DOCSLIB.ORG

TEAP Progress Report May 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES THAT DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER UNEP REPORT OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT PANEL MAY 2005 PROGRESS REPORT UNEP MAY 2005 REPORT OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT PANEL PROGRESS REPORT May 2005 TEAP Progress Report iii Montreal Protocol On Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer Report of the UNEP Technology and Economic Assessment Panel May 2005 PROGRESS REPORT The text of this report is composed in Times New Roman. Co-ordination: Technology and Economic Assessment Panel Composition of the report: Lambert Kuijpers Layout: Dawn Lindon, Eindhoven, Netherlands Ozone Secretariat, UNEP Reproduction: UNON Nairobi Date: May 2005 Under certain conditions, printed copies of this report are available from: UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME Ozone Secretariat, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya This document is also available in portable document format from the UNEP Ozone Secretariat's website: http://www.unep.org/ozone/teap/Reports/TEAP_Reports/ No copyright involved. This publication may be freely copied, abstracted and cited, with acknowledgement of the source of the material. ISBN: 92-807-2641-2 iv May 2005 TEAP Progress Report Disclaimer The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) Co-chairs and members, the Technical and Economic Options Committee, chairs, Co-chairs and members, the TEAP Task Forces Co-chairs and members, and the companies and organisations that employ them do not endorse the performance, worker safety, or environmental acceptability of any of the technical options discussed. Every industrial operation requires consideration of worker safety and proper disposal of contaminants and waste products. Moreover, as work continues - including additional toxicity evaluation - more information on health, environmental and safety effects of alternatives and replacements will become available for use in selecting among the options discussed in this document. UNEP, the TEAP Co-chairs and members, the Technical and Economic Options Committee, chairs, Co-chairs and members, and the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel Task Forces Co-chairs and members, in furnishing or distributing this information, do not make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or utility; nor do they assume any liability of any kind whatsoever resulting from the use or reliance upon any information, material, or procedure contained herein, including but not limited to any claims regarding health, safety, environmental effect or fate, efficacy, or performance, made by the source of information. Mention of any company, association, or product in this document is for information purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation of any such company, association, or product, either express or implied by UNEP, the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel Co-chairs or members, the Technical and Economic Options Committee chairs, Co-chairs or members, the TEAP Task Forces Co-chairs or members or the companies or organisations that employ them. Acknowledgement The Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, its Technical and Economic Options Committees and the Task Forces Co-chairs and members acknowledges with thanks the outstanding contributions from all of the individuals and organisations who provided support to Panel, Committees and Task Forces Co-chairs and members. The opinions expressed are those of the Panel, the Committees and Task Forces and do not necessarily reflect the reviews of any sponsoring or supporting organisation. The TEAP thanks Axima Refrigeration GmbH for hosting the TEAP meeting in Lindau/Bodensee, Germany, where this report was discussed, composed and finalised. May 2005 TEAP Progress Report v UNEP MAY 2005 REPORT OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT PANEL PROGRESS REPORT May 2005 TEAP Progress Report vii Foreword The May 2005 TEAP Report The May 2005 TEAP Report consists of three volumes: Volume 1: May 2005 TEAP Progress Report Volume 2: May 2005 TEAP Replenishment Task Force Report Volume 3: May 2005 TEAP Foams End-of-Life Task Force Report Volume 1 Volume 1 contains an Executive Summary of all TEAP Progress Report topics, as well as the Executive Summary of Volume 2 and 3. Volume 1 contains the essential use report, progress reports, the CTOC report, the MB QPS report, the MB CUN report, and TEAP member biographies and membership lists. Volume 2 Volume 2 is the Assessment Report of the TEAP Replenishment Task Force of the Funding Requirement for the Replenishment of the Multilateral Fund during 2006-2008, in response to Decision XVI/35. Volume 3 Volume 3 is the Foams End-of- Life Task Force Report according to Decision XV/10. The UNEP Technology and Economic Assessment Panel: Stephen O. Andersen, co-chair USA Thomas Morehouse USA Jose I. Pons, co-chair VEN Ian Porter (convenor) AUS Lambert Kuijpers, co-chair NL Miguel Quintero COL Radhey Agarwal IND Ian Rae (interim) AUS Paul Ashford UK K. Madhava Sarma IND Jonathan Banks AUS Helen Tope AUS David Catchpole (interim) UK Dan Verdonik (interim) USA Tamás Lotz H Ashley Woodcock UK Nahum Marban Mendoza MEX Masaaki Yamabe J Michelle Marcotte (convenor) CDN Shiqiu Zhang PRC viii May 2005 TEAP Progress Report UNEP MAY 2005 REPORT OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT PANEL PROGRESS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS .....................................................................................................................PAGE FOREWORD........................................................................................................................................... VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRESS REPORT ...................................................................................1 REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL USE NOMINATIONS FOR METERED DOSE INHALERS (MDIS) ..................................1 UPDATE OF THE HANDBOOK ON ESSENTIAL USE NOMINATIONS .................................................................1 MEDICAL TOC TECHNICAL PROGRESS........................................................................................................1 FOAMS TOC TECHNICAL PROGRESS ...........................................................................................................2 HALON TOC TECHNICAL PROGRESS ...........................................................................................................4 REFRIGERATION, AC AND HEAT PUMPS TOC TECHNICAL PROGRESS.........................................................5 CHEMICALS TOC TECHNICAL PROGRESS ....................................................................................................6 METHYL BROMIDE TOC PROGRESS REPORT.............................................................................................11 MBTOC CUN REPORT .............................................................................................................................12 METHYL BROMIDE QPS TASK FORCE REPORT..........................................................................................13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPLENISHMENT TASK FORCE REPORT.........................................14 MANDATE AND CONSULTATIONS...................................................................................................14 DATA AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................15 FUNDING REQUIREMENT FOR THE 2006-2008 REPLENISHMENT OF THE MULTILATERAL FUND ........................................................................................................18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOAM END-OF-LIFE ISSUES TASK FORCE REPORT ......................20 TEAP PROGRESS REPORT ....................................................................................................................31 1 ESSENTIAL USES ...............................................................................................................33 1.1 ESSENTIAL USE NOMINATIONS FOR METERED DOSE INHALERS (MDIS).................................33 1.1.1 Criteria for Review of Essential Use Nominations for MDIs..................................................33 1.1.2 Review of Nominations ...........................................................................................................33 1.1.3 Summary of Parties’ Essential Use Nominations and Review of Quantities ..........................33 1.1.4 Observations on nominations..................................................................................................34 1.1.4.1 Surplus CFCs and stockpile issues...................................................................................................34 1.1.4.2 Maintaining flexibility for essential use exemptions and stockpile reductions.................................35 1.1.5 Committee Evaluation and Recommendations........................................................................36 1.1.5.1 European Community ......................................................................................................................36 1.1.5.2 Russian Federation ...........................................................................................................................37 1.1.5.3 United States ....................................................................................................................................38 2 MEDICAL TECHNICAL OPTIONS COMMITTEE (MTOC) PROGRESS REPORT................................................................................................................................49
Recommended publications
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States

    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States

    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests.
  • Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir

    Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir

    Importation of Fresh Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Shelled or in Pods, from Jordan into the Continental United States A Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Risk Assessment February 14, 2011 Version 2 Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Beans from Jordan Executive Summary In this risk assessment we examined the risks associated with the importation of fresh beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), in pods (French, green, snap, and string beans) or shelled, from the Kingdom of Jordan into the continental United States. We developed a list of pests associated with beans (in any country) that occur in Jordan on any host based on scientific literature, previous commodity risk assessments, records of intercepted pests at ports-of-entry, and information from experts on bean production. This is a qualitative risk assessment, as we express estimates of risk in descriptive terms (High, Medium, and Low) rather than numerically in probabilities or frequencies. We identified seven quarantine pests likely to follow the pathway of introduction. We estimated Consequences of Introduction by assessing five elements that reflect the biology and ecology of the pests: climate-host interaction, host range, dispersal potential, economic impact, and environmental impact. We estimated Likelihood of Introduction values by considering both the quantity of the commodity imported annually and the potential for pest introduction and establishment. We summed the Consequences of Introduction and Likelihood of Introduction values to estimate overall Pest Risk Potentials, which describe risk in the absence of mitigation.
  • Arthropod Pests of Citrus Roots

    Arthropod Pests of Citrus Roots

    lds. r at ex­ ual to ap ­ ila­ red t is een vi­ Clayton W. McCoy fa­ University of Florida ks Citrus Res ea rch and Educati on Center, Lake Alfred )0­ Ily I'::y les Ill­ up 10 Arthropod Pests of Citrus Roots 'ul r-J!l 'Ie '](1 cc The major arthropods that are injurious to plant roots are Geographical Distribution members of the classes Insecta and Acari (mites). Two-thi rds of these pests are members of the order Coleoptera (beetles), Citrus root weevi ls are predominantly trop ical ; however, a which as larvae cause serious economic loss in a wide range few temperate species are important pests in the United States, of plan t hosts. Generally, the larvae hatch from eggs laid by Chile. Argentina. Australia. and New Zealand (Table 14.1). adults on plan ts or in the soil and complete part of their life The northern blue-green citrus root weevil, Pachnaeus opalus; cycle chewing on plant roots, and in many cases as adults the Fuller rose beetle, Asynonychus godmani: and related spe ­ they feed on the foli age of the same or other host plan ts. A cies in the genus Pantomorus are found in temperate areas. Ap ­ number of arthropods inhabit the rhizosphere of citrus trees. proximately 150 species have been recorded in the Caribbean some as unique syrnbionts, but few arc injurious to the roots. region, including Florida. Central America, and South America, Only citrus root weevils. termi tes. and ants. in descending or­ feeding as larvae on the roots of all species of the genus Citrus.
  • U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, MICROMITE 4L, 02/05/2002

    U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, MICROMITE 4L, 02/05/2002

    Lf/JO - '176 i)../s/~o~ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE 01' PREVENTION. PESTICIDES ANO TOXIC SUBSTANCES Judith O. Ball Registration Specialist FEe 5 20D2 Research .t DcveIopment 74 Amity 1load Bethany, CT 06524-3402 Subject: EPA Reg. No. 400-476, Micromite 4L Label Amendment Letter dated Jamwy 17, 2002 Dear Ms. Ball: The 1abe1ina referred to above, submitted in connection with registration undec the Fedenl 1nJecticide, FIII'&icide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), u amended, is acceptable provided tIIIt you make the following change to the iIbd: • Bold or highlight lDert Inpients A stamped copy is enclosed for your records. Please submit one (I) copy of your fina1 printed 1abeIing before you releue the product for shipment. If you have any questions or comments about this lett«, pleue contact me at 703-308-8291. Sincerely yours, Rita Kumar, Senior Regulatory Specialist Insecticide Rodenticide Branch Registration Division (7S0Se 1-A]3EL Restricted Use Pesticide. Due to toxicity to aquatic invertebrate animals. For retail sale to and use only by Certified Applicators, or persons under their direct supervision, and only for those uses covered by the Certified Applicator's certification. CCEPTElJ with COMMENl."'S Micromite® 4~'A Letter Dated Insect Growth Regulator FEB 5 2002 Net UDder the Fede,,' Insect~nts: Suspension Concentrate fwABiclde, and Rodenticide. Act, as amended, for th~ pesl.l.dde For Use on Citrus 'Teg!::;tcred, w,d,"'j t:'!), " lh~i~ N{.1 ...LfJro-I-/ iL Active IngredIent: (% by weight) Diflubenzuron N·II (4·Chlorophenyl)amino jcarbonylj- 2, 6·difluorobenzamide· ............... 40.4% Inert Ingredients: ...................................................................................
  • Curriculum Vitae Nico M

    Curriculum Vitae Nico M

    Nico M. Franz – Vitae, February 2020 1 Curriculum Vitae Nico M. Franz Address Campus School of Life Sciences PO Box 874501 Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA Collection Alameda Building – Natural History Collections 734 West Alameda Drive Tempe, AZ 85282-4108, USA Collection – AB 145: (480) 965-2036 Fax: (480) 727-2203 Virtual E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @taxonbytes BioKIC: https://biokic.asu.edu/ Education 1993 – 1996 Prediploma in Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany Undergraduate Advisor: Klaus Kubitzki 1996 Diploma Studies in Systematic Botany and Ecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany Graduate Advisor: Gerhard Gottsberger 1996 – 1999 M.Sc. in Biology, University of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica Graduate Advisor: Paul E. Hanson 1999 Graduate Research Fellow, Behavioral Ecology, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI), Balboa, Panama Research Advisor: William T. Wcislo 1999 – 2005 Ph.D. in Systematic Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Graduate Advisor: Quentin D. Wheeler 2003 – 2005 Postdoctoral Research Fellow, National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California at Sta. Barbara, Sta. Barbara, CA Postdoctoral Mentor: Robert K. Peet Languages English, German, Spanish (fluent); French, Latin, Vietnamese (proficient) Nico M. Franz – Vitae, February 2020 2 Faculty Appointments 2006 – 2011 Assistant Professor (tenure-track appointment), Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR 2011 – present Adjunct Professor, Department
  • Proceedings of International Conference on Alternatives to Methyl Bromide

    Proceedings of International Conference on Alternatives to Methyl Bromide

    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVES TO METHYL BROMIDE LISBON, PORTUGAL, 27-30 SEPTEMBER 2004 1 Title: Proceedings of International Conference on Alternatives to Methyl Bromide Editors: Tom Batchelor and Flávia Alfarroba ISBN: Printed: European Commission, Brussels, Belgium 2 PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVES TO METHYL BROMIDE Editors Tom Batchelor and Flávia Alfarroba 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The organisers are very grateful for the hard work and support from the following people, organisations and commercial enterprises: CONFERENCE ORGANISATION Steering Committee: Mr João Gonçalves (Ministry of Environment); Mme Flávia Alfarroba (Ministry of Agriculture); Mr Ricardo Gomes (Ministry of Agriculture); Prof Manuel Belo Moreira (Technical University of Lisbon); Antonieta Castro (Ministry of Environment); Dr Tom Batchelor (European Commission) Scientific Committee: Dr Tom Batchelor (European Commission); Prof Silva Fernandes (Technical University of Lisbon); Dr Antonio Lavadinho (Ministry of Agriculture) Logistics: Prof Manuel Belo Moreira (Technical University of Lisbon); Mme Antonieta Castro (Ministry of Environment); Mr Luis Morbey (Ministry of Environment); Dr Vidal Abreu (Ministry of Agriculture); Mme Joaquina Fonseca (Ministry of Agriculture) Alternatives Fair: Mr Ricardo Gomes, Mr Joao Sousa Alves, Mr Jorge Moreira (Ministry of Agriculture); Dr Melanie Miller (Consultant); Prof Manuel Belo Moreira (Technical University of Lisbon) MAJOR SPONSORS Instituto do Ambiente (IA, Ministry of Environment), Direcção-Geral de Protecção das Culturas (DGPC, Ministry of Agriculture), Associação para o Desenvolvimento do Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ADISA, Technical University of Lisbon / Faculty of Agronomy), and the European Commission. We are grateful to Dow AgroSciences for a financial contribution towards the cost of travel that allowed some technical experts to attend this conference.
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States

    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 368 561 SE 054 264 TITLE Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Office of Technology Assessment. REPORT NO ISBN-0-16-042075-X; OTA-F-565 PUB DATE Sep 93 NOTE 409p.; Chapter One, The "Summary" has also been printed as a separate publication (OTA-F-566). ANAILABLE FROMU.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328. PUB TYPE Books (010) Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC17 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Animals; Biotechnology; Case Studies; Decision Making; *Federal Legislation; Financial Support; Genetic Engineering; International Law; Natural Resources; *Plants (Botany); *Public Policy; Science Education; State Legislation; Weeds; Wildlife Management IDENTIFIERS Environmental Issues; Environmental Management; *Environmental Problems; Florida; Global Change; Hawaii; *Non Indigenous Speciez ABSTRACT Non-indigenous species (NIS) are common in the United States landscape. While some are beneficial, others are harmful and can cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. This study, requested by the U.S. House Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee, examined State and Federal policies related to these harmful NIS. The report is presented in 10 chapters. Chapter 1 identifies the issues and options related to the topic and a summary of the findings from the individual chapters that follow. Chapters 2 "The Consequences of NIS" and 3 "The Changing Numbers, Causes, and Rates of
  • EU Project Number 613678

    EU Project Number 613678

    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
  • Coleoptera: Curculionidae), with Special Reference to South American Taxa

    Coleoptera: Curculionidae), with Special Reference to South American Taxa

    diversity Article A Combined Molecular and Morphological Approach to Explore the Higher Phylogeny of Entimine Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), with Special Reference to South American Taxa Adriana E. Marvaldi 1,*, María Guadalupe del Río 1,*, Vanina A. Pereyra 2, Nicolás Rocamundi 3 and Analía A. Lanteri 1 1 División Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CONICET, Paseo del Bosque s/n, La Plata B1900FWA, Argentina; [email protected] 2 Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de Zonas Áridas, CONICET, C.C. 507, Mendoza 5500, Argentina; [email protected] 3 Laboratorio de Ecología Evolutiva y Biología Floral, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET, FCEFyN, Córdoba X5016GCA, Argentina; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.E.M.); [email protected] (M.G.d.R.) Received: 1 August 2018; Accepted: 20 August 2018; Published: 23 August 2018 Abstract: The Entiminae are broad-nosed weevils constituting the most diverse subfamily of Curculionidae, with over 50 tribes. We performed Bayesian and Maximum Parsimony combined phylogenetic analyses with the main objective of testing higher-level relationships and the naturalness of the major Neotropical and Southern South American (Patagonia and Andes) tribes, including some members from other regions. We compiled a data matrix of 67 terminal units with 63 Entiminae species, as well as four outgroup taxa from Cyclominae, by 3522 molecular (from nuclear 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA, and mitochondrial 16S rDNA and COI gene sequences) and 70 morphological characters. The resulting trees recover a clade Entiminae with a monophyletic Cylydrorhinini and Premnotrypes branching off early.
  • Viewing the Fall Leaves Is Very Popular (Fig

    Viewing the Fall Leaves Is Very Popular (Fig

    Brimblecombe and Hayashi Herit Sci (2018) 6:27 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-018-0186-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Pressures from long term environmental change at the shrines and temples of Nikkō Peter Brimblecombe1* and Mikiko Hayashi1,2 Abstract Background: Important historic buildings at Nikkō are designated National Treasures of Japan or important cultural properties and illustrate notable architectural styles. We examine the records of damaging events and environmental change to estimate that changing balance of threats to guiding strategic planning and protection of the buildings and associated intangible heritage. Methods: Historic records from Nikkō allow past damage to be assessed along with projections of likely future threats. Simple non parametric statistics, Lorenz curves and its associated Gini coefcient aids interpretation of observations. Results: Earthquakes have long represented a threat, but mostly to fxed stone structures. Flooding may be as grow- ing problem, but historically river management has improved. Increasing warmth may mean an increase in the threat of fungal attack. However, insect attack on wood has been a particular problem as recent years have seen damage by wood boring insects, particularly at Sanbutsudō in the temple complex of Rinnō-ji. Although warmer climates may enhance the abundance of insects such as P. cylindricum the life cycle of this rare anobiid is not well understood. The risk of forest fres tends to be higher in drought period, but summer rainfall may well increase at Nikkō. Additionally good forestry practice can reduce this risk. Future changes to climate are likely to alter the fowering dates and the arrival of autumn colours.
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the U.S

    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the U.S

    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests.
  • Part III. Pests of Selected Forest Tree Species

    Part III. Pests of Selected Forest Tree Species

    PART III Pests of selected forest tree species PART III Pests of selected forest tree species 143 Abies grandis Order and Family: Pinales: Pinaceae Common names: grand fir; giant fir NATURAL DISTRIBUTION Abies grandis is a western North American (both Pacific and Cordilleran) species (Klinka et al., 1999). It grows in coastal (maritime) and interior (continental) regions from latitude 39 to 51 °N and at a longitude of 125 to 114 °W. In coastal regions, it grows in southern British Columbia (Canada), in the interior valleys and lowlands of western Washington and Oregon (United States), and in northwestern California (United States). Its range extends to eastern Washington, northern Idaho, western Montana, and northeastern Oregon (Foiles, 1965; Little, 1979). This species is not cultivated as an exotic to any significant extent. PESTS Arthropods in indigenous range The western spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis) and Douglas-fir tussock moth (Orgyia pseudotsugata) have caused widespread defoliation, top kill and mortality to grand fir. Early-instar larvae of C. occidentalis mine and kill the buds, while late- instar larvae are voracious and wasteful feeders, often consuming only parts of needles, chewing them off at their bases. The western balsam bark beetle (Dryocoetes confusus) and the fir engraver (Scolytus ventralis) are the principal bark beetles. Fir cone moths (Barbara spp.), fir cone maggots (Earomyia spp.), and several seed chalcids destroy large numbers of grand fir cones and seeds. The balsam woolly adelgid (Adelges piceae) is a serious pest of A. grandis in western Oregon, Washington and southwestern British Columbia (Furniss and Carolin, 1977). Feeding by this aphid causes twigs to swell or ‘gout’ at the nodes and the cambium produces wide, irregular annual growth rings consisting of reddish, highly lignified, brittle wood (Harris, 1978).