DOCSLIB.ORG

CCR Annual Report 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CCR Annual Report 2011 20Annual Report 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Bush defending domestic surveillance 4 In 2010, Obama authorized the targeted 7 CCR is challenging the expansion of the 10 During this past decade the Right has without warrants during a visit to the killing of a U.S. citizen in Yemen, by the U.S. prison industry with litigation on seized upon the trauma and fear to ultra-secret National Security Agency CIA and secret military forces. CCR and the behalf of immigrants caught up in the post undermine the rights heretofore at Fort Meade in January 2006. ACLU brought a challenge to that practice 9/11 round-ups (Turkmen v. Ashcroft) and unquestioned and enshrined in the in Al-Aulaqi v. Obama, arguing that lethal prisoners targeted for isolation based on Constitution. 2 Supreme Court upheld the “material force is only permissible after due process race, religion or political activities (Aref v. support” laws in a 2010 decision or in the face of an imminent threat. Case Holder). 11 Coffins of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq aboard criminalizing the provision of any assistance dismissed December 2010 on procedural a cargo plane in February 2003. The Bush to groups on the government’s “blacklist” grounds without addressing its merits. 8 CCR filed CCR v. Bush to challenge the administration delayed the release of this even when support is solely to promote NSA’s warrantless spying on people within and other photos depicting the human cost lawful and non-violent activities. CCR 5 A protestor opposing AZ’s controversial SB the U.S. just weeks after the program was of war for over a year. The U.S.-led wars in brought Holder v. Humanitarian Law 1070 is arrested outside Sheriff Arpaio’s revealed in December 2005. The case Iraq and Afghanistan have killed over 6,000 Project to challenge this on behalf of a office in July 2010. CCR is active in the continues as CCR v. Obama, seeking to U.S. soldiers and over 150,000 civilians to group that wanted to provide training in growing immigrants’ rights movement to have any records obtained through the date. human rights advocacy and peacemaking challenge racist legislation like SB 1070 illegal program destroyed. to a blacklisted group in Turkey. and the national “Secure Communities” 12 Obama’s photo replaces one of George immigration enforcement expansion, 9 Shocking images of torture and abuse of Bush at Guantánamo on January 20, 2009. 3 First detainees are transferred to through movement support, advocacy and prisoners at Abu-Ghraib prison became Obama has failed in his promise to close Guantánamo in January 2002. In February FOIA litigation: NDLON v. U.S. Immigration public in April 2004. CCR represents over the prison within one year, and nearly 3 2002, CCR filed the first habeas petitions, and Customs Enforcement Agency. 340 Iraqis suing private military contractors years into his presidency, has further arguing that indefinite detention without for participating in a torture conspiracy entrenched the harmful legal principles due process is a violation of U.S. and 6 The Supreme Court addressed important there and at facilities throughout Iraq (Al that surround it. CCR has represented men international law. In 2004 the Supreme civil and human rights issues during this Shimari v. CACI , Al-Quraishi v. Nakhla and detained at Guantánamo since 2002 and Court agreed, ruling that detainees do have past decade. CCR was at the Court L-3 and Saleh v. Titan) continues to demand that the prison be access to U.S. courts to challenge their defending habeas corpus in two shut immediately and that all the men there detention (Rasul v. Bush). Guantánamo cases (Rasul v. Bush and be tried or safely released. Boumediene v. Bush) and once in a challenge to the material support statute (Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project). Click on the case names for more information! Cover photo credits: 1) © Brooks Kraft/Corbis. 2) Nicholas Coster. 4) Nicholas Coster. 5) © DARREN HAUCK/epa/Corbis. 12) ©Getty Images. 13) Free Gaza movement. 14) © Brooks Kraft/Corbis. 15) © Shannon Stapleton/ Reuters/Corbis. 16) Thomas Hawk@Flickr. 17) AFP/Getty Images. 20) © Bud Shultz. 22) Mark Wilson/Getty Images. 23) © Jim Young/Reuters/Corbis. 24) © Greenpeace/Corbis/Sygma. 26) Nicholas Coster. Letter from the President en years ago, I watched as two planes flew into the World emergency exceptions after 9/11 are now a permanent part of our legal Trade Center. New Yorkers were terrified, shocked and sad- landscape. dened as our city became a pungent morgue. When the Bush T administration began to talk of war, CCR argued that these Ten years after 9/11 we can say with certainty that CCR has made a attacks should be treated as crimes and suspects tried in regular courts. real difference—taking on the most challenging issues of the day and lessening some of the government’s draconian practices. Unfortunately, war was the response. Congress gave the President the authority to make war against almost any nation, group or individual Despite increasing repression here at home, U.S. wars around the anywhere in the world. We waged war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, world, Guantánamo, and the impoverishment of billions, we see great Yemen and Somalia including through targeted assassinations and hope as millions take to the streets in Tunisia, Egypt, Syria and here at drones. These wars have now killed thousands of Americans and per- home in Wisconsin. None of us can predict the outcome of this new haps hundreds of thousands of others. activism, but we remain firmly on the side of the oppressed. This war paradigm and its misuse led to Guantánamo, secret “ghost” After almost ten years as President of CCR, I am relinquishing that job, detention sites, indefinite detention, military commissions, rendition, but not my deep involvement with the organization that has been my and the suspension of habeas corpus. It was also used to justify a dra- legal and political home for 40 years. A wonderful new President is matic curtailing of domestic civil rights: illegal wiretapping, increased stepping forward: Jules Lobel. Jules is a long-time board member, Vice- repression of dissent, and a culture of government secrecy. President, professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School and a major CCR litigator. He won an important Supreme Court challenge to solitary In 2002, CCR made the courageous decision to represent the first confinement practices at an Ohio “supermax” prison, litigated many detainees and in the years following, was able to get hundreds of of the 1980’s Central America war cases with CCR and came close to lawyers to Guantánamo. Lawyer visits helped to break the silence of stopping the 1991 invasion of Iraq—with a lawsuit no less. I am thrilled incommunicado detention that fostered torture and forced an exami- to have my longtime friend and smart, radical colleague as CCR’s new nation of who was there—not the worst of the worst, but hundreds President. picked up without cause. Six hundred men were freed. Today, 171 men remain at Guantánamo despite Obama’s promise to close it. The underlying policies that surround Guantánamo have in general been adopted by President Obama. Practices claimed as Michael Ratner 1 Letter from the Executive Director s the nation marks a decade’s passing since the 9/11 In February 2002, just six weeks after the first detainees were brought attacks, we at CCR are reflecting on the many changes to Guantánamo, we filed our first habeas petition,Rasul v. Bush. In to the world, our nation and this organization as a result 2011, nearly 600 men have been released from Guantánamo. CCR Aof the right-wing forces that seized upon this tragedy continues to work with them as they rebuild their lives and to advocate to implement massive changes to our democratic systems. CCR has on behalf of the 171 men that unjustly remain done amazing work over these years to push back forcefully and at the prison. eloquently against the Bush administration’s illegal executive power grab. We’ve also done key work to urge the Obama administration In April 2002, we filed Turkmen v. Ashcroft on behalf of Arab and to renounce the power that Bush claimed and to return it to the Muslim men who were rounded up in racial profiling dragnets and other branches of government and the people. It has been a subjected to abuse and detention, eventually winning a settlement tremendous and high stakes fight. Through it all, CCR has not on their behalf. In 2011, we filed a fourth complaint in that case with wavered in our principles. new evidence of high-level government officials’ complicity in those abuses. In 2005, we filed lawsuits against the Bush administration’s True to form, we take on the hard cases and the hard issues, taking illegal and warrantless wiretapping program and just this year we positions that are the right ones, but often ones that Congress, the filed an appeal asking the government to destroy any records of president, the courts and other people in America aren’t quite ready surveillance of CCR attorneys. to hear yet. To me that’s not a sign of failure, that’s a sign of strength. If the cases that we bring and the positions we advocate for were While we stay active in the defense of our liberties and human easy and noncontroversial, everyone else would be pushing them. rights, one clear battle is the protection of our right to dissent—to But, in a world where power is currency and currency is power, preserve and expand the First Amendment space within which there can be no shying away from what is right and what is just.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5 the Da Vinci Code Dan Brown
    The Da Vinci Code By: Dan Brown ISBN: 0767905342 See detail of this book on Amazon.com Book served by AMAZON NOIR (www.amazon-noir.com) project by: PAOLO CIRIO paolocirio.net UBERMORGEN.COM ubermorgen.com ALESSANDRO LUDOVICO neural.it Page 1 CONTENTS Preface to the Paperback Edition vii Introduction xi PART I THE GREAT WAVES OF AMERICAN WEALTH ONE The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: From Privateersmen to Robber Barons TWO Serious Money: The Three Twentieth-Century Wealth Explosions THREE Millennial Plutographics: American Fortunes 3 47 and Misfortunes at the Turn of the Century zoART II THE ORIGINS, EVOLUTIONS, AND ENGINES OF WEALTH: Government, Global Leadership, and Technology FOUR The World Is Our Oyster: The Transformation of Leading World Economic Powers 171 FIVE Friends in High Places: Government, Political Influence, and Wealth 201 six Technology and the Uncertain Foundations of Anglo-American Wealth 249 0 ix Page 2 Page 3 CHAPTER ONE THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES: FROM PRIVATEERSMEN TO ROBBER BARONS The people who own the country ought to govern it. John Jay, first chief justice of the United States, 1787 Many of our rich men have not been content with equal protection and equal benefits , but have besought us to make them richer by act of Congress. -Andrew Jackson, veto of Second Bank charter extension, 1832 Corruption dominates the ballot-box, the Legislatures, the Congress and touches even the ermine of the bench. The fruits of the toil of millions are boldly stolen to build up colossal fortunes for a few, unprecedented in the history of mankind; and the possessors of these, in turn, despise the Republic and endanger liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • Think Tanks in the United States and in China History and Contemporary Roles of Policy Research Institutes in Two 'Major Powers'
    Scuola in Relazioni Internazionali, c/o Dipartimento di Studi Linguistici e Culturali Comparati Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Relazioni Internazionali Comparate Comparative International Relations Tesi di Laurea Think tanks in the United States and in China History and contemporary roles of Policy Research Institutes in two 'major powers' Relatore Ch. Prof. Roberto Peruzzi Correlatore Ch. Prof. Duccio Basosi Laureanda Giulia Tibaldo Matricola 825362 Anno Accademico 2012 / 2013 INDEX INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................p. 5 1. IDEAS AND PUBLIC POLICY: THE BIRTH AND DEVELOPMENTS OF AMERICAN THINK TANKS FROM EARLY EXPERTS TO THE LATE 1980S...................................................................................................................p. 10 1.1. Ideas and Public Policy. Introduction.......................................................................p. 10 1.1.1. Various kinds of ideas within the Public Policy arena................................p. 10 1.1.2. The decision making process in the domestic and in the foreign policy domain: the greater difficulty of the International Sphere..........................p. 15 1.2. Epistemic Communities.............................................................................................p. 18 1.3. Knowledge and Power, Knowledge and Ambition: An historical reconstruction of the role of the Expert..................................................................................................p.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds an End to Antisemitism!
    Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds An End to Antisemitism! Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman Volume 5 Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman ISBN 978-3-11-058243-7 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-067196-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-067203-9 DOI https://10.1515/9783110671964 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Library of Congress Control Number: 2021931477 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, Lawrence H. Schiffman, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com Cover image: Illustration by Tayler Culligan (https://dribbble.com/taylerculligan). With friendly permission of Chicago Booth Review. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com TableofContents Preface and Acknowledgements IX LisaJacobs, Armin Lange, and Kerstin Mayerhofer Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds: Introduction 1 Confronting Antisemitism through Critical Reflection/Approaches
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 10, Number 11, March 22
    The Pope: poor nations need American-style technology Harold Brown's sabotage of beam weapons Germany shakier than ever after the elections The U.S. budget disaster: How the oligarchs' fondi created it EIR The special reports listed below, prepared by the EIR staff, are now available. 1. What is the Trilateral Commission? the demands being made by the International Mone­ The most complete analysis of the background, ori­ tary Fund for economic "reforms" in Mexico, and why gins, and goals of this much-talked-about organiza­ these demands are being resisted. Much information tion. Demonstrates the role of the Commission in the on Mexico's economic conditions and political fac­ Carter administration's Global 2000 and Global tions is included. $250. Futures reports on mass population reduction; in the Propaganda-2 Freemasonic scandal that collapsed 5. Who Controls Environmentalism? the Italian government in 1981; and in the Federal A history and detailed grid of the environmentalist Reserve's high interest-rate policy. Details the Com­ movement in the United States. Analyzes sources of mission's influence in the Reagan administration. In­ funding, political command structure, and future plans. cludes complete membership list. $100. $50. 2. The Global 2000 Report: Blueprint for Extinction 6. (J.S. Policy Toward Africa A scientific and political refutation of the Carter ad­ A case study of the "new" North-South policy of the ministration's Global 2000 Report. Includes a review of Reagan administration, showing how economic policy the report's contents, demonstrating that upwards of 2 toward Africa is being shaped according to the anti­ billion people will die if its recommendations are technology, zero-growth guidelines of the Carter ad­ followed; a detailed presentation of the organizations ministration's Global 2000 Report.
    [Show full text]
  • CCR Annual Report 2010
    Annual Report 2010 Resettlement U.N. Advocacy Supreme Court GTMO Client Legal Advocacy Legal Advocacy Delegation CCR Client Legal Advocacy Both Our Mission The Center for Constitutional Rights is a non-profit legal and educational organization dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change. CCR Annual Report 2010 Letter from the President 2 Letter from the Executive Director 3 Material Support 4 Guantánamo 6 International Human Rights 8 Policing and Prisons 14 Immigrant Justice 16 Employment Discrimination 18 Right to Dissent 20 Movement Support 22 CCR Media 24 Letter from the Legal Director 26 Case Index 27 Friends and Allies 37 2010 President’s Reception 42 CCR Donors 43 Board of Directors and Staff 56 Financial Report 58 In Memoriam 59 Rhonda Copelon Remembered 60 Letter from the President I look back on this last year at CCR with As our Guantánamo work begins to wind amazement. For those of us with progressive down, we have built up our involvement in politics and who believe in social justice, we other important areas. A good example is our are not in the best of times. Justice and equal- racial and economic justice docket which has ity have paid a high cost for years and years expanded significantly this year. In addition of conservative and moderate to our ongoing work fighting racial appointments to the courts and an profiling and employment discrimina- irresponsible “war-time” deference to tion and in defending the right to the executive branch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collection of Peggy and David Rockefeller to Be Sold to Benefit Charities
    THE COLLECTION OF PEGGY AND DAVID ROCKEFELLER TO BE SOLD TO BENEFIT CHARITIES COMMITMENT OF SALE PROCEEDS TO CHARITIES CONTINUES THE LONG LEGACY OF ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY CHRISTIE’S SELECTED TO MANAGE SPRING 2018 AUCTION OF OVER 2,000 ITEMS Peggy and David Rockefeller, May 1973. Photo: Arthur Lavine/Rockefeller Estate “Eventually all these objects which have brought so much pleasure to Peggy and me will go out into the world and will again be available to other caretakers who, hopefully, will derive the same satisfaction and joy from them as we have over these past several decades.” – David Rockefeller New York – The Estate of David Rockefeller, the youngest son of American philanthropist John D. Rockefeller, Jr. and art patron Abby Aldrich Rockefeller, will sell at Christie’s the personal collection of Peggy and David Rockefeller, which is estimated to include over 2,000 individual items and spans numerous collecting categories, in order to benefit a dozen charities. The sales will be conducted in keeping with David Rockefeller’s pledge to direct the majority of his wealth to philanthropy and provide for the cultural, educational, medical, and environmental causes long supported by both David and Peggy Rockefeller. A series of dedicated sales is slated for spring 2018 at Christie’s in Rockefeller Center in New York City. David Rockefeller, Jr. commented: “We are delighted to be partnering with Christie’s to create a significant fundraising opportunity for the philanthropies that are so important to the Rockefeller family. We are proud to fulfill my father’s wish to share with the world the art and objects he and my mother collected over a lifetime together, and use them as means to continue the long legacy of Rockefeller family philanthropy first established by John D.
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th Anniversary
    25th Anniversary Montblanc de la Culture 25th Anniversary Montblanc de la Culture Arts Patronage Award Arts Patronage Montblanc de la Culture 25th Anniversary Arts Patronage Award 1992 25th Anniversary Montblanc de la Culture Arts Patronage Award 2016 Anniversary 2016 CONTENT MONTBLANC DE LA CULTURE ARTS PATRONAGE AWARD 25th Anniversary — Preface 04 / 05 The Montblanc de la Culture Arts Patronage Award 06 / 09 Red Carpet Moments 10 / 11 25 YEARS OF PATRONAGE Patron of Arts — 2016 Peggy Guggenheim 12 / 23 2015 Luciano Pavarotti 24 / 33 2014 Henry E. Steinway 34 / 43 2013 Ludovico Sforza – Duke of Milan 44 / 53 2012 Joseph II 54 / 63 2011 Gaius Maecenas 64 / 73 2010 Elizabeth I 74 / 83 2009 Max von Oppenheim 84 / 93 2 2008 François I 94 / 103 3 2007 Alexander von Humboldt 104 / 113 2006 Sir Henry Tate 114 / 123 2005 Pope Julius II 124 / 133 2004 J. Pierpont Morgan 134 / 143 2003 Nicolaus Copernicus 144 / 153 2002 Andrew Carnegie 154 / 163 2001 Marquise de Pompadour 164 / 173 2000 Karl der Grosse, Hommage à Charlemagne 174 / 183 1999 Friedrich II the Great 184 / 193 1998 Alexander the Great 194 / 203 1997 Peter I the Great and Catherine II the Great 204 / 217 1996 Semiramis 218 / 227 1995 The Prince Regent 228 / 235 1994 Louis XIV 236 / 243 1993 Octavian 244 / 251 1992 Lorenzo de Medici 252 / 259 IMPRINT — Imprint 260 / 264 Content Anniversary Preface 2016 This year marks the 25th anniversary of the Montblanc Cultural Foundation: an occasion to acknowledge considerable achievements, while recognising the challenges that lie ahead. Since its inception in 1992, through its various yet interrelated programmes, the Foundation continues to appreciate the significant role that art can play in instigating key shifts, and at times, ruptures, in our perception of and engagement with the cultural, social and political conditions of our times.
    [Show full text]
  • John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937) Topic Guide for Chronicling America (
    John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937) Topic Guide for Chronicling America (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov) Introduction John D. Rockefeller was an oil industry tycoon and philanthropist who lived in Cleveland, Ohio. Born in New York in 1839, he moved with his family to northeast Ohio in 1853. At age sixteen, he began his involvement with the business world as an assistant bookkeeper for a produce commission business. He soon began his own produce commission company before joining the oil refinery industry in 1863. He established Standard Oil of Ohio in 1870, and this is where he made most of his wealth. By 1878, the company controlled 90% of all U.S. oil refineries (it was declared a trust by the U.S government in 1911). In addition to his business interests, Rockefeller regularly donated a portion of his income to charities supporting education and public health. Rockefeller died in 1937 and is buried in Lake View Cemetery in Cleveland. He is widely recognized as the wealthiest American of all time. Important Dates . July 8, 1839: John Davison Rockefeller is born in Richford, New York. 1853: The Rockefeller family moves to Strongsville, a suburb of Cleveland, Ohio. 1863: Rockefeller and business partner Maurice B. Clark build an oil refinery in “The Flats” area of Cleveland. 1864: Rockefeller marries Laura Celestia “Cettie” Spelman. January 10, 1870: Standard Oil of Ohio is formed and grows rapidly over the next decade, eventually forming a monopoly. 1903: Rockefeller’s General Education Board is founded. 1911: U.S. Supreme Court declares that Standard Oil Company of New Jersey is a trust, and it is broken into subsidiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: an Empirical Study
    © Reuters/HO Old – Detainees at XRay Camp in Guantanamo. The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empirical Study Benjamin Wittes and Zaahira Wyne with Erin Miller, Julia Pilcer, and Georgina Druce December 16, 2008 The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empiricial Study Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 The Public Record about Guantánamo 4 Demographic Overview 6 Government Allegations 9 Detainee Statements 13 Conclusion 22 Note on Sources and Methods 23 About the Authors 28 Endnotes 29 Appendix I: Detainees at Guantánamo 46 Appendix II: Detainees Not at Guantánamo 66 Appendix III: Sample Habeas Records 89 Sample 1 90 Sample 2 93 Sample 3 96 The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empiricial Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he following report represents an effort both to document and to describe in as much detail as the public record will permit the current detainee population in American T military custody at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Station in Cuba. Since the military brought the first detainees to Guantánamo in January 2002, the Pentagon has consistently refused to comprehensively identify those it holds. While it has, at various times, released information about individuals who have been detained at Guantánamo, it has always maintained ambiguity about the population of the facility at any given moment, declining even to specify precisely the number of detainees held at the base. We have sought to identify the detainee population using a variety of records, mostly from habeas corpus litigation, and we have sorted the current population into subgroups using both the government’s allegations against detainees and detainee statements about their own affiliations and conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rockefeller Morgans
    Rockefeller 11.09 10/20/09 2:27 PM Page 2 n occasion, visitors to Acadia National Park or The most notable feature of the Rockefeller State Park the Rockefeller State Park Preserve might see a Preserve, located in Pocantico Hills in Westchester County, pair or four-in-hand of lovely bay Morgans out New York, is the system of carriage roads built by John D. on the carriage roads. The turn-out will be Rockefeller, Sr. and John D. Rockefeller, Jr. The venue’s web- Oimpeccable and the horses well mannered and eye-catching, site describes the trails’ sensitivity to their setting: “designed making on-lookers wonder just who they are? to complement the landscape, the carriage roads wind They are the Rockefeller Morgans. through wetlands, woodlands, meadows, and fields and past John D. Rockefeller, Jr. was considered an expert horse- streams, rivers, and lakes. They traverse wood and stone man and preferred driving horses to automobiles. His love bridges, including the first triple arch bridge in America, of horses spurred the carriage road project on Mount and are open to the public for hiking and horse activity.” Desert Island, Maine (Acadia National Park) which resulted “We have always had Morgans to drive,” recalls David in over 50 miles of road specifically designed for carriage Rockefeller, the youngest of John D. Rockefeller, Jr.’s chil- travel graded to allow for easy pulling by horses, almost all dren and at 94, still driving his Morgans. “I believe my of which is still maintained and used today. The carriage father became interested in the breed as driving horses and roads are part of the National Park and open to the public since they are such wonderful horses, we kept that tradi- for hiking, biking and horse activity, with additional car- tion.” That tradition has been embraced by others through riage roads, open to horses only, recently opened on the generations: David Rockefeller’s late wife, Peggy, was an Rockefeller family land.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving Social Goals Through Real Property Tax Programs
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 16 Issue 2 Spring Article 1 Spring 4-17-2021 Balancing the Carrot and the Stick: Achieving Social Goals Through Real Property Tax Programs Ryan F. Bender [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, Taxation-State and Local Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation Ryan F. Bender, Balancing the Carrot and the Stick: Achieving Social Goals Through Real Property Tax Programs, 16 NW. J. L. & SOC. POL'Y. 1 (2021). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol16/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2021 by Ryan F. Bender Volume 16 (Spring 2021) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy Balancing the Carrot and the Stick: Achieving Social Goals Through Real Property Tax Programs Ryan F. Bender** ABSTRACT The sharp and growing wealth divide in the United States has elicited significant media and public attention over the past decade, with loud calls for achieving social goals through tax system change. While wealth preservation loopholes in the Internal Revenue Code can contribute to wealth inequalities, tax policies that incentivize socially responsible, tax efficient investment offer an attractive tool for estate planning professionals while also promoting social impact programs. Additionally, while direct government investments into low-income community development, land preservation, and food security are important drivers of change, tax policies that push private capital into these causes are equally important to making a social impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Returns from Guantanamo to Yemen WATCH
    United States/Yemen HUMAN No Direction Home RIGHTS Returns from Guantanamo to Yemen WATCH No Direction Home Returns from Guantanamo to Yemen Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-466-4 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org March 2009 1-56432-466-4 No Direction Home Returns from Guantanamo to Yemen Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 6 To the Government of the United States ...................................................................................... 6 To the Government of Yemen ...................................................................................................... 6 To the League of Arab States, Member States of the European Union, and United Nations Specialized Programs .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]