Public Transportation Association University of South Florida Fax: 813•974•5168 Email: Chester E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Transportation Association University of South Florida Fax: 813•974•5168 Email: Chester E Gary L. Brosch, Editor Pam Clark, Assistant to the Editor SUBSCRIPTIONS Complimentary subscriptions can be obtained by contacting: EDITORIAL BOARD Pam Clark, Assistant to the Editor Robert B. Cervero, Ph.D. William W. Millar Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) University of California, Berkeley American Public Transportation Association University of South Florida Fax: 813•974•5168 Email: Chester E. Colby Steven E. Polzin, Ph.D., P.E. [email protected] Web: www.nctr.usf.edu/jpt/journal.htm E & J Consulting University of South Florida Gordon Fielding, Ph.D. Sandra Rosenbloom, Ph.D. University of California, Irvine University of Arizona SUBMISSION OF MANUSCRIPTS David J. Forkenbrock, Ph.D. Lawrence Schulman The Journal of Public Transportation is a quarterly, international journal containing original University of Iowa LS Associates research and case studies associated with various forms of public transportation and re- lated transportation and policy issues. Topics are approached from a variety of academic Jose A. Gómez-Ibáñez, Ph.D. George Smerk, D.B.A. disciplines, including economics, engineering, planning, and others, and include policy, methodological, technological, and financial aspects. Emphasis is placed on the identifica- Harvard University Indiana University tion of innovative solutions to transportation problems. Naomi W. Ledé, Ph.D. Vukan R. Vuchic, Ph.D., P.E. All articles should be approximately 4,000 words in length (18-20 double-spaced pages). Texas Transportation Institute University of Pennsylvania Manuscripts not submitted according to the journal’s style will be returned. Submission of the manuscript implies commitment to publish in the journal. Papers previously published or under review by other journals are unacceptable. All articles are subject to peer review. Factors considered in review include validity and significance of information, substantive contribution to the field of public transportation, and clarity and quality of presentation. Copyright is retained by the publisher, and, upon acceptance, contributions will be sub- ject to editorial amendment. Authors will be provided with proofs for approval prior to publication. All manuscripts must be submitted electronically, double-spaced in Word file format, containing only text and tables. If not created in Word, each table must be submitted separately in Excel format and all charts and graphs must be in Excel format. All supporting illustrations and photographs must be submitted separately in an image file format, (i.e., TIF, JPG, AI or EPS), having a minimum 300 dpi, and include all sources and written permissions. Each chart and table must have a title and each figure must have a caption. All manuscripts should include sections in the following order, as specified: Cover Page - title (12 words or less) and complete contact information for all authors First Page of manuscript - title and abstract (up to 150 words) Main Body - organized under section headings References - Chicago Manual of Style, author-date format The contents of this document reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the Biographical Sketch - of each author accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Research Institute Program, in the interest of Be sure to include the author’s complete contact information, including email address, information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. mailing address, telephone, and fax number. Submit manuscripts to the Assistant to the Editor, as indicated above. Public JOURNAL OF Transportation Volume 10, No. 1, 2007 ISSN 1077-291X TheJournal of Public Transportation is published quarterly by National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida • College of Engineering 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, Florida 33620-5375 Phone: 813•974•3120 Fax: 813•974•5168 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nctr.usf.edu/jpt/journal.htm © 2007 Center for Urban Transportation Research Volume 10, No. 1, 2007 ISSN 1077-291X CONTENTS Reforming Innercity Bus Transportation in a Developing Country: A Passenger-Driven Model Syed Saad Andaleeb, Mahmudul Haq, Rubina I. Ahmed ........................................................1 Making Regional Railroads More Attractive— Research Studies in Germany and Patronage Characteristics Dietmar Bosserhoff...................................................................................................................................27 Design and Evaluation of Passenger Ferry Routes Avishai (Avi) Ceder, Majid Sarvi ..............................................................................................................59 Allocation and Use of Section 5310 Funds in Urban and Rural America Tom Seekins, Alexandra Enders, Alison Pepper, Stephen Sticka ........................................81 An Evaluation of Los Angeles’s Orange Line Busway Richard Stanger ......................................................................................................................................103 Our troubled planet can no longer afford the luxury of pursuits confined to an ivory tower. Scholarship has to prove its worth, not on its own terms, but by service to the nation and the world. —Oscar Handlin iii Reforming Innercity Bus Transportation in a Developing Country Reforming Innercity Bus Transportation in a Developing Country: A Passenger-Driven Model Syed Saad Andaleeb, The Pennsylvania State University at Erie Mahmudul Haq, BRAC University, Bangladesh Rubina I. Ahmed, East West University, Bangladesh Abstract The transportation system in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, requires significant improve- ments. The shortage of motorized vehicles and the excessive number of nonmotorized vehicles on the city’s streets have been the cause of unbearable traffic congestion, leading to negative externalities such as productivity loss, increase in stress levels, and adverse health effects from pollution. In a city inhabited by more than 12 million peo- ple, predominantly representing the middle- and lower-middle class, a well-organized low-cost bus transportation system is yet to emerge to resolve the city’s transporta- tion problems. This study explores ways of improving bus transportation services in Dhaka. Eight factors were identified to address satisfaction levels of regular bus users whose opinions and concerns are deemed vital in making bus services in the city bet- ter organized, need based, and service oriented. Using factor analysis and multiple regression, five of the eight selected factors were found to have significant effects on passenger satisfaction. These include comfort levels, staff behavior, number of buses changed to reach destination, supervision, and waiting facilities. Policy implications are discussed in view of the findings. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2007 Introduction The transportation needs of major cities will present significant challenges for pol- icy makers as the unpredictable shifts in population dynamics in response to need for employment, housing, and sustenance continues. For example, bustling cities in India, China, Mexico, and Thailand today are struggling to keep pace with the demand for more and better transportation as the number of people in these cit- ies begins to swell with economic growth and development. With a rise in demand for transportation comes congestion and other problems. Delays, uncertainty, and stress levels are also beginning to take their toll on both individuals and society (Morris et al. 005). Improving public transportation is seen by many as critical (Ison and Wall 00). The UK has already begun to look 0 years ahead to shape its transportation policy (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions 000). In South Korea also, the Seoul Metropolitan Government has “completely reorganized bus services, installed (rapid transit) corridors, improved coordination of metro and bus services, and fully integrated the fare structure and ticketing systems between routes, as well as modes” (Pucher et al. 005). The transportation system in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, catering to more than million people, faces numerous and significant challenges. The complex and het- erogeneous traffic pool, largely dominated by nonmotorized vehicles (especially rickshaws), poorly maintained motorized vehicles, and the lack of enforcement of traffic rules, creates serious and often unbearable congestion and heavy pollution in the city’s streets. These factors also contribute enormously to the travel-related suffering of city dwellers, a situation that by many accounts is deteriorating rap- idly. Unfortunately, research on Dhaka City’s transportation problems is seriously lack- ing. According to Mannan and Karim (00), the number of vehicles per 00,000 people in the city is only ,630; of these, ,95 are nonmotorized. More signifi- cantly, rickshaws (a traditional, human-powered vehicle) and other nonmotor- ized vehicles account for 50 percent of the traffic flows. About 60 percent of the people travel on foot while almost half of the remaining people use nonmotorized vehicles. Moreover, roughly 40 percent of passenger trips and 5 percent of the freight movements are by rickshaws, estimated to be about 50,000 in number (Mannan and Karim 00) and registered with Dhaka City Corporation. If we consider the number of unregistered rickshaws,
Recommended publications
  • TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Formats
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms Management Unit TR0003 (REV 10/98) at (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER CA-17-2969 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE A Comparative Analysis of High Speed Rail Station Development into Destination and/or Multi-use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon February 2017 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris Ph.D. / Deike Peters, Ph.D. MTI Report 12-75 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER Mineta Transportation Institute College of Business 3762 San José State University 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER San José, CA 95192-0219 65A0499 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED California Department of Transportation Final Report Division of Research, Innovation and Systems Information MS-42, PO Box 942873 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 16. ABSTRACT As a burgeoning literature on high-speed rail development indicates, good station-area planning is a very important prerequisite for the eventual successful operation of a high-speed rail station; it can also trigger opportunities for economic development in the station area and the station-city. At the same time, “on the ground” experiences from international examples of high-speed rail stations can provide valuable lessons for the California high-speed rail system in general, and the San Jose Diridon station in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of High-Speed Rail Station Development Into Destination and Multi-Use Facilities: the Case of San Jose Diridon
    MTI A Comparative Analysis of Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 High-Speed Rail Station Transportation and California Department of Transportation Development into Destination and Multi-Use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon MTI ReportMTI 12-02 December 2012 MTI Report 12-75 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF MNTRC Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation MTI/MNTRC BOARD OF TRUSTEES Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) Richard A. White (Ex-Officio) Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Interim President and CEO be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. American Public Transportation Transportation Association (APTA) Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Vice Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2009 Texts of the Online Report for Downloading
    Sustainability Report 2009 Texts of the online report for downloading 1 Note: These are the texts of the Sustainability Report 2009, which are being made available in this file for archival purposes. The Sustainability Report was designed for an Internet presentation. Thus, for example, related links are shown only on the Internet in order to ensure that the report can be kept up-to-date over the next two years until the next report is due. Where appropriate, graphics are offered on the Internet in better quality than in this document in order to reduce the size of the file downloaded. 2 Table of Contents 1 Our company 6 1.1 Preface .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Corporate Culture................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Confidence..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Values ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.3 Dialog ........................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.3.1 Stakeholder dialogs 10 1.2.3.2 Memberships 12 1.2.3.3 Environmental dialog 14 1.3 Strategy ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2000 Higher Transport Performance We Were Able to Increase Our Transport Performance in Passenger and Freight Transport Significantly in 2000
    Annual Report 2000 Higher Transport Performance We were able to increase our transport performance in passenger and freight transport significantly in 2000. Positive Income Development Our operating income after interest improved by € 286 million. Modernization of Deutsche Bahn AG A comprehensive fitness program and the expansion of our capital expenditures will pave the way to our becoming an even more effective railway. Key figures Change in € million 2000 1999 in % Revenues 15,465 15,630 – 1.1 Revenues (comparable) 15,465 14,725 + 5.0 Income before taxes 37 91 – 59.3 Income after taxes 85 87 – 2.3 EBITDA 2,502 2,036 + 22.9 EBIT 450 71 + 533.8 Operating income after net interest 199 – 87 + 328.7 Return on capital employed in % 1.6 0.3 – Fixed assets 34,671 33,495 + 3.5 Total assets 39,467 37,198 + 6.1 Equity 8,788 8,701 + 1.0 Cash flow (before taxes) 2,113 2,107 + 0.3 Gross capital expenditures 6,892 8,372 – 17.7 Net capital expenditures 1) 3,250 3,229 + 0.7 Employees (as of Dec 31) 222,656 241,638 – 7.9 Performance figures Change Passenger Transport 2000 1999 in % Passengers DB Reise&Touristik million 144.8 146.5 – 1.2 DB Regio million 1,567.7 1,533.6 + 2.2 Total million 1,712.5 1,680.1 + 1.9 Passenger kilometers DB Reise&Touristik million pkm 2) 36,226 34,897 + 3.8 DB Regio million pkm 2) 38,162 37,949 + 0.6 Total million pkm 2) 74,388 72,846 + 2.1 Train kilometers DB Reise&Touristik million train-path km 175.9 177.5 – 0.9 DB Regio million train-path km 563.9 552.4 + 2.1 Total million train-path km 739.8 729.9 + 1.4 Freight Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Sweden to Europe Making International Rail Travel a Reality
    Connecting Sweden to Europe Making international rail travel a reality 1:28 Contents About Summary Summary ....................................................... 1 Customer: Jakop Dalunde 2021 will be the European Year of Rail. It is high time Forword ........................................................ 2 to lay the foundation of how to increase international Authors: Stephan Bösch Background and Scope ................................. 3 rail travel in Europe. The purpose of this report is to present facts that point to the shortcomings that exist PG Andersson Existing Market ............................................. 5 within the EU when it comes to cross-border rail Missing Links .............................................. 10 services as well as to identify the low hanging fruits that Mats Améen A Closer Look at the Öresund Links ............. 16 may exist concerning ”missing links” across borders Christer Ljungberg within the EU. The report focuses on the northern part Policies today .............................................. 19 of Europe which is defined as Scandinavia and Version: 1.0 Market Access............................................. 22 Germany, and to some extent the neighbouring Six Policy Suggestions ................................. 25 countries of Germany. Report nr: 2020:169 The report concludes with six policy suggestions, Date: 2021-01-23 concerning track fees, availability of tickets, passenger rights, and missing links. Consultants: Trivector Traffic The overall picture is that many administrative
    [Show full text]
  • DB Netz AG Network Statement 2020 Valid from 15.12.2019
    DB Netz AG Network Statement 2020 valid from 15.12.2019 DB Netz AG Headquarters I.NMN Version control Date Modification 09.12.2018 Amendment of Network Statement 2019 as at 09. December 2018 (Publication of the Network Statement 2020) 06.12.2018 Addition of detailed information concerning funding of rail freight transport by way of pro-rated financing of the approves track access charges 13.02.2019 Amendment of Network Statement 2020 due to decision of the Fed- eral Network Agency (BNetzA) to the application of DB Netz AG for approval of the charging principles and charges for the provision of the minimum access package with effect from 15. December 2019 (TPS 2020) 21.06.2019 Amendment Section 6.3.3.1 of the Network Statement 08.08.2019 Amendment Section 6.5 of the Network Statement “Incentive system to enhance performance capability” 23.10.2019 Addition of detailed information concerning the implementation of terms of use Click&Ride Printed by DB Netz AG Editors Principles of Network Access/Regulation (I.NMN) Theodor-Heuss-Allee 7 60486 Frankfurt am Main Picture credits Front page photo: Urheber: Volker Emersleben Copyright: Deutsche Bahn AG Network Statement 2020, editorial status 23.10.2019 2 Notes 1. Pending court proceedings regarding prohibitions of individual clauses The following clauses may still be modified due to court proceedings: Section 2.9.8.3 The Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) rejected the intended modification in section 2.9.8.3 sentence 2 lit. c) of the Network Statement 2018 with its decision of 18 November 2016 – BK 10-16-0009_Z, namely the modification to use the word “material” in relation to contractual duties.
    [Show full text]
  • DB Systemtechnik Activity Report 2019/2020
    DB Systemtechnik Activity Report 2019/2020 DB Systemtechnik Gruppe Contents 01 Foreword by Hans Peter Lang 02 DB Systemtechnik: The highlights 2019/2020 09 Editorial: The future of technology at DB 15 DB Systemtechnik reference projects 2019/2020 47 DB ESG reference projects 2019/2020 49 Trade fairs and activities 52 Keeping up the good work despite Covid 54 DB Systemtechnik: Your contacts Photo Cover: Martin Loibl Photos: DB AG / Volker Emersleben, Dr. Kai-Uwe Nielsen Activity Report 2019/2020 A Strong Rail needs a strong DB Systemtechnik For the first time in decades, substantial funds are being invested in renewing and expanding the rail infrastructure. Deutsche Bahn has launched its Strong Rail strategy based on the expectations of the rail sector in conjunction with this investment. We, DB Systemtechnik, will play a key role by supporting this stra- tegy with our own action programme. One crucial component of this programme is to increase the quality and availability of our means of production. In the future, we will equip these means with intelligence for better management. Often, for projects like these to be implemented effectively, we must have the necessary tech- nical knowledge and digital expertise down to the smallest detail. We must succeed in combining new approaches such as digital twinning, robot- ics and sensor technology with the knowledge of our 900 experts to de- velop solutions for technology, maintenance and operations. Despite the new, unpredictable challenges we faced this year, we reached fundamental milestones as we work toward our goals, such as the establishment of our new digital products and services business line.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement of Spain's Regional Railway System Based Off of Germany's Railway Model
    Improvement of Spain’s regional railway system based off of Germany’s railway model: Making R3 an efficient train line. Gil Salvans Torras Bachelor thesis Thesis advisor: María del Carmen Moreno Course 2018-2019 Abstract This research aims to compare the Spanish and German regional railway mobility systems, by analyzing infrastructures which compose each network, services operating them and legal framework that comprises them. To make it the most accurate and realistic, two study cases are analyzed in depth: R3 of Rodalies Renfe and RB22 of DB Regio Mitte. All of this composes the input to create an Improvement Project which will put forward and eliminate the innefficiecies of the Rodalies Renfe services based on the DB Regio experience. Key words: railway, regional, Deutsche Bahn, Renfe, system, transportation, Rodalies, R3, RB22. Resumen Esta investigación presenta una analogía entre los sistemas ferroviarios regionales de España y Alemania, donde se analizan las dos redes ferroviarias y sus infraestructuras correspondientes, los servicios que las operan y sus respectivos marcos legales presentes. Para darle más precisión y aplicabilidad práctica, se analizan profundamente dos casos de estudio: la línea R3 de Rodalies Renfe y la RB22 de DB Regio Mitte. Todo esto conforma la base para crear un proyecto de mejora que expondrá y eliminará las ineficiencias de los servicios de Rodalies basado en la experiencia alemana de DB Regio. Palabras clave: ferrocarril, regional, Deutsche Bahn, Renfe, sistema, transporte, Rodalies, R3, RB22. 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Presentation of the topic and motivations ........................................................ 3 1.2. Objectives and hypothesis ................................................................................. 4 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Planning and Transport Infrastructure Provision in the Randstad, Netherlands –
    Urban planning and transport infrastructure provision in the Randstad, Netherlands – A Global City Cluster Prepared for the Roundtable on Integrated Transport Development Experiences Of Global City Clusters (2-3 July 2015, Beijing China) Dominic STEAD and Evert MEIJERS Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands June 2015 THE INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM The International Transport Forum at the OECD is an intergovernmental organisation with 57 member countries. It acts as a strategic think-tank, with the objective of helping shape the transport policy agenda on a global level and ensuring that it contributes to economic growth, environmental protection, social inclusion and the preservation of human life and well-being. The International Transport Forum organises an Annual Summit of ministers along with leading representatives from industry, civil society and academia. The International Transport Forum was created under a Declaration issued by the Council of Ministers of the ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport) at its Ministerial Session in May 2006 under the legal authority of the Protocol of the ECMT, signed in Brussels on 17 October 1953, and legal instruments of the OECD. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Hop on the Train: a Rail Renaissance for Europe
    Hop on the train: A Rail Renaissance for Europe How the 2021 European Year of Rail can support the European Green Deal and a sustainable recovery AUTHORS Lena Donat, Manfred Treber (Germanwatch) Lukasz Janeczko (Civil Affairs Institute) Jakub Majewski (ProRail) Thomas Lespierre (France Nature Environnement) Jeremie Fosse (eco-union) Monica Vidal (Ecodes) Lucy Gilliam (Transport&Environment) LAYOUT & TYPESETTING Magda Warszawa Cover image: © Panimoni, dreamstime.com PUBLISHER Germanwatche.V. Office Bonn: Office Berlin: Kaiserstr. 201 Stresemannstr. 72 D-53113 Bonn D-10963 Berlin Phone +49 (0)228 / 60 492-0, Fax -19 Phone +49 (0)30 / 28 88 356-0, Fax -1 Internet: www.germanwatch.org E-mail: [email protected] Online available: https://germanwatch.org/en/19680 December 2020 ABOUT EUROPE ON RAIL Europe on Rail is a network of non-profit organisations from Poland, Germany, France, Spain and Brussels. The network seeks to build support for a rail renaissance in Europe and for respective policy measures to boost cross-border passenger rail transport. Table of Contents The European Year of Rail 2021 is a key driver for the European Green Deal 4 1. A European network: launch direct international services on European arteries 6 2. Easy booking: Make rail data sharing mandatory 10 3. Smart spending: Use EU money to improve rail infrastructure capacity and connectivity 14 Other policy interventions for supporting European rail 16 Why is this important? 18 4. Annex: Specific recommendations for Poland, Germany, France and Spain 20 What can Poland do to boost European rail services? 20 What can Germany do to boost European rail services? 22 What can France do to boost European rail services? 24 What can Spain do to boost European rail services? 26 References 28 4 The European Year of Rail 2021 is a key driver for the European Green Deal The European union has set itself the target to become climate neutral by 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Bahn Universe Deutsche Bahn Group 2018 Integrated Report
    Deutsche Bahn Universe Deutsche Bahn Group 2018 Integrated Report 2 1 4 1 1 THE TREND TOWARDS RAIL TRANSPORT CONTINUES UNABATED 1 DB GROUP OFFERS ATTRACTIVE, CUSTOMER-FOCUSED AND ENVIRON- 1 MENTALLY FRIENDLY MOBILITY, TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS SOLU - 4 TIONS, AND NETWORKS FROM A SINGLE SOURCE. 3 5 DB Group market position in Europe and around the world 2 DEUTSCHE BAHN UNIVERSE NEW IN 2018 DB Cargo: China DB Schenker: Lesotho, Mauritania WORLDWIDE PRESENCE DB Engineering&Consulting: Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay DEUTSCHE BAHN FACTS AND FIGURES DB Group is an international provider of mobility and logistics services operating globally in more than 130 countries. We have more than 318,000 employees, with almost 40% employed outside of Germany. By integrating transport and rail infra- structure, as well as through the economically and environmentally intelligent linking of all modes of transport, we move both people and goods. We occupy leading market positions in all relevant mobility and logistics markets. 3 Deutsche Bahn Group 2018 Integrated Report FACTS AND FIGURES PASSENGER TRANSPORT The core of DB Long-Distance’s operations in Germany is long-distance passenger IN 2018 OUR ICE FLEET rail transport operated on a purely commer- WAS EXPANDED TO cial basis with the ICE, IC and EC fleets. 274 >4.6 BILLION PASSENGERS ACROSS EUROPE 28,800 BUSES IN OPERATIONS 4 DEUTSCHE BAHN UNIVERSE DB Regional provides regional rail passenger transport and bus services with an extensive network of regional express, regional train, S-Bahn (metro) and regional bus lines, thus offering passengers connections in metropolitan areas and in rural areas across Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Through-Ticketing Study
    Northeast Corridor Through-Ticketing Study November 2018 Prepared by the Northeast Corridor Commission with support from: Foursquare ITP High Street Consulting Mathew Coogan RSG WSP Northeast Corridor Commission 1 CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Models for Through-Ticketing .................................................................................................................................... 2 Market Demand for Through-Ticketing .................................................................................................................... 2 Technical Challenges Associated with Through-Ticketing ..................................................................................... 3 Results and Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 What is Through-Ticketing? ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Study Background............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Study Methodology and Organization .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]