New Approaches to the Uses of Beta Blocking Drugs in Hypertension

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Approaches to the Uses of Beta Blocking Drugs in Hypertension Journal of Human Hypertension (2000) 14, Suppl 1, S63–S68 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0950-9240/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/jhh New approaches to the uses of beta blocking drugs in hypertension BNC Prichard1, BR Graham1 and JM Cruickshank2 1Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, University College, 5 University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, UK; 242 Harefield, Long Melford, Suffolk CO10 9DE, UK After a slow start, beta-blockers have become widely dial infarction where they are often under used. There used as first-line agents in the treatment of hyperten- is some evidence that even in post-infarction patients sion, and recommended as such in recently published with co-existent chronic obstructive airways disease, guidelines. There is evidence that the beta1-selective usually regarded as a contra-indication, experience an agents are more efficacious than non-selective blockers improved 2-year survival with the use of beta-blockers. that inhibit both beta1 and beta2 receptors. Notwith- Recently they have also been demonstrated to improve standing some earlier evidence to the contrary, it prognosis in heart failure patients, previously regarded appears that beta1-selective drugs are equi-effective in as a contra-indication. Likewise, recent studies have young and elderly whites, younger, ie, under mid 60s, shown that atenolol was at least as effective as captopril blacks. It is with the combination of age and being black in improving the outlook in hypertensive patients with that beta-blockers are usually less useful than some non-insulin dependant diabetes. While earlier compari- other groups of antihypertensive drugs, most notably sons with the non-selective lipid soluble propranolol calcium antagonists and diuretics. Primary prevention indicated otherwise, comparisons with beta1-selective studies indicate beta-blockers reduce the incidence of agents have indicated a similar effect on quality of life cerebro-vascular disease and coronary heart disease in assessments with angiotensin-converting enzyme younger patients but they appear less effective than inhibitors. Journal of Human Hypertension (2000) 14, Suppl diuretics in the elderly. Beta-blockers are particularly 1, S63–S68. indicated in patients who have experienced a myocar- Keywords: beta-blockers; co-existant disease; quality of life Introduction from use as it gave tumours in mice. However, when propranolol was introduced in January 1964 it was During a double-blind trial in angina pectoris with evaluated from the start in hypertension.2–4 the first clinically used beta-blocker, pronethalol, a At first there was considerable resistance to the small fall in blood pressure was noted and the anti- use of beta-blocking drugs in hypertension.5 There hypertensive effect of pronethalol was subsequently was reluctance to using drugs for hypertension that 1 reported (Figure 1). Pronethalol was withdrawn led to a rise in peripheral resistance and a fall in cardiac output. Also, as a relatively low dose of pro- pranolol completely blocked the tachycardia pro- duced by a dose of isoprenaline which previously gave a marked tachycardia, it was considered that the larger doses of propranolol required for hyper- tension treatment might be unsafe, and any clinical effect would not be due to beta-adrenergic blockade. However, a much larger dose of beta-receptor block- ing drug is required to produce a maximum reduction in the heart rate at low levels of sympath- etic activity, as in the standing position. It required persistence to overcome the initial resistance to the use of beta-blockers in the treatment of hyperten- sion. We have come a long way since Ahlquist, in 1967, was reported to have remarked at the end of the first symposium on beta-blockers in October Figure 1 Fall in blood pressure with 4 weeks pronethalol treat- 1965, ‘everything from watermelon seeds to dilute ment compared to 4 weeks of placebo in 12 normotensive angina hydrochloric acid has at one time or another suc- patients. Double-blind study average of 4 weekly readings after cessfully treated hypertension. I hope that proprano- (after Prichard1). lol does not fit into this category.’6 Beta-blockers have become first line treatment for hypertension, 7 Correspondence: Brian NC Prichard, Centre for Clinical Pharma- confirmed recently by the guidelines of JNC VI cology, University College, 5 University Street, London WC1E (Figure 2). They are also useful in combination in 6JJ, UK more resistant cases. Beta-blockers in hypertension BNC Prichard et al S64 Beta1 selectivity How beta-blockers lower the blood pressure still remains unclear, but it does seem to be a property 6,8 of beta1 blockade. As was reported early in the evaluation of beta blockade, adrenaline in the pres- ence of beta2 blockade produces a greater rise of blood pressure because its beta2 vasodilator action, previously partially offsetting its alpha vasoconstric- tor effect, is inhibited.9 It can therefore be postulated that beta2 blockade antagonises the modest back- ground vasodilator effect of circulating adrenaline, and this attenuates the fall in blood pressure from the beta1 block. This could explain the 2–3 mm Hg Figure 2 Algorithm for the treatment of hypertension (after JNC greater fall in blood pressure seen with beta1 block- VI7). ade as opposed to non-selective block. Selective beta2 blockade (ICI 118 551) does not lower the 6 Variation in the pharmacological properties of blood pressure. Our own early studies demonstrated that propran- beta-blocking drugs olol in titrated doses was equally effective to the Beta-blocking drugs differ in various aspects. Pro- then available potent antihypertensive drugs, the pranolol is a non-selective agent blocking both beta1 centrally acting methyldopa, and the adrenergic receptors, eg, at sympathetic innervation of the neurone inhibiting drugs bethanidine and guanethi- heart, and beta2 receptors eg, in bronchial and vas- dine which thus lower the blood pressure by cular smooth muscle, it also has membrane stabilis- inhibiting vasoconstrictor impulses to alpha recep- ing activity or local anaesthetic effects, though this tors.3,10 Recent large clinical trials have demon- property does not contribute to its antihypertensive strated that beta-blockers, atenolol11–14 or acebuto- effect. Propranolol is a pure antagonist, it has no par- lol15 are similar in antihypertensive effect to tial agonist activity, ie, stimulating effect, unlike examples from the major classes of hypotensive agents such as pindolol. Beta-blockers have also drugs. Similarly, in a large survey of veterans’ been developed with other properties (Table 1),6 hypertension clinic the achieved blood pressure such as alpha1 blocking activity, eg, carvedilol, a with beta-blockers was similar to other agents, with non-selective blocker which also has an anti-oxidant or without a diuretic (Table 2).16 Bisoprolol is poss- action, or nebivolol, a beta1-selective agent which ibly the most beta1 selective agent generally avail- has a nitric oxide dependant vasodilator property. able,17 as has been confirmed by recent receptor binding studies.18 There is some evidence that it may be more effective than atenolol in the control Progress in the use of beta-blockers in 17,19,20 hypertension and associated conditions of hypertension. There has been continuing progress in the field of Combination treatment beta blockade over 35 years, both in terms of phar- macological development and in the wider appreci- Weir21 and Epstein and Bakris22 have recently dis- ation of their clinical application. cussed the value of combination versus single drug regimens in the treatment of hypertension. Frishman 23 Table 1 Classification of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs et al reported a large factorial study involving a total of 512 patients where bisoprolol 2.5 mg, 10 mg ␤ ␤ Division I Non-selective ( 1 2 block) Group I ISA Membrane eg, Alprenolol, Table 2 Veterans survey hypertension clinics active Oxprenolol Group II — Membrane eg, Propranolol active No. BP level (mm Hg) Group III ISA — eg, Pindolol, Carteolol Group IV — — eg Timolol, Nadolol, One drug regimens Sotalol (+ class III) Diuretic 872 140.8/81.8 Beta-blocker 299 141.2/84.3 ␤ Division II 1-selective ACE inhibitor 489 142.2/85.9 Group I ISA Membrane eg, Acebutolol Calcium antagonist 799 149.0/86.5 active Other: one drug 267 144.7/83.8 Group III ISA — eg, Practolol, Celiprolol Group IV — — eg, Atenolol, Betaxolol, Diuretic Plus Bisoprolol, Metoprolol Beta-blocker 390 140.1/83.4 Sympatholytic 289 142.1/83.5 Division III Non-selective block and peripheral vasodilator ACE inhibitor 394 142.7/85.0 ␣ Block eg, Labetalol, Carvedilol Calcium antagonist 460 146.3/85.3 Other drug 140 146.4/84.6 Division IV Selective + peripheral vasodilator NO dependent eg, Nebivolol Total all patients 6100 144.2/84.7 vasodilation (After Perry et al.16) Journal of Human Hypertension Beta-blockers in hypertension BNC Prichard et al S65 or 40 mg, hydrochlorothiazide 6.25 mg or 25 mg, and placebo were given in all possible combi- nations. The low dose combination of bisoprolol 2.5 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 6.25 mg lowered blood pressure to less than 70 mm Hg diastolic in 61% of patients. In a further study the value of biso- prolol 5 mg and 6.25 mg hydrochlorothiazide was shown,24 while Prisant et al25 found the combi- nation with low dose hydrochlorothiazide con- trolled blood pressure to a similar extent to amlodip- ine, but both drugs were more efficacious than enalapril. Effect of age and race on the antihypertensive effect of beta-blockers in hypertension Figure 3 Percentage reduction in risk of death over 2 years beta blockade post-infarction according to systolic blood pressure It has been suggested in the past that the response (after Gottlieb et al31). of blood pressure to beta blocking drugs in the eld- erly and blacks was poor, although much of the experience which led to this opinion was based on Ischaemic heart disease non-selective agents.6 Beta-blockers are effective agents for the treatment Frishman et al24 compared bisoprolol, hydrochlor- of angina and are well established for secondary pre- othiazide and the combination.
Recommended publications
  • Cardioactive Agents : Metoprolol, Sotalol and Milrinone. Influence of Myocardial Content and Systolic Interval
    3Õ' î'qt ACUTE HAEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF THREE CARDIOACTIVE AGENTS : METOPROLOL, SOTALOL AND MILRINONE. INFLUENCE OF MYOCARDIAL CONTENT AND SYSTOLIC INTERVAL. by Rebecca Helen Ritchie, B.Sc (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ln The University of Adelaide (Faculty of Medicine) February 1994 Department of Medicine (Cardiology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital) The University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA, 5000. ll ¡ r -tL',. r,0';(', /1L.)/'t :.: 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents 1 Declaration vtl Acknowledgements v111 Publications and communications to learned societies in support of thesis D( Summary xl Chapter 1: General Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 2 1.2 Acute effeots of cardioactive drugs 3 1.2.1 Drug effects 4 l.2.2Determnants of drug effects 5 1.3 Myocardial drug gPtake of cardioactive agents 8 1.3.1 Methods of assessment in humans invívo 9 1.3.2 Results of previous studies 10 1.4Influence of cardioactive drugs on contractile state 11 1.4. 1 Conventional indices 11 I.4.2 The staircase phenomenon t2 1.4.3 The mechanical restitution curve t2 1.5 The present study t4 1.5.1 Current relevant knowledge of the acute haemodynamic effects of the cardioactive drugs under investigation r4 1.5.1.1 Metoprolol 15 1.5.1.2 Sotalol 28 1.5.1.3 Milrinone 43 1.5.2 Cunent relevant knowledge of the short-term pharmacokinetics of the cardioactive drugs under investigation 59 1.5.2.1Metoprolol 59 1.5.2.2 Sotalol 7I ll 1.5.2.3 Milrinone 78 1.5.3 Current relevant knowledge of the potential for rate-dependence of the effects of these
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Class Review Beta Adrenergic Blockers
    Drug Class Review Beta Adrenergic Blockers Final Report Update 4 July 2009 Update 3: September 2007 Update 2: May 2005 Update 1: September 2004 Original Report: September 2003 The literature on this topic is scanned periodically. The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use, or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Mark Helfand, MD, MPH Kim Peterson, MS Vivian Christensen, PhD Tracy Dana, MLS Sujata Thakurta, MPA:HA Drug Effectiveness Review Project Marian McDonagh, PharmD, Principal Investigator Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Oregon Health & Science University Copyright © 2009 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97239. All rights reserved. Final Report Update 4 Drug Effectiveness Review Project TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6 Purpose and Limitations of Evidence Reports........................................................................................ 8 Scope and Key Questions .................................................................................................................... 10 METHODS.................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Advice for Primary Care Regarding Beta Blockers in Heart Failure and Qof
    Advice for Primary Care Regarding Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure and QOF ADVICE FOR PRIMARY CARE REGARDING BETA BLOCKERS IN HEART FAILURE AND QOF Author(s): Trudi Phillips, Lead Nurse, SEWCN / Heart Failure Specialist Nurse, Cwm Taf HB Date: 20 th May 2010 Version: 4: Status Final Pathway: Heart Failure Intended Audience: Cardiac Network, GPs and Primary Care Staff Purpose and Summary of Document: To advise GPs and primary care on the initiation of Beta Blockers for patients with heart failure and changing Beta Blocker medication. Publication / Distribution: • Cardiac Network primary care distribution list • Cardiac Network GPs via email • Network website ( http://www.sewcn.wales.nhs.uk ; http://nww.sewcn.wales.nhs.uk ) • Highlight in next e-Newsletter and Heart Matters Date of Issue: 21 st May 2010 Review Date: May 2011 Date published on Network Website: 10 th May 2010 South East Wales Cardiac Network Advice for Primary Care Regarding Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure and QOF Author: Trudi Phillips. SEWCN and Cwm Taf Date: 7th May 2010 Status: Final HB Intended Audience: Page: 1 of 3 Cardiac Network GPs Primary Care Staff Advice for primary care regarding Beta-blockers in Heart Failure and QOF Carvedilol, Bisoprolol and Nebivolol (in the elderly) are the only three beta-blockers currently licensed for use in heart failure in the UK. Beta-blockade therapy for heart failure should be introduced in a ‘ start low, go slow ’ manner, with assessment of heart rate, blood pressure, and clinical status after each titration. Beta blocker Starting dose Maximum target dose Bisoprolol 1.25 mg od 10 mg od Carvedilol 3.125 mg bd 25mg bd Nebivolol (in the elderly) 1.25 mg od 10 mg od For patients with mild to moderate heart failure maximum dose of Carvedilol is 50 mg twice daily if weight more than 85 kg How to use: • Start with a low dose (see above).
    [Show full text]
  • Advantages and Disadvantages of Beta- Adrenergic Blocking Drugs in Hypertension
    Reprinted from ANCIOLOCY Vol. 29, No. -I April 1978 Copyright 0 1978 Prinred in U.S.A. All Rights Rewrced Advantages and Disadvantages of Beta- Adrenergic Blocking Drugs in Hypertension Eoin T. O'Brien DUBLIN, IRELAND General Measures Elevation of blood pressure should be regarded as one of a number of potential risk factors for cardiovascular disease-albeit a major risk factor- rather than a disease per se.' It is important to identify additional risk factors in the hypertensive patient, not only because collectively these factors may greatly magnify the cardiovascular risk, but also because modification of them may, of itself, lower the blood pressure and thus alleviate the risk and save the patient the inconvenience, expense, and potential harm that may result from even the simplest of drug regimes. Careful consideration should be given to the patient's diet (particularly in relation to the calorie intake in the case of obesity, the cholesterol and saturated fat content in the case of hyperlipidemia and patients at high risk, and the salt content) and to smoking habits, physical activity. stress. personality, and drug therapy, especially anovulant preparations. Other diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, which are associated with a high incidence of hypertension and pri- mary causes of hypertension must be excluded. Although there is still no statistical evidence to show that modification of these risk factors-with the exception of tobacco and anovulant preparations-will actually reduce mortal- ity, it does seem prudent on the basis of the evidence available to encourage the hypertensive patient to adjust his or her life-style not only to reduce the cardiovascular risk,2 but also because in many instances the mildly hypertensive patient will respond to this approach alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Class Review Antianginal Agents
    Drug Class Review Antianginal Agents 24:12.08 Nitrates and Nitrites 24:04.92 Cardiac Drugs, Miscellaneous Amyl Nitrite Isosorbide Dinitrate (IsoDitrate ER®, others) Isosorbide Mononitrate (Imdur®) Nitroglycerin (Minitran®, Nitrostat®, others) Ranolazine (Ranexa®) Final Report May 2015 Review prepared by: Melissa Archer, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacist Carin Steinvoort, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacist Gary Oderda, PharmD, MPH, Professor University of Utah College of Pharmacy Copyright © 2015 by University of Utah College of Pharmacy Salt Lake City, Utah. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1. Antianginal Therapies .............................................................................................. 4 Table 2. Summary of Agents .................................................................................................. 5 Disease Overview ........................................................................................................................ 8 Table 3. Summary of Current Clinical Practice Guidelines .................................................... 9 Pharmacology ............................................................................................................................... 10 Table 4. Pharmacokinetic Properties
    [Show full text]
  • Different Beta-Blocking Effects of Carvedilol and Bisoprolol in Humans
    Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology An Independent International Scientific Journal Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology 2001; 4 (1), 53-56 Different beta-blocking effects of carvedilol and bisoprolol in humans Koshucharova G, Klein W, Lercher P, Maier R, Stepan V Stoschitzky K, Zweiker R Homepage: www.kup.at/jcbc Online Data Base Search for Authors and Keywords Indexed in Chemical Abstracts EMBASE/Excerpta Medica Krause & Pachernegg GmbH · VERLAG für MEDIZIN und WIRTSCHAFT · A-3003 Gablitz/Austria ORIGINAL PAPERS, CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY Different Beta-Blocking Effects of Carvedilol and Bisoprolol J Clin Basic Cardiol 2001; 4: 53 Different Beta-Blocking Effects of Carvedilol and Bisoprolol in Humans G. Koshucharova, R. Zweiker, R. Maier, P. Lercher, V. Stepan, W. Klein, K. Stoschitzky Bisoprolol is a beta1-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist while carvedilol is a non-selective beta-blocker with additional blockade of alpha1-adrenoceptors. Administration of bisoprolol has been shown to cause up-regulation of β-adrenoceptor density and to decrease nocturnal melatonin release, whereas carvedilol lacks these typical effects of beta-blocking drugs. The objective of the present study was to investigate beta-blocking effects of bisoprolol and carvedilol in healthy subjects. We compared the effects of single oral doses of clinically recommended amounts of bisoprolol (2.5, 5 and 10 mg) and carvedilol (25, 50 and 100 mg) to those of placebo in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study in 12 healthy male volun- teers. Three hours after oral administration of the drugs heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest, after 10 min. of exercise, and after 15 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information a Analysed Substances
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Analyst. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 List of contents: Tab. A1 Detailed list and classification of analysed substances. Tab. A2 List of selected MS/MS parameters for the analytes. Tab. A1 Detailed list and classification of analysed substances. drug of therapeutic doping agent analytical standard substance abuse drug (WADA class)* supplier (+\-)-amphetamine ✓ ✓ S6 stimulants LGC (+\-)-methamphetamine ✓ S6 stimulants LGC (+\-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) ✓ S6 stimulants LGC methylhexanamine (4-methylhexan-2-amine, DMAA) S6 stimulants Sigma cocaine ✓ ✓ S6 stimulants LGC methylphenidate ✓ ✓ S6 stimulants LGC nikethamide (N,N-diethylnicotinamide) ✓ S6 stimulants Aldrich strychnine S6 stimulants Sigma (-)-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) ✓ ✓ S8 cannabinoids LGC (-)-11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) S8 cannabinoids LGC morphine ✓ ✓ S7 narcotics LGC heroin (diacetylmorphine) ✓ ✓ S7 narcotics LGC hydrocodone ✓ ✓ Cerillant® oxycodone ✓ ✓ S7 narcotics LGC (+\-)-methadone ✓ ✓ S7 narcotics Cerillant® buprenorphine ✓ ✓ S7 narcotics Cerillant® fentanyl ✓ ✓ S7 narcotics LGC ketamine ✓ ✓ LGC phencyclidine (PCP) ✓ S0 non-approved substances LGC lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) ✓ S0 non-approved substances LGC psilocybin ✓ S0 non-approved substances Cerillant® alprazolam ✓ ✓ LGC clonazepam ✓ ✓ Cerillant® flunitrazepam ✓ ✓ LGC zolpidem ✓ ✓ LGC VETRANAL™ boldenone (Δ1-testosterone / 1-dehydrotestosterone) ✓ S1 anabolic agents (Sigma-Aldrich)
    [Show full text]
  • COPD Agents Review – October 2020 Page 2 | Proprietary Information
    COPD Agents Therapeutic Class Review (TCR) October 1, 2020 No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, digital scanning, or via any information storage or retrieval system without the express written consent of Magellan Rx Management. All requests for permission should be mailed to: Magellan Rx Management Attention: Legal Department 6950 Columbia Gateway Drive Columbia, Maryland 21046 The materials contained herein represent the opinions of the collective authors and editors and should not be construed to be the official representation of any professional organization or group, any state Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee, any state Medicaid Agency, or any other clinical committee. This material is not intended to be relied upon as medical advice for specific medical cases and nothing contained herein should be relied upon by any patient, medical professional or layperson seeking information about a specific course of treatment for a specific medical condition. All readers of this material are responsible for independently obtaining medical advice and guidance from their own physician and/or other medical professional in regard to the best course of treatment for their specific medical condition. This publication, inclusive of all forms contained herein, is intended to be educational in nature and is intended to be used for informational purposes only. Send comments and suggestions to [email protected]. October 2020
    [Show full text]
  • CORGARD® TABLETS Nadolol Tablets USP
    CORGARD® TABLETS Nadolol Tablets USP Rx Only DESCRIPTION CORGARD (nadolol) is a synthetic nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agent designated chemically as 1-(tert-butylamino)-3-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-cis-6,7-dihydroxy-1- naphthyl)oxy]-2-propanol. Structural formula: C17H27NO4 MW 309.40 Nadolol is a white crystalline powder. It is freely soluble in ethanol, soluble in hydrochloric acid, slightly soluble in water and in chloroform, and very slightly soluble in sodium hydroxide. CORGARD (nadolol) is available for oral administration as 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg tablets. Inactive ingredients: microcrystalline cellulose, colorant (FD&C Blue No. 2), corn starch, magnesium stearate, povidone (except 20 mg and 40 mg), and other ingredients. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY CORGARD (nadolol) is a nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agent. Clinical pharmacology studies have demonstrated beta-blocking activity by showing (1) reduction in heart rate and cardiac output at rest and on exercise, (2) reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressure at rest and on exercise, (3) inhibition of isoproterenol-induced tachycardia, and (4) reduction of reflex orthostatic tachycardia. CORGARD (nadolol) specifically competes with beta-adrenergic receptor agonists for available beta receptor sites; it inhibits both the beta1 receptors located chiefly in cardiac muscle and the beta2 receptors located chiefly in the bronchial and vascular musculature, inhibiting the chronotropic, inotropic, and vasodilator responses to beta-adrenergic stimulation proportionately. CORGARD has no intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and, unlike some other beta-adrenergic blocking agents, nadolol has little direct myocardial depressant activity and does not have an anesthetic-like membrane- stabilizing action. Animal and human studies show that CORGARD slows the sinus rate and depresses AV conduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Adrenoceptors Regulating Cholinergic Activity in the Guinea-Pig Ileum 1978) G.M
    - + ! ,' Br. J. Pharmac. (1978), 64, 293-300. F'(O t.,," e reab- ,ellular PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PRESYNAPTIC _-ADRENOCEPTORS REGULATING CHOLINERGIC ACTIVITY IN THE GUINEA-PIG ILEUM 1978) G.M. Departmentof Pharmacology,Allen and HzmburysResearchLimited, Ware, Hertfordshire,SG12 ODJ I The presynaptic ct-adrenoceptors located on the terminals of the cholinergic nerves of the guinea- pig myenteric plexus have been characterized according to their sensitivities to at-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists. 2 Electrical stimulation of the cholinergic nerves supplying the longitudinal muscle of the guinea-pig ! ileum caused a twitch response. Clonidine caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of the twitch i response; the maximum inhibition obtained was 80 to 95_o of the twitch response. Oxymetazoline and xylazine were qualitatively similar to clonidine but were about 5 times less potent. Phenylephrine and methoxamine also inhibited the twitch response but were at least 10,000 times less potent than clonidine. 3 The twitch-inhibitory effects of clonidine, oxymetazoline and xylazine, but not those of phenyl- ephrine or methoxamine, were reversed by piperoxan (0.3 to 1.0 lag/ml). 4 Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) inhibited the twitch response, but also increased the basal tone of the ileum. Mepyramine prevented the increase in tone but did not affect the inhibitory action of LSD. Piperoxan or phentolamine only partially antagonized the inhibitory effect of LSD. 5 Phentolamine, yohimbine, piperoxan and tolazoline were potent, competitive antagonists of the inhibitory effect of clonidine with pA2 values of 8.51, 7.78, 7.64 and 6.57 respectively. 6 Thymoxamine was a weak antagonist of clonidine; it also antagonized the twitch-inhibitory effect of morphine.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunologic Adverse Reactions of Β-Blockers and the Skin (Review)
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 18: 955-959, 2019 Immunologic adverse reactions of β-blockers and the skin (Review) ALIN LAURENTIU TATU1, ALINA MIHAELA ELISEI1, VALENTIN CHIONCEL2, MAGDALENA MIULESCU3 and LAWRENCE CHUKWUDI NWABUDIKE4 1Medical and Pharmaceutical Research Unit/Competitive, Interdisciplinary Research Integrated Platform ‘Dunărea de Jos’, ReForm-UDJG; Research Centre in the Field of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ‘Dunărea de Jos’ University of Galați, 800010 Galati; 2Department of Cardio-Thoracic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Phamacy, 050474 Bucharest; 3Department of Morphological and Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, ‘Dunarea de Jos University’ of Galati, 800010 Galati; 4Department of Diabetic Foot Care, ‘Prof. N. Paulescu’ National Institute of Diabetes, 011233 Bucharest, Romania Received September 11, 2018; Accepted November 16, 2018 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.7504 Abstract. β-Blockers are a widely utilised class of medica- use, as well as possible therapeutic approaches to these. This tion. They have been in use for a variety of systemic disorders short review will focus on those dermatoses resulting from including hypertension, heart failure and intention tremors. β-blocker use, which have an immunologic basis. Their use in dermatology has garnered growing interest with the discovery of their therapeutic effects in the treatment of haemangiomas, their potential positive effects in wound Contents healing, Kaposi sarcoma, melanoma and pyogenic granuloma, and, more recently, pemphigus. Since β-blockers are deployed 1. Introduction in a variety of disorders, which have cutaneous co-morbidities 2. Cutaneous side - effects of β-blockers such as psoriasis, their pertinence to dermatologists cannot be 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychedelics in Psychiatry: Neuroplastic, Immunomodulatory, and Neurotransmitter Mechanismss
    Supplemental Material can be found at: /content/suppl/2020/12/18/73.1.202.DC1.html 1521-0081/73/1/202–277$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000056 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 73:202–277, January 2021 Copyright © 2020 by The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC Attribution 4.0 International license. ASSOCIATE EDITOR: MICHAEL NADER Psychedelics in Psychiatry: Neuroplastic, Immunomodulatory, and Neurotransmitter Mechanismss Antonio Inserra, Danilo De Gregorio, and Gabriella Gobbi Neurobiological Psychiatry Unit, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Abstract ...................................................................................205 Significance Statement. ..................................................................205 I. Introduction . ..............................................................................205 A. Review Outline ........................................................................205 B. Psychiatric Disorders and the Need for Novel Pharmacotherapies .......................206 C. Psychedelic Compounds as Novel Therapeutics in Psychiatry: Overview and Comparison with Current Available Treatments . .....................................206 D. Classical or Serotonergic Psychedelics versus Nonclassical Psychedelics: Definition ......208 Downloaded from E. Dissociative Anesthetics................................................................209 F. Empathogens-Entactogens . ............................................................209
    [Show full text]