The International Relations Journal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2017 San Francisco State University /Volume 36 The International Relations Journal San Francisco State University A Yearly Publication of the International Relations Department College of Liberal and Creative Arts 2017 San Francisco State University / Volume 36 Table of 02 Journal Staff 03 Editorial Policy contents 04 Acknowledgements 05 Dedication 06 The Role of Government in Economic Success: A Case Study of Taiwan Ka Chio 15 Migration in Central America christiana english 23 North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Development Cody folmar 34 You Are Welcome Here: National Identity and Immigration in Euskadi, Basque Country Hallie hoffman 48 The Pan-Kurdish Myth Miles theodore popplewell 1 2017 San Francisco State University / Volume 36 Journal Staff Managing Editors InDesign Layout Briana Abbink Nouf Aloufi Charlotte Ohrbom Maria Cruz Cardenas Karin Nordin Writers Editors Alanoud Aloufi Naia Ardrey Manal Abdi Eva Charidas Adrienne Chukwuneta Ka Chio Mariah Cobb Caroline Cunningham Saher Ebadi Anas Elallame Daniel Frank Christina English Yena Kim Esvin Enrique Sara Lonegard Cody Folmar Joanalyn Santo Matignas Erica Gratton Nancy Ngo Hallie Hoffman Breanna Reeves Lisa Inoi Andre Saldan Almas Khan Megan Elizabeth Stone John Kulu Iris Tinsley Thomasin Joy Lauria Aimee Varghese Carina Darielle Melara Dani Walsh Miles Theodore Popplewell Noelle Walsh Cody Ryan Flavio Geovany Zanipatin Statements and opinions expressed in The International Relations Journal are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Editors, the Editorial Board, the Faculty Advisor, or the Department of International Relations at San Francisco State University. 2 2017 San Francisco State University / Volume 36 Editorial Policy Overview The International Relations Journal at San Francisco State University strives to exhibit the diverse range of undergraduate and graduate research interests that flourish in our department. Each semester, the Journal is offered as a course in which students participate as writers or editors in a peer review process, or as administrative staff members who assist authors and editors as well as guide the Journal through its production. The goal of the course is to expose students to the peer review process, focusing on academic standards of argumentation and factual accuracy, citation formatting, and collaborative editing using Microsoft Word’s “track changes” feature. More broadly, the Journal’s executive editors aim to help students develop writing/editing skills applicable in other courses and pro- mote a deeper understanding of the discipline of International Relations as a whole. Submissons & Process The Journal encourages all students pursuing a B.A. or M.A. in International Relations to submit completed works (incomplete papers and abstracts are not accepted) at the beginning of each semester. From these submissions, the Journal’s executive editors assign students to positions on the writing and editorial boards as well as a number of administrative-level appoint- ments. The course curriculum includes a number of informational workshops and at least three rounds of structured editing and revi- sion. All editing is anonymous and each submission is reviewed by three different editors. The structured peer review is as follows: [1] a submission is first edited by an undergraduate or graduate “peer expert” who has conducted prior research on topics and/or regions relevant to the paper and can thus provide fact checking and citation suggestions; [2] second round editing focuses on clarity and academic tone my paring the manuscript with an editore unfamil- iar with the paper’s subject; [3] finally, the paper is edited for proper citation formatting and technical aspects. At the end of the semester, authors participating in this process are expected to submit a final manuscript for consideration by the Journal’s executive editors and the faculty advisor. Publication of Articles Only submissions that have gone through the peer review process and meet the content and formatting requirements will be considered for publication. The Journal is published yearly. For Submissions and Back Issues: http://internationalrelations.sfsu.edu/content/international-relations-journal-0 For all other inquiries: Department of International Relations 1600 Holloway Avenue/HUM Room 282 San Francisco, California 94132 PHONE: 415.338.2654/ FA X: 415.338.2880 3 2017 San Francisco State University / Volume 36 Acknowledgements The staff of The International Relations Journal is grateful for the continued funding allocated by the Instructionally Related Activities Committee and the Department of International Relations at San Francisco State University for the production of this journal. The production of this journal is a group effort and the managing editors would like to especially thank all the members of the editorial board and the contributing writers. The editorial board members edited the articles contained in this issue and both the editors and writers patiently endured the labor of multiple revisions of these articles, as well as corresponding with one another. The guidance and advice of Dr. Burcu Ellis in the International Relations Department has been indispensable to the publication of the Journal. 4 2017 San Francisco State University / Volume 36 dedication To Professor Emeritus JoAnn Aviel: With sincere gratitude for decades of dedication and teaching, we thank you. - Model UN Students 5 1 Chio / SPRING 2017 The Role of Government in Economic Success: A Case Study of Taiwan Taiwan’s economic development after 1945 is remarkable. Many Taiwanese By people have lifted out of poverty, and their living standard has significantly improved. Political economists and developmental economists generally consid- Ka Chio er Taiwan’s economic development a success, but they are puzzled by such a remarkable economic success given Taiwan’s limited land and scarce resources. This paper traces Taiwan’s economic history from 1945 to present. It analyzes the government’s role in economic recovery, agricultural reform, and import sub- stitution in the 1950s, export promotion policy in the 1960s, industrial upgrading in the 1970s, and economic integration with Mainland China since the late 1980s. The author argues that state intervention played a key role in initiat- ing, sustaining, and transforming Taiwan’s economy over the past decades, and Taiwan’s economic experience can be a model for developing countries who struggle with neoliberal economic policies. aiwan1 is located off the south- live in poverty because its limited land Teastern coast of China. Its total and huge population are burdens for area is 36,193 square kilometers, and itself. Under Japanese colonial rule its total coastline is about 1,139 kilo- from 1895 to 1945, Taiwan’s economy meters.2 It is approximately 230 miles thrived and surpassed all of East Asia long and 85 miles wide at the center. except for Japan. After World War Taiwan’s size is roughly the size of Two, Taiwan’s economy worsened the Netherlands or the size of the U.S. dramatically. When the Republic of states of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, China (ROC) moved its government to and Connecticut combined.3 As of Taiwan in 1949, some political econ- July 2014, Taiwan had a population of omists and development economists 23.4 million.4 In comparison to other called Taiwan a “basket case” – mean- countries, Taiwan ranks above average ing that it had little or no chance of in population (no. 49 of 221 countries) developing its economy. From 1945 and ranks just below average in land through the 1960s, Taiwan appeared area (no. 136 of 232 countries).5 to have uncompromising prospects From the above basic information, for economic success. From the mid- it seems that Taiwan is an underdevel- 1960s, however, Taiwan’s economy oped country and Taiwanese people took off and soon became a prosperous 6 1 The author would like to thank the peer country. In 2013, its nominal gross reviewers and Professor Joel Kassiola for their domestic product (GDP) and nominal feedback. GDP per capita respectively stood 2 “ROC Vital Information,” Republic of China at $489.13 billion and $20,952.7 Its Yearbook 2014, accessed on May 10, 2015, available at http://www.ey.gov.tw/en/cp.aspx- export volume was about $305.44 ?n=C2D16F4EFE88C268. billion, whereas its import volume was 3 John Franklin Cooper, Taiwan: Nation-State or Province? (Boulder: Westview Press, 6 Ibid., 151. 2009), 2. 7 “ROC Vital Information,” Yearbook 2014; 4 “ROC Vital Information,” Yearbook 2014. Unless otherwise noted, the $ sign refers to the 5 Cooper, Taiwan, 2. U.S. Dollar. 6 Chio / SPRING 2017 about $269.9 billion.8 Taiwan’s rankings in many the ROC government in 1949. After the outbreak of global survey rankings are respectable. For example, the Korean War, the U.S. immediately saw Taiwan as it ranked 17th in Heritage Foundation’s 2014 Index a geographically invaluable strategic point. Subse- of Economic Freedom and 14th in World Economic quently, the U.S. sent massive economic and military Forum’s 2014-2015 Global Competitiveness Index, aid to strength the ROC government on Taiwan and respectively. 9 helped revitalize the war-ravaged Taiwanese econ- Over the past decades, Taiwan’s economic omy. Between 1951 and 1965, the U.S. government development is remarkable. It has successfully sent over $4 billion to Taiwan in the form of grants, transformed itself from an unproductive country to a loans, and military equipment.11 Over the 1950s, prosperous country. It is not an exaggeration to call the U.S. economic assistance equaled about 6 % of its experience an economic success. In order to ex- Taiwan’s GDP and about 40% of its gross invest- amine Taiwan’s economic success, this paper traces ment. The ROC government spent 38% of the aid on Taiwan’s economic history from 1945 to present. It financing imports of immediate goods (mainly cot- attempts to answer two questions: 1) How did the ton, metals, and fertilizer), 30% on consumer goods government play a key role in initiating, sustaining, (mainly food), and 19% on capital goods (machin- and transforming Taiwan’s economy after 1945?, ery and tools).