DOCSLIB.ORG

ISO/IEC International Standard 10646-1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ISO/IEC International Standard 10646-1 Proposed Draft Amendment (PDAM) 6.2 ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.6.2:2008(E) Information technology — Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) — AMENDMENT 6: Javanese, Lisu, Meetei Mayek, Samaritan, and other characters <0B95, 0BC1> TAMIL SYLLABLE KU Page 2, Clause 3 Normative references <0B95, 0BC2> TAMIL SYLLABLE KUU Update the reference to the Unicode Bidirectional Algo- <0B95, 0BC6> TAMIL SYLLABLE KE rithm and the Unicode Normalization Forms as follows: <0B95, 0BC7> TAMIL SYLLABLE KEE <0B95, 0BC8> TAMIL SYLLABLE KAI Unicode Standard Annex, UAX#9, The Unicode Bidi- <0B95, 0BCA> TAMIL SYLLABLE KO rectional Algorithm, Version 5.2.0, [Date TBD]. <0B95, 0BCB> TAMIL SYLLABLE KOO <0B95, 0BCC> TAMIL SYLLABLE KAU Unicode Standard Annex, UAX#15, Unicode Normali- zation Forms, Version 5.2.0, [Date TBD]. <0B99, 0BBE> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGAA <0B99, 0BBF> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGI Page 25, Clause 29 Named UCS Sequence <0B99, 0BC0> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGII Identifiers <0B99, 0BC1> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGU <0B99, 0BC2> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGUU Insert the additional 289 sequence identifiers <0B99, 0BC6> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGE <0B95, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT K <0B99, 0BC7> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGEE <0B99, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT NG <0B99, 0BC8> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGAI <0B9A, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT C <0B99, 0BCA> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGO <0B9E, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT NY <0B99, 0BCB> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGOO <0B9F, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT TT <0B99, 0BCC> TAMIL SYLLABLE NGAU <0BA3, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT NN <0BA4, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT T <0B9A, 0BBE> TAMIL SYLLABLE CAA <0BA8, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT N <0B9A, 0BBF> TAMIL SYLLABLE CI <0BAA, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT P <0B9A, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE CII <0BAE, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT M <0B9A, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE CU <0BAF, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT Y <0B9A, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE CUU <0BB0, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT R <0B9A, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE CE <0BB2, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT L <0B9A, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE CEE <0BB5, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT V <0B9A, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE CAI <0BB4, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT LLL <0B9A, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE CO <0BB3, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT LL <0B9A, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE COO <0BB1, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT RR <0B9A, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE CAU <0BA9, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT NNN <0B9C, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT J <0B9E, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYAA <0BB6, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT SH <0B9E, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYI <0BB7, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT SS <0B9E, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYII <0BB8, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT S <0B9E, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYU <0BB9, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT H <0B9E, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYUU <0B95, 0BCD, 0BB7, 0BCD> TAMIL CONSONANT KSS <0B9E, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYE <0B9E, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYEE <0B95, 0BBE> TAMIL SYLLABLE KAA <0B9E, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYAI <0B95, 0BBF> TAMIL SYLLABLE KI <0B9E, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYO <0B95, 0BC0> TAMIL SYLLABLE KII <0B9E, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYOO © ISO/IEC 2008 – All rights reserved 1 ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.6.2:2008 (E) Proposed Draft Amendment (PDAM) 6.2 <0B9E, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NYAU <0BAA, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PO <0BAA, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE POO <0B9F, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTAA <0BAA, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PAU <0B9F, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTI <0B9F, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTII <0BAE, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MAA <0B9F, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTU <0BAE, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MI <0B9F, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTUU <0BAE, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MII <0B9F, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTE <0BAE, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MU <0B9F, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTEE <0BAE, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MUU <0B9F, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTAI <0BAE, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE ME <0B9F, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTO <0BAE, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MEE <0B9F, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTOO <0BAE, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MAI <0B9F, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TTAU <0BAE, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MO <0BAE, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MOO <0BA3, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNAA <0BAE, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE MAU <0BA3, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNI <0BA3, 0BC0‎> ‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNII <0BAF, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YAA <0BA3, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNU <0BAF, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YI <0BA3, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNUU <0BAF, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YII <0BA3, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNE <0BAF, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YU <0BA3, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNEE <0BAF, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YUU <0BA3, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNAI <0BAF, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YE <0BA3, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNO <0BAF, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YEE <0BA3, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNOO <0BAF, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YAI <0BA3, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNAU <0BAF, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YO <0BAF, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YOO <0BA4, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TAA <0BAF, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE YAU <0BA4, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TI <0BA4, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TII <0BB0, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RAA <0BA4, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TU <0BB0, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RI <0BA4, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TUU <0BB0, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RII <0BA4, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TE <0BB0, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RU <0BA4, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TEE <0BB0, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RUU <0BA4, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TAI <0BB0, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RE <0BA4, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TO <0BB0, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE REE <0BA4, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TOO <0BB0, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RAI <0BA4, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE TAU <0BB0, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RO <0BB0, 0BCB‎> ‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE ROO <0BA8, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NAA <0BB0, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RAU <0BA8, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NI <0BA8, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NII <0BB2, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LAA <0BA8, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NU <0BB2, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LI <0BA8, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NUU <0BB2, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LII <0BA8, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NE <0BB2, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LU <0BA8, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NEE <0BB2, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LUU <0BA8, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NAI <0BB2, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LE <0BA8, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NO <0BB2, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LEE <0BA8, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NOO <0BB2, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LAI <0BA8, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NAU <0BB2, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LO <0BB2, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LOO <0BAA, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PAA <0BB2, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LAU <0BAA, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PI <0BAA, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PII <0BB5, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VAA <0BAA, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PU <0BB5, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VI <0BAA, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PUU <0BB5, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VII <0BAA, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PE <0BB5, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VU <0BAA, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PEE <0BB5, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VUU <0BAA, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE PAI <0BB5, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VE 2 © ISO/IEC 2008 – All rights reserved Proposed Draft Amendment (PDAM) 6.2 ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.6.2:2008(E) <0BB5, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VEE <0B9C, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE JU <0BB5, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VAI <0B9C, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE JUU <0BB5, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VO <0B9C, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE JE <0BB5, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VOO <0B9C, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE JEE <0BB5, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE VAU <0B9C, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE JAI <0B9C, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE JO <0BB4, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLAA <0B9C, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE JOO <0BB4, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLI <0B9C, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE JAU <0BB4, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLII <0BB4, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLU <0BB6, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHAA <0BB4, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLUU <0BB6, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHI <0BB4, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLE <0BB6, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHII <0BB4, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLEE <0BB6, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHU <0BB4, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLAI <0BB6, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHUU <0BB4, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLO <0BB6, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHE <0BB4, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLOO <0BB6, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHEE <0BB4, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLLAU <0BB6, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHAI <0BB6, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHO <0BB3, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLAA <0BB6, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHOO <0BB3, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLI <0BB6, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SHAU <0BB3, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLII <0BB3, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLU <0BB7, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSAA <0BB3, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLUU <0BB7, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSI <0BB3, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLE <0BB7, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSII <0BB3, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLEE <0BB7, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSU <0BB3, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLAI <0BB7, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSUU <0BB3, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLO <0BB7, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSE <0BB3, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLOO <0BB7, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSEE <0BB3, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE LLAU <0BB7, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSAI <0BB7, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSO <0BB1, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RRAA <0BB7, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSOO <0BB1, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RRI <0BB7, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SSAU <0BB1, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RRII <0BB1, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RRU <0BB8, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SAA <0BB1, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RRUU <0BB8, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SI <0BB1, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RRE <0BB8, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SII <0BB1, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RREE <0BB8, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SU <0BB1, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RRAI <0BB8, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SUU <0BB1, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RRO <0BB8, 0BC6‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SE <0BB1, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RROO <0BB8, 0BC7‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SEE <0BB1, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE RRAU <0BB8, 0BC8‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SAI <0BB8, 0BCA‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SO <0BA9, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNNAA <0BB8, 0BCB‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SOO <0BA9, 0BBF‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNNI <0BB8, 0BCC‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE SAU <0BA9, 0BC0‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNNII <0BA9, 0BC1‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNNU <0BB9, 0BBE‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE HAA <0BA9, 0BC2‎>‎ TAMIL SYLLABLE NNNUU <0BB9, 0BBF‎>‎
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Problems with Unicode for Languages Unsupported by Computers
    Problems with Unicode for Languages Unsupported by Computers Pat Hall, Language Technology Kendra, Patan, Nepal [email protected] Abstract If a language is to be used on the Internet it needs to be written and that writing encoded for the computer. The problems of achieving this for small languages is illustrated with respect to Nepal. Nepal has over 120 languages, with only the national language Nepali having any modern computer support. Nepali is relatively easy, since it is written in Devanagari which is also used for Hindi and other Indian languages, though with some local differences. I focus on the language of the Newar people, a language which has a mature written tradition spanning more than one thousand years, with several different styles of writing, and yet has no encoding of its writing within Unicode. Why has this happened? I explore this question, looking for answers in the view of technology of the people involved, in their different and possibly competing interests, and in the incentives for working on standards. I also explore what should be done about the many other unwritten and uncomputerised languages of Nepal. We are left with serious concerns about the standardisation process, but appreciate that encoding is critically important and we must work with the standardisation process as we find it.. Introduction If we are going to make knowledge written in our language available to everybody in their own languages, those languages must be written and that writing must be encoded in the computer. Those of us privileged to be native speakers of a world language such as English or Spanish may think this is straightforward, but it is not, as will be explained here.
    [Show full text]
  • A Glimpse of Kirat-Yakthung (Limbu) Language, Writing, and Literacy
    Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2017, pp. 560-593 Delinking, Relinking, and Linking Methodologies: A Glimpse of Kirat-Yakthung (Limbu) Language, Writing, and Literacy Marohang Limbu1 Writing, Rhetoric, and American Cultures Michigan State University, USA Abstract: Limbus (Limboos), who are also known as “Yakthungs” or “Kirat-Yakthung” or “Kirats,” have/had their own unique culture, language, writing, and Mundhum rhetorics. After “Nun-Paani Sandhi” (Salt-Water Treaty) in 1774 with Khas-Aryas, they (Khas- Aryans) ideologically and Politically banned Limbus from teaching of their language, writing, and Mundhum rhetorics in Yakthung laje (Limbuwan). Because of the Khas-Aryan oPPression, Limbu culture had/has become oral-dominant; Yakthungs used/use oral- Performance-based Mundhum rhetorics to Preserve their culture, language, histories, and Mundhum rhetorics. The main PurPose of this article is to discuss the develoPment of Kirat-Yakthung’s writing and rhetoric and/or rise-fall-rise of Yakthung scriPt, writing, and literacy. The essay demonstrates how Kirat-Yakthung indigenous PeoPles are delinking (denaturalizing or unlearning) Khas-Aryan-, Indian-, and Western linguistic and/or cultural colonization, how they are relinking (revisiting or relandscaPing) their Susuwa Lilim and/or Sawa Yet Hang ePistemologies, and how they are linking their cultural and linguistic identities from local to global level. In this essay, I briefly discuss delinking, relinking, and linking methodology, and how Kirat-Yakthungs are translating it into Practice. This essay demonstrates Khas-Aryan intervention and/or Khas-Aryan paracolonial intervention in the develoPment of Kirat-Yakthung writing and literacy, and Kirat-Yakthungs’ resistance for their existence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0--Online Edition
    This PDF file is an excerpt from The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0, issued by the Unicode Consor- tium and published by Addison-Wesley. The material has been modified slightly for this online edi- tion, however the PDF files have not been modified to reflect the corrections found on the Updates and Errata page (http://www.unicode.org/errata/). For information on more recent versions of the standard, see http://www.unicode.org/standard/versions/enumeratedversions.html. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and Addison-Wesley was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in initial capital letters. However, not all words in initial capital letters are trademark designations. The Unicode® Consortium is a registered trademark, and Unicode™ is a trademark of Unicode, Inc. The Unicode logo is a trademark of Unicode, Inc., and may be registered in some jurisdictions. The authors and publisher have taken care in preparation of this book, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the information or programs contained herein. The Unicode Character Database and other files are provided as-is by Unicode®, Inc. No claims are made as to fitness for any particular purpose. No warranties of any kind are expressed or implied. The recipient agrees to determine applicability of information provided. Dai Kan-Wa Jiten used as the source of reference Kanji codes was written by Tetsuji Morohashi and published by Taishukan Shoten.
    [Show full text]
  • (RSEP) Request October 16, 2017 Registry Operator INFIBEAM INCORPORATION LIMITED 9Th Floor
    Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) Request October 16, 2017 Registry Operator INFIBEAM INCORPORATION LIMITED 9th Floor, A-Wing Gopal Palace, NehruNagar Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380015 Request Details Case Number: 00874461 This service request should be used to submit a Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) request. An RSEP is required to add, modify or remove Registry Services for a TLD. More information about the process is available at https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rsep-2014- 02-19-en Complete the information requested below. All answers marked with a red asterisk are required. Click the Save button to save your work and click the Submit button to submit to ICANN. PROPOSED SERVICE 1. Name of Proposed Service Removal of IDN Languages for .OOO 2. Technical description of Proposed Service. If additional information needs to be considered, attach one PDF file Infibeam Incorporation Limited (“infibeam”) the Registry Operator for the .OOO TLD, intends to change its Registry Service Provider for the .OOO TLD to CentralNic Limited. Accordingly, Infibeam seeks to remove the following IDN languages from Exhibit A of the .OOO New gTLD Registry Agreement: - Armenian script - Avestan script - Azerbaijani language - Balinese script - Bamum script - Batak script - Belarusian language - Bengali script - Bopomofo script - Brahmi script - Buginese script - Buhid script - Bulgarian language - Canadian Aboriginal script - Carian script - Cham script - Cherokee script - Coptic script - Croatian language - Cuneiform script - Devanagari script
    [Show full text]
  • Limbu-English Dictionary
    Limbu-English Dictionary of the Mewa Khola dialect with English-Limbu index Boyd Michailovsky NOTE: this PDF contains the introduction to the published version of the dictionary. A complete, multimedia web version of the dictionary itself is available at the following address: http://lacito.vjf.cnrs.fr/pangloss/dictionaries/limbu/index.html Annotated recordings of the language on which the dictionary is based are available at: http://lacito.vjf.cnrs.fr/pangloss/corpus/list_rsc_en.php?lg=Limbu#langue (If these links don’t work in Firefox, try (e.g.) Chrome, or type the URL into the Firefox location bar.) Limbu-English Dictionary of the Mewa Khola dialect with English-Limbu index Boyd Michailovsky Introduction 3 © 2002 Boyd Michailovsky In Memory of Hallvard Kåre Kuløy Introduction The present dictionary is based on materials gathered in the field in 1977-1978 and slightly revised with informants in subsequent years. The original research was carried out in the village of Libang, in the Mewa Khola, where, on the recommendation of our friend Philippe Sagant, Martine Mazaudon and I worked during the monsoon of 1977. Later that same year, however, Libang was included in the restricted northern border area, and I moved to Tembe, in the neighboring Maiwa Khola valley. (I was able to return to Libang in 1999.) Although the Maiwa and Mewa valleys are traditionally considered as a single region by Limbus, the dialect of Tembe differs slightly from that of Libang, agreeing in some respects with the dialect of Phedap over the ridge to the south. The present work is based on both varieties, in particular on that of Libang, with occasional notes on dialect differences.
    [Show full text]
  • MSR-4: Annotated Repertoire Tables, Non-CJK
    Maximal Starting Repertoire - MSR-4 Annotated Repertoire Tables, Non-CJK Integration Panel Date: 2019-01-25 How to read this file: This file shows all non-CJK characters that are included in the MSR-4 with a yellow background. The set of these code points matches the repertoire specified in the XML format of the MSR. Where present, annotations on individual code points indicate some or all of the languages a code point is used for. This file lists only those Unicode blocks containing non-CJK code points included in the MSR. Code points listed in this document, which are PVALID in IDNA2008 but excluded from the MSR for various reasons are shown with pinkish annotations indicating the primary rationale for excluding the code points, together with other information about usage background, where present. Code points shown with a white background are not PVALID in IDNA2008. Repertoire corresponding to the CJK Unified Ideographs: Main (4E00-9FFF), Extension-A (3400-4DBF), Extension B (20000- 2A6DF), and Hangul Syllables (AC00-D7A3) are included in separate files. For links to these files see "Maximal Starting Repertoire - MSR-4: Overview and Rationale". How the repertoire was chosen: This file only provides a brief categorization of code points that are PVALID in IDNA2008 but excluded from the MSR. For a complete discussion of the principles and guidelines followed by the Integration Panel in creating the MSR, as well as links to the other files, please see “Maximal Starting Repertoire - MSR-4: Overview and Rationale”. Brief description of exclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 14: Tibeto-Bvrman Languages of the Himalayas
    PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series A-86 PAPERS IN SOUTHEAST ASIAN LINGUISTICS NO. 14: TIBETO-BVRMAN LANGUAGES OF THE HIMALAYAS edited by David Bradley Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Bradley, D. editor. Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 14:. A-86, vi + 232 (incl. 4 maps) pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1997. DOI:10.15144/PL-A86.cover ©1997 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. Pacific Linguistics specialises in publishing linguistic material relating to languages of East Asia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Linguistic and anthropological manuscripts related to other areas, and to general theoretical issues, are also considered on a case by case basis. Manuscripts are published in one of four series: SERIES A: Occasional Papers SERIES C: Books SERIES B: Monographs SERIES D: Special Publications FOUNDING EDITOR: S.A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: M.D. Ross and D.T. Tryon (Managing Editors), T.E. Dutton, N.P. Himmelmann, A.K. Pawley EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W. Bender KA. McElhanon University of Hawaii Summer Institute of Linguistics David Bradley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe University University of Hawaii Michael G. Clyne P. Miihlhausler Monash University Universityof Adelaide S.H. Elbert G.N. O'Grady University of Hawaii University of Victoria, B.C. K.J. Franklin KL. Pike Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W.Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W.Grace Gillian Sankoff University of Hawaii University of Pennsylvania M.A.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded License
    philological encounters 6 (2021) 43–69 brill.com/phen The Limbu Script and the Production of Religious Books in Nepal Martin Gaenszle | ORCID: 0000-0002-0782-1413 Institut für Südasien-, Tibet- und Buddhismuskunde, Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria [email protected] Abstract With the rise of ethnic politics in Nepal, the Limbu (or: Yakthumba) have made increas- ing use of the Limbu script, also known as Srijanga or Kiranti. Whereas in the past this script was suppressed by the state and known only to a minority, since the return of democracy to Nepal in the 1990s a new literature using this script has come into being. Here, religious books play a prominent role. This essay deals with the emerging impor- tance of the script as a marker of ethnicity since its first general propagation by Iman Singh Chemjong and Phalgunanda Lingden in the early twentieth century. It focuses on the early production of printed books, in particular books published by followers of the Satyahangma movement, which promotes reforms of Kiranti religion and society. Keywords oral tradition – writing systems – invention of scripts – print history – religious reform – Nepal … But the specific pre-eminence of the written word over images is stoutly maintained. As one Tibetan scholar stated it, “One letter formed is of greater value than a likeness of Buddha formed, for the letter aids knowledge.” This statement, and the attitudes and behav- ior pattern of which it is the expression, suggests that, among the Tibetans, grapholatry is more real than idolatry. Robert Ekvall, Religious Observances in Tibet (1964), 114. © Martin Gaenszle, 2021 | doi:10.1163/24519197-bja10014 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded license.
    [Show full text]
  • Unicode Reference Lists: Other Script Sources
    Other Script Sources File last updated October 2020 General ALA-LC Romanization Tables: Transliteration Schemes for Non-Roman Scripts, Approved by the Library of Congress and the American Library Association. Tables compiled and edited by Randall K. Barry. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1997. ISBN 0-8444-0940-5. Adlam Barry, Ibrahima Ishagha. 2006. Hè’lma wallifandè fin èkkitago’l bèbèrè Pular: Guide pra- tique pour apprendre l’alphabet Pulaar. Conakry, 2006. Ahom Barua, Bimala Kanta, and N.N. Deodhari Phukan. Ahom Lexicons, Based on Original Tai Manuscripts. Guwahati: Department of Historical and Antiquarian Studies, 1964. Hazarika, Nagen, ed. Lik Tai K hwam Tai (Tai letters and Tai words). Souvenir of the 8th Annual conference of Ban Ok Pup Lik Mioung Tai. Eastern Tai Literary Association, 1990. Kar, Babul. Tai Ahom Alphabet Book. Sepon, Assam: Tai Literature Associate, 2005. Alchemical Symbols Berthelot, Marcelin. Collection des anciens alchimistes grecs. 3 vols. Paris: G. Steinheil, 1888. Berthelot, Marcelin. La chimie au moyen âge. 3 vols. Osnabrück: O. Zeller, 1967. Lüdy-Tenger, Fritz. Alchemistische und chemische Zeichen. Würzburg: JAL-reprint, 1973. Schneider, Wolfgang. Lexikon alchemistisch-pharmazeutischer Symbole. Weinheim/Berg- str.: Verlag Chemie, 1962. Anatolian Hieroglyphs Hawkins, John David, and Halet Çambel. Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. Ber- lin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2000. ISBN 3-11-010864-X. Herbordt, Suzanne. Die Prinzen- und Beamtensiegel der hethitischen Grossreichszeit auf Tonbullen aus dem Ni!antepe-Archiv in Hattusa. Mit Kommentaren zu den Siegelin- schriften und Hieroglyphen von J. David Hawkins. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp von Zabern, 2005. ISBN: 3-8053-3311-0.
    [Show full text]
  • A Desciptive Grammar of Chhatthare Limbu
    A DESCIPTIVE GRAMMAR OF CHHATTHARE LIMBU A Dissertation Report Submitted to Social Inclusion Research Fund/SNV Nepal Sanepa, Lalitpur By Govinda Bahadur Tumbahang Central Department of English Kirtipur, Kathmandu 2007 iv AKNOWLEDGEMENTS My gratitude goes first and foremost to my father late Purun Dhoj Tumbahang, who roused an unflinching interest in my mind to contribute something to Chhatthare Limbu at my early stage of life. This interest inspired me to write M. A. thesis on Noun Phrase Structures in Limbu in Chhatthare Limbu under the supervision of Prof. Dr.Y.P. Yadava, who was then reader at the Tribhuvan University. More than a decade and a half after my completion of M.A., I was again inspired to pursue Ph. D. course on ‘A Descriptive Grammar of Chhathare Limbu’ My deepest debt of gratitude is to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Madhav Prasad Pokharel, who made me successful to complete the dissertation giving me the whole vision of language I needed and sensible and sane framework around which my thoughts have been organized. I owe everything to him for his guidance, supervision, challenging criticism, verbally at our meetings which used to stretch for hours and by e-mail while I was outside of the valley. Similarly, I owe much to Prof. Dr. David E. Watters for his untiring effort to make comments on my writing and suggestion for the improvement of the dissertation. My thanks are due to Prof. Dr. Novel Kishore Rai for his continuous inspiration and encouragement while I felt disappointed with my heavy work. In my fieldwork, Tek Chandra Wanem of Dhungge Sanghu, Sita Mademma of Phedap, Dilendra Subba of Panthar and Bharat Subba, Bhairab Angla, Kuber Singh Limbu, Manindra Kumar Sangwa, Bisnu Kumar Limbu and Rina Subba of Chhathar area were my informants.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of Tibetology
    Bulletin of Tibetology VOLUME 44 NO. 1 AND 2 2008 NAMGYAL INSTITUTE OF TIBETOLOGY GANGTOK, SIKKIM The Bulletin of Tibetology seeks to serve the specialist as well as the general reader with an interest in the field of study. The motif portraying the Stupa on the mountains suggests the dimensions of the field. Bulletin of Tibetology VOLUME 44 NO. 1 AND 2 2008 NAMGYAL INSTITUTE OF TIBETOLOGY GANGTOK, SIKKIM Patron HIS EXCELLENCY SHRI BALMIKI PRASAD SINGH, THE GOVERNOR OF SIKKIM Advisor TASHI DENSAPA, DIRECTOR NIT Editorial Board FRANZ-KARL EHRHARD ACHARYA SAMTEN GYATSO SAUL MULLARD BRIGITTE STEINMANN TASHI TSERING MARK TURIN ROBERTO VITALI Editor ANNA BALIKCI-DENJONGPA Assistant Editors TSULTSEM GYATSO ACHARYA THUPTEN TENZING The Bulletin of Tibetology is published bi-annually by the Director, Namgyal Institute of Tibetology, Gangtok, Sikkim. Annual subscription rates: South Asia, Rs150. Overseas, $20. Correspondence concerning bulletin subscriptions, changes of address, missing issues etc., to: Administrative Assistant, Namgyal Institute of Tibetology, Gangtok 737102, Sikkim, India ([email protected]). Editorial correspondence should be sent to the Editor at the same address. Submission guidelines. We welcome submission of articles on any subject of the history, language, art, culture and religion of the people of the Tibetan cultural area although we would particularly welcome articles focusing on Sikkim, Bhutan and the Eastern Himalayas. Articles should be in English or Tibetan, submitted by email or on CD along with a hard copy and should not exceed 5000 words in length. The views expressed in the Bulletin of Tibetology are those of the contributors alone and not the Namgyal Institute of Tibetology.
    [Show full text]
  • Iso/Iec Jtc1/Sc2/Wg2 N2386
    ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 N2386 2001-10-11 Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set International Organization for Standardization Organisation internationale de normalisation еждународная организация по стандартизации Doc Type: Working Group Document Title: Expectations for the 41st meeting of WG2 Source: Ireland Status: National Body Contribution Date: 2001-10-11 Distribution: WG2 Ireland regrets that we are unable to send a representative to the Singapore meeting. In particular we regret not being able to meet our colleagues from Cambodia and from China to work on matters of mutual interest. We note that a great many items are mature and ready for encoding, and we hope to see two Pre-Draft Amendments sent out from the Singapore meetings. We anticipate that PDAM 2 to ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000 will contain the following. Phonetic characters from N2366R Limbu script from N2339 Tai Le script from N2372 (see note below) Yijing monogram, digram, and hexagram symbols from N2363 15 Variation selectors from N2370 Minor editorial revisions to synchronize UTF-8 descriptions between Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646 mentioned in N2370 Ireland supports the inclusion of Tai Le script in Amd. 2 as long as the draft of the Amendment is based on N2372. Any further changes can be made during the ballot procedure. We anticipate that PDAM 1 to ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001 will contain the following. Linear B Syllabary from N2378 Linear B Ideograms from N2378 Aegean Numbers from N2378 Ugaritic Cuneiform script from N2338 Shavian script from N2362R Osmanya script from N2361R Cypriot Syllabary from N2378 240 Variation selectors We look forward to the Dublin meeting at which we can continue the work on ISO/IEC 10646 by dealing with the ballot comments on these two PDAMs.
    [Show full text]