DOCSLIB.ORG

The Stoppa Combined with Iliac Fossa Approach for the Treatment of Both-Column Acetabular Fractures Yun Yang†, Chang Zou† and Yue Fang*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Yang et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2020) 15:588 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02133-3 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach for the treatment of both-column acetabular fractures Yun Yang†, Chang Zou† and Yue Fang* Abstract Background: At present, the choice of surgical approach for both-column fractures is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of the Stoppa combined with iliac fossa (S+IF) approach in the treatment of both-column fractures. Methods: In this retrospective case series, 76 patients were included in the study from 2014 to 2018. They were divided into two groups according to the surgical approaches. The differences of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, quality of reduction, clinical outcome, and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients had undergone the IL approach or the S+IF approach. The average operative time was 156.2 min (110~210 min) in group I and 126.5 min (80~180 min) in group II (P < 0.001). The average blood loss in group I was 784.1 ml, while the average blood loss in group II was 625.3 ml (P = 0.007). According to Matta’s criteria, 28 cases obtained anatomic reduction and 12 cases got imperfect reduction in group I; 21 cases obtained anatomic reduction and 7 cases got imperfect reduction in group II (P > 0.05). The clinical outcome (excellent to good) was 66% in group I versus 69% in group II (P > 0.05). The complication rates were 18.2% in group I and 12.5% in group II (P > 0.05). Conclusions: As a minimally invasive surgical approach, the S+IF approach is a valuable alternative to the IL approach for the treatment of both-column acetabular fractures if these two anterior approaches can achieve fracture exposure, reduction, and fixation. Keywords: Acetabular fracture, Both columns, Stoppa approach, Iliac fossa approach, Ilioinguinal approach, Internal fixation Background anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation are very Both-column fractures account for about 20% of the critical to obtain a good outcome [3–6]. In order to total number of acetabular fractures, which are charac- achieve accurate reduction and minimize complications, terized by no articular fragment in connection with the it is necessary to choose the appropriate surgical axial skeleton and fracture lines involving multiple approach. planes [1–3]. In the treatment of acetabular fractures, The choice of surgical approach for both-column frac- tures is still controversial. The IL approach is the stand- ard anatomic approach for most both-column fractures * Correspondence: [email protected] †Yun Yang and Chang Zou contributed equally to this work. [7] and enables direct visualization of the anterior col- Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, umn up to the symphysis pubis. The exposure of the Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Yang et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2020) 15:588 Page 2 of 7 quadrilateral plate via the IL approach can only be Surgical technique achieved by palpation of the endopelvic finger. Some IL approach scholars actively explore a single approach to treat this The incision of the IL approach began at the middle of complex injury [8–11]. Others are skeptical that neither iliac crest and was anteriorly and distally extending to the IL nor the Kocher-Langenbeck (KL) approach alone the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the pubic tu- can expose all of the fragments [12–14]. However, ex- bercle (Fig. 1). The IL approach was divided into three tensile approaches are associated with higher rates of windows by lacuna vasorum and lacuna musculorum. complications [13–15]. Therefore, limited exposure is The lateral window could be exposed by subperiosteal necessary to optimize treatment and reduce complica- dissection of the abdominal muscle and iliac muscle. tions. The Stoppa approach, as a midline approach, can The aponeurosis of the external oblique was carved to provide direct exposure of the area from the sacroiliac identify and dissociate the external ring of inguinal canal joint to the pubic symphysis (including the quadrilateral and expose the medial window. The aponeurosis of the plate) [6, 16]. However, it does not expose the iliac wing internal oblique was incised, followed by a wide drainage and is sometimes combined with the lateral window of film to free and protect the femoral vessels, femoral the IL approach to treat complex acetabular fractures nerve, lymphatic vessels, and conjunctive tendon. Finally, [17, 18]. the iliopubic fascia was separated and cut to expose the To overcome the respective limitations of the IL and middle window. After satisfactory reduction was accom- Stoppa approaches, we have treated complex acetabular plished, a prebent plate was placed for fixation. fractures through the S+IF approach in recent years. Moreover, there is little literature on the treatment of S+IF approach both-column fractures by S+IF approach. Therefore, the The patient who received the S+IF approach (Fig. 2) was aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy placed in the supine position. The incision of the Stoppa of the S+IF approach in the treatment of both-column approach was performed in the region 1~2 cm above the fractures by comparing with the IL approach. pubic symphysis. The bladder was protected, and the rectus abdominis was retracted to expose the pubic sym- Materials and methods physis and the superior ramus of the pubis. The rectus Materials abdominis and neurovascular bundle were then retracted From January 2014 to January 2018, we retrospectively laterally to protect them. If corona mortis was encoun- studied 98 patients with acetabular fractures. Inclusion tered, ligation should be performed. The iliopubic fascia criteria were (1) acute both-column fracture and (2) and obturator fascia were incisively dissected from the fractures treated with the S+IF or IL surgical approach. front to the back to expose the true pelvic rim, the quad- The exclusion criteria were (1) fractures treated via the rilateral plate, and the posterior column of the acetabu- combined anterior and posterior approaches, (2) pre- lum. The ischial support band and the back of the pelvic operative range of motion (ROM) deficiency of the hip, rim could be better exposed by stripping the psoas (3) open fractures, (4) less than 1 year of follow-up, (5) muscle. The IF approach (the lateral window of the IL conservative treatment, and patients with a history of approach) began at the middle of the iliac crest to the bladder surgery, hysterectomy, cesarean section, or pros- ASIS. The exposure of the iliac wing could be achieved tatectomy. Overall, 76 patients met the criteria for inclu- by retracting the iliac muscle and iliac vessels, and the sion. Data were collected through an anonymous way exposure could be improved by flexion, rotation, adduc- because the patients’ identifiers such as name and tion, and abduction of the affected hip. Reduction tech- unique identity were erased. This study was approved by niques included the use of a ball-spiked pusher to the Ethics Committee and Institutional Review Board of provide an outward force, the insertion of a Hohmann West China Hospital. lever at the greater sciatic notch to pry out the posterior All patients were studied with X-rays (anteroposterior column and femoral traction, or the use of traction bed and Judet oblique views) and CT scan with 3D recon- for longitudinal traction. struction for classification of acetabular fractures. Pre- operative skeletal traction was conducted on the affected Follow-up and evaluation criteria side to guard against further injury to the femoral head. The patients’ charts were surveyed for intraoperative All patients were treated by the same medical team. blood loss, operative time, quality of reduction, clinical These patients were divided into two groups according outcome, and perioperative complications. The quality to the surgical approaches. The first group included 44 of the reduction was evaluated based on the immediately patients treated by the IL approach (group I), while the postoperative radiographs. It was graded as anatomic, second group of 32 patients were treated by the S+IF imperfect, and poor according to the scoring system approach (group II). published by Matta [4]. Yang et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2020) 15:588 Page 3 of 7 Fig. 1 Surgical incision of the IL approach Follow-up was performed at 1, 2, and 3 months and 1 presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The com- year after surgery and yearly thereafter. Clinical out- plication rates of two groups were determined by chi- comes were measured using the Matta modification of square test.
Recommended publications
  • Lab #23 Anal Triangle

    Lab #23 Anal Triangle

    THE BONY PELVIS AND ANAL TRIANGLE (Grant's Dissector [16th Ed.] pp. 141-145) TODAY’S GOALS: 1. Identify relevant bony features/landmarks on skeletal materials or pelvic models. 2. Identify the sacrotuberous and sacrospinous ligaments. 3. Describe the organization and divisions of the perineum into two triangles: anal triangle and urogenital triangle 4. Dissect the ischiorectal (ischioanal) fossa and define its boundaries. 5. Identify the inferior rectal nerve and artery, the pudendal (Alcock’s) canal and the external anal sphincter. DISSECTION NOTES: The perineum is the diamond-shaped area between the upper thighs and below the inferior pelvic aperture and pelvic diaphragm. It is divided anatomically into 2 triangles: the anal triangle and the urogenital (UG) triangle (Dissector p. 142, Fig. 5.2). The anal triangle is bounded by the tip of the coccyx, sacrotuberous ligaments, and a line connecting the right and left ischial tuberosities. It contains the anal canal, which pierced the levator ani muscle portion of the pelvic diaphragm. The urogenital triangle is bounded by the ischiopubic rami to the inferior surface of the pubic symphysis and a line connecting the right and left ischial tuberosities. This triangular space contains the urogenital (UG) diaphragm that transmits the urethra (in male) and urethra and vagina (in female). A. Anal Triangle Turn the cadaver into the prone position. Make skin incisions as on page 144, Fig. 5.4 of the Dissector. Reflect skin and superficial fascia of the gluteal region in one flap to expose the large gluteus maximus muscle. This muscle has proximal attachments to the posteromedial surface of the ilium, posterior surfaces of the sacrum and coccyx, and the sacrotuberous ligament.
  • Surgical Approaches to Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis Joel M

    Surgical Approaches to Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis Joel M

    Surgical Approaches to Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis Joel M. Matta, M.D. Sponsored by Mizuho OSI APPROACHES TO THE The table will also stably position the ACETABULUM limb in a number of different positions. No one surgical approach is applicable for all acetabulum fractures. KOCHER-LANGENBECK After examination of the plain films as well as the CT scan the surgeon should APPROACH be knowledgeable of the precise anatomy of the fracture he or she is The Kocher-Langenbeck approach is dealing with. A surgical approach will primarily an approach to the posterior be selected with the expectation that column of the Acetabulum. There is the entire reduction and fixation can excellent exposure of the be performed through the surgical retroacetabular surface from the approach. A precise knowledge of the ischial tuberosity to the inferior portion capabilities of each surgical approach of the iliac wing. The quadrilateral is also necessary. In order to maximize surface is accessible by palpation the capabilities of each surgical through the greater or lesser sciatic approach it is advantageous to operate notch. A less effective though often the patient on the PROfx® Pelvic very useful approach to the anterior Reconstruction Orthopedic Fracture column is available by manipulation Table which can apply traction in a through the greater sciatic notch or by distal and/or lateral direction during intra-articular manipulation through the operation. the Acetabulum (Figure 1). Figure 2. Fractures operated through the Kocher-Langenbeck approach. Figure 3. Positioning of the patient on the PROfx® surgical table for operations through the Kocher-Lagenbeck approach.
  • The Pelvis Structure the Pelvic Region Is the Lower Part of the Trunk

    The Pelvis Structure the Pelvic Region Is the Lower Part of the Trunk

    The pelvis Structure The pelvic region is the lower part of the trunk, between the abdomen and the thighs. It includes several structures: the bony pelvis (or pelvic skeleton) is the skeleton embedded in the pelvic region of the trunk, subdivided into: the pelvic girdle (i.e., the two hip bones, which are part of the appendicular skeleton), which connects the spine to the lower limbs, and the pelvic region of the spine (i.e., sacrum, and coccyx, which are part of the axial skeleton) the pelvic cavity, is defined as the whole space enclosed by the pelvic skeleton, subdivided into: the greater (or false) pelvis, above the pelvic brim , the lesser (or true) pelvis, below the pelvic brim delimited inferiorly by the pelvic floor(or pelvic diaphragm), which is composed of muscle fibers of the levator ani, the coccygeus muscle, and associated connective tissue which span the area underneath the pelvis. Pelvic floor separate the pelvic cavity above from the perineum below. The pelvic skeleton is formed posteriorly (in the area of the back), by the sacrum and the coccyx and laterally and anteriorly (forward and to the sides), by a pair of hip bones. Each hip bone consists of 3 sections, ilium, ischium, and pubis. During childhood, these sections are separate bones, joined by the triradiate hyaline cartilage. They join each other in a Y-shaped portion of cartilage in the acetabulum. By the end of puberty the three bones will have fused together, and by the age of 25 they will have ossified. The two hip bones join each other at the pubic symphysis.
  • 7-Pelvis Nd Sacrum.Pdf

    7-Pelvis Nd Sacrum.Pdf

    Color Code Important PELVIS & SACRUM Doctors Notes Notes/Extra explanation EDITING FILE Objectives: Describe the bony structures of the pelvis. Describe in detail the hip bone, the sacrum, and the coccyx. Describe the boundaries of the pelvic inlet and outlet. Identify the articulations of the bony pelvis. List the major differences between the male and female pelvis. List the different types of female pelvis. Overview: • check this video to have a good picture about the lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJOT1cQHFqA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v5AsAESg1Q&feature=youtu.be • BONY PELVIS = 2 Hip Bones (lateral) + Sacrum (Posterior) + Coccyx (Posterior). • Hip bone is composed of 3 parts = Superior part (Ilium) + Lower anterior part (Pubis) + Lower posterior part (Ischium) only on the boys slides’ BONY PELVIS Location SHAPE Structure: Pelvis can be regarded as a basin with holes in its walls. The structure of the basin is composed of: Pelvis is the region of the Bowl shaped 4 bones 4 joints trunk that lies below the abdomen. 1-sacrum A. Two hip bones: These form the lateral and 2-ilium anterior walls of the bony pelvis. 3-ischium B. Sacrum: It forms most of the posterior wall. 4-pubic C. Coccyx: It forms most of the posterior wall. 5-pubic symphysis 6-Acetabulum Function # Primary: The skeleton of the pelvis is a basin-shaped ring of bones with holes in its wall connecting the vertebral column to both femora. Its primary functions are: bear the weight of the upper body when sitting and standing; transfer that weight from the axial skeleton to the lower appendicular skeleton when standing and walking; provide attachments for and withstand the forces of the powerful muscles of locomotion and posture.
  • Study of Significance of Total Pelvic Height and Pelvic Width in Sex Determination of Human Innominate Bone in Gujarat Region Sudarshan Gupta*, Kiran Arora **

    Study of Significance of Total Pelvic Height and Pelvic Width in Sex Determination of Human Innominate Bone in Gujarat Region Sudarshan Gupta*, Kiran Arora **

    Original Article GCSMC J Med Sci Vol (II) No (II) July-December 2013 Study of Significance of Total Pelvic Height and Pelvic Width in Sex Determination of Human Innominate Bone in Gujarat Region Sudarshan Gupta*, Kiran Arora ** Abstract : Introduction : Sex determination of the unknown hip bone either of whole skeleton or any part of it, is always a field of research not only for anatomist but also for forensic expert, anthropologist and archeologist. Hip bone was considered as ideal bone for sex determination after skull.Material and Method : This study was carried out on 100 dried human innominate bones out of them 40 were female and 60 were male bones. Gross morphometric parameters like total pelvic height, pelvic width was measured and ratio of pelvic width and total pelvic height was calculated.Results : Mean value of total pelvic height was higher in male(193.85 mm) compared to female(179.45mm), mean value of pelvic width was also higher in male (137.31 mm ) than female ( 133.24mm). It was found that mean value of ratio between pelvic width and total pelvic height was higher in female (0.74) as compared to male (0.70). The same was found statistically highly significant (P value <0.0001).Conclusion and Recommendation : The finding of this study showed that there were statistically significant gender difference were present in gross morphometric parameters, hence these measurements of the hip bone can be used for sex determination of unknown skeletons and in the forensic science for medicolegal cases. Key Words : Total pelvic height, pelvic width, innominate bone Introduction : total pelvic height, pelvic width, acetabular diameter, pubic Innominate bone is also known as hip bone.
  • Bones of the Appendicular Skeleton

    Bones of the Appendicular Skeleton

    BONES OF THE APPENDICULAR SKELETON The appendicular skeleton is composed of the 126 bones of the appendages and the pectoral and pelvic girdles, which attach the limbs to the axial skeleton. Although the bones of the upper and lower limbs differ in their functions and mobility, they have the same fundamental plan – each limb is composed of three major segments connected by movable joints. LOWER LIMB Thirty-two (32) separate bones form the bony framework of each lower limb. The lower limbs carry the entire weight of the erect body and are subjected to exceptional forces when we jump or run. Thus, it is not surprising that the bones of the lower limb are thicker and stronger than the comparable bones of the upper limb. Each of the lower limb bones may be described regionally as a bone of the pelvic girdle, thigh, leg, or foot (Figure 7). Figure 7: Bones of the lower limb Pelvic (Hip) Girdle (Marieb / Hoehn – Chapter 7; Pgs. 234 – 238) The pelvic girdle is formed by the paired os coxae (coxal bones). Together with the sacrum and coccyx of the axial skeleton, this group of bones forms the bony pelvis. The ability to bear weight is more important in the pelvic girdle than the pectoral girdle. Thus, the os coxae are heavy and massive with a firm attachment to the axial skeleton. Each os coxa is a result of the fusion of three bones: the ilium, ischium, and pubis. These three bones fuse at the deep hemispherical socket, the acetabulum, which receives the femur. Figure 8: Right os coxa, lateral and medial views A.
  • The Appendicular Skeleton

    The Appendicular Skeleton

    Unit 2 Lecture 6 Unit 2 Lecture 6 THE APPENDICULAR SKELETON The APPENDICULAR SKELETON consists of the pectoral and pelvic girdles and the upper and lower extremities. The PECTORAL (SHOULDER) GIRDLE attaches the bones of the upper extremities to the axial skeleton and supports the shoulder. The Clavicle serves as a brace to keep the arm away from the thorax. It has two curves (one convex, one concave); juncture of these curves is where most fractures to the clavicle occur. The Scapula (shoulder blade) are broad triangular bones with spines, acromium processes (articulates with the clavicle), bodies, coracoid processes, glenoid cavities (fossa) receives the head of the humerus. They provide many points for muscle attachment. The UPPER EXTREMITY consists of 60 bones (thirty per limb) that provide the framework for muscle attachment and functions in levers that move the limb and its parts. The humerus is the longest bone in the upper extremity. It has a head (proximal end), anatomical neck (former site of the epiphyseal plate), greater and lesser tubercle and intertubercular sulcus, deltoid tuberosity (point of attachment for deltoid muscle), a capitulum (articulates with the head of the radius) radial fossa (receives the head of the radius when forearm is bent), a trochlea: looks like a spool (articulates with the ulna), and a coronoid fossa (receives part of the ulna when forearm is bent), body (main shaft), olecranon fossa (receives olecranon when forearm is extended), medial (“funny bone”) and lateral epicondyles (point of muscle attachment). The surgical neck is the site of most fractures. The ulna and is longer than the radius and overlaps the humerus posteriorly.

  • Diagnosis of Inflammatory Disease in the Acute Abdomen

    University of Nebraska Medical Center DigitalCommons@UNMC MD Theses Special Collections 5-1-1939 Diagnosis of inflammatory disease in the acute abdomen Morris A. Sonderegger University of Nebraska Medical Center This manuscript is historical in nature and may not reflect current medical research and practice. Search PubMed for current research. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/mdtheses Part of the Medical Education Commons Recommended Citation Sonderegger, Morris A., "Diagnosis of inflammatory disease in the acute abdomen" (1939). MD Theses. 777. https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/mdtheses/777 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at DigitalCommons@UNMC. It has been accepted for inclusion in MD Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNMC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIAGNOSIS OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASE IN THE ACUTE ABDOMEN BY MOBRIS A. SONDEREGGER SENIOR THESIS , I PRESENTED TO i'HE COLLEGE OF MEDI CINE I ; UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OUAHA. 1939 ,-., . l fl81068 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l MECHANISM OF PAIN •••••••••••• • •• • •• • •• • •• ••.••••• .·.2 ACUTE APPENDICITIS•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••7 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF APPENDICITIS••••••••••••44 CHOLECYSTITIS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 58 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHOLEOYSTITIS ••••••••••• 73 ACUTE PERITONITIS •• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••82 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF PERITONITIS.••.•• •• •• •• 104
  • Appendicular Skeleton

    Appendicular Skeleton

    APPENDICULAR SKELETON I. Shoulder girdle A. Clavicle 1. Sternal end 2. Acromial end 3. Conoid tubercle B. Scapula 1. Spine 2. Acromion 3. Coracoid process 4. Glenoid fossa 5. Superior angle 6. Inferior angle 7. Superior border 8. Vertebral(Medial) border 9. Axillary (Lateral) border 10. Supraspinatus (Supraspinous) fossa 11. Infraspinatus (Infraspinous) fossa 12. Costal surface 13. Subscapular fossa 14. Scapular notch 15. Root (Base) Scapular Spine II. Upper Extremity A. Humerus 1. Head 2. Neck 3. Greater tubercle i. Superior facet ii. Middle facet iii. Inferior facet 4. Lesser tubercle 5. Intertubercular groove (sulcus) 6. Body 7. Deltoid tubercle 8. Coronoid fossa 9. Olecranon fossa 10. Trochlea (Medial condyle) 11. Capitulum (Lateral condyle) 12. Medial epicondyle 13. Lateral epicondyle 14. Medial Supracondylar ridge 15. Lateral Supracondylar ridge 16. Radial fossa B. Ulna 1. Head 2. Neck 3. Olecranon process 4. Semilunar (trochlear) notch 5. Coronoid process 6. Radial notch 7. Styloid process 8. Supinator crest 9. Ulnar tuberosity C. Radius 1. Head 2. Neck 3. Radial tuberosity 4. Styloid process 5. Ulnar Notch D. Carpals 1. Scaphoid 2. Lunate 3. Triquetrum (Triquetral) 4. Pisiform 5. Trapezium 6. Trapezoid 7. Capitate 8. Hamate a. Hook of Hamate E. Metacarpals 1. Head 2. Shaft 3. Base F. Phalanges 1. Base 2. Shaft 3. Head 4. Thumb (Pollex) a. Proximal b. Distal 5. Fingers (II-V) a. Proximal b. Middle c. Distal III. Pelvis A. Sacrum B. Coccyx C. Coxal (Hip) bones 1. Ilium a. Iliac crest b. Anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) c. Anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) d. Posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) e.

  • Surgical Approaches to Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis

    Surgical Approaches to Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis Joel M. Matta, M.D. Sponsored by Surgical Approaches to Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis APPROACHES TO THE The table will also stably position the limb in a number of different positions. ACETABULUM No one surgical approach is applicable KOCHER-LANGENBECK for all acetabulum fractures. After APPROACH examination of the plain films as well as the CT scan the surgeon should be knowledgeable of the precise anatomy The Kocher-Langenbeck approach is of the fracture he or she is dealing with. primarily an approach to the posterior A surgical approach will be selected column of the Acetabulum. There is with the expectation that the entire excellent exposure of the reduction and fixation can be retroacetabular surface from the ischial performed through the surgical tuberosity to the inferior portion of the approach. A precise knowledge of the iliac wing. The quadrilateral surface is capabilities of each surgical approach is accessible by palpation through the also necessary. In order to maximize greater or lesser sciatic notch. A less the capabilities of each surgical effective though often very useful approach it is advantageous to operate approach to the anterior column is the patient on the PROfx® Pelvic available by manipulation through the Reconstruction Orthopedic Fracture greater sciatic notch or by intra- Table which can apply traction in a articular manipulation through the distal and/or lateral direction during Acetabulum (Figure 1). the operation. Mizuho OSI 2018 1 NW0709 Rev C Surgical Approaches to Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis Figure 2. Fractures operated through the Kocher-Langenbeck approach.

  • Space Available for Trans-Sacral Implants to Treat Fractures of The

    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (2019) 139:1385–1391 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03204-9 TRAUMA SURGERY Space available for trans‑sacral implants to treat fractures of the pelvis assessed by virtual implant positioning Daniel Wagner1 · Lukas Kamer2 · Takeshi Sawaguchi3 · Hansrudi Noser2 · Masafumi Uesugi4 · Andreas Baranowski1 · Dominik Gruszka1 · Pol M. Rommens1 Received: 4 September 2018 / Published online: 21 May 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Introduction The use of trans-sacral implants to treat fractures of the sacrum is limited by the variable pelvic anatomy. We were interested in how many trans-sacral implants can be placed per pelvis? If a trans-sacral implant cannot be placed in S1, where is the cortex perforated, and is the use of sacroiliac screws safe in these pelves? Materials and methods 3D pelvic models were created from CT scans of 156 individuals without fractures (92 European and 64 Japanese, 79 male and 77 female, mean age 66.7 ± 13.7 years). Trans-sacral implants with a diameter of 7.3 mm were positioned virtually with and without a surrounding safe zone of 12 mm diameter. Results Fifty-one percent of pelves accommodated trans-sacral implants in S1 with a safe zone. Twenty-two percent did not ofer enough space in S1 for an implant even when ignoring the safe zone. Every pelvis had sufcient space for a trans-sacral implant in S2, in 78% including a safe zone as well. In S1, implant perforation was observed in the sacral ala and iliac fossa in 69%, isolated iliac fossa perforation in 23% and perforation of the sacral ala in 8%.
  • Of the Ilium Iliac Fossa Took Bone in the Application of Autologous Bone Graft

    Of the Ilium Iliac Fossa Took Bone in the Application of Autologous Bone Graft

    International Surgery Journal Gao QK et al. Int Surg J. 2015 May;2(2):218-220 http://www.ijsurgery.com pISSN 2349-3305 | eISSN 2349-2902 DOI: 10.5455/2349-2902.isj20150518 Research Article “Open window” of the ilium iliac fossa took bone in the application of autologous bone graft Qian Kun Gao, Wei Li, Min Dai* The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China Received: 05 February 2015 Revised: 17 February 2015 Accepted: 22 March 2015 *Correspondence: Dr. Min Dai, E-mail: [email protected] Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT Background: Objective: To explore practical, simple, and less complications method of iliac cut. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 23 patients with iliac bone taken between the June 2011 - June 2013. Using “windowed iliac fossa” to cut single or double cortex ilium, then count donor site complications and related factors. Results: There is no abnormal appearance at the taken sit of the iliac, also there is no local pain or tenderness touch. The skin feeling of hip and thigh are normal, the VAS is 7-9, the department of belt are also unaffected. Conclusions: As an improved method of bone taken in the autogenous bone graft, the complications of “windowed iliac fossa” decreased significantly than the traditional method, as a new methods of iliac cut, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice.