DOCSLIB.ORG

Numbers Are Page Numbers. Letters F and T Refer to a Figure Or Table

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Numbers Are Page Numbers. Letters F and T Refer to a Figure Or Table Index Numbers are page numbers. Letters f and t refer to a figure or table. absorption coefficient, 214, 221 aircraft safety, 348 absorption cross section, 188 ALEXIS. See Atmospheric Lidar absorption line strength, 215 Experiment in Space absorption lines, 214, 215, 218 ALISSA system, 380–381 ACE. See Aerosol Characterization ALOHA. See Airborne Lidar and Experiment Observations of the Hawaiian additive Gaussian noise approximation Airglow (AGNA), 351 ammonia (NH3), 187, 204 ADEDIS. See Appareil de détection à amplified spontaneous emission (ASE), distance 411 ADM. See Atmospheric Dynamics AMPS payload. See Atmospheric, Mission Magnetospheric and Plasmas in ADN. See Asian Dust Network Space payload Advanced Remote Gaseous Oxides analytic solutions, QSA and, 79–82 Sensor (ARGOS), 197, 198f Ångström exponent, 106, 106t, 115, 192 aerodynamical alignment, 36 angular scattering function, 50, 80 Aerosol Characterization Experiment anti-Stokes Raman scattering, 244, 247, (ACE), 134 248, 283 aerosols. See particles APDS. See avalanche photodiodes AGNA. See additive Gaussian noise Appareil de détection à distance approximation (ADEDIS), 204 airborne lidar, 355–358, 360–368 ARGOS. See Advanced Remote Gaseous DIAL and, 357–358 Oxides Sensor history of, 355–358 ARM. See Atmospheric Radiation uses of, 360–363 Measurement Program wind measurement and, 344–347 AROTEL. See Airborne Raman Ozone, Airborne Lidar and Observations of the Aerosol and Temperature Lidar Hawaiian Airglow (ALOHA), 363 ASE. See amplified spontaneous emission Airborne Raman Ozone, Aerosol and Asian Dust Network (ADN), 107 Temperature Lidar (AROTEL), 364 ASSESS. See Airborne Science Spacelab Airborne Science Spacelab Experiments Experiments System Simulation System Simulation (ASSESS), 361 asymmetry factor, 80, 85 446 INDEX ATLID. See Atmospheric Lidar System beam expansion, 4 Atmospheric Dynamics Mission (ADM), BELINDA. See broadband-emission lidar 391 with narrow-band determination of Atmospheric Lidar Experiment in Space absorption (ALEXIS), 359 Bernoulli equation, 45, 111 Atmospheric Lidar System (ATLID), 359 bioaerosol detection, 437–439 Atmospheric, Magnetospheric and Boltzmann distribution, 276, 284, Plasmas in Space (AMPS) payload, 319, 363 358 boundary layer flow, 108, 342f, 343 Atmospheric Radiation Measurement boundary value problem, 86 Program (ARM), 226 Brillouin scattering, 156, 274, 275t, atomic absorption filters, 149–151, 282 276, 402 automotive lighting, 182 broadband-emission lidar with narrow-band determination of absorption (BELINDA), 16, B-spline functions, 122 399–414, 413f Ba, See barium broadening processes, 215, 216, 317, background mode, 130 401, 403–414 backscatter, 8–10, 44, 105–141, 143, butane (C H ), 203 188, 242 4 10 aerosols and, 116, 158f. See also particles Ca. See calcium air molecules and, 10, 143 Cabannes line, 13, 15, 249, 274, 276, 402 attenuated, 158f Cai-Liou model, 66 coefficient, units of, 9 calcium (Ca), 276, 308, 315t, 316 conversion factors, 131 calibration, 155–157, 157f, 258, 286 depolarization and, 24, 30t, 50. See CALIOP. See Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with also depolarization Orthogonal Polarization DIAL. See differential absorption lidar CALIPSO mission, 380, 384, 385, 385f, Doppler shifts and, 17 386, 389, 389f, 390 effective, 89–90 CAMEX. See Convection And Moisture efficiency, 120 Experiment elastic, 12–13, 47, 107, 243, 292, 361 carbon dioxide (CO2), 25, 203, 242 equation for, 109–112 carbon monoxide (CO), 187, 203 extinction and, 45, 46, 89, 97, 131, CARL. See Cloud And Radiation Lidar 132f, 136f. See also extinction CART. See Clouds And Radiation inelastic. See Raman lidar Testbed lidar equation and, 44. See also lidar CAT. See clear-air turbulence equation ceilometers, 175, 175f, 179, 180f particulate matter and, 10. See also centrifugal distortion constant, 283, 285t particles CERES system, 390 polarization and, 23, 24, 30t, 50. See CH4. See methane also polarization C2H4. See ethylene ratio, 110, 131, 132f, 147, 192, 242, C2H6. See ethane 282, 292 C3H8. See propane rotational Raman method, 281 C4H10. See butane See also scattering; specific systems, Chebyshev particles, 24 parameters chirp, 422–424 backward enhancement, 435f chlorine (Cl2), 196 ballistic trajectories, 436–437 cirrus clouds. See clouds barium (Ba), 149 Cl2. See chlorine base functions, 122, 123 clear-air turbulence (CAT), 348 INDEX 447 climate forcing, 122 Deirmendjian distribution, 96, 171 climate modeling, 106 DEMP. See diethylmethylphosphonate Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal depolarization, 20, 26–33, 51–52, 361 Polarization (CALIOP), 385–386, backscatter and, 24, 30t, 50 388t causes of, 23 Cloud And Radiation Lidar (CARL) 226 circular, 21, 159, 159f clouds, 23, 27–28, 39, 107 cirrus, 37f average reflection, 87 clouds, 22 ceiling, 179–181 linear, 20, 21, 30, 30t, 33, 50, 52 cirrus, 29, 30, 34, 37f, 51, 90, 95 Lorenz-Mie theory, 28 climate and, 28 measures of, 20–23 cumulus, 50 ratio, 34f, 49 dense diffusion, 84–88 rotational Raman signal, 284, 290 detection of, 177–182 York University model, 52 droplets in, 29 See also polarization ice crystals in, 19, 22, 24, 29–31, 35t desert dust, 27 liquid water content, 99 di-isopropylmethylphosphonate LITE and. See Lidar In Space (DIMP), 204 Technology Experiment DIAL. See differential absorption lidar mesospheric, 363 DIAL approximation, 404 mixed phase in, 31 diethylmethylphosphonate (DEMP), 204 noctilucent, 28 differential absorption lidar (DIAL), particles in. See particles 15–16, 39, 187–212, 219, 224, small optical depths, 91 236, 274 stratospheric. See stratospheric clouds absorption lines, 218 subvisual, 34 airborne, 357, 364 temperature measurements in, 274, 292 backscattering and, 192 virtual profiles, 63 BELINDA and, 16, 399–441 visibility and, 165–186 broadening effects, 403–405 water clouds, 28 convection experiment, 234 Clouds And Radiation Testbed (CART), corrections for, 190, 191, 206 226, 227f, 228, 230 data acquisition and, 224 CO. See carbon monoxide differential absorption coefficient, 214 CO2. See carbon dioxide dual, 207 coherent Doppler lidar, 337 equation for, 188, 190, 221 collision broadening, 216, 317, 401–414 extinction and, 190 collision parameters, 61, 216 far-infrared, 203–206 continuous-wave Doppler lidar, 331 guidelines for, 210 contrails, 29 LaRC and, 357, 362, 365–366 Convection And Moisture Experiment LASE and, 234 (CAMEX), 234 MDIAL, 208 convective boundary layer, 108 mid-infrared, 202–203 correction algorithms, 89, 192 model atmosphere, 192, 192f cross sections, 245–252, 284, 310, 311f multi-wavelength, 206–209 cross-sensitivity, 190 ozone and, 357 cross-validation, 126–127 Raman lidar and, 16 crosswinds, 329 scattering and, 407f spectral distribution, 217, 406 DAS lidar. See differential temperature measurement, 236–238, absorption lidar 276, 399 DBS. See Doppler beam swinging scan types of, 196–206 448 INDEX differential absorption lidar EOS. See Earth Observing System (DIAL) (Continued) equivalent radiance, 75–76 ultraviolet, 196–200 equivalent source profile, 76 visible-light, 200–202 error amplification, 124 water vapor and, 213, 227f, 234, 357, error analysis, 124, 127–128 358, 365, 391, 399, 407f ESA. See European Space Agency wavelengths in, 195, 206, 218. See ethane (C2H6), 206 also specific systems ethylene (C2H4), 204 white-light femtosecond lidar, European Aerosol Research Lidar 399–441 Network (EARLINET), 107, 266 diffraction scattering, 96, 98 European Space Agency (ESA), 107, 218 diffusion limit, 84–88, 99 Experimental Lidar in Space Experiment DIMP. See (ELISE), 359 di-isoproplylmethylphosphonate extinction, 44, 45, 51, 63, 105, 167, 188 direct-detection Doppler lidar, 332–336, air molecules and, 11, 190 334f, 335f, 343 atmospheric, 143 direct-problem model, 90, 96, 98 backscatter ratio, 110, 131, 132f, 192, discrete dipole approximation, 24 242 Doppler beam swinging (DBS) scan, 341 coefficient, 105 Doppler broadening, 156, 215, 276, conversion factors, 131 317, 401 DIAL and, 190. See also DIAL Doppler-free saturated-absorption effective, 74, 89 spectroscopy, 318 efficiencies, 120 Doppler systems, 17, 18 lidar equation and, 10 DBS scan, 341 lidar ratio, 242 shift in, 243, 308, 325 particles and, 11. See also particles wind lidar, 325–354 rotational Raman and, 287f. See also double-cavity etalon, 412 rotational Raman systems drag forces, 32 wavelength-dependent effects, 189 droplets, 29, 430–439 VOR and, 167 dust, 35, 181 See also specific systems extinction-to-backscatter ratio, 120 EARLINET. See European Aerosol Research Lidar Network Fabry-Perot interferometer, 14, 113, Earth Observing System, 358–359, 368, 147–149, 148f, 282, 412 384, 391 fallstreak, 35t eddy-correlation technique, 233 Faraday filter, 313 effective absorption coefficient, 221 Fe. See iron effective cross section, 311f fiber amplifiers, 163 effective extinction, 74, 89 field-of-view range, 95, 98–99 effective medium theorem, 68–78, 92 filamentation, 416–417, 417f, 420 El Chichón, 130 finite difference methods, 24 elastic backscatter, 12–13, 107, 361 fluorescence, 197, 225t, 274, 275t, 276, equation for, 188 307, 317–321, 363, 432–435, lidar system, 12–13, 107 437–439 signal blocking, 299 flux measurement, 85, 197, 204, 205f suppression of, 292 fog, types of, 172f ELISE. See Experimental Lidar in forward propagation problem, 78 Space Experiment Fourier transforms, 74, 77, 86 Eloranta model, 67 fractal particles, 24 entrainment zone, 232 Fraunhofer formula, 94 INDEX 449 Fredholm integral equation, 120 hydrazine, 187 free path length, 61 hydrogen chloride (HCl), 187, 203 freon, 133, 204 hydrometeors, 20,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toward Non-Invasive Measurement of Atmospheric Temperature Using Vibro-Rotational Raman Spectra of Diatomic Gases
    remote sensing Article Toward Non-Invasive Measurement of Atmospheric Temperature Using Vibro-Rotational Raman Spectra of Diatomic Gases Tyler Capek 1,*,† , Jacek Borysow 1,† , Claudio Mazzoleni 1,† and Massimo Moraldi 2,† 1 Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA; [email protected] (J.B.); [email protected] (C.M.) 2 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universita’ degli Studi di Firenze, via Sansone 1, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; massimo.moraldi@fi.infn.it * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 8 October 2020; Accepted: 15 December 2020; Published: 17 December 2020 Abstract: We demonstrate precise determination of atmospheric temperature using vibro-rotational Raman (VRR) spectra of molecular nitrogen and oxygen in the range of 292–293 K. We used a continuous wave fiber laser operating at 10 W near 532 nm as an excitation source in conjunction with a multi-pass cell. First, we show that the approximation that nitrogen and oxygen molecules behave like rigid rotors leads to erroneous derivations of temperature values from VRR spectra. Then, we account for molecular non-rigidity and compare four different methods for the determination of air temperature. Each method requires no temperature calibration. The first method involves fitting the intensity of individual lines within the same branch to their respective transition energies. We also infer temperature by taking ratios of two isolated VRR lines; first from two lines of the same branch, and then one line from the S-branch and one from the O-branch. Finally, we take ratios of groups of lines.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 5
    CHAPTER CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 5. SPECIAL PROFILING TECHNIQUES FOR THE BOUNDARY LAYER AND THE TROPOSPHERE .............................................................. 640 5.1 General ................................................................... 640 5.2 Surface-based remote-sensing techniques ..................................... 640 5.2.1 Acoustic sounders (sodars) ........................................... 640 5.2.2 Wind profiler radars ................................................. 641 5.2.3 Radio acoustic sounding systems ...................................... 643 5.2.4 Microwave radiometers .............................................. 644 5.2.5 Laser radars (lidars) .................................................. 645 5.2.6 Global Navigation Satellite System ..................................... 646 5.2.6.1 Description of the Global Navigation Satellite System ............. 647 5.2.6.2 Tropospheric Global Navigation Satellite System signal ........... 648 5.2.6.3 Integrated water vapour. 648 5.2.6.4 Measurement uncertainties. 649 5.3 In situ measurements ....................................................... 649 5.3.1 Balloon tracking ..................................................... 649 5.3.2 Boundary layer radiosondes .......................................... 649 5.3.3 Instrumented towers and masts ....................................... 650 5.3.4 Instrumented tethered balloons ....................................... 651 ANNEX. GROUND-BASED REMOTE-SENSING OF WIND BY HETERODYNE PULSED DOPPLER LIDAR ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fraunhofer Lidar Prototype in the Green Spectral Region for Atmospheric Boundary Layer Observations
    Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 6079-6095; doi:10.3390/rs5116079 OPEN ACCESS Remote Sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Article Fraunhofer Lidar Prototype in the Green Spectral Region for Atmospheric Boundary Layer Observations Songhua Wu *, Xiaoquan Song and Bingyi Liu Ocean Remote Sensing Institute, Ocean University of China, 238 Songling Road, Qingdao 266100, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (X.S.); [email protected] (B.L.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-532-6678-2573. Received: 8 October 2013; in revised form: 27 October 2013 / Accepted: 13 November 2013 / Published: 18 November 2013 Abstract: A lidar detects atmospheric parameters by transmitting laser pulse to the atmosphere and receiving the backscattering signals from molecules and aerosol particles. Because of the small backscattering cross section, a lidar usually uses the high sensitive photomultiplier and avalanche photodiode as detector and uses photon counting technology for collection of weak backscatter signals. Photon Counting enables the capturing of extremely weak lidar return from long distance, throughout dark background, by a long time accumulation. Because of the strong solar background, the signal-to-noise ratio of lidar during daytime could be greatly restricted, especially for the lidar operating at visible wavelengths where solar background is prominent. Narrow band-pass filters must therefore be installed in order to isolate solar background noise at wavelengths close to that of the lidar receiving channel, whereas the background light in superposition with signal spectrum, limits an effective margin for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement. This work describes a lidar prototype operating at the Fraunhofer lines, the invisible band of solar spectrum, to achieve photon counting under intense solar background.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of Atmospheric Aerosol and Cloud Using a Polarized Micropulse Lidar in Xi’An, China
    atmosphere Article Observations of Atmospheric Aerosol and Cloud Using a Polarized Micropulse Lidar in Xi’an, China Chao Chen 1,2,3,4, Xiaoquan Song 1,* , Zhangjun Wang 1,2,3,4,*, Wenyan Wang 5, Xiufen Wang 2,3,4, Quanfeng Zhuang 2,3,4, Xiaoyan Liu 1,2,3,4 , Hui Li 2,3,4, Kuntai Ma 1, Xianxin Li 2,3,4, Xin Pan 2,3,4, Feng Zhang 2,3,4, Boyang Xue 2,3,4 and Yang Yu 2,3,4 1 College of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China; [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (K.M.) 2 Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Qingdao 266100, China; [email protected] (X.W.); [email protected] (Q.Z.); [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (X.P.); [email protected] (F.Z.); [email protected] (B.X.); [email protected] (Y.Y.) 3 Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Monitoring Instrument Equipment Technology, Qingdao 266100, China 4 National Engineering and Technological Research Center of Marine Monitoring Equipment, Qingdao 266100, China 5 Xi’an Meteorological Bureau of Shanxi Province, Xi’an 710016, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (X.S.); [email protected] (Z.W.) Abstract: A polarized micropulse lidar (P-MPL) employing a pulsed laser at 532 nm was developed by the Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy Citation: Chen, C.; Song, X.; Wang, of Sciences).
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Surface Wind Speed Estimation from Space-Based Lidar Measurements Y
    Sea surface wind speed estimation from space-based lidar measurements Y. Hu, K. Stamnes, M. Vaughan, Jacques Pelon, C. Weimer, D. Wu, M. Cisewski, W. Sun, P. Yang, B. Lin, et al. To cite this version: Y. Hu, K. Stamnes, M. Vaughan, Jacques Pelon, C. Weimer, et al.. Sea surface wind speed estimation from space-based lidar measurements. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, European Geosciences Union, 2008, 8, pp.3593-3601. hal-00328304v2 HAL Id: hal-00328304 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00328304v2 Submitted on 20 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3593–3601, 2008 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/3593/2008/ Atmospheric © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under Chemistry the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. and Physics Sea surface wind speed estimation from space-based lidar measurements Y. Hu1, K. Stamnes2, M. Vaughan1, J. Pelon3, C. Weimer4, D. Wu5, M. Cisewski1, W. Sun1, P. Yang6, B. Lin1, A. Omar1, D. Flittner1, C. Hostetler1, C. Trepte1, D. Winker1, G. Gibson1, and M. Santa-Maria1 1Climate Science Branch, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA 2Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Processing Jump Point of Lidar Detection Data and Inversing the Aerosol Extinction Coefficient
    The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-3/W9, 2019 ISPRS Workshop on Remote Sensing and Synergic Analysis on Atmospheric Environment (RSAE), 25–27 October 2019, Nanjing, China PROCESSING JUMP POINT OF LIDAR DETECTION DATA AND INVERSING THE AEROSOL EXTINCTION COEFFICIENT Hailun Zhang1, Hu Zhao1,﹡, Yapeng Liu2, Xingkai Wang2, Chang Shu2 1School of Electrical and Information Engineering, North MinZu University Yinchuan 750021, China - [email protected], [email protected] 2School of computer science and engineering, North MinZu University Yinchuan 750021, China - [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Commission Ⅲ, WG Ⅲ/8 KEY WORDS:Extinction Coefficient, Jump Point, Fitting, Interpolation, Invention Method ABSTRACT: For a long time, the research of the optical properties of atmospheric aerosols has aroused a wide concern in the field of atmospheric and environmental. Many scholars commonly use the Klett method to invert the lidar return signal of Mie scattering. However, there are always some negative values in the detection data of lidar, which have no actual meaning，and which are jump points. The jump points are also called wild value points and abnormal points. The jump points are refered to the detecting points that are significantly different from the surrounding detection points, and which are not consistent with the actual situation. As a result, when the far end point is selected as the boundary value, the inversion error is too large to successfully invert the extinction coefficient profile. These negative points are jump points, which must be removed in the inversion process. In order to solve the problem, a method of processing jump points of detection data of lidar and the inversion method of aerosol extinction coefficient is proposed in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Lidar Techniques to Estimate
    DEVELOPMENT OF LIDAR TECHNIQUES TO ESTIMATE ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL PROPERTIES by Mariana Adam A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland October, 2005 © Mariana Adam 2005 All rights reserved DEVELOPMENT OF LIDAR TECHNIQUES TO ESTIMATE ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL PROPERTIES by Mariana Adam ABSTRACT The modified methodologies for one-directional and multiangle measurements, which were used to invert the data of the JHU elastic lidar obtained in clear and polluted atmospheres, are presented. The vertical profiles of the backscatter lidar signals at the wavelength 1064 nm were recorded in Baltimore during PM Supersite experiment. The profiles of the aerosol extinction coefficient over a broad range of atmospheric turbidity, which includes a strong haze event which occurred due to the smoke transport from Canadian forest fires in 2002, were obtained with the near-end solution, in which the boundary condition was determined at the beginning of the complete overlap zone. This was done using an extrapolation from the ground level of the aerosol extinction coefficient, calculated with the Mie theory. For such calculations the data of the ground-based in-situ instrumentation, the nephelometer and two particle size analyzers were used. An analysis of relative errors in the retrieved extinction profiles ii due to the uncertainties in the established boundary conditions was performed using two methods to determine the ground-level extinction coefficient, which in turn, imply two methods to determine aerosol index of refraction (using the nephelometer data and chemical species measurements). The comparison of the three analytical methods used to solve lidar equation (near-end, far-end and optical-depth solutions) is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Polarization Lidar: an Extended Three-Signal Calibration Approach
    Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1077–1093, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1077-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Polarization lidar: an extended three-signal calibration approach Cristofer Jimenez1, Albert Ansmann1, Ronny Engelmann1, Moritz Haarig1, Jörg Schmidt2, and Ulla Wandinger1 1Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, 04318, Germany 2University of Leipzig, Institute for Meteorology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany Correspondence: Cristofer Jimenez ([email protected]) Received: 19 October 2018 – Discussion started: 27 November 2018 Revised: 24 January 2019 – Accepted: 25 January 2019 – Published: 18 February 2019 Abstract. We present a new formalism to calibrate a three- liquid-water, mixed-phase, and ice clouds occurring in the signal polarization lidar and to measure highly accurate height range from the upper planetary boundary layer to the height profiles of the volume linear depolarization ratios un- tropopause. Active remote sensing is a powerful technique to der realistic experimental conditions. The methodology con- continuously and coherently monitor the evolution and life siders elliptically polarized laser light, angular misalignment cycle of clouds in their natural environment. of the receiver unit with respect to the main polarization Recently, Schmidt et al. (2013a, b, 2015) introduced the plane of the laser pulses, and cross talk among the receiver so-called dual-field-of-view (dual-FOV) Raman lidar tech- channels. A case study of a liquid-water cloud observation nique, which allows us to measure aerosol particle extinction demonstrates the potential of the new technique. Long-term coefficients (used as aerosol proxy) close to cloud base of observations of the calibration parameters corroborate the a liquid-water cloud layer and to retrieve, at the same time, robustness of the method and the long-term stability of the cloud microphysical properties such as cloud droplet effec- three-signal polarization lidar.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Similarity of Optical Rotation Trajectories Around the Poincaré Sphere with Application to an Ultra-Narrow Atomic Bandpass filter
    Research Article Vol. X, No. X / April 2016 / Optica 1 Self-similarity of optical rotation trajectories around the Poincaré sphere with application to an ultra-narrow atomic bandpass filter JAMES KEAVENEY1,*,D ENNIS A. RIMMER1, AND IFAN G. HUGHES1 1Joint Quantum Centre (JQC) Durham-Newcastle, Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom *[email protected] July 16, 2018 We present an investigation of magneto-optic rotation in both the Faraday and Voigt geometries. We show that more physical insight can be gained in a comparison of the Faraday and Voigt ef- fects by visualising optical rotation trajectories on the Poincaré sphere. This insight is applied to design and experimentally demonstrate an improved ultra-narrow optical bandpass filter based on combining optical rotation from two cascaded cells - one in the Faraday geometry and one in the Voigt geometry. Our optical filter has an equivalent noise bandwidth of 0.56 GHz, and a figure-of-merit value of 1.22(2) GHz−1 which is higher than any previously demonstrated filter on the Rb D2 line. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/optica.XX.XXXXXX 1. INTRODUCTION The quantitative understanding of atom-light interactions in atomic vapours is a key component in developing new applica- Faraday geometry Voigt geometry tions based on atomic and optical physics. The study of linear and non-linear magneto-optical effects in atomic media has been Fig. 1. particularly fruitful; a review of the field can be found in ref. [1]. Illustration of the Faraday and Voigt geometries, show- ~ Applications include magnetometry for medical imaging [2–4] ing the relative orientation of the wavevector k and the mag- and remote sensing [5], atom-based optical isolators [6], meth- netic field ~B.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbiting Planetary Atmospheric Lidar Space Administration Farzin Amzajerdian, NASA Langley Research Center, [email protected], 757‐864‐1533
    National Aeronautics and Orbiting Planetary Atmospheric Lidar Space Administration Farzin Amzajerdian, NASA Langley Research Center, [email protected], 757‐864‐1533 Overview OPAL operation in orbit Orbiting Planetary Atmospheric Lidar (OPAL) is a multifunctional lidar instrument capable of providing global profiles of major atmospheric parameters: Winds, Density, Temperature, and Aerosols. OPAL beam is pointed to 2 fore and 2 OPAL capitalizes on recent advances achieved by NASA LaRC on highly aft directions making two sheets of efficient lasers and advanced coherent lidar components measurements in the atmosphere. Proposed lidar is substantially smaller than the ones proposed for Earth‐orbiting lidars by taking advantage of properties of targeted atmosphere such as: • High aerosol mixing ratio • Dominance by CO2 • Relaxed measurement accuracy and resolution Science: Global profiles of: Vector wind velocity, Single instrument offers higher data quality and significant reduction in atmospheric density, temperature, and complexity, mass, volume, and power compared to multiple systems aerosol and cloud opacity OPAL principal of operation Coverage ‒ Mars 100 km to surface ‒ Venus 120 km to 50 km High spatial resolution ‒ Vertical: 3 km ‒ Horizontal: Mars 10 km, Venus 20 km OPAL utilizes several NDL components and leverages technologies being developed under LaRC IRAD and SBIR projects NDL components that will be directly used in OPAL Orbiting Planetary Atmospheric Lidar (OPAL) Multifunctional instrument capable of global profiling of: “Vector Wind Velocity”, “Atmospheric Density”, “Temperature”, and “Aerosol and Cloud Opacity” OPAL provides essential atmospheric data for Climate Research, Weather Models, and Design of Future Landing Missions OPAL principal of operation Coverage OPAL beam is pointed to ‒ Mars: 100 km to surface 2 fore and 2 aft ‒ Venus: 120 km to 50 km directions making two High spatial resolution sheets of measurements ‒ Vertical: 3 km in the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Water Vapor Lidar Inter-Comparison Campaign
    remote sensing Letter Toronto Water Vapor Lidar Inter-Comparison Campaign Zen Mariani 1,* , Noah Stanton 2, James Whiteway 2 and Raisa Lehtinen 3 1 Meteorological Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, ON M3H-5T4, Canada 2 Centre for Research in Earth and Space Science, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada; [email protected] (N.S.); [email protected] (J.W.) 3 Vaisala Oyj, 01670 Vantaa, Finland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-416-739-5801 Received: 31 August 2020; Accepted: 23 September 2020; Published: 27 September 2020 Abstract: This study presents comparisons between vertical water vapor profile measurements from a Raman lidar and a new pre-production broadband differential absorption lidar (DIAL). Vaisala’s novel DIAL system operates autonomously outdoors and measures the vertical profile of water vapor within the boundary layer 24 h a day during all weather conditions. Eight nights of measurements in June and July 2018 were used for the Toronto water vapor lidar inter-comparison field campaign. Both lidars provided reliable atmospheric backscatter and water vapor profile measurements. Comparisons were performed during night-time observations only, when the York Raman lidar could measure the water vapor profile. The purpose was to validate the water vapor profile measurements retrieved by the new DIAL system. The results indicate good agreement between the two lidars, with a mean difference (DIAL–Raman) of 0.17 0.14 g/kg. There were two main causes for differences in their ± measurements: horizontal displacement between the two lidar sites (3.2 km) and vertical gradients in the water vapor profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Lidar Studies on Microphysical Influences on the Structure And
    Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., doi:10.5194/acp-2016-456, 2016 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Published: 20 June 2016 c Author(s) 2016. CC-BY 3.0 License. 1 Lidar studies on microphysical influences on the structure 2 and lifetime of tropical cirrus clouds 3 G S Motty1*, Malladi Satyanarayana1, 2, G S Jayeshlal1, and V P Mahadevan Pillai1 4 1. Department of Optoelectronics, University of Kerala, Kariavattom, Trivandrum-695 581, Kerala, India 5 2. Geethanjali College of Engineering & Technology, Cheeryal (V), Keesara (M), R.R.Dist. Hyderabad-501 301, 6 India 7 Correspondence to: G S Motty ([email protected]) 8 9 Abstract. An understanding of the role of ice crystals in the cirrus cloud is significant on the the radiative 10 budget of the planet and consequent changes in the temperature. The structure and composition of the cirrus is 11 affected by the microphysical parameters and size and fall speed of ice crystal inside the clouds. In this study, 12 the structure and dynamics of tropical cirrus clouds were analysed by the microphysical characterisation using 13 the data obtained by the ground based lidar system over the tropical site Gadanki [13.50 N, 79.20 E], India for a 14 period of 6 years from 2005 to 2010. The observed clouds have optical depth within the range 0.02 to 1.8, lidar 15 ratios are in the 20 to 32 sr range and depolarisation ratio varies between 0.05 and 0.45. The altitude and 16 temperature dependence of the parameters, their interdependence and the fall velocity – effective size analysis 17 were investigated.
    [Show full text]