DOCSLIB.ORG

ASU Reviewed 8/12/2020 NONREIMBURSABLE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ASU Reviewed 8/12/2020 NONREIMBURSABLE NASA OGC Reviewed 8/11/2020; ASU Reviewed 8/12/2020 NONREIMBURSABLE SPACE ACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY / INSTITUTE OF HUMAN ORIGINS (ASU IHO) AND THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) FOR THE LUCY IN SPACE CONTEST ARTICLE 1. AUTHORITY AND PARTIES In accordance with the National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113(e)), this Agreement is entered into by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, located at 300 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20546 (hereinafter referred to as “NASA”) and the Arizona Board of Regents for and on behalf of Arizona State University and its Institute of Human Origins, located at 951 South Cady Mall, Social Sciences #103, PO Box 874101, Tempe, AZ 85287-4101 (hereinafter referred to as “ASU IHO” or “Partner”). NASA and Partner may be individually referred to as a “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.” ARTICLE 2. PURPOSE The purpose of this agreement (“Agreement”) is to set forth the terms and conditions under which the Parties will cooperate in the conduct of the Lucy in Space Contest for grades 6–12, wherein U.S. students nationwide will be prompted to submit patch designs along with an essay describing their design (grades 6–8) or artwork/media and an essay/poem describing their art (grades 9–12) (the “Contest”). The Contest is intended to engage middle school through high school students in the human drive to explore, discover, and acquire knowledge about our origins and our place in the natural world on Earth, as epitomized by the Lucy fossil, and in the Solar System, as epitomized by the NASA Lucy Mission. NASA views such contests as opportunities that further its objectives to inform the public and distribute knowledge gained from the space program to a broad audience. NASA seeks to engage U.S. students in the engineering and scientific enterprise behind space exploration in furtherance of national goals to stimulate interest in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. The NASA Lucy Mission to the Jupiter Trojan asteroids was named in honor of the 3.2-million-year-old human ancestor fossil “Lucy,” discovered by Donald Johanson, Founding Director of IHO. The Parties believe that by engaging students in a contest connecting the human ancestor “Lucy” and the exploration of some of the oldest objects in the Solar System—the Trojan Asteroids or “fossils of the Solar System”—they will understand more about the science of our origins and our place in the Solar System. This Contest, supporting and identifying applicable Next Generation Science Standards, will engage students in our connection to science, engineering, and technology. The themes of exploration and discovery will show students how they are connected to humankind’s history and their future as well. Because such contests draw considerable public interest, the process of registering, sorting, evaluating, and judging entries is labor intensive and requires careful consideration of entries and feedback to entrants. At the same time, such contests present excellent opportunities to engage the interest of young Americans in space science and exploration, its objectives, and the advances it produces in science, math, engineering, and technology, and knowledge in general. ASU IHO believes there is a societal benefit in generating students’ interest in STEM through real-life challenges. ASU IHO knows that connecting the NASA Lucy Mission to students across the country will help inspire the next generation of STEM talent to ensure our nation is able to support scientific research throughout the 21st Century. 1 NASA OGC Reviewed 8/11/2020; ASU Reviewed 8/12/2020 While ASU IHO recognizes the extraordinary public awareness and interest the Contest will generate, ASU IHO knows the true value is in the science, research, and discovery that the NASA Lucy Mission represents and the curiosity it inspires. ARTICLE 3. RESPONSIBILITIES A. ASU IHO will use reasonable efforts to: 1. In coordination with NASA, design, conduct, and manage the Contest to collect, evaluate, select, and deliver to NASA a mission patch design and essay/poem (grades 6–8) and message/artwork and essay/poem (grades 9–12), and the associated nomination materials (submitted content, student name, student grade, student school, if applicable, and student hometown) submitted by the students. 2. Coordinate with NASA on all matters pertaining to Contest publicity and news coverage and adhere to NASA’s Media Usage Guidelines (https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/guidelines/index.html). 3. To the extent of existing networks, broadly disseminate information regarding the existence of, and promote participation in, the Contest. 4. Offer the Contest to eligible students who, in the Fall of 2020, will be in grades 6–12 in the U.S. (including U.S. territories and schools operated by the U.S. for the children of American personnel overseas), except dependents of employees directly affiliated with NASA, ASU IHO, the Partner’s organizations/companies, additional partnering organizations/companies involved in the selection of finalists, and their immediate families. 5. In coordination with additional partnering organizations/companies, provide NASA details on the Contest on a monthly basis from one month prior to the Contest launch date, October 16, 2020, through May 14, 2021, the date the winners will be announced, consisting of: a. The number of schools, teachers, and students registered for the Contest b. Number of potentially eligible entrants from each school/city/state in each judging category (as determined by grade level) c. Post-selection plan for making any awards or prizes d. Overall status of the project and milestones 6. In coordination with additional partnering organizations/companies, provide NASA with the recommended ten (10) patch designs and essays (grades 6–8) and ten (10) artwork/media and essay/poem (grades 9–12) (finalists), the associated, necessary student submission materials (submitted essay/poem/artwork/media, student name, student grade, student school, if applicable, and student hometown), and rationale for their selection, including; a. A statement from the students (or parents as applicable) who submitted the twenty (20) proposed essay/poem/artwork/media that they are not ineligible to enter the contest because they are dependents of employees of NASA, ASU IHO, the Partner’s organizations/companies, additional partnering organizations/companies or their immediate families; and waivers from the parents/guardians of the students who submitted the twenty (20) proposed essay/poem or artwork/media, stating that the submitted essay/poem or artwork/media shall become the property of the Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University. b. Partner hereby provides NASA with a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide 2 NASA OGC Reviewed 8/11/2020; ASU Reviewed 8/12/2020 license to use the submitted essays/poems or artwork/media described above for informational purposes in sharing information about NASA’s involvement in the Contest and this Agreement, and to permit others to do the same. In the event the submitted essay/poem or artwork/media makes any use of NASA program identifiers, including the NASA Insignia or the NASA Logotype, Partner’s use of such essay/poem or artwork/media shall be subject to the provisions of Article 12. c. Publicity and information releases of the students who submitted the twenty (20) proposed essay/poem or artwork/media, including any student information and/or education programs to be used for publicity. 7. Curate age-appropriate, standards-aligned educational curriculum and materials, including publicly available NASA materials, to support and complement the Contest. 8. Participate in a scheduled monthly status teleconference with NASA. 9. Preserve and deliver relevant data on the numbers of entries received and the locations in the U.S. or its territories from which entries are received. 10. Protect any personally-identifiable information of the Contest participants as prudent and required by law. 11. Recognize student submissions at a variety of Contest gates (e.g. finalist, winner). This may, but is not required to, include a certificate of participation, a signed NASA Lucy Mission photo, and/or a plaque or Lucy model. B. NASA will use reasonable efforts to: 1. Provide feedback, scientific expertise, and cooperation on the Contest, including: a. Access to publicly available imagery, artwork, and archival material for announcing and implementing the Contest; b. Web links from relevant NASA website(s) to the Contest website to be established by the Partner; c. Contest notification to teachers and students via appropriate e-mail lists maintained by NASA; and d. Opportunities, in NASA’s discretion and as opportunities may arise, for Partner to interview key individuals associated with the creation and development of the Lucy spacecraft and instruments. 2. Coordinate with the Partner on all matters pertaining to Contest publicity and news coverage. 3. Participate in a scheduled monthly status teleconference with Partner. 4. Protect any personally-identifiable information of the Contest participants which is submitted to NASA by Partner upon NASA’s request. 5. Review the ASU IHO waiver agreement template described in Article 3, Paragraph A.6.a., which agreement shall permit the license to NASA described in Article 3, Paragraph A.6.b. 6. Review the selected final essays/poems or artwork/media prior to the launch of the mission. 7. Public health conditions permitting, provide invitations to view the launch of the NASA Lucy Mission at Kennedy Space Center to the Partner, Contest judges, the families of the finalists and winners of the Contest, and the teachers of the finalists and winners. Note the invitation to view the launch does not provide any travel or pay any other costs of attending the event to those invited. 3 NASA OGC Reviewed 8/11/2020; ASU Reviewed 8/12/2020 ARTICLE 4. MILESTONES The planned major milestones for the activities for this Agreement defined in the “Responsibilities” Article are as follows, in line with the NASA Lucy Mission.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • {Download PDF} from Lucy to Language Revised, Updated, And
    FROM LUCY TO LANGUAGE REVISED, UPDATED, AND EXPANDED 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Donald C Johanson | 9780743280648 | | | | | From Lucy to Language Revised, Updated, and Expanded 1st edition PDF Book In this section the authors provide answers to the basics -- "What are our closest living relatives? Instead, the hominid fossil record suggests that our ancestry is better thought of as a bush, with the branches representing a number of bipedal species that evolved along different evolutionary lines. Evidence for Bipedalism Wren rated it really liked it Sep 19, This discovery prompted a complete reevaluation of previous evidence for human origins. The paleoanthropologist one who studies ancient humans works closely with scientific colleagues to raise funding to support field projects, with a primary expectation being the recovery of the fossilized remains of our ancestors. Like no species before us, we now seem poised to control vast parts of the planet and its life. The Early Human Fossil Record6. In the years since this dramatic discovery Johanson has continued to sco In in a remote region of Ethiopia, Donald Johanson, then one of America's most promising young paleoanthropologists, discovered "Lucy", the oldest, best preserved skeleton of any erect-walking human ever found. In Part II the authors profile over fifty of the most significant early human fossils ever found. In Part II the authors profile over fifty of the most significant early human fossils ever found. Thank you for signing up, fellow book lover! More books from this author: Donald Johanson. It is a combination of the vital experience of field work and the intellectual rigor of primary research.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucy: Ethiopia's Star Skeleton
    LESSON 4 Lesson Plans Lucy: Ethiopia’s Star Skeleton Context: Lucy, the skeleton of an early human ancestor, Australopithecus afarensis, was found in the Western Afar Rift, Ethiopia, in Africa. The archaeologists who found Lucy’s remains named her after a popular song. Annotations and Notes How did one of Ethiopia’s most famous “residents” come to be fossil: remains or traces of named after a Beatles’ song? It all began on November 30, 1974. It an organism turned to stone started out the same as any other day at Hadar, an archaeological by geochemical processes site in Ethiopia. Paleontologists Tom Gray and Donald Johanson surveying: an act of were exploring an area where they had found fossils before. As measuring and examining an they walked along, surveying the area, Johanson happened to area of land notice a small, broken piece of bone sticking out of the ground. As preserve: to keep he examined it, Johanson realized that the bone was anatomically (something) in its original similar to a human bone. As the two men continued to search state or in good condition the area, they realized that they had found about 40 percent of a geologist: a person who skeleton, and one that was very well preserved. studies rocks, layers of soil, etc., in order to learn about When they returned to collect and map the hundreds of pieces of the history of the Earth and the skeleton, a team of geologists and paleontologists realized its life that these bones belonged to a hominid that was approximately paleontologist: a person 3.18 million years old and, based on the size of the bones, female.
    [Show full text]
  • Australopithecus Afarensis: Lucy and Her Relatives Her Relatives Were Very Early Forms of Humans
    Australopithecus Afarensis: Lucy and her Relatives her relatives were very early forms of humans. One discovery about Lucy was In 1974, an American paleoanthropologist (studies ancient peoples) ​ named Donald Johanson discovered a partial skeleton while searching especially exciting. By studying her for artifacts under a hot African sun. skeleton, scientists found out that she After careful study, Johanson determined that the bones had come was a biped, which means she had the from a female hominid who had lived more than 3 million years ago. ability to walk on two feet. This gave She is one of the earliest hominids ever discovered. Johanson Lucy and her relatives many advantages nicknamed her “Lucy.” compared with animals such as gorillas An anthropologist in Africa called the earliest known group of and chimpanzees. With their hands free, hominids Australopithecus (aws-tray-loh-PIH-thuh-kuhs), a Latin word the hominids could gather and carry ​ ​ meaning “southern ape.” Donald Johanson called Lucy's group food more easily. They could also use Australopithecus Afarensis. The second part of this name refers to the their hands to defend themselves and ​ Afar Triangle, the part of Africa where Lucy was found. their children. Through their studies of Lucy, Scientists have learned a lot about This biped trait was one key way in early hominids. By assembling her bones, they know something about which Lucy resembled us. But in other what she looked like. Lucy was short compared with humans today – ways, hominids like Lucy were quite between 3 and 4 feet tall. She had a mix of ape and human features.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Hominids
    CHAPTER 4 Humans living 2 million years ago shaped stone and animal bones into simple tools. Early Hominids 2.1 Introduction In Chapter 1, you explored cave paintings made by prehistoric humans. Scientists call these prehistoric humans hominids. In this chapter, you will learn about five important groups of hominids. You've already met three kinds of "history detectives"—archeologists, historians, and geographers. The study of hominids involves a fourth type, paleoanthropologists. Anthropologists study human development and culture. Paleoanthropologists specialize in studying the earliest hominids. (Paleo means "ancient") In 1974, an American paleoanthropologist, Donald Johanson, made an exciting discovery. He was searching for artifacts under a hot African sun when he found a partial skeleton. The bones included a piece of skull, a jawbone, a rib, and leg bones. After careful study, Johanson decided the bones came from a female hominid who lived more than 3 million years ago. He nicknamed her "Lucy" while he was listening to the song "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds," by the Beatles. She is one of the earliest hominids ever discovered. What have scientists found out about Lucy and other hominids? How were these hominids like us? How were they different? What capabilities, or skills, did each group have? Let's find out. 4 million 3 million 2 million 1 million years a.c.t years B.C.E. years B.C.E. years B.C.E. Homo sapiens ntandarthmlansis Ufa Australopithecus afirensis Use this timeline as a graphic organizer to help you study five groups of hominids. Early Hominids 13 2.2 Australopithecus Afarensis: anthropologist a scientist Lucy and Her Relatives who studies human develop- Traditionally, scientists have given Latin names to groups of ment and culture living things.
    [Show full text]
  • Discoverer of Lucy Skeleton Hopes to Find What Made Us Human 4 November 2014, by Deborah Netburn, Los Angeles Times
    Discoverer of Lucy skeleton hopes to find what made us human 4 November 2014, by Deborah Netburn, Los Angeles Times paleoanthropology and what he hopes to find next. Q: Before Lucy, what was the accepted narrative of human evolution? A: In the early 1970s when I first went into the field, there was a tug-of-war going on between Europe and Africa. Most people thought our most primitive origins were in Africa, but where we really became human was Europe. Q: How did the discovery of Lucy change that? A: She shifted, very dramatically, anthropologists' view of where we obtained our human features. She showed us it happened in Eastern Africa, and more specifically in the Afar region of Ethiopia where she was found. She also allowed us to say conclusively that upright walking went back as much as 3.5 million A reconstruction of a female Australopithecus afarensis. years. That was a major leap in our understanding Image: Wikimedia Commons. of the sequence of events of human evolution. Q: How do you know she walked upright? This month marks the 40th anniversary of the A: Because we had her pelvis. It's a very rare discovery of Lucy, the partial skeleton of an apelike discovery to find a pelvis, and hers is so strikingly creature that walked upright 3.5 million years ago. different from the pelvis of a four-legged animal like The 1974 find would forever change humanity's a chimp. A four-legged animal has a high narrow understanding of where our species came from pelvis with the hip bones facing forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucy Discoverer on the Ancestor People Relate to Donald Johanson Reflects on the Enduring Charisma of the Australopithecus Afarensis Fossil He Found 40 Years Ago
    NATURE | NEWS: Q&A Lucy discoverer on the ancestor people relate to Donald Johanson reflects on the enduring charisma of the Australopithecus afarensis fossil he found 40 years ago. Ewen Callaway 21 November 2014 Morton Beebe/Corbis Donald Johanson with Lucy in a 1982 picture. “Feeling really lucky,” Donald Johanson wrote in his diary the morning of 24 November 1974, while staying at a remote camp in northern Ethiopia’s Afar region. Hours later, the palaeoanthropologist, now at Arizona State University in Tempe, happened upon the 3.2-million-year-old remains of a small-bodied early human, possibly on the lineage that gave rise to Homo sapiens. He and his collaborators named it Australopithecus afarensis, and the skeleton became known to the world as Lucy. Forty years on, Johanson, now 71, talks about the discovery and Lucy’s enduring importance and appeal. What did scientists know about early human evolution before Lucy? Before my discoveries at the site of Hadar in Ethiopia, we had relatively few fossil species, and only a handful that were as old as 3 million years: There was a piece of arm, a single tooth, a chunk of jaw and maybe a bit of skull. But we didn't have any idea of what early hominids looked like. What took you to Ethiopia in the early 1970s? A young geologist by the name of Maurice Taieb [who is now director of research at the European Centre of Research and Teaching of Geosciences of the Environment in Aix-en-Provence, France] had been exploring the Afar region, and during the course of that preliminary work in the late 1960s, he encountered large areas that were very fossil-rich.
    [Show full text]
  • Australopithecus Afarensis
    Ramsaday college Australopithecus afarensis Australopithecus afarensis (Latin: "Southern ape from Afar") is an extinct hominin that lived between 3.9 and 2.9 million years ago in Africa. A. afarensis was slenderly built and is thought to be more closely related to the genus Homo (which includes the modern human species Homo sapiens), whether as a direct ancestor or a close relative of an unknown ancestor, than any other known primate from the same time. A. afarensis existed between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago. The species is one of the better-known australopithecines, merely with regard to the number of samples attributed to the species. The species was named by D. Johanson and T. White in 1978. Key fossil discoveries During the 1970s, two fossil hunting teams began uncovering evidence of ancient human ancestors in east Africa. One team, co-led by Donald Johanson, was working at Hadar in Ethiopia. The other team led by Mary Leakey, was over 1,500 kilometres away at Laetoli in Tanzania. Fossils discovered at the two sites were found to have very similar features and ages but they did not match the fossils of any species known at that time. A new species name, Australopithecus afarensis, was therefore created for them in 1978. A number of fossils of this type have been discovered at different times (between 1975- 1991) by Johanson, Johanson and Gray, Abell, and Kimbell and Rak from different places of east Africa like Hadar (Ethiopia) and Laetoli (Tanzania). Of these fossil remains, the one, a 3.2 million years old partial skeleton, discovered in November 1974 at Hadar, Ethiopia, Possibly the best-known specimen of afarensis is AL 288–1.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO IS LUCY? > Lesson Overview
    WHO IS LUCY? > Lesson Overview Overview: In this lesson, you will be introduced to “Lucy”, one of the most famous fossils ever found. You’ll learn details about Lucy including her relationship to humans, her diet, her appearance, and her form of locomotion. Then, you will apply your knowledge in the activities that follow. Objectives: To understand the impact of Lucy’s discovery on the study of human evolution. To understand the significance of identifying bipedalism within the fossil record. To become familiar with aspects of the human fossil record. Outline: A. An Introduction to Lucy B. Lucy in Context C. Lucy and Bipedalism D. Conclusions E. Activity: The Science of Lucy F. Review Questions G. References H. Answer Key Strategy: You will use known elements of Lucy’s morphology to identify primitive and derived characteristics, including bipedalism. You will hypothesize the evolutionary relationship between Lucy’s species and modern humans. You will apply what you learn about Lucy to the activity below. Required Materials: Pen or pencil, colored pencils or pens, a straight edge such as a ruler, and copies of sections A-G of this lesson. Expected Classroom Hours: 1 hr (Assigning the reading outside of class may reduce total classroom hours). Suggested Supplemental Lessons or Resources: eLucy Comparative Anatomy On the Track of Prehistoric Humans Hominin Evolution: Genera Australopithecus and Parathropus eSkeletons eFossils or eLucy Glossary Page 1 of 26 ©eFOSSILS.org Last revised 21 December 2011 WHO IS LUCY? > A. An Introduction to Lucy The discovery of Lucy On November 24, 1974, Donald Johanson and his student Tom Gray were surveying a site named Hadar in the Afar region of Ethiopia, East Africa (shown right) when they noticed a bone jutting out of the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EVOLUTION of BIPEDALISM > Lesson Overview - Intermediate & Advanced
    STEP BY STEP: THE EVOLUTION OF BIPEDALISM Lesson Overview - Intermediate & Advanced > Overview: Bipedalism is a defining characteristic of modern humans that evolved over millions of years. Therefore, identifying evidence for bipedalism in the fossil record can help determine what selective pressures may have affected human evolution. This lesson examines the significance of bipedalism, anatomical adaptations exhibited by hominins, and discusses possible climatic influences on bipedal evolution. Students should have a basic understanding of osteology (i.e. skeletal anatomy). Objectives: To understand the significance of identifying bipedal evidence within the fossil record. To learn the morphological adaptations associated with bipedalism. To become familiar with the environmental and behavioral pressures that may have affected bipedal locomotion. Outline: A. Introduction to Bipedalism B. Anatomical Evidence for Bipedalism C. Fossil and Geologic Evidence D. Conclusions E. Activity: Bipedalism Features Chart F. Activity: Brain vs. Bipedalism G. Review Questions H. References I. Answer Key Strategy: You will identify the fossil evidence for the evolution of bipedalism You will hypothesize about the evolutionary pressures affecting bipedal behavior You will familiarize yourself with the adaptations necessary for habitual, or obligate bipedalism. Required Materials: Pen, pencil, digital calipers (or ruler), life-size cast of human cranium (if available), copies of attached sections A-H of this lesson. Expected classroom hours: 2 hrs (Assigning reading as homework will decrease classroom hours). Suggested Supplemental Lessons or Resources: On the Track of Prehistoric Humans Human Evolution: Genera Australopithecus and Parathropus Who is Lucy? eFossils Lesson eSkeletons.org eFossils.org or eLucy.org Glossary Page 1 of 27 © eFOSSILS 2012 Last revised 23 January 2012 STEP BY STEP: THE EVOLUTION OF BIPEDALISM A.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Evolution
    Introduction to Environmental Science (ENR2100) The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Professors: Brian H. Lower, Ph.D. & Steven K. Lower, Ph.D. Teaching Assistant: Tyler Lower HUMAN EVOLUTION Australopithecus afarensis "Lucy" Ardipithecus ramidus "Ardi" skele- skeleton (AL 288-1). ton (ARA-VP-6/500). Science Institute of Human Origins: October 2009, 326 (5949): 36-40. https://iho.asu.edu/about/lucy’s- http://www.sciencemag.org/con- story tent/326/5949/36 ! Intro Environmental Science • https://itunes.apple.com/us/course/intro-environmental-science/id601450178 Human Evolution Lucy is 3.2 million year old fossil that could walk on two legs and Ardi is a 4.4 million year old fos- sil that could walk on two legs and climb trees. Both were discovered in Africa and provide a great deal of insight into human evolution on Earth. Watch/read the following: 1. Watch “Finding Lucy” (scientific name is Australopithecus afarensis), Dr. Donald Johanson describes the discovery of Lucy. PBS. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPit_Mca8dM 2. Watch “Ancient Human Ancestors: Walking in the Woods” (walking on two legs makes humans unique). PBS. Two anthropologists, Dr. Tim White and Dr. Owen Lovejoy, describe “Ardi” (scientific name is Ardipithecus ramidus) a early hominid that made the transition to bipedalism. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrebQed8b2Q 3. Watch “An Interview with Tim White”, a paleoanthropologist that help discover the 4.4 million year old fossil named Ardi. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0jtu6JHwn0 4. Read the article “Ardi, Oldest Human Ancestor, Unveiled” written by Jennifer Viegas for Discovery News and published on November 27, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Portfolio 2015-2016 Copy Copy
    CONTOUR DRAWINGS: TREE DRAWINGS: STATIONARY IDENTITY: ESMERALDA ASPRILLA 3 Ballord Place #2 Cambridge, MA 02139 Cell: (617) 335-3558 [email protected] ESMERALDA ASPRILLA 3 Ballord Place #2 Cambridge, MA 02139 Cell: (617) 335-3558 [email protected] ESMERALDA ASPRILLA 3 Ballord Place #2 Cambridge, MA 02139 Cell: (617) 335-3558 [email protected] UPSIDE DOWN DRAWING: DISCRIMINATION POSTER SERIES: LOVEBODY IS LOVELOVE GENDER ROLES BODY LOVE “I had a boyfriend before I went to the Army. When I “I’m the woman that was born a man, and has to “To all the girls out there that don’t think their came home I surprised my family and was engaged prove to myself that everyday I’m woman enough beautiful because they are not a size 0, you are to a women. Now I have interest in men + women.” for the world.” beautiful. It’s society who’s ugly.” TYPE PORTRAIT: PHOTOGRAPHY: PHOTOGRAPHY: EAST CAMBRIDGE SAVINGS BANK POSTER CONTEST: START Maze Game! MAKE YOUR WAY TO EARN SOME MORE MONEY Earnings! FINISH EARN UP TO $120 AND FLIP TO THE BACK TO EARN MORE! 1st Prize: $120 2nd Prize: $60 3rd Prize: E C N A W O L L A V W $30 K Q F R S H Q E K S Q B A L A N C E O G A Y Q P I O F I R F I V T Word Bank Y E N O M G S N J I E E T M X N C S A C N F ACCOUNT INSURANCE Word Search! Y E A l C U M C G G A ALLOWANCE MATURITY EACH WORD IS WORTH $10.40.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucy’’ Redux: a Review of Research on Australopithecus Afarensis
    YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 52:2–48 (2009) ‘‘Lucy’’ Redux: A Review of Research on Australopithecus afarensis William H. Kimbel* and Lucas K. Delezene Institute of Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4101 KEY WORDS Australopithecus afarensis; Hadar; Laetoli; Pliocene hominin evolution ABSTRACT In the 1970s, mid-Pliocene hominin fossils methodology in paleoanthropology; in addition, important were found at the sites of Hadar in Ethiopia and Laetoli in fossil and genetic discoveries were changing expectations Tanzania. These samples constituted the first substantial about hominin divergence dates from extant African apes. evidence for hominins older than 3.0 Ma and were notable This coincidence of events ensured that A. afarensis figured for some remarkable discoveries, such as the ‘‘Lucy’’ partial prominently in the last 30 years of paleoanthropological skeleton and the abundant remains from the A.L. 333 local- research. Here, the 301 year history of discovery, analysis, ity at Hadar and the hominin footprint trail at Laetoli. The and interpretation of A. afarensis and its contexts are sum- Hadar and Laetoli fossils were ultimately assigned to the marized and synthesized. Research on A. afarensis contin- novel hominin species Australopithecus afarensis, which at ues and subject areas in which further investigation is the time was the most plesiomorphic and geologically an- needed to resolve ongoing debates regarding the paleobiol- cient hominin taxon. The discovery and naming of A. afar- ogy of this species are highlighted. Yrbk Phys Anthropol ensis coincided with important developments in theory and 52:2–48, 2009. VC 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
    [Show full text]