DOCSLIB.ORG

Animal Feed Phosphates Outlook to 2030

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Animal Feed Phosphates Outlook to 2030 Agribusiness | Fertecon Animal Feed Phosphates Outlook to 2030 A study on the feed-grade phosphates market structure and future trends prepared by industry experts Fertecon: Animal Feed Phosphates Outlook to 2030 Contents Please find the contents and sample pages below. If you have any questions, or would like to speak to a member of our team about this report please use our contact us page. Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Foreword: Welcome to Fertecon’s market outlook report for Feed Phosphates. ............................................... 9 1.2 Introduction: The Role of Feed-grade Phosphates ............................................................................................ 10 1.3 Potential competitors to feed-grade phosphates and their limitations ............................................................ 11 1.4 Feed-grade phosphates in the general context of dietary phosphorus ............................................................. 12 1.5 The supply side of the market: recent developments and a look at the future ................................................. 16 1.6 Price outlook through to 2030 – key concepts and assumptions ...................................................................... 20 2. Product Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 23 2.1 Regulatory issues ............................................................................................................................................... 23 3. Outlook for Supply and Trade ................................................................................................. 25 3.2 Regional Supply and Trade ................................................................................................................................. 28 4. A Review of Key Producers ...................................................................................................... 46 4.1 Aliphos/EcoPhos, Belgium ................................................................................................................................. 46 4.2 Phosphea, France ............................................................................................................................................... 46 4.3 Fosfitalia Group, Italy ......................................................................................................................................... 47 4.4 Yara, Norway ...................................................................................................................................................... 47 4.5 PhosAgro, Russia ................................................................................................................................................ 48 4.6 EuroChem, Russia .............................................................................................................................................. 48 4.7 Mosaic, USA ....................................................................................................................................................... 49 4.8 Nutrien, Canada ................................................................................................................................................. 49 4.9 J. R. Simplot, USA ............................................................................................................................................... 50 4.10 OCP Group, Morocco ......................................................................................................................................... 50 5. Outlook for Demand of Feed Phosphates ............................................................................... 52 5.1 Demand Drivers ................................................................................................................................................. 52 5.2 Global Feed phosphates Demand ...................................................................................................................... 57 5.3 Regional Demand ............................................................................................................................................... 58 6. Country Level Supply-Demand Balance .................................................................................. 69 6.1 Brazil .................................................................................................................................................................. 69 6.2 China .................................................................................................................................................................. 70 6.3 Egypt .................................................................................................................................................................. 72 6.4 Finland ............................................................................................................................................................... 73 6.5 France ................................................................................................................................................................ 74 6.6 Germany ............................................................................................................................................................ 75 6.7 Italy .................................................................................................................................................................... 76 6.8 Japan .................................................................................................................................................................. 77 6.9 Lithuania ............................................................................................................................................................ 78 Copyright © 2019 IHS Markit. All Rights Reserved 3 www.agribusinessintelligence.com Fertecon: Animal Feed Phosphates Outlook to 2030 Contents 6.10 Morocco ............................................................................................................................................................. 79 6.11 Netherlands ....................................................................................................................................................... 80 6.12 Peru .................................................................................................................................................................... 81 6.13 Poland ................................................................................................................................................................ 82 6.14 Russia ................................................................................................................................................................. 83 6.15 Saudi Arabia ....................................................................................................................................................... 84 6.16 South Africa ........................................................................................................................................................ 85 6.17 Spain .................................................................................................................................................................. 86 6.18 Thailand ............................................................................................................................................................. 87 6.19 Tunisia ................................................................................................................................................................ 88 6.20 Turkey ................................................................................................................................................................ 89 6.21 United States ...................................................................................................................................................... 90 6.22 Vietnam .............................................................................................................................................................. 91 7. Production Cost ....................................................................................................................... 92 7.1 Methodology and Coverage ............................................................................................................................... 92 7.2 Production Processes ......................................................................................................................................... 93 7.3 Assumptions for Individual Producers ............................................................................................................... 94 7.4 Feed Phosphate Cost Curves for 2018 ............................................................................................................. 106 8. Prices ...................................................................................................................................... 111 8.1 Introduction, Methodology and Coverage ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evalua on of the Apparent Phosphorus Diges Bility Coefficients of Inorganic
    33 Evaluaon of the apparent phosphorus digesbility coefficients of inorganic feed phosphates for Tilapia (Oreochromis nilocus) By Caroline Biard, Product Manager, PHOSPHEA Phosphorus (P) is an essenal mineral in lapia (Oreochromis nilocus) is the were isonitrogenous and isolipidic. Ca:P fish feed as it is a component of hard most distributed and commercially was fixed at 0.92 (Table 1). The control ssues (bone, exoskeleton, scales, and cultured species globally (El‐Sayed, diet (CTRL) contained no IFP. The first teeth) and also DNA and phospholipids. It 2006). Several studies on P requirement test diet (DCP18) contained 1.8% of DCP18 is mainly supplied by feeding, since as have been reported. Yao et al. (2014) and the second test diet (MCP22.7) opposed to calcium (Ca), P content in observed opmal performances for Nile contained 1.35% of MCP22.7. Chromic natural water is low. Dietary deficiency of lapia with 8.6 g avP/kg DM. oxide was used as a market to determine P impairs metabolism resulng in Nevertheless only a few studies reported P digesbility. reduced growth and feed conversion. digesbility of IFP. Hua and Bureau Added IFP have been characterized in Various skeletal malformaons (2010) developed a P digesbility model table 2. They were finely ground just associated with reduced mineralizaon for Tilapia in which apparent digesbility before mixing with the other ingredients. of hard ssues also occur at subopmal P coefficient (ADC) of P was 93% for Ca Feed was pelleted (2‐3 mm), steamed intake (NRC, 2011). Fishmeal was a good mono basic/Na/K phosphate and 62% for and dried.
    [Show full text]
  • Unravelling the Language of Phosphorus Utilization
    Unravelling the language of phosphorus utilization Phosphorus (P), like other nutrients, is not fully absorbed No-phytic phosphorus and utilized by the animal in any feedstuff, including Phytate phosphorus has long been assumed to be inorganic feed phosphates. Accurate knowledge of the unavailable to monogastrics. Thus, the non-phytate P (i.e. P fraction which is utilized by the animal, or P value of inorganic feed phosphates) has been assumed to be fully an ingredient, is needed to formulate optimal diets for available, and therefore calculated as follows: No-Phytic livestock, maximise livestock production efficiency and P=Total P-Phytate P. However, it has been shown that, minimize P voiding. The P value can be calculated as due to the (1) intrinsic (dietary), (2) endogenous mucosal, the total P content times its “availability”. However the and (3) microbiota-associated phytases, monogastrics can high number of research techniques and concepts such partially degrade phytate. as bioavailability, digestibility, apparent digestibility, standard digestibility associated to phosphorus can generate confusion. The aim of this brochure is to create Digestible phosphorus It is the proportion of dietary P that has disappeared from clarity and avoid comparing apples with oranges when we the small intestine. It is measured by recovering the digesta talk about phosphorus in monogastric nutrition. at the terminal ileum. Relative bioavailability: This method assigns a biological value of 100% to a reference phosphate. The relative biological value of other test phosphates are determined by comparing the results obtained for a response criteria among all the P sources tested. Its value is expressed in relation to the biological value of a standard source used.
    [Show full text]
  • Ileal Digestibility and Total Tract Retention of Phosphorus in Inorganic Phosphates Fed to Broiler Chickens Using the Direct Method
    animals Article Ileal Digestibility and Total Tract Retention of Phosphorus in Inorganic Phosphates Fed to Broiler Chickens Using the Direct Method 1, 2, 1,3, Su Hyun An y, Jung Yeol Sung y and Changsu Kong * 1 Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-054-530-1225 These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 2 September 2020; Accepted: 18 November 2020; Published: 20 November 2020 Simple Summary: There is limited information on the phosphorus (P) utilization of inorganic phosphates determined using the direct method in broiler chickens. The present study aimed to determine the ileal digestibility and total tract retention of P in several inorganic phosphates in broiler chickens using the direct method. No interaction was observed between the P source and the collection site (ileal digestibility vs. total tract retention). Phosphorus utilization differed among inorganic phosphates, and the ileal digestibility of P was greater than the total tract retention. Based on the current findings, different P utilization values should be applied to each inorganic phosphate. Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine and compare the phosphorus (P) utilization of inorganic phosphates fed to broiler chickens using the direct method. On day 15 of age, six hundred forty 15-day-old male Ross 308 broiler chickens (initial body weight = 399 38 g) were ± assigned to five experimental diets with 16 birds per cage in a randomized complete block design.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytase and Other Phosphorus Reducing Feed Ingredients
    Feed Management Phytase and Other Phosphorus Reducing Feed Ingredients by Todd J. Applegate and Brian Richert - Purdue University A Key Ingredient in Livestock Roselina Angel, University of Maryland, and Poultry Nutrient Management College Park Disclaimer This fact sheet reflects the best available information Introduction on the topic as of the publication date. This fact sheet has been developed to support Date 6-18-2008 the implementation of the Natural Resources Conservation Service Feed Management 592 Practice This Feed Management Standard. The Feed Management 592 Practice Education Project was Standard was adopted by NRCS in 2003 as another funded by the USDA tool to assist with addressing resource concerns on NRCS CIG program. livestock and poultry operations. Feed management Additional information can assist with reducing the import of nutrients to the can be found at farm and reduce the excretion of nutrients in manure. http://www.puyallup.wsu. edu/dairy/nutrient- The primary constituents of diets for poultry management/default.asp and swine are plant-based ingredients which come primarily from the seeds of plants. Most of the stored This project is affiliated phosphorus (P) in plants is found in seeds mainly as a with the Livestock & component of a molecule called phytin. Phytin-P is Poultry Environmental poorly available to poultry and swine, and this Learning Center - availability varies both within and among ingredients. http://www.extension.org/ The enzyme phytase releases phosphate groups from animal+manure+managem phytin potentially making this released P available to ent. the animal, thereby reducing P excreted from poultry and swine by 15 to 30%.
    [Show full text]
  • 05 Hoffmann 2.P65
    16 Pol. J. Chem.Polish Tech., Journal Vol. of11, Chemical No. 1, 2009 Technology, 11, 1, 16 — 19, 2009, 10.2478/v10026-009-0005-2 Environmental aspects of feed phosphates production Józef Hoffmann1, Krystyna Hoffmann, Magdalena Borowiec, Marta Huculak Wroclaw University of Technology, Institute of Inorganic Technology and Mineral Fertilizers 1 Corresponding author: Józef Hoffmann, Politechnika Wroc³awska, Institute of Inorganic Technology and Mineral Fertilizers, ul. Smoluchowskiego 25, 50-372 Wroc³aw, Poland, e-mail: jó[email protected] The risks resulting from the selected feed phosphates application in animal nutrition were analyzed. The results of the analyses of the fodder phosphates obtained in laboratory conditions were presented, including the toxic and disadvantageous substances with regard to their impact upon the environment. Keywords: feed phosphates, fluorine, heavy metals. INTRODUCTION Agriculture intensification, especially animal produc- tion, results in the loss of mineral balance in the environ- The increasing pollution of the natural environment ment in many parts of the world. Phosphorus excess dis- with compounds harmful to human and animal health as plays disadvantages and can even cause degradation of the well as to the environment indicates a requirement for environment. It is an important biologically active com- periodic tests and continuous supervision. The necessity pound of all living organisms. It is found in the soil, is connected with the unintentional and (industry, trans- natural water and atmospheric precipitation. Increasing port, urbanization) also the intentional side of (agricul- the concentration of phosphorus in municipal and farm- ture) human activity and its impact upon the environment ing sewage, especially in the dung was observed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Determination of Digestibility of Phosphorus in Various Feed Phosphates for Pigs
    Institute of Animal Nutrition Andreas Berk Sjo Zwart The determination of digestibility of phosphorus in various feed phosphates for pigs Published in: Landbauforschung Völkenrode 56(2006)1-2:5-10 Braunschweig Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL) 2006 A. Berk and S. Zwart / Landbauforschung Völkenrode 1/2 2006 (56):05-10 5 The determination of digestibility of phosphorus in various feed phosphates for pigs Andreas Berk1 and Sjo Zwart2 Abstract Zusammenfassung Three balance periods of 7 days with 12 castrated males Die Bestimmung der Verdaulichkeit des Phosphors each in the life weight range from 35 kg to 60 kg were car­ bei verschiedenen Futterphosphaten beim Schwein ried out to determine the P digestibility of 3 different feed phosphates according to the guidelines of GfE (1994). The In 3 Bilanzperioden zu je 7 Tagen mit 12 kastrierten phosphates were 2 Dicalcium phosphates and 1 Calcium männlichen Schweinen wurde im Lebendmasseabschnitt Magnesium phosphate. Additional to the digestibility of P von 35 kg bis 60 kg die Verdaulichkeit des P von 3 ver­ also the Ca digestibility and in the case of the Calcium schiedenen Futterphosphaten nach den Vorgaben der GfE Magnesium phosphate the digestibility of Mg were deter­ (1994) bestimmt. Dabei handelte es sich um zwei Dicalci­ mined. umphosphate und ein Calcium Magnesium Phosphat. Differences were found in case of the P-digestibility Neben der Verdaulichkeit des P wurde auch die des Ca between 72 % and 84 %. These differences clearly reflect und im Falle des Calcium Magnesium Phosphates die des differences in chemical composition (anhydrous vs. dihy­ Mg bestimmt. drate). The digestibility of P was in all phosphates above Dabei wurden Unterschiede in der P-Verdaulichkeit der the value of the DLG table (1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging Gaps in the Agricultural Phosphorus Cycle from an Animal Husbandry Perspective—The Case of Pigs and Poultry
    sustainability Article Bridging Gaps in the Agricultural Phosphorus Cycle from an Animal Husbandry Perspective—The Case of Pigs and Poultry Michael Oster 1, Henry Reyer 1, Elizabeth Ball 2, Dario Fornara 2 ID , John McKillen 2, Kristina Ulrich Sørensen 3, Hanne Damgaard Poulsen 3, Kim Andersson 4, Daniel Ddiba 4, Arno Rosemarin 4, Linda Arata 5 ID , Paolo Sckokai 5 ID , Elizabeth Magowan 2 and Klaus Wimmers 1,6,* ID 1 Institute of Genome Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany; [email protected] (M.O.); [email protected] (H.R.) 2 Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, UK; [email protected] (E.B.); [email protected] (D.F.); [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (E.M.) 3 Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark; [email protected] (K.U.S.); [email protected] (H.D.P.) 4 Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, 10451 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] (K.A.); [email protected] (D.D.); [email protected] (A.R.) 5 Dipartimento di Economia agro-alimentare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy; [email protected] (L.A.); [email protected] (P.S.) 6 Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 8, 18059 Rostock, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-38208-68-600 Received: 15 April 2018 ; Accepted: 29 May 2018 ; Published: 1 June 2018 Abstract: Since phosphorus (P) is an essential element for life, its usage and application across agricultural production systems requires great attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Biological Characteristics of Different Hydrated Monocalcium Phosphates for Broiler Chickens* 
    Ann. Anim. Sci., Vol. 12, No. 2 (2012) 187–200, DOI: 10.2478/v10220-012-0016-4 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFERENT HYDRATED MONOCALCIUM PHOSPHATES FOR BROILER CHICKENS* * Dorota Jamroz 1 , Agnieszka Gajda-Janiak 1 , Zbigniew Wzorek 2 , Zygmunt Kowalski 2 , Janusz Kubizna 1 1Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Quality, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Chełmońskiego 38C, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland 2Institute of Chemistry and Inorganic Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-015 Kraków, Poland Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Three hydrated monocalcium phosphates differing in purity (with or without monetite, or mon- etite and calcite) and in crystalline structure were used in broiler chickens diets. The performance indices, concentration of Ca, P and Mg and activity of alkaline phosphatase in blood plasma, the content of these mineral elements in bones, and physico-mechanical parameters of femur and tibia bones were recorded. Body weight on 35th day of life, feed intake and mechanical parameters of bone quality were slightly affected by the type of phosphates used. Higher Ca and P concentration in blood was stated in chickens fed diets with greater purity of phosphates, but activity of alkaline phosphatase has increased with the admixture of monetite or calcite used in phosphates. The best parameters of bone quality were found in the treatment in which hydrated monocalcium phos- phate (MCP) with admixture of monetite and calcite was applied. Higher concentration of both Ca and Mg in bone was determined in chickens fed diets with pure phosphates. Key words: phosphates, solubility, structure, bones Phosphorus is an integral ingredient of active organic compounds in live organ- isms – phosphoproteins, enzymes and bone components.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Availability of Phosphorus in Raw and Acidulated Sinda And
    Journal of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry Volume 6 | Issue 4 ISSN: 2348-9790 Research Article Open Access Biological Availability of Phosphorus in Raw and Acidulated Sinda and Chilembwe Rock Phosphates in Broiler Chickens Mwanza G1, Simbaya J*1 and Shitumbanuma V2 1Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, the University of Zambia, Lusaka-Zambia 2Department of Soil Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, the University of Zambia, Lusaka-Zambia *Corresponding author: Simbaya J, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, The University of Zambia, PO Box 32379, Lusaka-Zambia, Fax: +260290587, Tel: +260977480577, E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Mwanza G, Simbaya J, Shitumbanuma V (2018) Biological Availability of Phosphorus in Raw and Acidulated Sinda and Chilembwe Rock Phosphates in Broiler Chickens. J Vet Sci Ani Husb 6(4): 401 Received Date: July 19, 2018 Accepted Date: October 22, 2018 Published Date: October 24, 2018 Abstract A 14 day broiler chickens feeding trial was conducted to determine bio-availability and relative biological values (RBV) of phosphorus in raw and acidulated local rock phosphates (RPs) as potential replacements for imported and more expensive di-calcium phosphate (DCP). Treatments included Raw, Sulphuric acid and Phosphoric acid acidulated Sinda and Chilembwe RPs. Bio-availability was assessed based on feed intake, body weight gains, feed conversion ratios, phosphorus retention and mineralization of tibia bones and blood serum. RBVs were calculated on the same parameters using DCP as a reference standard. Phosphorus contents in local RPs were significantly (P ≥ 0.05) lower than in DCP, but acidulating RPs with Phosphoric acid significantly increased phosphorus, but reduced calcium contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Various Feed Phosphates on Biochemical Indices of Blood and Mineral Composition of Bones in Finishing Pigs
    ACTA VET. BRNO 2010, 79:355–361; doi:10.2754/avb201079030355 Effect of Various Feed Phosphates on Biochemical Indices of Blood and Mineral Composition of Bones in Finishing Pigs Zbigniew Dobrzański1, Krystyna Pogoda-Sewerniak1, Szymon Dragan2, Daniel Korniewicz3, Krystyna Hoffmann4, Adolf Korniewicz1 1 Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland 2 Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland 3 LNB POLAND Ltd, Kiszkowo, Poland 4 Faculty of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland Received October 6, 2009 Accepted March 8, 2010 Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different chemical feed phosphates on the blood biochemical indicators and the content of main minerals of bones in finishing pigs. Over a period of 85 days of fattening, monocalcium (MCP, Finnish product), dicalcium (DCP, Polish product) and calcium-sodium (CSP, Russian product) phosphates were used in fattener feeding. The feeding was based on standard mixtures of starter, grower and finisher type. Dicalcium phosphate was produced according to the new, pro-ecological technology based on phosphoric acid. The content of Ca, Na, P, solubility of P in citric acid, and the concentration of undesirable substances (As, Cd, F, Hg and Pb) were determined in feed phosphates. At the end of the fattening period, blood was collected from 36 finishing pigs (12 from each group) and the following biochemical indicators were determined in the serum: enzymatic activity of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), creatine kinase (CK), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), lactic acid (LA); the concentration of total protein, albumins, glucose, urea, creatinine, content of triglycerides, cholesterol and its high density lipoproteins (HDL) and low density lipoproteins (LDL) fractions, and mineral components concentration (Ca, Cl, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Na, P, Zn).
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Exogenous Phytase Level and Interaction with Supplmental
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 Influence of Exogenous Phytase Level and Interaction with Supplmental Xylanase on Live Performance and Phosphorus Retention of Broilers Peyton Gilbert University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Agricultural Economics Commons, and the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Recommended Citation Gilbert, Peyton, "Influence of Exogenous Phytase Level and Interaction with Supplmental Xylanase on Live Performance and Phosphorus Retention of Broilers" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 2004. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2004 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Influence of Exogenous Phytase Level and Interaction with Supplemental Xylanase on Live Performance and Phosphorus Retention of Broilers A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Poultry Science by Peyton Gilbert Auburn University Bachelor of Science in Poultry Science, 2015 May 2017 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. Dr. Susan Watkins Thesis Director Dr. Sam Rochell Committee Member Dr. Sami Dridi Committee Member ABSTRACT Two 3-week experiments were conducted, each using 480 day-old male broilers placed randomly among 96 battery cages (5 per cage; 680cm2 per bird), to evaluate the influence of phytase supplementation, with or without supplemental xylanase, on bird performance. Individual body weights and cage feed weights were taken on days 0, 7, 14, and 21, and mean BW, body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), and FCR over each period calculated.
    [Show full text]
  • 05 Hoffmann 2.P65
    16 Pol. J. Chem.Polish Tech., Journal Vol. of11, Chemical No. 1, 2009 Technology, 11, 1, 16 — 19, 2009, 10.2478/v10026-009-0005-2 Environmental aspects of feed phosphates production Józef Hoffmann1, Krystyna Hoffmann, Magdalena Borowiec, Marta Huculak Wroclaw University of Technology, Institute of Inorganic Technology and Mineral Fertilizers 1 Corresponding author: Józef Hoffmann, Politechnika Wroc³awska, Institute of Inorganic Technology and Mineral Fertilizers, ul. Smoluchowskiego 25, 50-372 Wroc³aw, Poland, e-mail: jó[email protected] The risks resulting from the selected feed phosphates application in animal nutrition were analyzed. The results of the analyses of the fodder phosphates obtained in laboratory conditions were presented, including the toxic and disadvantageous substances with regard to their impact upon the environment. Keywords: feed phosphates, fluorine, heavy metals. INTRODUCTION Agriculture intensification, especially animal produc- tion, results in the loss of mineral balance in the environ- The increasing pollution of the natural environment ment in many parts of the world. Phosphorus excess dis- with compounds harmful to human and animal health as plays disadvantages and can even cause degradation of the well as to the environment indicates a requirement for environment. It is an important biologically active com- periodic tests and continuous supervision. The necessity pound of all living organisms. It is found in the soil, is connected with the unintentional and (industry, trans- natural water and atmospheric precipitation. Increasing port, urbanization) also the intentional side of (agricul- the concentration of phosphorus in municipal and farm- ture) human activity and its impact upon the environment ing sewage, especially in the dung was observed.
    [Show full text]