Download Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Thesis This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Telltale women the dramaturgy of female characters in Shakespeare's history plays Bachrach, Hailey Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Bachrach 1 TELLTALE WOMEN The Dramaturgy of Female Characters in Shakespeare’s History Plays By Hailey Bachrach Submitted to King’s College London English Department in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 30 September 2020 Bachrach 2 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 4 Notes .......................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER ONE | Facts Disfigured: Reading History Through Female Characters ......... 22 History and Accuracy: Edward III ................................................................................................ 27 History and Englishness: Henry VI ............................................................................................... 42 History and the Stage: Margaret of Anjou ................................................................................... 53 History and Tragedy: King John, Henry VIII, and Richard III ................................................. 62 CHAPTER TWO | From the Margins: Reading Female Characters Into History .............. 73 Unheeded warnings ........................................................................................................................ 77 Political marriages .......................................................................................................................... 85 The domestic realm ....................................................................................................................... 101 Historical fictions .......................................................................................................................... 114 CHAPTER THREE | History as Exclusion: Shakespeare’s Feminine Historiography .... 121 Prophesying the past .................................................................................................................... 122 Marginalised historians ................................................................................................................ 141 The genre of history ...................................................................................................................... 158 CHAPTER FOUR | Blurring the Boundaries: Effeminacy and Feminine History .......... 168 Effeminate men and women’s history ........................................................................................ 177 Feminine historians and returning to history ............................................................................ 191 Historicising boys .......................................................................................................................... 199 CHAPTER FIVE | Modern History: The Past in the Present ............................................ 207 Accuracy and Emilia .................................................................................................................... 210 Emotion and It’s True, It’s True, It’s True ................................................................................. 225 Nation and The James Plays ........................................................................................................ 233 CONCLUSION | ‘This is what you came to see’ ................................................................. 248 WORKS CITED .................................................................................................................... 254 Bachrach 3 Abstract This thesis undertakes a feminist re-reading of the female characters in Shakespeare’s history plays. Drawing upon both historical and contemporary performance and the broader theatrical context of the early modern period, I use the multidisciplinary lens of dramaturgy to investigate how these characters function as specifically theatrical figures, realigning traditional understandings of the shape and purpose of the history play. The first chapter explores some of the most common assumptions about the nature of a history play—that it is tragic, that it is historically accurate, that it relates to a broader nationalistic agenda, and that exclusion of the female is fundamental to the genre—and looks at how reading plays by Shakespeare and his contemporaries through the lens of their most prominent female characters troubles these assumptions. The second chapter turns to female characters whose roles in the plays are smaller and more marginal, a position that has led to critics consistently underrating their contributions to the plot. The chapter uncovers a pattern of interactions that recur in minor female roles across almost all of Shakespeare’s history plays, instances of attempted disruption of the plot that are unsuccessful. The third chapter explores how characters narrate history within the plays themselves, particularly when they appear to transgress the boundaries of historical possibility through curses, prophecy, or narrating events they have not seen—extra-historical powers enabled by their marginalisation from political power. The fourth chapter argues that these processes of marginalisation represent a feminine, not explicitly female, mode of storytelling by suggesting that male characters who undergo processes of disempowerment explicitly associated with femininity are endowed with the same historicising powers as female characters. Bachrach 4 The fifth chapter examines contemporary history plays written by and about women that explicitly or implicitly challenge Shakespeare’s still-influential historical dramaturgy. These new works reveal not only the negotiations that self-identified feminist writers undertake to find a space for women within Shakespearean dramaturgy, but the assumptions about Shakespeare, history, and the role of women within both that inform such artistic responses. Acknowledgements This project of course would not exist without the tireless generosity and support of my supervisors, Sonia Massai and Will Tosh. Thank you for encouraging me from the earliest stages, and always going above and beyond. I would also like to thank my parents, who did their best to actually read this draft, and my sister Hannah for keeping me in supply of pictures of our dogs (Bucky and Louise, thank you to you as well, though you are dogs and cannot read). You all feel very far away right now, but I’ve never doubted that you’re all there for me. Thank you to my PhD supervisory siblings, Robin Craig and Julian Neuhauser, and to Emily MacLeod. You were all with me every step of the way, and I hope you all know how much it means to have someone who knows exactly what you’re going through. And thank you to the entire 2019 Globe Ensemble, including (because I promised I’d put their names in this) Philip Arditti and Helen Schlesinger. Bachrach 5 Notes Spelling has been modernised except when unavoidable, as in a quotation from a scholar who has not modernised spelling. Unless otherwise noted, quotations from the plays under discussion are taken from the following editions, with further citations included in-text. Titles of Shakespeare’s plays are occasionally abbreviated (R2 for Richard II, etc). In some cases, as with the use of the 2008 reprints of the Oxford Shakespeare, texts were selected over more recent editions simply because they were the version accessible to me for final edits and consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic. In some instances, page ranges in citations for journals and collections were not available for the same reason. King Edward III, ed. by Richard Proudfoot and Nicola Bennett, The Arden Shakespeare (London: Bloomsbury, 2017) Henry IV Part One, ed. by David Bevington, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) Henry IV Part Two,
Recommended publications
  • War of Roses: a House Divided
    Stanford Model United Nations Conference 2014 War of Roses: A House Divided Chairs: Teo Lamiot, Gabrielle Rhoades Assistant Chair: Alyssa Liew Crisis Director: Sofia Filippa Table of Contents Letters from the Chairs………………………………………………………………… 2 Letter from the Crisis Director………………………………………………………… 4 Introduction to the Committee…………………………………………………………. 5 History and Context……………………………………………………………………. 5 Characters……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Topics on General Conference Agenda…………………………………..……………. 9 Family Tree ………………………………………………………………..……………. 12 Special Committee Rules……………………………………………………………….. 13 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. 14 Letters from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Gabrielle Rhoades, and it is my distinct pleasure to welcome you to the Stanford Model United Nations Conference (SMUNC) 2014 as members of the The Wars of the Roses: A House Divided Joint Crisis Committee! As your Wars of the Roses chairs, Teo Lamiot and I have been working hard with our crisis director, Sofia Filippa, and SMUNC Secretariat members to make this conference the best yet. If you have attended SMUNC before, I promise that this year will be even more full of surprise and intrigue than your last conference; if you are a newcomer, let me warn you of how intensely fun and challenging this conference will assuredly be. Regardless of how you arrive, you will all leave better delegates and hopefully with a reinvigorated love for Model UN. My own love for Model United Nations began when I co-chaired a committee for SMUNC (The Arab Spring), which was one of my very first experiences as a member of the Society for International Affairs at Stanford (the umbrella organization for the MUN team), and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Later that year, I joined the intercollegiate Model United Nations team.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestors of Elizabeth Garrard
    Ancestors of Elizabeth Garrard Generation No. 1 1. Elizabeth Garrard, born October 24, 1808 in East Indies1; died Aft. April 1881. She was the daughter of 2. William Garrard and 3. Martha Francis. She married (1) Henry Garnet Man October 27, 1840 in St. Mark's Church, Kennington, London. He was born Abt. 1804, and died November 4, 1873 in 19 Derby Terrace, Derby Rd, Croydon, Surrey. Aged 69. He was the son of Peter Brules Man. More About Elizabeth Garrard: Residence: 1881, 15 Aldebert Terrace, Lambeth, Surrey Notes for Henry Garnet Man: Informant on death certificate was Priscilla Creak. She appears on the 1881 census, aged 64, an annuitant, living with her widowed daughter Margaret Baker at 17 Derby Terrace, Croydon. She was born in Adderton, Suffolk. More About Henry Garnet Man: Burial: Queens Road Cemetery, Croydon, Surrey2 Cause of Death: Bright's Disease Occupation 1: Captain, 54th Foot, later Honorary Lt. Col. Occupation 2: Professor of Fortification at Sandhurst Marriage Notes for Elizabeth Garrard and Henry Man: Witnesses: Jno. Man, Edward D. Man. Generation No. 2 2. William Garrard3, born December 3, 1779 in Reading, Berks4; died September 2, 1836 in Madras, India. Aged 56.4. He was the son of 4. William Houghton Garrard and 5. Anne _____. He married 3. Martha Francis July 8, 1806 in Lambourn, Berks4. 3. Martha Francis, born March 1786 in Lambourn, Berks.4; died December 20, 1853 in 2 Lansdowne Cottages, South Lambeth. Aged 69.5. She was the daughter of 6. Edward Francis and 7. Mary Spicer. Notes for William Garrard: According to the memoirs of F C Garrard, William 'lost money in Peruvian bonds, returned to India again and died there'.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael West
    Theater of Enigma in Shakespeare’s England Michael West Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2017 Michael West All rights reserved ABSTRACT Theater of Enigma in Shakespeare’s England Michael West Theater of Enigma in Shakespeare’s England demonstrates the cognitive, affective, and social import of enigmatic theatrical moments. While the presence of other playgoers obviously shapes the experience of attending a play, I argue that deliberately induced moments of audience ignorance are occasions for audience members to be especially aware of their relations to others who may or may not share their bafflement. I explore the character of states of knowing and not-knowing among audience members and the relations that obtain among playgoers who inhabit these states. Further, I trace the range of performance techniques whereby playgoers are positioned in a cognitive no-man's land, lying somewhere between full understanding and utter ignorance—techniques that I collectively term “enigmatic theater.” I argue that moments of enigmatic theater were a dynamic agent in the formation of collectives in early modern playhouses. I use here the term “collective” to denote the temporary, occasional, and fleeting quality of these groupings, which occur during performance but are dissipated afterwards. Sometimes, this collective resembles what Victor Turner terms communitas, in which the normal societal divisions are suspended and the playgoers become a unified collectivity. At other times, however, plays solicit the formation of multiple collectives defined by their differing degrees of knowledge about a seeming enigma.
    [Show full text]
  • Purgatoire Saint Patrice, Short Metrical Chronicle, Fouke Le Fitz Waryn, and King Horn
    ROMANCES COPIED BY THE LUDLOW SCRIBE: PURGATOIRE SAINT PATRICE, SHORT METRICAL CHRONICLE, FOUKE LE FITZ WARYN, AND KING HORN A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Catherine A. Rock May 2008 Dissertation written by Catherine A. Rock B. A., University of Akron, 1981 B. A., University of Akron, 1982 B. M., University of Akron, 1982 M. I. B. S., University of South Carolina, 1988 M. A. Kent State University, 1991 M. A. Kent State University, 1998 Ph. D., Kent State University, 2008 Approved by ___________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Susanna Fein ___________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Don-John Dugas ___________________________________ Kristen Figg ___________________________________ David Raybin ___________________________________ Isolde Thyret Accepted by ___________________________________, Chair, Department of English Ronald J. Corthell ___________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Jerry Feezel ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………viii Chapter I. Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Significance of the Topic…………………………………………………..2 Survey of the State of the Field……………………………………………5 Manuscript Studies: 13th-14th C. England………………………...5 Scribal Studies: 13th-14th C. England……………………………13 The Ludlow Scribe of Harley 2253……………………………...19 British Library
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • Kyd and Shakespeare: Authorship, Influence, and Collaboration
    Kyd and Shakespeare: Authorship, Influence, and Collaboration Darren Anthony Freebury-Jones A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Cardiff University 2016 Abstract The aim of this thesis is to establish the canon of Thomas Kyd’s plays and to explore Shakespeare’s relationship with that oeuvre. Chapter One begins by examining Shakespeare’s verbal indebtedness to plays that have been attributed to Kyd for over two centuries, including The Spanish Tragedy (1587), Soliman and Perseda (1588), and The True Chronicle History of King Leir (1589). The first chapter argues that Shakespeare’s extensive knowledge of Kyd’s plays contributed towards the development of his dramatic language. The second chapter provides an overview of some of the complex methods for identifying authors utilized throughout the thesis. Chapter Three then seeks to establish a fuller account of Kyd’s dramatic canon through a variety of authorship tests, arguing that in addition to the three plays above Arden of Faversham (1590), Fair Em (1590), and Cornelia (1594) should be attributed to Kyd as sole authored texts. The fourth chapter examines the internal evidence for Kyd’s hand in Shakespeare’s Henry VI Part One (1592). The chapter contends that Shakespeare’s chronicle history play was originally written by Kyd and Thomas Nashe for the Lord Strange’s Men, and that Shakespeare subsequently added three scenes for the Lord Chamberlain’s Men. The fifth chapter argues that Shakespeare and Kyd collaborated on The Reign of King Edward III (1593) and that Kyd should thus be recognized as one of Shakespeare’s earliest co-authors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tragédia De Macbeth (The Tragedy of Macbeth)
    W E I L R L WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE I A A M E S P H S A E K K E S A A vida é apenas uma sombra errante, um mau ator P E H A S A se pavonear e afligir no seu momento sobre o palco R E do qual nada mais se ouve. É uma história E M Contada por um idiota, cheia de som e fúria, A tragédia de A I Significando nada. L A tragédia de MACBETH A tragédia de Macbeth L I W MACBETH Tradução Rafael Raffaelli William Shakespeare provavelmente finalizou A tragédia de Tradução Edição bilíngue Inglês e Português Macbeth em 1606. Densa, enigmática, estranha, sinistra, Rafael Raffaelli não são poucos os adjetivos para qualificar essa notável tragédia em cinco atos, que é considerada pela crítica uma de suas mais importantes obras. Embora possa ser interpretada como uma tragédia da ambição, Shakespeare vai além da análise da personalidade dos personagens e suas motivações, versando com maestria única sobre a sempiterna questão da editora ufsc www.editora.ufsc.br 9 788532 807847 origem do Mal. A tragédia de Macbeth The tragedy of Macbeth UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA Reitor Luiz Carlos Cancellier de Olivo Vice-Reitora Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann EDITORA DA UFSC Diretora Executiva Gleisy R. B. Fachin Conselho Editorial Gleisy R. B. Fachin (Presidente) Ana Lice Brancher Andreia Guerini Clélia Maria Lima de Mello e Campigotto João Luiz Dornelles Bastos Kátia Maheirie Luis Alberto Gómez Marilda Aparecida de Oliveira Effting Editora da UFSC Campus Universitário – Trindade Caixa Postal 476 88010-970 – Florianópolis-SC Fone: (48) 3721-9408 [email protected] www.editora.ufsc.br
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare Apocrypha” Peter Kirwan
    The First Collected “Shakespeare Apocrypha” Peter Kirwan he disparate group of early modern plays still referred to by many Tcritics as the “Shakespeare Apocrypha” take their dubious attributions to Shakespeare from a variety of sources. Many of these attributions are external, such as the explicit references on the title pages of The London Prodigal (1605), A Yorkshire Tragedy (1608), 1 Sir John Oldcastle (1619), The Troublesome Raigne of King John (1622), The Birth of Merlin (1662), and (more ambiguously) the initials on the title pages of Locrine (1595), Thomas Lord Cromwell (1602), and The Puritan (1607). Others, including Edward III, Arden of Faversham, Sir Thomas More, and many more, have been attributed much later on the basis of internal evidence. The first collection of disputed plays under Shakespeare’s name is usually understood to be the second impression of the Third Folio in 1664, which “added seven Playes, never before Printed in Folio.”1 Yet there is some evidence of an interest in dubitanda before the Restoration. The case of the Pavier quar- tos, which included Oldcastle and Yorkshire Tragedy among authentic plays and variant quartos in 1619, has been amply discussed elsewhere as an early attempt to create a canon of texts that readers would have understood as “Shakespeare’s,” despite later critical division of these plays into categories of “authentic” and “spu- rious,” which was then supplanted by the canon presented in the 1623 Folio.2 I would like to attend, however, to a much more rarely examined early collection of plays—Mucedorus, Fair Em, and The Merry Devil of Edmonton, all included in C.
    [Show full text]
  • “Early Modern Aesthetics” Saa 2015, Vancouver, Bc Abstracts & Bios
    “EARLY MODERN AESTHETICS” SAA 2015, VANCOUVER, BC ABSTRACTS & BIOS “Macbeth’s Raptness, or The Aesthetics of Fascination” Sibylle Baumbach University of Mainz “[T]he longer we gaze, the more we crave, yea so forcible they are, that afterwards being but thought upon, they make us seeke for the like an other time.”1 As suggested by Stephen Gosson, Early Modern theatre worked as an ocular drug. It fascinated spectators not only by its immediacy and inclusiveness, but especially by its ability to stimulate seemingly contradictory aesthetic responses, as suggested, for instance, by the aesthetic credo (‘foul is fair and fair is foul’) of the three weird sisters, whose appearance leaves Macbeth rapt. The discourse of ocular contagion is closely linked to Early Modern notions of fascination, i.e. the notion of bewitchment through corrupted ‘spirits’ that infected spectators’ eyes and minds, which culminated in the belief in the evil eye. As I will argue in my paper, Early Modern drama responded to and countered antitheatrical attacks by employing what I refer to as an aesthetics of fascination, which arises from the simultaneous stimulation of attraction and repulsion. This aesthetic tension can be traced in several plays: the seductive hunchback Richard Gloucester in Richard III, the sweet verse of brutish Caliban in The Tempest, the playful combination (and inversion) of demonic black and angelic white in Othello, or the exotic otherness and infinite variety of the Egyptian queen in Antony and Cleopatra, who as epitome of seductiveness and femme fatale, inhabits an imagined, deferred presence. As I will strive to show, part of the attraction of Early Modern drama is based on a newly established aesthetics of fascination, which challenged aesthetic standards of the time to promote a new kind of theatre – a theatre of fascination, which did not only aim to attract, but also disclosed to the audience the aesthetics of fascination it employed to counter antitheatrical sentiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Henry IV, Part 1
    Synopsis of Henry IV, Part 1 ing Henry IV tenuously rules England as a man who Prince Hal takes control of the royal army, appointing uKsurped the throne and is not ordained by God. He is a Falstaff as the leader of a company of foot soldiers. Under ruler beset with troubles: rebellion in England and attacks this new leadership, the King’s army meets the rebels at the by Scottish forces moving across the northern border. Battle of Shrewsbury. Glendower and Northumberland have Henry postpones his crusade to the Holy Land when he deserted the cause, leaving Hotspur to face Prince Hal’s learns of the defeat and capture of his loyal Mortimer by the forces alone. King Henry offers to pardon the rebels if they Scottish warrior, Glendower. On another battlefront Henry will disband but Worcester, the messenger, refrains from Percy, nicknamed Hotspur, has quashed a Scottish informing the others. uprising. Though King Henry is annoyed when Hotspur refuses to hand over his captives to the crown, he admires On the battlefield, the rebel Earl of Douglas engages King Hotspur’s bravery and wishes his own son, Hal, displayed Henry in combat, getting the better of the King until Prince the same noble qualities. Hal comes to the rescue, causing Douglas to flee. Hotspur enters the scene and clashes swords with Hal in one-on-one Prince Hal prefers to spend his time frequenting the combat that will determine the winner of the battle. During taverns of Eastcheap with the errant knight, Falstaff. their fight, Douglas re-enters and wounds Falstaff, who Though Prince Hal has been leading a life of drinking and plays dead in an effort to avoid being killed.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Henry 4 Closes in July 1403
    Reigned 1399–1413. The play opens in June 1402; 1 henry 4 closes in July 1403. Written about 1597. Dramatis Personae: King Henry the Fourth Henry, Prince of Wales, called Prince Hal Prince John of Lancaster Earl of Westmoreland Sir Walter Blunt Thomas Percy, Earl of Worcester Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland Henry Percy, called Hotspur Edmund Mortimer Richard Scroop Archibald, Earl of Douglas Owen Glendower Sir Richard Vernon Sir John Falstaff Sir Michael Poins Gadshill Peto Bardolph Lady Percy, wife of Hotspur Lady Mortimer Mistress Quickly Lords, Officers, Sheriff, Vintner Chamberlain, Drawers, Carriers, Travelers and Attendants Robin Williams • www.iReadShakespeare.org • www.InternationalShakespeare.center Reigned 1399-1413. The play opens in June 1402; 1 henry 4 closes in July 1403. Written about 1597. Name and title Birth date Death date Age in play Age at death King Henry IV 1367 1413 36/37 46 Son of John of Gaunt; cousin to Richard II. Usurped Richard II and became Henry IV. Henry, Prince of Wales, called Prince Hal sep 1387 1442 of 16/17 35 Also called Henry of Monmouth. Oldest son to King Henry dystentery in IV. Mother is Mary de Bohun. France Prince John of Lancaster, Duke of Bedford 1389 Sep 1435 13/14 46 3rd son of Henry IV; brother to Henry V and Gloucester; uncle to Henry VI. Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmoreland 1364 1425 38/39 61 This is Ralph, 6th Baron Neville of Raby, son of John 5th Baron and Maud Percy. Married second Joan Beaufort, daughter of Gaunt and Swynford. Sir Walter Blunt 1350 1403 52/53 53 Famous soldier and supporter of John of Gaunt.
    [Show full text]
  • Dramatic Form in the Early Modern English History Play
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Dramatic Form in the Early Modern English History Play A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of English School of Arts and Sciences Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Shaun Stiemsma Washington, DC 2017 Dramatic Form in the Early Modern English History Play Shaun Stiemsma, Ph.D. Director: Michael Mack, Ph.D. The early modern history play has been assumed to exist as an independent genre at least since Shakespeare’s first folio divided his plays into comedies, tragedies, and histories. However, history has never—neither during the period nor in literary criticism since—been satisfactorily defined as a distinct dramatic genre. I argue that this lack of definition obtains because early modern playwrights did not deliberately create a new genre. Instead, playwrights using history as a basis for drama recognized aspects of established genres in historical source material and incorporated them into plays about history. Thus, this study considers the ways in which playwrights dramatizing history use, manipulate, and invert the structures and conventions of the more clearly defined genres of morality, comedy, and tragedy. Each chapter examines examples to discover generic patterns present in historical plays and to assess the ways historical materials resist the conceptions of time suggested by established dramatic genres. John Bale’s King Johan and the anonymous Woodstock both use a morality structure on a loosely contrived history but cannot force history to conform to the apocalyptic resolution the genre demands.
    [Show full text]