SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS AFFECTING

IMPROVEMENTS IN THE COLD

SODA PULPING !PROCESS

No 2101 December 1957

INFORMATION REVIEWED AND REAFFIRMED 1965

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY FOREST SERVICE MADISON 5 WISCONSIN In Cooperation with the University of Wisconsin SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS AFFECTING IMPROVEMENTS 1 IN THE COLD SODA PULPING PROCESS —

By

KENTON J. BROWN, Chemical Engineer

Forest Products Laboratory, 2— Forest Service U. S. Department of Agriculture

Summary

The cold soda process, a high-yield semichemical-type pulping method de- veloped at the Forest Products Laboratory, was applied to several hard- woods to determine the effect of certain variables on liquor penetration, opacity, and color. The species tested included aspen (Populus tremu- loides), birch (Betula papyrifera), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), soft maple (Acer spp. ), northern red and white oaks (Quercus spp. ), elm (Ulmus spp. ), ash (Fraxinus spp. ), and yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis).

The primary results were as follows: (1) The amount of caustic soda liquor absorbed by aspen and southern red oak woods was increased by (a) decreas- ing the moisture content of the wood, (b) decreasing the particle size, (c) increasing the hydrostatic pressure in the treating vessel, or (d) removing the air from the wood prior to treatment.

(2) For a given yield, an increase in the temperature during cold soda pulp- ing decreased the opacity of the bleached pulp.

(3) Increased refining in disk mills decreased the freeness, increased the amount of fine fibers, and increased the opacity of the pulp.

-Presented at the Sixth Annual Pulp and Paper Conference held at the College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla. , December 2, 1957.

—2 Maintained at Madison, Wis. , in cooperation with the University of Wis- consin.

Rept. No. 2101 -1- Agriculture-Madison (4) Increased brightening of cold soda pulp with calcium hypochlorite de- creased its opacity at a given density.

(5) Wet pressing bleached cold soda pulps with increasing amounts of pres- sure increased their density and strength but decreased both their opacity and brightness.

(6) Screw pressing aspen chips after they were treated with caustic soda and before they were fiberized increased the pulp brightness about 5 per- centage points and appeared to remove some of its characteristic yellow color.

(7) The addition of anionic and nonionic surfactants to the caustic soda treat- ing liquor slightly increased the strength, and in some cases the brightness, of cold soda pulps made from southern red oak.

Introduction

There has been much evidence during recent months of increasing interest by the in the cold soda pulping process. The process, a semichemical-type pulping method developed at the Forest Products Lab- oratory, is now being used commercially in the United States to produce pulps from hardwoods for use in the manufacture of corrugating medium and . A European mill has begun to make toilet tissue from cold soda pulp. Other types of paper and board products may also find use for this pulp as further research promises to develop the process in the direc- tion of greater versatility and more economical processing.

Basically, cold soda pulping consists of treating chips with a sodium hy- droxide solution, draining off excess liquor, and fiberizing the softened chips in a disk mill. The process will operate satisfactorily at or slightly above room temperature. A chemical treatment of 1 to 2 hours is customary for steeps made at atmospheric pressure. The steeping time can be shortened to 30 minutes or less by applying hydrostatic pressure to the liquor surround- ing the chips in the treating vessel.

Possibilities for conducting the process continuously are constantly being explored. It appears from results at the Forest Products Laboratory that cold soda pulps of good quality can be made by applying the caustic soda solution at the same time the chips are being broken down in a refining-type mill.-3 In this case the distribution of the chemical to individual fibers is 3 —Brown, K. J. and Hilton, R. D. New Fast Continuous Cold Soda Hardwood Pulping Process. Paper Trade Journal, Vol. 10, No. 21, pp. 42-46.

Rept. No. 2.101 -2- accomplished in a matter of seconds, and the advantages of continuous operation, uniformity, and better quality control are realized. An import- ant feature of this particular continuous method is that there is no drain off and subsequent reuse of liquors that are contaminated with dissolved organic matter, which in the batch methods of treating will eventually darken the pulp.

Cold soda pulps that are produced from hardwoods at yields of about 92 per- cent are being used as partial substitutes for softwood groundwood pulps in printing papers. Using hardwoods for this purpose appears to be one of the more promising means of meeting the future fiber requirements of the indus- try. Before this can be done more extensively, however, certain quality problems must be solved. On the credit side, cold soda groundwood-type pulps from hardwood are usually slightly stronger and higher in freeness than the softwood groundwood pulps they are to replace (table 1). However, they are also denser and contain fewer fine fibers, two factors that make them more transparent than softwood groundwood. Furthermore, cold soda pulps prepared from dense hardwoods are somewhat darker than conven-. tional groundwood pulps and have to be bleached for some uses.

Cold soda pulps for corrugating board are necessarily made stronger than the groundwood-type pulps by using larger amounts of caustic soda. The optimum yield for pulp of this quality is usually 87 percent. Amounts of material required to produce pulps from certain representative hardwoods by this process (and bleach them in the case of groundwood substitutes) are listed in table 2.

The cold soda process appears to be the least expensive of the chemical or semichemical processes now available. Examples of estimated costs of making cold soda and groundwood pulps are given in table 3. In comparison to softwood groundwood pulp, the extra cost for chemicals used in producing hardwood cold soda pulp in the northern United States would be more than offset by savings in wood and in costs for fiberizing energy. Energy required to fiberize cold soda pulps made from southern oaks and gums is about one half of that used to grind southern pines, but in this case the costs are about the same. The total cost of manufacturing pulp by these two methods in the southern United States would be nearly the same if the cold soda pulp could be used unbleached.

Operating costs in the cold soda process could be lowered if shorter treating periods and more efficient use of the chemical could be accomplished. This means using improved methods to disperse minimum amounts of caustic soda quickly and uniformly to all of the fibers in the chip. Some factors to con- sider in experimentation on this problem of liquor distribution are the effects of using forced penetration mechanisms, air removal procedures, and chemical

Rept. No. 2101 -3- additives in applying the caustic soda solution. The size and moisture con- tent of the chips are also important factors. One of the purposes of this report is to review the results of some of the recent research made on penetration of caustic soda liquor at the Forest Products Laboratory and discuss their significance in connection with improving the process.

Other pulping studies reported here were concerned with improving the optical properties of cold soda pulps. In addition to lacking opacity and be- ing darker in color than groundwood pulps, they have a yellow color that persists even after bleaching by conventional single-stage methods. These experiments were designed primarily to obtain an understanding of the opti- cal characteristics of cold soda pulps so that future research can be directed at the sources of the problems.

Experimental

Tests were made on southern red oak and eight other hardwoods. The other hardwoods, representative of the forests in the northern United States, in- cluded aspen and paper birch (which were tested individually), and a mixture of soft maple, red oak, white oak, elm, ash, and yellow birch. All the pulp- wood was peeled and, unless otherwise stated, converted into standard- sized 5/8-inch chips for pulping experiments. Blocks used for penetration studies were cut from the heartwood of southern red oak logs.

Liquor Absorption Variables

Pressure. --These expekiments were designed to study both natural penetra- tion and forced penetration at room temperature. The blocks of southern red oak heartwood were treated with a solution of 50 grams of caustic soda per liter at atmospheric pressure and under a hydrostatic pressure of 150 pounds per square inch (gage) for periods of 0.5 and 2 hours at 25° C. Pre- vious penetration studies made with caustic soda liquor on aspen blocks in- dicated that 150 pounds per square inch (gage) was the most practical pres- sure for hydrostatic treatment in this process./

The blocks were cubes with sides of 0.5, 1, or 2 inches. Treatments were made on several samples at a time (usually 5) placed in a wire basket that 4 —Brown, K. J. Aspects of Cold Soda Pulping in Relation to Penetration. Annual Technical Conference, American Paper and Pulp Association Committee on Coordination of Research. Report No. 9, pp. 28-32; June 2, 1953.

Rept. No. 2101 -4- was suspended in a stainless steel autoclave of 0.8-cubic-foot capacity. The amount of solution absorbed by the blocks was determined from the differ- ence in weight before and after the treatment. The extent of penetration through the blocks was observed by splitting them longitudinally and dusting phenolphthalein powder on the face of the split section to clearly outline the presence of alkali. Typical sections of blocks from these tests are shown in figure 1.

As shown in table 4, 2-inch blocks of red oak heartwood with a moisture content of 10 percent picked up 5 times more liquor in 0.5 hour at 150 pounds per square inch (gage) pressure than they did at atmospheric pressure. The blocks soaked for 2 hours at atmospheric conditions absorbed only 30 percent as much liquor as those impregnated with hydrostatic pressure for 30 minutes. Results of tests made on blocks that contained 35 percent moisture showed the same beneficial effects of increasing pressure but to a lesser degree (table 4).

Vacuum. --A vacuum of 26 inches of mercury was drawn on the 2-inch blocks and held for 5 minutes before the caustic soda liquor entered the autoclave. The extent of penetration into the blocks that contained 10 percent moisture was increased considerably by preevacuating the wood before it was steeped at atmospheric pressure, as shown in figure 2. Preevacuation also improved results of the hydrostatic treatment but to a lesser extent. Absorption values in table 4 show that removing the air from the wood before the blocks were steeped at atmospheric pressure was as effective as applying a hydrostatic pressure for 30 minutes. Recent cold soda pulping tests made on green aspen that contained 47 percent moisture also showed benefits from pre- evacuation. 5

Particle size. --Decreasing the dimensions of the red oak cubes in the range from 2 inches on a side to 0.5 inch increased the liquor absorption in a range of from 60.0 to 82.8 percent during treatments of 30 minutes at 150 pounds per square inch (gage)(table 4). This increased absorption was probably due only to the greater amount of surface for a given weight on the smaller blocks; as shown in figure 1, the liquor had penetrated through only the open struc- ture of the wood (vessels) and had left the surrounding dense fiber structure untreated to about the same extent in blocks of each size.

Cold soda pulping tests were made on predisintegrated aspen chips and com- pared to those made on standard full-sized chips. The small chips were pre- pared by passing normal chips through breaker plates in an 8-inch disk mill,

5 —Brown, K. J. and Mons son, W. H. Cold Soda Pulping of Aspen by Im- proved Methods. Tappi, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 592-599.

Rept. No. 2101 -5- and accepting the particles passing a 1/8-inch screen but held on one of 1/16-inch mesh. The average dimensions of these particles were 1/16 inch in both the radial and tangential directions and 5/8 inch in the longitudinal fiber direction. Comparisons of pulping tests made at both atmospheric pressure and hydrostatic pressure after preevacuation on both sizes of chips are given in table 5. After 2 hours of steeping at atmospheric pressure, the liquor penetration in the small particles was complete but the larger chips had dry centers. Penetration was found to be complete in both cases after the forced penetration treatments. Under both conditions of pulping the amount of liquor absorbed, and consequently consumed, was increased considerably by decreasing the chip size. The increased consumption of chemical decreased the pulp yield about 4 percent. Preparing the small chip particles probably did some damage to fibers since the pulps prepared from them had bursting strengths about 10 percent lower in each case (table 5).

Moisture content. --As shown in table 4, when the moisture content of the red oak 1-inch blocks was decreased from 35 to 10 percent, the amount of liquor absorbed in 30 minutes at 150 pounds per square inch (gage) was increased about three times. The effect on cold soda pulping of a decrease in the mois- ture content of aspen chips from 46 to 7 percent is shown in table 5. The drier chips absorbed 60 percent more liquor and produced 3.5 percent less pulp after being treated 10 minutes at 150 pounds per square inch (gage) following preevacuation. The difference in moisture content had no signifi- cant effect on pulp strength, which substantiates results of other experi- ments on green and air-dry aspen reported previously. —5

Surfactants. --Standard-sized chips and 1-inch cubes prepared from southern red oak were treated with caustic soda liquors containing varying concentra- tions of several different types of surface-active agents to determine their effects on the rate of penetration and pulping characteristics in this process. Examples of typical results are given in tables 4 and 6. Adding 10 grams per liter of an anionic surfactant to the liquor increased by about 50 percent the amount of liquor absorbed by the air-dry blocks during 2 hours' atmos- pheric steeping (table 4). Blocks containing 35 percent moisture picked up only 30 percent more liquor with the surfactant present under similar con- ditions.

In contrast to the above, the addition of surfactants of both anionic and nonionic types to liquors used in treating red oak chips (containing 23 per- cent moisture) decreased slightly the amount of liquor absorbed (table 6). The presence of the surfactants did not affect pulp yield nor did it change the chip softening effect (measured by the fiberizing energy) of the caustic soda liquor. The strength properties of cold soda pulps made by both the

Rept. No. 2101 - 6 - batch and continuous methods, using conditions described in table 6, were increased slightly by the addition of surfactants. Adding 5 grams per liter of an anionic surfactant to the liquor in the continuous system increased the pulp brightness from 40.2 to 42.4 percent. Pressing the treated chips (con- taining the surfactant) before the fiberizing operation increased the bright- ness still further to 43.7 percent.

Results of other block tests (not tabulated here) with both anionic and non- ionic surfactants showed that in each case a concentration of 10 grams per liter was more effective than either 5 or 20 grams per liter. In a cold soda pulping solution, use of 10 grams per liter of a surfactant that cost 20 cents per pound would increase the cost of a ton of cold soda pulp about $4.50.

Presteaming. --The effectiveness of using steam to replace air in chips, and thereby improve penetration in the cold soda process, was investigated. Each of the presteaming methods described in table 7 increased the rate at which caustic soda liquor penetrated into paper birch chips, but only the mildest conditions of steaming gave satisfactory pulping results. Applying steam at a pressure of 5 pounds per square inch (gage) for 30 minutes be- fore the caustic soda treatment did not change the pulp yield, but did increase the bursting strength about 5 percent in comparison with a treatment made at 55° C. without presteaming. Using the technique of "purging" the chips with steam at pressures of 25 and 50 pounds per square inch (gage) seriously de- creased the pulp yield and strength (table 7). The increased darkening of the pulp at pulping temperatures higher than normal would probably limit this method to production of pulp for such products as corrugating board.

Optical Properties

In making printing papers that contain cold soda pulp, the opacity, bright- ness, and color of the paper depend on the careful control of conditions dur- ing the pulping, refining, bleaching, and operations. Since each step in preparing the pulp and making the paper has a number of vari- ables, many of which are interdependent, the problem of producing paper with optimum optical properties from cold soda pulp is complex. The fol- lowing discussion contains typical examples of basic information needed on the effect of the variables before the proper paths toward improvements can be chosen.

Pulping temperature. --An investigation was made to determine the effect of the treating temperature on the opacity and strength of cold soda pulps pro- duced at the same level of yield. Chips from a mixture of 6 hardwoods typical of the north-central region (50 percent, by weight, of soft maple and

Rept. No. 2101 -7- 10 percent each of red oak, white oak, elm, ash, and yellow birch) were treated with varying concentrations of caustic soda at different tempera- tures. A caustic soda concentration of 30 grams per liter at a temperature of 25° C. produced a yield of 91.5 percent; 17 grams per liter at 55° C. produced a pulp yield of 92.3 percent; and 9 grams per liter at 85° C. pro- vided a yield of 90.6 percent. The cold soda pulps produced from these treatments were refined by circulation through an 8-inch disk mill and samples were taken at freenesses of approximately 300, 200, and 100 milli- liters (Canadian Standard). Each pulp sample was bleached with calcium hypochlorite at both a 6 and 12 percent available chlorine level. Handsheets prepared from the pulps at a weight of 37 pounds per ream (500 sheets, 25 by 40 inches) were tested for opacity, brightness, and strength. Screen fractionation tests were also made on each pulp.

The results of the study are shown graphically in figure 3. Opacity values interpolated at a constant brightness of 68 percent decreased as the pulping temperature was increased. This effect was most pronounced for the pulps of low freeness. Figure 3 also shows that decreasing the freeness increases the opacity. For example, decreasing the freeness of pulp (produced at 25' C. ) from 300 to 100 milliliters increased the opacity of the sheet about 4 percentage points at a brightness of 68 percent.

Other results obtained in this study were as follows: (1) Opacity, at a con- stant brightness, increased as the fraction of fine fibers was increased. (2) At an average pulp yield of about 91.5 percent, the amount of caustic soda consumed was not changed by variations in treating temperature. (3) The brightness of the unbleached pulps decreased from about 40 to 37.5 percent as the pulping temperature was increased in this range. 6 Refining. --According to Parsons, — the amount of light scattered by pulp in a sheet can be increased by increasing the unbonded fiber surface area in the sheet. This increase in light scattering power, and resultant increase in opacity, could be presumably brought about by either (1) cutting the fibers into smaller particles to increase the surface area or (2) using less pressure in wet pressing the sheet to decrease the bonded surface. The purpose of the work reported in this section was to determine the suitability of three types of pulp refiners to increase opacity as in (1).

Disk milling: Cold soda pulp produced from the mixture of 6 hardwoods

under conditions given in table 8 was refined to various freenesses by re- • cycling through a 36-inch-diameter double disk mill. Decreasing the pulp -Parsons, S. R. Optical Characteristics of Paper as a Function of Fiber Classification. Paper Trade Journal, Tappi Section, Vol. 115, No. 25, pp. 314-322, December 1942.

Rept. No. 2101 -8- freeness in this manner within a range of from 280 to 120 milliliters in- creased the amount of fine fibers passing through a 200-mesh screen in a range of from 23.7 to 28.0 percent. After the pulps were each bleached with 12 percent available chlorine in the form of calcium hypochlorite, tests made on handsheets showed that refining in the disk mill was effective in increasing both the opacity and strength of the pulp (table 8).

Beating: The bleached pulp from the last stage of refining in the disk mill was beaten in a test beater of 1.5-pound capacity until its freeness was about the same as that of commercial book-grade groundwood pulp. Beating in- creased the strength and density of the cold soda pulp considerably but de- creased its opacity 2 percentage points (table 8). The decrease in amount of fines after beating (table 8) might be partly caused by increased coagula- tion of hydrated fibers in the screen classifier.

Jordaning: Bleached cold soda groundwood-type pulp prepared from a mix- ture of southern red oaks was subjected to a single pass through a laboratory jordan, using a moderate amount of pressure. Handsheets made from the pulps before and after jordaning were wet pressed at pressures of 10, 100, and 300 pounds per square inch (gage). Refining this pulp in the jordan de- creased its freeness from 130 to 70 milliliters and also decreased both the opacity and brightness of sheets pressed at given pressures, as shown in figure 4. This refining action increased both the density and strength (as measured by breaking length) of the pulp. If the curves in figure 4 are used to compare the jordaned and unjordaned pulps at constant values of density and brightness in a range of wet press pressure of from 100 to 150 pounds per square inch (gage), this refining action appears to have had no effect on opacity.

Brightening. --The typical effect on opacity of brightening cold soda ground- wood-type pulp is shown in figure 5. Increasing the amount of applied avail- able chlorine from 8 to 10 percent (based on the moisture-free weight of the pulp) in bleaching a southern red oak cold soda pulp with calcium hypochlor- ite decreased its freeness from 85 to 70 milliliters and increased its bright- ness about 3 percentage points. At a given wet press pressure, this in- crease in brightness was accompanied by a decrease in the opacity of the handsheet of about 2 percentage points, as shown in figure 5. Increased brightening strengthened the pulp slightly (as measured by breaking length) without changing its density.

Wet pressing. --As indicated in figures 4 and 5, increasing the pressure dur- ing the wet pressing of cold soda pulpsheets increases both their densities and strength properties but makes them darker in color and more trans- parent.

Rept. No. 2101 -9- Pulp color. --As mentioned before, treating wood with caustic soda at low temperatures gives the fibers a yellowish cast that persists even after bleach- ing. This color becomes noticeable in printing paper if more than about 25 percent of cold soda is present in the sheet. An experiment made on aspen sawdust to determine the cause of the yellowing involved treating samples with a 50-gram-per-liter solution of caustic soda for 2 hours at atmospheric conditions after the samples had been extracted successively with ether, alcohol-benzene, and hot water. Treatment of the sawdust after each ex- traction produced the same characteristic yellow color as treatment of an unextracted sample. But the color of a sample of Cross and Bevan cellu- lose prepared from the sawdust did not change after a similar treatment with caustic soda. This result supports the common belief that the yellow color is produced by the reaction of the alkali with .

Multi-stage bleaching might be an effective way to remove the yellow color from cold soda pulp, but it would probably be costly. Experience has shown that the brightness and degree of yellowness of cold soda pulp depend partly upon the extent of washing given the pulp. In one series of experi- ments, the brightness of unbleached aspen cold soda pulp was increased from 49.0 to 54.3 percent by pressing out some of the colored liquor from the treated chips by a single pass through a screw press, before the chips were fiberized in the disk mill. Bleached pulp produced from the pressed material appeared to be somewhat less yellow. The use of surfactants in conjunction with washing operations also seems to have promise for improv- ing the color of cold soda pulp.

Conclusions

It may be concluded that:

(1) The rate of distribution of caustic soda solution to the centers of hardwood chips, during pulping by the cold soda process, can be accelerated by pre- evacuating the treating vessel, increasing the hydrostatic pressure during steeping, or decreasing the chip size.

(2) Air-dry wood absorbs more liquor, consumes more chemical, and pro- duces less cold soda pulp at a given level of strength than green wood.

(3) From the standpoint of opacity and color, optimum treating temperature in the preparation of cold soda groundwood-type pttlps is about 25° C.

(4) The opacity of bleached cold soda pulp can be increased by disk mill re- fining.

Rept. No. 2101 -10- (5) If it is important to preserve opacity, cold soda pulps should be bleached only to the minimum acceptable brightness and their densities should be kept at the minimum level necessary to obtain the desired strength in the paper.

(6) The addition of surfactants to cold soda pulping liquor accelerates its penetration into wood with low moisture content and also improves washing operations.

Rept. No. 2101 -11- 1. -25

cd -g 4-) a;-4 0 i -f-1 ma) a) a) ,0 9-1 El a) U-1 •H 0 03 pi p, _4- _4- ri4 ad 01 0 c) ▪ P-1 cd CO 4.1 cr--1 Pi0 •• • • •• •• • • •• • • •• •• •• •• •• O TJ a)

H n0 4-1 Lc-N O 0 0 0 a5 9:5 ••••., • • •• •• •• •• • • •• •• • • •• •• ••

4-3 0 r,c' n.0 LC \ rn rci • • • O P1P4 a) cd rci 0 •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• trj btO 0 -0 0 •r-i -p P ,M t30 a) a) ▪0 cd 0 4-3 a) a) a) P4 P H pa a) •• •• •• •• •. •• •• •• •• 8 ' ••• •• •• 0 rfziHI U) ▪CH I:10Ed 0 —I 0 a) O 41 g rC) 0 PI -p 0) 0 • Cd CO Pi S—I 0 0 0 a) N-I 4) -CJ E-1 EE) • P. 4-) a) el O- ro F-i 0 a) 0 •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••

a) ,o a) bit) .E1 H Hi. .H -t P 0 -I- al al O a) +) H d) E rsc'N r‘l al re\ tr\ OD a) Pi e a 0 N ti., Fa 0 Fa 11) • 0 PI4 GO 03 /24 03 • PH .0 .0 cd •lo •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••• •• •• •• •. — 0 ...-n $c).. .r. O g rd •H 03 •r1 F-1 ra a) rci cr5 0 0 0 0 0 0 no r:1 1 In —I- c.-- C--- Z H H l>. o 33 g g r-I c...) -p .0 of ro G.1 ...... , ca •• ro 1>b CUi (V a) a -P rt:5 03 -P 2 ri 1 14 .0 0 Ea a) 0 H a) rl r0 0 0 a) a) F-1 0 fi P. F-1 -P LIN g M a) a) 0 0 a) I a) 4 -0 0 0 P. 0 4-) c5 • -1 0 0 a) .0 o o 4 4 NY

Rept. No. 2101

o 0 al N- rfl 0 1.1\ tr‘ \

•• •• /• E. .11 •• •• •I1 ••

Fa

• 0 O

o 0 0 a) o 0 o tzl • 0 •r-t 0 ‘s) 0 Z 0.1 H

•• ••

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pa ...._, .0 .0 K.0 \O ,a F-1 N •• .• •/ I • Fi 44. .. C_) cc$ CD FA 0 u-\ 0 9-1 W omNPrn If\ N t..r t— 0 ▪ lfl OD `may tr\ o O H 0 4-, •. •• •• • • F-1 a) rn \.0 4-) • 0

0 r14 Pa •• •• 4. •• .4 •• of a 0 0 • • NCU 0 0 0 O • 4-3 k.0 n0 Ei \O c0 co 0 as H N1 r-4 H k I •• •• •• .. - •• • . • • •• O -p 9-i -P CO rc1 rd c0 O O 0 • P• •∎ O H F-1 0 0 *ri o' 41) C.) .4 a) Pi 0 Pi d rci •• •• •• •• •M old H a) to O Pi F-1 CO -P 9 '8 rci CO 0 0 4-) O ,M F•1 H 0.1 4-4 O o F-1 o o a) o o 0 P .1.0 •• •• •• •• .. .. •• .• •• •• • • .. a) Na) 4.4 0 Eli 0 a) 9-1 4-4 0 gO 0 0 $-1 a) a) 0 4-) .0 \ 0 .-Sci 0 CO 0 Eli 0 ca 0 0 •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• 0 0 I i 'el rc$ a) al al 9 rg a) a) ,cl rcl 9 '8 ,c1 rizi 0 H 0 o 0 H 0 0 0 cd 0 a) F-1 3 o co PI 3 P:1 0 Ch 0 cb r-11

Rept . No. 2101 • • • • • • a) • • • o 0 0 0 CV N 0 • • 0 -P a) T-1 ON ON t•-- . • bD O 0 • • acrd F1 H • • -1-> a) a) • • ao qj P1 0 • • 1 0 • • a) a) o • • • • • • • • • • • p H •• H i • • 0 r0 03 •-I 03 . 4:1) CO co CO . bD co r-I 4. 1 0 0 CO COO • • 0 0 r-1 • • H 0 a) 1-1 • • a) H • • •ci pi rb-I Pi • • a) ',I Ed • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • Fi Pi 0 ad r-I rci 4-) ga ci-1 c),4 R2 0 ci a) ,0 --1- ON \.0 a) 0 i ...1. __.1. eNt--1- rill CM CM ep 4 H 4-4 • Cn O -P 4-) 0,.1..'' W 0 LEI T3 .0 0 -P 3-I 3-1 0 ad 0 •H • • • • O 0 0 o •0 Ri O a) 0 r-4 TS P • I W u-N in rt-N 14 If \ LC \ ,c3 ro q o O ----O L . n.0 If N Pi U N r'rn m Pi r--I r-I H r-It-1 .:4 ,--1 H O r-I E-4 P-r rcd 4-) a) o 0 •• i in I>b h4 pti • • • • rcl cd es -4-) q 0 4-1 rl 0 co 0 H o 0 to RP E-I H 0 rd N- CO NI t--- al 3-1 a) •-1 rs f-4 • • • (0 • • 0 4-) co -P •., o 0 H H CI-I •r4 ,0 .0 u F, ;-, g ao m d O 0 •H cd o H H a) • • •• •• •• • • o 4 r 0 0^ • 0 0 O OD rq 0 rd PI .-F0 01 a.) al CV al cc-N re \ 4-1 0 ON 0 \ Cr\ 0 \ 0 \ H [3' o nix(L) .--% 0 co lir 9 ° 8 CI-I P O 7)kF 11.) • • H 0 H -P 4-) m 0 EI .,-r a) p m ..0 a) 4-1 0 H al F-r H P ^ 0 ,. ..-1O a d PI• 1,-F d •00 ;_la) co P4 o 03 O p., . 0 .) ,y) K \ 0 0 4-) H P CO -P cd 0 H CI-10 0$:1 'CIO 'de 2 (1) ro P 00 11 47640 40 a) 0 P 0 P cd 702 cro i Pi 0 a) a) P4 .rt HII I CnI I 14-n1

Rept . No. 2101

Table 4.--Effect of vacuum, pressure, surfactant, dimensions, and moisture content on the absorption of a caustic soda solution (50 grams per liter) at room temperature by cubes of southern red oak heartwood

Cube .- ,Pre- : Pressure : Duration : Concentration : Solution dimensions : evacuation : drying : of steep : of anionic : absorbed (on each : (vacuum) : steep : : surfactant (per 100 lb. edge) . : (gage) : : : of moisture- : : : : free wood)

In. In. Hg : P.s.i. Hr. : Gm. per 1. : Lb.

MOISTURE CONTENT -- 10 PERCENT

2.0 None 0 0.5 : None 11.7 2.0 None 0 2.0 : None 17.6 2.0 None 0 2.0 : 10 26.4

2.0 None 150 .5 : None : 60.0 1.0 None 150 .5 : None : 74.0 .5 None 150 .5 : None 82.8

2.0 26 0 .5 : None 59.3 2.0 26 150 .5 : None 77.0

MOISTURE CONTENT -- 35 FEECENT

1.0 None 0 2.0 None 15.7 1.0 None 0 2.0 : 10 20.2

1.0 None 150 .5 : None 23.5 1.0 None 150 .5 : 20 32 .0

Rept. No. 2101

;-4 a) U) a) P tcl N 0 \ 0] n-.0 \ LIN 0 a) EI 0 a) rzn l• • • •• as H a) -P 0 ()A 0 a) 0 ed 0 0) tri I.Cn P4 -4) P. Pi n.0 \-C) 0 a) 0-1 S-1 W • • . . Fl 0 P-4 0 e4-1 11) 0 .0 cd 0 E-1 r-I rt-.1 0) •. a) PAO , ;-1 "0 a) 4-) ;-4 g 03 0 Pa Fr\ r– o., ...- 0 n _d- __.1- .....1- if\ ifs, a) 01 0 • • • . 0 • • 0 +)$-1 -P P:1 on P-1 rd 0 NOS O CnJ • . . 1)% • n q 1-1 N- O a) CN CO Or) ON 0-1 0) CD 4) a) up H (I) ;t L.r. __I- _._._ CO Cr 1 CT \ 0 • • • • -P E513 co r--i .--, .-I t- ..---. n-0 0 H 'Cli 1 t._) Pr.I r-1 r-1 r=.1 H H 4•1 I-I 0 r.. P4 0 •=4 1 0; M v Cr. 0 Qt a) CO • • • • . . 0 • • I-1 HI O • • • O • . in (0.• 0 •=4 • • . r-1 H Pr', ',0 • 0 1 Pr .--1- 0 P-r cO N-• •,-1 rc; • •• Fa E+ Cli rt", N H 0 a) .4 • • 0 0 0 ill • • [S.\ 1r \ P1 U) • • r-i •--1 - . .. .. CO E-1 E-I P •', .. •,-E 0 0 0 F-r En Er) W A-D 7:1 iD a) CU a-, tr.. r..1 Cr. n.0 P,-.1 0 ON 0 0 +1 41 N N __.1„ tr..4- 9 0 0 0 0 01 0 $--1 0 0 U u N 0 .0 Z •H -p • C.1 4-) 0) tr \ 0 0 MI 0 4-) H a) 0 F-1 0 a) nO C--- C-- n0 4-1 0 o_..1- ra rd •rl I-4 F-1 0 0 a) a) • • • • • • e-1 • • • • • • • • • . .• • • • • .0 to •H I>b a) 0 ,01 a) •HHI CO CO r-1 CO CO it\ .0 0 0 I -0 03 N r-I r-I r-I r-I 4-) rd 0 0 ri -H 0 0 .0 02 Cr/ LCI H 03 a) •• 0 CD 1-t (2) ‘.0 \.0 *0 A-) `H H o a) co rti H ----. r-4 ----.. rl r-1 0 E-I a) 0 0 'H H 0 .. • • .. .. A-) fn -4) 0 a) H a) ;-1 rcl 0 o _p n-0 0 co COCO 0 0 8 9 H N N N I phi

Rept. No. 2101

—' to • 0 0 --., -P H 0 01 +3 0 FI +3 o 0 a) ON ON t- 4 a) o • • • o ttO • H f-i 0 N LrN 4-1 w cd a) H FA • rel XI cb cH...... - a 0 a• •• •• •• •• •• •• i• •• •• •• •• P .• F-t co 0 -P 0 CO •r-I Pi c.; I N 0 N H M a) 2 ID g • C) I • • • • • •r4 a) a) 0 O a) 0 44 Li) P •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• 4 RIPi B co oF. . , rt4 ;11 t $4 0 0 0 0 0 to a) t- K\ 0 0 0 Pi al cd 0 -P t•"---* --1 0 If \ U CD c, ••n ... •••• 0 , a) a) a) ••• .., Pi Pi 0 F.-1 H H N -Ckl If\ Ca H al Pc1 K1 •r1 • P•g .c), • • • •• •• •• •• •• • . Xi f-i bD I H H 0 a) a)f-i -I-3 -H C.) 4-1 •1-1 0 to' a) Pi If \ H K\ In ON • • o n 0 --1. LC\ W\ VD tr\ a) --.. to 2'.1 V) 0 • • • • • 400 _IS rti)71 rill nc5 a) a) of 0 0 +) 0 F-i E-1 Ch al 0 q P.1 ai 0 •• •• •• • • . •• •• •• •• •• b0 0 rd 03 bD .0 ;_, .,,0 ,_....•, 0 0 to n R •',-9 to a 0 •-I CNI (rt lf\ teN -4-, •CI H N N N ai tc, ti- 0 0 0 ra cd CO 0 • • • • ...._.. F-I CO a) 0 trN O o H ,--t re- \ +3 4-) co tr. 1 1.--1 •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• 17•3-' •• •• •• •. .. •• •• . PI '8 4 a) C.) to u-N 44 N) -1-4 0 a) 0 1-1 N +) -P to 0 N g io7' .0 al al 9-4 $4 a) 0 tel K\ U] 0 H -I-) f-.r F-1 m o 0 0 0 0 0 f-1 0 ;./ H 1-1 •--I r-4 r-i 0 b0 Oro ,0 a) a) 0 r0ci P• .0 0 e) 4.) .•-i Pi Fi (I) 1--1 •-4 H . a) - •• •• •• •• •• ••• •• •• •• O• •• •• •• •• • . p -P m i • a) uj r'd cd 0 CJ a) Pi rIC4 I-I ON t-- 0 • • •• 9 _. rd ..--I rdH H • • • 0 • • -P 0 +3 0 -1-, 0 0 .ifil 0 a. o • . CO 0 41 F-I C13 0) +3 4 „Pi o, co un • • •,--1 ,0 m P• 0 of oo I:.•• 0 4-) • 0 ,0 ••-1 •• •• •• •• •• •• ••• •. •• •• ..• .•. r0 01 ....., 0 0 Lr\ -P 0 0 0 .---. OJIN rti 0..) H 0HI 0 -P g .0 rcl 4:1 r+--I to r0 ..--i oa) Li -N. 0. O. K\ II\ cc 4 .p ef-i 0 -P 0 P .1 • • g t-I 0 ti) U '2 g J° N C) .-I 0 '0 H mW `8 t::,' i-4 I 1-I rj 1 co • cd $4 0 4 • 0 a) to o) 0 • 0 0 •r--i U 0 co 0 0 •0 Pi f-i rci 0 of Pi --I- C.) -P -P n n •• •• •• • to .1-1 0 of 4- -.1 f-i •• •• •• • • • • • • K1 l 1: 0 g , ?_ H 0 f-1 Rz1 N 0 D CUP K\ -4-3 KI 0 " Pi a) 0 N Pi 4-3 H 0 0 0 ra N VD 0 '0 Ir1 (1./ 4-) 0 0 P4 I-I 0 Pi .I • • • a) 0 N -P Pi al u H 0 0 1-1 t— al r-I --.1- 0 *0 of 0 •r1 GO ON CO ON KN tel H 0 ., H 0 4-1 g 0 1--1 43 N N of to to FA i i-I 0 e3 -P H •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • • 0 0 -Pao 040 R 0 a) f-1 O H 0 to au • • 0 -P .0 N RI ..---. ..---.. a) 4.) -P 1-1 0 0 H If\ rii CA w .tH° Pr \ 0 a) CC$ 0 N N o 0 0 0 rd l-i • 0 F-i Pi 0 0 O 0 0+3 4-, 4-, in of od w • • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• o •• •• 0 •• to 0 0 0 0 rd a) 4-I 0 0 .01 0 •r-I 0 0 0 0 on 0 •.--I ol H 0 0 g (I H 0 0 0 a) 0 0 -H 0 CD C) (1) 0 oic r0 0 0 0 *1--1 0 •-I 0 0 al 0 0 0 • 9g :LI Z <4 g 4 , - 44 r , 4 1 KT. T. _ . .J iff

Rept . No. 2101

-P 1>b ai in -P a) tcn cn •,--1 • \SD m a) CO U • • • 0 0 g 4-1 0 a) 4-3 a) A• a) $-1 k •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• a) q-i a) Pi 0 to 0r H 5Q0 f-1 --1 11 a) C1.11 N- Pi cif .H:ri p1 rn 8 ,-,1 0 toll 0 0 co H 0 t +, CV P 0 C7 LC\ • CD 'I-1 F-I a) q •• • • • • • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• 144 IV ..0 -3I g CO F-1 tta 9--1 .19 tO Pi Ci) Odl 7:1 -I-, 0 t-- t-- n(:) O P4 M in a) • • ▪• l H g P • hi A-) 4-' (-) i • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• • • • •• •• •• n • •0 •• •• •• •• • • •• rd K\ n.0 P.11-1 4., H a) cd O TI a) a) 3 N3 cc) t-- P-1 Pa PA 0 • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • •• •• •• tr-N ;-1 F-i 0 o a) • Pi -P 4-3 (1) •r-I H if\ 0 0 ;-1 -P Pi 0 co co 0 N- 0 00 0 CC1 -1 0 +1 0 1-1 ri ca a) •1t> a) m F-4 0 ccl 2:1 (1 a) EA 4 0 Do R. 4,3 • • • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••

$-1 rcl -P • • P4 CO ON co co F-i 0 •

c.) •• O• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • ad aa 0.) of tr.\ co K1 if\ tin tt-N LC\ 0

• 0 cr3

tr"), r• • ,o a) cri I-I if\ a) in 0 a) -P 0 tO bp -P trfl if\ ;-I 4-1 cid 4-D i)3 cd itt '8 8 4-) ai ta0 g3 hal /XI 4-1 rcj ---- ..-...rim N rici 0 ?, . re t . 1)• • ••-i -P --- 0 •r-1 taD .• iall •,.1 -P 0 a) to o Cl.) "ri CO' CO. CO a) 0 0 irn • -P in 0 0 • 1:24 P4 co c.) .. 0 P-1 CV 0 cd • • • • •• • • •• • • •• • • • • •• •• • •• •• •• .. • • • . .• 4-10 K c0 On F-1FU-1 0 (11 1-1 H ai H 0\ 0\ 0\ ;-1 41-1 •a) Pi N al at o tEl 4-11 ra ..... 9-i 1-1\O H.% rel a) cal O\ ON 0 a) 4-3 CO cO On ON 01 CU CM 0.1 HV all KT

Rept. No. 2101 Figure 1. --Split sections of southern red oak blocks showing extent of caustic soda liquor penetration. The top three blocks show the effect of atmospheric steeping for 0.5 hour (left block),for 2 hours (center), and 2 hours with surfactant. The bottom series shows the extent of penetration after hydrostatic pressure treatment with 150 pounds per square inch (gage) for 0.5 hour on blocks 2 inches square (left), 1 inch square (center), and 0.5 inch square.

Z M 112 579

F-1 a) 0 CN N 0 0 0 -p -P a) • • ef-I •,--1 0 0 000 H l'el H al rcl a) F-I CO c0 CO ON 0 t144-r •,--1 0 al •o •• •• •• •• fiLl .0 0 a) TJ 0 E1-1 3-1 1 A-) cd a) 0 --- -P -0 •,-1 0 ON C- t __1- 0 -P rn 0 Cd a) • • • . 0 0 0 t-- N-00 ON 0\ Ian 0 ..-1 3-1 l0 n0 n0 VD n0 0 I -P • H )4 a) •,--I .--1- cd PA Pi H ;-4 0 +3 r1 0 0 0 1.• •• •• •• •• •• .. -P a) -Li 03 14 c.) 0 cd M n-I g rd R4 0 N PO CN ON k 0 40 0 0 tfl rcn 1.4-N n ..* gl • 0 cn 0 • • • • --1-1:1 0 Ei o al F-1 0 0 I'd 0 (1) •• •• •• .r4 H A • • ..• • •c 0 •• 0 NN -P CH 0 0 ,n4 3 0 N •H (1) U cu I. cr) A H F-1 H 0 rd rd Cf) P sq 0 P 3-1 O\ CO Ef\ rq- 0 L(\ cc w a) a) .-0 0 al KN UN \O p4 In , - ^ Pi -p PPai 3-. ci • • 0 cd 0 o 0 .—I 0 co O a) 41 0 tta H 0 W S-1 0 0 P tiC1 F-i •• •• •• •• • • • • M rC5 P - CD 1:1 •••••• t10 E (1 i !)a ci-1 a) ad 0 rc:P O ro tr, n-i NI 1 0 al H I P:1 ,PI 0 • 'al H FA cm n -I- In C.-- m ..-I 9-1 0 H ri N -4- 14 N CH0 0 0, rri Pi 4-) P-1 • • • 0 0 ,EI co ca 1-1 0 q PI 1-1 0 C.) a) r5,1 0 c) a) 0 0 3.4 A (1-1 co Pi 1..1 IA 0 9--I •H 0 +3 0 rl 0 w ., co 4-) P-i rd Pa ii co ca 0 0 •• •• •• P •• •• •• •• H A- ca ra ') cd 0N ci-i i-0, ca0 c:1 0 O H O -0 -P.. 0 0 $-1 0 ttO cO O Pr riF-1 ' O 0 0 •H 0 a) a) a) t---- LC \ 0 o a) 0 0 .__ •.-i -P -4 -P •H 0 , 0 O • • • ' • In Pi -P 0 • -/-3 4 U a) I 34 F-I 64-\ \ON cal0 \CD KN 'Cif' H-P al H a) cd op 0 a) N _1- 0 a) 0 cH 3-1 cd 0 co 12-f P ';' -...0 , cr CH N .H 0 Xi Ca Cd a) cz1- .• •• •• •• • • I • •• •• •• • • 0 PI C..) +3 4-) Pi 0 cd co• rd cd 0 ai a)rdr -H tr1 .0 rd 3-4 CO M cd .1 LIN 0 11 F-4 ...0 CO 0 •,-I 0 0 ad rd H c00 -.-1-0 \O N" a) N N $-10 +3 :PH -----. 0 101 'El+) ;.-I0 (I)a) 4-1 cd 0\0 no $_ia) 4- $-1 U -P ad 1=.1 to rilif) ;-P r-i Pi 0 TS 1-1•• • • •• • •• •• • • . •• •• •• •• • • 0 _4- q-I (1) 0 0 CO 2 -'-'im • 3-r cd a) a) 0 ,si n-•1 Pi O.) 0 0 0 Pi Pi "0 4-1 al 0 In H H N (*("N NTh O H 40 cd H a) O 03 .1-I n-I 3.-1 a) S-I cd .0 rc3 0 1;q , la-E, Z A -P r-i t al 1 Wm -1- I

Rept . No. 2101

UNEVA VACUATED

Figure 2. --Split sections of southern red oak blocks showing the effect on caustic soda liquor penetration of removing air before atmospheric and hydrostatic impregnation. All blocks were impregnated for one- half hour but upper pair were treated at atmospheric pressure and lower pair at a pressure of 150 pounds per square inch (gage).

ZM112580