DOCSLIB.ORG

On Your Bike: the Best and the Worst of City Cycle Schemes | Money | the Guardian 27/08/2018, 1520

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On Your Bike: the Best and the Worst of City Cycle Schemes | Money | the Guardian 27/08/2018, 15�20 On your bike: the best and the worst of city cycle schemes | Money | The Guardian 27/08/2018, 1520 On your bike: the best and the worst of city cycle schemes Patrick Collinson Sat 25 Feb 2017 07.00 GMT The wheel deal: China’s cycle schemes, such as Mobike, are proving hugely popular. Photograph: Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty Images As bike(sharing in London hits a record high, we explore schemes across the globe his year is the 10th anniversary of the world’s first large-scale bike-sharing scheme, the Velib in Paris, whose immediate success – 20 million users in its first year – prompted cities across the world to wheel out their own copies. A decade later there are 1,000 of these schemes, from Milton Keynes to the medina in Marrakech, with 17 across the UK and more opening this year. T Some have back-pedalled: Seattle will shut its Pronto scheme in March, a victim of hills, rain, budget cuts and the city’s mandatory helmet law, while in Spain cash-strapped local authorities have put the brakes on half of the country’s 130 schemes. And just as city dwellers have got used to the sight of rows of docking stations – often jammed-full or empty – the Chinese are promising a ride- anywhere, anytime Uber-style revolution that will make docking stations a thing of the past – and possibly kick-start an explosion of bike usage. Beijing entrepreneur Dai Wei, just 25, is already flooding Shanghai and Singapore with his trademark Ofo yellow bicycles, where users tap an app to find a bike, jump on it, then leave it where they like. No more are users tied to finding a docking station and hoping a bike is available – and, crucially, that there is a docking space at their destination. What’s more, the Chinese have very deep pockets. Ofo is backed by the multibillion-dollar company that has edged Uber out of China – and claims to already have five million registered users in 24 cities – while rival Mobike has just raised $215m from tech giant Tencent and others. Both companies are now pouring money into a battle for global dominance, telling cities they can fund bike-sharing schemes without any public subsidy with a pricing model that charges as little as 10p a use and with no annual charge. Some cities may even be given money to host a scheme, in a complete upending of the subsidy-driven model that has so far been in use. Compare that to London where, despite Santander’s £44m seven-year sponsorship deal, London taxpayers have to cover £10m of its £25m annual operating costs. Cambridge, already Britain’s most cycle-friendly city (it helps that it’s very flat) will be the first to see Ofo bikes in Europe, with the company expected to roll out 500 bikes towards the end of next month. Users will be asked to download an app, which will then locate the closest available bike. The user keys in a four-digit code sent by the app, and they are then free to wheel it away. At their destination they need to find somewhere legal to leave it, flip the kickstand and just walk away. What’s more, there is no time limit and the cost is reported to be just 50p a ride. In more advanced station-less bikes, GPS devices prevent them from going outside designated city areas, using what is called “geo-fencing” technology. It’s no coincidence that Ofo has picked Cambridge. The company currently operates in 200 universities across China, including Beijing. It also enables registered users to share their own bikes in exchange for the unlimited use of any Ofo one. It said it has picked Cambridge because it sees it as the UK’s “city of cycling” with an “open and diversified environment”. file:///Users/andrew/Dropbox/Files/170225-Dublinbikes%20review%20in%20the%20Guardian%20by%20Patrick%20Collinson.webarchive Page 1 of 5 On your bike: the best and the worst of city cycle schemes | Money | The Guardian 27/08/2018, 1521 But will station-less, ride-anywhere schemes result in city-wide anarchy, with hundreds of bikes piling up at train stations in the evening, carelessly blocking doors and pedestrians, or lying vandalised down alleys or chucked in canals? Antonia Roberts of Bike Plus, an umbrella group for Britain’s bike-sharing schemes, says she has seen plenty of photos of bike carnage near Chinese railway hubs. “These schemes are very controversial. There is a lot of investment from Chinese operators moving into the UK, and the finance coming into them is huge. “They are the Uber of bikes. But there is not enough control or redistribution. You end up with huge pile-ups in stations, and they become a terrible eyesore. They are actively targeting the UK, with Ofo in Cambridge and Mobike thought to be looking at London, Manchester and Birmingham. They are saying that you don’t need any public money at all. It’s a game changer.” In Cambridge, Al Storer of the Cambridge Cycling Campaign, (camcycle.org.uk) is unconvinced about Ofo’s approach. “From what I’ve seen of the bike spec, there is no way of locking them to anything – you can only lock the rear wheel. And there don’t appear to be any lights, which would limit their legal use. We definitely have concerns about it. There is a lot of pressure over space for parking bikes in Cambridge as it is.” The best schemes In the Netherlands 27% of all trips are already made by bike. Photograph: Tony Burns/Getty Images/Lonely Planet Image This is probably a toss-up between Hangzhou in China and Dublin in Ireland, although Vienna’s and Washington DC’s schemes win plaudits, while the Netherlands wins on transport integration. Hangzhou wins on sheer scale. The city has a population of 9 million – just a bit bigger than London – but has 78,000 bikes compared to London’s 11,500, with plans to expand the network to 175,000. In terms of “fleet size”, 17 of the world’s top 20 schemes are in China (Paris, London and Barcelona squeeze in towards the bottom). What makes these schemes hugely successful is not just density of bikes but also price: in most Chinese cities users make a refundable deposit, after that bike usage is free for half an hour. Dublin wins on intensity of use. Its 1,500 bikes were used 4.4m times in 2016, about four times as much as in London where the 11,500 bikes were used 10.3m times last year. Geographer and bike data mapper Oliver O’Brien, a researcher at UCL, says that while London is dominated by a “single pulse” of usage (getting into work and then leaving to go home), Dublin appears to have a second pulse, with heavy lunchtime usage. It also helps that its scheme is one of the cheapest in the western world with an annual fee of just €25 (£21) compared to London’s £90. But it is to the Netherlands, a country where 27% of all trips are already made by bike (it’s 1% in the US), that we must look for the most nationally integrated bike-sharing scheme. OV-fiets runs out of almost all important train stations (with 300 locations across the country), with commuters able to pick up a bike from automatic dispensers or from a staffed rental location. The idea is that while the Dutch use their bikes to cycle to a station, when they reach their destination they can hop on another for the last half-mile or so. The system is integrated into the national OV-chipkaart, which is much like the Oyster card in London. Costs compared Step aside London. It was once the highest-priced bike-sharing scheme in the world (by annual membership). But that dubious honour now goes to New York which, despite sponsorship from Citibank (and the fact it calls itself “an affordable way to get around town”) charges $163 (£131) for annual membership, and $12 (£9.60) for a day pass. New York’s scheme is, however, entirely privately funded, and indicates what London might have to charge without its public subsidy. file:///Users/andrew/Dropbox/Files/170225-Dublinbikes%20review%20in%20the%20Guardian%20by%20Patrick%20Collinson.webarchive Page 2 of 5 On your bike: the best and the worst of city cycle schemes | Money | The Guardian 27/08/2018, 1521 Apart from the Chinese cities, where costs are as little as 10p a ride (and some are effectively free), the best-value city schemes are those in Dublin and Madrid, both at just €25 a year (£21). Most big European cities charge between a third and a half of the rate charged by London. However, for occasional users and tourists the daily charge varies markedly. San Francisco and Copenhagen are very expensive, while Barcelona is a bargain at 62p. Except that the latter goes out of its way to make sure its scheme is for locals only, not visitors. Most British schemes are at the top end of European pricing, though there are plans to introduce monthly passes to ease the financial pain. Sebastian Schlebusch of Germany’s Nextbike, which runs bike-sharing schemes in Glasgow, Milton Keynes, Bath and Stirling, says it plans to introduce a monthly pass for £7-£8 which will be usable across any of its city schemes. Meanwhile, Brighton, which launches its 430-bike scheme in June, is pioneering a pay-per-minute approach, charging 3p for each minute of use, though it will also offer a more traditional fare structure of £2 per trip or £8 per day, with an annual pass for £72.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investing in the Future of Public Transport
    Investing in the Future of Public Transport November 2020 Our Vision NTA’s vision is to provide high quality, accessible, sustainable transport connecting people across Ireland. Our focus is on ensuring that public transport services and infrastructure are designed and implemented to give the best possible experiences for the travelling public, and to provide value for the State’s investment. That is at the core of everything we do. NTA projects identified under the National Development Plan 2018- 2027 include: • Continued investment in bus and train fleets, and public transport infrastructure. BUS TRAIN • Delivery of the full BusConnects programme for all of Ireland’s cities (inclusive of ticketing systems, bus corridors, additional capacity, new bus stops and bus shelters etc.) SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT FOR A BETTER CITY. • Transition to low emission buses, including electric buses, for the urban public bus fleet. • Complete construction of MetroLink. • Delivery of the priority elements of DART+ including investment in new train fleet, new infrastructure and electrification of existing lines. • Strategic park-and-ride sites plus investment in parking facilities at rail, P+R Luas and bus locations. • Delivery of comprehensive cycling and walking network for Ireland’s cities. BIKE WALKING • Supporting programmes of rail and bus station improvement/development, traffic management investment, passenger information programmes, public bicycle share schemes, and accessibility enhancements. TRAM BUS BIKE • Undertake appraisal, planning and design of Luas network expansion to Bray, Finglas, Lucan, Poolbeg and a light rail corridor for Cork. Subsidising vital public transport services The vast majority of all public transport journeys are made on Public Service Obligation (PSO) services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Contribution of Public Bike-Share to the Sustainability
    Sustainable Cities and Society 28 (2017) 76–87 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Sustainable Cities and Society journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scs The economic contribution of public bike-share to the sustainability and efficient functioning of cities a,∗ a b Craig Bullock (Dr) , Finbarr Brereton (Dr) , Sive Bailey (Ms) a School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy and Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin DO4 V1W8, Ireland b School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin DO4 V1W8, Ireland a r a t i b s c t l e i n f o r a c t Article history: An expanding literature has explored the benefits of public bike-share schemes from various perspec- Received 20 April 2016 tives, including user characteristics, journey time savings, convenience, health benefits and reductions in Received in revised form 21 August 2016 motor vehicle use. However, rather few papers have examined bike-share schemes in economic terms. In Accepted 25 August 2016 this paper we place these benefits in an economic context of private individual benefits and public good Available online 31 August 2016 benefits. Using data from a survey of bike-share users in Dublin, Ireland, we critically examine the relative value of these benefits and their impact on the spatial functioning of cities. We demonstrate that, for this Keywords: particular scheme, the benefits associated with time savings far exceed the benefits that are commonly Bike-share claimed for modal transfer. We go on to describe how, by delivering time savings and improving spa- Cost-benefit analysis tial connectivity, bike-share schemes reduce effective density and supply both conventional and wider Wider economic benefits Agglomeration benefits economic benefits for the urban economy that are commensurate with investment in public transport schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Ireland – Some Notes for Interns
    Welcome to Ireland – General Notes for Interns (2015 – will be updated for 2016 in January 2016) Fergus Ryan These notes are designed to introduce you to Ireland and to address any questions you might have concerning practical aspects about your visit to Ireland. About Ireland Ireland is an island on the north- financial services. The official west coast of Europe, with a languages are English and Irish. population of approximately 6.3 While English is the main language million inhabitants. It is of communication, Irish is spoken on approximately 32,600 square miles, a daily basis in some parts of the 300 miles from the northern most west, while over half a million tip to the most southern, and inhabitants speak a language other approximately 175 miles across, than English or Irish at home. making it just a little under half the (Sources: CSO Census 2011, size of Oklahoma State. www.cso.ie) Politically, the island comprises two Northern Ireland comprises six legal entities. The Republic of counties in the northeast corner of Ireland, with 4.6 million the island. A jurisdiction within the inhabitants, makes up the bulk of the United Kingdom, it has just over 1.8 island. The State attained million people. It has its own power- independence from the UK in 1922, sharing parliament and government and became a Republic in 1949. The with significant devolved powers Republic of Ireland is a sovereign, and functions. Its capital and largest democratic republic, with its current city is Belfast. Northern Ireland is Constitution dating back to 1937. It politically divided along religious is a member of the European Union lines: 48% of those in Northern and the Council of Europe, but is Ireland are Protestant or were militarily non-aligned.
    [Show full text]
  • International Visitors Guide University College Dublin
    International Visitors Guide University College Dublin 1 International Visitors Guide Table of Contents Orientation ..................................................................................... 3 Practical Information ..................................................................... 4 Visas ............................................................................................. 4 Language ..................................................................................... 5 Weather ....................................................................................... 5 Currrency ..................................................................................... 5 Tipping (Gratuity) .......................................................................... 5 Emergencies ................................................................................. 5 Transport in Dublin ........................................................................ 6 Transport Apps .............................................................................. 6 Additional Information about UCD .................................................... 6 Arriving in Dublin ........................................................................... 7 Arriving by Plane ............................................................................ 7 Arriving by Train ............................................................................ 7 Traveling to UCD ............................................................................. 8 By Aircoach...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bicycle Schemes
    Division 44 Water, Energy and Transport Recommended Reading and Links on Public Bicycle Schemes September 2010 Reading List on Public Bicycle Schemes Preface Various cities around the world are trying methods to encourage bicycling as a sustainable transport mode. Among those methods in encouraging cycling implementing public bicycle schemes is one. The public bicycle schemes are also known as bicycle sharing systems, community bicycling schemes etc., The main idea of a public bicycle system is that the user need not own a bicycle but still gain the advantages of bicycling by renting a bicycle provided by the scheme for a nominal fee or for free of charge (as in some cities). Most of these schemes enable people to realize one way trips, because the users needn’t to return the bicycles to the origin, which will avoid unnecessary travel. Public bicycle schemes provide not only convenience for trips in the communities, they can also be a good addition to the public transport system. Encouraging public bike systems have shown that there can be numerous short that could be made by a bicycle instead of using motorised modes. Public bike schemes also encourage creative designs in bikes and also in the operational mechanisms. The current document is one of the several efforts of GTZ-Sustainable Urban Transport Project to bring to the policymakers an easy to access list of available material on Public Bike Schemes (PBS) which can be used in their everyday work. The document aims to list out some influential and informative resources that highlight the importance of PBS in cities and how the existing situation could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland's Environment – An
    Chapter 11 Environment and Transport Chapter 11: Environment and Transport 281 Environment and Transport 1. Introduction 2. Environmental Transport systems provide connectivity for delivering the Pressures from Transport goods, services, amenities and employment that underpin human wellbeing. A sustainable, accessible and efficient Energy Consumption transport system is not only important for welfare but Transport is the largest energy-consuming sector has a key function in trade and the economy. It also in Ireland, with a 42 per cent share of final facilitates tourism and is an employer and source of consumption, most of which is imported oil. government revenue in itself. Yet transport is also a major Consumption of energy has been strongly driven by consumer of energy and material resources, and a key economic and population growth, but also by decades source of environmental pressures in Ireland, particularly of public and private choices that affect the transport of greenhouse gases, air pollutants and noise. It takes up system. Figure 11.1 shows that growth in energy large swathes of land and contributes to urban sprawl, the consumption exceeded that of the economy until 2007. fragmentation of habitats and the sealing of surfaces (EEA, This was followed by continual declines until 2012, and 2019a). Reducing the impact of transport systems is one of a resumption as the economy recovered. Consumption the biggest challenges to delivering a sustainable and low- in 2018 was 25 per cent higher than in 2012, having carbon economy and society. The European Environment increased every year since then. Aviation alone grew Agency (EEA), in its state of the environment report 2020, by 7.9 per cent in 2018, accounting for 21 per cent of highlighted transport and mobility systems as particularly energy used for transport, second only to private cars, damaging to the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Dubliners – a Full Day's Epic. We Do Not Call This Tour Is Not
    Welcome to Dubliners – A Full Day’s Epic. We do not call this tour is not called an epic lightly. In fact it’s a great challenge! Joyce was a great walker and mapper in his youth, when he spent hours roaming across his city, and as he roamed, so does his Dubliners – and in the case of this ‘Epic’ for 9-10 hours across his city. A few important things to note about your map When there is a track to listen to the route arrow will be purple, when there is nothing to listen to the route arrow will be red. All track numbers are colour coded to their story colour on the map. Please do be sure to read the important accompanying instructions and background to each track, before pressing play. The playing time for each track is written after its verbal description at the bottom of the map. This is not the time it takes to walk to the next location. You will also see the track counting down as it plays in the top left hand corner of your screen. You have ten detailed step by step maps and one overview map in your folder. Tips on how your Mp3 player works You will be shown how to use the player before you leave. However these are some things to remember along the way: There is a blank 1 minute after nearly every track – this is to let you know that that track it is over and it’s time to walk to the next location.
    [Show full text]
  • First/ Last Mile International Best Practice Review
    First/ Last Mile International Best Practice Review A technical report produced by WSP and Steer for the EEH evidence base CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PROJECT CONTEXT & VISION 1 1.2 REPORT PURPOSE 2 2 FIRST MILE LAST MILE SEGMENTATION 3 2.1 MODE SEGMENTATION 3 3 MODE DASHBOARDS 6 3.1 BACKGROUND 6 3.2 MODE ATTRIBUTES 6 4 AGGREGATION OF FM/LM MODES 97 4.1 AGGREGATION 97 4.2 BEST PRACTICE 97 4.3 APPLICABILITY TO EEH 102 5 BEHAVIOUR CHANGE 103 5.1 INTRODUCTION 103 5.2 BACKGROUND 103 5.3 THE ROLE OF SEGMENTATION IN BEHAVIOUR CHANGE 104 5.4 FIRST MILE LAST MILE BEHAVIOUR CHANGE INTERVENTIONS 111 6 DELIVERING FM/LM CONNECTIVITY 122 6.1 POLICY 122 6.2 LEGISLATION AND REGULATION 122 6.3 DELIVERING FMLM MODES 125 7 CONCLUSION 127 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT CONTEXT & VISION England’s Economic Heartland (EEH) has acknowledged that its ambition to significantly grow the economy across the Heartland, deliver ‘clean growth’ and pursue a net zero-carbon transport network will not be achieved through a ‘business as usual’ approach. A high quality, tailored, multimodal mobility eco-system, which includes the provision of sustainable first-mile / last-mile (FMLM) choices, integrating with long distance modes linking key centres, will be a key catalyst for the change required to maintain the region as a global competitor. ‘First-mile last-mile’ is typically used to describe the beginning or end of an individual journey to or from a transportation hub or service. Within the Heartland the definition of first-mile last-mile represents a wider choice of both traditional and emerging transport modes that enable access to opportunities and needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Bikesharing
    Worldwide Bikesharing SUSANSHAHEENANDSTACEYGUZMAN ikesharing has evolved greatly since the first program was launched in the Netherlands in the mid-1960s. As of May 2011, there were an estimated B136 bikesharing programs in 165 cities around the world, with 237,000 bikes on the streets. In the Americas, bikesharing activity has spread to Canada, Mexico, the US, Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. Asia, which represents the fastest-growing bikesharing market today, has programs in China, South Korea, and Taiwan. Susan Shaheen is Co-Director of the Transportation Sustainability Research Center (TSRC), and Lecturer in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley ([email protected]).Stacey Guzman is Research Assistant at the Transportation Sustainability Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley ([email protected]). ACCESS 22 BIKESHARING HISTORY Bikesharing has passed through three distinct generations. First-generation bike- TABLE 1 sharing, or White Bikes, began in Amsterdam in 1965. Fifty bicycles were painted white, Worldwide Bikesharing Programs left permanently unlocked, and placed throughout the inner city for the public to use freely. Providing the bicycle was the main component in this free bike system. Because users often stole or damaged the bikes, this initiative failed soon after its launch. Despite COUNTRY PROGRAMS BICYCLES STATIONS Amsterdam’s disappointing experience, the bikesharing concept caught on. Problems with first-generation bikesharing led Copenhagen to launch an improved Argentina 1 560 15 bikesharing model in 1995. This led to the second bikesharing generation, known as Australia 2 2,600 200 coin-deposit systems. The main components of this generation are: 1) bicycles distin- Austria 3 1,500 82 guished by color and special design; 2) designated docking stations in which bikes can be Belgium 1 2,500 180 locked, borrowed, and returned; and 3) small deposits to unlock bikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Living in Dublin
    Living in Dublin in Ireland Contents Getting Started ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Applying for a PPS Number ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Opening a Bank Account .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Choosing a Local Mobile Phone Provider ................................................................................................................................. 3 Accommodation ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Utilities ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Dublin’s Postal Districts .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Rights and Obligations as a tenant in private rented accommodation .............................................................................. 6 Travel ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bicycle-Sharing in the City: Analysis of the Irish Experience
    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The role of bicycle-sharing in the city: analysis of the Irish experience Enda Murphy1, Joe Usher1 1University College Dublin, School of Geography, Planning & Environmental Policy, Planning Building, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Corresponding author: Enda Murphy, , . E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Bicycle-sharing schemes have become an important piece of infrastructure in many cities across the world over the last decade. However, existing research investigating the role and impact of these schemes in cities is sparse. This research analyses the impact of a recently implemented scheme in Dublin, Ireland. Using evidence from 360 questionnaires, the paper examines four associated with the scheme: (1) the socio-economic characteristics of the users; (2) its impact on modal choice; (3) its peak and off-peak functionality; and (4) its impact on driver awareness of cyclists. Results show the scheme is used predominantly by higher-income individuals, it has a different functionality during the peak and off-peak and has been indirectly successful at improving driver awareness towards cyclists. INTRODUCTION Downloaded by [University College Dublin], [Enda Murphy] at 05:35 25 July 2013 The role of cycling in the city transportation system has gained increasing attention in recent years due, at least in part, to its rise in popularity as an alternative mode of transport in many European cities. This rise in popularity is related to numerous factors in individual countries some of which are policy-related while others are related to changing cultural and socio-economic contexts (see DeMaio, 2009; Midgley, 2011). There is little ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT doubt though that it is due, at least in part, to the fact that awareness of the bicycle as an environmentally-friendly and healthy alternative to motorised transportation has been raised.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciaran Cuffe
    Green Party : Comhaontas Glas Metrolink Submission Councillor Ciarán Cuffe Councillor Ciarán Cuffe Green Party : Comhaontas Glas North Inner City Ward 50 Montpelier Hill, Stoneybatter D07 F8H2 Cuirim Fáilte Roimh Ghaeilge - Irish Welcome @CiaranCuffe www.CiaranCuffe.ie Oifigeach Poiblí Ainmnithe faoin Acht um Brústocaireacht a Rialáil 2015 Designated Public Official under the Regulation of Lobbying Act 2015 11th May 2018 Head of Consultations MetroLink Consultations [email protected] Transport Infrastructure Ireland, Parkgate Business Centre, Parkgate Street, Dublin 8, D08 DK10 Re. Metrolink Non-statutory Public consultation. Madam, Sir, I welcome the proposals to improve public transport in Greater Dublin with the construction of Metrolink; however I ask that you take on board the following concerns. 1. At the northern terminus, Metrolink should be extended north of Lissen Hall to include a station beside at Donabate railway station. 2. The implications of the Griffith Park stop and associated works off Mobhí Road have severe negative implications for Na Fianna Cumann Lúthchleas Gael Scoil Mobhí, Scoil Chaitríona, Tír na nÓg (preschool) and related facilities and grounds. It is recommended that consideration is given to alternative locations to the north or west. This may have implications for the positioning of the Collins Avenue and Ballymun stops which may need to be located slightly further north. 3. Crossguns Station and other stations should provide for seamless integration with existing and proposed walking and cycling facilities. The lesson from Luas Cross-City is that walking and cycling were not considered in an integrated fashion. With Metrolink there is the opportunity to make a new beginning on integration.
    [Show full text]