H:\Cases\Rainmakers\Witnesses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Basilica Mass Held in Remembrance of Valero Craig, Harris Debate Nature
the Observer The Independent Newspaper Serving Notre Dame and Saint Mary’s Volume 44 : Issue 118 FRIDAY, APRIL 8, 2011 ndsmcobserver.com Basilica Mass held in remembrance of Valero Students fill church to commemorate life of Keenan sophomore; Fr. Tom Doyle delivers homily to congregation brought them together and By MEGAN DOYLE and SAM delivered them to the Lord,” STRYKER Doyle said. “That’s what it News Editors means to be a family. That’s what it means to be Notre Rain fell and the Basilica’s Dame.” bells chimed as hundreds filed Students filled the Basilica out of the Basilica of the Sacred pews during the memorial Heart Thursday evening after a Mass for Valero less than one Mass of Remembrance in honor week after campus learned of of Sean Valero. his death. During the Mass, Fr. Tom Fr. Joseph Carey, interim Doyle recounted the sopho- director of Campus Ministry, more’s funeral, held only 12 presided over the Mass, and hours earlier. Doyle, vice president of Student At the request of the Valero Affairs, delivered the homily to family, four of his friends from the standing room only congre- Keenan walked in the funeral gation. procession alongside his par- The men of Keenan Hall filled ents and sister as the casket the first six rows, dressed in was carried down the aisle of blazers, and Keenan rector Fr. St. Helen’s Church in Dan Nolan was among the cele- Niskayuna, N.Y. brants on the altar. The image of Valero’s friends Luke’s gospel about the heal- and family illustrated the ing of a paralytic highlighted Doyle’s message in the homily: the need to be humble in diffi- Our brokenness can bring us cult times, Doyle said. -
The Public Integrity Section During 2008
REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE ACTIVITIES AND OPERATIONS OF THE PUBLIC INTEGRITY SECTION FOR 2008 Public Integrity Section Criminal Division United States Department of Justice Submitted Pursuant to Section 603 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 INTRODUCTION This Report to Congress is submitted pursuant to the Ethics in Government Act of i 978, which requires the Attorney General to report annually to Congress on the operations and activities of the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section. The Report describes the activities of the Public Integrity Section during 2008. It also provides statistics on the nationwide federal effort against public corrption during 2008 and over the previous two decades. The Public Integrity Section was created in i 976 in order to consolidate into one unit of the Criminal Division the Department's oversight responsibilities for the prosecution of criminal abuses of the public trust by government officials. Section attorneys prosecute selected cases involving federal, state, or local officials, and also provide advice and assistance to prosecutors and agents in the field regarding the handling of public corrption cases. In addition, the Section serves as the Justice Department's center for handling various issues that arise regarding public corrption statutes and cases. An Election Crimes Branch was created within the Section in 1980 to supervise the Department's nationwide response to election crimes, such as voter fraud and campaign- financing offenses. The Branch reviews all major election crime investigations throughout the countr and all proposed criminal charges relating to election crime. During the year, the Section maintained a staff of approximately twenty-nine attorneys, including experts in extortion, bribery, election crimes, and criminal conflicts of interest. -
USSS) Director's Monthly Briefings 2006 - 2007
Description of document: United States Secret Service (USSS) Director's Monthly Briefings 2006 - 2007 Requested date: 15-October-2007 Appealed date: 29-January-2010 Released date: 23-January-2010 Appeal response: 12-April-2010 Posted date: 19-March-2010 Update posted: 19-April-2010 Date/date range of document: January 2006 – December 2007 Source of document: United States Secret Service Communications Center (FOI/PA) 245 Murray Lane Building T-5 Washington, D.C. 20223 Note: Appeal response letter and additional material released under appeal appended to end of this file. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. -
The 15 Most Corrupt Members of Congress Featuring
CREW’S MOST THE 15 MOST CORRUPT MEMBERS OF CONGRESS FEATURING A Project of TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 Methodology....................................................................................................................................2 The Violators A. Members of the House.............................................................................................3 I. Vern Buchanan (R-FL) ...............................................................................4 II. Ken Calvert (R-CA).....................................................................................9 III. Nathan Deal (R-GA)..................................................................................18 IV. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL)............................................................................24 V. Jerry Lewis (R-CA)...................................................................................27 VI. Alan Mollohan (D-WV).............................................................................44 VII. John Murtha (D-PA)..................................................................................64 VIII. Charles Rangel (D-NY).............................................................................94 IX. Laura Richardson (D-CA).......................................................................110 X. Pete Visclosky -
In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
USCA Case #16-5138 DocumentRECORD #1657109 NO. 16 -Filed:5138 01/24/2017 Page 1 of 59 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 3, 2017 In The United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia Circuit CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant-Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRIEF OF APPELLANT David L. Sobel Adam J. Rappaport LAW OFFICE OF DAVID L. SOBEL CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND 5335 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 640 ETHICS IN WASHINGTON Washington, DC 20015 455 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Floor 6 (202) 246-6180 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 408-5565 Counsel for Appellant Counsel for Appellant THE LEX GROUPDC ♦ 1825 K Street, N.W. ♦ Suite 103 ♦ Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-0001 ♦ (800) 856-4419 ♦ Fax: (202) 955-0022 ♦ www.thelexgroup.com USCA Case #16-5138 Document #1657109 Filed: 01/24/2017 Page 2 of 59 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 28(a)(1), Appellant Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington hereby certifies as follows: A. Parties and Amici. Plaintiff-appellant is Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a non-profit corporation. Defendant-appellee is the United States Department of Justice. There were no amici curiae in district court. B. Ruling Under Review. The ruling under review is the district court’s March 30, 2016 order, ECF Dkt. No. 37 (and incorporated memorandum opinion, ECF Dkt. No. 36), in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. -
Rep. Roy Blunt: Ties to Special Interests Leave Him Unfit to Lead
Rep. Roy Blunt: Ties to Special Interests Leave Him Unfit to Lead Congress Watch January 2006 Acknowledgements Congress Watch Research and Investigations Director Taylor Lincoln and Congress Watch Researcher Conor Kenny were the primary authors of Rep. Roy Blunt: Ties to Special Interests Leave Him Unfit to Lead. Congress Watch Director Frank Clemente provided significant editorial guidance. Congress Watch Legislative Assistant Beth O’Brien and Congress Watch intern Eddie Thomas Jr. provided extensive research assistance. Congress Watch Civil Justice Research Director Chris Schmidt served as an editor on the project. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a 150,000 member non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, research and public education. Founded in 1971, Public Citizen fights for consumer rights in the marketplace, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform, fair trade, clean and safe energy sources, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen has six divisions and is active in every public forum: Congress, the courts, governmental agencies and the media. Congress Watch is one of the five divisions. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003 P: 202-546-4996 F: 202-547-7392 http://www.citizen.org ©2006 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 2 Rep. Roy Blunt: Unfit to Lead Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... -
2006 FOIA References, Data, Summaries, and Real Person Type Contacts Related to the Cherokee Peoples and to the Many U.S
2006 BIA FOIA Log January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006 FOIA/PA# First Name Last Name Description of Request Dated Completed All documents establishing or interpreting policy or procedural standards and requirements governing a petition for a secretarial 02075 Regina J. Parot election under Part 82 of 25 CFR 2/9/2006 5/16/2006 02152 Exempt Information Exempt Information 10/18/2006 10/20/2006 Copy of letter sent to the Office of Federal Acknowledgment dated 02152o Leon Stockton August 8, 2006 from named individuals 10/18/2006 10/20/2006 Administrative file of what the Secretary of Interior recognized as the 03277 Jerri Mazzetti base roll for the Rincon, San Luiseno Band of Mission Indians 2/22/2006 8/3/2006 The complete administrative file that assisted William D. Bettenberg in 03280 Jerri Mazzetti determining his written response dated 7/5/91 letter 2/22/2006 9/22/2006 Copy of administrative record in proceedings that may have taken place before the IBIA in consideration of tribe's petition for Federal 03985 Gary Johnson acknowledgment 3/20/2006 4/26/2006 All letters, correspondence, minutes, email, etc, between BIA and Cherokee Nation concerning litigation, approval of amendment to 04644 David Thornton, Sr. constitution and/all correspondence regarding the 2003 tribal election 1/9/2006 11/5/2005 Any and all listed documents re Oneida Nation of New York; Certification of Raymond Halbritter's current government over Oneida 05309 Leslie Lo Baugh Nation in New York and other related documents 1/20/2006 3/23/2006 All electronic records, electronic documents, and other documents pertaining to the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians, California, Petitions 06550 Loretta Tuell 84a and 84b 4/24/2006 4/24/2006 Documents regarding the BIA's reconsidered final determinations (RFD) for the Schaghticoke Tribal Nation and the Eastern Pequot Tribal 06557 Gale Courey Toensing Nation 2/14/2006 12/8/2006 06816 Leonard L. -
People Convicted in the Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
LEGACY 1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 March July February April July 24 January Pull and archive Sue Schmidt Pull and archive Jim Van Pull and archive Erika Bolstad Miami Pull and archive David Rosenbaum New Jack Abramoff in an e-mail message Bernie Sprague contacts Tom Washington Post stories on lobbying DeHei WSJ lobbying article on Jack Herald story on SunCruz Casino partner York Times story on Jack Abramoff calls the federal lobbyist for the Rodgers in order to tell Tom what is abuses as involves Oklahoma Abramoff; Adam Kidan and accompanying murder and the amounts he is charging Native Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas occurring on the Saginaw Chippewa Cheyenne-Arapaho Indian tribe; allegations; American tribes; (Tom Rodgers) a moron for seeking reservation as involves their lobbyist Meet with David Safavian, future Bush to publicly execute a federal Jack Abramoff and asks for help. Administration GSA Chief of Staff Pull and archive Jim Legget Alexan- legislative strategy: They agree to work together and and OMB Administrator for Federal dria Town Talk article referencing Jack share information; Procurement Policy, at law offices of June Abramoff and efforts by him to stop the Pull and archive Larry Lebowitz Miami McGuiness & Holch in order to discuss Jena Choctaw casino; Ernest Sickey and Tom Rodgers Herald story on SunCruz casinos and November internet gaming strategy. Tom Rodgers meet in Palm Springs California to alleged mob ties; Monica Quigly an attorney for the states to David Safavian that “David Pull and archive Peter Stone discuss Jack Abramoff and what Saginaw Chippewas contacts Tom you need to stay away from Jack the National Journal story on K Street and Jack is doing to the Coushatta Tribe Rodgers and asks for help. -
M:\Oversight and Investigation\Indian Lobbying\Report\Sections\Bosses' Drafts\ID1.Cover Page.Wpd
“GIMME FIVE”— INVESTIGATION OF TRIBAL LOBBYING MATTERS FINAL REPORT BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS ONE HUNDRED AND NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 22, 2006 PRINTED FOR THE USE OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS “GIMME FIVE”— INVESTIGATION OF TRIBAL LOBBYING MATTERS CONTENTS Page TABLE OF NAMES ............................................................................................................ vi TABLE OF ENTITIES ........................................................................................................... ix INVESTIGATION HEARINGS ............................................................................................. xii INVESTIGATION STAFF LIST ............................................................................................. xv INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND FINDINGS ............................................................................ 9 Part One - Fact Summary by Tribe I. MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS .................................................................. 15 A. Introduction ................................................................................................. 15 B. Background on Tribe ................................................................................... 16 C. Background on Abramoff and the Tribe’s Relationship .............................. 18 D. Substantial Fees and Conduit Organizations .............................................. -
Deposition of Ruben Barrales Regarding Jack Abramoff
1 2 3 1 Ms. Amerling. Good morning. 2 Mr; Barrales. Good morning. 3 Ms. Amerling. On behalf of the Committee on Oversight 4 and Government Reform, I thank you for being here today. 5 This proceeding is known as a deposition -- 6 Mr. Barrales. Right. 7 Ms. Amerling. and the chairman of the committee has 8 sought this deposition as part of the committee's 9 investigation of Jack Abramoff's contacts with the 10 White House. 11 My name is Kristin Amerling, and I have been designated 12 majority counsel for the this deposition. The person 13 transcribing this proceeding is a House reporter and a 14 notary public who is authorized to administer oaths. 15 She will now administer the oath to you. 16 [Witness sworn.] 17 Ms. Amerling. Let me also note for the record the other 18 staff and members of the committee who are present. 19 I'm ~ccompanied by Anna Laitin, who is a professional 20 staff member for the committee: Susanne Sachsman,who is 21 counsel for the majority staff 22 The Witness. Hello. 23 Ms. Amerling. -- on the committee. 24 Mr. Castor. Steve Castor, counsel for the Republican 25 staff. 4 1 Ms. Amerling. And also Congressman Issa. 2 Congressman, would you like to make any opening 3 statements? 4 Mr. Issa. Briefly. I guess maybe just briefly. 5 I'm here both because Ruben, in the private sector now, 6 represents my constituency on behalf of the greater San Diego 7 Chamber but also because I knew him before, during his time 8 in government, and I have a keen interest both in the 9 continued investigation of Abramoff and also, in this case, 10 the belated nature of this deposition. -
Page 1 of 4 Lexisnexis(TM) Academic
LexisNexis(TM) Academic - Document Page 1 of 4 Home | Sources | How Do I? | Site Map | What's New | Help Search Terms: Abramoff FOCUS™ Edit Search Document 1 of 5. Copyright 2006 Newsweek All Rights Reserved Newsweek January 16, 2006 U.S. Edition SECTION: POLITICS; Pg. 40 LENGTH: 2346 words HEADLINE: A Washington Tidal Wave; Blackjack: Members of Congress rushed to give back money. DeLay stepped aside. Reformers pledged to fix the system. Can anything change the Capitol's money-hungry ways? Behind the Abramoff lobby scandal. BYLINE: By Michael Isikoff, Holly Bailey and Evan Thomas; With Mark Hosenball and Eleanor Clift BODY: First came the dinner invitations, then the tickets. Staffers in the office of former House Majority leader Tom DeLay could dine--usually, free of charge--at Signatures, the expense-account restaurant conveniently owned by lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Then they could sit in his skybox at Washington's MCI Center, home of the NBA Wizards and NHL Capitals. Before too long, recalled a former GOP leadership aide--who, like almost anyone on Capitol Hill these days, declines to be identified talking about his relationship with Abramoff--the DeLay staffers began to think that Abramoff's box at the arena was their box, and, in the cozy way of Washington, it might as well have been. "Jack was sort of like a drug dealer," said the former staffer. "He'd give them [DeLay's staffers] a little taste and then get them hooked." It may be convenient for Hill staffers to think of Abramoff as insidious, subtly corrupting idealistic but naive public servants. -
Report: Jack Abramoff's Contacts with White House Officials
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM PROPOSED COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 11, 2008 JACK ABRAMOFF’S CONTACTS WITH WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS CHAIRMAN HENRY A. WAXMAN RANKING MEMBER TOM DAVIS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................ 1 I. BACKGROUND ............................................................. 3 A. Jack Abramoff’s Lobbying Practice .................................................3 B. The Public Corruption Scandal Surrounding Jack Abramoff..........4 C. White House Reaction to the Abramoff Scandal.............................5 D. The Committee’s Investigation in the 109th Congress....................6 E. The Committee’s Investigation in the 110th Congress....................8 II. FINDINGS .................................................................... 11 A. Jack Abramoff Had Access to the White House ...........................11 B. Jack Abramoff Influenced Some White House Actions................13 1. White House Officials Intervened in a State Department Decision Regarding Extending the Employment of State Department Official Allen Stayman ......................................14 2. The White House Communicated with the Abramoff Team in Considering Candidates for Political Positions in the Administration .........................................................................19 3. Mr. Abramoff Influenced Decisions about Presidential Political Endorsements............................................................21 4. Unanswered