bradlaugh Irish Historical Studies, p. 212- Arnstein, Walter L. 1963 case v.13:51 235 The Escalation of Insurgency: The The Review of Politics, p. 398- Bell Jr., J. Bowyer Provisional Irish 1973 v.35:3 411 Republican Army's Experience, 1969-1971 The Chroniclers of Violence in Northern The Review of Politics, p. 521- Bell, J. Bowyer 1974 Ireland Revisited: The v.36:4 543 Analysis of Tragedy The Irish Popery Laws: A Study of Eighteenth The Review of Politics, p. 485- Burns, Robert E. 1962 Century Legislation and v.24:4 508 Behavior Letters from the Records of the American Underground: The Fenian Catholic Historical Clark, Dennis 1970 p. 83-88 Correspondence of James Society of Philadelphia, Gibbons v.81:2 Republicanism and Irish. Econ. Soc. Hist., Donnelly Jr., James S. 1984 p. 94-100 Reaction in the 1790's v.11 The Journals of Sir John p. 86- Benn-Walsh Relating to Cork Historical and Donnelly Jr., James S. 123; p. the Management of His Archaeological Society 15-42 Irish Estates, 1823-64 The Rightboys and Donnelly Jr., James S. Agrarian Violence in the ? Typed Manuscript 11 p. (?) Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries The Ecclesiastical Ellis, John Tracy Historian in The Service of 1969 Church History, v.38:1 15 p. Clio The Woman of the House: Irish Studies: Working Fanning, Charles Some Themes in Irish- 1985 135 p. Paper: 85-1/2 American Fiction Thought, Fordham Nationalism: Ireland: A p.
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Realignment and Electoral Arrangement in Britain: the Macdonald-Gladstone Pact of 1903
    Journal of Political Science Volume 9 Number 2 (Spring) Article 3 April 1982 Partisan Realignment and Electoral Arrangement in Britain: The MacDonald-Gladstone Pact of 1903 Hugh W. Stephens Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Stephens, Hugh W. (1982) "Partisan Realignment and Electoral Arrangement in Britain: The MacDonald- Gladstone Pact of 1903," Journal of Political Science: Vol. 9 : No. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops/vol9/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Politics at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Political Science by an authorized editor of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Partisan Realignment and Electoral Arrangement m Britain: The MacDonald-Gladstone Pact of 1903 HUGH W. STEPHENS University of Houston Introduction Elections have been much investigated, and we are well aware that changes in partisan loyalties of major social groups have systemic effects upon the distribution of party power as well as upon other parts of the political system. More especially, we also know that the structure of electoral arrange­ ments, that is, the rules governing how popular votes are translated into legislative representation, can have an independent effect upon the outcome of elections in these same terms . This is apparent in Douglas Rae's comprehensive examination of the various ramifications of electoral laws, such as the ballot form, size of electoral districts, and formulae for distributing legislative seats, in Maurice Duverger's discussion of the effects of proportional representation upon election of Deputies to the French National Assembly, and in the debate between Jerrold Rusk, Philip Converse, and Walter D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of the Third Reform Act on Political Activity and Organization in Industrial Britain, 1886-1906
    Pittsburg State University Pittsburg State University Digital Commons Electronic Thesis Collection Summer 7-26-2019 THE EFFECTS OF THE THIRD REFORM ACT ON POLITICAL ACTIVITY AND ORGANIZATION IN INDUSTRIAL BRITAIN, 1886-1906. Michael S. Vernon Pittsburg State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pittstate.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Vernon, Michael S., "THE EFFECTS OF THE THIRD REFORM ACT ON POLITICAL ACTIVITY AND ORGANIZATION IN INDUSTRIAL BRITAIN, 1886-1906." (2019). Electronic Thesis Collection. 342. https://digitalcommons.pittstate.edu/etd/342 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Pittsburg State University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis Collection by an authorized administrator of Pittsburg State University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECTS OF THE THIRD REFORM ACT ON POLITICAL ACTIVITY AND ORGANIZATION IN INDUSTRIAL BRITAIN, 1886-1906 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of History Michael S. Vernon Pittsburg State University Pittsburg, Kansas July 2019 THE EFFECTS OF THE THIRD REFORM ACT ON POLITICAL ACTIVITY AND ORGANIZATION IN INDUSTRIAL BRITAIN, 1886-1906 Michael S. Vernon APPROVED: Thesis Advisor: __________________________________________________ Dr. Kyle Thompson, Department of History, Philosophy, and Social Sciences Committee Member: _______________________________________________ Dr. Christopher Childers, Department of History, Philosophy, and Social Sciences Committee Member: ________________________________________________ Dr. Mark Peterson, Department of History, Philosophy, and Social Sciences ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Kyle Thompson for guiding and advising me both during this thesis and during my entire career at Pittsburg State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Former Prime Ministers Is a Small A
    Sooner or later, every prime minister becomes a former prime minister, and the ‘club’ of former prime ministers is a tHe aFTERLiVES oF FORMER small and exclusive one. However, over the years, few of its members have left Number 10 Downing LIBERAL PRIMe MINISTERS Street as happy, contented or fulfilled people, or at a time and in a manner of their own choosing. There has been (and there still is) no fixed or established role in public and political life for former prime ministers. What they do after they leave office depends very much on personal choices and on circumstances, including the reaction and attitudes of still- active politicians and of political parties to the former political and governmental leader. There is little in the way of a common pattern. Kevin Theakston looks at the afterlives of five former Liberal prime ministers: Russell, Gladstone, Rosebery, Asquith and Lloyd George. 4 Journal of Liberal History 71 Summer 2011 tHe aFTERLiVES oF FORMER LIBERAL PRIMe MINISTERS t one point, in the (Aberdeen and Palmerston), before they were retiring but, rather, still 1920s, there were, resuming the premiership in 1865. believed they had, and were per- remarkably, three Gladstone had withdrawn from the ceived to have, political futures. former Liberal prime party leadership after the Liber- When Rosebery resigned in ministers alive at the als’ electoral defeat in 1874 and for 1895 he was only forty-eight years Asame time: Lord Rosebery, Asquith a while disengaged from politics old – the youngest former prime and Lloyd George. Before that, Earl (although he did not give up his par- minister there had been for sixty- Russell and Gladstone were Victo- liamentary seat).
    [Show full text]