DOCSLIB.ORG

Haçlilar Karşisinda Ilk Türk Lideri: Sultan I. Kiliçarslan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Haçlilar Karşisinda Ilk Türk Lideri: Sultan I. Kiliçarslan BIRSEL KÜÇÜKSIPAHIOĞLU / Şarkiyat Mecmuası Sayı 26 (2015-1) 63-83 63 HAÇLILAR KARŞISINDA İLK TÜRK LİDERİ: SULTAN I. KILIÇARSLAN Birsel KÜÇÜKSİPAHİOĞLU* Öz: Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti’nin kurucusu Süleymanşah’ın oğlu olan Sultan I. Kılıç Arslan, Büyük Selçuklu Sultanı Melikşah’ın 1092’de ölü- münden sonra İznik’e gelerek 1093 yılından itibaren İznik merkezli Tür- kiye Selçuklu Devleti’ni yönetmeye başlamıştır. Türk birliğini yeniden kurmaya çalışan, Bizans İmparatorluğu‘na karşı güçlenme çabası için de olan ve ülkesini genişletme gayretleri ile dikkatleri üzerine çeken sultanın Türkleri Anadolu’dan atmak için gelen Haçlı ordularıyla mücadelesi ola- ğan üstü bir kahramanlık olarak kayıtlara geçmiştir. Haçlıların karşılaştığı ilk Türk lideri olan Sultan I. Kılıç Arslan, Birinci Haçlı Seferi’nin öncü gruplarını 21 Ekim 1096’da Drakon Savaşı’nda büyük yenilgiye uğratmış, arkadan gelen ve Türkiye Selçuklu başkenti İznik’i kuşatan seferin büyük ordularını ise buradan uzaklaştırmak için mücadele vermiş ardından da Dorylaion önlerinde Haçlıları durdurmak için büyük gayret göstermiştir. Çok çaba sarfetmesine rağmen Birinci Haçlı Seferi’ni burada sonlandıra- mayan sultan bunun intikamını 1101 Yılı Haçlı Seferleri’nde almış ve yüz- binlerle ifade edilen Haçlı ordularını Türk beylerinin de desteği ile Anadolu içlerinde yenilgiye uğratarak yok etmeyi başarmıştır. Böylece Kılıç Arslan, azim, cesaret, ileri görüşlülük ve kararlılık gibi liderlik vasıflarıyla hareket edip Haçlılara Türklerin Anadolu’dan atılamayacağını, bu toprakların Türk yurdu olduğunu ispatlayarak buraların değil işgali geçmenin bile mümkün olamayacağını göstermiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sultan I. Kılıç Arslan, Haçlılar, Drakon Savaşı, Dorylaion Savaşı, 1101 Yılı Haçlı Seferleri. * Prof. Dr., İstanbul Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü, Ortaçağ Tarihi Anabilim Dalı ([email protected]).. 64 HAÇLILAR KARŞISINDA İLK TÜRK LİDERİ: SULTAN I. KILIÇARSLAN THE FIRST TURKISH LEADER AGAINST THE CRUSADERS: SULTAN KILIJ ARSLAN I Abstract: Sultan Kilij Arslan I, son of Suleyman Shah, the founder of Seljuk Sultanate of Rum, came to Nicaea following death of Sultan Ma- lik-Shah of Great Seljuk Empire in 1092, and started to rule the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum based in Nicaea. The Sultan who was recognized for his efforts to re-establish Turkish union, hold a stronger position against the Byzantine Empire and expand his lands outstandingly stood against the Crusader Armies that campaigned to throw Turks out of Anatolia, and challenged them which was recorded as a great heroism. Sultan Kilij Ar- slan I, the first Turkish leader that the Crusaders confronted, overwhelmed the vanguard units of the First Crusade in the Battle of Civetot in October 21, 1096, and fought for repelling the subsequent big armies that besieged Nicaea, capital city of Sultanate of Rum, and then he showed outstanding efforts to halt the Crusaders at Dorylaeum. The Sultan, who had failed to bring an end to the First Crusade in spite of his outstanding efforts, took his revenge in the Crusade of 1101, and succeeded in defeating and destroying the crusaders armies comprised of hundreds of thousands of soldiers in the interiors of Anatolia with the aid of Turkish beys (chieftains). Thus, Kilij Arslan well displayed determination, courage, farsightedness and decisive- ness which are considered as leadership characteristics, and proved that it was not possible to repel Turks from Anatolia, and those lands would be Turkish homeland which could not even be passed through let alone occupying it. Keywords: Sultan Kilij Arslan I, Crusaders, Battle of Civetot, Battle of Dorylaeum, the Crusade of 1101. 1. Arrival of Sultan Kilij Arslan I at Nicaea and His First Actions Sultan Kilij Arslan I was son of Suleyman Shah, the conqueror of Anato- lia and founder of Seljuk Sultanate of Rum. He was recognized for his efforts to re-establish the dissolved Turkish union, hold a stronger position against the Byzantine Empire, and expand his lands. His fight against the Crusader armies that campaigned starting from 1096 in order to throw Turks out of Anatolia was an outstanding heroic deed. As an important detail, he was also the first Turkish leader to confront the Crusaders. BIRSEL KÜÇÜKSIPAHIOĞLU / Şarkiyat Mecmuası Sayı 26 (2015-1) 63-83 65 Thought to be born in or before 1085, Sultan Kilij Arslan I was known to accompany his father Suleyman Shah when he campaigned to conquer Anti- och, and stayed in Antioch after Suleyman Shah lost his life in 1086 in his fight against Tutush. However, Kilij Arslan left Antioch after Sultan Malik-Shah of Great Seljuk Empire came there taking him back to Isfahan, and started to live in Isfahan together with his mother and brother Kulan Arslan. Kilij Arslan was only allowed to leave Isfahan upon consent of Sultan Barkiyaruq following death of Malik-Shah in 1092, and arrived at Nicaea together with his brother Kulan Arslan. Abu al-Ghazi who was in charge of the city after death of Suleyman Shah then submitted the city to him, thus he started to rule the Sultanate of Rum based in Nicaea starting from 1093. Kilij Arslan, who was called as Suleyman in the Crusader sources, first got into act to re-establish the dissolved Turkish union, and then expand in the terri- tory and build up more strength. This political policy would inevitably make him confront the Byzantine Empire. Indeed, the Sultan assigned Amir Muhammad as the army commander, sending him to and ordering him to capture the South- ern Marmara coasts of the empire. Against Muhammad who occupied cities of Kyzikos and Apollonias, the emperor sent a fleet commanded by Alexandros Eu- phorbenos for resistance. According to Byzantine Chronicler Anna Komnene, as the armada was not then ready, the emperor tried to build up a fleet with as many ships as he could find, loaded the soldiers in these ships and sent them to fight against Turks. With this fleet, the empire forces managed to besiege the city for 6 days but then retreated as they failed to succeed against Muhammad who con- tinued his struggle in the interior castle. Seeing that the empire forces were set to leave, Muhammad handed them a big defeat before they could leave the territory. What made Alexandros to make such a move was that Turks came to the aid of Muhammad, as a result of which the empire troops were understood to be insuf- ficient against such a unified power.1 When Kilij Arslan continued his fight against the empire, he also tried to con- solidate his position by marrying daughter of Chaka, a Turkish Bey who ruled Izmir and its vicinity, also involved in attempts against Byzantine to expand his * Assoc. Prof. Dr., Istanbul University - Faculty of Letters - Department of History - Medieval Ages Discipline. 1 Anna Komnene, Aleksiad, trans. Bilge Umar, Anna Kommene Alexiad, Istanbul, 1996, p. 206 et seq. See also: Osman Turan, Selçuklular Zamanında Türkiye, Istanbul 1993, p. 95-97; Işın Demirkent, Türkiye Selçuklu Hükümdarı Sultan I. Kılıç Arslan, Ankara, 1996, p. 15-16 66 HAÇLILAR KARŞISINDA İLK TÜRK LİDERİ: SULTAN I. KILIÇARSLAN lands. However, the Emperor turned to his usual tactics trying to bring him into to the fold and drive a wedge between Chaka Bey and the Sultan. In his letter he sent to Kilij Arslan, the Emperor claimed that he inherited the sultanate from his father, and Chaka had risen against the Empire but he was not able to fight the Empire so his actual target was the Sultan himself. Emperor Alexios claimed that sultanate of Kilij Arslan was therefore in danger, and he advised the Sultan to bring Chaka Bey to his knees, either peacefully or forcibly. Kilij Arslan, who ap- peared to be greatly concerned as a result of that letter, thought that Chaka could be a problem for him, and acted against Chaka who was then besieging Abydos. Simultaneously, the Empire put pressure on Chaka from the sea with its armada commanded by Constantine Dalassenos. Stuck in a very difficult situation, Chaka Bey went to Sultan to come to terms with him. As recorded by Anna Komnene, Chaka Bey was not aware that Kilij Arslan had a deal with the Emperor. First welcomed by Kilij Arslan, Chaka Bey was killed by Kilij Arslan when he was having meal on the same table with the Sultan. The alliance between the Empire and Kilij Arslan did not last long after death of Chaka because when the Emperor was fighting against the Kumans, Turks led by Kilij Arslan started to carry out raids on Bithynia region, the vicinity of Lake Sapanca. As those raids threatened Nicomedia, Alexios started to design a new project. The Emperor discovered that there was a trench extending from the south of Lake Sapanca to the coast, and ordered to deepen that trench in order to prevent Turkish raids on Nicomedia and its vicinity. He contemplated to fill the trench with lake water, thus preventing entry of Turks into the territory. However, arrival of the Crusaders prevented that project.2 2. Sultan Kilij Arslan I and His Fight against the Crusaders Emperor Alexios was forced to seek military aid from the West as did Em- peror Michael VII (1071-1078) in order to fight against Turks more effectively. Indeed, the Emperor knew that his power was not solely sufficient for fighting against Turks, and relied on the aid from West as the most effective way of re- pelling Turks from Anatolia and the Near East. The West, on the other hand, would hundreds of thousands, turning that offer into the Crusade. The call by Pope Urban II in the Council of Clermont in 1095 constituted the basis for the Crusades. Upon that call, the armies campaigned, and started to arrive at the 2 Anna Komnene, p. 269-271, 301-302.See also: Turan, ibid., p. 97-98; Demirkent, ibid., p. 17-19. BIRSEL KÜÇÜKSIPAHIOĞLU / Şarkiyat Mecmuası Sayı 26 (2015-1) 63-83 67 Imperial Capital, Constantinople, starting from 1096.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Arsenite Schism and the Babai Rebellion: Two Case Studies
    THE ARSENITE SCHISM AND THE BABAI REBELLION: TWO CASE STUDIES IN CENTER-PERIPHERY RELATIONS by Hüsamettin ŞİMŞİR Submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Sabancı University June 2018 © Hüsamettin Şimşir 2018 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE ARSENITE SCHISM AND THE BABAI REBELLION: TWO CASE STUDIES IN CENTER-PERIPHERY RELATIONS Hüsamettin Şimşir M.A Thesis, June 2018 Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Fac. Member Ferenc Péter Csirkés This thesis aims to present an analysis of the interaction between Christians and Muslims in the west of Asia Minor at the end of the 13th and the beginning of the 14th centuries after two religious-social movements in the Byzantine and the Rum Seljuk Empires, the Arsenite Schism and the Babai Rebellion. After the unsuccessful rebellion of the Babais, antinomian dervishes who had migrated to the west of Asia Minor because of a heavy oppression as well as inquisition by the state and had a different religious belief apart from the mainstream religious understanding of the center initiated missionary activities in the regions along the Byzantine border. Accordingly, these dervishes had joined the military activities of the Turcoman chieftains against the Byzantines and interacted with the local Christian population and religious figures. As a result of this religious interaction, messianic and ascetic beliefs were increasingly present among the Greek-speaking population as well as spiritual leaders of western Anatolia. Since such interfaith and cross- cultural interaction had a considerable impact on the course of all these events, this thesis focuses on them to create a better understanding of the appearance of the Hesychasm in the Byzantine spiritual environment in the later period.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LOGISTICS of the FIRST CRUSADE 1095-1099 a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Wester
    FEEDING VICTORY: THE LOGISTICS OF THE FIRST CRUSADE 1095-1099 A Thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Western Carolina University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By William Donald O’Dell, Jr. Director: Dr. Vicki Szabo Associate Professor of Ancient and Medieval History History Department Committee Members: Dr. David Dorondo, History Dr. Robert Ferguson, History October, 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members and director for their assistance and encouragements. In particular, Dr. Vicki Szabo, without whose guidance and feedback this thesis would not exist, Dr. David Dorondo, whose guidance on the roles of logistics in cavalry warfare have helped shaped this thesis’ handling of such considerations and Dr. Robert Ferguson whose advice and recommendations for environmental historiography helped shaped my understanding on how such considerations influence every aspect of history, especially military logistics. I also offer my warmest regards and thanks to my parents, brothers, and extended family for their continued support. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv Abstract ............................................................................................................................................v Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca
    ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY TÜLİN KAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk SERİN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe F. EROL (Hacı Bayram Veli Uni., Arkeoloji) Assist. Prof. Dr. Emine SÖKMEN (Hitit Uni., Arkeoloji) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Tülin Kaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) Kaya, Tülin Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Reign of Terror'
    ‘A Reign of Terror’ CUP Rule in Diyarbekir Province, 1913-1923 Uğur Ü. Üngör University of Amsterdam, Department of History Master’s thesis ‘Holocaust and Genocide Studies’ June 2005 ‘A Reign of Terror’ CUP Rule in Diyarbekir Province, 1913-1923 Uğur Ü. Üngör University of Amsterdam Department of History Master’s thesis ‘Holocaust and Genocide Studies’ Supervisors: Prof. Johannes Houwink ten Cate, Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies Dr. Karel Berkhoff, Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies June 2005 2 Contents Preface 4 Introduction 6 1 ‘Turkey for the Turks’, 1913-1914 10 1.1 Crises in the Ottoman Empire 10 1.2 ‘Nationalization’ of the population 17 1.3 Diyarbekir province before World War I 21 1.4 Social relations between the groups 26 2 Persecution of Christian communities, 1915 33 2.1 Mobilization and war 33 2.2 The ‘reign of terror’ begins 39 2.3 ‘Burn, destroy, kill’ 48 2.4 Center and periphery 63 2.5 Widening and narrowing scopes of persecution 73 3 Deportations of Kurds and settlement of Muslims, 1916-1917 78 3.1 Deportations of Kurds, 1916 81 3.2 Settlement of Muslims, 1917 92 3.3 The aftermath of the war, 1918 95 3.4 The Kemalists take control, 1919-1923 101 4 Conclusion 110 Bibliography 116 Appendix 1: DH.ŞFR 64/39 130 Appendix 2: DH.ŞFR 87/40 132 Appendix 3: DH.ŞFR 86/45 134 Appendix 4: Family tree of Y.A. 136 Maps 138 3 Preface A little less than two decades ago, in my childhood, I became fascinated with violence, whether it was children bullying each other in school, fathers beating up their daughters for sneaking out on a date, or the omnipresent racism that I did not understand at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seljuks of Anatolia: an Epigraphic Study
    American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Theses and Dissertations 2-1-2017 The Seljuks of Anatolia: An epigraphic study Salma Moustafa Azzam Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds Recommended Citation APA Citation Azzam, S. (2017).The Seljuks of Anatolia: An epigraphic study [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/656 MLA Citation Azzam, Salma Moustafa. The Seljuks of Anatolia: An epigraphic study. 2017. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/656 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Seljuks of Anatolia: An Epigraphic Study Abstract This is a study of the monumental epigraphy of the Anatolian Seljuk Sultanate, also known as the Sultanate of Rum, which emerged in Anatolia following the Great Seljuk victory in Manzikert against the Byzantine Empire in the year 1071.It was heavily weakened in the Battle of Köse Dağ in 1243 against the Mongols but lasted until the end of the thirteenth century. The history of this sultanate which survived many wars, the Crusades and the Mongol invasion is analyzed through their epigraphy with regard to the influence of political and cultural shifts. The identity of the sultanate and its sultans is examined with the use of their titles in their monumental inscriptions with an emphasis on the use of the language and vocabulary, and with the purpose of assessing their strength during different periods of their realm.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle of Michael the Syrian and the Armenian Version (1248): a Textual Comparison
    The Chronicle of Michael the Great, Patriarch of the Syrians Translated from Classical Armenian by Robert Bedrosian For Reverend Father Krikor Vardapet Maksoudian, who taught me the language Sources of the Armenian Tradition (Long Branch, N.J., 2013) This work is in the public domain. It may be copied and distributed freely. Maps: From Atlas Antiquus (Berlin, 1869) by Heinrich Kiepert: Asia Minor and Neighbors Syria Mesopotamia Greater Cappadocia Armenia and Neighbors Additional maps are available on the Maps page. Chronological tables are available on the Chronological Tables page. Translator's Preface Composite 1871 Edition 1870 Edition 1871 Edition (below) The Chronicle of Michael the Great, Patriarch of the Syrians The following Table of Contents for the Composite 1871 edition was created for the convenience of readers and is not part of the Armenian text. Author's Preface Sources Problems of Chronology Adam Seth Jared; Mt. Hermon Chaldean Kings Methusaleh Noah Sons of Noah and Their Lands Tower of Babel The Amazons Rulers of Babylon Abraham Shamiram (Semiramis) Jacob Moses Exodus Judges Saul Solomon The Queen of Sheba and Her Riddles Rulers after Solomon Tiglathpilesar Shalmaneser Darius, Daniel, Cyrus Xerxes, B.C. 486-465 Persian Kings Alexander, B.C. 356-323 Ptolemy, B.C. 323-285 Translators of the Bible Haykazean Kings Maccabees, B.C. 167-160 138 B.C. 90 B.C. Genealogy of Herod Barzaphran Julius Caesar, B.C. 100-44 Herod's Rule over the Jews Cleopatra, reigned B.C. 51-30 Birth of Jesus Coming of the Magi Selection of the Apostles Selection of the Disciples Philo, Jewish Sects Abgar, King of Edessa Claudius, A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants in Aziziye District (Erzurum, Turkey) Aziziye (Erzurum, Türkiye) İlçesindeki Tıbbi Bitkilerin Etnobotanik Çalışması
    Turk J Pharm Sci 2020;17(2):211-220 DOI: 10.4274/tjps.galenos.2019. 24392 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants in Aziziye District (Erzurum, Turkey) Aziziye (Erzurum, Türkiye) İlçesindeki Tıbbi Bitkilerin Etnobotanik Çalışması Songül KARAKAYA1*, Ahmet POLAT2, Özkan AKSAKAL2, Yusuf Ziya SÜMBÜLLÜ3, Ümit İNCEKARA2 1Atatürk University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacognosy, Erzurum, Turkey 2Atatürk University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Erzurum, Turkey 3Erzurum Technical University, Faculty of Literature, Department of Folklore, Erzurum, Turkey ABSTRACT Objectives: The present research was conducted to document the usage of medicinal plants, plant parts utilized, and methods of preparation by the people living in Aziziye district, situated in the western part of Erzurum. Materials and Methods: The medicinal plant species utilized by local public for remedial aims were collected and identified. The related knowledge about conventional herbal medicine was collected, herbarium materials were prepared, and they were deposited in the Herbarium of the Faculty of Science, Atatürk University. Results: A total of 77 medical plants pertaining to 30 families were defined in this research. Amongst these, 62 species grew naturally and 15 species were cultivated. The most widespread medicinal plant families were Asteraceae (14), Rosaceae (7), Lamiaceae (5), and Apiaceae (5). The most widespread preparation was decoction. Conclusion: The ethnobotanical outcomes documented in this study provide practical evidence about the use of medicinal plants among the inhabitants of Aziziye District. Furthermore, the results revealed that the medicinal plants of the region are a major source of herbal drugs for primary healthcare utilized among the rural communities. This study can be utilized as baseline knowledge for further scientific research to improve new plant-based commercial drugs, and may transfer the traditional information as regards usage of medicinal herbs to new generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Oleaster-Leafed Pear (Pyrus Elaeagrifolia Pall
    agronomy Article Characterization of Oleaster-Leafed Pear (Pyrus elaeagrifolia Pall. subsp. elaeagrifolia) Fruits in Turkey Halil Ibrahim Sagbas 1 , Gulce Ilhan 1, Sezai Ercisli 1 , Muhammad Akbar Anjum 2 and VojtˇechHolubec 3,* 1 Department of Horticulture, Agricultural Faculty, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey; [email protected] (H.I.S.); [email protected] (G.I.); [email protected] (S.E.) 2 Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, 60800 Multan, Pakistan; [email protected] 3 Department of Gene Bank, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, Prague 6—Ruzynˇe, 161 06 Prague, Czech Republic * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-233-022-497 Abstract: Oleaster-leafed pear (Pyrus elaeagrifolia Pall. subsp. elaeagrifolia) fruits are used for food and dietary supplements in Turkey, and seedlings are used as rootstock for pear cultivars. Information on the effect of genotypes on oleaster-leafed pear fruit characteristics is needed in order to optimize production of quality food and dietary supplements. The characteristics of oleaster-leafed pear fruits relative to genetic background were evaluated from 16 wild grown oleaster-leafed pear genotypes at eastern Turkey. Genotype influenced ripening dates, fruit weight, fruit length/width ratio, fruit pedicel length, fruit flesh texture, fruit firmness, the number of seeds per fruit, soluble solid content, titratable acidity, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity. Analysis of the data obtained from 16 oleaster-leafed pear genotypes demonstrated a highly significant influence of genotype on fruit characteristics. The genotypes G12, G13 and G9 had the highest fruit weight (19.22, 18.54 and 18.30 g) and G9 the highest total phenolic content (122 mg gallic acid Citation: Sagbas, H.I.; Ilhan, G.; equivalent/100 g fresh fruit).
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander of Alexandria and the Homoousion
    Vigiliae Christianae Vigiliae Christianae 66 (2012) 482-502 brill.com/vc Alexander of Alexandria and the Homoousion Mark Edwards Christ Church, Oxford, OX1 1DP, United Kingdom: [email protected] Abstract This paper responds to recent publications which play down the role of Bishop Alex- ander of Alexandria in securing the adoption of the term homoousion at the Nicene Council of 325. It argues that, while the term is not employed in any surviving work from his hand, there is some reason to believe that he sanctioned the use of it by his colleagues. There is no doubt that before the Council he had already declared the Son to be “from the Father’s essence”, and it is all but certain that when this phrase was challenged, together with the homoousion at Nicaea, it was he who produced a concil- iatory exegesis of both innovations, relying on the theology that had already been expounded in his letters Philostorgius’ story that he and Hosius of Cordoba had con- certed a plan to introduce the homoousion is not implausible, and it should not be assumed that the author of an anonymous life of Constantine, which corroborates this narrative, is merely paraphrasing Philostorgius. Their testimony is consistent with that of Ambrose of Milan, who can be shown to have been acquainted both with docu- ments and with witnesses of the proceedings at the Council. Keywords Nicaea, Alexander of Alexandria, homoousion, creed, Trinity, Eusebius of Nicomedia, Arius To whom do we owe the presence in the Nicene Creed of the adjective homoousios? There was a time when everyone would have held the opinion, lately endorsed again by Henry Chadwick, that “anti-Arian leaders” had already resolved to press it upon the Council of 325 before its opening.1 The parties to this compact were always assumed to have been Alexander 1) H.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download 2.4 Mb
    For Dad and Mom, Ronald Frances Sheridan (1937 –2017) Louise Anna McLellan Sheridan (1942 –2018) “I CURSE NO ONE WITHOUT CAUSE”: IDENTITY, POWER, RIVALRY, AND INVECTIVE IN THE EARLY 17TH-CENTURY OTTOMAN COURT The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by MICHAEL DOUGLAS SHERIDAN In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HISTORY THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA January 2018 ABSTRACT “I CURSE NO ONE WITHOUT CAUSE”: IDENTITY, POWER, RIVALRY, AND INVECTIVE IN THE EARLY 17TH-CENTURY OTTOMAN COURT Sheridan, Michael Douglas Ph.D., Department of History Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Kalpaklı January 2018 In the early 17th-century Ottoman Empire, a series of sociocultural, administrative, political, and economic changes were underway that left their mark on how the learned and cultural elite viewed the empire and themselves. Though contemporary sources reflect these shifts in many ways , this period’s rich corpus of invective verse , centering around the poet Nefʿī , has been understudied as a historical source. This dissertation rectifies this neglect by examining this invective corpus as a locus of rivalries and enmities revealing how those involved agonistically defined and were defined by their others, thus necessarily defining themselves in the process. Observing this process of definition and self-definition in the light of contemporary historical developments and sources, the dissertation examines invectives produced against both patrons ( i.e., vertical invective) and fellow poet/clients ( i.e., horizontal invective) in such a way as to demonstrate how the ferocity of the period’s invective verse, and reactions thereto, laid bare how Ottoman elites’ imaginary of themselves was in fact a marginalizing construct.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Pdf File of This Issue for Free
    Issue 85: The Council of Nicaea: Debating Jesus’ Divinity Debating Jesus' Divinity: Did You Know? Interresting and Unusual Facts about the Council of Nicaea Compiled by Steven Gertz, D. H. Williams, and John Anthony McGuckin All Aboard? The Council of Nicaea lives on in the imagination of the Church, both East and West. In this photograph taken in 1925, Russian Orthodox patriarchs prepare to board a train for St. David's, Wales, to celebrate Nicaea's 16th centenary. In Rome that same year, Pope Pius XI planned a party of his own in the Vatican basilica, declaring Nicaea a formative event for the Catholic understanding of the nature of Christ. Protestants too have honored Nicaea in their own way. Anglicans, among others, recite the Nicene Creed in church every Sunday, and many Protestants (perhaps unknowingly) celebrate Nicaea in their hymns. One of the most beloved is Reginald Heber's "Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty," which ends with a rousing "God in Three Persons, blessed Trinity." Written for Trinity Sunday, the hymn was set to music by John B. Dykes, who named the tune "Nicaea." Wipe Out Those Arian Barbarians Theodosius the Great may have dealt a death blow to Arians in the Roman Empire at the Council of Constantinople (381), but the heresy got a new lease on life among the barbarian Goths. Particularly influential was Theodoric the Great (d. 526), a ruthless military tactician (he murdered his rival) who adopted Arianism as his religion and built numerous Arian churches in Raverina, Italy. When the Byzantine Emperor Justinian recovered Ravenna in 535, he resolved to erase any Arian influence from the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Text
    Introduction At the end of the eleventh century AD (November of 1095), at the Council of Clermont, Pope Urban II issued a call for an armed pilgrimage to the Holy Land that became known as the First War of the Cross, or Crusade. This was at the request of the Byzantine emperor, Alexius Comnenus, in response to the increasing incursions of the Seljuq Turks into the formerly Byzantine territories in Asia Minor that had been gaining ground and momentum since the disastrous Byzantine defeat at the Battle of Manzikert in 1071. What the embattled Byzantine emperor expected from the West was an elite force of armored knights that would ostensibly be commanded by an imperial general. Instead, the Christian force exported through Byzantine lands into the East took on a form quite different from that requested by Alexius. Instead of a coherent, unified, and professional military force, what first appeared at the gates of Constantinople in early 1095 was a massive, untrained, and belligerent rabble of peasants lead by a preacher called Peter the Hermit. Having already come into armed conflict with Byzantine soldiers while en route to the Holy Land, this “Peoples’ Crusade” proved to be both unsuccessful in addressing the Turkish problem, and highly dangerous (as a relatively leaderless mob of armed peasants) to the Byzantine capital—these “crusaders” immediately took to pillaging and raiding the hinterland of Constantinople during their wait outside the city walls. Alexius hastily mobilized the Byzantine navy and had these first crusaders ferried across the Bosporus, whereupon the majority were slaughtered by the Turks in a quick series of engagements in western Asia Minor.
    [Show full text]