Mishkan a Forum on the Gospel and the Jewish People

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mishkan a Forum on the Gospel and the Jewish People Issue 65 / 2010 MISHKAN A Forum on the Gospel and the Jewish People I SSUE 65 / 2010 Editor : Jim R. Sibley Pasche Institute of Jewish Studies · A Ministry of Criswell College Mishkan 65.indb 1 1/13/2011 9:22:25 AM Mishkan issue 65, 2010 Published by Pasche Institute of Jewish Studies, a ministry of Criswell College, in cooperation with Caspari Center for Biblical and Jewish Studies, CJF Ministries, and Finnish Lutheran Mission © 2010 by Pasche Institute of Jewish Studies Editorial Board Jim R. Sibley, Ph.D. (candidate), Editor Olivier Melnick, Editorial Secretary Richard Harvey, Ph.D. Knut Helge Høyland Richard A. Robinson, Ph.D. Michael Rydelnik, D.Miss. Erez Soref, Ph.D. Diana Cooper, Linguistic Editor Cindy Osborne, Asst. Linguistic Editor Board of Reference Craig Blaising, Ph.D., Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Michael L. Brown, Ph.D., FIRE School of Ministry, Concord, North Carolina, USA John Fischer, Ph.D., Th.D., Menorah Ministries, Palm Harbor, Florida, USA Arnold Fruchtenbaum, Ph.D., Ariel Ministries, San Antonio, Texas, USA Ole Chr. M. Kvarme, Bishop, Oslo Diocese, Norway Peter Stuhlmacher, Ph.D., University of Tübingen, Germany International Subscription Agents Danish Israel Mission Finnish Evangelical Lutheran Mission Evangeliumsdienst für Israel Norwegian Church Ministry to Israel Graphic design: Diana Cooper Cover design: Heidi Tohmola Printed by Evangel Press, Nappanee, Indiana, USA ISSN 0792-0474 Subscription Rates One-year print $40; one-year print Israel resident $36; one-year digital $25; one-year combo (print and digital) $50 Subscriptions and back issues: Criswell College 4010 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX 75246 USA www.mishkanstore.org [email protected] Mishkan 65.indb 2 1/13/2011 9:22:26 AM TABLE OF CONTENTS A Word from the Editor 3 Post-Holocaust/Shoah Theology Henri Blocher 5 Jesus and the Land: The New Testament Challenge to “Holy Land” Theology (review) Barry E. Horner 20 An Analysis of Neo-Replacement Theology Michael J. Vlach 28 Rev. James Craig, Irish Presbyterian Missionary to German Jews Nicholas Michael Railton 43 Mishkan is a quarterly journal dedicated to biblical and theological thinking on issues related to Jewish Evangelism, Hebrew-Christian/Messianic-Jewish identity, and Jewish-Christian relations. Mishkan is published by the Pasche Institute of Jewish Studies. Mishkan’s editorial policy is openly evangelical, committed to the New Testament proclamation that the gospel of salvation through faith in Jesus (Yeshua) the Messiah is “to the Jew first.“ Mishkan is a forum for discussion, and articles included do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors, Pasche Institute of Jewish Studies, or Criswell College. Mishkan is the Hebrew word for tabernacle or E D I T O R H E T dwelling place (John 1:14). M O R F D R O W The Legitimacy of A Israel By Jim R. Sibley The State of Israel is under attack. Not merely the government of the State of Israel, or the morality and policies of the State of Israel, but the legiti- macy of its very existence. For those with an interest in the gospel and the Jewish people, this ought to be a matter of grave concern. Politically, the existence of Israel is legitimized by the United Nations’ Partition Plan of 1947, Israel’s Declaration of Independence of 1948, and the recognition of Israel by 154 of 191 UN member nations. Furthermore, it constitutes the only parliamentary democracy in the Middle East. Militarily, the existence of Israel is legitimized by its victories in at least seven wars, beginning with its War of Independence. The wars it has waged either have been purely defensive or have been motivated by the security interests of the nation. Morally, the existence of Israel is legitimized, not only by the long history of persecution of Jews in the Diaspora, but preeminently by the Holocaust. This is the reason some, like Iran’s Ahmadinejad, who deny Israel’s legiti- macy are also compelled to deny the Holocaust. Strictly speaking, the modern State of Israel cannot be legitimized bibli- cally or theologically. It is, after all, a secular state. However, the Bible does speak of the continuing validity of the Jewish people as a nation-in-Diaspo- ra and in covenant with God. So also it speaks of the land of Israel as given to the Jewish people in an unconditional covenant, even when historically they were not permitted to occupy this land. Likewise, Scripture speaks of the re-gathering of the Jewish people in unbelief to the land of Israel prior to their spiritual re-birth (e.g., cf., Ezek 36:24–31). In this issue of Mishkan, the highly esteemed French scholar Henri Blocher leads with a consideration of post-Holocaust theology. This is followed by Mishkan 65.indb 3 1/13/2011 9:22:26 AM 4 an article about the issue of Israel’s claim to the Land. This takes the form of a book review, by Barry Horner, of Gary Burge’s book Jesus and the Land. Horner is the author of Future Israel: Why Christian Anti-Judaism Must Be Challenged. Continuing our theme, Michael Vlach (the author of Has the Church Replaced Israel? A Theological Evaluation) provides us with “An Analysis of Neo-Replacement Theology.” Finally, Nicholas Railton provides a very interesting window into the life of Rev. James Craig, an Irish Presby- terian missionary to German Jews in the nineteenth century. Our prayer is that the articles in this issue would serve to stimulate further thought on these important topics. Mishkan 65.indb 4 1/13/2011 9:22:26 AM Mishkan, no. 65 (2010): 5–19 L S R A E F I O Y C A M I T I G E L E H T Post-Holocaust / Shoah Theology by Henri Blocher Then the Lord answered Job out of the storm (Job 38:1).1 Theology should be nothing else than fides quaerens intellectum. Post-Ho- locaust theology should be the attempt, from the standpoint of Christian faith, to think about the massive extermination of Jews perpetrated by the Nazis in Europe, essentially in the years 1941–45, and its significance and consequences. Though the horror of the crime tends to stupefy our minds and suspicions of Christian responsibilities make us frightfully vulnerable to self-protective temptations, we may not evade the call to take “every thought captive to the obedience of Christ” (2 Cor 10:5, NASB). We do heed Elie Wiesel’s warning: “There can be no theology after Auschwitz, and no theology whatsoever about Auschwitz. One can never understand the event with God; one cannot understand the event without God. Theology? The logos of God? Who am I to explain God?”2 We surely have no intention of “explaining God,” and our goal is not to “understand” the event; but, with our merciful God, under the teaching of His Logos and the guiding as- sistance of His Spirit, we do pray that we shall think in a more wholesome way of the event—rather than darkening His counsel “by words without knowledge.” “Holocaust” is the common designation in English. Prestigious voices, such as Wiesel’s,3 again, have deplored this lexical choice, with the com- ment that a “holocaust” is a sacrifice offered to God—the opposite of the brutal murder of millions of helpless human beings. We may note, however, that “holocaust” may be used of sacrifices to false gods (2 Kgs 1 All Scripture quotations, unless otherwise noted, are from the New International Version. 2 Wiesel’s part in Ekkehard Schuster and Reinhold Boschert-Kimmig, Hope against Hope: Johann Baptist Metz and Elie Wiesel Speak Out on the Holocaust, trans. J. Matthew Ashley (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1999), 93. 3 Especially in his essay “Job ou Dieu dans la tempête” [Job or God in the Storm], accord- ing to Jean-Claude Favez, “Elie Wiesel et la Shoah,” in Présence d’Elie Wiesel, ed. David Banon (Geneva: Labor & Fides, 1990), 70. Wiesel contributed to the spread of the word but later regretted it. Mishkan 65.indb 5 1/13/2011 9:22:26 AM 6 16:13), and the idols of Nazi racism bear a family resemblance to Molech or Chemosh, who also demanded burning children as their daily fare. Two Hebrew words have been introduced as rival designations: /brj (churban) and haw? (shoah). Most often one finds shoah, and I will use this familiar form.4 The former term, meaning “ruin, devastation,” occurred for the de- struction of the first and second temples in Jewish literature and is not very frequent (it does not appear in the Tanakh, but the root is a common one in biblical Hebrew); the latter, meaning “storm, tempest” (Prov 1:27) and then “disaster, calamity” (Isa 47:11) was used by Polish Jews as soon as 1940 for what was beginning to befall them.5 It has become the preferred word on the European continent, definitely so among French-speaking Jews, and HENRI BLOCHER I will follow suit. “Post” in our title carries a nuance. We will not concentrate on a theolo- gy of the Shoah.6 Rather, as we consider the event from a distance, we shall bring into focus interpretations that developed afterward, and we shall be interested in any fruit or effect we can perceive. In a first move, we shall try to locate the Shoah within a biblical framework, to identify some contours of the event, and to find the proper theological perspective. In a second part, we shall draw lessons, reflectively deepening and widening our un- derstanding. Thirdly, we shall look beyond the Shoah, searching for im- port and longer term significance.
Recommended publications
  • The Orthodox Doctrine Regarding the Extent of the Atonement Vindicated
    \ 22.2% 22.2% 22-2222-22 THE ORTHODOX D0CTRINE REGARDING THE EXTENT OF THE ATONEMENT WINDICATED. BY A CHARLES HODGE, D.D., *~~ PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGY IN THE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, PRINCETON, U.S. @@ith a #etommentatorp #refate, BY REV. DR CUNNINGHAM, PROFESSOR M‘CRIE, DR CANDLISH, AND DR. W. SYMINGTON. EDINBURGH: JOHN JOHNSTONE, HUNTER SQUARE. LONDON : R. GROOMBRIDGE AND SONS. MDCCCXLVI. ---------, -, - * ANDREW JACK, PRINTER. --~~ - ~ --- * * --~~*- --- THE EXTENT OF THE MONEMENT. RECOMMENDATORY PREFACE. THE Doctrine of the Atonement stands invested with a character of stupendous interest. Circumstances have tended to direct particular attention of late years to this subject, more especially to the question of the extent of the atonement, -meaning by this, its extent, not in respect of intrinsic worth, but of relative desti nation. The sentiment that the atonement of Christ is, in this latter aspect, universal, which was long re garded as a branch of Arminianism, has found favour in the eyes of some who profess a Calvinistic creed, in consequence, it is alleged, of its being understood to furnish a better basis on which to rest the unlimited offer of the gospel to sinners. This conclusion, we are fully persuaded, is without any solid foundation. The matter has given rise to much discussion. In spite, however, of the keenness with which the controversy has been carried on, attempts have been made to repre sent the point in dispute as a matter of comparative insignificance,—as one, indeed, of those nice specula tive questions on which it may be well enough for professed theologians to sharpen their dialectical powers, but which have no practical bearing, and are consequently of no sort of interest to the great body of private Christians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of John Duncan John S
    The Legacy of John Duncan John S. Ross ohn Duncan was born in 1796 in Old Aberdeen, Scotland, conversion. As a consequence he retained a lifelong dread of J to parents who were members of the Associate Presbytery, superficial Christianity, often entertaining doubts as to the au- or Secession Church. When John was nine years old, he entered thenticity of his own faith. He never enjoyed a permanent sense Aberdeen Grammar School, where from the outset he showed of assurance, and although this experience proved painful for great interest in languages and metaphysics, the two subjects himself and his family, it gave him great empathy for others and that were to be lifelong intellectual passions. He was once discov- unusual depth in his evangelistic ministry. ered, during class, furtively reading a copy of Aristotle hidden Duncan was a man of remarkable intellect. In October 1839 under his desk.1 In 1810 he matriculated and, obtaining a schol- he applied for the chair of Oriental Languages in the University arship, entered Marischal College, Aberdeen, from which he of Glasgow and could claim familiarity with Hebrew and all the graduated with an M.A. in 1814. Despite the evangelical influ- cognate languages, as well as with Sanskrit, Bengali, Hindustani, ences surrounding him, Duncan as a student had espoused the and Marathi; furthermore, he had a high degree of fluency in atheistic pantheism of Baruch Spinoza. He nevertheless became European languages and an amazing facility to express himself a student for the Christian ministry, studying at the theological in the most elegant Latin.
    [Show full text]
  • Who, Where and When: the History & Constitution of the University of Glasgow
    Who, Where and When: The History & Constitution of the University of Glasgow Compiled by Michael Moss, Moira Rankin and Lesley Richmond © University of Glasgow, Michael Moss, Moira Rankin and Lesley Richmond, 2001 Published by University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ Typeset by Media Services, University of Glasgow Printed by 21 Colour, Queenslie Industrial Estate, Glasgow, G33 4DB CIP Data for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 0 85261 734 8 All rights reserved. Contents Introduction 7 A Brief History 9 The University of Glasgow 9 Predecessor Institutions 12 Anderson’s College of Medicine 12 Glasgow Dental Hospital and School 13 Glasgow Veterinary College 13 Queen Margaret College 14 Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama 15 St Andrew’s College of Education 16 St Mungo’s College of Medicine 16 Trinity College 17 The Constitution 19 The Papal Bull 19 The Coat of Arms 22 Management 25 Chancellor 25 Rector 26 Principal and Vice-Chancellor 29 Vice-Principals 31 Dean of Faculties 32 University Court 34 Senatus Academicus 35 Management Group 37 General Council 38 Students’ Representative Council 40 Faculties 43 Arts 43 Biomedical and Life Sciences 44 Computing Science, Mathematics and Statistics 45 Divinity 45 Education 46 Engineering 47 Law and Financial Studies 48 Medicine 49 Physical Sciences 51 Science (1893-2000) 51 Social Sciences 52 Veterinary Medicine 53 History and Constitution Administration 55 Archive Services 55 Bedellus 57 Chaplaincies 58 Hunterian Museum and Art Gallery 60 Library 66 Registry 69 Affiliated Institutions
    [Show full text]
  • Revoluţia În Concepţia Liderilor Politici Români Şi
    DANIEL EDWARD (1815–1896) AND THE FREE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND MISSION TO THE JEWS IN CENTRAL EUROPE LIONEL ALEXANDER RITCHIE On the evening of 22 May 1896 the general assembly of the Free Church of Scotland enjoyed what had become a popular fixture in its deliberations. The first Friday evening of the assembly was, by custom, given over to the report of the church’s Jewish committee. On this occasion an address by Daniel Edward provided the highlight. Edward had been forced through ill health to return from his station at Breslau1 a year before. Now, as he prepared to speack, “the whole Assembly, by a spontaneous impulse, rose to their feet as the veteran tottered to the platform”2. Edward delivered a stirring address to a response of deafening applause, the performance no doubt enhanced by his appearance, which was described as “picturesque and quite apostolically”3. The gesture of appreciation was timely, for but a few days later he was prostrated by a stroke of paralysis and died on 12 June, to be interred in Edinburgh’s Grange cemetery. Thus ended a remarkable career that spanned the entire period of Jewish missionary endeavor on the part of the Free Church and, before that, the Church of Scotland. If the listeners to what proved to be his valedictory address felt that they were listening to the voice of another era, they had every cause. Daniel Edward was born in Edinburgh in 1815 and was educated at the High School and university, from which he received the degree of M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan – Mar 2016
    The Bulwark Magazine of the Scottish Reformation Society JAN - MARCH 2016 // £2 January - March 2016 1 The Bulwark PROBLEMS CONFRONTING THE CHUrch Magazine of the Scottish Reformation Society The Magdalen Chapel 41 Cowgate, Edinburgh, EH1 1JR Tel: 0131 220 1450 3 Email: [email protected] www.scottishreformationsociety.org Registered charity: SC007755 Chairman Committee Members » Rev Dr S James Millar WIDESPREAD IGNORANCE: » Rev Maurice Roberts Vice-chairman » Rev Kenneth Macdonald » Rev John J Murray THE CAUSE AND » Mr James Dickson Secretary » Mr Allan McCulloch » Rev Douglas Somerset THE CURE » Rev Alasdair Macleod Treasurer » Mr Matthew Vogan » Rev Andrew Coghill John J Murray This is the third of a series of articles by Mr Murray on the subject ‘Problems confronting the Church’. CO-OPERATION OBJECTS OF THE SOCIETY In pursuance of its objects, the Society may co- (a) To propagate the evangelical Protestant faith and those principles held in common by operate with Churches and with other Societies those Churches and organisations adhering to whose objects are in harmony with its own. the Reformation; We are living in a day of gross ignorance and reveal who He is and what He has done. Magazine Editor: Rev Douglas Somerset (b) To diffuse sound and Scriptural teaching on a lack of discernment regarding spiritual That communication came at first through All literary contributions, books for review and the distinctive tenets of Protestantism and matters. The God of the Bible has largely the prophets in the Old Testament and Roman Catholicism; papers, should be sent to: disappeared from view in our society. The then in due time through the incarnate Bible is a closed book to many.
    [Show full text]
  • 352 LIST ADAIR, J. the Puritans. Religion
    LIST 352 1. ADAIR, J. The Puritans. Religion and Politics in Seventeenth Century £ 4.95 England and America. Sutton-1998. lfpb. 302pp. 2. ADAMS Thomas The Works of Thomas Adams, 3 volume set. Edin.- J.Nichol £ 28.00 -1861 boards stained, volume 1 spine chipped, text good. 3. ADAMS, J. E. The Christian Counsellor's New Testament. N. T. in Everyday £ 12.00 English. P&R.-1977. 770pp. Limp kiver. 4. ADAMS, J. E. Preaching With Purpose. Zon.-1982. lfpb. 162pp. £ 3.50 5. AIKMAN, James Annals of the Persecution in Scotland from the Restoration to £ 38.00 the Revolution. Edin.-1842. hb. 12+556pp. Recent cloth rebind. 6. ALEXANDER, A. The Log College. BOT.-1968. hb. 251pp. £ 6.95 7. ALEXANDER, A. The Canon of the Old and New Testaments Ascertained. Edin. £ 18.00 -1855. hb. 295pp uncut. Scarce. 8. ALEXANDER, A. The Log College. BOT.-1968. d,w, 251pp. £ 6.50 9. ALEXANDER, A. A. The Log College Biographical Skeches of William Tennent & £ 6.50 His Students with an acount of revivals under their ministries. BOT-1968 hb. 251pp. 10. ALEXANDER, The Cannon of the Old and New Testaments Ascertained or, £ 35.00 Archibald The Bible Complete Without Apocrypha. Philadelphia-1851. hb. 359pp. Scarce work. 11. ALEXANDER, J. A. The Gospel of Mark Explained. Lon.-1884. hb. 444pp. £ 15.00 12. ALEXANDER, J. W. Thoughts on Preaching. BOT.-1975. D.w. 318pp.0 £ 6.50 13. ALEXANDER, J. W. Consolation. SDG.-1992. d.w. 448pp. £ 9.00 14. ALEXANDER, J. W. God is Love. Communion Addresses. BOT.-1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical List of Graduates of the University of Edinburgh From
    18 5 9-88. $*— #2 LI BR AR Y UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. GIFT OK Received , _$?g^L.„„_ /^^ . ccessions ^ No. 4 Shelf No. _ _$_f__ % 3 <A? 30 Stni&jersitjj of (Strittbttrglj LIST OF GRADUATES 1859-88 f/ <yK' OF TH uitive: '4zirm$ ; ALPHABETICAL LIST OF (Srab»at£0 of the Eroteraitg of (Sbiuburgh From 1859 TO 1888 [both years included) WITH HISTORICAL APPENDIX (Including Present and Past Office-bearers) AND SEPARATE LISTS HONORARY GRADUATES AND GRADUATES WITH HONOURS INFORMATION AS TO UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, MUSEUMS, LABORATORIES, BENEFACTIONS TO THE UNIVERSITY, ETC. EDINBURGH JJubltshcb bij (Drbet of the $enatns JUftbemtme BY JAMES THIN, TUBLISIIER TO THE UNIVERSITY <? '/ > 7 7 f-3 1 CONTENTS. Introductory ..... 5 Table of Abbreviations .... 16 Alphabetical List of Graduates from 1859 to i< BOTH Years included .... 17 HISTORICAL APPENDIX. Constitution of the University 9.3 Names of Present Office-Bearers 93 Laboratories and Museums .... 99 Statement regarding Library and its Benefactors 101 Do. do. Benefactors of University 102 Do. do. Portraits and Busts >°3 Chronological Lists of the— Chancellors .... 103 Vice-Chancellors .... '03 Rectors ...... «°3 Representatives in Parliament 104 University Court .... 104 Curators of Patronage 105 Representatives in General Medical Council 106 Principals and Professors . 106 University Examiners 1 Librarians ..... 13 Graduation Ceremonials. Academic Costume 3 Honorary Graduates in Divinity 13 Do. Do. Law '7 Sponsio Academica, Signed by students on Matriculating 124 Sponsio Academica, Signed by Graduates in Arts [24 List of Graduates in Arts with Honours i»5 Do. Do. Law with Honours 27 Sponsio Academica, Signed by Graduates in Medicine ^7 Lists of Graduates in Medicine, Gold Medallists 28 Do.
    [Show full text]
  • Revival and the Clash of Cultures: Ferryden, Forfarshire, in 1859
    Contrasting Worldviews in Revival: Ferryden, Scotland, in 1859 D. W. Bebbington Professor of History, University of Stirling Revivalism, according to a jaundiced correspondent of the Montrose Review in 1859, was ‘a vortex of mad excitement’, usually ‘the result of mental derangement’.1 Revivals are often thought to be irrational affairs, hysterical outbursts of unleashed emotion that are devoid of intellectual content. Consequently they are often dismissed by historians as hardly worth examination. Two recent works, however, go a long way towards showing how misconceived are the historical neglect and the disdainful estimate on which it is based. In an examination of the awakenings of the period 1858-62 in the north-east of Scotland, Ken Jeffrey has shown that revivalism was an internally variegated phenomenon reflecting the work patterns and social structures of different adjacent areas.2 In a second book Janice Holmes has laid bare how contested were the practices of the Ulster Revival of 1859, with some commentators in Britain as well as Ireland condemning what others approved.3 Revivals, it is clear from these accounts, were complicated happenings which sympathetic Evangelicals assessed in different ways. The present study, which is based on a single revival in the village of Ferryden contemporary with those researched by Jeffrey and Holmes, takes their analysis a step further by exploring the ideas of the people involved in the awakening. It examines the contrasting attitudes of various groups of preachers and converts participating in the events at Ferryden, bringing out their differences of opinion and identifying the roots of their disagreements. It tries to suggest that around a minor episode rival worldviews 2 came into collision.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © 2018 Jordan Mark Stone All Rights Reserved. the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Has Permission to Reproduce A
    Copyright © 2018 Jordan Mark Stone All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. A COMMUNION OF LOVE: THE ANIMATING PRINCIPLE BEHIND THE CHRISTOCENTRIC SPIRITUALITY OF ROBERT MURRAY M’CHEYNE __________________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________________ by Jordan Mark Stone May 2018 APPROVAL SHEET A COMMUNION OF LOVE: THE ANIMATING PRINCIPLE BEHIND THE CHRISTOCENTRIC SPIRITUALITY OF ROBERT MURRAY M’CHEYNE Jordan Mark Stone Read and Approved by: __________________________________________ J. Stephen Yuille (Chair) __________________________________________ Michael A. G. Haykin __________________________________________ Thomas J. Nettles Date______________________________ For Matt Boswell, David Rea, Dr. R. Carlton Wynne, and Afshin Ziafat— champions of Christ. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... vii PREFACE ........................................................................................................................ viii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 Thesis ..................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Macleod2019.Pdf
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. John Kennedy and the Development of Evangelicalism in the Scottish Highlands, 1843–1900 Alasdair J. Macleod Doctor of Philosophy, University of Edinburgh, 2018 Declaration I declare that this thesis has been composed by me, and that the work herein contained is my own. I hereby indicate that this thesis does not include work submitted for any other academic degree or professional qualification. Signed Alasdair J. Macleod 23 August 2018 2 ABSTRACT Between the Disruption in 1843 and 1900, the evangelical Presbyterianism of the Highlands of Scotland diverged dramatically and enduringly, in theology, worship, piety and practice, from that of Lowland Scotland. That divergence was chiefly the product of change in the Lowland Church, as evangelicals increasingly rejected Calvinistic theology, Confessional subscription, church establishment, conservative practices in worship, high views of the inspiration of Scripture, and emphasis on Divine sovereignty in evangelism.
    [Show full text]