Eriss Research Summary 2013-2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eriss Research Summary 2013-2014 supervising scientist report 209 eriss research summary 2013–2014 Supervising Scientist It is Supervising Scientist policy for reports in the SSR series to be reviewed as part of the publications process. This Supervising Scientist Report is a summary of the 2013-14 research programme of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist and, although not externally peer-reviewed, it has been reviewed internally by senior staff. Editor Supervising Scientist – Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: Supervising Scientist 2015. eriss research summary 2013-2014. Supervising Scientist Report 209, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT. Example of citing a paper in this report: Turner K & Marshall S 2015. Investigation of water quality in the Gulungul Creek catchment to the west of Ranger’s tailings storage facility. In eriss research summary 2013-2014. Supervising Scientist Report 209, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT, 3-26. Supervising Scientist is a branch of the Australian Government Department of the Environment © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2015. SSR209 is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ ISSN-2203-4781 (online) ISBN 978-1-921069-28-4 Internet: http://www.environment.gov.au/science/supervising-scientist/publications The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Contents Preface vii Maps x Part 1: Ranger – Current operations KKN 1.2: Ongoing operational issues Investigation of water quality in the Gulungul Creek catchment to the west of Ranger’s tailings storage facility 3 Toxicity of ammonia to local freshwater biota 26 The sensitivity of Moinodaphnia macleayi to uranium 34 The toxicity of uranium to sediment biota of Magela Creek backflow billabong environments 44 The effect of uranium on the structure and function of bacterial sediment communities 54 Reference toxicity testing for routine toxicity test species 59 KKN 1.3: Monitoring Results of the stream monitoring programme in Magela Creek and Gulungul Creek catchments, 2013–14 69 Surface water quality monitoring: Ranger 71 In situ toxicity monitoring in Magela and Gulungul Creeks (routine monitoring) 91 Bioaccumulation in freshwater mussels and fish 95 Monitoring using macroinvertebrate community structure 100 Monitoring using fish community structure 106 Monitoring of radionuclides and metals in groundwater at Ranger 109 Atmospheric radioactivity monitoring in the vicinity of the Ranger mine 117 Environmental factors associated with toxicity monitoring in Magela and Gulungul Creeks 123 iv Part 2: Ranger – Rehabilitation KKN 2.2: Landform design Sediment losses from the trial landform 131 A multi-year assessment of landform evolution model predictions for a trial rehabilitated landform 141 Use of slackwater deposits and other forms of geologic evidence to determine the number, magnitude and frequency of palaeofloods in the Alligator Rivers Region 147 Sediment movement in Magela Creek Catchment 154 Radon exhalation from a rehabilitated landform 156 Radionuclide fluxes from the Ranger Trial Landform 160 KKN 2.5: Ecosystem establishment Developing water quality closure criteria for Ranger billabongs using macroinvertebrate community data 166 Development of turbidity closure criteria for receiving surface waters following Ranger minesite rehabilitation 181 Aquatic ecosystem establishment 187 Ranger revegetation 191 Post-rehabilitation radiation exposure due to Aboriginal bush foods from terrestrial ecosystems 199 A catalogue of traditional plant foods in Kakadu National Park 206 Environmental media concentration limits for terrestrial wildlife 213 KKN 2.6: Monitoring Developing monitoring methods using an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS): Jabiluka revegetation 222 Remote sensing analysis of the inter-annual variation of Magela Creek floodplain vegetation: 2010–2013 229 v KKN 2.7: Risk Assessment Rehabilitation and closure ecological risk assessment for the Ranger uranium mine: Identification and incorporation of key ecological processes 242 Part 3: Jabiluka Surface Water Quality Monitoring: Jabiluka 246 Sediment movement off the rehabilitated Jabiluka minesite 248 Appendix 1 Supervisng Scientist publications and presentations for December 2013 to July 2014 258 Appendix 2 List of inactive,delayed or other projects for which summaries are not provided in this report 263 Appendix 3 Alligator Rivers Region Technical Committee Key Knowledge Needs 2008–2010: Uranium mining in the Alligator Rivers Region 264 vi Preface The Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) is part of the Supervising Scientist Division (SSD) of the Australian Government’s Department of the Environment (DoE). eriss provides specialist technical advice to the Supervising Scientist on the protection of the environment and people of the Alligator Rivers Region (ARR) from the impact of uranium mining. Its major function is to conduct research into developing leading practice methodologies for monitoring and assessing the impact of uranium (U) mining on water and air (transport pathways) and soil, and on the bushfoods that are consumed by the local Indigenous people. This research spans the operational, decommissioning and post-rehabilitation phases of mining. eriss also applies its expertise to conducting research into the sustainable use and environmental protection of tropical rivers and their associated wetlands, and to undertaking a limited programme of contract research on the impacts of mining elsewhere in the north Australian tropics. The balance and strategic prioritisation of work within the uranium component of eriss’ project portfolio are defined by Key Knowledge Needs (KKNs) developed through consultation between the Alligator Rivers Region Technical Committee (see ARRTC membership and function in Appendix 2), the Supervising Scientist, Energy Resources of Australia Ltd (ERA) and other stakeholders. The KKNs are subject to ongoing review by ARRTC to ensure their currency in the context of any significant changes that may have occurred in U mining related activities and issues in the ARR. Not all of the KKN research areas (Appendix 3) are able to be covered by eriss, since not all of the required disciplines are available within the Institute. To address these particular gaps, collaborative projects are conducted between eriss and researchers from other organisations, and consultants are commissioned by eriss and others to undertake specific pieces of work. For example, KKN projects related to detailed hydrogeology or tailings management on the Ranger lease are conducted and reported separately by consultants engaged by ERA. A more complete picture of the scope of research work that is conducted by all parties can be obtained by referring to the minutes that are produced for the meetings of ARRTC: www.environment.gov.au/ssd/communication /committees/arrtc/meeting.html. This report documents the monitoring and research projects undertaken by eriss over the 2013–14 financial year (1.7.13 to 30.6.14). Most of the work presented in the report was also presented to ARRTC at its 33rd Meeting in November 2014. Where possible, papers have been updated following significant feedback from ARRTC, although this may not be the case for all papers. The report is structured according to the five major topic areas in the KKN framework, noting that this year there are no papers for the last two topics. 1. Ranger – current operations 2. Ranger – rehabilitation 3. Jabiluka 4. Nabarlek 5. General Alligators Rivers Region vii Not all of the projects in eriss’ KKN project suite have been reported on since; for reasons of staff resourcing or other demands in the context of absolute project priority, no substantive work may have been done on a particular project during the past year. A list of those projects that have not been reported on, and a summary of the reasons for the reduced activity, is provided in Appendix 2. Much of the monitoring and research work conducted by eriss is focused on the wet season and its immediate aftermath, since it is during this period that the environment is potentially at most risk from past and current uranium mining activities. The 2013–14 wet season was well above average with a total of rainfall at Jabiru Airport of 1963 mm (annual average 1536 mm). During 2013–14, progress of the research programme was again limited by budget constraints making additional/new recruitment difficult. However, the opportunity during the third quarter to recruit several short-term (3 month) non-ongoing contracts in the Revegetation and Landscape Ecology (RLE) programme and Hydrologic, Geomorphic and Chemical Processes (HGCP) programme, and retain existing
Recommended publications
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • II. a Cladistic Analysis of Rbcl Sequences and Morphology
    Systematic Botany (2003), 28(2): pp. 270±292 q Copyright 2003 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogenetic Relationships in the Commelinaceae: II. A Cladistic Analysis of rbcL Sequences and Morphology TIMOTHY M. EVANS,1,3 KENNETH J. SYTSMA,1 ROBERT B. FADEN,2 and THOMAS J. GIVNISH1 1Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706; 2Department of Systematic Biology-Botany, MRC 166, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012; 3Present address, author for correspondence: Department of Biology, Hope College, 35 East 12th Street, Holland, Michigan 49423-9000 ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: John V. Freudenstein ABSTRACT. The chloroplast-encoded gene rbcL was sequenced in 30 genera of Commelinaceae to evaluate intergeneric relationships within the family. The Australian Cartonema was consistently placed as sister to the rest of the family. The Commelineae is monophyletic, while the monophyly of Tradescantieae is in question, due to the position of Palisota as sister to all other Tradescantieae plus Commelineae. The phylogeny supports the most recent classi®cation of the family with monophyletic tribes Tradescantieae (minus Palisota) and Commelineae, but is highly incongruent with a morphology-based phylogeny. This incongruence is attributed to convergent evolution of morphological characters associated with pollination strategies, especially those of the androecium and in¯orescence. Analysis of the combined data sets produced a phylogeny similar to the rbcL phylogeny. The combined analysis differed from the molecular one, however, in supporting the monophyly of Dichorisandrinae. The family appears to have arisen in the Old World, with one or possibly two movements to the New World in the Tradescantieae, and two (or possibly one) subsequent movements back to the Old World; the latter are required to account for the Old World distribution of Coleotrypinae and Cyanotinae, which are nested within a New World clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembling the Tree of the Monocotyledons: Plastome Sequence Phylogeny and Evolution of Poales Author(S) :Thomas J
    Assembling the Tree of the Monocotyledons: Plastome Sequence Phylogeny and Evolution of Poales Author(s) :Thomas J. Givnish, Mercedes Ames, Joel R. McNeal, Michael R. McKain, P. Roxanne Steele, Claude W. dePamphilis, Sean W. Graham, J. Chris Pires, Dennis W. Stevenson, Wendy B. Zomlefer, Barbara G. Briggs, Melvin R. Duvall, Michael J. Moore, J. Michael Heaney, Douglas E. Soltis, Pamela S. Soltis, Kevin Thiele, and James H. Leebens-Mack Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 97(4):584-616. 2010. Published By: Missouri Botanical Garden DOI: URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3417/2010023 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/ page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. ASSEMBLING THE TREE OF THE Thomas J. Givnish,2 Mercedes Ames,2 Joel R. MONOCOTYLEDONS: PLASTOME McNeal,3 Michael R. McKain,3 P. Roxanne Steele,4 Claude W. dePamphilis,5 Sean W.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene Ndhf Thomas J
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 4 2006 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Thomas J. Givnish University of Wisconsin-Madison J. Chris Pires University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Missouri Sean W. Graham University of British Columbia Marc A. McPherson University of Alberta; Duke University Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Gardens See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Givnish, Thomas J.; Pires, J. Chris; Graham, Sean W.; McPherson, Marc A.; Prince, Linda M.; Patterson, Thomas B.; Rai, Hardeep S.; Roalson, Eric H.; Evans, Timothy M.; Hahn, William J.; Millam, Kendra C.; Meerow, Alan W.; Molvray, Mia; Kores, Paul J.; O'Brien, Heath W.; Hall, Jocelyn C.; Kress, W. John; and Sytsma, Kenneth J. (2006) "Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/4 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Authors Thomas J. Givnish, J. Chris Pires, Sean W. Graham, Marc A. McPherson, Linda M. Prince, Thomas B. Patterson, Hardeep S. Rai, Eric H. Roalson, Timothy M. Evans, William J. Hahn, Kendra C. Millam, Alan W. Meerow, Mia Molvray, Paul J. Kores, Heath W. O'Brien, Jocelyn C. Hall, W. John Kress, and Kenneth J. Sytsma This article is available in Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/ 4 Aliso 22, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Plastome Phylogeny Monocots SI Tables
    Givnish et al. – American Journal of Botany – Appendix S2. Taxa included in the across- monocots study and sources of sequence data. Sources not included in the main bibliography are listed at the foot of this table. Order Famiy Species Authority Source Acorales Acoraceae Acorus americanus (Raf.) Raf. Leebens-Mack et al. 2005 Acorus calamus L. Goremykin et al. 2005 Alismatales Alismataceae Alisma triviale Pursh Ross et al. 2016 Astonia australiensis (Aston) S.W.L.Jacobs Ross et al. 2016 Baldellia ranunculoides (L.) Parl. Ross et al. 2016 Butomopsis latifolia (D.Don) Kunth Ross et al. 2016 Caldesia oligococca (F.Muell.) Buchanan Ross et al. 2016 Damasonium minus (R.Br.) Buchenau Ross et al. 2016 Echinodorus amazonicus Rataj Ross et al. 2016 (Rusby) Lehtonen & Helanthium bolivianum Myllys Ross et al. 2016 (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Hydrocleys nymphoides Willd.) Buchenau Ross et al. 2016 Limnocharis flava (L.) Buchenau Ross et al. 2016 Luronium natans Raf. Ross et al. 2016 (Rich. ex Kunth) Ranalisma humile Hutch. Ross et al. 2016 Sagittaria latifolia Willd. Ross et al. 2016 Wiesneria triandra (Dalzell) Micheli Ross et al. 2016 Aponogetonaceae Aponogeton distachyos L.f. Ross et al. 2016 Araceae Aglaonema costatum N.E.Br. Henriquez et al. 2014 Aglaonema modestum Schott ex Engl. Henriquez et al. 2014 Aglaonema nitidum (Jack) Kunth Henriquez et al. 2014 Alocasia fornicata (Roxb.) Schott Henriquez et al. 2014 (K.Koch & C.D.Bouché) K.Koch Alocasia navicularis & C.D.Bouché Henriquez et al. 2014 Amorphophallus titanum (Becc.) Becc. Henriquez et al. 2014 Anchomanes hookeri (Kunth) Schott Henriquez et al. 2014 Anthurium huixtlense Matuda Henriquez et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Details/Summary/ 197892/0]
    2017 LanguaL proposals from Australian NUTTAB2010 The Australian NUTTAB2010 data set includes 484 indigenous foods, which presents is a particular challenge for LanguaL indexing, as most of these plants and animals are absent from facet B of the thesaurus. 1. ANIMAL USED AS FOOD SOURCE Proposals for new animal food sources in facet B are pretty straightforward. ANIMAL USED AS FOOD SOURCE> ANIMAL (MAMMAL) [B1134] BT proposed AI synonyms NUTTAB2010 proposed descriptor ANIMAL POSSUM Phalangeriformes, or possums, any of a number brushtail Trichosurus (MAMMAL) of arboreal marsupial species native to possum, arnhemensis, [B1134] Australia, New Guinea, and Sulawesi: trichosuru northern - Phalangeridae (possums and cuscuses), a s, brushtail family of mammals native to Australia and New pseudoch possum, flesh Guinea containing most of the species referred eirus, cooked; to as "possums" in Australia phalanger Northern - Common brushtail possum (Trichosurus idae Brushtail vulpecula), a common possum in Australian Possum urban areas, invasive in New Zealand [15A20119] - Common ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus Trichosurus peregrinus), also common in Australian urban arnhemensis, areas, absent from New Zealand northern [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possum] brushtail possum, kidney cooked; Northern Brushtail Possum [15A20120] Trichosurus arnhemensis, northern brushtail possum, liver cooked; Northern Brushtail Possum [15A20121] MARINE SEA COW <SCINAM>Sirenia Illiger, 1811 [ITIS 180676] sirenia, Dugong MAMMAL sirens [B1122] Sirenia, commonly referred to
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Size Dynamics and Evolution in Monocots
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Botany Volume 2010, Article ID 862516, 18 pages doi:10.1155/2010/862516 Review Article Genome Size Dynamics and Evolution in Monocots Ilia J. Leitch,1 Jeremy M. Beaulieu,2 Mark W. Chase,1 Andrew R. Leitch,3 and Michael F. Fay1 1 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AD, UK 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA 3 School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, E1 4NS, UK Correspondence should be addressed to Ilia J. Leitch, [email protected] Received 7 January 2010; Accepted 8 March 2010 Academic Editor: Johann Greilhuber Copyright © 2010 Ilia J. Leitch et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Monocot genomic diversity includes striking variation at many levels. This paper compares various genomic characters (e.g., range of chromosome numbers and ploidy levels, occurrence of endopolyploidy, GC content, chromosome packaging and organization, genome size) between monocots and the remaining angiosperms to discern just how distinctive monocot genomes are. One of the most notable features of monocots is their wide range and diversity of genome sizes, including the species with the largest genome so far reported in plants. This genomic character is analysed in greater detail, within a phylogenetic context. By surveying available genome size and chromosome data it is apparent that different monocot orders follow distinctive modes of genome size and chromosome evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships in the Commelinaceae: I
    Systematic Botany (2000), 25(4): pp. 668±691 q Copyright 2000 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogenetic Relationships in the Commelinaceae: I. A Cladistic Analysis of Morphological Data TIMOTHY M. EVANS1 Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 1Present address, author for correspondence: Department of Biology, Hope College, 35 East 12th Street, Holland, Michigan 49423-9000 ROBERT B. FADEN Department of Botany, NHB 166, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 MICHAEL G. SIMPSON Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182 KENNETH J. SYTSMA Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Communicating Editor: Richard Jensen ABSTRACT. The plant family Commelinaceae displays a wide range of variation in vegetative, ¯oral, and in¯orescence morphology. This high degree of variation, particularly among characters operating under strong and similar selective pressures (i.e., ¯owers), has made the assessment of homology among morpho- logical characters dif®cult, and has resulted in several discordant classi®cation schemes for the family. Phy- logenetic relationships among 40 of the 41 genera in the family were evaluated using cladistic analyses of morphological data. The resulting phylogeny shows some similarity to the most recent classi®cation, but with some notable differences. Cartonema (subfamily Cartonematoideae) was placed basal to the rest of the family. Triceratella (subfamily Cartonematoideae), however, was placed among genera within tribe Tradescantieae of subfamily Commelinoideae. Likewise, the circumscriptions of tribes Commelineae and Tradescantieae were in disagreement with the most recent classi®cation. The discordance between the phylogeny and the most recent classi®cation is attributed to a high degree of convergence in various morphological characters, par- ticularly those relating to the androecium and the in¯orescence.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Botany 25
    Phylogenetic Relationships in the Commelinaceae: I. A. Cladistic Analysis of Morphological Data Author(s): Timothy M. Evans, Robert B. Faden, Michael G. Simpson, Kenneth J. Sytsma Source: Systematic Botany, Vol. 25, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 2000), pp. 668-691 Published by: American Society of Plant Taxonomists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2666727 Accessed: 10/09/2010 13:35 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aspt. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Society of Plant Taxonomists is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Systematic Botany.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics, Divergence Times and Diversification from Three Genomic
    bs_bs_banner Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 178, 375–393. With 6 figures Phylogenetics, divergence times and diversification from three genomic partitions in monocots KATE L. HERTWECK1,2*, MICHAEL S. KINNEY3, STEPHANIE A. STUART4, OLIVIER MAURIN5, SARAH MATHEWS6, MARK W. CHASE7, MARIA A. GANDOLFO8 and J. CHRIS PIRES3 1National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent), 2024 West Main Street Suite A200, Durham, NC 27705, USA 2Division of Biological Sciences, 311 Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, 1201 Rollins Street, Columbia, MO 65211, USA 3Biology Department, University of La Verne, 1950 Third Street, La Verne, CA 91750, USA 4Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 5Molecular Systematics Laboratory, African Centre for DNA barcoding (ACDB), Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, APK Campus, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa 6Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 7Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK 8LH Bailey Hortorium, Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, 410 Mann Library Building, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Received 14 February 2014; revised 6 June 2014; accepted for publication 6 January 2015 Resolution of evolutionary relationships among some monocot orders remains problematic despite the application of various taxon and molecular locus sampling strategies. In this study we sequenced and analysed a fragment of the low-copy, nuclear phytochrome C (PHYC) gene and combined these data with a previous multigene data set (four plastid, one mitochondrial, two nuclear ribosomal loci) to determine if adding this marker improved resolution and support of relationships among major lineages of monocots.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflower Society of Western Australia Newsletter
    Wildfower Society of Western Australia Newsletter Australian Native Plants Society (Australia), W. A. Region February 2017 Vol. 55 No. 1 Price $4.00 Published quarterly. Registered by Australia Post. Publication No. 639699-00049 Ask for our seed packets at garden centres, nurseries, botanic gardens and souvenir shops or visit our website to see our range and extensive growing advice. Many Australian native plants require smoke to germinate their seeds. Our Wildflower Seed Starter granules are impregnated with smoke. Simple instructions on the packet. Suitable for all our packaged seed. Safe to handle. Phone: (08) 9470 6996 wildflowersofaustralia.com.au Wildfower Society of WA Newsletter, February, 2017 1 WILDFLOWER SOCIETY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Contents The newsletter is published quarterly in February, May, August and November by From the President 3 the Wildfower Society of WA (Inc). Miss Kathleen (Kath) Napier 4 Editor Committee convener and layout: Educaton 6 Bronwen Keighery Conservaton 6 Mail: PO Box 519 Floreat 6014 On Eucalypts and two books 7 E-mail: [email protected] Society 2017 AGM Notce of Motons 8 Deadline for the May issue is 5 April 2017. Call Nominatons Society Awards 2017 9 Articles are the copyright of their authors. A Banksia Study Group? 10 In most cases permission to reprint articles Anne Bellman Volunteer Award 10 in not-for-proft publications can be Branch Contacts and Meetng Details 12 obtained from the author without charge, Armadale Branch 13 on request. Eastern Hills Branch 15 The views and opinions expressed in the Murdoch Branch 17 articles in this Newsletter are those of the Northern Suburbs Branch 18 authors and do not necessarily refect those Perth Branch 19 of the Wildfower Society of WA (Inc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Phylogeny of Tradescantia L
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 89: 11–72 (2017)Phylogeny and new infrageneric classification for Tradescantia 11 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.89.20388 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Morphological phylogeny of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) sheds light on a new infrageneric classification for the genus and novelties on the systematics of subtribe Tradescantiinae Marco O. O. Pellegrini1,2,3 1 Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Botânica, Rua do Matão 277, CEP 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leão 915, CEP 22460-030, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 3 Current address: Smithsonian Institution, NMNH, Department of Botany, MRC 166, P.O. Box 37012, Washington D.C. 20013-7012, USA Corresponding author: Marco O. O. Pellegrini ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Boyce | Received 17 August 2017 | Accepted 15 October 2017 | Published 26 October 2017 Citation: Pellegrini MOO (2017) Morphological phylogeny of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) sheds light on a new infrageneric classification for the genus and novelties on the systematics of subtribe Tradescantiinae. PhytoKeys 89: 11–72. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.89.20388 Abstract Throughout the years, three infrageneric classifications were proposed for Tradescantia along with several informal groups and species complexes. The current infrageneric classification accepts 12 sections – with T. sect. Tradescantia being further divided into four series – and assimilates many concepts adopted by pre- vious authors. Recent molecular-based phylogenetic studies indicate that the currently accepted sections might not represent monophyletic groups within Tradescantia. Based on newly gathered morphological data on the group, complemented with available micromorphological, cytological and phytochemical data, I present the first morphology-based evolutionary hypothesis forTradescantia .
    [Show full text]