National Statistics Office of Georgia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Statistics Office of Georgia NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 31.03.2020 1 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 31.03.2020 SUMMARY OF VITAL STATISTICS (BIRTHS, DEATHS, MARRIAGES, DIVORCES, 2019)1 BIRTHS The number of live births equaled 48 296 in 2019 (25 029 boys and 23 267 girls), registering a 5.6 percent decrease from the previous year. TABLE №1 NUMBER OF LIVE BIRTHS BY SEX YEAR BOTH SEXES MALES FEMALES SEX RATIO AT BIRTH 2018 51 138 26 538 24 600 107.9 2019 48 296 25 029 23 267 107.6 In 2019 the largest number of live births was recorded in Tbilisi (16 022) while the smallest – in Racha- Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti Region (284). TABLE №2 NUMBER OF LIVE BIRTHS BY REGIONS REGION 2018 2019 GEORGIA 51 138 48 296 Tbilisi 16 161 16 022 Adjara A.R. 5 800 5 703 Guria 1 272 1 174 Imereti 6 757 6 040 Kakheti 4 159 3 872 Mtskheta-Mtianeti 1 067 946 Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 328 284 Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti 3 972 3 473 Samtskhe-Javakheti 2 107 1 904 Kvemo Kartli 6 179 5 845 Shida Kartli 3 336 3 033 1Not including occupied territories 1 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 31.03.2020 Compared to 2018, in 2019 the share of the first child in total births increased from 37.9 percent to 38.1 percent. The share of the third and next order child increased from 23.6 percent to 24.7 percent, while the share of the second child decreased from 38.2 percent to 36.5. CHART №1 NUMBER OF LIVE BIRTHS BY ORDER 2018 2019 I II III+ NOT STATED Compared to 2018, in 2019 the share of births for women aged less than 25 declined from 31.1 percent to 30.0 percent, while increasing for women aged 40 years and older (from 2.9 percent to 3.8 percent), and remaining almost unchanged for women aged 25-39. 2 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 31.03.2020 CHART №2 NUMBER OF LIVE BIRTHS BY AGE OF MOTHER 2018 2019 -15 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50+ AGE OF MOTHER The mean age of mothers at first birth equaled 25.9 years. 3 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 31.03.2020 DEATHS In 2019 the number of deaths increased by 0.3 percent in annual terms and totaled 46 659 persons. The largest number of deaths was recorded in Tbilisi (12 549) while the smallest – in Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti Region (686). TABLE №3 NUMBER OF DEATHS BY REGIONS REGION 2018 2019 GEORGIA 46 524 46 659 Tbilisi 12 122 12 549 Adjara A.R. 3 438 3 370 Guria 1 691 1 749 Imereti 8 005 8 008 Kakheti 4 529 4 520 Mtskheta-Mtianeti 1 329 1 311 Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 656 686 Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti 4 904 4 874 Samtskhe-Javakheti 1 927 1 945 Kvemo Kartli 4 525 4 372 Shida Kartli 3 398 3 275 According to the 2019 data, infant mortality rate (per 1 000 live births) decreased by 0.2 percentage points and equaled 7.9 ‰. 4 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 31.03.2020 CHART №3 INFANT MORTALITY RATE BY SEX (INFANT DEATHS PER 1 000 LIVE BIRTHS) TOTAL BOYS GIRLS 2018 2019 Similarly, the under-5 mortality rate (per 1 000 live births) in 2019, compared to 2018, de- creased by 0.4 percentage points and totaled 9.4‰. 5 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 31.03.2020 NATURAL INCREASE According to the 2019 data, the natural increase (the difference between the number of live births and the number of deaths) equaled 1 637 decreasing by 64.5 percent year-on-year. Negative natural increase was registered in each region except Tbilisi, Adjara A.R. and Kvemo Kartli. CHART №4 NATURAL INCREASE BY REGIONS SAMEGRELO-ZEMO IMERETI MTSKHETA-MTIANETI SVANETI SHIDA KARTLI RACHA-LECHKHUMI GURIA KAKHETI AND KVEMO SVANETI SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI GEORGIA ADJARA A.R. TBILISI KVEMO KARTLI 2018 2019 6 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 31.03.2020 MARRIAGES2 23 285 marriages have been registered in 2019, showing 0.4 percent increase in comparison to the previous year. The mean age of first marriage in 2019 equals 28.1 years for females and 30.7 years for males. TABLE №4 NUMBER OF REGISTERED MARRIAGES BY REGIONS REGION 2018 2019 GEORGIA 23 202 23 285 Tbilisi 6 718 7 020 Adjara A.R. 2 598 2 382 Guria 665 614 Imereti 3 661 3 888 Kakheti 1 794 1 810 Mtskheta-Mtianeti 500 482 Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 177 211 Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti 2 055 1 943 Samtskhe-Javakheti 921 921 Kvemo Kartli 2 666 2 556 Shida Kartli 1 447 1 458 2The number do not include marriages, when the both spouses are citizens of other countries and at the same time non-usual residents of Georgia 7 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 31.03.2020 DIVORCES The number of divorces in 2019 equaled 11 205 increasing by 8.9 percent compared to the previous year. TABLE №5 NUMBER OF REGISTERED DIVORCES BY REGIONS REGION 2018 2019 GEORGIA 10 288 11 205 Tbilisi 3 898 3 918 Adjara A.R. 761 873 Guria 252 259 Imereti 1 668 2 023 Kakheti 727 842 Mtskheta-Mtianeti 234 232 Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 70 81 Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti 813 1 021 Samtskhe-Javakheti 233 235 Kvemo Kartli 994 1 107 Shida Kartli 638 614 CONTACT PERSONS: Shorena Tsiklauri, Tel.: 2 36 72 10 (601), E-mail: [email protected] Mariam Kavelashvili, Tel.: 2 36 72 10 (020), E-mail: [email protected] 8 www.geostat.ge [email protected].
Recommended publications
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative
    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
    [Show full text]
  • Peasant Oaths, Furious Icons and the Quest for Agency: Tracing
    15 praktyka teoretyczna 1(39)/2021 } LUKA NAKHUTSRISHVILI (ORCID: 0000-0002-5264-0064) Peasant Oaths, Furious Icons and the Quest for Agency: Tracing Subaltern Politics in Tsarist Georgia on the Eve of the 1905 Revolution Part I: The Prose of the Intelligentsia and Its Peasant Symptoms This two-part transdisciplinary article elaborates on the autobiographical account of the Georgian Social-Democrat Grigol Uratadze regarding the oath pledged by protesting peasants from Guria in 1902. The oath inaugurated their mobilization in Tsarist Georgia in 1902, culminating in full peasant self-rule in the “Gurian Republic” by 1905. The study aims at a historical-anthropological assessment of the asymmetries in the alliance formed by peasants and the revolutionary intelligentsia in the wake of the oath as well as the tensions that crystallized around the oath between the peasants and Tsarist officials. In trying to recover the traces of peasant politics in relation to multiple hegemonic forces in a modernizing imperial borderland, the article invites the reader to reconsider the existing assumptions about historical agency, linguistic conditions of subjectivity, and the relation- ship between politics and the material and customary dimen- sions of religion. The ultimate aim is to set the foundations for a future subaltern reading of the practices specific to the peasant politics in the later “Gurian Republic”. The first part of the article starts with a reading of Uratadze’s narration of the 1902 inaugural oath “against the grain”. Keywords: agency, intelligentsia, oath, Orthodox icons, peasantry, political the- ology, Russian Empire, secular studies, speech-act, subaltern praktyka teoretyczna 1(39)/2021 16 I.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobiology of Georgia
    SHOTA TUSTAVELI ZAAL KIKVIDZE NATIONAL SCIENCE FUNDATION ILIA STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS ETHNOBIOLOGY OF GEORGIA ISBN 978-9941-18-350-8 Tbilisi 2020 Ethnobiology of Georgia 2020 Zaal Kikvidze Preface My full-time dedication to ethnobiology started in 2012, since when it has never failed to fascinate me. Ethnobiology is a relatively young science with many blank areas still in its landscape, which is, perhaps, good motivation to write a synthetic text aimed at bridging the existing gaps. At this stage, however, an exhaustive representation of materials relevant to the ethnobiology of Georgia would be an insurmountable task for one author. My goal, rather, is to provide students and researchers with an introduction to my country’s ethnobiology. This book, therefore, is about the key traditions that have developed over a long history of interactions between humans and nature in Georgia, as documented by modern ethnobiologists. Acknowledgements: I am grateful to my colleagues – Rainer Bussmann, Narel Paniagua Zambrana, David Kikodze and Shalva Sikharulidze for the exciting and fruitful discussions about ethnobiology, and their encouragement for pushing forth this project. Rainer Bussmann read the early draft of this text and I am grateful for his valuable comments. Special thanks are due to Jana Ekhvaia, for her crucial contribution as project coordinator and I greatly appreciate the constant support from the staff and administration of Ilia State University. Finally, I am indebted to my fairy wordmother, Kate Hughes whose help was indispensable at the later stages of preparation of this manuscript. 2 Table of contents Preface.......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1. A brief introduction to ethnobiology......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR6658 Implementation Status & Results Georgia Secondary & Local Roads Project (P086277) Operation Name: Secondary & Local Roads Project (P086277) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 16 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 07-Aug-2011 Country: Georgia Approval FY: 2004 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure (RDMRDI) Key Dates Board Approval Date 24-Jun-2004 Original Closing Date 31-Oct-2009 Planned Mid Term Review Date 31-Jul-2007 Last Archived ISR Date 07-Aug-2011 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 21-Oct-2004 Revised Closing Date 30-Jun-2012 Actual Mid Term Review Date 03-Nov-2006 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The Project Development Objectives are to: (i) upgrade and rehabilitate the secondary and local roads network; and (ii) increase Roads Department of the Ministry of regional development and Infrastructure's (RDMRDI's) and local governments' capacity to manage the road network in a cost-effective and sustainable manner. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Rehabilitation of Secondary and Local Roads 118.50 Strengthening the capacity of the Road Sector Institutions 2.70 Designing and Supervising Road Rehabilitation 6.30 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview The implementation progress and overall safeguard compliance of the project is Satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel and Chalets Investment Opportunity at Shaori Lake Racha
    PICTURES OF HOTELS Investment teaser - Hotel and Chalets investment opportunity at Shaori Lake Racha–Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti, Georgia 06 January 2016 Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL OVERVIEW OF RACHA-LECHKHUMI AND KVEMO SVANETI REGION, GEORGIA .......................... 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF RACHA–LECHKHUMI AND KVEMO SVANETI REGION.................................................................................. 5 2 HOTEL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 SHAORI LAKESIDE HOTEL AND SPA AND CHALETS ........................................................................................................... 8 Investment teaser – Hotel investment opportunity at Shaori Lake Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti, Georgia Page 2 1 INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL OVERVIEW OF RACHA-LECHKHUMI AND KVEMO SVANETI REGION, GEORGIA Investment teaser – Hotel investment opportunity at Shaori Lake Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti, Georgia Page 3 1.1 Introduction and Limitations . Upon receipt of a signed copy of the Confidentiality Agreement signed for Partnership Fund, the current leaflet is to represent potential hotel investment opportunity at Shaori Lake in Racha–Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti region. This document contains information in a summarised form and is therefore intended
    [Show full text]
  • National Statistics Office of Georgia
    NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 30.03.2021 1 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 30.03.2021 SUMMARY OF VITAL STATISTICS (BIRTHS, DEATHS, MARRIAGES, DIVORCES, 2020)1 BIRTHS The number of live births equaled 46 520 in 2020 (24 289 boys and 22 231 girls), registering a 3.7 percent decrease from the previous year. TABLE №1 NUMBER OF LIVE BIRTHS BY SEX YEAR BOTH SEXES MALES FEMALES SEX RATIO AT BIRTH 2019 48 296 25 029 23 267 107.6 2020 46 520 24 289 22 231 109.3 In 2020, the largest number of live births was recorded in Tbilisi (15 271) while the smallest – in Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti Region (259). TABLE №2 NUMBER OF LIVE BIRTHS BY REGIONS REGION 2019 2020 48 296 46 520 GEORGIA 16 022 15 271 Tbilisi 5 703 5 599 Adjara A.R. 1 174 1 075 Guria 6 040 5 873 Imereti 3 872 3 828 Kakheti 946 926 Mtskheta-Mtianeti 284 259 Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 3 473 3 286 Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti 1 904 1 912 Samtskhe-Javakheti 5 845 5 530 Kvemo Kartli 3 033 2 961 Shida Kartli 1 Not including occupied territories 1 www.geostat.ge [email protected] NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA 30.03.2021 Compared to 2019, in 2020 the share of the first order births in total live births remained almost unchanged and equaled 38.0 percent. The share of the second child decreased from 36.5 percent to 35.8, while the share of the third and next order births increased from 24.7 percent to 25.8 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Integration and Resettlement: the Meskhetian Turks
    BETWEEN INTEGRATION AND RESETTLEMENT: THE MESKHETIAN TURKS Oskari Pentikäinen and Tom Trier ECMI Working Paper # 21 September 2004 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg Germany ( +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper # 21 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Marc Weller © Copyright 2004 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in August 2004 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) List of Abbreviations.................................................................................................4 I. Introduction...........................................................................................................6 1. Who Are the Meskhetian Turks?...........................................................................9 2. A History of Forced Migration............................................................................11 II. The Meskhetian Turks’ Current Demographic and Socio-Political Situation.......13 1. Georgia...............................................................................................................15 2. Azerbaijan...........................................................................................................19 3. Ukraine...............................................................................................................20 4. Russia..................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019
    Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019 1 Table of Contents List of maps and figures......................................................................................................................3 List of tables ......................................................................................................................................3 List of Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................4 Chapter I. Introduction – background and justification. Geographical Coverage of the Programme .....6 1.1. General background ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Selection of the regions ..................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter II. Socio-economic situation and development trends in the targeted regions .........................9 Chapter ...........................................................................................................................................24 III. Summary of territorial development needs and potentials to be addressed in targeted regions .... 24 Chapter IV. Objectives and priorities of the Programme ................................................................... 27 4.1. Programming context for setting up PIRDP’s objectives and priorities ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • CJSS Second Issue:CJSS Second Issue.Qxd
    Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences The University of Georgia 2009 Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences UDC(uak)(479)(06) k-144 3 Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences EDITOR IN CHIEF Julieta Andghuladze EDITORIAL BOARD Edward Raupp Batumi International University Giuli Alasania The University of Georgia Janette Davies Oxford University Ken Goff The University of Georgia Kornely Kakachia Associate Professor Michael Vickers The University of Oxford Manana Sanadze The University of Georgia Mariam Gvelesiani The University of Georgia Marina Meparishvili The University of Georgia Mark Carper The University of Alaska Anchorage Natia Kaladze The University of Georgia Oliver Reisner The Humboldt University Sergo Tsiramua The University of Georgia Tamar Lobjanidze The University of Georgia Tamaz Beradze The University of Georgia Timothy Blauvelt American Councils Tinatin Ghudushauri The University of Georgia Ulrica Söderlind Stockholm University Vakhtang Licheli The University of Georgia 4 Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences Printed at The University of Georgia Copyright © 2009 by the University of Georgia. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, in any form or any means, electornic, photocopinying, or otherwise, without prior written permission of The University of Georgia Press. No responsibility for the views expressed by authors in the Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences is assumed by the editors or the publisher. Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences is published annually by The University
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Health System Performance Assessment
    1 6 7 8 4 georgia health system performance assessment 2009 georgia health 5 8 7 2 1 9 8 6 5 2 1 7 5 9 3 5 8 3 2 4 1 6 9 8 5 1 3 4 8 2 3 5 8 7 1 2 6 9 8 3 2 3 3 5 1 1 2 4 5 1 9 4 8 6 1 1 2 8 7 4 health georgia system 1performance 3 6 9 5 assessment 1 2 4 7 4 2009 1 2 9 5 3 9 8 7 4 3 health georgia system performance assessment 2009 ABSTRACT This report summarizes the main findings of the World Health Organization (WHO) assessment of the performance of the Georgian health system, which was carried out by the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia, with the technical and financial support from the WHO Regional Office for Europe and from the World Bank. This assessment was carried out between July 2007 and September 2009 and contributes to the efforts pursued by the government of Georgia to strengthen the capacities of the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs for effective stewardship of the health system. This report presents an assessment of the performance of the Georgian health system against a number of key performance dimensions: the health status of the population; the quality of health services and health care outcomes; health promotion and disease prevention policies; equity and financial protection; access to health care services; efficiency and effectiveness of health services; the effective allocation of health system resources; the health information system and the health system stewardship function of the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Short History of Abkhazia and Abkhazian-Georgian Relations
    HISTORY AND CONTROVERSY: SHORT HISTORY OF ABKHAZIA AND ABKHAZIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS Svetlana Chervonnaya (Chapter 2 from the book” Conflict in the Caucasus: Georgia, Abkhazia and the Russian Shadow”, Glastonbury, 1994) Maps: Andrew Andersen, 2004-2007 Below I shall try to give a short review of the history of Abkhazia and Abkhazian-Georgian relations. No claims are made as to an in-depth study of the remote past nor as to any new discoveries. However, I feel it necessary to express my own point of view about the cardinal issues of Abkhazian history over which fierce political controversies have been raging and, as far as possible, to dispel the mythology that surrounds it. So much contradictory nonsense has been touted as truth: the twenty five centuries of Abkhazian statehood; the dual aboriginality of the Abkhazians; Abkhazia is Russia; Abkhazians are Georgians; Abkhazians came to Western Georgia in the 19th century; Abkhazians as bearers of Islamic fundamentalism; the wise Leninist national policy according to which Abkhazia should have been a union republic, and Stalin's pro-Georgian intrigues which turned the treaty-related Abkhazian republic into an autonomous one. Early Times to 1917. The Abkhazian people (self-designation Apsua) constitute one of the most ancient autochthonous inhabitants of the eastern Black Sea littoral. According to the last All-Union census, within the Abkhazian ASSR, whose total population reached 537,000, the Abkhazians (93,267 in 1989) numbered just above 17% - an obvious ethnic minority. With some difference in dialects (Abzhu - which forms the basis of the literary language, and Bzyb), and also in sub- ethnic groups (Abzhu; Gudauta, or Bzyb; Samurzaqano), ethnically, in social, cultural and psychological respects the Abkhazian people represent a historically formed stable community - a nation.
    [Show full text]