Alfa Romeo 159 Audi A3 Audi A3 Baic Senova A12 2010 2015 Audi A4
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
BAIC Motor 2016 Annual Results Announcement 北京汽车股份有限公司2016年度业绩推介材料
BAIC Motor 2016 Annual Results Announcement 北京汽车股份有限公司2016年度业绩推介材料 2017.03 Hong Kong Stock Code: 1958.HK Statement This demonstration film and the information it contained do not constitute suggestions on the trading of any securities of BAIC Motor Corporation Ltd. (“the Company”) or offers on the trading of any Company securities, and do not constitute foundation or basis of any contract or commitment. As for the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information or suggestions contained in this demonstration film, we do not make any explicit or inexplicit statement or guarantee, and shall not rely on the above-mentioned information or suggestions. As for the losses arising from using this demonstration film or its contents, or other reasons related to this demonstration film, regardless of the nature, the Company and any of its consultant or representative do not undertake any responsibilities or obligations (be it due to negligence or other reasons). Information contained in this demonstration film may be updated, reorganized, modified, verified and revised and the above-mentioned information may be subject to significant changes. This presentation contains predictive statements regarding the Company's financial condition, operating performances and business, and certain plans and objectives of the Company's management, which can involve predictable and unpredictable risks, uncertainties and other factors, and these risks, uncertainties and other factors can possibly lead to significant differences between the actual future performances of the Company and those explicitly or inexplicitly expressed in the above-mentioned predictive statements. The above predictive statements are based on the Company's current and future business strategies and various assumptions based on the political and economic environment in which the Company will conduct business in the future. -
2017 Passenger Vehicles Actual and Reported Fuel Consumption: a Gap Analysis
2017 Passenger Vehicles Actual and Reported Fuel Consumption: A Gap Analysis Innovation Center for Energy and Transportation December 2017 1 Acknowledgements We wish to thank the Energy Foundation for providing us with the financial support required for the execution of this report and subsequent research work. We would also like to express our sincere thanks for the valuable advice and recommendations provided by distinguished industry experts and colleagues—Jin Yuefu, Li Mengliang, Guo Qianli,. Meng Qingkuo, Ma Dong, Yang Zifei, Xin Yan and Gong Huiming. Authors Lanzhi Qin, Maya Ben Dror, Hongbo Sun, Liping Kang, Feng An Disclosure The report does not represent the views of its funders nor supporters. The Innovation Center for Energy and Transportation (iCET) Beijing Fortune Plaza Tower A Suite 27H No.7 DongSanHuan Middle Rd., Chaoyang District, Beijing 10020 Phone: 0086.10.6585.7324 Email: [email protected] Website: www.icet.org.cn 2 Glossary of Terms LDV Light Duty Vehicles; Vehicles of M1, M2 and N1 category not exceeding 3,500kg curb-weight. Category M1 Vehicles designed and constructed for the carriage of passengers comprising no more than eight seats in addition to the driver's seat. Category M2 Vehicles designed and constructed for the carriage of passengers, comprising more than eight seats in addition to the driver's seat, and having a maximum mass not exceeding 5 tons. Category N1 Vehicles designed and constructed for the carriage of goods and having a maximum mass not exceeding 3.5 tons. Real-world FC FC values calculated based on BearOil app user data input. -
Poland Regional Cities-Comfort-Vehicle-List
Make Model Year Oldsmobile 19 Oldsmobile Alero Oldsmobile Aurora Oldsmobile Bravada Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Oldsmobile Intrigue Oldsmobile Silhouette Dodge Attitude Dodge Avenger 2013 Dodge Caliber Dodge Caravan 2015 Dodge Challenger Dodge Charger 2013 Dodge Dakota Dodge Dart 2015 Dodge Durango 2013 Dodge Grand Caravan 2015 Dodge Intrepid Dodge JCUV Dodge Journey 2013 Dodge Magnum 2013 Dodge Neon 2015 Dodge Nitro 2013 Dodge Ram 1500 Dodge Ram 2500 Dodge Ram 3500 Dodge Ram 4500 Dodge Ram 700 Dodge Ram Van 2015 Dodge Sprinter Dodge Stratus 2015 Dodge Stretch Limo Dodge Viper Dodge Vision Dodge i10 Land Rover Defender 2013 Land Rover Discovery 2013 Land Rover Freelander 2013 Land Rover Freelander 2 Land Rover LR2 Land Rover LR3 Land Rover LR4 Land Rover Range Rover 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Vogue 2013 Chevrolet Agile Chevrolet Astra 2015 Chevrolet Astro Chevrolet Avalanche 2013 Chevrolet Aveo Chevrolet Aveo5 Chevrolet Beat Chevrolet Blazer Chevrolet Bolt Chevrolet CMV Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Caprice Chevrolet Captiva 2013 Chevrolet Cavalier Chevrolet Celta Chevrolet Chevy Chevrolet City Express Chevrolet Classic Chevrolet Cobalt 2015 Chevrolet Colorado Chevrolet Corsa Chevrolet Corsa Sedan Chevrolet Corsa Wagon Chevrolet Corvette Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 Chevrolet Cruze 2015 Chevrolet Cruze Sport6 Chevrolet Dmax Chevrolet Enjoy Chevrolet Epica 2013 Chevrolet Equinox 2013 Chevrolet Esteem Chevrolet Evanda 2013 Chevrolet Exclusive Chevrolet -
Baic(1958.Hk)
EQUITY RESEARCH BAIC (1958.HK) Benefit from Benz`s new product cycle 17 Jul 2015 Hong Kong | Automobile | Initiation Report ·BAIC develops her own brands of economical vehicles (namely “Senova” series, “Beijing” BUY (Initiation) series and “Wevon” series) and also possesses the luxury vehicle brand of “Beijing Benz” as CMP HKD 7.82 well as the medium-high end brand of “Beijing Hyundai”. In 2009, Beijing Automotive (Closing price as at 15 July 2015) Industry Group acquired Saab Technology and applied them on her own brand of “Senova” TARGET HKD 13.23 (+69%) series passenger cars. COMPANY DATA ·Last year, the Company`s annual income demonstrated a growth of 3.4 times, to O/S SHARES (MN) : 6419 RMB56.37 billion. Such surge of income is mainly due to the acquisition of Beijing Benz and MARKET CAP (HKD MN) : 16427 the rapid growth of sales of newly launched vehicles. Gross profit margin also increased 52 - WK HI/LO (HKD): 11.5 / 7.14 from 3.2% in 2013 to 15.9% in 2014. Net profit attributable to parent company recorded RMB4.511 billion, up 66% yoy, with corresponding earning per share as RMB0.7 (RMB0.48 recorded in 2013). Boosted by the hot sales of Beijing Benz, its Q115 net profit surged to RMB1.63billion, up 104% yoy, and its gross margin climb to 22.3%. SHARE HOLDING PATTERN, % Beijing Automotive Group Co., Ltd 45.6 · Beijing Shougang Co., Ltd 13.7 Beijing Hyundai is the largest contributor of profit. Beijing Hyundai`s two new factories in Daimler AG 10.08 Cangzhou and Chongqing would commence operation next year, with preliminary planned PRICE PERFORMANCE, % annual production capacity as 300,000 vehicles each, and expected accomplishment by 2016 1M 3M 1Y year-end and 2017 year-end respectively. -
China Autos Driving the EV Revolution
Building on principles One-Asia Research | August 21, 2020 China Autos Driving the EV revolution Hyunwoo Jin [email protected] This publication was prepared by Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. and/or its non-U.S. affiliates (“Mirae Asset Daewoo”). Information and opinions contained herein have been compiled in good faith from sources deemed to be reliable. However, the information has not been independently verified. Mirae Asset Daewoo makes no guarantee, representation, or warranty, express or implied, as to the fairness, accuracy, or completeness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Mirae Asset Daewoo accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any loss arising from the use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith. Information and opin- ions contained herein are subject to change without notice. This document is for informational purposes only. It is not and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This document may not be reproduced, further distributed, or published in whole or in part for any purpose. Please see important disclosures & disclaimers in Appendix 1 at the end of this report. August 21, 2020 China Autos CONTENTS Executive summary 3 I. Investment points 5 1. Geely: Strong in-house brands and rising competitiveness in EVs 5 2. BYD and NIO: EV focus 14 3. GAC: Strategic market positioning (mass EVs + premium imported cars) 26 Other industry issues 30 Global company analysis 31 Geely Automobile (175 HK/Buy) 32 BYD (1211 HK/Buy) 51 NIO (NIO US/Buy) 64 Guangzhou Automobile Group (2238 HK/Trading Buy) 76 Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 2 August 21, 2020 China Autos Executive summary The next decade will bring radical changes to the global automotive market. -
Big Wheels Keep on Turning: Raising Target Price, Reiterate CL-Buy
November 11, 2016 ACTION Buy Geely Automobile Holdings (0175.HK) Return Potential: 25% Equity Research Big wheels keep on turning: Raising target price, reiterate CL-Buy Source of opportunity Investment Profile Our core thesis on Geely remains the same – an improving product pipeline Low High and reducing capacity bottlenecks driving higher volumes/margins. We still Growth Growth see empty spaces for Geely to grow its brand, particularly in small/mid-size Returns * Returns * SUVs and MPVs. We take a closer look at its new Lynk & Co. brand, where a Multiple Multiple ‘blue sky’ scenario could see volume potential of >1mn units p.a. by 2020E, Volatility Volatility Percentile 20th 40th 60th 80th 100th leading to 44% higher total sales for Geely listco vs. our base case. We also Geely Automobile Holdings (0175.HK) examine Geely’s potential to optimize its platforms, powertrains and capacity. Asia Pacific Autos & Autoparts Peer Group Average Our 2017E EPS is 21% ahead of consensus and we reiterate our Buy (on * Returns = Return on Capital For a complete description of the investment profile measures please refer to the Conviction List) with a revised HK$10.15 12m TP implying 25% upside. disclosure section of this document. Catalyst Key data Current Price (HK$) 8.15 (1) Continuous new product launches: Sub-compact SUV, MPV, and Lynk & Co. 12 month price target (HK$) 10.15 Market cap (HK$ mn / US$ mn) 71,736.2 / 9,248.2 models in 2017E; (2) High monthly volume likely in November/December Foreign ownership (%) -- upon removal of capacity bottleneck (we expect Boyue/GL monthly volume to reach 20k/10k units in 1Q17E); (3) Better visibility on the new Lynk & Co. -
Internationalization and Distribution Strategies of the Chinese Automotive Sector: the Case of Colombia and Peru
Internationalization and distribution strategies of the Chinese automotive sector: The case of Colombia and Peru ABSTRACT When the Chinese auto industry decided to stop supplying the local market and expand to the western market, it had to evaluate the best alternative to market its brands. This article develops, on the one hand, from a conceptual approach, the modes of entry and the forms of distribution follow the automotive brands; and on the other hand, from an applied approach, the internationalization and distribution strategies of the Chinese brands (Changan, Great Wall, Haval, JAC and BAIC) of light vehicles present in Colombia and Peru. In this second part you can know the history of each of these brands since they arrived in each of the countries chosen as a case study, its evolution and its current behavior. KEYWORDS Internationalization - Distribution - Automotive industry - Chinese brands - Colombia - Peru 1. INTRODUCTION The automotive sector, in the countries where it is a big business, is one aspect of development for the benefits that it represents for its economy, among them, consumption, employment generation and foreign exchange income, but also in improving the quality of transport of its inhabitants. Although the industry is well developed in the United States, Europe and the Asian continent, it is expected that it will also develop in Latin America, a region that already represents the fourth largest market in the world. Speaking of Latin America, it shows that in this region three groups of countries are distinguished. The first one, consisting only of Brazil, which, due to the size of its population, consumes almost all of the vehicles it assembles. -
New-Vehicle Owners in China Tend to Spend at Non-Dealers Despite Warranty, J.D
New-Vehicle Owners in China Tend to Spend at Non-Dealers despite Warranty, J.D. Power Finds Audi, Beijing Hyundai Rank Highest in Customer Satisfaction in Respective Segments BEIJING: 27 July 2017 — Vehicle owners in China often turn to non-dealers in the early stages of ownership even when most vehicles are still under warranty, according to the J.D. Power 2017 China Customer Service Index (CSI) Study,SM released today. Owners of 1- to 4-year-old vehicles have made an average of 3.2 visits to dealers and 0.9 to non-dealers for service in the past year. Among new-vehicle owners who indicate having spent on non-dealer service, 71% have visited non-dealers for service over the past 12 months in spite of warranty. Their expenditures on service at dealers and non-dealers in the past year is very close—an average of RMB2,450; USD362 and RMB2,098; USD310, respectively. Car service chain stores and street quick-service centers, which combined account for 66% of all non-dealer service, have become the primary competitors to dealerships. In addition to convenience of location (43%), other top reasons for visiting non-dealers for service include open on convenient days/hours (23%); recommendation from a friend or relative (23%); and speedy service (21%). New-vehicle owners visit non-dealers mainly for such services as lube/ oil/ filter change (40%); other routine maintenance (33%); emergency repairs (24%); and non-emergency repairs (22%). “These reasons are closely associated with service quality and customers’ satisfaction,” said Ann Xie, senior research director at J.D. -
China Annex VI
Annex I. Relations Between Foreign and Chinese Automobile Manufacturers Annex II. Brands Produced by the Main Chinese Manufacturers Annex III. SWOT Analysis of Each of the Ten Main Players Annex IV. Overview of the Location of the Production Centers/Offices of the Main Chinese Players Annex V. Overview of the Main Auto Export/Import Ports in China Annex VI. An Atlas of Pollution: The World in Carbon Dioxide Emissions Annex VII. Green Energy Vehicles Annex VIII. Further Analysis in the EV vehicles Annex IX. Shifts Towards E-mobility Annex I. Relations Between Foreign and Chinese Automobile Manufacturers. 100% FIAT 50% Mitsubishi Guangzhou IVECO 50% Beijing Motors 50% Hyundai 50% GAC Guangzhou FIAT GAC VOLVO 91.94% Mitsubishi 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% (AB Group) Guangzhou BBAC 50% Hino Hino Dongfeng DCD Yuan Beiqi 50% 50% NAVECO Invest Dongfeng NAC Yuejin 50% Cumins Wuyang 50% Guangzhou GAC Motor Honda 50% Yuejin Beiqi Foton Toyota 50% Cumins DET 50% 55.6% 10% 20% 50% Beiqi DYK 100% Guangzhou Group Motors 50% 70% Daimler Toyota 30% 25% 50% 65% Yanfeng SDS shanghai 4.25% 100% 49% Engine Honda sunwin bus 65% 25% visteon Holdings Auto 50% (China) UAES NAC Guangzhou 50% Beilu Beijing 34% Denway Automotive 50% Foton 51% 39% motorl Guangzhou 50% Shanghai Beiqi Foton Daimler 100% 30% 50% VW BAIC Honda Kolben 50% 90% Zhonglong 50% Transmission 50% DCVC schmitt Daimler Invest 100% 10% Guangzhou piston 49% DFM 53% Invest Guangzhou Isuzu Bus 100% Denway Beiqi 33.3% Bus GTE GTMC Manafacture xingfu motor 50% 20% SAIC SALES 100% 20% 100% 100% DFMC 100% Shanghai -
Leapfrogging Or Stalling Out? Electric Vehicles in China
Leapfrogging or Stalling Out? Electric Vehicles in China Sabrina Howell Henry Lee Adam Heal 2015 RPP-2015-07 Regulatory Policy Program Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government Harvard Kennedy School 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Weil Hall Cambridge, MA 02138 CITATION This paper may be cited as: Howell, Sabrina, Henry Lee, and Adam Heal. 2015. “Leapfrogging or Stalling Out? Electric Vehicles in China.” Regulatory Policy Program Working Paper RPP-2015-07. Cambridge, MA: Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University. Comments may be directed to the authors. REGULATORY POLICY PROGRAM The Regulatory Policy Program at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government serves as a catalyst and clearinghouse for the study of regulation across Harvard University. The program's objectives are to cross-pollinate research, spark new lines of inquiry, and increase the connection between theory and practice. Through seminars and symposia, working papers, and new media, RPP explores themes that cut across regulation in its various domains: market failures and the public policy case for government regulation; the efficacy and efficiency of various regulatory instruments; and the most effective ways to foster transparent and participatory regulatory processes. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by the Regulatory Policy Program, the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, Harvard Kennedy School, or Harvard University. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Further information on the Regulatory Policy Program can be obtained from the Program's executive director, Jennifer Nash, Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, Weil Hall, Harvard Kennedy School, 79 JKF Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, telephone (617) 495-9379, telefax (617) 496-0063, email [email protected]. -
SENOVA X65-BASIC- SPECIFICATION 2.0T 5MT 2.0T 6AT P&C Comfort Elite-SOP Luxury-SOP Comfort Elite-SOP Luxury-SOP 0 Basic Parameters
SENOVA X65-BASIC- SPECIFICATION 2.0T 5MT 2.0T 6AT P&C Comfort Elite-SOP Luxury-SOP Comfort Elite-SOP Luxury-SOP 0 Basic Parameters 0.1 Length×width×height (mm) 4654×1816×1680 0.2 Wheel base (mm) 2670 0.3 Wheel tread (mm) 1540/1540 0.4 Min. ground clearance (mm) 180 0.5 Min. turning diameter (mm) 11 0.6 Curb weight (kg) 1545 1575 0.7 fuel tank capacity (L) 60 0.8 No. of doors/ seats 5/5 Approach angle/Departure 0.9 21/24 angle (°） 0.10 Tyre 225/60 R17 1.00 Powertrain 1.1 Max. power (kw/rpm) 130 130 130 130 130 130 1.2 Max. torque (N.m/rpm) 240 240 240 240 240 240 1.3 fuel type 92#/93# 92#/93# 92#/93# 92#/93# 92#/93# 92#/93# 1.4 emission Euro V Euro V Euro V Euro V Euro V Euro V 1.5 Drive type FF FF FF FF FF FF 1.6 Front brake Ventilated disc Ventilated disc Ventilated disc Ventilated disc Ventilated disc Ventilated disc 1.7 Rear brake Disc Disc Disc Disc Disc Disc 1.8 17 inch aluminium alloy rim ● — — ● — — 17 inch aluminium alloy rim- 1.9 — ● ● — ● ● dual colors 1.11 Spare tyre Non-full size Non-full size Non-full size Non-full size Non-full size Non-full size 1.12 Spare tyre position In the trunk In the trunk In the trunk In the trunk In the trunk In the trunk 2.00 Control & Safety 2.1 ABS+EBD ● ● ● ● ● ● 2.2 HPS ● ● ● ● ● ● 2.3 ESP — ● ● ● ● ● 2.4 Tire Pressure Monitoring System — ● ● — ● ● 2.5 Cruise control system — — — ● ● ● Dual airbags (hidden blasting 2.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● line in passenger seat) 2.7 Front side airbag — ● ● — ● ● 2.8 side curtain airbag (front & rear) — — ● — ● ● 2.9 Front three-point seat belts ● — — ● — — Front pretightening -
W JD Power Reports: Problems Experienced by Luxury Car Owners
w J.D. Power Reports: Problems Experienced by Luxury Car Owners with ACEN Technology Create Opportunities and Challenges for China Market Porsche Ranks Highest in Initial Quality among Luxury Brands; Beijing Hyundai Ranks Highest among Mass Market Brands and Receives Four Model-Level Awards Shanghai: 30 October 2015 — The only problem category in which luxury car owners experience more problems with their vehicle than mass market vehicle owners is with their audio, communication, entertainment and navigation (ACEN) system, according to the J.D. Power 2015 China Initial Quality StudySM (IQS) released today. Now in its 16th year, the study serves as the industry benchmark for new-vehicle quality by examining problems experienced by new-vehicle owners within the first two to six months of ownership in two distinct categories: design-related problems and defects and malfunctions. For 2015, the China IQS has been redesigned to include more specific diagnostic questions around eight problem categories: interior; exterior; engine/ transmission; driving experience; features/ controls/ displays; seats; audio/ communication/ entertainment/ navigation; and heating/ ventilation/ air conditioning. The overall initial quality score is determined by problems reported per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower number of problems indicating higher quality. With the emergence and evolution of technology in new vehicles, owners of both luxury and mass market vehicles expect and demand increasing levels of functionality. Notably, ACEN is the only category in which owners of luxury vehicles experience more problems than owners of mass market vehicles. Additionally, the largest gap in the number of problems experienced by luxury car owners vs. mass market owners is 3 percentage points in the ACEN problem category (10% vs.