Arxiv:2010.15719V3 [Quant-Ph] 22 Feb 2021 2 2 Detector
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PHYSICAL REVIEW A 103, 022219 (2021) Multipath wave-particle duality with a path detector in a quantum superposition Mohd Asad Siddiqui ∗ Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610051, China. Tabish Qureshi y Centre for Theoretical Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India. According to Bohr's principle of complementarity, a quanton can behave either as a wave or a particle, depending on the choice of the experimental setup. Some recent two-path interference experiments have devised methods where one can have a quantum superposition of the two choices, thus indicating that a quanton may be in a superposition of wave and particle natures. These experiments have been of interest from the point of view of Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment. However, it has also been claimed that this experiment can violate complementarity. Here we theo- retically analyze a multipath interference experiment that has a which-path detector in a quantum superposition of being present and absent. We show that a tight multipath wave-particle duality relation is respected in all such situations, and complementarity holds well. The apparent violation of complementarity may be due to incorrect evaluation of path distinguishability in such scenarios. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.022219 I. INTRODUCTION D2 The discourse of wave-particle duality has always at- tracted attention from the early days of quantum me- mirror D1 chanics. It is believed that it lies at the heart of quantum mechanics [1]. It was understood from the beginning that the object exhibits both wave and particle natures. Ob- BS2 jects showing both wave and particle natures are often Single called quantons [2]. It was Bohr who first pointed out photon BS1 that both properties are mutually exclusive and formu- mirror lated it as a principle of complementarity [3]. Wootters Phase and Zurek [4] revisited Bohr's complementarity principle shifter from the information-theoretic approach, looking at two- slit interference in the presence of a path detector, and FIG. 1. Schematic diagram to illustrate a typical interfer- found that simultaneous observation of both natures is ence experiment with a quantum which-path device BS2. The possible with the proviso that the more you observe one, beam-splitter BS2 is in a superposition of being present in the the more it will obscure the other. Later, Greenberger path of the photon and being away from it. and Yasin [5] formulated a quantitative bound in terms of the predictability and fringe visibility. The predictability was defined as a priori information i.e., it tells one the detector due to destructive interference. In this situation, difference between probabilities of going through differ- it is logical to believe that the photon follows both paths, ent paths. Englert [6] proposed a stronger path quanti- which later interfere. If the second beam-splitter is re- fier which was based on a posteriori path information ac- moved, photons from one path can only reach a particular quired using a path detector, and derived a bound on the arXiv:2010.15719v3 [quant-ph] 22 Feb 2021 2 2 detector. So it is logical to assume that each photon de- path distinguishability and fringe visibility, D + V ≤ 1. tected by any detector came from only one path and not This relation, generally called the wave particle duality both. So the presence of the second beam-splitter makes relation, is understood to be a quantitative statement of the photons behave as a wave, following both paths, and Bohr's principle. Of late the concept of wave particle in its absence they behave like particles, following only duality has been generalized to multipath interference one path at a time. Wheeler introduced an idea that if [7{11]. the choice of removing or retaining the beam-splitter is In a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, it is understood made after the photon has traversed most of its path, that in the balanced mode, only one of the detectors reg- one can affect the past of the particle in the sense of isters all the photons, and no photons arrive at the other making sure, even after a delay, that the photons behave like a wave or like a particle [12]. This \delayed choice" idea has been a subject of debate for a long time. Some ∗ [email protected] years back, a proposal was made by Ionicioiu and Terno y [email protected] [13] suggesting that the second beam-splitter could be a 1 2 quantum beam-splitter (QBS), such that it is in a quan- and the QPD in a superposition of being present and ab- tum superposition of being present and absent (see Fig. sent. The interaction can be represented by a controlled 1). The idea was that this would force the photon to unitary operation, U. The combined state of quanton be in a superposition of wave and particle natures. This and QPD, after the quanton has traversed the paths and \quantum delayed choice" experiment, with a quantum interacted with the QPD, can be written as beam-splitter immediately became a subject of attention, n n and many experimental and theoretical studies were car- X p X p ried out [14{19]. jΨi = c1 pi j iijdii jY i + c2 pi j ii jd0ijNi: Apart from the obvious relevance of this new class of i=1 i=1 experiments to Wheeler's delayed choice idea, there have (4) been speculations that the superposition of wave and par- ticle natures might violate complementarity. In particu- The first term in the above equation represents the quan- lar, some claims of exceeding the bound set by the two- ton states entangled with the internal states of the QPD, path duality relation of the kind D2 + V2 ≤ 1 have been when the QPD is present in the path of the quanton, made [15]. In this paper, we investigate the issue of wave i.e., it is in the state jY i. Here path information of the particle duality in the more general scenario of n-path quanton is encoded in the jdii states of the QPD, and the interference, where the path detector is in a quantum quanton behaves as a particle. The second term repre- superposition of being present and absent. sents the pure state of the quanton in a superposition of n paths, acting like a wave, and the QPD away from its path, in the state jNi. The state (4) can be written as II. WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY IN c1jparticleijY i+c2jwaveijNi, and represents a superposi- MULTIPATH INTERFERENCE tion of particle nature and wave nature, with amplitudes c1 and c2, respectively. It is the most natural generaliza- A. Duality relation for pure quanton and quantum tion of the wave and particle superposition states studied path detector earlier (without a QPD) [14{19], to the case where there is a real QPD present. A similar state has also been used Consider an n-path interference experiment (see Fig. in a very recent work using a QPD [20]. It may be conve- 2) with pure initial quanton state nient to use the density operator formalism if one wants to generalize the analysis to mixed states. The density n X p operator for the state (4), is given by j ini = pi j ii; (1) i=1 n X p y ρQD = pipj j iih jj ⊗ Uijφ0ihφ0jUj ; (5) where pi is the probability of acquiring the ith path and i;j=1 j ii forms an orthonormal basis. We use a quantum path detector (QPD) to detect the where U jφ i = c jd ijY i + c jd ijNi. path acquired by a quanton. There are two degrees of i 0 1 i 2 0 freedom associated with it. One is its location, which The above interaction creates entanglement between is assumed to have two states, jY i corresponding to it the quanton and path detector. Thus, for gaining knowl- being present in the paths of the quantum and jNi cor- edge of the path of the quanton, it is sufficient to do responding to be being absent from the path. The other a measurement on the states jdii of the QPD. Here we will use the unambiguous quantum state discrimination degree of freedom is its internal state denoted by jdii, which corresponds to it detecting the path of the quan- (UQSD) method for gaining the path information [7,8]. For wave information we will use l1 norm measure of ton. Initially, the QPD is assumed to be in the state jd0i, and if the quanton goes through the kth path, the QPD coherence [8, 21, 22]. Let us now look at the path distin- guishability and the measure of coherence. state changes to jdki. So the full initial detector state is given by Path distinguishability: Based on UQSD, the path- distinguishability for n-path interference [7,8], is given jφ0i = jd0i (c1 jY i + c2 jNi) ; (2) by where c1 is the amplitude of QPD presence and c2 the 1 X p 2 2 D := 1 − p p jhφ jU yU jφ ij amplitude of its absence; c1+c2 = 1. The state represents Q n − 1 i j 0 j i 0 the QPD being in a superposition of the two locations. i6=j Initially, the joint state of quanton and QPD is given 1 X p = 1 − p p c2 jhd jd ij + c2 : (6) by n − 1 i j 1 j i 2 i6=j n X p jΨini = j inijφ0i = pi j iijd0i (c1 jY i + c2 jNi) ; (3) It is essentially the maximum probability with which the i=1 states Uijφ0i can be unambiguously distinguished from which denotes a pure state of the quanton with amplitude each other.