DOCSLIB.ORG

Republic of Serbia Government Progress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republic of Serbia Government Progress REPUBLIC OF SERBIA GOVERNMENT OFFICE FOR KOSOVO AND METOHIJA AND OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF AFFAIRS IN THE PROCESS OF NEGOTIATION WITH THE PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT IN PRIŠTINA PROGRESS REPORT ON THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN BELGRADE AND PRIŠTINA (October 2015 – April 2016) April 2016 Contents: Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 A) Social and political situation in Kosovo and Metohija .............................................................. 2 B) Security situation in Kosovo and Metohija................................................................................. 2 C) Obligations stemming from the First Agreement ...................................................................... 5 1. Community of Serbian Municipalities ......................................................................................... 5 2. Police ............................................................................................................................................ 6 3. Judiciary ....................................................................................................................................... 7 4. Energy .......................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Telecommunications .................................................................................................................... 8 6. European integration .................................................................................................................. 10 D) Obligations stemming from Technical Agreements ................................................................ 10 1. Cadastre ...................................................................................................................................... 10 2. Civil registry books .................................................................................................................... 11 3. Customs stamp ........................................................................................................................... 11 4. University diplomas ................................................................................................................... 11 5. Freedom of movement................................................................................................................ 13 6. Regional representation .............................................................................................................. 14 7. Integrated Boundary Management (IBM) .................................................................................. 15 8. Official visits and Liaison Officers ............................................................................................ 16 E) Other topics ................................................................................................................................. 17 1. Collection of customs duties ...................................................................................................... 17 2. Development Fund for Northern Kosovo ................................................................................... 17 3. Vehicle insurance ....................................................................................................................... 17 4. Free trade .................................................................................................................................... 18 5. Bridge and “Peace Park” in Kosovska Mitrovica ...................................................................... 19 6. Civil Protection........................................................................................................................... 20 7. Agreements and the dialogue between the Chambers of Commerce ......................................... 21 8. Carriage of dangerous goods ...................................................................................................... 21 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 22 Introduction The key feature of this reporting period in the EU-facilitated dialogue between Belgrade and Priština was the evasion of the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government (PISG) in the Province to honour the substantive commitments they undertook under the First Agreement and the arrangements made on 25 August 2015. Such attitude on the part of Priština resulted in a serious hold-up in the dialogue and delays in implementing the agreed, most notably in terms of establishing the Community of Serbian Municipalities as the single most important issue for us. Various measures aimed at preventing the movement of people and goods, unilaterally taken by Priština during the same period on several occasions, did not help the process of the dialogue either. Nevertheless, Belgrade remained committed to normalizing relations with Priština. Moreover, the Serbian government continued to address all outstanding issues, responsibly and in the spirit of cooperation, never desisting from asserting the need to abide by all hitherto made agreements. This approach on the part of Belgrade brought about resolution of a number of issues outstanding in the framework of the Dialogue. Belgrade still regards the process of normalizing relations with the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government in Priština primarily as a framework mechanism for safeguarding our vital national interests in the Province, while recognizing the need to create more favourable circumstances for the historic reconciliation of the Serbian and Albanian peoples. Consequently, Belgrade has continued to view the dialogue with Priština both as an incentive to the EU integration of the Republic of Serbia and as a guarantee of stability for the entire region. Probity of such an approach has been acknowledged by the European Union, which formally initiated accession negotiations with the Republic of Serbia on 14 December 2015. Present report, covering the period from October 2015 to April 2016, comprehensively portrays the course of dialogue. A detailed overview of what has been agreed and implemented so far is segmented to three parts: the first comprises the issues and processes resulting from the First Agreement of Principles Governing the Normalization of Relations; the second comprises issues arising from the so-called technical agreements reached under the EU facilitation; and the third covers issues deriving from the arrangements made in order to overcome other, no less significant issues, which hamper further normalisation of relations. 1 A) Social and political situation in Kosovo and Metohija In the reporting period, the socio-political situation in Kosovo and Metohija remained unstable due to the prolonged political crisis which escalated between the opposition and the government. The three opposition parties (Self-Determination Movement - PS, the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo - ABK and the Initiative for Kosovo - IK) managed to postpone or interrupt several Assembly sessions by using tear gas, after which the government resorted to repressive measures. Several opposition MPs, members of the PS, were detained and sentenced to a month’s house arrest. In addition, the opposition MPs who activated tear gas were banned from attending Assembly sessions, which enabled the ruling coalition to carry out the minimum legislative work (e.g. adopt the provincial budget for 2016). Political opposition staged protests in Priština and other major cities in the Province, which, at times, turned violent. Protesters repeatedly assaulted individual public servants in the Priština administration, including Mr. Isa Mustafa. However, silent confrontation between the PS and the ABK concerning the lead role in the opposition bloc resulted in postponing the announced joint anti- governmental protests scheduled for 26 March 2016, allegedly due to the disagreements over the method of political action. In this context, the ABK advocated suspension of all violent activities and boycott of the operation of the Assembly, whereas the PS insisted on continued application of violence for the purpose of achieving political goals. Most likely, this division will continue to form the foundation of the discord in the opposition bloc in the coming period, and the ruling coalition will most likely endeavour to make use of it in order to mitigate the effects of the political crisis. At the same time, the central issue that the ruling coalition had to tackle during the reporting period was the election of the President of the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government. Having failed to ensure the required majority in the first two rounds, Hashim Thaçi was appointed to the function only after the third round of voting, held on 26 February, by means of the votes of PDK, the majority of the LDK members, as well as minority and independent MPs. It may be asserted that the overall political climate in the Province has deteriorated since the previous reporting period. Internal tensions within the Albanian political electorate have led to an increased dissatisfaction aimed at the Serbian community, which is more or less directly blamed for the bad situation in the Province.1 Due to the overall situation, the authorities demonstrated a diminished sensitivity to the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Head of the OSCE Mission in Kosovo, Ambassador Jean-Claude Schlumberger, to the OSCE Permanent Council 6 February 2014
    PC.FR/1/14 30 January 2014 OSCE+ ENGLISH only Report of the Head of the OSCE Mission in Kosovo, Ambassador Jean-Claude Schlumberger, to the OSCE Permanent Council 6 February 2014 1. Major developments in Kosovo1 The dominant topic of the reporting period was the continued dialogue between Prishtinë/Priština and Belgrade facilitated in Brussels by the European Union. On 8 September Prime Ministers Hashim Thaçi and Ivica Dačić reached an agreement on telecommunications and energy. The prime ministers met again in Brussels on 7 October, discussing modalities surrounding the 3 November local elections in Kosovo. As the facilitator for the conduct of the elections in northern Kosovo, the OSCE participated in the meeting to inform the prime ministers about the preparation process. On 5 and 13 December – just ahead of the EU Ministerial Council of 17 December, where the Council was expected to announce its decision on the date for opening accession negotiations with Serbia, European Union High Representative (EUHR) Catherine Ashton hosted another meeting of the prime ministers in Brussels to discuss the further implementation of the 19 April 2013 First Agreement of principles governing normalisation of relations between Belgrade and Prishtinë/Priština. An agreement was reached on the modalities of integrating Kosovo Serb security personnel into Kosovo Police. On 13 December the Kosovo Ministry of Internal Affairs announced that the first employment contracts were signed with former members of the Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs (MUP). On 14 December the Kosovo government announced the commencement of the implementation of the agreement on customs and the collection of VAT and excise taxes at the northern Kosovo crossing points in Jarinje (Gate 1, Leposavić/Leposaviq) and Brnjak (Gate 31, Zubin Potok), whose revenues, according to the implementation plan of the 19 April Agreement, are to be channelled into a development fund for northern Kosovo.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendments to Comprehensive Proposal for the Kosovo Status Settlement by the Negotiating Team of the Republic of Serbia
    2 March 2007 Amendments to Comprehensive Proposal For the Kosovo Status Settlement by the Negotiating Team of the Republic of Serbia 2 March 2007 1 2 March 2007 Table of Contents General Principles..................................................................................................................3 Annex I - Constitutional Provisions.....................................................................................13 Annex II -The Rights of Communities and Their Members................................................21 Annex III - Decentralization................................................................................................25 Attachment to Annex III – Delineation of Serb Majority Municipalities............................36 Annex IV - Justice System...................................................................................................44 Annex V-Religious and Cultural Heritage............................................................................49 Annex VI - International Debt..............................................................................................56 Annex VII - Property and Archives......................................................................................58 Annex VIII -Kosovo Security Sector....................................................................................63 Annex IX - International Civilian Representative.................................................................67 Annex X -European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) Mission.....................................72
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Annual Report 2006 – 2007
    OMBUDSPERSON INSTITUTION in KOSOVO SEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT 2006 – 2007 addressed to the Assembly of Kosovo Telephone: ++381 38 545 303 Telefax: ++381 38 545 302 e-mail: [email protected] web site: www.ombudspersonkosovo.org 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................................. 4 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 6 I NTRODUCTION TO THE OMBUDSPERSON INSTITUTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 T HE MANDATE OF THE OMBUDSPERSON INSTITUTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 T HE ACTING OMBUDSPERSON --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 T HE DEPUTY OMBUDSPERSON --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 P UBLIC ACCESS TO THE OMBUDSPERSON INSTITUTION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 SE LECTED HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES IN KOSOVO ........................................................................... 11 G ENERAL ISSUES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • English Language Version of This Publication Is the Official One
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe MISSION IN KOSOVO Municipal Responses to Security Incidents Affecting Communities in Kosovo and the role of Municipal Community Safety Councils December, 2011 Disclaimer: The English language version of this publication is the official one. All other language versions of this publication are translations of the original English version and are not the official document. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................2 2. LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................4 3. SERIOUS SECURITY INCIDENTS AFFECTING NON-MAJORITY COMMUNITIES IN KOSOVO – A REGIONAL OVERVIEW..................................5 3.1. Gjilan/Gnjilane region ............................................................................................6 3.2. Mitrovicë/Mitrovica region.....................................................................................8 3.3. Pejë/Peć region......................................................................................................11 3.4. Prishtinë/Priština region........................................................................................12 3.5. Prizren region........................................................................................................14 4. MUNICIPAL COMMUNITY SAFETY COUNCILS (MCSC) – INSTITUTIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned
    AK IV Lessons Learned The Treatment of Kosovo’s Non-Majority Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic Mitrovica 2020 Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................... 3 II. Lesson 1 ............................................................................................. 7 III. Lesson 2 ........................................................................................... 17 IV. Lesson 3 ........................................................................................... 28 V. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................. 40 Author’s Note: The overriding purpose of this paper is to analyse the nature of the relationship between the government, its institutions, and non- majority communities in Kosovo in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and to assess its ability and readiness to ensure the equal treatment of all citizens, regardless of ethnic or national belonging. In other words, to describe a set of lessons that this ongoing emergency has taught us about the position of those communities, and how they are treated by central authorities. As will be outlined throughout the course of this document, the pandemic did not, in and of itself, create a problem but rather served to highlight a range of issues in the implementation of legislative and constitutional provisions that regulate the rights granted to non-majority communities. It indeed exposed the government’s shortcomings in communicating and providing equal access to information and services to all of its citizens, something that is problematic in normal circumstances but that now constitute a very tangible threat to public health and security. 2 I. Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a unique set of challenges to governments across the world. While the most obvious of these challenges is the great risk that the virus poses to public health, it has also served to put a great deal of strain on economies, state institutions and has had a vast impact on the day-to-day functioning of governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Route to Durable Solutions for Idps in Kosovo
    PROFILING OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS IN KOSOVO Assessing the route to durable solutions for IDPs in Kosovo January 2018 Printed by UNHCR. Funded by the Kosovo Ministry for Communities and Return (MCR), co-funded by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the Danish Refugee Council (DRC). The Joint IDP Profiling Service (JIPS) supported the exercise throughout. Data collected in November 2016. Report prepared in September 2017. Profiling Management Group comprised the following (in alphabetical order): Danish Refugee Council (DRC), Kosovo Agency for Statistics (KAS), Kosovo Ministry for Communities and Return (MCR), Serbian Commissariat for Refugees and Migration (CRM), UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). PROFILING OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS IN KOSOVO Assessing the route to durable solutions for IDPs in Kosovo January 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 List of acronyms and abbreviations 7 INTRODUCTION 8 DISPLACEMENT CONTEXT AND REASONS FOR A PROFILING 8 PROFILING MANAGEMENT AND PREPARATORY STEPS 9 METHODOLOGY 10 TARGET POPULATIONS 10 DATA COLLECTION METHODS 11 Household survey Focus group discussions Limitations FINDINGS ON ALBANIAN IDPS 14 KEY FINDINGS 14 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 15 BASIC DEMOGRAPHIC AND DISPLACEMENT PATTERN 16 Basic population data Literacy and education levels Displacement pattern LIVING STANDARD AND ACCESS TO DOCUMENTATION 18 Housing conditions Access to education Access to healthcare Personal documentation EMPLOYMENT ACCESS AND CONDITIONS 20 Access to employment Employment arrangements
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Politics and Society of Serb Community in Kosovo After the Independence of Kosovo
    UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA Department of Balkan, Slavic & Oriental Studies MA in Politics and Economics of Contemporary Eastern & South-Eastern Europe Mapping politics and society of Serb community in Kosovo after the independence of Kosovo : Decentralization plan as an essence for stabilizing and sustaining the Serb community in Kosovo Supervisor: Student: Ioannis Armakolas Milena Radovic Thessaloniki, 2011 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS: I INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………….3 1.1. Background Information..………………………………………………………..4 1.2. Literature Review………………………………………………………………...5 II GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SERB COMMUNITY: Demographics, surroundings and types of enclaves…………………………………………………..…6 III INTRODUCING THE PROCESS OF DECENTRALIZATION…………………..15 3.1. Ahtisaari’s Decentralization Plan ……………………………………………….15 3.2. Legal Framework for Decentralization………………………………………......15 3.3. Decentralization Process in Kosovo: the acceptance………………………….....16 3.4. Kosovo Community Acceptance……………………………………………...….17 3.5. Belgrade’s Acceptance………………………………………………………..….19 IV CREATION OF NEW MUNICIPALITIES………………………………………….21 4.1. Local Elections 2009………………………………………………………….......22 4.2. Turnout of Local Elections, Facts and Figures……………………………………23 4.3. Serb Majority Municipalities…………………………………………………...…25 4.3.1. Municipality of Gracanica………………………………………………..…..25 4.3.2. Municipality of Klokot- Vrbovac………………………………………….…26 4.3.3. Municipality of Ranilug………………………………………………………26 4.3.4. Municipality of Partes………………………………………………………...27 4.3.5. Municipality of Strpce…………………………………………………….….28
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian Heritage in Kosovo and Metohia: Between Actual and Imposed History Zoran M
    Serbian Heritage in Kosovo and Metohia: Between Actual and Imposed History Zoran M. Jovanović Serbian Heritage in Kosovo and Metohia: Between Actual and Imposed History Publisher: University of Priština - Faculty of Philosophy, Kosovska Mitrovica www.fi fa.pr.ac.rs For the publisher: Prof. Branko Jovanović, Ph. D., Dean Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Branko Jovanović, Ph. D. Peer reviewers: Prof. Aleksandar Rastović, Ph. D., Th e Institute of History Belgrade, University of Niš - Faculty of Philosophy Prof. Radmilo Pekić, Ph.D., University of Priština - Faculty of Philosophy, Kosovska Mitrovica Branislav Cvetković, Ph.D., senior curator, Regional Museum Jagodina Circulation: 300 Printed by Grafi color, Kraljevo Translators: Nevena Radošević Branislav Cvetković Lector for English Sheila Macgregor-Kovačević Proofreading & Cover design: Radionica d.o.o Mapps: Dragan Brujić ISBN 978-86-6349-049-9 Zoran M. Jovanović SERBIAN HERITAGE IN KOSOVO AND METOHIA: BETWEEN ACTUAL AND IMPOSED HISTORY 2015. Between Postmodernism, Pseudohistory and Actual History istorical and artistic heritage of Kosovo and Metohia, in other words, the her- Hitage located on the Republic of Serbia’s soil, has been the subject of are great many texts, the precise number of which would be diffi cult to determine, notably – this is important – in Serbian language, and in other so-called world languages (English, Russian, French, German), while they are quite scarce, for example, in Albanian language – so scarce, that one may say they are borderline unnoticeable. Th e reason may be
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Communities Profiles
    KOSOVO COMMUNITIES PROFILES 2010 KOSOVO COMMUNITIES PROFILES ope ganization for Security and Or Co-operation in Eur Mission in Kosovo Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Mission in Kosovo KOSOVO COMMUNITIES PROFILES Foreword by the Head of the OSCE Mission in Kosovo Foreword by the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities Introduction Table Of Contents Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Mission in Kosovo Foreword by the Head of the OSCE Mission in Kosovo Dear reader, Welcome to the second edition of the Organization for Security and Co- operation in Europe Mission in Kosovo (OSCE) Communities Profiles.T he protection and promotion of community rights, as well as the monitoring of community rights compliance by Kosovo institutions, continues to be one of the OSCE Mission’s key activities. One of the challenges to building sustainable peace in Kosovo remains the lack of recognition and understanding of non-majority communities’ distinct attributes, needs and concerns, by broader society, local institutions and international stakeholders. In order to contribute to enhancing knowledge among its interlocutors, the OSCE Mission published in 009 the first Communities Profiles, incorporating demographic, socio-economic, political and cultural data on Kosovo Serbs, Kosovo Turks, Kosovo Bosniaks, Kosovo Croats, Kosovo Montenegrins, Gorani, Roma, Ashkali, Egyptians and Kosovo Albanians (in the municipalities where they constitute the minority). The success of the 009 edition, which generated a great amount of positive feedback among the OSCE Mission’s interlocutors within and outside of Kosovo, has been a crucial motivator for a second edition. The 00 Communities Profiles, expanding upon the data collected, offer an even more comprehensive and detailed picture of the challenges affecting Kosovo’s non-majority communities’ enjoyment of their rights.
    [Show full text]