Steckbrief Gebiet Tscheljabinsk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

www.thueringen-international.de Steckbrief Gebiet Tscheljabinsk Wirtschaft des Gebiets Tscheljabinsk Die industrielle Entwicklung der Region wird durch Metallurgie, Maschinenbau, Brennstoff und Energie, Bauwesen und Agroindustrie bestimmt. Mehr als 90.000 Unternehmen und Organisationen aller Eigentumsformen sind registriert. Das verarbeitende Gewerbe (Metallurgie, Maschinenbau) ist der Grundsektor der Wirtschaft, der die wirtschaftliche Spezialisierung der Region Tscheljabinsk bestimmt. Zum 1. Dezember 2020 betrug der Produktionsindex für die Haupttätigkeitsarten für das gesamte Spektrum der Fertigungsunternehmen 98,2 % gegenüber dem gleichen Zeitraum im Jahr 2019. In der Struktur der Industrieproduktion liegt das größte spezifische Gewicht in der verarbeitenden Industrie, deren Produktionsindex 96,5% betrug. Der Produktionsindex bei der Gewinnung von Mineralien betrug 125,6% bei der Bereitstellung von Strom, Gas und Dampf, Klimaanlage - 87,6% bei der Wasserversorgung; Abwasserentsorgung, Abfallsammlung und - entsorgung, Maßnahmen zur Beseitigung der Umweltverschmutzung - 106,6%. Die Eisenmetallurgie, in deren Größenordnung die Region im Land ihresgleichen sucht, wird von einigen der größten metallurgischen Anlagen (Magnitogorsk, Tscheljabinsk), Verarbeitungsbetrieben (Zlatoust), Unternehmen zur Herstellung von Ferrolegierungen und Stahlrohren (Tscheljabinsk) vertreten. In der Nichteisenmetallurgie werden Kupfer (Karabasch, Kyshtym), Zink (Tscheljabinsk) und Nickel (Verkhniy Ufaley) hergestellt. Die Metallurgie wird von der Herstellung von Magnesit-Feuerfestmaterialien (Satka) begleitet. Der Maschinenbau stützt sich auf eine eigene metallurgische Basis, die den Metallverbrauch bestimmt. Es produziert Traktoren (Tscheljabinsk), Lastwagen (Miass), Straßenbahnwagen (Ust-Katav), technologische Ausrüstung, Raketen- und Weltraumtechnologie (Miass) und elektrische Produkte. Die Energiebasis der Region umfasst den Braunkohlebergbau (Kopeysk) und mehrere leistungsstarke Wärmekraftwerke (Troitskaya und Yuzhno-Uralskaya GRES usw.). Mit einer deutlichen Dominanz der Industrie verfügt die Region über eine entwickelte Landwirtschaft, insbesondere in der Verteilungszone von Schwarzerdeböden. Die größten Industrieunternehmen und Werke der Region Tscheljabinsk Eisenmetallurgie: Magnitogorsk Eisen- und Stahlwerk (MMK), Metallurgisches Werk Tscheljabinsk (CHMK), Zlatoust Metallurgical Plant (ZMZ), Ashinskiy Metallurgical Plant (AMZ), Tscheljabinsker Rohrwalzanlage (ChTPZ), Magnitogorsk Hardware und Metallurgisches Werk (MMMZ), Magnitogorsk Calibration Plant (MKZ), Elektrometallurgisches Werk Tscheljabinsk (CHEMK) Nichteisenmetallurgie: Kyshtym Copper Electrolyte Plant, CJSC, Tscheljabinsker Zinkfabrik, Karabashmed, JSC Maschinenbau: Tscheljabinsker Traktoranlage Uraltrak OJSC, Ural Automobile Plant JSC, Tscheljabinsk Straßenbaumaschinen OJSC, Teplopribor JSC, Mechanisches Werk Tscheljabinsk (CHMZ), Tscheljabinsker Kompressorwerk (ChKZ), Tscheljabinsker Instrumentenwerk (CHIZ), Tscheljabinsker Pressschmiede (CHKPZ), Maschinenbauwerk Zlatoust (ZMZ), Kopeisk Machine-Building Plant (KMZ), Stahlkonstruktionswerk Tscheljabinsk (CHZMK) .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Systemic Criteria for the Evaluation of the Role of Monofunctional Towns in the Formation of Local Urban Agglomerations
ISSN 2007-9737 Systemic Criteria for the Evaluation of the Role of Monofunctional Towns in the Formation of Local Urban Agglomerations Pavel P. Makagonov1, Lyudmila V. Tokun2, Liliana Chanona Hernández3, Edith Adriana Jiménez Contreras4 1 Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Russia 2 State University of Management, Finance and Credit Department, Russia 3 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Mexico 4 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Cómputo, Mexico [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. There exist various federal and regional monotowns do not possess any distinguishing self- programs aimed at solving the problem of organization peculiarities in comparison to other monofunctional towns in the periods of economic small towns. stagnation and structural unemployment occurrence. Nevertheless, people living in such towns can find Keywords. Systemic analysis, labor migration, labor solutions to the existing problems with the help of self- market, agglomeration process criterion, self- organization including diurnal labor commuting migration organization of monotown population. to the nearest towns with a more stable economic situation. This accounts for the initial reason for agglomeration processes in regions with a large number 1 Introduction of monotowns. Experimental models of the rank distribution of towns in a system (region) and evolution In this paper, we discuss the problems of criteria of such systems from basic ones to agglomerations are explored in order to assess the monotown population using as an example several intensity of agglomeration processes in the systems of monotowns located in Siberia (Russia). In 2014 the towns in the Middle and Southern Urals (the Sverdlovsk Government of the Russian Federation issued two and Chelyabinsk regions of Russia).
[Show full text]
Nuclear Status Report Additional Nonproliferation Resources
NUCLEAR NUCLEAR WEAPONS, FISSILE MATERIAL, AND STATUS EXPORT CONTROLS IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION REPORT NUMBER 6 JUNE 2001 RUSSIA BELARUS RUSSIA UKRAINE KAZAKHSTAN JON BROOK WOLFSTHAL, CRISTINA-ASTRID CHUEN, EMILY EWELL DAUGHTRY EDITORS NUCLEAR STATUS REPORT ADDITIONAL NONPROLIFERATION RESOURCES From the Non-Proliferation Project Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Russia’s Nuclear and Missile Complex: The Human Factor in Proliferation Valentin Tikhonov Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction with Routledge Joseph Cirincione, editor The Next Wave: Urgently Needed Steps to Control Warheads and Fissile Materials with Harvard University’s Project on Managing the Atom Matthew Bunn The Rise and Fall of START II: The Russian View Alexander A. Pikayev From the Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies The Chemical Weapons Convention: Implementation Challenges and Solutions Jonathan Tucker, editor International Perspectives on Ballistic Missile Proliferation and Defenses Scott Parish, editor Tactical Nuclear Weapons: Options for Control UN Institute for Disarmament Research William Potter, Nikolai Sokov, Harald Müller, and Annette Schaper Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes Updated by Tariq Rauf, Mary Beth Nikitin, and Jenni Rissanen Russian Strategic Modernization: Past and Future Rowman & Littlefield Nikolai Sokov NUCLEAR NUCLEAR WEAPONS, FISSILE MATERIAL, AND STATUS EXPORT CONTROLS IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION REPORT NUMBER 6 JUNE
[Show full text]
Great Siberian Highway and Process Urbanization on Southern Ural (1891-1914 Years)
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Siberian Federal University Digital Repository Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 2 (2009 2) 176-183 ~ ~ ~ УДК 908 Great Siberian Highway and Process Urbanization on Southern Ural (1891-1914 Years) Aleksandr A. Timofeev* South-Ural state university, 76 Lenin av., Chelyabinsk, 454080 Russia 1 Received 23.03.2009, received in revised form 30.03.2009, accepted 6.04.2009 There are considered urban population’s processes occurring on Southern Ural after construction of the Transsiberian railway (Transsib) at the end of XIX – the beginning of XX centuries in clause. The reasons of strengthening of the urbanization process , the increase of the urban population’s share on Southern Ural were growth of industry and trade, requirement for a cheap labour. Ufa, Zlatoust, Chelyabinsk cities, located along the Transsiberian railway, become the large railway stations. Keywords: Transsiberian railway, Southern Ural, urbanization, modernization. The considered period of 1891-1914 it is communication networks in the urbanized possible to characterize as an initial stage the territories. Modernization, «industrialization, urbanization’s transition of the Southern-Ural urbanization frequently proceed in interrelation». region. The essence of a urbanization consists In conditions of modernization of the end XIX – in territorial concentration of the human the beginnings XX centuries cities concentrated activity, conducting to the intensification and in themselves economic, administrative, differentiations down to allocation of new scientific, spiritual potential of all society. The city forms and spatial structures of population economic maintenance of modernization consists moving. Urban transition is qualitatively in development industrial, transport, trading, allocated, supreme stage of the urbanization’s financial-bank systems and other kinds of not process, which conducts to radical transformation agricultural branches.
[Show full text]
Russia Missile Chronology
Russia Missile Chronology 2007-2000 NPO MASHINOSTROYENIYA | KBM | MAKEYEV DESIGN BUREAU | MITT | ZLATOUST MACHINE-BUILDING PLANT KHRUNICHEV | STRELA PRODUCTION ASSOCIATION | AAK PROGRESS | DMZ | NOVATOR | TsSKB-PROGRESS MKB RADUGA | ENERGOMASH | ISAYEV KB KHIMMASH | PLESETSK TEST SITE | SVOBODNYY COSMODROME 1999-1996 KRASNOYARSK MACHINE-BUILDING PLANT | MAKEYEV DESIGN BUREAU | MITT | AAK PROGRESS NOVATOR | SVOBODNYY COSMODROME Last update: March 2009 This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation 2007-2000: NPO MASHINOSTROYENIYA 28 August 2007 NPO MASHINOSTROYENIYA TO FORM CORPORATION NPO Mashinostroyeniya is set to form a vertically-integrated corporation, combining producers and designers of various supply and support elements. The new holding will absorb OAO Strela Production Association (PO Strela), OAO Permsky Zavod Mashinostroitel, OAO NPO Elektromekhaniki, OAO NII Elektromekhaniki, OAO Avangard, OAO Uralskiy NII Kompositsionnykh Materialov, and OAO Kontsern Granit-Elektron. While these entities have acted in coordination for some time, formation of the new corporation has yet to be finalized.
[Show full text]
Guide to Investment Chelyabinsk Region Pwc Russia ( Provides Industry-Focused Assurance, Advisory, Tax and Legal Services
Guide to Investment Chelyabinsk Region PwC Russia (www.pwc.ru) provides industry-focused assurance, advisory, tax and legal services. Over 2,500 professionals working in PwC offices in Moscow, St Petersburg, Ekaterinburg, Kazan, Novosibirsk, Krasnodar, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk and Vladikavkaz share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop fresh perspectives and practical advice for our clients. Global PwC network includes over 169,000 employees in 158 countries. PwC first appeared in Russia in 1913 and re-established its presence here in 1989. Since then, PwC has been a leader in providing professional services in Russia. According to the annual rating published in Expert magazine, PwC is the largest audit and consulting firm in Russia (see Expert, 2000-2011). This overview has been prepared in conjunction with and based on the materials provided by the Ministry of Economic Development of Chelyabinsk Region. This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC network, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information
[Show full text]
The Diary of Anatoly S. Chernyaev 1980
The Diary of Anatoly S. Chernyaev 1980 Donated by A.S. Chernyaev to The National Security Archive Translated by Anna Melyakova http://www.nsarchive.org The Diary of Anatoly S. Chernyaev, 1980 http://www.nsarchive.org 1980 January 1, 1980 The year was crazy. It was hectic at work. It exposed a great deal about the overall situation (in the sense that things are getting worse both domestically and internationally). In all respects it fell short of expectations. Judging by what I see around me and things I hear, people were bidding a gloomy farewell to the year that passed, and saying a gloomy hello to the new year. Stores are empty and over the last few days even stamps and envelopes have disappeared: I personally witnessed a scene at the Central Telegraph on this matter – “sabotage,” “inadequacy,” “whoever allowed this to happen should have his head taken off” and so forth. January 28, 1980 I haven’t written for a month. And what a month! It’s like at the front: when you are in battle, you don’t have time to write. And after the battle, you don’t want to write about it, you want to write about something “lofty,” about Moscow… The devil knows what is happening in the world. The whole world condemned and cursed us: in the UN – 104 delegations voted against us and only 17 with us. Hypocrisy? Yes, of course. But we threw a good litmus test – and hatred (or, at best, dislike) towards us came to the surface everywhere. We were condemned by governments and parliaments, all kinds of committees and individual politicians, parties and trade unions.
[Show full text]
Monuments of the World Cultural Heritage in Russia - Challenges and Perspectives» and Annual Conference of the National Committee ICOMOS, Russia
II International Scientific Symposium «Monuments of the World Cultural Heritage in Russia - challenges and perspectives» and Annual Conference of the National Committee ICOMOS, Russia ABSTRACTS 19-21 September 2018 Veliky Novgorod Putting a Stop to Losses, Managing the Present and the Future of the Cultural Heritage of Russia The bitter news of the fire that destroyed the wooden tent-roofed Church of the Assumption in Kondopoga, the Republic of Karelia has shocked all of us. It was a symbol of the spiritual and material power of the Russian people, a cultural monument of federal significance, an object of worship for thousands of people. Its beauty and sophistication, its unique image celebrated by poets and artists were fascinating. Numerous monographs both in Russia and abroad have been dedicated to it, for centuries it was passing down the generations the inimitable charm of the Russian North. This loss is irreversible, architectural monuments may not be cloned. It is imperative to put a stop to losing the masterpieces of the wooden architecture in which Russia used to be so rich. The VII Parliamentary Forum in June 2018 in Suzdal dedicated to this most fragile part of our cultural heritage has raised the issue of the necessity to ensure the safety of the cultural heritage object's that are located far from populated places, in the hard to access areas which was historically predetermined. Russia possesses a unique experience in protecting the objects of the national significance. Vandalizing priceless cultural masterpieces is a kind of terrorism which our country prevails. In our opinion, the state should adopt a comprehensive inter-agency program for protection of the cultural heritage of the Russian North, Siberia and Far East.
[Show full text]
Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation Dated July
Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation dated July 17, 1998 On the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (Incorporates changes and additions of August 7, August 14, October 31, November 14, December 18, 1998; February 27, August 30, September 3, September 9, October 16, December 31, 1999; March 16, October 19, 2001; and May 15, 2002) In connection with the Federal Law “On Privatization of State Property and Fundamental Principles of Privatizing Municipal Property in the Russian Federation”, and in accordance with paragraph 1 of Decree # 478 of the President of the Russian Federation dated May 11, 1995 “On Measures to Guarantee the Accommodation of Privatization Revenues in thee Federal Budget” (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 1995, # 20, page 1776; 1996, # 39, page 4531; 1997, # 5, page 658; # 20, page 2240), the Government of the Russian Federation has resolved: 1. To adopt the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (attached). In accordance with Decree # 1514 of the President of the Russian Federation dated December 21, 2001, pending the adoption by the President of the Russian Federation in concordance with Article 6 of the Federal Law “On Privatization of State and Municipal Property” of lists of strategic enterprises and strategic joint-stock companies, changes and additions to the list of joint-stock companies adopted by this Resolution shall bee introduced by Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation issued on the basis of Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation.
[Show full text]
Supplementary Materials For
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/science.1242642/DC1 Supplementary Materials for Chelyabinsk Airburst, Damage Assessment, Meteorite Recovery, and Characterization Olga P. Popova, Peter Jenniskens,* Vacheslav Emel’yanenko, Anna Kartashova, Eugeny Biryukov, Sergey Khaibrakhmanov, Valery Shuvalov, Yurij Rybnov, Alexandr Dudorov, Victor I. Grokhovsky, Dmitry D. Badyukov, Qing-Zhu Yin, Peter S. Gural, Jim Albers, Mikael Granvik, Läslo G. Evers, Jacob Kuiper, Vladimir Kharlamov, Andrey Solovyov, Yuri S. Rusakov, Stanislav Korotkiy, Ilya Serdyuk, Alexander V. Korochantsev, Michail Yu Larionov, Dmitry Glazachev, Alexander E. Mayer, Galen Gisler, Sergei V. Gladkovsky, Josh Wimpenny, Matthew E. Sanborn, Akane Yamakawa, Kenneth L. Verosub, Douglas J. Rowland, Sarah Roeske, Nicholas W. Botto, Jon M. Friedrich, Michael E. Zolensky, Loan Le, Daniel Ross, Karen Ziegler, Tomoki Nakamura, Insu Ahn, Jong Ik Lee, Qin Zhou, Xian-Hua Li, Qiu-Li Li, Yu Liu, Guo-Qiang Tang, Takahiro Hiroi, Derek Sears, Ilya A. Weinstein, Alexander S. Vokhmintsev, Alexei V. Ishchenko, Phillipe Schmitt-Kopplin, Norbert Hertkorn, Keisuke Nagao, Makiko K. Haba, Mutsumi Komatsu, Takashi Mikouchi (the Chelyabinsk Airburst Consortium) *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Published 7 November 2013 on Science Express DOI: 10.1126/science.1242642 This PDF file includes: Supplementary Text Figs. S1 to S87 Tables S1 to S24 References Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following: (available at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/science.1242642/DC1) Movie S1 O. P. Popova, et al., Chelyabinsk Airburst, Damage Assessment, Meteorite Recovery and Characterization. Science 342 (2013). Table of Content 1. Asteroid Orbit and Atmospheric Entry 1.1. Trajectory and Orbit............................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Making the Russian Bomb from Stalin to Yeltsin
MAKING THE RUSSIAN BOMB FROM STALIN TO YELTSIN by Thomas B. Cochran Robert S. Norris and Oleg A. Bukharin A book by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Westview Press Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford Copyright Natural Resources Defense Council © 1995 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................. List of Tables ................................................... Preface and Acknowledgements ..................................... CHAPTER ONE A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE SOVIET BOMB Russian and Soviet Nuclear Physics ............................... Towards the Atomic Bomb .......................................... Diverted by War ............................................. Full Speed Ahead ............................................ Establishment of the Test Site and the First Test ................ The Role of Espionage ............................................ Thermonuclear Weapons Developments ............................... Was Joe-4 a Hydrogen Bomb? .................................. Testing the Third Idea ...................................... Stalin's Death and the Reorganization of the Bomb Program ........ CHAPTER TWO AN OVERVIEW OF THE STOCKPILE AND COMPLEX The Nuclear Weapons Stockpile .................................... Ministry of Atomic Energy ........................................ The Nuclear Weapons Complex ...................................... Nuclear Weapon Design Laboratories ............................... Arzamas-16 .................................................. Chelyabinsk-70
[Show full text]
Russian Urbanization in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Eras
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND URBANIZATION AND EMERGING POPULATION ISSUES WORKING PAPER 9 Russian urbanization in the Soviet and post-Soviet eras by CHARLES BECKER, S JOSHUA MENDELSOHN and POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT BRANCH KSENIYA BENDERSKAYA NOVEMBER 2012 HUMAN SETTLEMENTS GROUP Russian urbanization in the Soviet and post-Soviet eras Charles Becker, S Joshua Mendelsohn and Kseniya Benderskaya November 2012 i ABOUT THE AUTHORS Charles M. Becker Department of Economics Duke University Durham, NC 27708-0097 USA [email protected] S Joshua Mendelsohn Department of Sociology Duke University Durham, NC 27708-0088 USA [email protected] Kseniya A. Benderskaya Department of Urban Planning and Design Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 USA [email protected] Acknowledgements: We have benefited from excellent research assistance from Ganna Tkachenko, and are grateful to Greg Brock, Timothy Heleniak, and Serguey Ivanov for valuable discussions and advice. Above all, the BRICS urbanization series editors, Gordon McGranahan and George Martine, provided a vast number of thought-provoking comments and caught even more errors and inconsistencies. Neither they, nor the others gratefully acknowledged, bear any responsibility for remaining flaws. © IIED 2012 Human Settlements Group International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) 80-86 Gray’s Inn Road London WC1X 8NH, UK Tel: 44 20 3463 7399 Fax: 44 20 3514 9055 ISBN: 978-1-84369-896-8 This paper can be downloaded free of charge from http://www.iied.org/pubs/display.php?o=10613IIED. A printed version of this paper is also available from Earthprint for US$20 (www.earthprint.com) Disclaimer: The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed here do not represent the views of any organisations that have provided institutional, organisational or financial support for the preparation of this paper.
[Show full text]
Assessment of the Innovative and Investment Potential for Business Development
IBIMA Publishing IBIMA Business Review https://ibimapublishing.com/articles/IBIMABR/2020/746932/ Vol. 2020 (2020), Article ID 746932, 11 pages, ISSEN : 2165-9990 DOI : 10.5171/2020.746932 Research Article Assessment of The Innovative and Investment Potential for Business Development Ekaterina KOLMAKOVA, Evgenia KOLMAKOVA and Irina KOLMAKOVA South Ural State University (National Research University), Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk , Russia Correspondence should address to: Irina KOLMAKOVA ; [email protected] Received date: 1 October 2019 ; Accepted date: 14 December 2019 ; Published date: 12 June 2020 Academic Editor: Tatiana Sergeevna Kolmykova Copyright © 2020. Ekaterina KOLMAKOVA, Evgenia KOLMAKOVA and Irina KOLMAKOVA. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 Abstract The implementation of innovations and investments is an important condition for business development in the region. Creating a favorable investment climate for entrepreneurs will contribute to the stable functioning and development of the region’s economy. The authors propose a methodology for assessing the innovation and investment potential of municipalities in a particular region. The methodology is based on the analysis of statistical indicators in five groups: production and finance, labor, infrastructure, investment and social sphere. The main stages of the methodology are: to identify indicators that characterize the innovation and investment potential; determine the indicator’s value for each municipality; to assess a complex indicator of the territory’s
[Show full text]