Ms Barnewsfall2014.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Executive Summary 111111.25 '"111.4 II
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. "r,'"_" , -" .~,- ~ 7 '~~ :;-~ ~-.. ,j National Criminal Justice Reference Service i ---------------~~--------------------------------------------~ r , ,i Prepared for the ""I I , Mississippi Judicial Council "f nCJrs This microfiche was produced frQm documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, fjl, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on Th~ Mississippi Court Finance Study this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. I , I Executive Summary 111111.25 '"111.4 II MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU Of STANDARDS-196;>-A Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with i I the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. i Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not represent the official I position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. I \----J Date Filmed Ernest H. Short March, 1980 National Institute of ,Justice I &Associates, Inc. United States Department of Justice 2/12/81 I Washington, 'D. C. 20531 I l i iii Ii 7r o PREFACE The Mississippi Courts Finance Study was conducted by Ernest H. Short & Associates, Inc. under contract with the Mississippi JUdicial Council I with support of funds from the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration of the U.S. Department of Justice. The points of view and opinions in the report series are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position THE MISSISSIPPI COURTS FINANCE STUDY or policies of the Mississippi Judicial Councilor the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. -
Jurisdiction to Pronounce Null a Marriage Celebrated in Another State Or Foreign Country 1 T HE Supreme Court of California in Mayer V
California Law Review Volume XVIII JANUARY, 1930 Number 2 Jurisdiction to Pronounce Null a Marriage Celebrated in Another State or Foreign Country 1 T HE Supreme Court of California in Mayer v. Mayer has given utterance to a dictum that deserves more than passing mention. It is as follows: "Since the validity of marriage is generally deter- mined by the law of the state where the marriage took place, there are cogent reasons why annulment should be sought in the tribunals of that state." It is the latter part of the statement that we believe merits attention. If the learned Justice in the Mayer case means that a court of the state or country where the marriage was celebrated may set it aside, provided both parties are properly before that court, one may not be tempted to quarrel with his statement, but if he means to give support to the opinion that it should have exclusive jurisdiction to annul such marriages irrespective of the residence or domicile of the parties to the suit, he lends some approval to a highly questionable proposition. Unfortunately that proposition has been championed by a few American writers of great learning and ability, and has been ten- tatively adopted by the American Law Institute in its Restatement of Conflict of Laws.2 It is, we believe, a doctrine that, notwithstanding its distinguished defenders, is without substantial support in adjudicated cases; that rests on no solid reason in theory or convenience; and that is calculated, if it should be given credence, to effect much practical injustice. -
State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report 1988 Xi FIGURE D: Criminal Case Unit of Count Used by the State Trial Courts
AJIIL State court T caseload statistics: Annual Report 1988 Wyoming Conference of State Court Administrators Alabama Alaska Arizl :alifornia Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida laho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Mary1 Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevad; ew Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohia C 'ennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota ' tah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming ourt Administrators Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Coll elaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois In Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Mint lissouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New orth Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Pui ;land South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Conference of State Court Administratc Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District1 1 NCSC 1 KF i A joint effort of the Conference of State Court Administrators i 180 , .c74 I and the National Center for State Courts : 1988 I c. 2 I bu .CT q IC1 bS glib state court c ,a-- T caseload statistics: Annual Report, 1988 Funding Provided by the STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE Grant Number SJI 88-07X-067 ~pdcJ-3-clO A joint effort of the Conference of State Court Administrators, State Justice Institute, and the National Center for State Courts’ Court Statistics Project February 1990 Library National Center for State Courts 300 Newport Av~. WilIiarnsburg, VA 231 87-8798 Copyright@by The National Center for State Courts ISBN 0-89656-097-X National Center Publication No. R-115 This report was developed under Grant SJI-88-07X-067 from the State Justice Institute. -
The Voting Rights Act and Mississippi: 1965–2006
THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT AND MISSISSIPPI: 1965–2006 ROBERT MCDUFF* INTRODUCTION Mississippi is the poorest state in the union. Its population is 36% black, the highest of any of the fifty states.1 Resistance to the civil rights movement was as bitter and violent there as anywhere. State and local of- ficials frequently erected obstacles to prevent black people from voting, and those obstacles were a centerpiece of the evidence presented to Con- gress to support passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.2 After the Act was passed, Mississippi’s government worked hard to undermine it. In its 1966 session, the state legislature changed a number of the voting laws to limit the influence of the newly enfranchised black voters, and Mississippi officials refused to submit those changes for preclearance as required by Section 5 of the Act.3 Black citizens filed a court challenge to several of those provisions, leading to the U.S. Supreme Court’s watershed 1969 de- cision in Allen v. State Board of Elections, which held that the state could not implement the provisions, unless they were approved under Section 5.4 Dramatic changes have occurred since then. Mississippi has the high- est number of black elected officials in the country. One of its four mem- bers in the U.S. House of Representatives is black. Twenty-seven percent of the members of the state legislature are black. Many of the local gov- ernmental bodies are integrated, and 31% of the members of the county governing boards, known as boards of supervisors, are black.5 * Civil rights and voting rights lawyer in Mississippi. -
Fairness As a General Principle of American Constitutional Law: Applying Extra-Constitutional Principles to Constitutional Cases in Hendricks and M.L.B
Tulsa Law Review Volume 33 Issue 1 Dedicated to the U.S. Supreme Court Fall 1997 Fairness As a General Principle of American Constitutional Law: Applying Extra-Constitutional Principles to Constitutional Cases in Hendricks and M.L.B. Larry Cata Backer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Larry C. Backer, Fairness As a General Principle of American Constitutional Law: Applying Extra- Constitutional Principles to Constitutional Cases in Hendricks and M.L.B., 33 Tulsa L. J. 135 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol33/iss1/10 This Supreme Court Review Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Backer: Fairness As a General Principle of American Constitutional Law: A FAIRNESS AS A GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: APPLYING EXTRA-CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES TO CONSTITUTIONAL CASES IN HENDRICKS AND M.L.B.* Larry Cat Backert We speak the unifying language of fairness in law-making in the late twentieth century. This is the age of due process. The language offairness provides the unifying glue to our law making.1 It is almost a cliche today that, at its limit, all legal categories explode. It is also a commonplace that legal categories tend to be shoved to their limit over the course of time, unless the categories are redefined or destroyed by the weight of their own expansiveness.2 These quasi-biological truisms affect not only statutory and common law legal categories, but increasingly, constitutional categories as well. -
Supreme Court Annual Report
A MESSAGE FROM CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIAM L. WALLER, JR. The judiciary has worked extremely hard to secure adequate funding for the judicial branch of govern- ment, while providing an efficient, cost effective system of justice for the people of the state of Mississippi. The entire appropriation allocated this co-equal branch of state government represents less than 1 percent of the state’s general fund. The 2015 Legislature created seven new trial judge positions as part of its required redistricting. Those new judges began serving in January 2016. The Legislature also authorized pay raises of up to $18,000 a year for court reporters, to be awarded according to longevity and implemented over three years. Much of the work of the judicial branch relies on special funds. The judiciary continues to expand be- yond the traditional courtroom and chambers work with special programs tailored to address specific public needs. Drug courts, which reached statewide coverage in early 2013, continue to be the most successful innovation of the state judiciary. These programs save an estimated $46 million annually in incarceration costs, and save mil- lions more in avoided health and social services expenses for people who are working and supporting themselves and their families. However, our drug courts cannot sustain themselves on the special assessments which were put in place during the early years of the drug court movement. Mississippi Electronic Courts continues to expand into more courts. MEC, an electronic filing system which operated in total of 37 trial courts in 25 counties at the end of 2015, receives no state General Fund appropriation. -
Montgomery, C. R. "Bob" Papers
Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Congressional and Political Research Center CPRC Finding Aids (CPRC) April 2021 Montgomery, C. R. "Bob" Papers Mississippi State University Libraries Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/cprc-findingaids Recommended Citation Mississippi State University Libraries, "Montgomery, C. R. "Bob" Papers" (2021). CPRC Finding Aids. 12. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/cprc-findingaids/12 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Congressional and Political Research Center (CPRC) at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in CPRC Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Montgomery, C. R. "Bob" Papers This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on June 19, 2017. English Describing Archives: A Content Standard Mississippi State University Libraries P.O. Box 5408 Mississippi State 39762 [email protected] URL: http://library.msstate.edu/specialcollections Montgomery, C. R. "Bob" Papers Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical/Historical note .......................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Contents note .............................................................................................................................. -
4 ) K- Refuge Manager Date
REVIEW AND APPROVALS YAZOO NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX Hollandale, Mississippi ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1986 _ • 4 ) k- Refuge manager Date/ Regional Office Approval Date w INTRODUCTION 0 Yazoo National Wildlife Refuge is located in the heart of Mississippi's delta region about 30 miles south of Greenville, MS, and about five air miles east of the Mississippi River in Washington County . Land acquisition began under authority of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Migratory Hunting Stamp Act in 1936 with the initial purchase of 2,166 acres . In March, 1937, an additional 639 acres were purchased with plans to acquire about 20,000 acres . Problems with a local drainage district resulted in a delay of official activation and assignment of a Manager until late in 1956 . The Service was given permission to purchase additional land in 1960 under the provision of Section 5928 of the Mississippi Code of 1942, recompiled, by Governor Ross R . Barnett . Varied acreages were purchased from individuals and/or clubs until a total of 12,471 acres were acquired with the purchase of 138 .2 acres on July 30, 1969, from Mrs . Susie B . Law . In the early 1900's through the 1940's, the natural habitat supplimented by agricultural crops provided excellent waterfowl hunting in and around the refuge area . People came from as far away as New England 0 to partake of the sport . Permits indicate that the area abounded in ducks, geese, and swans throughout the wintering season . Initially, Yazoo was established as a link in the chain of refuges throughout the Mississippi flyway with special emphasis on wintering habitat for ducks and geese . -
Remarks of Senator Bob Dole Hayes Dent Farm Rally April 8, 1993
This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu REMARKS OF SENATOR BOB DOLE HAYES DENT FARM RALLY APRIL 8, 1993 1 Page 1 of 85 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu CLINTON'S PACKAGE ** PRESIDENT CLINTON IS--TO HIS CREDIT--DOING QUITE A SALES JOB, ON A TAX AND SPEND PACKAGE THAT NOT ONLY INCLUDES THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN HISTORY BUT ALSO REPRESENTS A NOT-TOO- THINLY VEILED ATTACK ON PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE. IF 2 Page 2 of 85 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu FARMERS WERE PERCEIVED AS A LIBERAL SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP, THINGS MIGHT BE DIFFERENT--YOU MIGHT BE AT THE FRONT OF THE LINE RECEIVING A HANDOUT. ** BUT THAT IS NOT THE CASE. ALL OF US ARE COMMITTED TO DEFICIT REDUCTION, BUT WE 3 Page 3 of 85 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu CANNOT BALANCE THE BUDGET ON THE BACKS OF AGRICULTURE AND DEFENSE ALONE. FARM SPENDING TOOK THE ONLY REAL CUTS OUT OF THE 1990 BUDGET AGREEMENT, AND NOW A NEW PRESIDENT HAS HIS SIGHTS SET ON YOU AGAIN. HERE'S THE PLAN: 4 Page 4 of 85 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu BUDGET CUTS ** THE SPENDING CUTS AS PROPOSED BY THE PRESIDENT WOULD HAVE A DEVASTATING EFFECT ON PRODUCERS, ESPECIALLY THOSE ALREADY ON THE MARGIN. -
The Right to Counsel in Mississippi Evaluation of Adult Felony Trial Level Indigent Defense Services
The Right to Counsel in Mississippi Evaluation of Adult Felony Trial Level Indigent Defense Services MARCH 2018 SIXTH AMENDMENT 6AC CENTER The Right to Counsel in Mississippi: Evaluation of Adult Felony Trial Level Indigent Defense Services Copyright © 2018 by the Sixth Amendment Center. All rights reserved. Publication Number: 2018.001 SIXTH AMENDMENT CENTER P.O. Box 15556 Boston, MA 02215 www.sixthamendment.org PREPARED BY The Sixth Amendment Center (6AC) is a non-partisan, non-profit organization providing technical assistance and evaluation services to policymakers and criminal justice stakeholders. Its services focus on the constitutional requirement to provide effective assistance of counsel to the indigent accused facing a potential loss of liberty in a criminal or delinquency proceeding at all critical stages of a case. For this evaluation, the 6AC worked in partnership with the Defender Initiative of the Seattle University School of Law (SUSL). The Defender Initiative is part of the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, whose mission is to advance justice and equality through a unified vision that combines research, advocacy, and education. DISCLAIMER The Mississippi Public Defender Task Force commissioned this report. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) funded the work through the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Answering Gideon’s Call: National Assistance To Improve the Effectiveness of Right to Counsel Services (DOJ Office of Justice Programs Grant Award #: 2013-MU-BX-k002.) The report solely reflects the opinions of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Mississippi Public Defender Task Force or the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance. -
To View the Complete Study As an Adobe Acrobat PDF
American Enterprise Institute The Project on Fair Representation Edward Blum Visiting Fellow American Enterprise Institute 1150 Seventeenth St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202.862.5800 An Assessment of Voting Rights Progress in Mississippi Executive Summary By Edward Blum Of all the states of the South and all of the states subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, Mississippi has had the longest journey from out of the darkness of segregation and racial subjugation. Early in the 1960s Mississippi had the lowest rates of black voter registration and participation maintained by the most unabashedly violent and vehement efforts to deny black suffrage. By the beginning of the 21st century, proportionally more blacks than whites were registered to vote in Mississippi, and for two decades Mississippi blacks have registered to vote at higher rates than African-Americans outside the South. Until recently Mississippi whites voted at higher rates than blacks, though the difference between the races has largely been eliminated as of 1998. Mississippi blacks often turn out at rates higher than blacks in the rest of the country. 1 Mississippi has the highest proportion black population of the United States, though the state has fewer African Americans than in New York City. With approximately 900 officials, blacks hold more public office in the Magnolia State than elsewhere, and a black person is more likely to be represented by or to get to vote for a black officeholder in Mississippi than anywhere else in the US. Since 1987, an African-American has represented the majority-black Delta congressional district. Black representation is approaching proportionality in the state House of Representatives, though the black proportion in the state Senate still lags. -
Office of the Attorney General State of Mississippi 2016 Annual Report
MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL 2016 Office of the Attorney General State of Mississippi 2016 Annual Report Attorney General Jim Hood 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Page 1 MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL A Message from Attorney General Jim Hood Dear Fellow Mississippians, This past January, I had the great privilege to be sworn in to my fourth term as Attorney General. I am humbled and honored by the confidence that the state’s voters have shown in me. As Mississippi’s chief legal officer, I lead a team of dedicated professionals, all of whom are committed to protecting our great state. As I begin my 14th year in office, I am pleased to present to you the annual report from my office for Fiscal Year 2016. Since I took office, rapid changes to technology have given criminals and con artists new ways to prey upon citizens. However, I am proud that our office has met the challenge of these modern problems. We use sophisticated investigative tools to track down cyber criminals and child predators. We strive to stay a step ahead of those who would attempt to take advantage of Mississippi residents. As we respond to new threats, we continue to investigate and prosecute new cases, assist consumers and crime victims, and train law enforcement officers and prosecutors. The attorneys, investigators, program managers, and support staff who serve you in the Attorney General's Office are among the most accomplished and experienced public servants in the nation. This year, two of them were singled out for national recognition. Paula Broome, Bureau of Victim Assistance, was recognized by the American Bar Association for her service to victims of domestic violence.