DOCSLIB.ORG

Feasibility Study and Aspirational Masterplan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feasibility Study and Aspirational Masterplan EXECUTIVE DECISION RECORDING SYSTEM REFERENCE NO: 08090136 DELEGATED REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REGENERATION 16 SEPTEMBER 2008 MOSTON BROOK GREEN CORRIDOR - FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ASPIRATIONAL MASTERPLAN REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REGENERATION AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 To provide information on the Moston Brook Green corridor initiative, in particular the completion of a Feasibility Study and the production of an Aspirational Master- plan for the area. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 The Moston Brook Green Corridor is a strategically important 60 hectares area of green space that stretches from the Rochdale Canal at Failsworth, to Dean Lane in East Manchester. Designated as protected open space, the Corridor contains areas of biological importance and is a space used for both recreation and antisocial behaviour. Despite its greenspace value, strategic location and proximity to major regeneration sites, Moston Brook is currently failing to achieve its full potential. 2.2 Following the establishment of the Moston Brook Partnership, funding from the two local authorities (Oldham and Manchester) was used to commission a Feasibility Study and Aspirational Masterplan for the Corridor. Carried out by Groundwork Oldham & Rochdale, the aim of the work was to provide an assessment of the site at present and of its potential to be a high quality green space asset in the future. 2.3 Following lengthy consultation with local residents, the two local authorities and other key stakeholders, the final version of the Feasibility Study and Aspirational Masterplan have now been produced. These are expected to be formally signed off th by the Moston Brook Partnership Steering Group on 24 September 2008, and now formal approval of the documents is being sought from the two local authorities. 3. RECOMMENDATION(S) 3.1 To approve the Moston Brook Corridor Feasibility Study and endorse the following recommendations contained within it which suggest: • Conducting intrusive site investigation in order to examine the potential pollutant linkages identified, and determine what measures need to be taken 1 to reduce the risks as far as possible • The removal of Japanese Knotweed and other invasive species • Elimination of the pollution within Moston Brook, through the introduction of reed-bed systems and re-meandering of the brook • Prioritising routeways throughout the site to control public access, and the installation of a ‘green bridge’ across Broadway to provide the ‘missing link’ in the creation of a main routeway through the corridor • Additional surveying of bats, birds, water voles and woodland ground flora • Further consultation/ continued engagement of the residents and groups – particularly around key improvements in the master plan that would require detailed consultation prior to implementation; such as the natural waterplay area, mountain bike tracks, skateable features etc. • The need to formalise and develop the structure of the Moston Brook Partnership to ensure the successful future of the site 3.2 To approve the Aspirational Masterplan for the Moston Brook Corridor and endorse the proposals contained within it. 3.2 To confirm the Council’s commitment to the implementation of the Action Plan contained within the Moston Brook Corridor Feasibility Study. 2 MOSTON BROOK GREEN CORRIDOR – FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ASPIRATIONAL MASTERPLAN 4. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND 4.1 Moston Brook Green Corridor – Location, Form and Function The Moston Brook Green Corridor is a strategically important area of green space that stretches from the Rochdale Canal at Failsworth, to Dean Lane in East Manchester. Covering around 60 hectares (approximately 40 hectares of which fall within the borough of Oldham), the corridor straddles the boundary between Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council and Manchester City Council, and is situated within the wards of Failsworth West, Failsworth East and Chadderton South in Oldham, Moston and Newton Heath in Manchester. The Green Corridor is made up of four distinct sites – Wrigley Head, Hardman Fold, Broadway Common, and Moston Fairway. The area is designated as Other Protected Open Space (OPOL) within Oldham’s Unitary Development Plan (UDP) and River Valley within Manchester’s UDP, with additional protection in place for the biologically important Rochdale Canal (SSSI and SAC) and Moston Fairways site (SBI). Most of the Moston Brook Green Corridor is currently either used as a space for informal recreational, unused, or a venue for antisocial/environmental crime activities. 3 Surrounded by economic and housing regeneration initiatives, but with poor physical and operational connections, the Moston Brook Green Corridor site is currently failing to fulfil its potential, providing little, if any, support or added value to the wider regeneration activity at either the local or sub-regional level. Similarly, despite the major road and rail/ metrolink routes that dissect the site, the greenspace corridor has become invisible, not really registering on the mental map of local people, or those commuters that regularly travel through and alongside it. 4.2 Moston Brook Partnership Although the Moston Brook Corridor contains areas of natural beauty and historic interest, these qualities have been blighted by problems such as fly-tipping and off- road bike nuisance. In recognition of the problems affecting the Moston Brook Green Corridor, and with support from both Council Leaders, a series of meetings were held between Oldham and Manchester Councils during 2006, and a wider Moston Brook Partnership established in 2007. Within the Partnership, a Steering Group, Officers Group and Contaminated Land Sub-group have been set up to drive forward this huge task. The membership of these groups include councillors, officers and residents, from both Manchester and Oldham, and representatives from other relevant agencies such as Groundwork Oldham and Rochdale, Groundwork Manchester, Salford and Trafford and the Environment Agency. 4.3 Feasibility Study and Aspirational Masterplan Following the establishment of the Moston Brook Partnership, the two local authorities (Oldham and Manchester) pooled funding streams to provide £40,000 to conduct a thorough survey of the Moston Brook corridor and establish priorities for action and further funding bids. In June 2007, this funding was used to commission the production of a Feasibility Study and Aspirational Masterplan for the Moston Brook Green Corridor. Carried out by Groundwork Oldham and Rochdale, the aim of the work was to provide an assessment of the site at present and of its potential to be a high quality green space asset in the future. To ensure the study and masterplan were informed by site’s complex ecological and contaminated land issues a Phase 1 Ecological Survey (produced by Greater Manchester Ecological Unit), and a Preliminary Risk Assessment (carried out by Parsons Brinckerhoff), were commissioned by Groundwork Oldham & Rochdale. In addition, the study was also informed by the 2002 Pollution Prevention report produced by Atkins on behalf of the Environment Agency. 4 5. CURRENT POSITION 5.1 Following lengthy consultation with local residents, the two local authorities and other key stakeholders, the final version of the Moston Brook Corridor Feasibility Study and Aspirational Masterplan have now been produced. The Study and Masterplan are due to be formally signed off by the Moston Brook Partnership th Steering Group on Wednesday 24 September 2008. 5.2 Feasibility Study Recommendations The feasibility study identifies the opportunities and constraints within the Moston Brook Corridor, and makes recommendations on how the area could be brought forward in accordance with the overall strategic vision. These recommendations include: • Conducting intrusive site investigation in order to examine the potential pollutant linkages identified, and determine what measures need to be taken to reduce the risks as far as possible • Removal of Japanese Knotweed (and other invasive species) • Elimination of the pollution within Moston Brook, through introduction of reed- bed systems and re-meandering of the brook • Prioritising routeways throughout the site to control public access, and the installation of a ‘green bridge’ across Broadway to provide the ‘missing link’ in the creation of a main routeway through the corridor • Additional surveying of bats, birds, water voles and woodland ground flora • Further Consultation/ continued engagement of the residents and groups – Particularly around key improvements in the master plan that would require detailed consultation prior to implementation; such as the natural waterplay area, mountain bike tracks, skateable features etc. • The need to formalise and develop the structure of the Moston Brook Partnership to ensure the successful future of the site 5.3 Action Plan The Study is also supported by a 10 year action plan which sets out how the vision will be delivered, and identifies key actions to be undertaken by all of the Partnership members. For example: 5 Partnership Example of Key Action Areas Member Environment Monitor the water quality of the Moston Brook watercourse Agency Carry out a programme of water quality research and interventions. Investigate and take action to prevent pollution (from combined sewer overflows, landfill leachate, industrial sites etc.) Forestry Develop a long-term woodland management plan for the site Commission, and secure funding for woodland management Pennine Edge Forest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MACF 2014 Report.Pdf
    1 Key facts In 2012 Manchester’s population was 511,000 Manchester has 32 electoral wards There are 181 schools in Manchester (170 local authority) There are 16,900 businesses in Manchester Manchester covers an area of 11,564 hectares In 2012 there were 220,150 households in Manchester Manchester’s energy consumption in 2011 was 9,130 GWh 73% of journeys to the city are by public transport or bike Manchester recycled 36% of its household waste in 2012/13 58% of the city’s surface area is green infrastructure 2 Contents MACF Steering Group Chair’s introduction 4-5 Part 1 MACF Steering Group activity in 2013: a year of change 6-7 Part 2 The city’s action on climate change in 2013: progress against MACF plan 8-9 Meeting our objectives 10-18 1 Reducing the city’s CO2 emissions by 41% by 2020 10-12 (from 2005 levels) 2 Culture change - embedding ‘low carbon thinking’ 13-15 in the lifestyles and operations of the city 3 Prepare for and actively adapt to a rapidly changing climate 16 4 Making a rapid transition to a low carbon economy 17-18 Buildings 20-28 Energy 29-33 Transport 34-39 Sustainable consumption and production 40-44 Green and blue infrastructure 45-49 Part 3 Actions for 2014 50-51 3 MACF Steering Group Chair’s introduction Over the past two decades the scientific community has gathered a growing body of irrefutable evidence that climate change is occurring on a global scale, brought about by the increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere as a result of human behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Upm Methodology
    USING THE UPM METHODOLOGY Graham Squibbs - North West Water Mark Bottomley and Richard Norreys - Montgomery Watson Introduction The Urban Pollution Management (UPM) studies undertaken by Montgomery Watson with North West Water (NWW)' formed the part of .North West Water's UPM programme within the Mersey Basin. These considered the impact of wastewater treatment work and CSO discharges from the sewer network on the receiving watercourses. These studies covered four areas surrounding and including parts of the City of Manchester being Oldham, to the north east of Manchester, part of Bolton to the north west, Salford to the west and the River Medlock catchment including part of Manchester, Droylesden and Failsworth . The catchments have a population in excess of 600 000 people and contain over 76 UCSOs, four wastewater treatment works requiring upgrading works as part of the National Environmental Programme and in excess of 20 different water courses. Tables 1 to 4 detail the studies. The studies were carried out by Montgomery Watson in conjunction with NWW input to a combined team. The UPM data collection programme covering flow and quality surveys was maintained as a single programme under NWW control. The project involved considerable modelling work. In the course of the studies : 14 HYDROWORKS sewer network quality models were built along with two Mike 11 river impact models and three STOAT wastewater treatment work models. In addition existing drainage area study network hydraulic models were upgraded to HYDROWORKS and reverified. UPM Methodology Urban Pollution Management' (UPM) concerns the management of wastewater discharges from urban sewerage and sewage treatment facilities under wet weather conditions .
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling ➔ • Walking ➔ • Public Transport ➔ • Road Access ➔ • Customer Analysis ➔ • Evaluation ➔ • Delivery ➔ Introduction
    Station Travel Plan Dewsbury TransPennine Express. Station Travel Plan. Dewsbury. Version 3. Published 31/03/2020 Contents TransPennine Express Station Travel Plans are produced in line with guidance issued by Rail • Introduction ➔ Delivery Group (RDG) formerly the Association of Train Operators (ATOC). • Process ➔ All information contained within the Station Travel Plan is correct as of the date of publishing. Station Travel Plans will be updated and republished on the anniversary of the publishing date. • Stakeholders ➔ Use the Dark Blue arrows to navigate to each section of the document. • Local Area ➔ • Accessing the Station ➔ • Cycling ➔ • Walking ➔ • Public Transport ➔ • Road Access ➔ • Customer Analysis ➔ • Evaluation ➔ • Delivery ➔ Introduction What is a Station Travel Plan? The Department for Transport defines as Station Travel Plan as: ‘A strategy for managing the travel generated by your organisation, with the aim of reducing its environmental impact, typically involving support for walking, cycling, public transport and car sharing’ TransPennine Express maintains Station Travel Plans for all 19 stations where they are currently the Station Facility Owner (SFO). Why Develop a Station Travel Plan? Demand for rail continues to grow, with more and more people choosing to travel by rail each year. It is predicted that within the next 30 years demand for rail will more than double. TransPennine Express is at the heart of this growth, with double digit percentage growth in passenger journeys year on year, with a doubling of customer numbers since the franchise was established in 2004. With growth of this magnitude, it is important that alongside investing in new trains, operating more services and enhancing the customer experience, we are considerate of how customers travel to and from the station to access the railway network.
    [Show full text]
  • Dewsbury Station Plan
    Station Travel Plan - Dewsbury Introduction What is a Station Travel Plan? The Department for Transport defines a Station Travel Plan as: “A strategy for managing the travel generated by your organisation, with the aim of reducing its environmental impact, typically involving support for walking, cycling, public transport and car sharing”. TransPennine Express maintains Station Travel Plans for all 19 stations where they are currently the Station Facility Owner (SFO). Why Develop a Station Travel Plan? Up until March 2020 demand for rail continued to grow, with more and more people choosing to travel by rail each year. It is predicted that, post the COVID-19 pandemic, within the next 30 years demand for rail will more than double. TransPennine Express is at the heart of this growth, with double digit percentage growth in passenger journeys year on year, with a doubling of customer numbers since the franchise was established in 2004. With growth of this magnitude, it is important that alongside investing in new trains, operating more services and enhancing the customer experience, we are considerate of how customers travel to and from the station to access the railway network. Against the landscape of a changing culture towards private transport, with many millennials choosing not to own a car, and instead adopt solutions such as Uber, dockless bike hire and car sharing schemes, a Station Travel Plan allows operators to identify the developments which are required to keep pace with society. It also allows us to identify key areas of change, with the evident shift from internal combustion to electric cars and hybrids, we are able to set out plans for providing the infrastructure to support this shift.
    [Show full text]
  • River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater
    River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater Manchester Combined Authority Water body output maps LIFE Integrated Project LIFE14IPE/UK/027 The Irwell Management Catchment Water body ID Water body Name GB112069064660 Irwell (Source to Whitewell Brook) GB112069064670 Whitewell Brook GB112069064641 Irwell (Cowpe Bk to Rossendale STW) GB112069064680 Limy Water GB112069064650 Ogden GB112069064620 Irwell (Rossendale STW to Roch) GB112069064610 Kirklees Brook GB112069060840 Irwell (Roch to Croal) GB112069061451 Irwell (Croal to Irk) GB112069064720 Roch (Source to Spodden) GB112069064690 Beal GB112069064730 Spodden GB112069064600 Roch (Spodden to Irwell) GB112069064710 Naden Brook GB112069061250 Whittle Brook (Irwell) GB112069064570 Eagley Brook GB112069064560 Astley Brook (Irwell) GB112069064530 Tonge GB112069064540 Middle Brook GB112069064550 Croal (including Blackshaw Brook) GB112069061161 Irk (Source to Wince Brook) GB112069061120 Wince Brook GB112069061131 Irk (Wince to Irwell) GB112069061452 Irwell / Manchester Ship Canal (Irk to confluence with Upper Mersey) GB112069061151 Medlock (Source to Lumb Brook) GB112069061152 Medlock (Lumb Brook to Irwell) GB112069061430 Folly Brook and Salteye Brook. GB112069064580 Bradshaw Brook Click on a water body to navigate to that map Water body name Issues: Comments provided during the Opportunity theme symbols Workshop on the 10th February • Lists the issues in the water Fisheries – barrier removal body and their causes Physical modifications Opportunities: • Based on the issues what Water quality are the main opportunities for the Partnership. This excludes water company issues and the Mitigation Measures Actions as these are presented as other opportunities below. Map of the waterbody indicating the location of Irwell Catchment Partnership Projects, Mitigation Measures Actions, Environment Agency sampling locations, Mitigation Measure Actions: consented discharges, and priority barriers for eel. • A list of the Mitigation Measures Actions identified in the water body by the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Middleton Township Committee 10Th
    REPORT FOR DECISION Agenda item no: Middleton Township Committee 10 th November 2011 Sustrans Connect2 walking and cycling network proposals for Middleton Wards affected: Middleton Township Report Author: Howard Gott wards Telephone: (01706) 922019 To provide members with the opportunity to approve options for the route connecting Middleton Township to the reconstructed canal towpath at Boarshaw, using Connect2 funding. 1. It is recommended that: 1.1 Committee approve the route A- K as shown in the accompanying drawing to be taken forward for improvement and signing as the Connect2 Middleton Link. 1.2 Committee approve the destination of the Middleton Heritage area surrounding St Leonard’s church , with alternative routes signed. 1.3 Individual concerns from members regarding sections of identified routes are noted. 1.4 Chair, Vice and Service Director, Planning & Regulation be authorised to approve any modifications to the proposed route in order to ensure optimisation of funding. 2. Reasons for recommendation: 2.1 The proposed link will complete the Sustrans Connect2 network into Middleton and provide residents and visitors with sustainable travel choices for a variety of journeys from commuting to leisure and tourism. 2.2 The proposals contribute to aims in the Community Plan relating to increased provision of walking and cycling routes, local indicator Env 064 measuring the number of households within 800m of a National Cycle Network standard route, and Local Transport Plan aims to enable more short trips on foot or by cycle. 2.3 The proposals contribute significantly to Aiming High priorities in: Creating a cleaner, greener environment; Improving health and wellbeing.
    [Show full text]
  • Fore Consulting
    PROJECT: HUNGATE URBAN NEIGHBOURHOOD FULL PLANNING APPLICATION – BLOCK H CLIENT: HUNGATE (YORK) REGENERATION LTD. DATE: FEBRUARY 2021 TRAVEL PLAN Hungate (York) Regeneration Limited Hungate, York: Block H Planning Application Updated Travel Plan 2 February 2021 Version 1.1 Issue 2 Hungate (York) Regeneration Limited 3236 ▪ Hungate, York: Block H Planning Application ▪ Updated Travel Plan 2 February 2021 ▪ Version 1.1 ▪ Issue Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Commission 1 1.2 The Hungate Urban Neighbourhood 1 1.3 Purpose of this Report 2 1.4 Structure of the Report 3 2 Site Accessibility 4 2.1 Site Location 4 2.2 Pedestrian Access 4 2.3 Cycle Access 5 2.4 Public Transport 7 2.5 Car Club 9 2.6 Electric Vehicle Charging Points 9 2.7 Local Highway Network 9 2.8 Summary 10 3 Development Proposals for Block H 11 3.1 Proposed Land Use 11 3.2 Walking and Cycling 11 3.4 Vehicular Access and Parking 12 4 Travel Plan Management 14 4.1 Lifespan of the Travel Plan 14 4.2 Travel Plan Objectives 14 4.3 Responsibility for Delivering the Travel Plan 15 4.4 Funding 15 4.5 Liaison with City of York Council (CoYC) 15 4.6 Targets 15 4.7 Monitoring Framework for the Development 16 5 Summary of Actions and Measures 18 ii Hungate (York) Regeneration Limited 3236 ▪ Hungate, York: Block H Planning Application ▪ Updated Travel Plan 2 February 2021 ▪ Version 1.1 ▪ Issue Figures Figure 1: Site Location Figure 2: Walking Catchment and Local Land Use Figure 3: Cycle Catchment and Long-distance Cycle Routes Figure 4: Public Transport Network Appendices Appendix A: Development Masterplan Appendix B: Homeowner user manual (travel information) iii Hungate (York) Regeneration Limited 3236 ▪ Hungate, York: Block H Planning Application ▪ Updated Travel Plan 2 February 2021 ▪ Version 1.1 ▪ Issue 1 Introduction 1.1 Commission Fore Consulting Ltd (Fore) has been commissioned by Hungate (York) Regeneration Limited to prepare an Updated Travel Plan be submitted with a planning application for the development of Block H of the wider Hungate site in York.
    [Show full text]
  • Oldham Plan Local
    Oldham Local Plan 'Options Report' Habitats Regulations Assessment Site Allocations Development Plan Document December 2013 Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) of the Impact of Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council’s Options Report of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document Prepared by The Greater Manchester Ecology Unit Council Offices Wellington Road Ashton-under-Lyne OL6 6DL Contact: Teresa Hughes For Oldham MBC January 2013 4 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Methodology 3 Brief description of the Plan 4 Identification of European designated sites concerned 5 The Nature Conservation Interest of the South Pennine Moors SAC/SPA and the Rochdale Canal SAC. 6 Screening Opinion 7 Potentially available mitigation 8 Consideration of ‘in combination effects’ 9 Summary and Recommendations References Figure 1: Map Showing Location of European Sites within Oldham APPENDIX 1: European designated sites within the North West Region and possible effects from development within Oldham APPENDIX 2: Screening Summary of European designated sites within the North West Region and possible impacts from development within Oldham APPENDIX 3: List of Other Plans and Projects Considered within the Assessment Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) of the Impact of Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council’s Options Report of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document 1 Introduction 1.1 Article 6(3) of the European Habitats Directive (Council Directive 1992/43/EEC) dealing with the conservation of European protected sites states that: ‘Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans and projects, shall be subject to assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan North West River Basin District
    River Basin Management Plan North West River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 3 C.2 Actions we can all take 9 C.3 All sectors 11 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 14 C.5 Angling and conservation 32 C.6 Central government 45 C.7 Environment Agency 52 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 67 C.9 Local and regional government 78 C.10 Mining and quarrying 87 C.11 Navigation 92 C.12 Urban and transport 96 C.13 Water industry 102 Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District 2 Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives December 2009 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B: Objectives for waters in the North West River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these. • Annex D: Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E: Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Travel Plan Huddersfield
    Station Travel Plan Huddersfield TransPennine Express. Station Travel Plan. Huddersfield. Version 2. Published 31/03/2019 Contents TransPennine Express Station Travel Plans are produced in line with guidance issued by Rail • Introduction ➔ Delivery Group (RDG) formerly the Association of Train Operators (ATOC). • Process ➔ All information contained within the Station Travel Plan is correct as of the date of publishing. Station Travel Plans will be updated and republished on the anniversary of the publishing date. • Stakeholders ➔ Use the Dark Blue arrows to navigate to each section of the document. • Local Area ➔ • Accessing the Station ➔ • Cycling ➔ • Walking ➔ • Public Transport ➔ • Road Access ➔ • Customer Analysis ➔ • Evaluation ➔ • Delivery ➔ Station Travel Plan. Huddersfield. Version 2. Published 31/03/2019 Introduction What is a Station Travel Plan? The Department for Transport defines as Station Travel Plan as: ‘A strategy for managing the travel generated by your organisation, with the aim of reducing its environmental impact, typically involving support for walking, cycling, public transport and car sharing’ TransPennine Express maintains Station Travel Plans for all 19 stations where they are currently the Station Facility Owner (SFO). Why Develop a Station Travel Plan? Demand for rail continues to grow, with more and more people choosing to travel by rail each year. It is predicted that within the next 30 years demand for rail will more than double. TransPennine Express is at the heart of this growth, with double digit percentage growth in passenger journeys year on year, with a doubling of customer numbers since the franchise was established in 2004. With growth of this magnitude, it is important that alongside investing in new trains, operating more services and enhancing the customer experience, we are considerate of how customers travel to and from the station to access the railway network.
    [Show full text]
  • Chanpes to Site MX2-39 Parlinston
    Site Allocations Plan Consultation Leeds City Council The leonardo Building 2 Rossington Street Leeds ts2 8HD Chanpes to site MX2-39 Parlinston Dear Sir, I strongly object to the proposal of building thousands of new homes in Parlington. I am a member of a walking group and until recently I was unaware of the proposed development. Our walking group visits the area of Parlington and the surrounding villages. I understand that Parlington has been included into Leeds Site Allocation Plan after another proposed development at Headley Hall of 5,000 homes was withdrawn. I am opposed to Parlington being taken out of the green belt. The changes made and the reduction in number to 1850 houses being built on this historic estate will bring a significant and detrimental impact on the rural character of the area. This number is almost the same as the villages of Aberford and Barwick-in-Elmet combined. This is a significant change from the original proposal of a self-sustaining community. The changes to the number of houses would make the new settlement unsustainable as it would not provide the required infrastructure. Parlington is a planned historic landscape that has remained unchanged for hundreds of years. lt has many areas of historic significance includíng the Grade Ll Triumphal Arch and Aberford Fly Line railway. It has ancient woodland ,a former Deer Park, high grade agricultural land, sites of ecological and geological interest, is in the Southern Magnesium Limestone landscape and is even identified in Leeds City Councils own Core Strategy as a site of strategic green infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in Manchester’S Rivers
    MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOR INFORMATION COMMITTEE: Physical Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee DATE: 6th March 2007 SUBJECT: Water quality in Manchester’s rivers. REPORT OF: Strategic Director, Neighbourhood Services PURPOSE OF REPORT To investigate how the water quality in local waterways is maintained and consider how the City Council can contribute to improving the quality of water. RECOMMENDATIONS That Members note the report. FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR THE REVENUE BUDGET None at present FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR THE CAPITAL BUDGET None at present CONTACT OFFICERS Sarah Davies, Green City Programme Director – 0161 234 3361 [email protected] Jonathan Sadler, Green City Project Officer – 0161 234 1871 [email protected] BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS Reports to the Physical Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee: a) Waterways Strategy for Manchester October 2003 b) Progress Report on the Waterways Strategy 8th March 2005 WARDS AFFECTED All IMPLICATIONS FOR KEY COUNCIL POLICIES Anti Poverty Equal Opportunities Environment Employment No No Yes Yes Page 1 of 11 1 Introduction 1.1 There have been significant improvements in river and canal water quality over the past 20 years. The majority of rivers in the city are generally of average to good quality, however there is room for improvement. 1.2 In recent years the potential of rivers to cause significant risk to life and damage to property through flooding has also come into sharp relief highlighting the need to manage river corridors and river networks in a more holistic way. 1.3 The EU Freshwater Fisheries Directive (FFD) was introduced in 1978 to improve the quality of rivers, and to set water quality standards to ensure that from source to sea, rivers are capable of supporting fish.
    [Show full text]