Human Rights: a Brief Introduction Stephen P
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Human Rights: A Brief Introduction Stephen P. Marks Harvard University © Harvard University 2016 Marks 1 Human Rights Human Rights: A Brief Introduction Stephen P. Marks Harvard University I: Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Human rights in ethics, law and social activism ......................................................................... 1 A. Human rights as ethical concerns ........................................................................................... 2 B. Human rights as legal rights (positive law tradition) .............................................................. 3 C. Human rights as social claims ................................................................................................ 4 III: Historical milestones ................................................................................................................. 5 IV: Tensions and controversies about human rights today ............................................................. 7 A. Why do sovereign states accept human rights obligations? ................................................... 7 B. How do we know which rights are recognized as human rights? ........................................... 8 Table 1: List of human rights .............................................................................................. 9 C. Are human rights the same for everyone? ............................................................................ 11 D. How are human rights put into practice? .............................................................................. 13 1. The norm-creating process ................................................................................................ 13 Table 2: Norm-creating process ........................................................................................ 13 2. The norm-enforcing process .............................................................................................. 14 3. Continuing and new challenges to human rights realization ............................................ 16 Table 3: Means and methods of human rights implementation ........................................ 17 V: Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 18 Selected bibliography .................................................................................................................... 19 Selected websites ........................................................................................................................... 19 Universal Declaration of Human Rights ....................................................................................... 21 discourse and some historical background of I: Introduction the concept of human rights, this essay will examine the tensions between human rights Human rights constitute a set of norms and state sovereignty, the challenges to the governing the treatment of individuals and universality of human rights, the groups by states and non-state actors on the enumeration of rights recognized by the basis of ethical principles regarding what international community, and the means society considers fundamental to a decent available to translate the high aspirations of life. These norms are incorporated into human rights into practice. national and international legal systems, which specify mechanisms and procedures II. Human rights in ethics, law and to hold the duty-bearers accountable and provide redress for alleged victims of human social activism rights violations. There are numerous theoretical debates After a brief discussion of the use of surrounding the origins, scope and human rights in ethical, legal and advocacy significance of human rights in political © Harvard University 2016 Marks 2 Human Rights science, moral philosophy, and can draw on concepts such as natural law, jurisprudence. Roughly speaking, invoking social contract, justice as fairness, the term “human rights” (which is often consequentialism and other theories of referred to as “human rights discourse” or justice. In all these philosophical traditions, “human rights talk”) is based on moral a right is conceived as an entitlement of reasoning (ethical discourse), socially individuals, either by virtue of being human sanctioned norms (legal/political discourse) or because they are members of a political or social mobilization (advocacy discourse). community (citizens). In law, however, a These three types of discourse are by no right is any legally protected interest, means alternative or sequential but are all whatever the social consequence of the used in different contexts, depending on enforcement of the right on the wellbeing of who is invoking human rights discourse, to persons other than the right-holder (e.g., the whom they are addressing their claims, and property right of a landlord to evict a tenant, what they expect to gain by doing so. The the right of a business to earn profits). To three types of discourse are inter-related in avoid confusion, it is helpful to use the term the sense that public reasoning based on “human right” or its equivalent ethical arguments and social mobilization (“fundamental right,” “basic freedom,” based on advocacy agendas influence legal “constitutional right”) to refer to a higher- norms, processes and institutions and thus order right, authoritatively defined and all three modes of discourse contribute to carrying the expectation that it has a human rights becoming part of social reality. peremptory character and thus prevails over other (ordinary) rights and reflects the A. Human rights as ethical concerns essential values of the society adopting it. Human rights have in common an Ethical and religious precepts determine ethical concern for just treatment, built on what one is willing to accept as properly a empathy or altruism in human behavior and human right. Such precepts are typically concepts of justice in philosophy. The invoked in the debates over current issues philosopher and economist, Amartya Sen, such as abortion, same-sex marriage, the considers that “Human rights can be seen as death penalty, migration, much as they were primarily ethical demands… Like other around slavery and inequality based on ethical claims that demand acceptance, there class, gender or ethnicity in the past. is an implicit presumption in making Enlightenment philosophers derived the pronouncements on human rights that the centrality of the individual from their underlying ethical claims will survive open theories of the state of nature. Social 1 and informed scrutiny.” In moral contractarians, especially Jean-Jacques reasoning, the expression “human rights” is Rousseau, predicated the authority of the often not distinguished from the more state on its capacity to achieve the optimum general concept of “rights,” although in law enjoyment of natural rights, that is, of rights a “right” refers to any entitlement protected inherent in each individual irrespective of by law, the moral validity or legitimacy of birth or status. He wrote in Essay on the which may be separate from its legal status Origin on Inequality Among Men that “it is as an entitlement. The moral basis of a right plainly contrary to the law of nature…that the privileged few should gorge themselves 1 Amartya Sen, “Elements of a Theory of Human with superfluities, while the starving Rights,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 32, No. 4 multitude are in want of the bare necessities (2004), p. 320. © Harvard University 2016 Marks 3 Human Rights of life.”2 Equally important was the concept an constitutive characteristic of human of the universalized individual (“the rights rights”3, implying an inherent value of the of Man”), reflected in the political thinking concept of human rights, independent of of Immanuel Kant, John Locke, Thomas what is established in law. Legal positivists Paine and the authors of the American would disagree and consider law to be Declaration of Independence (1776) and the constitutive rather than declarative of human French Declaration of the Rights of Man and rights. the Citizen (1789). The Enlightenment represents for the West both the affirmation B. Human rights as legal rights (positive of the scientific method with the related law tradition) faith of human progress and the formulation of the human rights, which define the “Legal positivists” regard human rights freedom and equality on which the as resulting from a formal norm-creating legitimacy of modern governments have process, by which we mean an authoritative henceforth been judged. Karl Marx and formulation of the rules by which a society much of socialist thinking questioned the (national or international) is governed. “bourgeois” character of a limited While “natural rights” derive from natural interpretation of individual human rights and order or divine origin, and are inalienable, stressed community interests and egalitarian immutable, and absolute, rights based on values. “positive law” are recognized through a political and legal process that results in a The ethical basis of human rights has declaration, law, treaty, or other normative been defined using concepts such as human instrument. These may vary over time and flourishing, dignity, duties to family and be subject to derogations or limitations society, natural rights, individual freedom, designed to optimize