DOCSLIB.ORG

Office of the Attorney General State of Mississippi 2016 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Office of the Attorney General State of Mississippi 2016 Annual Report MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL 2016 Office of the Attorney General State of Mississippi 2016 Annual Report Attorney General Jim Hood 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Page 1 MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL A Message from Attorney General Jim Hood Dear Fellow Mississippians, This past January, I had the great privilege to be sworn in to my fourth term as Attorney General. I am humbled and honored by the confidence that the state’s voters have shown in me. As Mississippi’s chief legal officer, I lead a team of dedicated professionals, all of whom are committed to protecting our great state. As I begin my 14th year in office, I am pleased to present to you the annual report from my office for Fiscal Year 2016. Since I took office, rapid changes to technology have given criminals and con artists new ways to prey upon citizens. However, I am proud that our office has met the challenge of these modern problems. We use sophisticated investigative tools to track down cyber criminals and child predators. We strive to stay a step ahead of those who would attempt to take advantage of Mississippi residents. As we respond to new threats, we continue to investigate and prosecute new cases, assist consumers and crime victims, and train law enforcement officers and prosecutors. The attorneys, investigators, program managers, and support staff who serve you in the Attorney General's Office are among the most accomplished and experienced public servants in the nation. This year, two of them were singled out for national recognition. Paula Broome, Bureau of Victim Assistance, was recognized by the American Bar Association for her service to victims of domestic violence. Consumer investigator Doug Tyrone was named Investigator of the Year by Discover Financial Services. I am glad to have Paula, Doug, and many others like them on our staff. Mississippi is better for it. My priority remains protecting our children from online threats. My office leads the Mississippi Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, a group comprised of more than 60 law enforcement agencies throughout the state. The task force continues to take dangerous child predators off the streets, and I will continue the important work of the task force to protect our children and vulnerable citizens. Our Bureau of Victim Assistance awarded more than $3.7 million to victims of violent crime this fiscal year. This money comes from assessments on criminals which goes back to help the victims. This year we trained more than 3,400 law enforcement officers, investigators, and dispatchers on Mississippi law, including de-escalation tactics, domestic violence laws, and issues related to sexual assault, stalking, and human trafficking. This year, my office recovered more than $75 million for the state, much of which came from out-of-state corporations which wronged Mississippi and its residents. As Fiscal Year 2017 started, the state received its first $150 million payment from BP. This was deposited into the State Budget Contingency Fund to assist in the economic recovery of our coastal communities and those areas impacted by the by the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster. To date, we have returned more than $3 billion to the state since I took office. Despite budget constraints, my office will continue to work to assist crime victims, fund claims for law enforcement officers and firefighters, and hold accountable anyone, whether an individual or greedy corporation, that seeks to harm Mississippi residents. I trust you to hold me and my office accountable, and this annual report demonstrates to you our record of performance. Thank you for the opportunity to serve as your Attorney General. Please let me or my office know if there is anything we can do better to help the great people of this state. Sincerely yours, Jim Hood Attorney General 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Page 3 MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Page 4 MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL Table of Contents Message from Attorney General Jim Hood 3 Table of Contents 5 Mississippi Attorney General’s Executive Summary 7 Executive Branch of the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office 13 Bureau of Victim Assistance 15 Civil Litigation Division 27 Consumer Protection Division 39 Criminal Litigation Division 47 Medicaid Fraud Control Unit 50 Opinions and Local Government 51 Prosecutor Training Division 53 Public Integrity Division 55 (Public Integrity Unit, Alcohol and Tobacco Enforcement, Child Desertion, Cyber Crime, DUI Train- ing, Insurance Fraud, and Vulnerable Adults) Administration and Support Services 81 Agriculture Division 84 Department of Corrections 85 Mississippi Development Authority 85 Department of Education 86 Department of Finance and Administration 89 Mississippi Forestry Commission 90 Mississippi Gaming Commission 90 Mississippi Department of Health 91 Human Services Division 93 Information Technology Services 95 Institutions of Higher Learning 96 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Page 5 MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL Table of Contents (Con’t) Mississippi Department of Insurance 98 Mississippi Department of Marine Resources 99 Division of Medicaid 101 Department of Mental Health 102 Pearl River Valley Water Supply District 103 State Personnel Board 104 Professional Licensure and Regulatory Section 105 Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) 105 Secretary of State Public Lands Division 106 Department of Rehabilitation Services 106 Mississippi Department of Transportation 107 State Veterans Affairs Board 110 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks 111 Support Services Division 113-115 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Page 6 MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL FUNDS RECOVERED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2016 Source Type Amount Disposition Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Restitution & Penalties 13,527,598 State of MS; DOM; AGO; Federal Gov't Consumer Protection Division Restitution, Penalties & Settlement 1,630,059 State of MS; AGO; Consumers, Recoveries Victims, Citizens Public Integrity Division Restitution, Fines & Fees 87,326 State of MS; AGO; Victims & Citizens Vulnerable Persons Unit Restitution & Fines 349,096 Victims & Citizens Child Desertion Unit Restitution & Fines 285,385 DHS; Custodial Parents Insurance Integrity Enforcement Bureau Restitution & Fines 285,311 State of MS; AGO; Victims & Citizens Cyber Crime Division Restitution & Fines 67,000 State of MS; AGO; Victims & Citizens Alcohol & Tobacco Enforcement Division Fines 94,514 Justice & Municipal Courts Civil Litigation Audit Recoveries 1,934,798 State of MS: Taxpayers Division of Medicaid Subrogation, Estate Recoveries & 2,474,088 State of MS; DOM; Clients Special Needs Trusts MS Department of Transportation Workers' Comp Subrogated Claims, Motor 186,660 State of MS; MDOT; Citizens Vehicle & Other Property Damage Department of Agriculture Fines & Penalties 49,975 State of MS; Dept of Ag. Department of Rehabilitation Services Subrogation claims 117,802 Agency Clients Pearl River Valley Water Supply District Delinquent Lease Fees 119,335 State of MS; PRVWSD Watson / Forest Laboratories Settlement 4,308,000 State of MS; AGO Transocean - BP Oil Settlement 4,000,000 State of MS Jannsen (Risperdal) Settlement 7,328,448 State of MS; AGO JP Morgan Chase Bank Settlement 4,088,020 State of MS; AGO Experian Information Solutions Inc Settlement 2,250,438 State of MS; AGO Transocean North America - BP Oil Settlement 5,000,000 State of MS; MDEQ; MS AGO Sandoz, Inc Settlement 26,033,316 State of MS Equifax, Inc Settlement 1,159,023 State of MS; AGO Total Funds Recovered - FY 2016 75,376,192 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Page 7 MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BUREAU OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE Assisted 951 victims of violent and non-violent crimes Trained more than 3,400 law enforcement officers and dispatchers on Mississippi law Trained more than 605 court personnel (judges, clerks, and prosecutors) on state law related to domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, strangulation, and human trafficking Trained 691 professionals, including social workers, advocates, private attorneys, community members and faith-based groups Provided technical assistance to more than1,500 on the Domestic Abuse Protection Order Registry and Uniform Domestic Violence Offense Reporting System Trained 77 nurses in Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner certification Officer-Involved Shooting Training • 400 Trained—Officer involved shooting course in cooperation with USDOJ, RCTA, & LEAPS Crime Victim Compensation Crime Victim Compensation awarded $3,747,754.61 and received 1,171 claim applications Crime Victim Compensation received a federal grant for $972,000 Bureau of Victim Assistance paid $138,062.59 to cover costs of 197 sexual assault medical forensic examinations CIVIL LITIGATION $1,934,798.46 recovered in audit/ethics matters, including recoveries for cities and counties Positive outcome in 95 percent of Civil Litigation cases in federal and state courts Positive outcome in 100 percent of prisoner complaints filed in federal courts CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION Responded to 54,613 phone calls for assistance $1,426,139.07 collected in restitution $ 203,919.80 recovered in costs and fees Average restitution per investigator $285,227.81 1,504 cases opened 185 identity theft cases opened 14 home repair fraud cases opened 2 home repair fraud arrests 6 intellectual property crimes arrests 15 identity theft arrests 10 additional arrests (i.e. mail fraud, wire fraud, false pretense) CRIMINAL LITIGATION DIVISION Appellate Section Filed 328 briefs and 51 miscellaneous responses in the Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Had 20 Oral
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Executive Summary 111111.25 '"111.4 II
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. "r,'"_" , -" .~,- ~ 7 '~~ :;-~ ~-.. ,j National Criminal Justice Reference Service i ---------------~~--------------------------------------------~ r , ,i Prepared for the­ ""I I , Mississippi Judicial Council "f nCJrs This microfiche was produced frQm documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, fjl, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on Th~ Mississippi Court Finance Study this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. I , I Executive Summary 111111.25 '"111.4 II MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU Of STANDARDS-196;>-A Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with i I the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. i Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not represent the official I position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. I \----J Date Filmed Ernest H. Short March, 1980 National Institute of ,Justice I &Associates, Inc. United States Department of Justice 2/12/81 I Washington, 'D. C. 20531 I l i iii Ii 7r o PREFACE The Mississippi Courts Finance Study was conducted by Ernest H. Short & Associates, Inc. under contract with the Mississippi JUdicial Council I with support of funds from the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration of the U.S. Department of Justice. The points of view and opinions in the report series are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position THE MISSISSIPPI COURTS FINANCE STUDY or policies of the Mississippi Judicial Councilor the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisdiction to Pronounce Null a Marriage Celebrated in Another State Or Foreign Country 1 T HE Supreme Court of California in Mayer V
    California Law Review Volume XVIII JANUARY, 1930 Number 2 Jurisdiction to Pronounce Null a Marriage Celebrated in Another State or Foreign Country 1 T HE Supreme Court of California in Mayer v. Mayer has given utterance to a dictum that deserves more than passing mention. It is as follows: "Since the validity of marriage is generally deter- mined by the law of the state where the marriage took place, there are cogent reasons why annulment should be sought in the tribunals of that state." It is the latter part of the statement that we believe merits attention. If the learned Justice in the Mayer case means that a court of the state or country where the marriage was celebrated may set it aside, provided both parties are properly before that court, one may not be tempted to quarrel with his statement, but if he means to give support to the opinion that it should have exclusive jurisdiction to annul such marriages irrespective of the residence or domicile of the parties to the suit, he lends some approval to a highly questionable proposition. Unfortunately that proposition has been championed by a few American writers of great learning and ability, and has been ten- tatively adopted by the American Law Institute in its Restatement of Conflict of Laws.2 It is, we believe, a doctrine that, notwithstanding its distinguished defenders, is without substantial support in adjudicated cases; that rests on no solid reason in theory or convenience; and that is calculated, if it should be given credence, to effect much practical injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report 1988 Xi FIGURE D: Criminal Case Unit of Count Used by the State Trial Courts
    AJIIL State court T caseload statistics: Annual Report 1988 Wyoming Conference of State Court Administrators Alabama Alaska Arizl :alifornia Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida laho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Mary1 Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevad; ew Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohia C 'ennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota ' tah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming ourt Administrators Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Coll elaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois In Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Mint lissouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New orth Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Pui ;land South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Conference of State Court Administratc Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District1 1 NCSC 1 KF i A joint effort of the Conference of State Court Administrators i 180 , .c74 I and the National Center for State Courts : 1988 I c. 2 I bu .CT q IC1 bS glib state court c ,a-- T caseload statistics: Annual Report, 1988 Funding Provided by the STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE Grant Number SJI 88-07X-067 ~pdcJ-3-clO A joint effort of the Conference of State Court Administrators, State Justice Institute, and the National Center for State Courts’ Court Statistics Project February 1990 Library National Center for State Courts 300 Newport Av~. WilIiarnsburg, VA 231 87-8798 Copyright@by The National Center for State Courts ISBN 0-89656-097-X National Center Publication No. R-115 This report was developed under Grant SJI-88-07X-067 from the State Justice Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • The Staff of the Office of the Attorney General State of Mississippi 2007 a Message from Attorney General Jim Hood
    THE STAFF OF THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2007 A MESSAGE FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JIM HOOD Dear Fellow Mississippians: It is with a great sense of accomplishment that I present to you our annual report for FY2007. This report encompasses the crux of the work we have accomplished during my fourth year in office. Our investigative labors and increased manpower have yielded a record number of Home Repair Fraud arrests over the past year. I hope you will especially take time to review all of the good things coming from our Consumer Protection Division. It is the heart of what we do every day, working to serve you, the citizens of our state. This fiscal year, we opened the doors to the Mississippi Cyber Crime Fusion Center, the first facility of its kind nationwide. The center houses federal, state and local law enforcement agencies dedicated to fighting internet crime. We must be diligent and progressive in our efforts to reduce this escalating area of criminal activity. It is at the forefront of my agenda during the next four years. New to the Attorney General’s Office is the Domestic Violence Division, a resource for law enforcement, prosecutors, judges and all other individuals or entities providing services to domestic violence victims within the State of Mississippi. This division brings a cohesiveness to the state’s efforts in fighting domestic violence, for which Mississippi ranks 2nd in the nation. I am proud to report to you that during the fiscal year, we retrieved almost $27 Million of embezzled and misused funds owed to the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Barnewsfall2014.Pdf
    VOL. LXI FALL 2014 NO. 1 Front Row: Mark B. Higdon; Mark A. Bilbrey; John T. Cossar; Rande K. Yeager; J.M. “Mike” Sellari Back Row: J. Walter Michel; James M. Ingram; Robert Lampton; Harry M. Walker; W. Parrish Fortenberry; Ronnie Smith; Chip Triplett; Stewart R. Speed; Larry E. Favreau We may dress casually, but we’re serious about your title business. Title insurance isn’t something you trust to just anybody. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of the most respected business leaders around for our board of directors. eir vision and integrity have helped make Mississippi Valley Title the leading title insurance company in Mississippi. Add to that our sta’s local knowledge and experience and you have a very serious title insurance partner. Call us today. 601.969.0222 | 800.647.2124 | www.mvt.com Expert underwriters to help you navigate complicated transactions Another reason why Stewart is the right underwriter for you. Choose Stewart Title Guaranty Company as your underwriter, and you’ll be able to call upon the unsurpassed experience of our underwriting team. With hundreds of years of cumulative experience, our experts have the in-depth knowledge necessary to guide you through complex issues. Plus, Stewart also provides our issuing agencies with access to Virtual Underwriter ®, our online resource that provides 24/7 access to all the information needed to close a transaction. Contact us today for more information on why Stewart is the right underwriter for you. (601) 977-9776 stewart.com/mississippi Danny L. Crotwell, Esq. Sean M. Culhane, Esq.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairness As a General Principle of American Constitutional Law: Applying Extra-Constitutional Principles to Constitutional Cases in Hendricks and M.L.B
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 33 Issue 1 Dedicated to the U.S. Supreme Court Fall 1997 Fairness As a General Principle of American Constitutional Law: Applying Extra-Constitutional Principles to Constitutional Cases in Hendricks and M.L.B. Larry Cata Backer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Larry C. Backer, Fairness As a General Principle of American Constitutional Law: Applying Extra- Constitutional Principles to Constitutional Cases in Hendricks and M.L.B., 33 Tulsa L. J. 135 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol33/iss1/10 This Supreme Court Review Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Backer: Fairness As a General Principle of American Constitutional Law: A FAIRNESS AS A GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: APPLYING EXTRA-CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES TO CONSTITUTIONAL CASES IN HENDRICKS AND M.L.B.* Larry Cat Backert We speak the unifying language of fairness in law-making in the late twentieth century. This is the age of due process. The language offairness provides the unifying glue to our law making.1 It is almost a cliche today that, at its limit, all legal categories explode. It is also a commonplace that legal categories tend to be shoved to their limit over the course of time, unless the categories are redefined or destroyed by the weight of their own expansiveness.2 These quasi-biological truisms affect not only statutory and common law legal categories, but increasingly, constitutional categories as well.
    [Show full text]
  • V. List of References
    LIST OF REFERENCES General Gambling Information Abt, V., Smith, J., and Christiansen, E. The Business of International Gaming Institute, University of Nevada, Las Risk: Commercial Gambling in Mainstream America. Vegas. The Gaming Industry: Introduction and Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas (1985). Perspectives. New York: John Wiley & Sons (1996). Minnesota Planning. Minnesota Gambling 1993. St. Paul, Blakey, G. and Kurland, H. Development of the Federal MN: Minnesota Planning (May 1993). Law of Gambling. Cornell Law Review, 63:923 (1978). Kusyszyn, Igor. “The Psychology of Gambling,” Annals of Brenner, R. and Brenner, G. Gambling and Speculation: A the American Academy of Political and Social Science Theory, a History and a Future of Some Human Decisions. 474:133-145 (July 1984). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (1990). Public Agenda. Gambling: Is it a Problem? What Should Christiansen, E. The United States Gross Annual Wager. We Do? An Issue Book for National Issues Forums. International Gaming & Wagering Business. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company (1998) Cozic, C. and Winters, P. (eds.) Gambling. San Diego, Rose, I. Gambling and the Law. Los Angeles: Gambling CA: Greenhaven Press (1995). Times (1986). Davis, Bertha. Gambling in America: A Growth Industry. Rose, I. The Impact of American Laws on Foreign Legal An Impact Book. New York: Franklin Watts (1992). Gambling, New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8(1):129-166 (1986). Detlefsen, Robert R. Wagers of Sin. Reason, pp. 24-30 (December 1997). Rose, I. The Rise and Fall of the Third Wave: Gambling Will Be Outlawed in Forty Years. In Eadington (ed.) Detlefsen, Robert R.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Annual Report
    A MESSAGE FROM CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIAM L. WALLER, JR. The judiciary has worked extremely hard to secure adequate funding for the judicial branch of govern- ment, while providing an efficient, cost effective system of justice for the people of the state of Mississippi. The entire appropriation allocated this co-equal branch of state government represents less than 1 percent of the state’s general fund. The 2015 Legislature created seven new trial judge positions as part of its required redistricting. Those new judges began serving in January 2016. The Legislature also authorized pay raises of up to $18,000 a year for court reporters, to be awarded according to longevity and implemented over three years. Much of the work of the judicial branch relies on special funds. The judiciary continues to expand be- yond the traditional courtroom and chambers work with special programs tailored to address specific public needs. Drug courts, which reached statewide coverage in early 2013, continue to be the most successful innovation of the state judiciary. These programs save an estimated $46 million annually in incarceration costs, and save mil- lions more in avoided health and social services expenses for people who are working and supporting themselves and their families. However, our drug courts cannot sustain themselves on the special assessments which were put in place during the early years of the drug court movement. Mississippi Electronic Courts continues to expand into more courts. MEC, an electronic filing system which operated in total of 37 trial courts in 25 counties at the end of 2015, receives no state General Fund appropriation.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert E. Myles (662) 324­2419
    1112 Oriole Drive Starkville, MS 39759 Albert E. Myles (662) 324­2419 EDUCATION Ph.D. in Agricultural Economics with a minor in General Economics, Mississippi State University, December 1984. M.A. in Food and Resource Economics with a minor in Agricultural Marketing, University of Florida, December 1980. B.S. in Agricultural Economics, Alcorn State University, May 1978. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Member of the Mississippi Association of County Agricultural Agents (MACAA) Member of the MACAA Board of Directors President of MACAA Policy Committee (2007) Member of the newly formed National Association of Community Development Professionals (NACDEP) Member of the Southern Association of Agricultural Economics Member of Tri­State Planning Group Member of Hall of Learning 4­H Club Member of Mississippi Volunteer Leaders Association Member of the Community Development Society Professional Workers Agricultural Workers Conference (PWAC) Member of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Member of the Academy of Economic and Finance. Duties in the association include: chair workshop sessions and present papers. Member of the Southwestern Economics Association. Duties include chairing workshop sessions and presenting papers. Member Mississippi Agricultural Economics Association PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT Participated in a 1­hour session titled “Classroom Management” hosted by the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) at MSU, October 2007. Participated in a 1­day Bureau of the Census 2000 Training Course 2, 2003. Participated in a 1­day Agri­Tourism Training Course 2, 2003. Participated in a 3­day National Training Course on Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) and received, 2003 certification as a BR&E Consultant, October 2002. Participated in a 5­day Community Development Institute Course, September 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • White Manhood in Louisiana During Reconstruction, 1865-1877 Arthur Wendel Stout Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2015 White Manhood in Louisiana During Reconstruction, 1865-1877 Arthur Wendel Stout Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Stout, Arthur Wendel, "White Manhood in Louisiana During Reconstruction, 1865-1877" (2015). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3681. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3681 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. WHITE MANHOOD IN LOUISIANA DURING RECONSTRUCTION, 1865-1877 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Arthur Wendel Stout IV B.A., St. John’s College, 2003 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 December 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people helped make this dissertation possible. My advisor, Dr. Alecia P. Long gave me a lot of good advice and asked questions that helped me see historic familial relationships in different ways. Dr. Long was patient with the time I took to gather my thoughts coherently into the work presented here. Dr. Gaines M. Foster taught me a great deal about historiography and the spirit of our profession. Dr. David H. Culbert strengthened my understanding that the creation and presentation of images is almost as important as the underlying message.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Counsel in Mississippi Evaluation of Adult Felony Trial Level Indigent Defense Services
    The Right to Counsel in Mississippi Evaluation of Adult Felony Trial Level Indigent Defense Services MARCH 2018 SIXTH AMENDMENT 6AC CENTER The Right to Counsel in Mississippi: Evaluation of Adult Felony Trial Level Indigent Defense Services Copyright © 2018 by the Sixth Amendment Center. All rights reserved. Publication Number: 2018.001 SIXTH AMENDMENT CENTER P.O. Box 15556 Boston, MA 02215 www.sixthamendment.org PREPARED BY The Sixth Amendment Center (6AC) is a non-partisan, non-profit organization providing technical assistance and evaluation services to policymakers and criminal justice stakeholders. Its services focus on the constitutional requirement to provide effective assistance of counsel to the indigent accused facing a potential loss of liberty in a criminal or delinquency proceeding at all critical stages of a case. For this evaluation, the 6AC worked in partnership with the Defender Initiative of the Seattle University School of Law (SUSL). The Defender Initiative is part of the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, whose mission is to advance justice and equality through a unified vision that combines research, advocacy, and education. DISCLAIMER The Mississippi Public Defender Task Force commissioned this report. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) funded the work through the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Answering Gideon’s Call: National Assistance To Improve the Effectiveness of Right to Counsel Services (DOJ Office of Justice Programs Grant Award #: 2013-MU-BX-k002.) The report solely reflects the opinions of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Mississippi Public Defender Task Force or the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of the Blog
    Robertson + Associates A Divorce and Family Law Firm The Blog 2010 - 2015 About Divorce: Mississippi Temporary Hearings in Mississippi….………………………………………………………….5 Mississippi Hates Divorce…………………………………………………………………….….7 Ten Things About Divorce in Mississippi………….…………………………………………...8 Legal Separation in Mississippi………………………………………………………………...10 Elements Irreconcilable Differences……………………………………………………………………….11 Fault……………………………………………………………………………………………….13 Habitual Cruel and Inhuman Conduct………………………………………………………..14 Prenuptial Agreement? How Romantic ………………………………………………………15 All My Money…………………….………………………………………………………………17 Reasons and Choices Adultery………………………………………………………………………………...19 Cell Phone Bills Can Talk………………........................................…………………...20 Note to Self: Close the Blinds………………………….………………………………22 Moth to a Flame………………………………………………………………………...24 Top 5 Places People That Cheat Meet………………………………….……………..26 The Strongest Drug Known to Man…………..….……………………………...……28 Uber and Technology in Divorce...................................................................................30 The Jig is Up………………………..……………………………………………………32 A Bird in the Hand is Worth Two in the Bush………………………………………………...33 It is Cheaper to Keep Her…………………………………………………….………………….34 Supply and Demand………………………………......................……………………………….36 Psychos, Sociopaths and Narcissists…………………………………...………………………..38 What to Expect A Straight Razor Shave and Divorce……………………..………………………………..……40 The Grief Cycle in Divorce……..…………………………………………………...……………42 A Man and His
    [Show full text]