CITY PROFILE 2019

To strengthen trust in GOOD GOVERNANCE local authorities, focus on transparent commu- Sievierodonetsk 15 cities* nication of their actions to increase their account- 2.7 2.6 TRUST IN MAYOR OR 2.5 ability and responsive- HEAD OF THE TOWN ness to citizens’ needs. UKRAINIAN ACCOUNTABILITY AUTHORITIES OF AUTHORITIES TRUST IN TOWN Feeling that authorities represent citizens’ 3.1 concerns and views, equally care about all CARE ADMINISTRATION parts of and are ready to listen

LEVEL OF PERCEIVED CORRUPTION AMONG… TRUST IN POLICE 3.9

0 2 4 6 8 10 7.4 7.1 6.9 6.3 Prioritize anti-corruption initiatives, especially 6.1 5.3 among doctors and judges/prosecutors.

DOCTORS JUDGES/ PARLIAMENTA- POLICE TEACHERS LOCAL PROSECUTORS RIANS AUTHORITIES

SOCIAL THREAT FROM 3.4 COMMUNITY BONDS & VALUES DIFFERENT GROUPS Feeling that different socio-demographic groups (i.e. IDPs, people from western Sievierodonetsk 15 cities* and eastern Ukraine, pro-EU etc.) may undermine the unity of their community SOCIAL PROXIMITY COMMUNITY COOPERATION Accepting members of different socio-demographic groups as their close friends and colleagues Feeling that people in their community PEOPLE FROM 7.0 care for each other and cooperate to solve EASTERN UKRAINE common problems

IDPS 6.0

PRO-EU 5.6 ORIENTED PEOPLE

PEOPLE LIVING 5.2 IN THE NGCA

PEOPLE FROM 5.1 WESTERN UKRAINE

ATO/JFO MILITARY 5.1

PRO- 5.0 ORIENTED PEOPLE

0 2 4 6 8 10 Fears of the other often come from stereotypes. Interventions bringing people from different regions and backgrounds together will help break them.

SUPPORT FOR 5.4 Support community/neighbourhood initiatives EUROPEAN VALUES to jointly define and solve common problems. This The belief that European values enrich society and culture way people will feel they can rely on each other.

* CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: , , , , Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, , , , Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, , . Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city). among 15 cities among 15 cities LOCALITY SATISFACTION SATISFACTION WITH CITY LIFE (in terms of jobs, leisure activities 5.9 5.8 and raising children)

Sievierodonetsk 15 cities*

SAFETY & SECURITY SENSE OF BELONGING TO YOUR

POLITICAL SECURITY SETTLEMENT Freedom to express 5.0 political opinions ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY 4.9 Satisfied with the state of environment and air quality ECONOMIC SECURITY Being able to provide 4.8 for your family PERSONAL SECURITY Feeling safe on the streets 4.5 and protected by the police 0 2 4 6 8 10

SERVICES & EMPLOYMENT

FEAR OF ECONOMIC 6.3 INSTABILITY

PROVISION OF PUBLIC 6.3 SERVICES

PROVISION OF 5.8 INFRASTRUCTURE

EMPLOYMENT 3.8 OPPORTUNITIES Organize cultural events (street food/music festivals,

0 2 4 6 8 10 art performances etc.) to build a positive perception of the city. PRIDE IN YOUR LOCALITY

When you think about your locality, to what extent are you proud of the following?

PRIDE IN To boost pride in locality, FAMOUS PEOPLE 6.4 LOCALITY (OVERALL) prioritize interventions that strengthen community bonds. NATURE 6.0 4.8 6.2

CUISINE 5.7

CULTURAL HERITAGE 5.6 CIVIC BEHAVIOUR

TRADITIONS 5.5 To change 46 % ACTIVE things in your Willing to use political and social means community you of action without violence HOSPITALITY 5.3 are... 2 % VIOLENT CREATIVITY 5.0 Willing to use violence

52 % PASSIVE INDUSTRY AND 3.1 PRODUCTION Not willing to do anything

COMMUNITY BONDS 2.8 To motivate passive citizens, concentrate on small SAFETY AND 2.8 scale civic initiatives relevant to their sense of pride SECURITY that bring immediate benefit to the community. 0 2 4 6 8 10

* CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, Kramatorsk, Lysychansk, Sloviansk, Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, Starobilsk, Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE Popasna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, Melitopol, Berdyansk. among 15 cities among 15 cities A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city).

City profiles are part ofthe SCORE for Eastern Ukraine 2019 project funded by the USAID, implemented by the Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development (SeeD), and in partnership with the UN Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme. The contents of this research do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government or UN. For more information, please visit www.scoreforpeace.org