DOCSLIB.ORG

Case Management, Identity Controls and Screening on National Security and 1F Exclusion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case Management, Identity Controls and Screening on National Security and 1F Exclusion Case management, identity controls and screening on national security and 1F exclusion A comparative study on Syrian asylum seekers in five European countries Maarten Bolhuis Joris van Wijk Acknowledgements This report was written by Maarten Bolhuis and Joris van Wijk, researchers working at the Center of International Criminal Justice, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The research was commissioned by the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (Utlendingsdirektoratet, UDI). Members of the Reference Group included three representatives of UDI, a representative of the Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security, a representative of the Norwegian National Police Immigration Service (PU) and a representative of the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST). The authors would like to thank the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration and all members of the Reference Group for their valuable feedback and practical assistance in performing the research. Finally, the authors would like to thank all respondents and experts for sharing their knowledge and views. © 2018 Maarten P. Bolhuis & Joris van Wijk. Cover photo: ‘Wind-formed trees’ by Mike Green 2 Table of content List of acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Sammendrag .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Objective of the study ................................................................................................................. 12 1.2. Rationale and research context .................................................................................................. 12 1.3. Research questions ..................................................................................................................... 13 1.4. Outline of the report ................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.1 Review of academic literature, policy documents and relevant rules and regulations ................ 16 2.2. Interviews ................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.1. Selection of respondents ..................................................................................................... 16 2.2.2. Approach .............................................................................................................................. 19 2.3. Expert meeting............................................................................................................................ 20 2.4. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 3. Context and challenges during the high influx ..................................................................... 22 3.1. Context high influx in focus countries ......................................................................................... 22 3.1.1. Background of the conflict in Syria ...................................................................................... 22 3.1.2. Migration from Syria and the European ‘migrant crisis’ ...................................................... 24 3.1.3. Recognition rates and status given to Syrian applicants ...................................................... 26 3.1.4. Involvement in serious crimes and national security risks ................................................... 30 3.2. Challenges presented by the high influx ..................................................................................... 34 3.2.1. Infrastructural challenges and registration/identification capacity ..................................... 35 3.2.2. Reception and accommodation ........................................................................................... 37 3.2.3. Staff ...................................................................................................................................... 38 3.2.4. Challenges in relation to establishing identity and security ................................................. 38 3.4. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 40 Chapter 4. Organisational capacity and influx management since 2014 ............................................... 41 4.1. Responses aimed at reducing the number of asylum seekers .................................................... 41 4.2. Responses aimed at processing the increased number of asylum claims ................................... 43 4.2.1. Improving infrastructure, logistics, reception and accommodation .................................... 43 4.2.2. Improving case processing capacity ..................................................................................... 45 4.2.3. Improving staff capacity and competence ........................................................................... 52 3 4.3. Status quo and future perspective .............................................................................................. 57 4.3.1. Scaling down ........................................................................................................................ 57 4.3.2. Future perspective ............................................................................................................... 59 4.3.3. Preparedness for the future ................................................................................................ 64 4.4. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 65 Chapter 5. Establishment of identity and decision-making in cases concerning Syrian asylum seekers 67 5.1. The identification process ........................................................................................................... 67 5.1.1. Actors involved in the identification .................................................................................... 67 5.1.2. Procedure ............................................................................................................................ 69 5.2. Methods used to establish identity............................................................................................. 72 5.2.1. Investigation of documents ................................................................................................. 72 5.2.2. Language analysis ................................................................................................................ 76 5.2.3. Interviews ............................................................................................................................ 78 5.2.4. Country of origin checks ...................................................................................................... 81 5.2.5. Social media analysis ............................................................................................................ 81 5.2.6. Data carrier extraction ......................................................................................................... 85 5.2.7. Investigation of biometrics and facial photographs ............................................................. 89 5.2.8. Other methods for establishing the identity ........................................................................ 91 5.2.9. Re-assessment of established identity in Syrian cases ......................................................... 92 5.3. Information exchange on identity ............................................................................................... 94 5.4. Organisation of the decision-making process ............................................................................. 97 5.4.1. Organisation of decision making and country of origin specialisation ................................. 97 5.4.2. Particular issues or measures taken in response to the nature or scale of the influx from 2014 ............................................................................................................................................... 98 5.5. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 99 Chapter 6. Organisation of the screening of Syrian asylum seekers in relation to national security and 1F exclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 101 6.1. Context national security and 1F exclusion ............................................................................... 101 6.1.1. ‘National security’ .............................................................................................................. 101 6.1.2. 1F exclusion ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Is the European Migrant Crisis Another Stage of Hybrid War?
    IS THE EUROPEAN MIGRANT CRISIS ANOTHER STAGE OF HYBRID WAR? Yurii Punda, Vitalii Shevchuk, Viljar Veebel Abstract: This article provides an overview of the roots of large-scale migration flows to the European Union (EU) during the past ten years. In addition, the article also explores the potential link between such migration flows and modern hybrid warfare, characterised by the coordination of various types of warfare (i.e. military and non-military means, conventional and non-conventional capabilities, state and non-state actors, etc.), all employed with an aim to cause instability and disorder. In the 2010s, the migration flows to EU countries increased significantly, particu- larly from the conflict areas in Syria, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, as well as from Albania, Kosovo and Ukraine. The analysis focuses on the question of whether the increase in migration flows could be linked to the ongoing confronta- tion between Russia and the West. Specifically, the article focuses on two particular cases: Syria and Ukraine. The article explores the commonalities of the resulting migration flows to the EU and proposes policy recommendations for reducing the negative impact of such events in the future. Keywords: migration, hybrid warfare, security, European Union, Ukraine, Syria 1. Introduction During the 2015 European migration crisis, an unusually large number of refugees flowed into the European Union. During the past decade, the number of first-time asylum applications submitted by non-EU citizens has increased exponentially, peaking in 2015–2016 when more than a million people from non-EU countries applied for asylum in the EU over the course of just one year (Figure 1(a)).
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategy for Success in Libya
    A Strategy for Success in Libya Emily Estelle NOVEMBER 2017 A Strategy for Success in Libya Emily Estelle NOVEMBER 2017 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE © 2017 by the American Enterprise Institute. All rights reserved. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, 501(c)(3) educational organization and does not take institutional positions on any issues. The views expressed here are those of the author(s). Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................1 Why the US Must Act in Libya Now ............................................................................................................................1 Wrong Problem, Wrong Strategy ............................................................................................................................... 2 What to Do ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Reframing US Policy in Libya .................................................................................................. 5 America’s Opportunity in Libya ................................................................................................................................. 6 The US Approach in Libya ............................................................................................................................................ 6 The Current Situation
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Detention: the Intervention of the European Court of Human Rights in the Detention of Involuntary Migrants
    DEFINING DETENTION: THE INTERVENTION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE DETENTION OF INVOLUNTARY MIGRANTS Anita Sinha* ABSTRACT This Article examines the European Court of Human Rights’ intervention in the detention of involuntary migrants. It analyzes the use of “carceral migration control” in response to a migration “crisis,” and argues that the actual crisis in the region is one of politics and policies rather than the magnitude of migration. It explores the consequences of a crisis moniker for migration, including shortsighted migration policies, entrenched caricatures of migrants as threatening, and excessive emphasis on punitive rather than humanitarian responses. Responding to migration as a crisis has led states in Europe and elsewhere to shift the movement of people across national borders from a human security issue—protecting people and providing assistance—to a national security issue. This Article applies the migration crisis framework to analyze the European states’ responses to the most recent rise in involuntary migration to the region. It examines the foundational principles of the * Assistant Professor of Law and Director, the International Human Rights Law Clinic, American University Washington College of Law (WCL). The author thanks the participants of the Southeastern Association of Law Schools’ New Scholars Workshop and the NYU Clinical Law Review Writers’ Workshop, Susan Bennett, Janie Chuang, Jennifer Koh, Fernanda Nicola, and Scott Rempell for their immensely helpful feedback. I am also grateful for the excellent research assistance of WCL students Alyssa Dunbar, Matthew Reiter, and Kathryn Steffy, as well as WCL Dean Camille A. Nelson for her ongoing generous support for junior faculty scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Sõjateadlane
    SÕJATEADLANE Estonian Journal of Military Studies 13 / 2019 CULTURAL, PEACE AND CONFLICT STUDIES SERIES Volume I Religion and Politics in Multicultural Europe: Perspectives and Challenges Edited by Alar Kilp and Andres Saumets Volume II Extremism Within and Around Us Edited by Alar Kilp and Andres Saumets Volume III The Law of Armed Conflict: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Edited by Rain Liivoja and Andres Saumets Volume IV Sõna sõjast ja sõda sõnast. Tekste ja tõlgendusi War of Words, Words of War. Texts and Interpretations Edited by Andres Saumets and Vladimir Sazonov Volume V Operatsioon “Iraagi vabadus”: kümme aastat hiljem Operation “Iraqi Freedom”: Ten Years Later Edited by Andres Saumets, Holger Mölder and René Värk Volume VI The Crisis in Ukraine and Information Operations of the Russian Federation Edited by Vladimir Sazonov, Andres Saumets and Holger Mölder Volume VII Kümme aastat Vene-Georgia 2008. aasta sõjast: peegeldusi hübriidsõjast ja Venemaa poliiti- listest ambitsioonidest Ten Years after the Russo-Georgian War of 2008: Reflections on Hybrid Warfare and Russia’s Political Ambitions Edited by Karl Salum and Andres Saumets Volume VIII Zapad 2017 infosõja vaatepunktist Zapad 2017 from the Perspective of Information Warfare Edited by Andreas Ventsel, Vladimir Sazonov and Andres Saumets Volume IX Russia, Syria and the West: From the Aftermath of the Arab Spring in the Middle East to Radicalization and Immigration Issues in Europe Edited by Vladimir Sazonov, Illimar Ploom and Andres Saumets ESTONIAN MILITARY ACADEMY
    [Show full text]
  • “Jungle”: Mi- Grant Relocation and Extreme Voting in France Paul Vertier, Max Viskanic
    6927 2018 February 2018 Dismantling the “Jungle”: Mi- grant Relocation and Extreme Voting in France Paul Vertier, Max Viskanic Impressum: CESifo Working Papers ISSN 2364‐1428 (electronic version) Publisher and distributor: Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo GmbH The international platform of Ludwigs‐Maximilians University’s Center for Economic Studies and the ifo Institute Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 Munich, Germany Telephone +49 (0)89 2180‐2740, Telefax +49 (0)89 2180‐17845, email [email protected] Editors: Clemens Fuest, Oliver Falck, Jasmin Gröschl www.cesifo‐group.org/wp An electronic version of the paper may be downloaded ∙ from the SSRN website: www.SSRN.com ∙ from the RePEc website: www.RePEc.org ∙ from the CESifo website: www.CESifo‐group.org/wp CESifo Working Paper No. 6927 Category 2: Public Choice Dismantling the “Jungle”: Migrant Relocation and Extreme Voting in France Abstract Can a small scale inflow of migrants affect electoral outcomes? We study whether the relocation of migrants from the Calais “Jungle” to temporary migrant-centers (CAOs) in France affected the results of the 2017 presidential election. Using an instrumental variables approach that relies on the size of holiday villages present in municipalities, we find that the presence of a CAO reduced the vote share increase of the far-right party (Front National) by about 15.7 percent. These effects, which dissipate spatially and depend on city characteristics and on the size of the inflow, point towards the contact hypothesis (Allport (1954)).
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Assessment: European Migrant Crisis
    thepeacexchange.org Conflict Assessment: European Migrant Crisis ABOUT THE AUTHOR REPORT SUMMARY ABOUT THE AUTHOR Sera Jones is the head researcher at This report focuses on the complex issues that the Alex Klein is an assistant researcher at PeaceXChange. PeaceXchange. She is in the process of systemic governing body of Europe faces, due to He has obtained a B.A. in political science and history earning a B.A. in international studies mass migration from conflict regions in the Middle at Colorado State University (2017) and is pursuing a and a M.A. in political science at East and Africa. Also, the underlying conditions M.A. in political science at The University of Colorado Colorado University of Denver. Her found in the lack of opportunity for newly arriving Denver. His studies involve general histories and research thus, fair has mainly focused migrants, identity struggles for European citizens, international relations, as well as conflict resolution on activism, resistance and social and the role that the media plays in public and peacebuilding. justice, as well as conflict resolution perception. The European Union and its Member and peacebuilding. States are challenged with a tug-of-war scenario ABOUT PEACEXCHANGE between frustrated asylum seekers and citizens ABOUT PEACEXCHANGE Peace-X-Change was designed to give who disagree with the methods in which their PeaceXchange is a multi-dimensional platform that students and academics studying government handles immigration. aims to bring young people to the forefront of international affairs easy access to peacebuilding. Our detailed reports are designed to be accessible to a wide audience and inspire critical resources relating to global conflicts Peace Report 4 Jan 2021 and international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION THE INTEGRATION OF REFUGEES INTO THE WORKFORCES OF SWEDEN, GERMANY, AND POLAND FOLLOWING THE 2015 MIGRANT CRISIS MARY KATHLEEN MORAN SPRING 2019 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Management with honors in Management Reviewed and approved* by the following: Maurie Kelly Professor of International Business Thesis Supervisor Srikanth Paruchuri Professor of Management and Organization Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT The 2015 European Migrant Crisis saw unprecedented numbers of Syrians, Iraqis, and Afghans seeking asylum within the European Union. While the EU governance sought to institute quotas that would help to better distribute this population across member nations, national governments and populaces were largely left to develop their own responses to the crisis. These responses varied sharply in accordance not only with pre-existing governmental stances but also with shifts in public opinion. Sweden and Germany, representing left and centrist national perspectives, respectively, exceeded their quotas and initially led with open- door policies. Other nations, including Poland, one of the rightmost EU nations, were assigned enormous quotas but ultimately took on less than 1 refugee per thousand people. This left an overwhelmingly young, male, and Muslim population to be extremely unevenly distributed across an aging and largely Christian European Union, which in turn left many European national governments, workplaces, and populaces to grapple with the integration of migrants into their economies and labor forces. The rise of far-right politics, the inconsistency of responses across the European Union, the aging of European populations, and the cultural divisions between migrant and native populations all played roles in determining the ability and willingness of nations to integrate these migrants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Migration Crisis and the European Union: the Effects of the Syrian Refugee Crisis to the European Union
    The Migration Crisis and the European Union: The Effects of the Syrian Refugee Crisis to the European Union Diane Faie O. Valenzuela 2014-05015 Political Science 172, MHB Professor Carl Marc Ramota Abstract In this paper, I will be discussing about the Syrian refugee crisis in the European Union. The Syrian refugee crisis, which is currently being experienced in European countries is said to be the one of the largest forced migrations since World War II. More and more refugees are heading towards European countries which are renowned to have good living conditions despite the perilous journey wherein thousands have died and face very inhumane conditions in getting to their destination. Because of this, the European Union has begun to undergo measures to help control the influx of refugees, most of which are at the cost of these refugees' safety. Keywords: Syrian Refugees, Migration Crisis, European Countries, European Union, Syrian Civil War The Syrian Conflict In February 2011, there were protests which erupted in the Southern city of Dar’a as a response to the apprehension of 15 middle school aged boys who had spray painted the common Arab slogan of the protests which bears pro-democracy slogans, wanting the ouster of the Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad (Abboud, 2016). The protests at first simply wanted the Government to release the boys including political prisoners, but later began to evolve towards anti-regime tones which targeted the emergency laws, poor socio economic conditions, corruption, police brutality, and indiscriminate detention (Abboud, 2016). Dar’a began to experience the first protests of the Syrian uprising which was then called ‘Day of Anger’ on February 17, 2011 (Abboud, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Countering Russian and Assad Regime Responses to Safe Zones by Anna Borshchevskaya
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2561 Countering Russian and Assad Regime Responses to Safe Zones by Anna Borshchevskaya Feb 17, 2016 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Anna Borshchevskaya Anna Borshchevskaya is a senior fellow at The Washington Institute, focusing on Russia's policy toward the Middle East. Brief Analysis For such zones to succeed, they must be backed with militarily enforced no-fly zones and a persuasive response to Moscow's inevitable small-scale violations and disinformation campaign. T his piece is part of a TWI series on Syrian safe havens/zones. On February 13, Russian prime minister Dmitry Medvedev said in Munich that Russia has no intention of ending its bombing campaign against the Syrian rebels. "They are all bandits and terrorists," he told Time in an exclusive interview. Earlier, on February 11, Russia's deputy foreign minister, Oleg Syromolotov, informed the Interfax news agency that the Kremlin will consider any attempts by the U.S.-led coalition to establish safe zones on the Turkish- Syrian border without United Nations authorization and Syrian president Bashar al-Assad's permission "an act of direct military intervention." This statement came as no surprise. For well over a decade, the Russian government has advanced a narrative that the West orchestrates regime change under the guise of humanitarian aims. In Syria, Russian president Vladimir Putin will interpret any attempts to create safe or similar zones as a pretext for regime change targeting what he calls the legitimate government of Assad, who this week declared his forces would "eventually" retake all of Syrian territory.
    [Show full text]
  • RSCAS 2017/28 Islamic Terrorism in the West and International Migrations
    RSCAS 2017/28 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Islamic Terrorism in the West and International Migrations: The “Far” or “Near” Enemy Within? What is the Evidence Maria do Céu Pinto Arena European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Islamic Terrorism in the West and International Migrations: The “Far” or “Near” Enemy Within? What is the Evidence Maria do Céu Pinto Arena EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2017/28 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper, or other series, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © Maria do Céu Pinto Arena, 2017 Printed in Italy, May 2017 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), created in 1992 and directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research and to promote work on the major issues facing the process of integration and European society. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes and projects, and a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration and the expanding membership of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, Transnational Crime and Terrorism: Exploring the Nexus in Europe and Southeast Asia by Cameron Sumpter and Joseph Franco
    PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 12, Issue 5 Migration, Transnational Crime and Terrorism: Exploring the Nexus in Europe and Southeast Asia by Cameron Sumpter and Joseph Franco Abstract Theories of a crime-terror nexus are well established in the literature. Often conceptualised along a continuum, relationships between organisations range from contracting services and the appropriation of tactics, to complete mergers or even role changes. Recent irregular migrant movements have added to the nexus, providing financial opportunities to criminal enterprises and creating grievances and heated debate that has fuelled the anger of ideological groups. In Europe, terrorist organisations have worked with and sometimes emulated organised crime syndicates through involvement in the trafficking of drugs, people, weapons and antiquities. In Southeast Asia, conflict areas provide the backdrop for cross-border drug trafficking and kidnap-for-ransom activities, while extremist groups both commit crimes for profit and target criminals for recruitment. Keywords: Crime-Terror nexus, organised crime, terrorism, migration, Europe, Southeast Asia Introduction Links between criminality and violent ideological groups have existed for decades. Hezbollah has been active in Latin America since the 1980s, when it began working with drug cartels to raise funds for operations and the purchase of arms.[1] The organised-crime-plagued Paraguayan city of Ciudad del Este near the border with Brazil and Argentina has long played host to Islamist groups such as the Egyptian
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Control As a Tool in Foreign Policy
    UNIVERSITY OF SARAJEVO FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND DIPLOMACY MIGRATION CONTROL AS A TOOL IN FOREIGN POLICY - Master Thesis - Candidate Mentor Gluhalić Melisa Prof.dr. Damir Kapidžić Index number: 1034/p Sarajevo, April 2021 UNIVERSITY OF SARAJEVO FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND DIPLOMACY MIGRATION CONTROL AS A TOOL IN FOREIGN POLICY - Master Thesis – Candidate Mentor Gluhalić Melisa Prof.dr. Damir Kapidžić Index number: 1034/p Sarajevo, April 2021 Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................... 6 1.1 RESEARCH TOPIC .................................................................................................... 6 1.2 RESEARCH QUESTION ........................................................................................... 7 1.3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................ 7 1.4 HYPOTHESIS FORMULATION ............................................................................... 9 1.4.1 General hypothesis ............................................................................................... 9 1.4.2 Auxiliary hypotheses
    [Show full text]