Psalm 110, Melchizedek and David: Blessing (The Descendants Of) Abraham
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Psalm 110, Melchizedek and David 1 1 Psalm 110, Melchizedek and David: Blessing (the descendants of) Abraham Robin Routledge Psalm 110 is generally designated a 'royal psalm', addressed to the Davidic king by a cultic prophet. The setting may have been the king's coronation;1 though some scholars consider the psalm to be part of the annual New Year festival,2 in which the earthly king receives from the divine king the renewed promise of universal dominion. The psalm focuses on the relationship between the king who reigns in Jerusalem and Yahweh through whom the king's victories are achieved. The king has a place of honour at Yahweh's right hand (v. 1): emphasising his role as Yahweh's representative, and also his dependence on Yahweh for his power and authority. It is Yahweh who extends the king's sceptre from Zion (v. 2); and in verses 5-6 victory over the king's enemies is described in terms of Yahweh's final judgment on the rulers and nations of the world. Verse 4, which is generally understood as also being addressed to the Davidic king, describes him as a priest - though this is the only passage in the Old Testament explicitly to do so. There is some debate over the structure of the psalm. Allen is among those who divide it into two parts, marked by the introductions in verse 1 {the LORD says) and verse 4 {the LORD has sworn) which are then amplified.3 There are some parallels between the two sections - for example 'right hand' φζΓ) in verses 1, 5, and 'on the day' (DV3) in verses 2, 5. However, while there seems to be a clear link between verses 1-3 and verses 5-6, it is not at all clear where the reference to priesthood in verse 4 fits in. Verses 5-6 appear to continue the theme of verses 1-3, without any 1 See, e.g., Leslie C. Allen, Psalms 101-150, WBC 21 (Waco: Word Books, 1983), p. 83; A.A. Anderson, Psalms, 2 vols., NCB (London: Marshall, Morgan and Scott, 1972), 2:767; Sigmund Mowinckel, The Psalms in Israel's Worship (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004), 1:63; Artur Weiser, The Psalms, OTL (London: SCM, 1962), p. 693; Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15, WBC 1 (Milton Keynes: Word, 1991), p. 322; see also P.J. Nel, 'Psalm 110 and the Melchizedek Tradition', JNSL 22.1 (1996), pp. 1-14 [11]. 5 For example Aubrey R. Johnson, Sacral Kingship in Ancient Israel (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1967) specifically associates the psalm with the closing stages of the New Year Festival (pp. 130-132); see also J.H. Eaton, Kingship and the Psalms (London: SCM, 1976). 3 See also, e.g., Derek Kidner, Psalms 73-150, TOTC (London: IVP, 1975), p. 393-396; Weiser, Psalms, p. 693 - who both focus the psalm around the two divine oracles; Craig C. Broyles, Psalms, NIBC (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1999), pp. 414-416 notes the possibility that vv. 1-3 are addressed by apriest to the king, while w. 4-7 are addressed by the king to the priest. 2 Baptistic Theologies elaboration of, or even reference to, the statement in verse 4. Allen acknowledges explicitly what is implicit among most commentators, that 'the poet does not proceed to give a direct explanation of the oracle' (in v. 4).4 That, however, seems strange since both oracles are thought to give the psalm its structure, and of the two, the second, with its reference to Yahweh's irrevocable oath, seems to be the more forceful. Philip Nel prefers a tri-partite structure, and identifies verses 1-3 and verses 5-6 as oracles of blessing relating to submission of enemies; while verse 4, which stands at the centre of what he sees as a circular structure, is an oracle of election of the king as a priest. However, Nel acknowledges that the designation of the king as 'priest' (|ΓΟ) in verse 4 is 'unfamiliar';5 and that unfamiliarity prompts an elaborate attempt to explain the relationship between this verse and the rest of the psalm. The fact that this and other explanations have been deemed necessary, particularly in the case of a verse considered central to the psalm as a whole, is further indication that the relationship is far from clear. The purpose of this paper is to consider suggestions of the relationship between the general context of Psalm 110 and the reference to the priestly order of Melchizedek in verse 4, and to attempt an explanation that does justice both to this psalm and to the only other reference to Melchizedek in the Old Testament, Genesis 14:18-20. We might also point to a number of later writings and interpretations that add interest to this discussion. Psalm 110 is often quoted in the New Testament: there are several references to verse 1 ; though only the writer to the Hebrews picks up on the reference to Melchizedek in verse 4. And, of course, this writer also builds on Genesis 14 to draw parallels between the priesthood of Melchizedek and the priestly ministry of Jesus. The account of the meeting between Abraham and Melchizedek in Genesis 14 is found in the Genesis Apocryphon (from Qumran);6 it is also referred to by Philo and Josephus and in some rabbinic texts.7 These expand and interpret the Genesis account, as well as making explicit some assumptions - such as the identification of Salem (Gen. 14:18) with Jerusalem, and that the tithe (Gen. 14:20) was given by Abraham to Melchizedek - something that the Hebrew text does not make clear.8 Some Rabbis also identify Melchizedek 4 Allen, Psalms 101-150, p. 87. 5 Nel,'Psalm 110', p. 6. 6 The Genesis Apocryphon is an Aramaic translation of Gen. 14:18-20, written, maybe, at the end of the first century BC. 7 For further discussion of later writings that refer to Melchizedek, and a helpful summary of their content, see Fred L. Horton, The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources to the Fifth Century A.D. and in the Epistle to the Hebrews (Cambridge: CUP, 1976), pp. 60-82. 8 The text says only 'and he gave him a tenth of everything' (Gen. 14:20b). The more natural Psalm 110, Melchizedek and David 3 with Shem, the son of Noah, who, according to the chronology of Genesis, was not only alive at the time of Abraham, but outlived him by a further thirty five years.9 This idea continued among Christian commentators - including Luther; though Calvin was less impressed. Some Rabbinic traditions claim that because Melchizedek blessed Abraham before he blessed God, the priesthood was taken from him and conferred on Abraham and his descendants. This is in direct contrast to the interpretation of the passage by the writer of Hebrews, and there may be a hint of anti-Christian polemic; though this may also be a more general attempt to avoid undermining the Levitical priesthood. This material is broadly based on the Old Testament texts. Another text found at Qumran, 11Q Melchizedek, portrays Melchizedek as an eternal, heavenly figure who is identified with God.10 This very different portrayal has led Horton to note the possibility that this may be based on a stream of tradition separate from what we find in the Old Testament.11 That remains speculation; but even if it is the case, that tradition is almost certainly much later than Psalm 110 and Genesis 14 and so does not in any way influence the view of Melchizedek found there. For that reason I will focus the subsequent discussion primarily on those two passages. It has been argued, though no longer very forcefully, that Psalm 110 is not directly linked to the Davidic dynasty, but belongs, instead, to the Hasmonean period;12 maybe to legitimate that family's combination of priestly and royal roles. I Maccabees 14:41 uses language similar to Psalm 110:4 when it describes Simon Maccabeus as deader and high priest forever'. However, in that passage, there is no mention of Melchizedek - understanding is that it is Abraham who gives a tenth of his spoil to Melchizedek; though Fitzmyer suggests that Melchizedek, as a vassal king, gave a tenth of his share to Abraham ('Now this Melchizedek', p. 239); see also J.A. Fitzmyer, 'Melchizedek in the MT, LXX and BT', Biblica 81 (2000), pp. 63-69 [66-67]. According to Gen. 11:10-26, Shem was 390 when Abraham was born, and he died when he was 600. Abraham lived 175 years (Gen. 25:7) - making Shem 565 when he died. See further Horton, Melchizedek Tradition, pp. 54-130; for discussion of Melchizedek in church tradition, see also Bruce McNair, 'Luther, Calvin and the Exegetical Traditions of Melchisedec', Review and Expositor 101 (2004), pp. 747-761. 10 See e.g., Horton, Melchizedek Tradition, p. 79; M. de Jonge and A.S. Van de Woude, Ί1Q Melchizedek and the New Testament', NTS 12 (1965), pp. 301-326; J.A. Emerton, 'Melchizedek and the Gods: Fresh Evidence for the Jewish Background of John x.34-6', JTS 7 (1966), pp. 23-29; Joseph A. Fitzmyer, 'Further Light on Melchizedek from Qumran Cave 11 ', JBL 86.1 (1967), pp. 25-41 ; Rick van de Water, 'Michael or Yhwh? Toward Identifying Melchizedek in 11Q13', Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 16.1 (2006), pp. 75-86. 11 Horton, Melchizedek Tradition, pp. 83-86. He notes that the portrayal of Melchizedek as a heavenly, eschatological figure who is linked with Elohim is not found in other texts (e.g.