Breeding Seasons, Molt Patterns, and Gender and Age Criteria for Selected Northeastern Costa Rican Resident Landbirds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Breeding Seasons, Molt Patterns, and Gender and Age Criteria for Selected Northeastern Costa Rican Resident Landbirds The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121(3):556–567, 2009 BREEDING SEASONS, MOLT PATTERNS, AND GENDER AND AGE CRITERIA FOR SELECTED NORTHEASTERN COSTA RICAN RESIDENT LANDBIRDS JARED D. WOLFE,1,2,4 PETER PYLE,3 AND C. JOHN RALPH2 ABSTRACT.—Detailed accounts of molt and breeding cycles remain elusive for the majority of resident tropical bird species. We used data derived from a museum review and 12 years of banding data to infer breeding seasonality, molt patterns, and age and gender criteria for 27 common landbird species in northeastern Costa Rica. Prealternate molts appear to be rare, only occurring in one species (Sporophila corvina), while presupplemental molts were not detected. Most of our study species (70%) symmetrically replace flight feathers during the absence of migrant birds; molting during this period may limit resource competition during an energetically taxing phase of the avian life-cycle. Received 30 August 2008. Accepted 19 February 2009. Temporal patterns of molt and breeding sea- of the avian life cycle, but other factors including sonality are largely unknown for many resident climate and resource availability may also affect tropical species (Dickey and van Rossem 1938, timing of molt (Aidley and Wilkinson 1987, Snow and Snow 1964, Snow 1976) in contrast to Bensch et al. 1991, Jones 1995). Little has been Nearctic-Neotropic migrants (hereafter ‘mi- published concerning temporal patterns of molt grants’). One might assume differential molt among resident tropical species in relation to sequences and extent between latitudes given competition from overwintering migrants despite different natural histories of resident tropical birds continued interest in factors influencing timing of in relation to their migrant counterparts. However, molt (Snow and Snow 1964). Given the energet- preliminary studies indicate that most neotropical ically taxing nature of molt, we believe temporal residents exhibit molt strategies similar to those in patterns of molt among resident species may be temperate latitudes (Dickey and van Rossem influenced by resource competition associated 1938, Diamond 1974, Foster 1975, Prys-Jones with presence or absence of migrant birds. Molt is 1982, Pyle et al. 2004, Ryder and Wolfe 2009, a critical facet of avian natural history and molt Wolfe et al. 2009). These strategies include partial ecology has utilitarian characteristics which aid in to incomplete preformative molts and complete understanding population structure and demo- prebasic molts that often occur in June–Septem- graphic trends. ber, following breeding. Capture-recapture, capture-telemetry, and cap- Molt and breeding events are energetically ture-observational data are often used to quantify demanding and, for the most part, independent demographic trends of resident neotropical land- phases of the avian life cycle (Snow and Snow birds (Greenberg and Gradwohl 1997, Sandercock 1964, Payne 1972, Avery 1985, Pyle 1997). et al. 2000, Cohen and Lindell 2004). Accurately However, overlap between molt and breeding modeling population structure requires methodol- has been documented in a few temperate landbirds ogy pertaining to identification of age and gender (Bancroft and Woolfenden 1982, Thompson and classes. Thus, understanding the extent and Slack 1983, Zaias and Breitwisch 1989, Hemborg sequence of molt for a given species is critical 1999) and some resident tropical landbirds for accurate age classification and subsequent (Dickey and van Rossem 1938, Snow and Snow demographic analyses. 1964, Foster 1975, Avery 1985). Breeding and The Tortuguero Integrated Bird Monitoring molt seasonality influence the temporal dynamics Project (TIBMP) was established in 1994 on the northern Caribbean coast of Costa Rica, near the 1 Humboldt State University, Wildlife Department, 1 village of Tortuguero, to monitor migrants as well Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA. as resident bird populations through constant- 2 USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research effort mist-netting (Ralph et al. 2005). We used Station, Redwood Sciences Laboratory, 1700 Bayview 12 years of banding data from TIBMP coupled Drive, Arcata, CA 95521, USA. 3 Institute for Bird Populations, P. O. Box 1346, Point with a review of museum specimens to provide Reyes Station, CA 94956, USA. information on molt and breeding seasonality, and 4 Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] useful criteria for identification of age and gender 556 Wolfe et al. N MOLT AND BREEDING CYCLES OF COSTA RICAN BIRDS 557 for 27 resident bird species of northeastern Costa Formative-plumaged individuals are often identi- Rica. fiable by retained primary coverts which typically lack distinctive edging, luster, and are typically METHODS more worn in relation to definitive primary Nine monitoring sites were near the village of coverts and contrast in wear with replaced greater Tortuguero on the northeast coast of Costa Rica in coverts. Definitive flight feathers are typically Limon Province (83u 319 70 W, 10u 339 510 N; more truncate in relation to retained juvenile elevation 0–20 m). One ‘central’ station was flight feathers. We specifically looked for each of operated at least five times every 10 days while these criteria for banded birds (using standardized the remaining ‘satellite’ stations were operated at data forms) and museum specimens. least once every 10 days. Between 10 and 15 12- Molt and age terminology, including standard m mist nets were operated at each site by JDW abbreviations, follow those of Pyle (1997) as and others from August to May, 1994–2006 modified by Howell et al. (2003). The first basic (Ralph et al. 2005). Species studied were selected plumage is referred to as juvenile plumage (Juv), based on high capture rates during preliminary followed by the preformative molt (PF), first banding efforts (1994–2000). Protocols pertaining prealternate molt (PA1; if existing in the species), to captured birds follow Ralph et al. (1996). second prebasic molt (PB2), and definitive Banding efforts were not sustained during June prealternate (DPA; if existing) and definitive and July. Breeding seasonality during these prebasic (DPB) molts. Primaries and primary months was inferred based on brood patch and coverts are numbered from the innermost (prima- cloacal protuberance data obtained during May ry 1) to the outermost (primary 9 or 10), and August, juxtaposition of the prebasic molt, secondaries and the greater coverts are numbered and presence of juveniles. Recaptured individuals from the outermost (secondary 1) to the innermost in many cases were used to verify age; our sample tertial, and rectrices are numbered from the sizes include recaptured individuals as well. central pair (rectrix 1) to the outermost pair Findings based on banded birds at Tortuguero (rectrix 5 or 6). ‘‘Partial’’ for molt extent, were augmented by those from specimens exam- indicates that no flight feathers (primaries, ined at the National Museum of Natural History primary coverts, secondaries, or rectrices) were (USNM) by Pyle in early August 2001. All replaced (except the tertials or central rectrices in specimens from selected species collected in some individuals) and ‘‘incomplete’’ indicates southern Mexico through northern Panama were that some but not all flight feathers were replaced. examined and, in a few cases, specimens collected An ‘‘eccentric molt pattern’’ refers to an incom- in South America were also examined. Ages of plete molt in which molt of primaries begins at a birds were inferred when collected and, in many central feather (other than primary 1) and cases, there were no specimens collected while in proceeds distally, and molt of secondaries begins active molt. Plumage succession and molt timing with a central feather (other than secondary 1) and could often be assumed based on molt limits and proceeds proximally to the tertials (Pyle 1997, extent of feather wear (Pyle 1997). Criteria Pyle et al. 2004). The ‘‘typical molt sequence’’, developed with specimens in 2001 were con- which can be incomplete during preformative firmed or re-examined with analysis of banding molts, refers to a molt proceeding distally from data from 1994 to 2006. Banding/specimen data primary 1 and proximally from secondary 1, as is were augmented with information provided by typical of definitive prebasic molts. Stiles and Skutch (1989). Age classification follows the calendar-based The partial to incomplete nature of the system described by Pyle (1997). Age codes preformative molt in most neotropical resident include HY (hatching year), indicating a bird in landbird species can be used to facilitate accurate the calendar year of its hatching; SY (second age-class categorization of captured birds (Pyle year), indicating a bird in its second calendar year 1997). Feather characteristics, regarding molt (HY/SY indicates a bird in its first plumage cycle, limits and retained juvenile (HY) plumage among being HY until 31 Dec and SY after 1 Jan); TY tropical residents, appears to be similar to those of (third year), indicating a bird in its third calendar temperate species. For example, retained juvenile year; AHY (after-hatching year), indicating a bird retrices are often duller in coloration, more worn in at least its second calendar year; ASY (after- (in relation to definitive retrices) and tapered. second year), indicating a bird in at least its third 558 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 121, No. 3, September 2009 calendar year; ATY (after-third year), indicating a nape, and buff or whitish tipping to back feathers, bird in at least its fourth calendar year; and U tertials, and most wing coverts, absent in definitive (unknown), indicating a bird that may or may not plumage. More pointed rectrices with a deeper be in the calendar year of birth. Month ranges in white triangle at the tip (.5 mm along shaft) and parentheses indicate the timing for which ages can brownish along outer webs not extending toward be identified; e.g., ‘‘HY/SY (Oct–Sep)’’ indicates the shaft may represent HY/SYs; more study a bird with indicative criteria, usually based on an needed. Bill corrugations present in HY/SYs aspect of juvenal or formative plumage and the year-round.
Recommended publications
  • SAB 019 1999 P272-280 Seasonal Movements and Conservation Of
    Studies in Avian Biology No. 19:272-280, 1999. SEASONAL MOVEMENTS AND CONSERVATION OF SEEDEATERS OF THE GENUS SPOROPHZIA IN SOUTH AMERICA Jose MARIA CARDOSO DA SILVA Abstract. Small seed-eating finches of the genus Sporophila, commonly called seedeaters, are among the most characteristic elements of South Americas’ grassland avifauna. Twenty-three species of Spa- rophila seedeaters were classified into three groups according to their seasonal movements. Fourteen species make long-distance movements between at least two major ecological regions in South Amer- ica, four species make intermediate to long-distance movements within a single ecological region, and five species make short-distance movements between adjacent habitats. The grasslands in the Cerrado region seem to be the most important wintering sites for most of the long-distance migrant Sporophila. Mapping the ranges of all threatened or near-threatened Sporophila species identified seven critical areas between southern coastal Colombia and southernmost Brazil. Creating reserves in these seven areas would protect at least one population of 23 Sporophilu species. Mapping the ranges of all species and well-marked subspecies with restricted ranges (350,000 square kilometers or less) identified nine critical areas (five of which were also identified by mapping threatened or near-threatened species) between northern South America and southernmost Brazil. Creating reserves in these nine areas would protect populations of 29 species or well-defined subspecies of Sporophila.The conservation of South American grasslands needs urgent action. The areas identified here are important grassland habitats that should be priority areas for organizations and agencies interested in grassland conservation. LOS MOVIMIENTOS ESTACIONALES Y LA CONSERVACIGN DE GRANIVOROS DEL GENERO SPOROPHILA EN AMERICA DEL SUR Sinopsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the Sayaca Tanager (Thraupis Sayaca)In Southeast Brazil A
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY 2019, VOL. 53, NOS. 39–40, 2397–2412 https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2019.1704462 Breeding biology of the Sayaca Tanager (Thraupis sayaca)in southeast Brazil A. F. Batisteli a, E. N. da Silva Netoa, T. P. Soaresb, M. A. Pizo c and H. Sarmento d aPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil; bCentro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil; cInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Rio Claro, Brazil; dDepartamento de Hidrobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Thraupis is a genus of the American endemic Thraupidae (subfamily Received 15 July 2019 Thraupinae), comprising seven species that inhabit tropical forests Accepted 10 December 2019 to urban centres. The Sayaca Tanager (Thraupis sayaca)is KEYWORDS a disturbance-tolerant species of high representativeness in plant- Neotropical; nesting frugivore networks, but information on its breeding biology is behaviour; parental care; scarce and often restricted to non-systematic surveys. We studied Thraupidae; urban bird the breeding biology of the T. sayaca, following 39 active nests in a periurban area of southeast Brazil during two breeding seasons (2017/2018, 2018/2019). The breeding season ranged from early September to middle December, and the nests were placed in native and exotic plants and human buildings (nest height above ground: 3.35 ± 1.73 m, mean ± SD). Only females incubated and brooded, but both adults built the nests, fed the nestlings, and removed their faecal sacs.
    [Show full text]
  • When Black Plus White Equals Gray: the Nature of Variation in the Variable Seedeater Complex (Emberizinae: Sporophila)
    Volume 7 1996 No.2 ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 7: 75-107, 1996 CiJ'The Neotropical Ornithological Society WHEN BLACK PLUS WHITE EQUALS GRAY: THE NATURE OF VARIATION IN THE VARIABLE SEEDEATER COMPLEX (EMBERIZINAE: SPOROPHILA) F. Gary Stiles Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. Resumen. Las afinidades taxon6micas del Espiguero Variable (Sporophila aurita) yel Espiguero Alifajeado (S. ameri- cana) han sido discutidos por más de 80 años. El descubrimiento de una zona de hibridizaci6n entre el primero y el Espiguero Gris (S. intermedia) -anteriormente no considerado como emparentado debido a que el plumaje definitivo del 0" es gris, no blanco y negro -me estimul6 a reexaminar esta cuesti6n. Mi hip6tesis de trabajo era que existiera una relaci6n estrecha entre todas estas formas. Esta hip6tesis fue apoyada por la gran similitud morfol6gica y las distribuciones casi perfectamente complementarias de todas ellas, la identificaci6n de otra zona de solapamiento y hibridizaci6n limitada, y por la existencia de variaci6n previamente ignorada dentro de la especie intermedia. Concluyo que S. intermedia es un miembro integral del llamado "complejo del Espiguero Variable", y que ésto constituye un grupo monofilético reconocible al nivel de superespecie.Los patrones de distri- buci6n geográfica y divergencia morfol6gica me permiten reconocer los siguientes cuatro aloespecies: S. corvina (Espiguero Variable); S. intermedia (Espiguero Gris); S. murallae (Espiguero del Caquetá); y S. americana (Espigue- ro Alifajeado). Con base en un análises cuantitativo de la variaci6n dentro de S. intermedia, llego a la conclusi6n de que la subespecie agustini no es reconocibre, como tampoco lo es S.
    [Show full text]
  • External Examination of Seabirds: Plumage & Morphometrics
    External Examination of Seabirds: Plumage & Morphometrics Quantitative analysis of form, encompasses size and shape Seabird Topography ➢ Naming Conventions: • Parts of the body • Types of feathers (Harrison 1983) Types of Feathers Coverts: Rows bordering and overlaying the edges of the tail and wings on both the lower and upper sides of the body. Help streamline shape of the wings and tail and provide the bird with insulation. Feather Tracks ➢ Feathers are not attached randomly. • They occur in linear tracts called pterylae. • Spaces on bird's body without feather tracts are called apteria. • Densest area for feather tracks is head and neck. • Feathers arranged in distinct layers: contour feathers overlay down. Generic Pterylae Types of Feathers Contour feathers: outermost feathers. Define the color and shape of the bird. Contour feathers lie on top of each other, like shingles on a roof. Shed water, keeping body dry and insulated. Each contour feather controlled by specialized muscles which control their position, allowing the bird to keep the feathers in clean and neat condition. Specialized contour feathers used for flight: delineate outline of wings and tail. Types of Feathers Flight feathers – special contour feathers Define outline of wings and tail Long and stiff Asymmetrical those on wings are called remiges (singular remex) those on tail are called retrices (singular retrix) Types of Flight Feathers Remiges: Largest contour feathers (primaries / secondaries) Responsible for supporting bird during flight. Attached by ligaments or directly to the wing bone. Types of Flight Feathers Flight feathers – special contour feathers Rectrices: tail feathers provide flight stability and control. Connected to each other by ligaments, with only the inner- most feathers attached to bone.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Sep 2018 Lists of Victims and Hosts of the Parasitic
    version: 21 Sep 2018 Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic cowbirds (Molothrus). Peter E. Lowther, Field Museum Brood parasitism is an awkward term to describe an interaction between two species in which, as in predator-prey relationships, one species gains at the expense of the other. Brood parasites "prey" upon parental care. Victimized species usually have reduced breeding success, partly because of the additional cost of caring for alien eggs and young, and partly because of the behavior of brood parasites (both adults and young) which may directly and adversely affect the survival of the victim's own eggs or young. About 1% of all bird species, among 7 families, are brood parasites. The 5 species of brood parasitic “cowbirds” are currently all treated as members of the genus Molothrus. Host selection is an active process. Not all species co-occurring with brood parasites are equally likely to be selected nor are they of equal quality as hosts. Rather, to varying degrees, brood parasites are specialized for certain categories of hosts. Brood parasites may rely on a single host species to rear their young or may distribute their eggs among many species, seemingly without regard to any characteristics of potential hosts. Lists of species are not the best means to describe interactions between a brood parasitic species and its hosts. Such lists do not necessarily reflect the taxonomy used by the brood parasites themselves nor do they accurately reflect the complex interactions within bird communities (see Ortega 1998: 183-184). Host lists do, however, offer some insight into the process of host selection and do emphasize the wide variety of features than can impact on host selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird) Species List
    Aves (Bird) Species List Higher Classification1 Kingdom: Animalia, Phyllum: Chordata, Class: Reptilia, Diapsida, Archosauria, Aves Order (O:) and Family (F:) English Name2 Scientific Name3 O: Tinamiformes (Tinamous) F: Tinamidae (Tinamous) Great Tinamou Tinamus major Highland Tinamou Nothocercus bonapartei O: Galliformes (Turkeys, Pheasants & Quail) F: Cracidae Black Guan Chamaepetes unicolor (Chachalacas, Guans & Curassows) Gray-headed Chachalaca Ortalis cinereiceps F: Odontophoridae (New World Quail) Black-breasted Wood-quail Odontophorus leucolaemus Buffy-crowned Wood-Partridge Dendrortyx leucophrys Marbled Wood-Quail Odontophorus gujanensis Spotted Wood-Quail Odontophorus guttatus O: Suliformes (Cormorants) F: Fregatidae (Frigatebirds) Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens O: Pelecaniformes (Pelicans, Tropicbirds & Allies) F: Ardeidae (Herons, Egrets & Bitterns) Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis O: Charadriiformes (Sandpipers & Allies) F: Scolopacidae (Sandpipers) Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularius O: Gruiformes (Cranes & Allies) F: Rallidae (Rails) Gray-Cowled Wood-Rail Aramides cajaneus O: Accipitriformes (Diurnal Birds of Prey) F: Cathartidae (Vultures & Condors) Black Vulture Coragyps atratus Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura F: Pandionidae (Osprey) Osprey Pandion haliaetus F: Accipitridae (Hawks, Eagles & Kites) Barred Hawk Morphnarchus princeps Broad-winged Hawk Buteo platypterus Double-toothed Kite Harpagus bidentatus Gray-headed Kite Leptodon cayanensis Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus Ornate Hawk-Eagle Spizaetus ornatus Red-tailed
    [Show full text]
  • Screaming Biplane Dromaeosaurs of the Air. June/July
    5c.r~i~ ~l'tp.,ne pr~tl\USp.,urs 1tke.A-ir Written & illustrated by Gregory s. Paul It is questionable whether anyone even speculated that some dinosaurs were feathered until Ostrom detailed the evidence that birds descended from predatory avepod theropods a third of a century ago. The first illustration of a feathered dinosaur was a nice little study of a well ensconced Syntarsus dashing down a dune slope in pursuit of a gliding lizard in Robert Bakker's classic "Dinosaur Renaissance" article in the April 1975 Scientific American by Sarah Landry (can also be seen in the Scientific American Book of the Dinosaur I edited). My first feathered dinosaur was executed shortly after, an inappropriately shaggy Allosaurus attacking a herd of Diplodocus. I was soon doing a host of small theropods in feathers. Despite the logic of feath- / er insulation on the group ancestral birds and showing evidence of a high level energetics, images of feathered avepods were often harshly and unsci- Above: Proposed relationships based on flight adaptations of entifically criticized as unscientific in view of the lack of evidence for their preserved skeletons and feathers of Archaeopteryx, a generalized presence, ignoring the equal fact that no one had found scales on the little Sinornithosaurus, and Confuciusornis, with arrows indicating dinosaurs either. derived adaptations not present in Archaeopteryx as described in In the 1980s I further proposed that the most bird-like, avepectoran text. Not to scale. dinosaurs - dromaeosaurs, troodonts, oviraptorosaurs, and later ther- izinosaurs _were not just close to birds and the origin of flight, but were see- appear to represent the remnants of wings converted to display devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Erythristic Eggs
    March 1966 Vol. 78, No. 1 GENERALNOTES 127 A partly chestnut specimen of Variable Seedeater.-On 30 March 1963, on the Navy pipeline near Gamboa, Panama Canal Zone, Horace Loftin and I collected an adult male Variable Seedeater (Sporophila aurita) with a considerable amount of chest- nut in the plumage. There is a faint chestnut malar stripe and a narrow transverse band of chestnut across the throat. The flanks and crissum are chestnut and the only remaining white is the speculum and lining of the wing and the midline of the abdomen. The rest of the plumage is solid black. The bill shape and measurements are average for Sporophila aurita aurita. The skin is now in the American Museum of Natural History. This species is extremely variable in Panama in regard to the extent of black and white in the plumage, and it is of interest that the chestnut in this specimen is present only in those places where black replaces white in blackish individuals of S. a. aurita- not in the speculum and lining of the wing and the midline of the abdomen, which remain white in such individuals. Mr. Eugene Eisenmann (whose aid is gratefully apprecrated) wrrtes me that the collection of the American Museum contains no other such example and that he knows of none reported in the literature. The occasional occurrence of chestnut in place of black is known in the usually all black Thick-billed Seed-Finch (Oryzoborus funereus), an allied bird of similar distribu- tion. Wetmore (1957. Smithsonian Misc. Coil., 134:102-103) rejects de Schauensees’ lumping of funereus in the same species with the South American 0.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tumaco Seedeater (Sporophila Insulata, Emberizidae): a Species That Never Was ?
    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 15: 17–30, 2004 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society THE TUMACO SEEDEATER (SPOROPHILA INSULATA, EMBERIZIDAE): A SPECIES THAT NEVER WAS ? F. Gary Stiles Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, Bogotá, Colombia & Department of Ornithology, Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA E-mail: [email protected] Resumen. – El Espiguero de Tumaco (Sporophila insulata, Emberizidae): ¿Una especie que nunca la era? – El Espiguero de Tumaco, Sporophila insulata, generalmente se considera una especie endémica de Colombia y en peligro crítico de extinción. Con base en un reconocimiento breve de los plumajes de los machos en una población silvestre y la colección de tres ejemplares (los primeros desde la colección de la serie típica hace 80 años), examinación de esta serie típica y de series largas de ejemplares de los Espigue- ros Golicastaño (S. telasco) y Menudo (S. minuta), dos posibles parientes, concluyo que S. insulata debe con- siderarse como una subespecie o morfo del primero y que no está emparentado con el segundo. En S. telasco la extensión del castaño del plumaje ventral parece no cambiar con la edad, y lo mismo probable- mente ocurre en insulata; el plumaje dorsal parece un mejor indicativo de la edad. Hembras de las dos son indistinguibles, y no hay indicios confiables de aislamiento reproductivo. Por lo tanto, fenotipos interme- dios (los cuales se constituyen en la mayoría de los machos en las poblaciones cerca de Tumaco) deben representar el resultado de entrecruzamiento libre, lo cual posiblemente se ve facilitado por los hábitos nómadas de estas poblaciones.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oldest Record of Ornithuromorpha from the Early Cretaceous of China
    ARTICLE Received 6 Jan 2015 | Accepted 20 Mar 2015 | Published 5 May 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7987 OPEN The oldest record of ornithuromorpha from the early cretaceous of China Min Wang1, Xiaoting Zheng2,3, Jingmai K. O’Connor1, Graeme T. Lloyd4, Xiaoli Wang2,3, Yan Wang2,3, Xiaomei Zhang2,3 & Zhonghe Zhou1 Ornithuromorpha is the most inclusive clade containing extant birds but not the Mesozoic Enantiornithes. The early evolutionary history of this avian clade has been advanced with recent discoveries from Cretaceous deposits, indicating that Ornithuromorpha and Enantiornithes are the two major avian groups in Mesozoic. Here we report on a new ornithuromorph bird, Archaeornithura meemannae gen. et sp. nov., from the second oldest avian-bearing deposits (130.7 Ma) in the world. The new taxon is referable to the Hongshanornithidae and constitutes the oldest record of the Ornithuromorpha. However, A. meemannae shows few primitive features relative to younger hongshanornithids and is deeply nested within the Hongshanornithidae, suggesting that this clade is already well established. The new discovery extends the record of Ornithuromorpha by five to six million years, which in turn pushes back the divergence times of early avian lingeages into the Early Cretaceous. 1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China. 2 Institue of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong 276000, China. 3 Tianyu Natural History Museum of Shandong, Pingyi, Shandong 273300, China. 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2019, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of the Wing-Barred Seedeater, Sporophila Americana (Gmelin, 1789) (Thraupidae), for Acre and a Revision of Its Distribution in the Brazilian Amazon
    12 2 1853 the journal of biodiversity data 9 March 2016 Check List NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 12(2): 1853, 9 March 2016 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.2.1853 ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors First records of the Wing-barred Seedeater, Sporophila americana (Gmelin, 1789) (Thraupidae), for Acre and a revision of its distribution in the Brazilian Amazon Edson Guilherme1*, Diego Pedroza2, David Pedroza Guimarães4 and Ana Caroline Gomes de Lima4 1 Universidade Federal do Acre, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Natureza, Laboratório de Ornitologia. Campus Universitário, BR 364, Km 04. Distrito industrial. Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil. CEP: 69.920-9002 2 Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Grupo de Ecologia de Vertebrados Terrestres, IDSM/ECOVERT. Estrada do Bexiga, N° 2.584. Bairro: Fonte Boa. Tefé, Amazonas. CEP: 69.553-225 3 Universidade do Estado do Amazonas. Estrada do Bexiga, N° 1085, Bairro: Jerusalém. Tefé, Amazonas, Brasil. CEP: 69.553-225 4 Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Centro Vocacional Tecnológico, IDSM/CVT. Estrada do Bexiga, N° 2.584. Bairro: Fonte Boa. Tefé, Amazonas. CEP: 69.553-225 * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We present the first records of the Wing- Based on its geographic distribution and morphological barred Seedeater (Sporophila americana) in Acre, Brazil. differences, Stiles (1996) showed that the S. murallae These observations, together with the published records form is distinct from the S. americana form, and should and the specimens housed in museum collections, be considered to be a full species. Following this separa- indicate that S.
    [Show full text]
  • Alula Characteristics As Indicators of Golden-Cheeked Warbler Age
    Alula Characteristics as Indicators of Golden-cheeked Warbler Age Rebecca G. Peak and Daniel J. Lusk (SY) birds from older age classes. Dwight (1900) P.O. Box 5190 first illustrated the utility of molt limits in ageing Fort Hood, TX 76544 passerines. More recent literature on the use of molt [email protected] limits to age North American passerines provide detailed descriptions ofhow to distinguish different feather generations from each other for a variety of ABSTRACT species (Yunick 1984, Pyle et al. 1987, Mulvihill 1993, Pyle 1997a, Pyle 1997b ). We assessed the alula ofGolden-cheeked Warblers (Dendroica chrysoparia) to determine its usefulness Dendroica warblers retain greater primary coverts as a criterion for age determination. We compared (hereafter "primary coverts") from the juvenal the alula to the greater secondary coverts for color plumage but replace greater secondary coverts contrast and examined it for presence of white. (hereafter "greater coverts") during the first Overall, 98.2% ofsecond-year birds had an alula/ prebasic molt (Pyle et al. 1987). Hence, greater secondary covert contrast; whereas, I 00% comparison of color and extent of wear between of after-second-year birds did not have a contrast these feather groups is useful for ageing members between these feather groups. All after-second­ of this genus. The contrast between primary and year birds had white on the alula. Our data greater coverts can be challenging for inexperi­ demonstrate that these characteristics are reliable enced banders to recognize. These feather groups indicators of age for Golden-cheeked Warblers. are small, the color difference is often difficult for Still, we advocate using them in combination with the untrained eye to discern, and some of these existing ageing criteria to enhance the confidence species replace the inner greater coverts during of banders' age determinations, especially during prealternate molts.
    [Show full text]