Growth Rates of Larval and Juvenile Bigeye Scad Selar

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Growth Rates of Larval and Juvenile Bigeye Scad Selar Welch et al. SpringerPlus 2013, 2:634 http://www.springerplus.com/content/2/1/634 a SpringerOpen Journal RESEARCH Open Access Growth rates of larval and juvenile bigeye scad Selar crumenophthalmus in captivity Aaron Welch*, Ronald Hoenig, John Stieglitz, Zach Daugherty, Bruno Sardenberg, Sasa Miralao, Dan Farkas and Dan Benetti Abstract Growth rates of larval and juvenile bigeye scad Selar crumenophthalmus reared in captivity were studied. The results are presented, discussed, and compared to wild S. crumenophthalmus and other pelagic fish. S. crumenophthalmus are a small pelagic carangid fish of circumtropical distribution. Larvae were reared in a modified mesocosm system and sampled daily for growth. Larvae grew to a mean size of 4.74 cm (Standard Length) and 1.30 g by 45 days post hatch (dph). Larval length-at-age was best described by the exponential equation Y = 1.966e0.0704t. For juvenile growth trials, 1940 fish were stocked into four 2.5 m3 cylindro-conical tanks at two different densities (262 fish m-3 and 120 fish m-3) and reared from 45 dph to subadult stage. Fish were sampled daily for growth. No statistically significant differences in growth or survival were detected between tanks. Mean length and weight at 141 dph was 13.24 cm (Total Length) and 25.20 g. Juvenile length-at-age was best described by the Von Bertalanffy Growth -0.03(t-1.57) Model equation Lt = 27.75(1 – e ). Weight-at-age was best described by a linear equation Wt =1.7313x + 12.4662. The exponent of the length-weight equation was 3.14. In addition to providing the first published description of larviculture and juvenile growout techniques for S. crumenophthalmus, this study contains the first published data on this species’ larval growth and directly confirms estimates of S. crumenophthalmus juvenile growth done by other researchers using indirect techniques such as otolith daily growth increment and frequency distribution analysis. Keywords: Larviculture; Length-at-age; Mean daily growth increment; Von Bertalanffy Growth Model; Weight-at-age Introduction harvest (Dalzell and Penaflor 1989; Hendiarti et al. 2005). Bigeye scad Selar crumenophthalmus (Bloch) are a small Around Reunion Island in the Indian Ocean, fishers pelagic, schooling fish of circum-tropical distribution take more than 35 metric tons of S. crumenophthalmus (e.g. Dalzell and Penaflor 1989; Clarke and Privitera (known locally as atule) a year using hand lines and 1995; Mohammed and Rennie 2003; Hendiarti et al. 2005; beach seines (Roos et al. 2007). In Florida and the Roos et al. 2007). Members of the Carangidae family, Caribbeanthereisverylittlereliabledataonthemagnitude S. crumenophthalmus are an important forage fish for high of S. crumenophthalmus (known locally as goggle eye) trophic level predators, are highly valued as food in Asian harvests but anecdotal evidence indicates that landings and Pacific cultures, and are used as bait by recreational are significant, especially for use as live bait. In the and commercial fishermen all over the world (Clarke and Caribbean, live S. crumenophthalmus are the favored Privitera 1995; Honebrink 2000; Roos et al. 2007). bait of the pelagic long line fishing fleet. Individual S. crumenophthalmus support a number of important longlinevesselstakeasmanyas12,000fishtoseaper fisheries throughout the world. In Hawaii more than trip in large (~8500 l) live wells where they are used to 500 metric tons of S. crumenophthalmus (known locally target tunas (Thunnus spp.) and other high value fish as akule and hahalalu) are harvested each year for local (Capt. Don Landry, personal communication, 20 April consumption (Stevens 2004). In parts of the Indonesian 2010). In Florida, S. crumenophthalmus were formerly and the Philippine archipelagos S. crumenophthalmus harvested as a food fish, largely for sale in the Asian catches account for 3 to 15% of the annual small pelagic fish market. The fishery, however, was based on unsustain- able purse-seining practices and by the mid-1990s * Correspondence: [email protected] stocks had declined over large portions of the species’ University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA © 2013 Welch et al.; licensee Springer. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Welch et al. SpringerPlus 2013, 2:634 Page 2 of 9 http://www.springerplus.com/content/2/1/634 range. As the stocks declined, the food-fish fishery was The eggs used in this study came from two spawning largely forgotten and the S. crumenophthalmus became events that were induced using hormone injections. The increasingly valuable as live bait for recreational fishermen. first group of fish (n = 20) was injected with Luteinizing Today S. crumenophthalmus in Florida retail for $ 100 for Hormone-Releasing Hormone analogue (LHRH-a) at a dozen live fish or more (Capt. Butch Constable, personal adosageof25to50μgkg-1.Thesecondgroupoffish communication, 15 October 2008). (n = 20) was injected with Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Wild S. crumenophthalmus exhibit rapid growth rates, (HCG) at a rate of 1000 IU kg-1. Both groups were seg- reaching a fork length (Lf ) of approximately 20 to 25 cm regated in separate maturation tanks. The fish were not in one year (Dalzell and Penaflor 1989; Roos et al. 2007) sexed prior to injection. The fish injected with LHRH-a and have been observed with a Lf of more 28 cm (Ralston produced an estimated 54,400 eggs with a fertilization and Williams 1988). They are partial spawners, and have rate of 82.4% and an average diameter of 735 μm. The been estimated to release 92,000 eggs per spawn (Clarke HCG injected fish produced an estimated 62,440 eggs and Privitera 1995). In the wild, spawning occurs over an with a fertilization rate of 96.7% and an average diameter extended period during warm months (Kawamoto 1973; of 744 μm. Eggs were pooled in a single incubator and the Tobias 1987; Clarke and Privitera 1995; Roos et al. 2007). hatch rate was approximately 80%. S. crumenophthalmus arenotgenerallybelievedtosur- vive more than one spawning season, although a small Larval rearing number of animals are reported to live as long as three Approximately 71,000 yolk-sac larvae at 1 dph were years (Kawamoto 1973; Ralston and Williams 1988). stocked into a 1.8 m3 flat-bottomed larval-rearing tank Feeding is largely nocturnal and planktonic animals supplied with 1 μm filtered seawater for this study. The such as euphasiids and fish larvae are favored prey early stage larval rearing protocols used in this study items (Roux and Conand 2000). relied on a modified greenwater system adapted from other In this paper the growth rates of larval and juvenile authors (Liao et al. 2001; Papandroulakis et al. 2002; S. crumenophthalmus reared in captivity are compared Partridge et al. 2003; Palmer et al. 2007). A mixture of 50% with the growth rates of wild S. crumenophthalmus and Isochrysis galbana and 50% Nannochloropsis oculata was other wild and hatchery-reared small pelagic fish, especially maintained in the larviculture tank at a density of ~400,000 carangids. We also compare length-weight data for both cells ml-1. Due to a shortage of live algae, small amounts wild and captive juvenile S. crumenophthalmus and describe of commercially prepared non-viable I. galbana and larviculture and juvenile growout techniques for the species. N. oculata concentrates (NutrOcean, Inc., Rimouski, Quebec) were added on an as-needed basis to maintain Materials and methods the desired concentration of microalgae in the larval rearing Broodstock capture, maturation and spawning tanks. The percentage of concentrate substitution never All the fish used in this study were reared in captivity rose above 50%. Enriched s-type rotifers (Brachionus from eggs obtained from wild broodstock. All brood- rotundiformus) were maintained in the tank at a dens- stock fish used for this study were captured in wa- ity of 20–30 rotifers ml-1 via daily additions. ters approximately five nautical miles east-southeast Beginning at 17 dph the culture was transitioned from a of Key Biscayne, Florida, in the vicinity of Fowey Rocks modified greenwater system to an intensive system adapted (National Data Buoy Center Station FWYF1), latitude from Benetti et al. (2008). Water exchange was increased 25.590 N 80.097 W and held at the University of Miami (ultimately reaching 1000% per day), enriched instar-2 Experimental Hatchery (UMEH). Artemia were provided using a pulse feeding method, Broodstock fish were held in four 4.5 m3 cylindro-conical and algal and rotifer densities were allowed to drop to tanks connected to a single recirculating filtration system zero. Commercially prepared weaning feeds were pro- utilizing UV, mechanical (broken glass) and biological vided along with the live feeds beginning at 22 dph. By filtration. Each tank had its own egg collector. Brood- 35 dph the fish were fully weaned onto commercially stock fish were conditioned to spawn in their tanks by prepared feeds. maintaining water temperature at 28 - 30°C, a level that A 24-hour light photoperiod was used to rear the lar- corresponds to the upper end of the ambient temperature vae through 6 dph using aquarium lighting. At 7 dph the range experienced in south Florida coastal waters dur- photoperiod was changed to 18 hours light and 6 hours ing the S. crumenophthalmus spawning season (NODC dark. Beginning at 16 dph the light period was reduced National Ocean Data Center 2010). Natural light was by one to one and a half hours hour per day until the provided through a 95% reflective cloth. Water exchange photoperiod was entirely natural (~11 hours light and was approximately 20% per day. Ammonia (NH4)waskept 13 hours dark) at 20 dph.
Recommended publications
  • A Revision of Selected Genera of the Family Carangidae (Pisces) from Australian Waters
    Records of the Australian Museum (1990) Supplement 12. ISBN 0 7305 7445 8 A Revision of Selected Genera of the Family Carangidae (Pisces) from Australian Waters JOHN S. GUNN Division of Fisheries, CSIRO Marine Laboratories, P.O. Box 1538, Hobart, 7001 Tas., Australia ABSTRACT. An annotated list of the 63 species in 23 genera of carangid fishes known from Australian waters is presented. Included in these 63 are eight endemic species, eight new Australian records (Alepes vari, Carangoides equula, C. plagiotaenia, C. talamparoides, Caranx lugubris, Decapterus kurroides, D. tabl and Seriola rivoliana) and a new species in the genus Alepes. A generic key and specific keys to Alectis, Alepes, Carangoides, Scomberoides, Selar, Ulua and Uraspis are given. The systematics of the 32 Australian species of Alectis, Alepes, Atule, Carangoides, "Caranx", Elagatis, Gnathanodon,Megalaspis,Pantolabus, Scomberoides, Selar, Selaroides, Seriolina, Ulua and Uraspis are covered in detail. For each species a recommended common name, other common names, Australian secondary synonymy, diagnosis, colour notes, description, comparison with other species, maximum recorded size, ecological notes and distribution are given. Specific primary synonymies are listed when the type locality is Australia or Papua New Guinea. Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Materials and Methods .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Bigeye Scad, Selar Crumenophthalmus (Bloch, 1793) (Family Carangidae), New to the California Marine Fauna, with a List to and Keys for All California Carangids
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Occidental College Scholar Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences Volume 114 | Issue 3 Article 4 2016 The iB geye Scad, Selar crumenophthalmus (Bloch, 1793) (Family Carangidae), New to the California Marine Fauna, with a List to and Keys for All California Carangids Milton S. Love Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, [email protected] Julianne Kalman Passarelli Cabrillo Beach Marine Aquarium, 3720 Stephen M White Dr, San Pedro, CA 90731 Chris Okamoto Cabrillo Beach Marine Aquarium, 3720 Stephen M White Dr, San Pedro, CA 90731 Dario W. Diehl Southern California Water Research Project, 3535 Harbor Blvd., Suite 110, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.oxy.edu/scas Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Love, Milton S.; Passarelli, Julianne Kalman; Okamoto, Chris; and Diehl, Dario W. (2015) "The iB geye Scad, Selar crumenophthalmus (Bloch, 1793) (Family Carangidae), New to the California Marine Fauna, with a List to and Keys for All California Carangids," Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences: Vol. 114: Iss. 3. Available at: https://scholar.oxy.edu/scas/vol114/iss3/4 This Research Note is brought to you for free and open access by OxyScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences by an authorized editor of OxyScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Love et al.: Bigeye Scad, New to California Bull.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]
  • SYNONYMS STILL in USE: None FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION
    click for previous page CARAN Gnath 1 1974 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FAMILY: CARANGIDAE FISHING AREAS 57,71 (E Ind. Ocean) (W Cent. Pacific) Gnathanodon speciosus (Forsskål, 1775) SYNONYMS STILL IN USE: None VERNACULAR NAMES: FAO: En - Golden toothless trevally Fr - Sp - NATIONAL: DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS: A deep-bodied, compressed carangid. Head profile steep, with slight indentation in front of eye. Eye small, its diameter 4.5 to 5.6 times in head length. Upper jaw reaching to below front margin of eye, or front margin of pupil in young. No teeth in jaws in fish longer than 8 cm; lips papillose; no teeth on vomer and palatines (roof of mouth); tongue rough, with fine denticles. Gill rakers 20 on lower limb of 1st arch. 1st dorsal fin with a forward-pointing spine (not visible in adults) and 7 to 8 spines; 2nd dorsal fin with 1 spine and 18 to 21 soft rays. Anal and dorsal fin bases approximately equal. Pectoral fins falcate, longer than head length. Anal fin with 2 detached spines, followed by 1 spine and 16 soft rays. Breast scaled. Lateral line moderately curved, becoming straight under 8th soft dorsal fin ray; curved part slightly longer than straight part; 17 to 25 feeble scutes. Colour: fish of 30 cm. i n length are yellow with dark vertical bars; larger fish are paler with black patches and faint cross-b a r s on sides. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERS OF SIMILAR SPECIES OCCURRING IN THE AREA: Selaroides leptolepis: minute teeth in lower jaw and no dark vertical bars on body but a distinctive yellow band; also, gill rakers 26 (20 in Gnathanodon).
    [Show full text]
  • A Remarkable New Genus of Carangidae from the Upper
    © Zoological Institute, St.Petersburg, 2002 A remarkable new genus of Carangidae fron1 the Upper Paleocene of Turkmenistan (Osteichthyes: Perciformes) A.M. Prokofiev Prokofiev,A.M. 2002. A remarkable new genus ofCarangidae fromthe Upper Paleocene of Turkmenistan (Osteichthyes: Perciformes).Zoosystematica Rossica, 11(1): 219-228. A new genus and species of Carangidae, Uylyaichthys eugeniae gen. et sp. n., is de­ scribed from the Upper Paleocene (middle part of the Danata Formation) of Turkmenistan. It belongs to the subfamily Trachinotinae s. str. and differs from all known members of the family in the combination of low vertebral count (21 or possibly 22), parasphenoid strongly curved mesially, and unique predorsal formula0/0+0+0/l/. Uylyaichthys is con­ sidered to be a sister taxon for Trachinotus + Paratrachinotus, and Trachinotinae s. str. regarded as a sister group of Scomberoidinae. The genus Lichia is excluded from Trachinotinae s. str. and considered to be a sister taxon ofScomberoidinae + Trachinotinae s. str. A.M. Prokofiev, Department of Fishes and Fish-like Vertebrates, Palaeontological Insti­ tute, Russian Academy ofSciences, Profwyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow 117997, Russia. Introduction Material and methods Daniltshenko ( 1968) described the Upper Paleo­ Specimens described herein were collected by cene ichthyofauna of Uylya-Kushlyuk locality Dr. E.K. Sytchevskaya from the middle part of (Turkmenistan) and established 20 species. Danata Formation in Uylya-Kushlyuk locality. Among them, Daniltshenko described two forms, Uylya-Kushlyuk locality is situated 2 km NE of which he placed into the family Carangidae (Ar­ Uylya-Kushlyuk village, SW Turkmenistan, on chaeus oblongus and Trachicaranxtersus). Later, the western slope of the Kopetdagh Mountains Trachicaranx was transferredto the familyApo­ (38°38'N, 55°48'E).
    [Show full text]
  • Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) Associated with Venezuelan Marine Fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii)
    Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) associated with Venezuelan marine fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii) Lucy Bunkley-Williams,1 Ernest H. Williams, Jr.2 & Abul K.M. Bashirullah3 1 Caribbean Aquatic Animal Health Project, Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 9012, Mayagüez, PR 00861, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 908, Lajas, Puerto Rico 00667, USA; ewil- [email protected] 3 Instituto Oceanografico de Venezuela, Universidad de Oriente, Cumaná, Venezuela. Author for Correspondence: LBW, address as above. Telephone: 1 (787) 832-4040 x 3900 or 265-3837 (Administrative Office), x 3936, 3937 (Research Labs), x 3929 (Office); Fax: 1-787-834-3673; [email protected] Received 01-VI-2006. Corrected 02-X-2006. Accepted 13-X-2006. Abstract: The parasitic isopod fauna of fishes in the southern Caribbean is poorly known. In examinations of 12 639 specimens of 187 species of Venezuelan fishes, the authors found 10 species in three families of isopods (Gnathiids, Gnathia spp. from Diplectrum radiale*, Heteropriacanthus cruentatus*, Orthopristis ruber* and Trachinotus carolinus*; two aegids, Rocinela signata from Dasyatis guttata*, H. cruentatus*, Haemulon auro- lineatum*, H. steindachneri* and O. ruber; and Rocinela sp. from Epinephelus flavolimbatus*; five cymothoids: Anilocra haemuli from Haemulon boschmae*, H. flavolineatum* and H. steindachneri*; Anilocra cf haemuli from Heteropriacanthus cruentatus*; Haemulon bonariense*, O. ruber*, Cymothoa excisa in H. cruentatus*; Cymothoa oestrum in Chloroscombrus chrysurus, H. cruentatus* and Priacanthus arenatus; Cymothoa sp. in O. ruber; Livoneca sp. from H. cruentatus*; and Nerocila fluviatilis from H. cruentatus* and P. arenatus*). The Rocinela sp. and A.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 3.0 Description, Distribution, and Use of Essential Fish
    3.0 Description, Distribution and Use of Essential Fish Habitat 3.0 DESCRIPTION, DISTRIBUTION, AND USE OF ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT 3.1 Estuarine and Inshore Habitats 3.1.1 Estuarine 3.1.1.1 Estuarine Emergent (Saltmarsh and Brackish Marsh) 3.1.1.1.1 Description and Ecological Role and Function The saltmarsh is a type of wetland. Wetlands are classified on the basis of their hydrology, vegetation and substrate. One classification system proposed by Cowardin et al., (1979) and used by the USFWS classifies wetlands into five ecological systems. Estuarine emergents fall into two of these systems, the Estuarine and Marine. The Estuarine wetland is described as tidal wetlands in low-wave-energy environments, where the salinity is greater than 0.5 parts per thousand (ppt) and is variable owing to evaporation and the mixing of seawater and freshwater. Marine wetlands are described as tidal wetlands that are exposed to waves and currents of the open ocean and have a salinity of greater than 30 ppt. A saltmarsh, as defined by Beeflink (1977), is a “natural or semi-natural salt tolerant grassland and dwarf brushwood on the alluvial sediments bordering saline water bodies whose water level fluctuates either tidal or nontidally”. The flora comprise of erect, rooted, herbaceous hydrophytes dominated by salt- tolerant perennial plants (Cowardin et al. 1979). Structure and function of a saltmarsh are influenced by tide, salinity, nutrients and temperature. The saltmarsh can be a stressful environment to plants and animals, with rapid changes occurring in these abiotic variables (Gosselink 1980; Gosselink et al. 1974). Although species diversity may be lower than in other systems, the saltmarsh is one of the most biologically productive ecosystems in the world (Teal 1962; Teal and Teal, 1969).
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Pelagic Food Webs Leading to Top Predators in the Pacific Ocean
    Progress in Oceanography 86 (2010) 152–165 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Progress in Oceanography journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pocean Analyzing pelagic food webs leading to top predators in the Pacific Ocean: A graph-theoretic approach Jeffrey M. Dambacher a,*, Jock W. Young b, Robert J. Olson c, Valérie Allain d, Felipe Galván-Magaña e, Matthew J. Lansdell b, Noemí Bocanegra-Castillo e, Vanessa Alatorre-Ramírez e, Scott P. Cooper b, Leanne M. Duffy c a CSIRO Mathematics, Informatics and Statistics, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia b CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia c Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA d Secretariat of the Pacific Community, BP D5, 98848 Noumea, New Caledonia e Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Apartado Postal 592, La Paz, Baja California Sur, C.P. 23000, Mexico article info abstract Article history: This work examined diet data from studies of top pelagic predators from three large regions of the equa- Received 14 March 2008 torial and South Pacific Ocean. Food webs of each of these three systems were found to have relatively Received in revised form 16 June 2009 high species diversity, but in contrast to other marine systems, relatively low connectance. Food webs Accepted 10 April 2010 were examined using graph-theoretic methods, which included aggregating species based on food-web Available online 20 April 2010 relationships and identification of potentially influential species. Species aggregations were used to con- struct simplified qualitative models from each region’s food web.
    [Show full text]
  • Perciformes Suborder Percoidei – Carangidae Twenty–Five Species in 13 Genera of the Family Carangidae Occur in the Present Study Area, Either As Adults Or As Larvae
    1038 Perciformes Suborder Percoidei – Carangidae Twenty–five species in 13 genera of the family Carangidae occur in the present study area, either as adults or as larvae. The family is distributed worldwide, mostly in tropical and warm temperate waters, and larvae are both more speciose, and more abundant, in waters south of Cape Hatteras. Larvae are reasonably well-described, but the eggs of most species are undescribed. Carangid classification used here follows Smith-Vaniz (1984) and Larocheet al. (1984). A detailed summary of carangid larval characters prepared by Laroche et al. (2006) provided much of the information presented below. That report, and the report by Watson et al. (1996) should be consulted for more critical detail regarding carangid larvae from the tropical western Atlantic and the Eastern Pacific oceans, respectively. Meristic characters: See table of meristic characters in the Introduction to the suborder Percoidei, and the ranges of selected characters in the family Carangidae in the Perciformes Introduction. Meristic characters are fairly conservative in the family, but combinations of all counts are helpful in identifying species. For example, see figures demonstrating distributions of fin rays for species in the genusCaranx (after Berry, 1959a) on "Caranx" Introduction page. Head spines: The characters of 3 head spines are important in carangid larvae: the Supraoccipital Crest (present or ab- sent); the spine at the angle of Preopercle (simple, serrate or secondarily ornamented); and the Supraocular Ridge (composed of a small spine, a serrate ridge, or prominent spines). Other head spines that occur in only a few taxa include the Posttemporal, Supracleithral, Pterotic, and smaller spines along the ascending and anterior limbs of the Preopercle.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Fish Parasitic Isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda) from the Gulf of Thailand
    animals Article New Records of Fish Parasitic Isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda) from the Gulf of Thailand Watchariya Purivirojkul * and Apiruedee Songsuk Animal Systematics and Ecology Speciality Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 November 2020; Accepted: 2 December 2020; Published: 4 December 2020 Simple Summary: Parasitic isopods were reported found from marine fishes from many habitat in the world. In Thailand, there is not much study on this parasitic group. This work has compiled all published parasitic isopods documents in Thailand from year 1950 to present include collecting samples from the Gulf of Thailand during the period 2006–2019. New host records were found from four species of parasitic isopods (Cymothoa eremita, Smenispa irregularis, Nerocila sundaica, Norileca triangulata) and two species of parasitic isopods (Argathona macronema, Norileca triangulata) were found first time in the central Indo-Pacific region. Abstract: From a total of 4140 marine fishes examined, eight species of parasitic isopods were reported from marine fishes in the Gulf of Thailand. These isopods were identified in two families, Corallanidae (Argathona macronema and Argathona rhinoceros) and Cymothoidae (Cymothoa eremita, Cymothoa elegans, Smenispa irregularis, Nerocila sundaica, Norileca indica and Norileca triangulata). Most of these parasitic isopods were found in the buccal cavity of their fish hosts with one host recorded as follows: C. eremita was found from Nemipterus hexodon, C. elegans was found from Scatophagus argus, N. sundaica was found from Saurida tumbil. The majority of the isopod specimens recorded in this study was S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Shellfish Diversity and Its Sustainable Management in Chilika Lake
    FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka 2018 ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute Barrackpore, Kolkata - 700 120 (India) & Chilika Development Authority C- 11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751 014 (India) FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta, M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das, A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka Photo editing: Sujit Choudhury and Manavendra Roy ISBN: 978-81-938914-0-7 Citation: Suresh, et al. 2018. Fish and shellfish diversity and its sustainable management in Chilika lake, ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, Bhubaneswar. 376p. Copyright: © 2018. ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (CIFRI), Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holders. Photo credits: Sujit Choudhury, Manavendra Roy, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, V. R. Suresh, S. K. Karna, M. Mukherjee and Abdul Rasid Published by: Chief Executive Chilika Development Authority C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751 014 (Odisha) Cover design by: S. K. Mohanty Designed and printed by: S J Technotrade Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Roffer Hall Species – Vulnerabilities10 16 2015Mar
    Draft - October 16, 2015 Fish Species Environmental Vulnerabilities Consolidation By Mitchell A. Roffer and Candice Hall. Roffer’s Ocean Fishing Forecasting Service, Inc. (ROFFS™), West Melbourne, FL https://www.roffs.com - [email protected] Introduction: This is a literature review to consolidate the documents related to the apparent vulnerabilities to environmental change for the important commercial and recreational fishes in the South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean regions. It is provided as background material for the “Climate Variability and Fisheries Workshop: Setting Science Priorities for the Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic, and Caribbean Regions,” St. Petersburg Beach, FL, October 26-29, 2015. It was not our purpose to conduct the actual vulnerability assessments for the 70 species we reviewed. However, in some cases where they was none we assigned an assessment. The main species under consideration were subjectively selected from the top 21 species identified from 2013 NOAA commercial annual landings and values for the South Atlantic States and Gulf of Mexico regions (http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pls/webpls/MF_ANNUAL_LANDINGS) added additional species derived from the Caribbean Fisheries Management Council’s Fishery Management Plans (http://www.caribbeanfmc.com/index.html) and South Atlantic Fisheries Management Council’s managed species list. In addition, we added important recreational and highly migratory species. Each species review includes: a) an initial summary of their apparent vulnerability status and information related to their tolerances to key physical parameters; b) Rapid Assessment Profiles; c) SouthEast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) documentation; and d) additional information derived from a variety of sources. Statements of vulnerability are derived from the rapid assessment profiles, the SEDAR documentation (both detailed below), or determined by us from the available information contained in this document.
    [Show full text]