DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-84408-6 — The Art Collector in Early Modern Italy Monika Schmitter Excerpt More Information INTRODUCTION HEN CHARLES II WAS restored to the English throne in 1660, after the death of Oliver Cromwell and the end of the W English Interregnum, the States of Holland and West Friesland sent the new monarch valuable presents in hopes of securing his favor. Having ascertained that Charles, like his father before him, was partial to Italian pictures and ancient statuary, the Dutch assembled a collection of twenty-eight paintings and twelve sculptures, which together with a luxurious yacht named Mary comprised the so-called “Dutch Gift.” Although the sovereign “thanked them for so worthy a Present, and express’d his willingness to enter into a neerer Alliance with them,” the tribute did little to preserve peace1 between the two maritime powers, who were back at war several years later. Among the paintings shipped from Rotterdam to London in October 1660 was a sixteenth-century Italian portrait depicting a man surrounded by antique statuary and other collectible items (Fig. 1). Soon thereafter, the painting was hanging in the “Green Chamber next to the Bed chamber” at Whitehall. The inventory reads: “Lorenzo Lottie. A man sitting and holding a small head in one 2 Hand w[i]th severall statues by Him. He being an Antiquery.” Although the painting came to England properly attributed (it is in fact signed and dated), whether accidentally or willfully, within about twenty years the artist’s name was obscured. By about 1687 it was said to be a self-portrait by Giorgione; not long after an attribution was made to Correggio, which endured 3 until the middle of the nineteenth century. In the eighteenth and nineteenth 1 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-84408-6 — The Art Collector in Early Modern Italy Monika Schmitter Excerpt More Information 2 INTRODUCTION Fig. 1 Lorenzo Lotto, Portrait of Andrea Odoni, 1527, Royal Collection Trust. © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2020. centuries, both Giorgione and Correggio were descriptions of works of art in public locations and much better known than Lorenzo Lotto, who private collections in the aforementioned Italian had been more or less forgotten after his death. cities. Although the author of these notes had As doubts about the attribution began to mount, been identified within twenty years of their publica- a crucial turning point came in 1858 when Charles tion as the Venetian nobleman Marcantonio Eastlake (1793–1865), the first director of the Michiel (1484–1552), for complex reasons it took National Gallery, London, sent Richard Redgrave a long time for this to be recognized, and as a result (1804–88), Surveyor of the Queen’sPictures, even today this fundamental resource is still occa- 5 a quotation from a text then known as the sionally referred to as “the Anonimo.” 4 “Anonimo” or the “Anonimo Morelliano.” This The passage from Michiel’s notebook that one-of-a-kind manuscript had been discovered in Eastlake sent to Redgrave reads: “Works in Venice by the director of the Marciana Library, Venice ... in the House of Messer Andrea Jacopo Morelli (1745–1819), who published it in Odoni, 1532 ... in the bedroom upstairs ... 1800 under the title Notizia d’opere di disegno nella the portrait of Messer Andrea himself, half- prima metà del secolo XVI esistenti in Padova, length, in oil, who contemplates ancient marble 6 Cremona,Milano,Pavia,Bergamo,CremaeVenezia fragments was by the hand of Lorenzo Lotto.” scrittadaunanonimodiqueltempo. Composed Under Eastlake’s supervision the painting was between ca. 1521 and 1543, the manuscript com- restored in 1863, at which point the signature prises approximately one hundred folios with “Lorenzo Lotto/1527” was discovered in the © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-84408-6 — The Art Collector in Early Modern Italy Monika Schmitter Excerpt More Information INTRODUCTION 3 lower left quadrant of the painting (see Fig. his lifetime, the ensemble did not last long. The 7 131). This felicitous conjunction produced not works of art it contained were dispersed by the only the correct attribution and date, but also the end of the seventeenth century, if not earlier, and identification of the sitter, the painting’s proven- the house itself was transformed beyond recogni- ance, and even its original placement. tion in the nineteenth century. Nonetheless, the This book is only possible due to that coinci- extraordinary confluence of sources (there are dence: that Lotto signed and dated the painting, several others that will be discussed later) allows that Michiel was in the habit of writing fairly me to piece together and imagine the contents detailed descriptions of what he saw when he and decoration of his home, and as a result, to went to people’s houses, and crucially, that when explore Odoni’s identity through his possessions. he visited Odoni’sresidence,contrarytohisusual The detail provided in the documents and com- practice, he recorded in what rooms he saw particu- parison with similar works of art and architecture lar works of art. Two further documents create that do survive, along with the few extant works almost an embarrassment of riches for a scholar owned by Odoni, especially the portrait, provide working on early sixteenth-century art: an inventory rich materials from which to draw my own “por- oftheOdonihousemadein1555,whichisalso trait of Andrea Odoni.” organized by room and is in some aspects more The study of Odoni’s life, house, and collection complete than Michiel’s notes, and a letter by the also enables me to examine Lotto’scompelling famous writer Pietro Aretino addressed to Andrea portrait with new eyes. The painting is far from Odoni (dated 1538). being a straightforward “portrait of a collector”– In this letter Aretino compliments Odoni’scol- in fact, as scholars have long known, the objects in it lecting practices, creating a remarkable synchronism bear little relation to Odoni’s actual possessions. with both Michiel’s notes and Lotto’s portrait. Instead, the portrait presents an imaginary collec- Aretino’s description of the house begins: “But tion, concocted by artist and patron together to whoever wishes to see how clean and candid his depict collecting as a means of transmuting the [Odoni’s] spirit is should look at his face and his self, of transforming a variety of material things house, look at them, I say, and you will see as much into “higher gold.” My interpretation of the portrait serenity and beauty as one can desire in a house and demonstrates how both men conceived the power 8 in a face.” The writer’scontentionthatOdoni’s of objects to form the self. house was essentially a portrait of its owner, Exactly when the painting left the Odoni aparalleltoLotto’s actual likeness, is the launching household is not known. A copy of the head point for this book. The association between and bust alone was likely made for the family Odoni, his house, his collection, and his portrait in the late sixteenth or early seventeenth century also figures in Giorgio Vasari’s Lives of the Artists.In in order to preserve their ancestor’s likeness when 11 the edition of 1568, Vasari not only recorded the they sold his portrait. By about 1622, the original portrait by Lotto but also gave an extended descrip- was probably already in the collection of the Dutch tion of the frescoes by Girolamo da Treviso on the merchant Lucas van Uffelen, who lived in Venice 9 façade. But most revealing is the very short state- from 1616 to the early 1630s. Uffelen’s portrait by ment he included only in the 1550 edition: Anthony van Dyck, dated ca. 1622,isoften “Lotto ... painted Andrea de gli Odoni, whose thought to be inspired by Lotto’s composition 10 12 house in Venice is full of painting and sculpture.” (Metropolitan Museum, New York). Although Vasari’s mention of Odoni’s house Uffelen brought Odoni’sportraitbacktohis indicates how well known the collection was in house in Amsterdam, where he also exhibited © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-84408-6 — The Art Collector in Early Modern Italy Monika Schmitter Excerpt More Information 4 INTRODUCTION augmented by the indefatigable Venetian scholar Emmanuele Antonio Cicogna (1789–1868)invol- ume 3 (1830) of his six-volume Delle iscrizioni veneziane. Cicogna provided more information about the family and visited the still-standing house with a contemporary descendant of the Odoni family. Although Morelli and Cicogna were unaware that the portrait by Lotto had survived, their research formed the basis of future scholarship. In more recent years, a few facts have been cor- rected, additional primary sources have been dis- covered, and Odoni’s biography has been fleshed 18 out, above all by Georg Gronau, Donata 19 Battilotti and Maria Teresa Franco, Rosella 20 21 Lauber, and the present author, but no mono- 22 graph has yet been published on the collector. Although the portrait itself has received scholarly attention over the years, it continues to puzzle its Fig. 2 Raphael of Urbino, Portrait of Baldassare interlocutors. As John Shearman, echoing Jacob 1514–15 Castiglione, , Musée du Louvre, Paris. Photo: Burckhardt, correctly surmised in 1983, “the pic- Erich Lessing/Art Resource, NY. ture is conceptually and psychologically more 23 complex than a simple portrait of a collector.” another famous Renaissance portrait, Raphael’s Lotto’s portrait is widely regarded as one of the 13 Baldassare Castiglione (Fig. 2). After Uffelen’s most accomplished and innovative of the Italian death, Odoni’s portrait was purchased in 1639 by Renaissance – perhaps the best portrait by another Amsterdam collector, Gerard Reynst, and a painter known for his profound and idiosyncratic while in the Reynst collection, it was engraved by approach to the genre.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • War and Society the Dutch Republic, 1581–1806
    War and Society The Dutch Republic, 1581–1806 Branislav L. Slantchev Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego Last updated: May 13, 2014 Contents: 1 Medieval Origins 3 2 From Resistance to Rebellion, 1566–1581 6 3 The Republic Forms, 1581–1609 10 4 Political and Fiscal Institutions 17 5 Thirty Years’ War, 1618–48 23 6 The Golden Age, 1650–72 27 7 The Stadtholderate of William III, 1672–1702 31 8 Decline and Fall, 1702–1806 36 8.1 The Second Stadtholderless Period, 1702–46 . ...... 36 8.2 The Orangist Revolution, 1747–80 . 39 8.3 The Patriots and the Batavian Republic, 1787–1806 . ........ 41 9 Paying for the Republic 43 A Maps 54 Required Readings: Anderson, M.S. 1988. War and Society in Europe of the Old Regime, 1618–1789. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Optional Readings: Blockmans, Wim. 1997. “The Impact of Cities on State Formation: Three Contrasting Territories in the Low Countries, 1300–1500.” In Peter Blickle, Ed. Resistance, Rep- resentation, and Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Blockmans, Wim. 1999. “The Low Countries in the Middle Ages.” In Richard Bonney, ed. The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe, c.1200–1815. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boogman, J.C. 1979. “The Union of Utrecht: Its Genesis and Consequences.” BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review, 94(3): 377–407. ’t Hart, Marjolein. 1999. “The United Provinces, 1579–1806.” In Richard Bonney, ed. The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe, c.1200–1815. Oxford: Oxford University Press. De Vries, Jan. 2001. “The Netherlands in the New World: The Legacy of European Fis- cal, Monetary, and Trading Institutions for New World Development from the Seven- teenth to the Nineteenth Centuries.” In Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Royal Family
    Dutch Royal Family A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 22:31:29 UTC Contents Articles Dutch monarchs family tree 1 Chalon-Arlay 6 Philibert of Chalon 8 Claudia of Chalon 9 Henry III of Nassau-Breda 10 René of Chalon 14 House of Nassau 16 Johann V of Nassau-Vianden-Dietz 34 William I, Count of Nassau-Dillenburg 35 Juliana of Stolberg 37 William the Silent 39 John VI, Count of Nassau-Dillenburg 53 Philip William, Prince of Orange 56 Maurice, Prince of Orange 58 Frederick Henry, Prince of Orange 63 Amalia of Solms-Braunfels 67 Ernest Casimir I, Count of Nassau-Dietz 70 William II, Prince of Orange 73 Mary, Princess Royal and Princess of Orange 77 Charles I of England 80 Countess Albertine Agnes of Nassau 107 William Frederick, Prince of Nassau-Dietz 110 William III of England 114 Mary II of England 133 Henry Casimir II, Prince of Nassau-Dietz 143 John William III, Duke of Saxe-Eisenach 145 John William Friso, Prince of Orange 147 Landgravine Marie Louise of Hesse-Kassel 150 Princess Amalia of Nassau-Dietz 155 Frederick, Hereditary Prince of Baden-Durlach 158 William IV, Prince of Orange 159 Anne, Princess Royal and Princess of Orange 163 George II of Great Britain 167 Princess Carolina of Orange-Nassau 184 Charles Christian, Prince of Nassau-Weilburg 186 William V, Prince of Orange 188 Wilhelmina of Prussia, Princess of Orange 192 Princess Louise of Orange-Nassau 195 William I of the Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Barbara Dissertation Template
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Public Displays of Affection: Negotiating Power and Identity in Ceremonial Receptions in Amsterdam, 1580–1660 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History of Art and Architecture by Suzanne Decemvirale (née Suzanne van de Meerendonk) Committee in charge: Professor Ann Jensen Adams, Chair Professor Mark A. Meadow Professor Richard Wittman December 2018 The dissertation of Suzanne Decemvirale is approved. ____________________________________________ Richard Wittman ____________________________________________ Mark A. Meadow ____________________________________________ Ann Jensen Adams, Committee Chair December 2018 Public Displays of Affection: Negotiating Power and Identity in Ceremonial Receptions in Amsterdam, 1580–1660 Copyright © 2018 by Suzanne van de Meerendonk iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The idea for this dissertation was first conceived during my time as an MA student at the University of Amsterdam in 2010. For key considerations in this project that are still evident in its final version, I am indebted to Eric Jan Sluijter and Jeroen Jansen. Since its conception this project has additionally benefited from the wisdom and mentorship of professors, colleagues, family and friends, as well as financial support provided by several institutions. For each of these contributions I am immensely grateful, as they allowed such incipient ideas to materialize in the manuscript before you today. My largest debt and greatest thanks is to my adviser Ann Jensen Adams, who was my first advocate at UCSB and a constant source of expertise and encouragement during the almost seven years that followed. I am also thankful to Mark Meadow and Richard Wittman for their thoughtful insights as members of my doctoral committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Lecture Series 2012 Absolutism to Enlightenment
    Diploma Lecture Series 2012 Absolutism to enlightenment: European art and culture 1665-1765 Charles II and the restoration Lorraine Kypiotis 15 / 16 February 2012 Lecture summary: The Restoration had an exhilarating bravado characterised by a lavish and flamboyant court. It saw the return of the theatre, a flourishing of the arts and the founding of the Royal Society in a court that was the glamorous and often scandalous centre of a London that would rise from the flames like a phoenix. The return of Charles II to the throne in 1660 marked a moment of political and cultural change almost as dramatic as that brought about by his father’s execution 11 years earlier. After the repressions of the interregnum and the uncertainties and poverty of the exiled court, there was an appetite for exuberance, indulgence and transgression – an appetite that the king came to symbolize. After the puritanical sobriety of Cromwell’s parliament, England once again flourished in the arts and sciences. Charles, and his court patronised a number of scientists, architects, poets and dramatists whose influences were felt far beyond the reign of the “Merry Monarch”. Most importantly in the field of the fine arts, Charles was responsible for the recovery of many of the great paintings in the British Royal Collection that had been sold by the Commonwealth after his father’s execution; for the acquisition of a number of fine works by the great artists of the Baroque; and in his patronage of portraitists such as Sir Peter Lely. Charles and the artists he patronised were responsible for the enduring images of a monarchy restored.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources Published on the Occasion of William's Triumphal Entry in 1691
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/136474 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Dencher, A.R. Title: Commemorating Conquest: The triumphal entry of William III of Orange, King of England, into The Hague in 1691 Issue Date: 2020-09-02 Appendix: Sources published on the occasion of William’s triumphal entry in 1691 Anonymous, Eenvoudige boere-praet, behelsende een overtuygent bewijs, dat in alle het gene dat tot nog toe gehoort, gesien, en geseyt wort, en nog gehoort, gesien en geseyt sou kunnen worden, van William de Derde, Koning van Groot-Britanje, Geen genoeghsame gront is, om te gelooven dat hij de levendighe Koningh selfs soude sijn, en dat het niet wesen soude kunnen een wasse-beelt, s.l., s.n. [1691], p.1. SpeCial ColleCtions of the University of Amsterdam, Call.no. 064-60 Anonymous. Brief van haar maiesteit Maria, koningin van Groot Britanjen, enz. enz., enz., aan syn maiesteit Wilhelm, koning van Groot Britanjen enz. enz., enz. 1691. The Hague, Royal Library, Pamphlet ColleCtion Nr. 13646 Anonymous. De 16 Quartieren van sijne Doorlugtigste Grootmaghtigste Majesteyt William de III. Koninck van Engeland, Vrankrijck, Schotland, en Yrland; Erf-Stadhouder der Vereenigde Nederlanden, &c. Leiden: Johannes Tangena, 1691. 13609 Anonymous, Nederlandt verheerlykt door de verheffinge van Willem de III, Tot de Kroon van Engeland, Schotland, Vrankryk en Yerland, En juychende over de triumphante wederkomst van haren Vorst. 1691. The Hague, Royal Library, Pamphlet ColleCtion Nr. 13624a Anonymous. Imitation d’une épigramme latine présentée à s.m. britannique Guillaume III sur son heureuse arrivée dans les Provinces Unies.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerrit Dou's Niche Pictures: Pictorial Repetition As Marketing Strategy
    Gerrit Dou’s Niche Pictures: Pictorial Repetition as Marketing Strategy Angela Ho Gerrit Dou exemplified the commercially successful genre reduces the time required to finish a painting, and thus brings painter in the seventeenth-century Dutch Republic. His small, the economic benefit of improved productivity.2 However, it is jewel-like paintings made him one of the most celebrated Dutch unlikely that speed of execution was an important consider- artists of his time. From the mid-1640s to the 1670s, Dou ation for Dou. He was known for a time-consuming manner repeatedly framed his genre scenes with an illusionistic stone of painting that involved the rendering of minute details. His window. In this so-called “niche picture” format, Dou posi- paintings were highly valued and, as shall be explained later, tions one or two principal figures just behind a window in a he was not under financial pressure to maintain a large out- shallow foreground. These figures, brightly lit by a raking light put. If we cannot look at Dou’s reuse of motifs as an attempt from the upper left, stand silhouetted against a deep, dark back- to expedite production, how do we account for this practice? ground. The recurrence of this distinctive compositional Some recent studies offer a different economic explanation, scheme is the focus of this essay. While nineteenth- and early namely that Dou was responding to his customers’ demands. twentieth-century criticism regarded Dou as a limited, un- Scholars maintain that early modern viewers had very differ- imaginative artist, most recent studies defend him as some- ent conceptions of “originality” and “creativity” from our own.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2010 Newsletter
    historians of netherlandish art NEWSLETTER AND REVIEW OF BOOKS Dedicated to the Study of Netherlandish, German and Franco-Flemish Art and Architecture, 1350-1750 Vol. 27, No. 1 www.hnanews.org April 2010 Hans von Aachen, The Fall of Phaeton, c. 1600. Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna, on loan to Schloss Ambras In the exhibition Hans von Aachen (1552-1615), Hofkünstler in Europa, Suermondt-Ludwig Museum, Aachen, March 11 – June 13, 2010; Prague Castle Gallery, July 1 – October 3, 2010; Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna, October 19, 2010 – January 9, 2011. © KHM HNA Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, November 2006 1 historians of netherlandish art 23 S. Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904 Telephone/Fax: (732) 937-8394 E-Mail: [email protected] www.hnanews.org Historians of Netherlandish Art Offi cers President - Stephanie Dickey Bader Chair in Northern Baroque Art Queen’s University Kingston ON K7L 3N6 Canada Vice-President - Amy Golahny Lycoming College Williamsport, PA 17701 Treasurer - Rebecca Brienen University of Miami Art & Art History Department PO Box 248106 Coral Gables FL 33124-2618 European Treasurer and Liaison - Fiona Healy Seminarstrasse 7 D-55127 Mainz Germany Board Members Dagmar Eichberger Contents Wayne Franits Matt Kavaler HNA News ............................................................................1 Henry Luttikhuizen Personalia ............................................................................... 2 Shelley Perlove Exhibitions ............................................................................ 3 Joaneath
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural History of Dutch Orangism During The
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2007 Nature, nurture, mythology: a cultural history of Dutch Orangism during the first stadholderless era, 1650-1672 Greg Alan Beaman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Beaman, Greg Alan, "Nature, nurture, mythology: a cultural history of Dutch Orangism during the first stadholderless era, 1650-1672" (2007). LSU Master's Theses. 3570. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATURE, NURTURE, MYTHOLOGY: A CULTURAL HISTORY OF DUTCH ORANGISM DURING THE FIRST STADHOLDERLESS ERA, 1650-1672 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Greg Alan Beaman B.M.A. DePauw University, 2004 December 2007 To my parents To Professor Christine Kooi To the Netherlands ii Table of Contents ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………...…iv INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………...1 CHAPTER ONE: ARBOREAL METAPHORS IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY
    [Show full text]
  • Charles II: Art & Power
    PRESS RELEASE December 2017 Charles II: Art & Power The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace 8 December 2017 – 13 May 2018 On 29 May 1660, his 30th birthday, Charles II made his triumphant return to London and to the thrones of England and Ireland, ending more than a decade of Republican rule. Over the next 25 years, the arts would play a vital role in reinforcing Charles’s legitimacy and authority as a ruler, and in creating a royal court that could re-take its place on the European stage. After 14 years in exile, Charles II was keenly aware of the importance of princely tradition and magnificent display in enforcing his right to the throne and his position as Head of the Church. He ordered new royal regalia and crown jewels to replace those sold off or melted down by the Parliamentarians, and his coronation on 23 April 1661 was the most extravagant John Michael Wright, since that of Elizabeth I. The dazzling display of new Charles II, c.1676 altar plate in Westminster Abbey included a silver-gilt dish by Henry Greenway, nearly a metre in diameter, and a solid-gold chalice and gold paten. One of the first acts of Charles's reign was the recovery of his father's art collection. Although the royal residences had survived the Civil War largely undisturbed, the Commonwealth government had sold off much of their contents, auctioning everything from tapestries valued at £2,000 to blankets worth 6 shillings. In May 1660 Parliament commanded that all persons holding goods formerly belonging to Charles I, Queen Henrietta Maria or the new king were to return them with immediate effect.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EXOTIC GIFT and the ART of the SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY DUTCH REPUBLIC By
    THE EXOTIC GIFT AND THE ART OF THE SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY DUTCH REPUBLIC By ©2013 ELLEN O’NEIL RIFE Submitted to the graduate degree program in Art History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson Linda Stone-Ferrier, Ph.D. ________________________________ Sally J. Cornelison, Ph.D. ________________________________ Stephen H. Goddard, Ph.D. ________________________________ Amy McNair, Ph.D. ________________________________ William D. Keel, Ph.D. Date Defended: 4/9/2013 The Dissertation Committee for Ellen O’Neil Rife certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE EXOTIC GIFT AND THE ART OF THE SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY DUTCH REPUBLIC ________________________________ Chairperson Linda Stone-Ferrier, Ph.D. Date approved: 4/9/2013 ii Abstract This dissertation examines the intersection between art and the gifting of exotic objects in the seventeenth-century United Provinces, directing attention to a special class of imagery visualizing the remarkable extent to which Europe’s first consumer culture became intertwined with foreign goods and influences. Its four chapters present representative case studies encompassing a range of media, including prints and paintings, and artistic genres, such as still life, portraiture, landscape, and allegory, from the mid- through the late- seventeenth century. These episodes of exotic gift exchange and their manifestation in art belonged to public and private spheres, the gifting of men and women, and multiple classes of society. In analyzing these images, my methodology draws on close readings; socioeconomic, historical, pictorial, and cultural contexts; gender; and issues in gift theory, including reciprocity, identity, personalization, and commodity/gift status, to explore the pictures’ meanings or functions for their audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerrit Dou: Seventeenth-Century Artistic Identity and Modes of Self- Referentiality in Self-Portraiture and Scenes of Everyday Life Denise Giannino
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2006 Gerrit Dou: Seventeenth-Century Artistic Identity and Modes of Self- Referentiality in Self-Portraiture and Scenes of Everyday Life Denise Giannino Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS, THEATRE AND DANCE Gerrit Dou: Seventeenth-Century Artistic Identity and Modes of Self- Referentiality in Self-Portraiture and Scenes of Everyday Life By Denise Giannino A Thesis submitted to the Department of Art History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2006 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Denise Giannino defended on June 12, 2006. ____________________________________ James J. Bloom Professor Directing Thesis ____________________________________ Paula Gerson Committee Member _____________________________________ Robert Neuman Committee Member Approved: ______________________________________ Paula Gerson, Chair, Department of Art History _______________________________________ Sallie E. McRorie, Dean, College of Visual Arts, Theatre and Dance The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee members: Dr. Bloom, Dr. Neuman and Dr.Gerson for their time and generosity. I especially owe a debt of gratitude to Dr.Bloom for his willingness to work with me long distance. I would also like my friends and family for their continued support. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………………………v Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………...viii INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………….1 1. DOU AND THE CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT OF LEIDEN: GUILDS, THE MARKET FOR PAINTINGS AND ARTISTIC TRENDS ………………………………………………...11 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Andries De Graeff
    Rhenen, 2-2-2010 Pieter C. Vis, 6132294 3e opdracht, cursus De Amsterdamse culturele elite Dr Madelon Simons, cursusjaar 2009-2010 Master Kunstgeschiedenis De Nieuwere tijd Universiteit van Amsterdam INHOUDSOPGAVE 1 INLEIDING .............................................................................................................................................3 2 WIE WAS ANDRIES DE GRAEFF ......................................................................................................4 2.1 Zijn loopbaan en leven ............................................................................................................4 2.2 Familierelaties (zie ook schema Bijlage C familierelaties) ...............................................6 3 DE POLITIEKE VERHOUDINGEN EN DE ROL VAN ANDRIES DE GRAEFF ................................8 3.1 Bestuur van Amsterdam ...........................................................................................................8 3.2 Politieke ontwikkelingen ..........................................................................................................9 4 ANDRIES DE GRAEFF ALS MECENAS ........................................................................................... 13 4.1 Portretten van Andries de Graeff ...................................................................................... 13 4.1.1 Andries de Graeff als Romeinse consul ........................................................................ 14 4.1.2 Geportretteerd door Govert Flinck ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]