Dramatic Form in the Early Modern English History Play

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dramatic Form in the Early Modern English History Play THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Dramatic Form in the Early Modern English History Play A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of English School of Arts and Sciences Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Shaun Stiemsma Washington, DC 2017 Dramatic Form in the Early Modern English History Play Shaun Stiemsma, Ph.D. Director: Michael Mack, Ph.D. The early modern history play has been assumed to exist as an independent genre at least since Shakespeare’s first folio divided his plays into comedies, tragedies, and histories. However, history has never—neither during the period nor in literary criticism since—been satisfactorily defined as a distinct dramatic genre. I argue that this lack of definition obtains because early modern playwrights did not deliberately create a new genre. Instead, playwrights using history as a basis for drama recognized aspects of established genres in historical source material and incorporated them into plays about history. Thus, this study considers the ways in which playwrights dramatizing history use, manipulate, and invert the structures and conventions of the more clearly defined genres of morality, comedy, and tragedy. Each chapter examines examples to discover generic patterns present in historical plays and to assess the ways historical materials resist the conceptions of time suggested by established dramatic genres. John Bale’s King Johan and the anonymous Woodstock both use a morality structure on a loosely contrived history but cannot force history to conform to the apocalyptic resolution the genre demands. Marlowe’s Edward II takes many aspects of the same genre but inverts them to show a bitter and tragic historical perspective. Conversely, Shakespeare’s Henry IV plays engage in competing modes of comic time, as Falstaff’s saturnalian comedy succumbs to Prince Hal’s long-planned comic resolution to his own morality play. Another conventional comic resolution—marriage—is explored using the close of both Richard III and Henry V, and in both cases Shakespeare affirms and limits the unified resolution that marriage offers to historical events. As one of the last “histories,” John Ford’s Perkin Warbeck presents what its author calls “Chronicle History” as a tragedy that denies its audience the certainty that chronicles offer. Finally, Robert Greene’s ahistorical James IV is used to reconsider the parameters of the history play, finding that even a highly fictionalized account can create distinct effects between known history and generic conventions. Through the exploration of these plays, this study intends to suggest the simultaneous interdependence and incompatibility of history and dramatic form. This dissertation by Shaun Stiemsma fulfills the dissertation requirement for the doctoral degree in English approved by Michael Mack, Ph.D., as Director, and by Tobias Gregory, Ph.D. and Jennifer Paxton, Ph.D., as Readers. ______________________________________ Michael Mack, Ph.D., Director ______________________________________ Tobias Gregory, Ph.D., Reader ______________________________________ Jennifer Paxton, Ph.D., Reader ii Table of Contents Introduction: History as a Dramatic Genre 1 Chapter 1: History as Allegory: Morality Form in Bale’s King Johan 56 Chapter 2: History as Moral Test: Woodstock and the Everyman King 89 Chapter 3: History as Amoral: Edward II and the Tragedy of a Moral Universe 125 Chapter 4: History as “Redeeming Time:” Saturnalia and Morality as Comic Modes in 1 and 2 Henry IV 166 Chapter 5: History as Unity: Marriage and Comic Closure in History 232 Chapter 6: History vs. Tragedy: Perkin Warbeck as Tragic Hero 265 Conclusion: Greene’s Accidental History and the Nature of Early Modern Historical Drama 314 iii Acknowledgements Thanks to God, who directs history toward comedy but permits tragedy if we want it badly enough. With grateful thanks to my wife, Sarah, without whom I would never have been able to start, and to my whole family, who have put up with this project for far too long. Thanks also to Dr. Michael Mack, whose advice and guidance both allowed me to follow my own path through this project and pushed me not only to make this a better dissertation but also to become a better scholar and thinker. Finally, thanks to Dr. Paxton, Dr. Gregory, Dr. Gibbons, and Dr. Ward, all of whom have provided invaluable advice and assistance through this project. iv Introduction: History as a Dramatic Genre “a rude Notion of it; indeed rather a Description then a Definition” –Lisidius, John Dryden’s “An Essay of Dramatick Poesy”1 Although its existence has been assumed since at least the division of Shakespeare’s first folio into three distinct genres, the problem genre of the early modern history play is more surely a problem than it is a genre. Early modern literary critics have discussed and debated the definition of what was an apparently recognizable form in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, but, despite many conceptualizations over the past four centuries, there is still no scholarly consensus on exactly what is meant by the genre “history play.” In the introduction to a 2008 collection of critical essays about history plays, Theresa Grant and Barbara Ravelhofer acknowledge not only the lack of certainty about what they propose to discuss but also that the ongoing critical discussion of such plays “will probably never result in a satisfactory agreed answer to the question ‘What is a history play?’”2 Approaches to the definition have varied from considering the source, the form, the purpose, the subject, the characters involved, or even the location of the action as the key to identifying and understanding the form, but no approach has come close to the kind of clarity of definition typical of the classical genres of tragedy and comedy. Nonetheless, in Shakespeare’s first folio, the familiar genres of comedy and tragedy are joined by history as if all three were equally certain and accepted as distinct and recognizable forms. Thus, a typical way of making sense of the genre of the early modern history play has 1 Dryden: Poetry, Prose, & Plays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP), 384. 2 “Introduction,” in English Historical Drama, 1500-1660: Forms Outside the Canon, ed. by Teresa Grant and Barbara Ravelhofer (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 1. 1 2 been to accept those included in Shakespeare’s folio as central examples, add other plays from the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries that seem most similar to Shakespeare’s, and then describe the set of plays included. Such attempts at definition also must be careful to exclude Shakespeare’s plays that the folio did not classify as tragedies, such as the Roman plays, as well as King Lear and Macbeth, all of which might seem, according to at least some of their attributes, to be history plays. With this basis for the genre of the history play, a clear definition of history as a distinct genre, particularly a definition using similar principles to those used to define the classical genres, has proved elusive to literary and dramatic critics for hundreds of years. Rather than starting with the group included in the folio, a better way to understand the genre as it must have been understood in its own time is to explore the references to history plays in early modern publications. The genre has some apparent existence predating the folio’s classification system, as printed plays include the word “history” in titles as early as the middle of the sixteenth century,3 but these are hardly a dependable source of generic identity. Indeed, no part of Shakespeare’s first tetralogy of “history” plays included the word “history” or any form of it in any publication prior to the folio, and only Henry IV, Part 1 and Henry V, of all those plays of Shakespeare commonly considered “histories,” actually included “history” in any part of the title of an edition printed prior to the folio. Further, editions of the “histories” of Richard II, Richard III, and Henry VI all include the word “tragedy” as a part of their titles. Not only are 3 The two earliest dramas including the word history in the title are John Pikering’s A newe enterlude of vice conteyninge, the historye of Horestes with the cruell reuengment of his fathers death, vpon his one naturill mother, published in 1567, and the anonymous play A nevve mery and vvittie comedie or enterlude, newely imprinted, treating vpon the historie of Iacob and Esau taken out of the xxvij. chap. of the first booke of Moses entituled Genesis, published in 1568. The length and descriptive nature of these titles, both also called enterludes, and one also referred to as a comedy, provide nearly sufficient argument against making too much of the published titles of plays as a dependable guide to genre. 3 “history” plays rarely called such in quartos, but many plays not based on history are called “histories:” just from Shakespeare, Hamlet, Troilus and Cressida and more had some form of the word in their printed titles.4 Beyond the scope of Shakespeare’s plays, even the more precise term “Chronicle History” is not particularly helpful—the anonymous King Leir, based on Britain’s mythic past, is called such, but so is No-Body and Some-Body, an absurd play which features the entirely fictional “Elydure” as a thrice-crowned king of England.5 The use of “history” for plays about mythic events or even entirely fictional narratives suggests not only that the term “history play” was not clearly defined and consistently used but also that the very term “history” was ambiguous. Thus, these titles indicate a further problem with using the term “history” as applicable to specific plays and representing a distinct genre: in early modern England, the word was often used as synonymous with “story,” without any special reference to the truth of the events involved.
Recommended publications
  • Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
    Saturday, September 8 1979 Arts Guild Fair, Central Park, Northfield Overture to the Magic Flute (Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart) Finlandia (Jean Sibelius) London Suite (Eric Coates) Country Gardens (Percy Grainger) Berceuse and FInale- Firebird (Igor Stravinsky) Dance Rhythms (Wallingford Riegger) Simple Gifts (Aaron Copland) Hoedown (Aaron Copland) August 23, 1986 Carleton College Concert Hall Carneval Overture (Antonin Dvorak) Valse Triste (Jan Sibelius) Konzertstuck for Four Horns and Orchestra Wedding Day at Troldhaugen (Edvard Grieg) Highlights from Showboat (Jerome Kern/Oscar Hammerstein) Why Do I Love You? Can’t Help Lovin Dat Man You Are Love - soloist- Myrna Johnson The Moldau from Ma Vlast (Bedrich Smetana) American Salute (Morton Gould) August 28, 1986 Fairbault Junior High Auditorium- 7:30 pm Carneval Overture (Antonin Dvorak) Valse Triste (jan Sibelius) Konzertstuck for Four Horns and Orchestra Prelude to Act III of Lohengrin First Movement from Violin Concerto no. 3 in G, K216 (W.A. mozart) The Moldau from Ma Vlast (Bedrich Smetana) American Salute (Morton Gould) Saturday, May 14, 1994 United Methodist Church, Northfield- 2:30pm Northfield Cello Choir (Directed by Stephen Peckley): Pilgrim’s Chorus (Richard Wagner) Sarabande and Two Gavottes (J.S. Bach) Red Rose Rag (Traditional) Suite for Strings in Olden Style from Holberg’s Time, Op.40 (Edvard Grieg) Prelude: Allegro Vivace Sarabande: Andante Rigaudon: Allegro Con Brio Geraldine Casper- violin solo Paul Tarabek- viola solo Concerto in D Major for Cello and Orchestra (Josef Haydn)
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Telltale women the dramaturgy of female characters in Shakespeare's history plays Bachrach, Hailey Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Bachrach 1 TELLTALE WOMEN The Dramaturgy of Female Characters in Shakespeare’s History Plays By Hailey Bachrach Submitted to King’s College London English Department in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 30 September 2020 Bachrach 2 Abstract .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • John Bale's <I>Kynge Johan</I> As English Nationalist Propaganda
    Quidditas Volume 35 Article 10 2014 John Bale’s Kynge Johan as English Nationalist Propaganda G. D. George Prince George's County Public Schools, Prince George's Community College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation George, G. D. (2014) "John Bale’s Kynge Johan as English Nationalist Propaganda," Quidditas: Vol. 35 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol35/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Quidditas 35 (2014) 177 John Bale’s Kynge Johan as English Nationalist Propaganda G. D. George Prince George’s County Public Schools Prince George’s Community College John Bale is generally associated with the English Reformation rather than the Tudor government. It may be that Bale’s well-know protestant polemics tend to overshadow his place in Thomas Cromwell’s propaganda machine, and that Bale’s Kynge Johan is more a propaganda piece for the Tudor monarchy than it is just another of his Protestant dramas.. Introduction On 2 January, 1539, a “petie and nawghtely don enterlude,” that “put down the Pope and Saincte Thomas” was presented at Canterbury.1 Beyond the fact that a four hundred sixty-one year old play from Tudor England remains extant in any form, this particular “enterlude,” John Bale’s play Kynge Johan,2 remains of particular interest to scholars for some see Johan as meriting “a particular place in the history of the theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • CYMBELINE" in the Fllii^Slhi TI CENTURY
    "CYMBELINE" IN THE fllii^SLHi TI CENTURY Bennett Jackson Submitted in partial fulfilment for the de ree of uaster of Arts in the University of Birmingham. October 1971. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. SYNOPSIS This thesis consists of an Introduction, followed by Part I (chapters 1-2) in which nineteenth- century criticism of the play is discussed, particular attention being paid to Helen Faucit's essay on Imogen, and its relationship to her playing of the role. In Part II the stags-history of Oymbcline in London is traced from 1785 to Irving's Lyceum production of 1896. Directions from promptbooks used by G-.P. Cooke, W.C. Macready, Helen Eaucit, and Samuel ±helps are transcribed and discussed, and in the last chapter the influence of Bernard Shaw on Ellen Terry's Imogen is considered in the light of their correspondence and the actress's rehearsal copies of the play. There are three appendices: a list of performances; transcriptions of two newspaper reviews (from 1843 and 1864) and one private diary (Gordon Crosse's notes on the Lyceum Gymbeline); and discussion of one of the promptbooks prepared for Charles Kean's projected production.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyd and Shakespeare: Authorship, Influence, and Collaboration
    Kyd and Shakespeare: Authorship, Influence, and Collaboration Darren Anthony Freebury-Jones A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Cardiff University 2016 Abstract The aim of this thesis is to establish the canon of Thomas Kyd’s plays and to explore Shakespeare’s relationship with that oeuvre. Chapter One begins by examining Shakespeare’s verbal indebtedness to plays that have been attributed to Kyd for over two centuries, including The Spanish Tragedy (1587), Soliman and Perseda (1588), and The True Chronicle History of King Leir (1589). The first chapter argues that Shakespeare’s extensive knowledge of Kyd’s plays contributed towards the development of his dramatic language. The second chapter provides an overview of some of the complex methods for identifying authors utilized throughout the thesis. Chapter Three then seeks to establish a fuller account of Kyd’s dramatic canon through a variety of authorship tests, arguing that in addition to the three plays above Arden of Faversham (1590), Fair Em (1590), and Cornelia (1594) should be attributed to Kyd as sole authored texts. The fourth chapter examines the internal evidence for Kyd’s hand in Shakespeare’s Henry VI Part One (1592). The chapter contends that Shakespeare’s chronicle history play was originally written by Kyd and Thomas Nashe for the Lord Strange’s Men, and that Shakespeare subsequently added three scenes for the Lord Chamberlain’s Men. The fifth chapter argues that Shakespeare and Kyd collaborated on The Reign of King Edward III (1593) and that Kyd should thus be recognized as one of Shakespeare’s earliest co-authors.
    [Show full text]
  • King John Take Place in the Thirteenth Century, Well Before Shakespeare’S Other English History Plays
    Folger Shakespeare Library https://shakespeare.folger.edu/ Get even more from the Folger You can get your own copy of this text to keep. Purchase a full copy to get the text, plus explanatory notes, illustrations, and more. Buy a copy Contents From the Director of the Folger Shakespeare Library Front Textual Introduction Matter Synopsis Characters in the Play ACT 1 Scene 1 ACT 2 Scene 1 Scene 1 Scene 2 ACT 3 Scene 3 Scene 4 Scene 1 ACT 4 Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 ACT 5 Scene 4 Scene 5 Scene 6 Scene 7 From the Director of the Folger Shakespeare Library It is hard to imagine a world without Shakespeare. Since their composition four hundred years ago, Shakespeare’s plays and poems have traveled the globe, inviting those who see and read his works to make them their own. Readers of the New Folger Editions are part of this ongoing process of “taking up Shakespeare,” finding our own thoughts and feelings in language that strikes us as old or unusual and, for that very reason, new. We still struggle to keep up with a writer who could think a mile a minute, whose words paint pictures that shift like clouds. These expertly edited texts are presented to the public as a resource for study, artistic adaptation, and enjoyment. By making the classic texts of the New Folger Editions available in electronic form as The Folger Shakespeare (formerly Folger Digital Texts), we place a trusted resource in the hands of anyone who wants them.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet and the Invention of Tragedy1
    Hamlet and the invention of Tragedy1 Helen Cooper UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, OXFORD The first thing that should be said about Hamlet is that he is a serial killer. He kills off a higher proportion of the speaking cast list, either directly with his own hand or indirectly, than any other Shakespearean character, including Richard III and Macbeth. To begin with, his victims include the entire Polonius family. He kills Polonius deliberately, though it is true that he believes him to be someone else at the time; but such an instance of mistaken identity, of killing B when one had set out with the intention of killing A, is not acceptable as an excuse for murder in a court of law. Laertes he kills with his own hand, though inadvertently; the text leaves open the opportunity, taken up in many productions, to have Hamlet engineer the change of swords deliberately as result of realizing that Laertes’ is unbated, but he cannot know that it is poisoned. Ophelia’s death he causes indirectly, but there can be no question but that he carries total moral responsibility for it, first tendering her affection, then proceeding through public humiliation to private violent abuse, and finally murdering her father. The First Quarto has Laertes make the double accusation of responsibility for the catastrophes to both Polonius and Ophelia explicit: Griefe upon griefe, my father murdered, My sister thus distracted: Cursed be his soule that wrought this wicked act.2 At no point, however, does Hamlet acknowledge his own role in bringing about her death, nor does he show any compunction over it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tragédia De Macbeth (The Tragedy of Macbeth)
    W E I L R L WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE I A A M E S P H S A E K K E S A A vida é apenas uma sombra errante, um mau ator P E H A S A se pavonear e afligir no seu momento sobre o palco R E do qual nada mais se ouve. É uma história E M Contada por um idiota, cheia de som e fúria, A tragédia de A I Significando nada. L A tragédia de MACBETH A tragédia de Macbeth L I W MACBETH Tradução Rafael Raffaelli William Shakespeare provavelmente finalizou A tragédia de Tradução Edição bilíngue Inglês e Português Macbeth em 1606. Densa, enigmática, estranha, sinistra, Rafael Raffaelli não são poucos os adjetivos para qualificar essa notável tragédia em cinco atos, que é considerada pela crítica uma de suas mais importantes obras. Embora possa ser interpretada como uma tragédia da ambição, Shakespeare vai além da análise da personalidade dos personagens e suas motivações, versando com maestria única sobre a sempiterna questão da editora ufsc www.editora.ufsc.br 9 788532 807847 origem do Mal. A tragédia de Macbeth The tragedy of Macbeth UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA Reitor Luiz Carlos Cancellier de Olivo Vice-Reitora Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann EDITORA DA UFSC Diretora Executiva Gleisy R. B. Fachin Conselho Editorial Gleisy R. B. Fachin (Presidente) Ana Lice Brancher Andreia Guerini Clélia Maria Lima de Mello e Campigotto João Luiz Dornelles Bastos Kátia Maheirie Luis Alberto Gómez Marilda Aparecida de Oliveira Effting Editora da UFSC Campus Universitário – Trindade Caixa Postal 476 88010-970 – Florianópolis-SC Fone: (48) 3721-9408 [email protected] www.editora.ufsc.br
    [Show full text]
  • Schuler Dissertation Final Document
    COUNSEL, POLITICAL RHETORIC, AND THE CHRONICLE HISTORY PLAY: REPRESENTING COUNCILIAR RULE, 1588-1603 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Anne-Marie E. Schuler, B.M., M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor Richard Dutton, Advisor Professor Luke Wilson Professor Alan B. Farmer Professor Jennifer Higginbotham Copyright by Anne-Marie E. Schuler 2011 ABSTRACT This dissertation advances an account of how the genre of the chronicle history play enacts conciliar rule, by reflecting Renaissance models of counsel that predominated in Tudor political theory. As the texts of Renaissance political theorists and pamphleteers demonstrate, writers did not believe that kings and queens ruled by themselves, but that counsel was required to ensure that the monarch ruled virtuously and kept ties to the actual conditions of the people. Yet, within these writings, counsel was not a singular concept, and the work of historians such as John Guy, Patrick Collinson, and Ann McLaren shows that “counsel” referred to numerous paradigms and traditions. These theories of counsel were influenced by a variety of intellectual movements including humanist-classical formulations of monarchy, constitutionalism, and constructions of a “mixed monarchy” or a corporate body politic. Because the rhetoric of counsel was embedded in the language that men and women used to discuss politics, I argue that the plays perform a kind of cultural work, usually reserved for literature, that reflects, heightens, and critiques political life and the issues surrounding conceptions of conciliar rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Performances from 1974 to 2020
    Performances from 1974 to 2020 2019-20 December 1 & 2, 2018 Michael Slon, Conductor September 28 & 29, 2019 Family Holiday Concerts Benjamin Rous, Conductor MOZART Symphony No. 32 February 16 & 17, 2019 ROUSTOM Ramal Benjamin Rous, Conductor BRAHMS Piano Concerto No. 2 in B-flat Major RAVEL Pavane pour une infante défunte RAVEL Piano Concerto in G Major November 16 & 17, 2019 MOYA Siempre Lunes, Siempre Marzo Benjamin Rous & Michael Slon, Conductors KODALY Variations on a HunGarian FolksonG MONTGOMERY Caught by the Wind ‘The Peacock’ RICHARD STRAUSS Horn Concerto No. 1 in E-flat Major March 23 & 24, 2019 MENDELSSOHN Psalm 42 Benjamin Rous, Conductor BRUCKNER Te Deum in C Major BARTOK Violin Concerto No. 2 MENDELSSOHN Symphony No. 4 in A Major December 6 & 7, 2019 Michael Slon, Conductor April 27 & 28, 2019 Family Holiday Concerts Benjamin Rous, Conductor WAGNER Prelude from Parsifal February 15 & 16, 2020 SCHUMANN Piano Concerto in A minor Benjamin Rous, Conductor SHATIN PipinG the Earth BUTTERWORTH A Shropshire Lad RESPIGHI Pines of Rome BRITTEN Nocturne GRACE WILLIAMS Elegy for String Orchestra June 1, 2019 VAUGHAN WILLIAMS On Wenlock Edge Benjamin Rous, Conductor ARNOLD Tam o’Shanter Overture Pops at the Paramount 2018-19 2017-18 September 29 & 30, 2018 September 23 & 24, 2017 Benjamin Rous, Conductor Benjamin Rous, Conductor BOWEN Concerto in C minor for Viola WALKER Lyric for StrinGs and Orchestra ADAMS Short Ride in a Fast Machine MUSGRAVE SonG of the Enchanter MOZART Clarinet Concerto in A Major SIBELIUS Symphony No. 2 in D Major BEETHOVEN Symphony No. 7 in A Major November 17 & 18, 2018 October 6, 2017 Damon Gupton, Conductor Michael Slon, Conductor ROSSINI Overture to Semiramide UVA Bicentennial Celebration BARBER Violin Concerto WALKER Lyric for StrinGs TCHAIKOVSKY Symphony No.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare Apocrypha” Peter Kirwan
    The First Collected “Shakespeare Apocrypha” Peter Kirwan he disparate group of early modern plays still referred to by many Tcritics as the “Shakespeare Apocrypha” take their dubious attributions to Shakespeare from a variety of sources. Many of these attributions are external, such as the explicit references on the title pages of The London Prodigal (1605), A Yorkshire Tragedy (1608), 1 Sir John Oldcastle (1619), The Troublesome Raigne of King John (1622), The Birth of Merlin (1662), and (more ambiguously) the initials on the title pages of Locrine (1595), Thomas Lord Cromwell (1602), and The Puritan (1607). Others, including Edward III, Arden of Faversham, Sir Thomas More, and many more, have been attributed much later on the basis of internal evidence. The first collection of disputed plays under Shakespeare’s name is usually understood to be the second impression of the Third Folio in 1664, which “added seven Playes, never before Printed in Folio.”1 Yet there is some evidence of an interest in dubitanda before the Restoration. The case of the Pavier quar- tos, which included Oldcastle and Yorkshire Tragedy among authentic plays and variant quartos in 1619, has been amply discussed elsewhere as an early attempt to create a canon of texts that readers would have understood as “Shakespeare’s,” despite later critical division of these plays into categories of “authentic” and “spu- rious,” which was then supplanted by the canon presented in the 1623 Folio.2 I would like to attend, however, to a much more rarely examined early collection of plays—Mucedorus, Fair Em, and The Merry Devil of Edmonton, all included in C.
    [Show full text]
  • VII Shakespeare
    VII Shakespeare BRETT GREATLEY-HIRSCH, PETER J. SMITH, ELISABETTA TARANTINO, DOMENICO LOVASCIO, SHIRLEY BELL, CHRISTIAN GRIFFITHS, KATE WILKINSON, SHEILAGH ILONA O’BRIEN, AND LOUISE POWELL This chapter has three sections: 1. Editions and Textual Studies; 2. Shakespeare in the Theatre; 3. Criticism. Section 1 is by Brett Greatley- Hirsch; section 2 is by Peter J. Smith; section 3(a) is by Elisabetta Tarantino; section 3(b) is by Domenico Lovascio; section 3(c) is by Shirley Bell; section 3(d) is by Christian Griffiths; section 3(e) is by Kate Wilkinson; section 3(f) is by Sheilagh Ilona O’Brien; section 3(g) is by Louise Powell. 1. Editions and Textual Studies Readers will, I hope, forgive the relative brevity and narrow scope of this section as a necessary consequence of accepting the YWES brief three-quarters into the year. To avoid piecemeal, superficial treatment of the full range of this year’s offerings in Shakespearean textual studies, I limit my focus to a more manageable section of scholarship: studies in authorship attribution and the apocrypha. My discussion thus excludes a great deal of interesting and important work across a field whose vibrancy and rapid evolution is reflected by the range of topics brought together in Margaret Jane Kidnie and Sonia Massai’s Shakespeare and Textual Studies (CUP). My capacity as interim caretaker of this section similarly does not allow me to give the third edition of The Norton Shakespeare (Norton) and three impressive monographs — Laura Estill’s Dramatic Extracts in Seventeenth-Century English Manuscripts (UDelP), Judith Milhous and Robert D.
    [Show full text]