New Biological Therapies: Introduction to the Basis of the Risk of Infection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Biological Therapies: Introduction to the Basis of the Risk of Infection New biological therapies: introduction to the basis of the risk of infection Mario FERNÁNDEZ RUIZ, MD, PhD Unit of Infectious Diseases Hospital Universitario “12 de Octubre”, Madrid ESCMIDInstituto de Investigación eLibraryHospital “12 de Octubre” (i+12) © by author Transparency Declaration Over the last 24 months I have received honoraria for talks on behalf of • Astellas Pharma • Gillead Sciences • Roche • Sanofi • Qiagen Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Paul Ehrlich (1854-1915) • “side-chain” theory (1897) • receptor-ligand concept (1900) • “magic bullet” theory • foundation for specific chemotherapy (1906) • Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine (1908) (together with Metchnikoff) Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author 1981: B-1 antibody (tositumomab) anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody 1997: FDA approval of rituximab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD20-positive NHL 2001: FDA approval of imatinib for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Functional classification of targeted (biological) agents • Agents targeting soluble immune effector molecules • Agents targeting cell surface receptors and antigens • Agents targeting intracellular signalling pathways • Agents targeting other intracellular pathways Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Agents targeting soluble immune effector molecules • Pro-inflammatory cytokines • TNF-α infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept • IFN-γ fontolizumab • Interleukins and their corresponding receptors • IL-1β canakinumab, anakinra, rilonacept, gevokizumab • IL-5 mepolizumab, reslizumab • IL-6 tocilizumab, siltuxumab, olamkicept • IL-12/23 ustekinumab • IL-17A secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab • Immunoglobulins • IgE omalizumab • Complement factors • C5 eculizumab Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Agents targeting cell surface receptors and antigens • Growth factor receptors • ErbB2/HER2 trastuzumab, pertuzumab • EGFR cetuximab, panitumumab • VEGFR ramucirumab • Inhibitory coreceptors (immune checkpoints) • CTLA-4 ipilimumab, tremelimumab • PD-1/PD-L1 nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab • Cell-adhesion molecules • α4 integrins natalizumab, vedolizumab • CD11a efalizumab • Chemokine receptors • CCR4 mogalizumab Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Agents targeting cell surface receptors and antigens • Lymphoid and myeloid cells surface antigens • CD19 blinatumomab, inebilizumab, combotox • CD20 rituximab, 131I-tositumomab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, veltuzumab, ocrelizumab, obinutuzumab, ocaratumomab, • CD22 epratuzumab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, moxetumomab pasedotox, combotox • CD30 brentuximab vedotin • CD33 gemtuzumab ozogamicin • CD38 daratumumab, isatuxumab • CD40 lucatumumab, dacetuzumab • CD52 alemtuzumab • SLAMF7 elotuzumab Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Agents targeting intracellular signalling pathways • Cell-surface receptor-associated tyrosine kinases • VEGF receptor sorafenib, sunitinib, axitinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, cabozantinib • ErbB receptor erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, osimertinib, lapatinib, neratinib • Bruton’s TK ibrutinib, acalabrutinib • Signalling pathway-associated tyrosine kinases • BCR-ABL imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib • BRAF/MEK vemurafenib, dabrafenib, trametinib, cobimetinib, selumetinib, encorafenib • Bruton’s TK ibrutinib, acalbrutinib • PI3K idelalisib, buparlisib, rigosertib, duvelisib • Janus kinases ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, baricitinib • Other signalling pathway-associated molecules • mTOR everolimus, temsirolimus Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author What is the infection risk attributable to each of these targeted agents? Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author What is the infection risk (if any) attributable to each of these targeted agents? Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Factors to be accounted for… • Structure of the agent Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author complementarity- determining regions Mouse origin Human origin Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Applications of engineered mAb technology Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity Complement-dependent cytotoxicity Surface IgG FcγRIII antigen C1q NK cell Antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis Membrane attack IgG complex FcγRI Phagocyte Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Structure of different anti-TNF-α agents Lacks CH1 domain of Fc fragment: lower complement activation than full-length antibodies Lacks Fc fragment: no complement- dependent cytotoxicity or antibody- dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity Adalimumab and Infliximab Etanercept golimumab Certolizumab pegol Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies First generation Increasing murine or chimeric antibodies Increasing Rituximab 90Y-ibritumomab potential Second generation B - Ofatumumab humanized or fully human antibodies cell with reduced immunogenicity Ocrelizumab depletion Veltuzumab for 131 I-tositumomab HGG Third generation antibodies with an engineered Fc Obinutuzumab region to boost CDC and ADCC Ocaratuzumab Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Etanercept Dimeric soluble form of TNF-α receptor linked to hinge and Fc portions of IgG1 Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, juvenile arthritis, spondylitis, psoriasis Embrel® 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks 51-kDa homotrimer allowing simultaneous TNFα binding to 3 receptor molecules one receptor-binding site remains free 1:1 stoichiometric complexes Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Etanercept versus anti-TNFα mAbs no receptor- binding sites left free TNFα 1:1 stoichiometric complexes lower infection risk with etanercept 3:1 stable complexes Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Factors to be accounted for… • Structure of the agent • Mechanism of action: the presumable impact on immune response… Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Transmembrane heterodimer Cell-adhesion molecule Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Natalizumab Monoclonal antibody targeting α4-integrins Relapsing multiple sclerosis and Crohn’s disease Tysabri® 300 mg IV every 4 weeks Leukocyte Endothelial cell α4β1 integrin (VLA-4) V-CAM Blocks translocation of activated VLA-4-expressing leukocyte across de blood-brain barrier Langer-Gould et al. N Engl J Med 2005;353:375-81. Van Assche et al. N Engl J Med 2005;353:362-8. Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Vedolizumab Monoclonal antibody targeting α4β7-integrin Leukocyte Endothelial cell Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis Entyvio® 300 mg IV at weeks 0, 2 and 6; then every 8 weeks α4β1 integrin (VLA-4) V-CAM Overall infection: 7.8% Infection leading to drug discontinuation: 1% Opportunistic infectiona: 0.5% α4β7 integrin MadCAM No cases of PML reported to date mesenteric lymph nodes a and Peyer’s patches CMV colitis,
Recommended publications
  • Old and New Challenges in Uveitis Associated with Behçet's Disease
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Old and New Challenges in Uveitis Associated with Behçet’s Disease Julie Gueudry 1,* , Mathilde Leclercq 2, David Saadoun 3,4,5 and Bahram Bodaghi 6 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, F-76000 Rouen, France 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, F-76000 Rouen, France; [email protected] 3 Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, AP-HP, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoimmunes et Systémiques Rares et Maladies Autoinflammatoires Rares, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France; [email protected] 4 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMR S 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), F-75005 Paris, France 5 Biotherapy (CIC-BTi), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, F-75651 Paris, France 6 Department of Ophthalmology, IHU FOReSIGHT, Sorbonne-AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-2-32-88-80-57 Abstract: Behçet’s disease (BD) is a systemic vasculitis disease of unknown origin occurring in young people, which can be venous, arterial or both, classically occlusive. Ocular involvement is particularly frequent and severe; vascular occlusion secondary to retinal vasculitis may lead to rapid and severe loss of vision. Biologics have transformed the management of intraocular inflammation. However, the diagnosis of BD is still a major challenge. In the absence of a reliable biological marker, diagnosis is based on clinical diagnostic criteria and may be delayed after the appearance of the onset sign. However, therapeutic management of BD needs to be introduced early in order to control inflammation, to preserve visual function and to limit irreversible structural damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Policy: Baricitinib (Olumiant) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.291 Effective Date: 07.24.18 Last Review Date: 11.18 Revision Log
    Clinical Policy: Baricitinib (Olumiant) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.291 Effective Date: 07.24.18 Last Review Date: 11.18 Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description Baricitinib (Olumiant®) is Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. FDA Approved Indication(s) Olumiant is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to one or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapies. Limitation(s) of use: Use of Olumiant in combination with other JAK inhibitors, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), or with potent immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and cyclosporine is not recommended. Policy/Criteria Provider must submit documentation (such as office chart notes, lab results or other clinical information) supporting that member has met all approval criteria. It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Envolve Pharmacy Solutions™ that Olumiant is medically necessary when the following criteria are met: I. Initial Approval Criteria A. Rheumatoid Arthritis (must meet all): 1. Diagnosis of RA; 2. Prescribed by or in consultation with a rheumatologist; 3. Age ≥ 18 years; 4. Member meets one of the following (a or b): a. Failure of a ≥ 3 consecutive month trial of methotrexate (MTX) at up to maximally indicated doses, unless contraindicated or clinically significant adverse effects are experienced; b. If intolerance or contraindication to MTX (see Appendix D), failure of a ≥ 3 consecutive month trial of at least ONE conventional DMARD (e.g., sulfasalazine, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine) at up to maximally indicated doses, unless contraindicated or clinically significant adverse effects are experienced; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunosuppressant Drugs Therapy with COVID-19
    Immunosuppressant Drugs Therapy with COVID-19: Associated Risks, Drug-Drug Interactions & Contraindications Debjyoti Talukdar1, Diane Ignacio2, and Madan Mohan Gupta2 1Teerthanker Mahaveer University 2The University of the West Indies at St Augustine September 24, 2020 Abstract Immunosuppressant drugs like Etanercept, Mycophenolate mofetil, Sirolimus, Cyclosporine and Rituximab can weaken the immune system and make patients susceptible to SARS nCoV-2 virus. These drugs make immunocompromised persons more vulnerable to complications associated with COVID-19. Moreover, it can also increase the mortality and morbidity, as a weakened immune system can lead to longer duration of infection. This study discusses the guidelines on immunosuppressant drugs and its associated risk factors with COVID-19, issued by the U.S CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), WHO (World Health Organisation), U.S FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and other accredited global health organisa- tions. Moreover, it also includes information about pharmaceutical properties, mechanism of action, COVID-19 associated risk factors, adverse drug reactions, contraindications and drug-drug interactions. Our study will help government partners and international health organisations to better understand COVID-19 health risks associated with immunosuppressants. Increased public awareness about effective drug therapy for autoimmune diseases, cancer treatment, immunocompromised and organ transplant patients will help lower the mortality and morbidity associated with the disease amid COVID-19 pandemic. 1. INTRODUCTION As per the U.S Department of Health and Human Services and U.S FDA, immunosuppressant drugs can cause susceptibility to viruses leading to infection with increase in morbidity of the disease. It can cause severe risk of illness from COVID-19 due to a weakened immune system.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Report 2020/21 Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
    Quality Report 2020/21 Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust HOME . COMMUNITY- .1 HOSPITAL - WE WORK TOGETHER Quality Report 2020/21 CONTENTS Page Chief Executive’s Introduction ......................................................................................................................1 Progress on our 2020/21 Priorities: Governor Priorities ..............................................................................3 Progress on our 2020/21 Priorities: Trust Priorities .....................................................................................6 Improvements to Quality and Safety 2020/21 .............................................................................................7 Our Priorities for 2021/22: Governor Priorities ..........................................................................................15 Our Priorities for 2021/22: Trust Priorities .................................................................................................16 Duty of Candour ..........................................................................................................................................18 Learning from Deaths ..................................................................................................................................18 Seven Day Services ......................................................................................................................................21 NHS Staff Survey Results for indicators KR19 and KF27 ...........................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive QSAR Tools to Aid in Early Process Development of Monoclonal Antibodies
    Predictive QSAR tools to aid in early process development of monoclonal antibodies John Micael Andreas Karlberg Published work submitted to Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Engineering November 2019 Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the fastest growing markets for diagnostic and therapeutic treatments over the last 30 years with a global sales revenue around $89 billion reported in 2017. A popular framework widely used in pharmaceutical industries for designing manufacturing processes for mAbs is Quality by Design (QbD) due to providing a structured and systematic approach in investigation and screening process parameters that might influence the product quality. However, due to the large number of product quality attributes (CQAs) and process parameters that exist in an mAb process platform, extensive investigation is needed to characterise their impact on the product quality which makes the process development costly and time consuming. There is thus an urgent need for methods and tools that can be used for early risk-based selection of critical product properties and process factors to reduce the number of potential factors that have to be investigated, thereby aiding in speeding up the process development and reduce costs. In this study, a framework for predictive model development based on Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling was developed to link structural features and properties of mAbs to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) retention times and expressed mAb yield from HEK cells. Model development was based on a structured approach for incremental model refinement and evaluation that aided in increasing model performance until becoming acceptable in accordance to the OECD guidelines for QSAR models.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae: Daniel J
    CURRICULUM VITAE: DANIEL J. WALLACE, M.D., F.A.C.P., M.A.C.R. Up to date as of January 1, 2019 Personal: Address: 8750 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 350 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (310) 652-0010 FAX: (310) 360-6219 E mail: [email protected] Education: University of Southern California, 2/67-6/70, BA Medicine, 1971. University of Southern California, 9/70-6/74, M.D, 1974. Postgraduate Training: 7/74-6/75 Medical Intern, Rhode Island (Brown University) Hospital, Providence, RI. 7/75-6/77 Medical Resident, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. 7/77-6/79 Rheumatology Fellow, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA. Medical Boards and Licensure: Diplomate, National Board of Medical Examiners, 1975. Board Certified, American Board of Internal Medicine, 1978. Board Certified, Rheumatology subspecialty, 1982. California License: #G-30533. Present Appointments: Medical Director, Wallace Rheumatic Study Center Attune Health Affiliate, Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Attending Physician, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, 1979- Clinical Professor of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 1995- Professor of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 2012- Expert Reviewer, Medical Board of California, 2007- Associate Director, Rheumatology Fellowship Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 2010- Board of Governors, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 2016- Member, Medical Policy Committee, United Rheumatology, 2017- Honorary Appointments: Fellow, American College of Physicians (FACP) Fellow, American College of Rheumatology (FACR)
    [Show full text]
  • Fontolizumab, a Humanised Anti-Interferon C Antibody
    1131 INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.2005.079392 on 28 February 2006. Downloaded from Fontolizumab, a humanised anti-interferon c antibody, demonstrates safety and clinical activity in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease D W Hommes, T L Mikhajlova, S Stoinov, D Sˇtimac, B Vucelic, J Lonovics, M Za´kuciova´, G D’Haens, G Van Assche, S Ba, S Lee, T Pearce ............................................................................................................................... Gut 2006;55:1131–1137. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.079392 See end of article for Introduction: Interferon c is a potent proinflammatory cytokine implicated in the inflammation of Crohn’s authors’ affiliations ....................... disease (CD). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of fontolizumab, a humanised anti-interferon c antibody, in patients with moderate to severe CD. Correspondence to: Methods: A total of 133 patients with Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) scores between 250 and 450, Dr D W Hommes, Department inclusive, were randomised to receive placebo or fontolizumab 4 or 10 mg/kg. Forty two patients Gastroenterology and received one dose and 91 patients received two doses on days 0 and 28. Investigators and patients were Hepatology, Academic unaware of assignment. Study end points were safety, clinical response (decrease in CDAI of 100 points or Medical Centre, C2-111, ( Meibergdreef 9 1105 AZ, more), and remission (CDAI 150). Amsterdam, the Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the primary end point of the study (clinical Netherlands; response) between the fontolizumab and placebo groups after a single dose at day 28. However, patients d.w.hommes@ receiving two doses of fontolizumab demonstrated doubling in response rate at day 56 compared with amc.uva.nl placebo: 32% (9/28) versus 69% (22/32, p = 0.02) and 67% (21/31, p = 0.03) for the placebo, and 4 Revised version received and 10 mg/kg fontolizumab groups, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Anti-Cytokine Biologic Treatment Beyond Anti-TNF in Behçet's Disease
    Review Anti-cytokine biologic treatment beyond anti-TNF in Behçet’s disease A. Arida, P.P. Sfikakis First Department of Propedeutic Internal ABSTRACT and thrombotic complications (1-3). Medicine Laikon Hospital, Athens, Unmet therapeutic needs in Behçet’s Treatment varies according to type and University Medical School, Greece. disease have drawn recent attention to severity of disease manifestations. Cor- Aikaterini Arida, MD biological agents targeting cytokines ticosteroids, interferon-alpha and con- Petros P. Sfikakis, MD other than TNF. The anti-IL-17 anti- ventional immunosuppressive drugs, Please address correspondence to: body secukinumab and the anti-IL-2 such as azathioprine, cyclosporine-A, Petros P. Sfikakis, MD, receptor antibody daclizumab were not cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, First Department of Propedeutic superior to placebo for ocular Behçet’s and Internal Medicine, are used either alone or in combination Laikon Hospital, in randomised controlled trials, com- for vital organ involvement. During the Athens University Medical School, prising 118 and 17 patients, respec- last decade there has been increased use Ag Thoma, 17, tively. The anti-IL-1 agents anakinra of anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies in GR-11527 Athens, Greece. and canakinumab and the anti-IL-6 patients with BD who were refractory E-mail: [email protected] agent tocilizumab were given to iso- to conventional treatment or developed Received on June 7, 2014; accepted in lated refractory disease patients, who life-threatening complications (4, 5). revised form on September 17, 2014. were either anti-TNF naïve (n=9) or Anti-TNF treatment has been shown to Clin Exp Rheumatol 2014; 32 (Suppl. 84): experienced (n=18).
    [Show full text]
  • Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement Changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix
    United States International Trade Commission Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement Changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix USITC Publication 4208 December 2010 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Deanna Tanner Okun, Chairman Irving A. Williamson, Vice Chairman Charlotte R. Lane Daniel R. Pearson Shara L. Aranoff Dean A. Pinkert Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement Changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix Publication 4208 December 2010 (This page is intentionally blank) Pursuant to the letter of request from the United States Trade Representative of December 15, 2010, set forth at the end of this publication, and pursuant to section 1207(a) of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act, the United States International Trade Commission is publishing the following modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) to implement changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix, effective on January 1, 2011. Table 1 International Nonproprietary Name (INN) products proposed for addition to the Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule INN CAS Number Abagovomab 792921-10-9 Aclidinium Bromide 320345-99-1 Aderbasib 791828-58-5 Adipiplon 840486-93-3 Adoprazine 222551-17-9 Afimoxifene 68392-35-8 Aflibercept 862111-32-8 Agatolimod
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Approaches for the Development of Safer Immunomodulatory Biologics
    REVIEWS Challenges and approaches for the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics Jean G. Sathish1*, Swaminathan Sethu1*, Marie-Christine Bielsky2, Lolke de Haan3, Neil S. French1, Karthik Govindappa1, James Green4, Christopher E. M. Griffiths5, Stephen Holgate6, David Jones2, Ian Kimber7, Jonathan Moggs8, Dean J. Naisbitt1, Munir Pirmohamed1, Gabriele Reichmann9, Jennifer Sims10, Meena Subramanyam11, Marque D. Todd12, Jan Willem Van Der Laan13, Richard J. Weaver14 and B. Kevin Park1 Abstract | Immunomodulatory biologics, which render their therapeutic effects by modulating or harnessing immune responses, have proven their therapeutic utility in several complex conditions including cancer and autoimmune diseases. However, unwanted adverse reactions — including serious infections, malignancy, cytokine release syndrome, anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity as well as immunogenicity — pose a challenge to the development of new (and safer) immunomodulatory biologics. In this article, we assess the safety issues associated with immunomodulatory biologics and discuss the current approaches for predicting and mitigating adverse reactions associated with their use. We also outline how these approaches can inform the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics. Immunomodulatory Biologics currently represent more than 30% of licensed The high specificity of the interactions of immu- biologics pharmaceutical products and have expanded the thera- nomodulatory biologics with their relevant immune Biotechnology-derived peutic options available
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIALTY MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION – SITE of CARE REVIEW GUIDELINES Policy Number: PHARMACY 276.15 T2 Effective Date: September 1, 2017
    UnitedHealthcare® Oxford Clinical Policy SPECIALTY MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION – SITE OF CARE REVIEW GUIDELINES Policy Number: PHARMACY 276.15 T2 Effective Date: September 1, 2017 Table of Contents Page Related Policies INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE .......................................... 1 Actemra® (Tocilizumab) Injection for Intravenous CONDITIONS OF COVERAGE ...................................... 1 Infusion BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS ...................................... 2 Entyvio® (Vedolizumab) COVERAGE RATIONALE ............................................. 2 Exondys 51™ (Eteplirsen) DEFINITIONS .......................................................... 3 Home Health Care DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES ...................................... 3 Infliximab (Remicade®, Inflectra™, Renflexis™) CLINICAL EVIDENCE ................................................. 3 ® REFERENCES ........................................................... 4 Orencia (Abatacept) Injection for Intravenous POLICY HISTORY/REVISION INFORMATION ................. 5 Infusion Radicava™ (Edaravone) Simponi Aria® (Golimumab) Injection for Intravenous Infusion Soliris® (Eculizumab) INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE This Clinical Policy provides assistance in interpreting Oxford benefit plans. Unless otherwise stated, Oxford policies do not apply to Medicare Advantage members. Oxford reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to modify its policies as necessary. This Clinical Policy is provided for informational purposes. It does not constitute medical advice. The term Oxford includes Oxford
    [Show full text]
  • R&D Briefing 76
    The Impact of Recent Regulatory Developments on the Mexican Therapeutic Landscape Access to innovative medicines is key to El acceso a medicamentos innovadores es clave para improving overall population health, reducing mejorar la salud de toda la población, para reducir los hospitalisation time and decreasing morbidity and tiempos de hospitalización, la morbilidad y la mortalidad mortality. An efficient regulatory process can be de un país. Un proceso regulatorio eficiente tiene un reflected in measurable positive health impacts; impacto positivo medible en la salud, y por el contrario, conversely, activities that slow or impede acciones que retrasan o impiden la eficiencia regulatoria y regulatory efficiency and predictability can be su predictibilidad pueden ser perjudiciales. La parálisis detrimental. Recent developments in the Mexican reciente del Sistema regulatorio mexicano respecto a la regulatory system for the assessments of evaluación de nuevos medicamentos innovadores innovative new products have had a negative conlleva un impacto negativo en la salud de la población impact on Mexican public health. mexicana. This Briefing addresses the impact of suspending Este informe analiza el impacto de la suspensión de las the activities of the New Molecules Committee actividades del Comité de Moléculas Nuevas (NMC, por (NMC) on the Mexican therapeutic landscape. sus siglas en inglés) sobre el horizonte terapéutico de First, we compared the way that “new medicines” México. En primer lugar, comparamos la definición de are defined within the context of the Mexican nuevos medicamentos según el contexto regulatorio regulatory system, with definitions used by mexicano con las definiciones adoptadas por otras comparable regulators and health organisations. agencias reguladoras u organizaciones de salud del We have also investigated the extent to which mundo.
    [Show full text]