DOCSLIB.ORG

Programme & Abstract Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programme & Abstract Book PROGRAMME & ABSTRACT BOOK Josip Juraj Strossmayer Square 14 ORGANIZERS Darija Ložnjak Dizdar Institute of Archaeology Petra Rajić Šikanjić Institute for Anthropological Research SCIENTIFIC BOARD Marie Louise Stig Sørensen University of Cambridge Carola Metzner-Nebelsick Ludwig Maximillian University of Munich Stašo Forenbaher Institute for Anthropological Research Marko Dizdar Institute of Archaeology PROGRAMME Thursday, 9th February 2017 Keynote lecture 9.30-10.10 Louis D. Nebelsick Warsaw, Poland Sparagmos. Ritual violence as a communicative agent in Late Bronze Age Europe A view from the grave 10.10-10.30 Aleksandar Kapuran, Belgrade, Serbia Raško Ramadanski, Senta, Serbia Velebit, Tumulus culture necropolis in the southern Carpathian Basin 10.30-10.50 Vojislav Filipović, Belgrade, Serbia Belotić-type bronze pins and the phenomenon of long pins 10.50-11.10 discussions 11.10-11.40 coffee break 11.40-12.00 Katarina Dmitrović, Čačak, Serbia Late Bronze horizon in Stapari necropolis and its relation with the neighbouring areas 12.00-12.20 Szilvi Guba, Szécsény, Hungary Ändernde Riten. Untersuchungen im Pilinyer Brandgräberfeld von Zagyvapálfalva, Nordostungarn LATE BRONZE AGE MORTUARY PRACTICES AND SOCIETY IN THE CARPATHIAN BASIN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 3 12.20-12.40 Friday, 10th February 2017 Katalin Jankovits, Budapest, Hungary Die Reste des Textiliensackes aus dem spätbronzezeitlichen Hügelgrab (Bz D1) von 9.30-9.50 Jánosháza in Westtransdanubien Brina Švor Jernejčič, Berlin, Germany First cremation burials in south-eastern Alpine region. 12.40-13.00 A short reflection Stašto Forenbaher, Daria Ložnjak Dizdar, Zagreb, Croatia Radiocarbron dating of Late Bronze Age cremated burials in northern Croatia 9.50-10.10 Snježana Karavanić, Zagreb, Croatia 13.00-13.20 discussions Velika Gorica and Dobova - two distinctive communities in Sava valley 13.20-15.00 lunch break 10.10-10.30 Matija Črešnar, Ljubljana, Slovenia 15.00-15.20 Urnfields of north-eastern Slovenia… the devil is in the details… Hrvoje Kalafatić, Zagreb, Croatia Reversing the urn: mortuary practices at the beginning of Late Bronze Age in Sava 10.30-10.50 River Basin Verena Tiedtke, Kiel, Germany Susanne Stroch, Berlin, Germany 15.20-15.40 Who are you? - Searching for the entombing society in the Late Bronze Age urn Marija Ljuština, Belgrade, Serbia field Müllrose (East Brandenburg) Belegiš Culture communities of Serbian part of the Carpathian Basin and their Southwestern neighbours: Interaction revealed through funerary practice 10.50-11.10 discussions 15.40-16.00 11.10-11.40 coffee break Michaela Fritzl, Wien, Austria Multiple and collective burials in Urnfield culture communities at Inzersdorf ob 11.40-12.00 der Traisen and beyond (Austria) Martina Blečić Kavur, Boris Kavur, Koper, Slovenia The tale of the Beauty and the Beast 16.00-16.20 Kitti Köhler, Tamas Hajdu, Budapest, Hungary 12.00-12.20 Comparative physical anthropological analysis of cremation cemeteries from the Siniša Radović, Daria Ložnjak Dizdar, Zagreb, Croatia Late Bronze Age Carpathian Basin Funerals and feasting: a story told by animal remains 16.20-16.40 12.20-12.40 Petra Rajić Šikanjić, Daria Ložnjak Dizdar, Zrinka Premužić, Zagreb, Croatia Joanna Sofaer, Southampton, UK Children in Late Bronze Age cemeteries in the northern Croatia Mimesis at the Late Bronze Age / Early Iron Age site of Vukovar Lijeva Bara 16.40-17.00 discussions 12.40-13.00 Jovan Koledin, Novi Sad, Serbia About funerary rites of Bosut culture 4 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE LATE BRONZE AGE MORTUARY PRACTICES AND SOCIETY IN THE CARPATHIAN BASIN LATE BRONZE AGE MORTUARY PRACTICES AND SOCIETY IN THE CARPATHIAN BASIN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 5 13.00-13.20 discussions ABSTRACTS 13.20-14.40 lunch break 14.40-15.00 Petra Stipančić, Novo Mesto, Slovenia Mortuary practice on Kapiteljska njiva in Novo Mesto at the end of Late Bronze Age and the beginning of Early Iron Age through grave goods 15.00-15.20 Daria Ložnjak Dizdar, Petra Rajić Šikanjić, Zrinka Premužić, Marko Dizdar, Stašo Keynote lecture Forenbaher, Siniša Radović, Zagreb, Croatia Diversity of ritual in Late Bronze Age mortuary practices in southern Carpathian Sparagmos Basin Ritual violence as a communicative agent in Late Bronze Age Europe A view from the grave 15.20-15.30 discussions Louis Daniel NEBELSICK 15.30-16.10 This talk aims to link the remarkable tradition of scrap-hoarding i.e. violently de- Marie-Louise Stig Sørensen, Cambridge, UK stroying bronze artefacts, curating the shattered remains and finally burying them Carola Metzner-Nebelsick, München, Germany to the violent act of destruction inherent to cremation ritual, the ritual drama which Concluding remarks spans the gap between the death and apotheosis. A segmented structuralist model I have proposed in the past is expanded by a more fluid dynamic approach seeing destruction and fragmentation in cremation ritual as the culmination of the rites of separation and apotheosis that lie at the heart of the cremation process. On the basis of the early Urnfield period ostentatious grave Hart an der Alz the rituals that accompany the passage of the deceased from his bier to pyre and the pit are recon- structed focused on the hearse whose avian symbolism and ship like shape make it an appropriate vehicle to accompany the dead from private to public space and through the explosive and destructive transformation process on the pyre into an ancestral otherworld. Velebit, Tumulus culture necropolis in the southern Carpathian Basin Aleksandar KAPURAN, Raško RAMADANSKI The Velebit necropolis represents the southern edge to which the Hügelgräber cul- tural complex spread in the Carpathian Basin. Although two rescue investigations occurred in the 50’s and 70’s of the last century, results still remain unpublished. Mortuary practice represents biritual burials that indicate mixtures between new- comers and native tradition. Some of the material cultural finds permit us to specu- The Conference has been supported in part by Croatian Science Foundation late that members of this community were craftsmen or tradesmen, while the ma- under the project (IRP 11-2013-5327). jority of the population were probably cattle farmers. 6 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE LATE BRONZE AGE MORTUARY PRACTICES AND SOCIETY IN THE CARPATHIAN BASIN LATE BRONZE AGE MORTUARY PRACTICES AND SOCIETY IN THE CARPATHIAN BASIN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 7 Belotić-type bronze pins and the phenomenon of long pins for an indigenous population, which buried their dead in the mountainous area of Vojislav FILIPOVIĆ Western Serbia, while in the neighbouring areas – Middle Danube region or central Serbia can be followed completely different burial type – cremation in urns. Decorative bronze pins are a relatively common find in various prehistoric contexts, Based on the continuity of burying under the tumuli in the territory of Western primarily graves. European examples of prehistoric bronze pins are usually up to 20- Serbia that lasted for almost two millennia, where certain changes of the mortuary 25 cm in length, although there are examples that go up to 50 cm. These are pins practice represent a consequence of strong cultural influences, can assume the un- that were primarily used for decorating hair, while massive and bigger examples changed core of its local population. were probably worn as a part of the costume of that time. However, lone examples with length more than half meter appear occasionally, without any geographical and chronological patterns noticed, except for the part of northwestern Serbia and eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Late Bronze Age. Namely, in Br D period, Ändernde Riten. Untersuchungen im Pilinyer Brandgräberfeld von Zagyvapálfalva, in the area of the Jadar river valley and its tributaries and surrounding regions on the Nordostungarn left bank of the Drina river, more than a dozen bronze pins with lengths exceeding 50 Szilvia GUBA cm appear, while several examples are more than 1 meter in length. Most of these examples come from graves, or accidental finds, and although they Das spätbronzezeitliche Gräberfeld von Salgótarján-Zagyvapálfalva wurde systema- possess the form of a pin as an object, they certainly do not possess the adequate tisch erstmals in den 1920-er Jahren erforscht und insgesamt 220 Gräber freigelegt. functionality. This contribution certainly cannot and will not answer the question Die letzten Untersuchungen von 2007-2008 lieferten weitere 816 Brandgräber zum of what these artifacts were used for, instead it will attempt to reproblematize this Vorschein. phenomenon and point to the contexts of their find. Die neuesten Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Anlegung des Gräberfeldes viel früher an- gesetzt werden kann, als zuvor angenommen. Die frühesten Gräber entstammen noch aus der mittleren Bronzezeit und sind mit der charakteristischen Keramik der Hatvan-Kultur ausgestattet. Einige Gräber können auf die Koszider-Periode datiert Late Bronze horizon in Stapari necropolis and its relation with the neighboring areas werden und weitere zeigen bereits frühe Pilinyer Formen. Die ununterbrochene Be- nutzung des Gräberfeldes ist auch am Ende der Pilinyer-Kultur gut erkennbar und die Katarina DMITROVIĆ urnenfelderzeitliche Umwandlung in die Kyjatice-Kultur verlief ebenso ohne Bruch. Das Lebenszeit des Gräberfeldes überspannt also fast 600 Jahre, in der die Art und Although it has been excavated for almost six decades ago, Stapari necropolis near Weise der Bestattungen oftmals verändert haben. In unserem Beitrag werden die Užice still attracts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bronze Age Tell Communities in Context: an Exploration Into Culture
    Bronze Age Tell Kienlin This study challenges current modelling of Bronze Age tell communities in the Carpathian Basin in terms of the evolution of functionally-differentiated, hierarchical or ‘proto-urban’ society Communities in Context under the influence of Mediterranean palatial centres. It is argued that the narrative strategies employed in mainstream theorising of the ‘Bronze Age’ in terms of inevitable social ‘progress’ sets up an artificial dichotomy with earlier Neolithic groups. The result is a reductionist vision An exploration into culture, society, of the Bronze Age past which denies continuity evident in many aspects of life and reduces our understanding of European Bronze Age communities to some weak reflection of foreign-derived and the study of social types – be they notorious Hawaiian chiefdoms or Mycenaean palatial rule. In order to justify this view, this study looks broadly in two directions: temporal and spatial. First, it is asked European prehistory – Part 1 how Late Neolithic tell sites of the Carpathian Basin compare to Bronze Age ones, and if we are entitled to assume structural difference or rather ‘progress’ between both epochs. Second, it is examined if a Mediterranean ‘centre’ in any way can contribute to our understanding of Bronze Age tell communities on the ‘periphery’. It is argued that current Neo-Diffusionism has us essentialise from much richer and diverse evidence of past social and cultural realities. Tobias L. Kienlin Instead, archaeology is called on to contribute to an understanding of the historically specific expressions of the human condition and human agency, not to reduce past lives to abstract stages on the teleological ladder of social evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Puni Tekst: Engleski, Pdf (497
    Nives Majnarić-Pandžić BRONčANO I ŽELJEZNO DOBA OBRAĐIVANO U čASOPISU OPUSCULA ARCHAEOLOGICA THE BRONZE AND IRON AGES AS COVERED IN THE JOURNAL OPUSCULA ARCHAEOLOGICA Pregledni članak / Review article Nives Majnarić­Pandžić UDK: 903(497.5)”637” Odsjek za arheologiju 903(497.5)”638” Filozofski fakultet Primljeno / Received: 29. 01. 2007. Sveučilište u Zagrebu Prihvaćeno / Accepted: 10. 02. 2007. Ivana Lučića 3 HR–10000 ZAGREB U članku se navode studije, rasprave i članci koje su This article cites the studies, deliberations and arti- razni autori objavljivali tijekom pola stoljeća postoja- cles by various authors published over the past fifty nja časopisa Opuscula archaeologica (1–29). Nadalje years in the journal Opuscula archaeologica (1–29). se spominje i opći doprinos poznavanju brončanoga It furthermore mentions the general contribution to i željeznoga doba u kontinentalnoj Hrvatskoj postig- the understanding of the Bronze and Iron Ages in nut radom i objavama suradnika ovoga časopisa. U continental Croatia made by the work and publica- njemu su u daleko manjoj mjeri objavljivani radovi s tions of the contributors to this journal. The journal temama iz primorske Hrvatske. had far less published articles dealing with themes from coastal Croatia. Ključne riječi: brončano i željezno doba u časopisu Opus­ cula archaeologica, kontinentalna Hrvatska, doprinos Key words: Bronze and Iron Age in the journal Opus- pojedinih autora, znanstveni projekti Zavoda i Odsjeka cula archaeologica, continental Croatia, contribution za arheologiju of individual authors, research projects of the Ar- chaeology Institute and Department. Objavljena prapovijesna istraživanja u Hrvatskoj i Published research on prehistory in Croatia and njihovi rezultati nakon Drugoga svjetskog rata do­ its results after the Second World War have so far sada, nažalost, nisu sustavno sabrani.
    [Show full text]
  • Placer Tin Ores from Mt. Cer, West Serbia, and Their Potential Exploitation During the Bronze Age
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/264499384 Placer Tin Ores from Mt. Cer, West Serbia, and Their Potential Exploitation during the Bronze Age ARTICLE in GEOARCHAEOLOGY · NOVEMBER 2014 Impact Factor: 1.77 · DOI: 10.1002/gea.21488 READS 47 7 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Andrea Huska Wayne Powell City University of New York - Brooklyn College City University of New York - Brooklyn College 1 PUBLICATION 0 CITATIONS 22 PUBLICATIONS 253 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Wayne Powell letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 10 December 2015 Research Article Placer Tin Ores from Mt. Cer, West Serbia, and Their Potential Exploitation during the Bronze Age A. Huska,1,2,* W. Powell,1,2 S. Mitrovic,´ 3 H. A. Bankoff,3 A. Bulatovic,´ 4 V. Filipovic,´ 4 and R. Boger1,2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York 2Earth and Environmental Sciences Program, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York 3Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York 4Arheoloskiˇ Institut, Srpska Akademija Nauka i Umetnosti, Belgrade, Serbia Correspondence Tin is a rare metal that is essential for making bronze, the defining technology *Corresponding author; E-mail: of the Bronze Age. The source(s) of tin for Aegean bronze is undetermined [email protected]; but several small Bronze Age tin mines have been documented in the circum- [email protected] Aegean region.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Amber in Western and Central Balkans Bronastodobni
    Arheološki vestnik 71, 2020, 133–172; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AV.71.03 133 Bronze Age amber in Western and Central Balkans Bronastodobni jantar na zahodnem in srednjem Balkanu Mateusz CWALIŃSKI Izvleček V članku se avtor ukvarja s problematiko dotoka jantarja na zahodni in srednji Balkan v času bronaste dobe (natanč- neje okoli 1600–900 pr. n. št.) ter njegovim kroženjem med regijami tega območja. Razpoložljivi podatki, povezani s to temo, so bili analizirani z uporabo različnih računskih metod. Predhodno tipološko opredeljene jantarne jagode kažejo kronološke razlike, kar omogoča delitev na dva glavna sklopa, ki ju je mogoče pripisati srednji in mlajši oz. pozni bro- nasti dobi. Nekatere oblike so v uporabi v obeh obdobjih. Za številne tipe je značilen omejen obseg razprostranjenosti, ki verjetno govori za lokalno proizvodnjo. Tipe jantarnih jagod avtor primerja tudi z jantarnimi izdelki s sosednjih ob- močij z jantarjem. Izbrani predmeti, ki se pojavljajo skupaj z jantarjem, dodatno osvetljujejo notranjo dinamiko kroženja jantarja in kažejo na potencialne udeležence izmenjave. Ključne besede: Balkan; bronasta doba; jantar; nakit; menjava; trgovina; analiza stikov; analiza mrež Abstract The paper touches upon the issue of amber inflow to Western and Central Balkans, and its circulation between in- dividual regions situated in this zone, during the Bronze Age (more specifically around 1600–900 BC). By using several computational methods, currently available data related to this topic is re-analysed. Previously distinguished types of amber beads show chronological differentiation that allows separating them into two major assemblages assignable to the Middle and Late Bronze Age respectively, with some forms having a prolonged use, overlapping both periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Archaeologica 34 2020
    ZIRIDAVA STUDIA ARCHAEOLOGICA 34 2020 MUSEUM ARAD ZIRIDAVA STUDIA ARCHAEOLOGICA 34 2020 Editura MEGA Cluj‑Napoca 2020 MUSEUM ARAD EDITORIAL BOARD Editor‑in‑chief: Florin Mărginean, Victor Sava. Editorial Assistants: Norbert Kapcsos. EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Vitalie Bârcă (Institute of Archaeology and Art History, Cluj‑Napoca, Romania) Adina Boroneanț (“Vasile Pârvan” Institute of Archaeology, Bucharest, Romania) Marin Cârciumaru (Valahia University of Târgovişte, Romania) Sorin Cociş (Institute of Archaeology and Art History, Cluj‑Napoca, Romania) Dragoș Diaconescu (The National Museum of Banat, Timișoara, Romania) Daria Loznjak Dizdar (Institute of Archaeology, Zagreb, Croatia) Alin Frînculeasa (Prahova County Museum of History and Archaeology, Ploiești, Romania) Erwin Gáll (“Vasile Pârvan” Institute of Archaeology, Bucharest, Romania) Florin Gogâltan (Institute of Archaeology and Art History, Cluj‑Napoca, Romania) Adrian Ioniţă (“Vasile Pârvan” Institute of Archaeology, Bucharest, Romania) Hrvoje Kalafatić (Institute of Archaeology, Zagreb, Croatia) Aleksandar Kapuran (Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade, Serbia) Rüdiger Krause (Johann Wolfgang Goethe‑Universität Frankfurt, Germany) Tobias Kienlin (Universität zu Köln, Germany) Valéria Kulcsár (University of Szeged, Hungary) Sabin Adrian Luca (Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania) Barry Molloy (University College Dublin, Ireland) Sorin Nemeti (Babeş‑Bolyai University, Romania) John O’Shea (University of Michigan, USA) Karl Zeno Pinter (Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania) Ioan Stanciu (Institute of Archaeology and Art History, Cluj‑Napoca, Romania) Imre Szatmári (Munkácsy Mihály Museum, Békéscsaba, Hungary) Miklos Takács (Institute of Archaeology of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary) Ioan Marian Țiplic (Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania) In Romania, the periodical can be obtained through subscription or exchange, sent as post shipment, from Museum Arad, Arad, Piata G. Enescu 1, 310131, Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme Thursday, 24 September 2014
    14TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM OF FUNERARY ARCHAEOLOGY “Funerary Practices during the Bronze and the Iron Ages in the Central and Southeast Europe” NATIONAL MUSEUM ČAČAK (SERBIA) 24th-27th September 2015. PROGRAMME THURSDAY, 24 SEPTEMBER 2014 - 10.00-15.00 - Welcome and registration of the participants - 17.00 – Official Opening Ceremony of the 14th International Colloquium - Speakers: officials, organizers and participants - 19.00 – Dinner FRIDAY, 25 SEPTEMBER 2014 SESSION: 9.00-13.00 CHAIRPERSON:Miloš JEVTIĆ Mitja GUŠTIN (Koper - Slovenia) - RastkoVasić and his favorites Manuel FERNANDEZ-GÖTZ (University of Edinburgh - UK) -The power of the past: Ancestral cult and collective memory in the Central European Iron Age Aleksandar KAPURAN (Belgrade - Serbia), New discoveries of burial practice during the Iron Age in Eastern Serbia - 10.30-10.45. Coffee break Jan BOUZEK (Praha - Czech Rep.) - The Ring Pendants and other EIA Symbols Marija LJUŠTINA (Belgrade - Serbia), Katarina DMITROVIĆ (Čačak – Serbia)- Between Everyday Life and Eternal Rest: Middle Bronze Age in Western Morava Basin, Central Serbia 1 Miroslav LAZIĆ (Belgrade-Serbia) – Magura - la nécropole de l’âge du Bronze à Gamzigrad (Nord-est de la Serbie) Dragan JOVANOVIĆ (Vršac- Serbia) - State of Preservation of Archaeological Sites after formation of Djerdap Hydroelectric Power Plant Reservoir: a Case Study of the site Djurica. Importance of Ornamentation on the Dubovac-Žuto Brdo Culture Funerary Vessels. - Discussions • - 13.00-14.30.Lunch SESSION:15.00-19.00 CHAIRPERSON: Hrvoje POTREBICA Daria LOŽNJAK DIZDAR (Zagreb – Croatia), Petra RAJIĆ-ŠIKANJIĆ (Zagreb – Croatia) - Funerary Practices at the End of the Late Bronze Age in southern Middle Danube Region Vojislav FILIPOVIĆ (Belgrade - Serbia) - Late Bronze Age Particularities in Burial Customs in the Lower Drina Region Antoniu Tudor MARC (Deva – Romania) – Mortuary practices in the Wietenberg Culture from Transylvania - 16.30.
    [Show full text]
  • 39 I. Introduction the Site Vinča-Belo Brdo Is Situated on The
    A C T A A R LIVINGC H AWITH E oA VLIEW o OF G CARPATHIAN I C A C BASIN...A R P A T H I C 39A VoL. LII, 2017 PL ISSN 0001-5229 MARIJA Ljuština LIVING WITH A VIEW OF CARPATHIAN BASIN: Vinča-BELO BRDO, SERBIA, IN THE MIDDLE BRONZE AGE ABSTRACT Marija Ljuština 2017. Living with a View of Carpathian Basin: Vinča-Belo Brdo, Serbia, in the Middle Bronze Age, AAC 52:39–63. The focus of the article is the Vatin culture settlement at the site of Vinča-Belo Brdo in Northern Serbia. The general idea is that this settlement, whose existence was relatively short in time, benefited from being established by the Danube — a great connective factor in the world of the Middle Bronze Age. It shares many characteristics with the contemporary settlements in the south- ernmost part of the Carpathian basin, starting from the position in the vicinity of the Danube, at the places which had already been settled in prehistory, prior to the Middle Bronze Age. Not only do they have pottery style in common, but the wider repertoire of finds illustrating the material culture. What’s more, comparison of the material remains from Vinča with the neighbouring sites from the left Danube bank enlightens how the Vatin culture was integrated into a wider space of the Bronze Age cultures of the Carpathian basin, influencing the Balkans hinterland, too. K e y w o r d s: Middle Bronze Age; Vatin culture; Vinča-Belo Brdo; pottery; settlement Received: 15.07.2017; Revised: 10.12.2017; Revised: 16.02.2018; Accepted: 16.02.2018 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Grobovi Iz Kasnoga Bakrenog I Ranoga Brončanog Doba S Nalazišta Osijek
    Grobovi iz kasnog bakrenog ..., VAMZ, 3. s., XLIX (2016) 59 M. KRMPOTIĆ, L. ČATAJ, P. RAJIĆ ŠIKANJIĆ, Z. PREMUŽIĆ: Hrvatski restauratorski zavod Institut za antropologiju Marijana Krmpotić GajevaPetra Rajić 32 Šikanjić HR-10 000 Zagreb HR-10 000 Zagreb Nike Grškovića 23 [email protected] [email protected] Hrvatski restauratorski zavod Institut za antropologiju Lea Čataj GajevaZrinka Premužić32 HR-10 000 Zagreb HR-10 000 Zagreb Nike Grškovića 23 [email protected] [email protected] Grobovi iz kasnoga bakrenog i ranoga brončanog doba s nalazišta Osijek – Ciglana i Zeleno polje Late Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age graves at the site Osijek–Ciglana and Zeleno polje UDK / UDC: 904:726.821(497.5 Osijek)’’636/6373’’ Izvorni znanstveni rad / Original scientific paper Tijekom zaštitnih arheoloških istraživanja During the archaeological excavations at the na nalazištu Osijek – Ciglana i Zeleno polje site Osijek–Ciglana and Zeleno polje in 2015, 2015. godine pronađeni su ostaci višeslojnog the remains of a multi-layered settlement were naselja. Izdvaja se nalaz četiriju kosturnih found. Finds of four skeletal graves stand out, grobova, od kojih se jedan nalazio izdvoje- with one grave found isolated on the north- no na sjevernome dijelu istražene površine, ern part of the excavated area, while the other a preostala su tri grupirana 260 m južnije. three were grouped some 260 m to the south. Svi su pokojnici bili pokopani u zgrčenom All the bodies were laid in a crouched position položaju na boku. S obzirom na činjenicu da on their side. Since no grave goods or parts of u grobovima nisu nađeni prilozi ni dijelovi garment were registered in the graves and nošnje pokojnika, kao ni arheološki nalazi u there were no archaeological finds in the grave njihovim zapunama, grobovi su datirani na fill, the graves are dated based on the results of osnovi rezultata radiokarbonskih analiza ko- the radiocarbon analysis of the inhumed bones.
    [Show full text]
  • Instituta Za Arheologiju U Zagrebu
    UDK 902 Ul ISSN 1330-0644 IS VOL 18/2001. V< ZAGREB, 2001. 7/ © rLozi Instituta za arheologiju u Zagrebu Pril. Inst. arheol. Zagrebu Str./Pages 1-292, Zagreb, 2001. Pril. Inst. arheol. Zagrebu 18/2001.Časopis koji je prethodio Str./Pages 1-292, Zagreb, 2001.Prilozi 1., 1983., Prilozi 2., 1985., 3.-4., 1986.-1987., 5.-6., 1988.-1989., 7., 1990., 8. 1991., Pril. Inst. arheol. Zagrebu 9., 1992., 10., 1993., 11.-12./1994.-1995., 13.-14/1996.-1997., 15.-16/1998.-1999., 17/2000. Nakladnik/Puhlisher INSTITUT ZA ARHEOLOGIJU/ INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY Adresa uredništva/ Adress of the editor's office Institut za arheologiju/Institute of archaeology HR - 10000 Zagreb, Ulica grada Vukovara 68 Telefon/phone/fax ++385/0I/6I5 02 50 e-mail: [email protected] Glavni i od^ovorni urednik/ Editor in chief Željko TOMIČIĆ (Zagreb) Redakcijski odbor/ Editorial committee Dunja OLOGOVIĆ (Zagreb), Timotej KNIFIC (Ljubljana, SLO), Remza KOŠČEVIĆ (Zagreb). Laszlo KOVACS (Budapest. HUN), Kornelija MINICHREITER (Zagreb), Mladen RADIĆ (Osijek). Željko RAPANIĆ. (Split) Aleksandar RUTTKAY (Nitra, SK). Ivančica SCHRUNK (Minneapolis, USA), Željko TOMIČIĆ (Zagreb). Prijevod na en^leski/ Enftlish translation Nikolina MATETIĆ PELIKAN Prijevod na njemački/ German translation Nikolina MATETIĆ PELIKAN Lektura/ Lanjtuage editor Marijan R1ČKOVIĆ (hrvatski) Ulrike STEINBACH (njemački) Kenneth MAYER (engleski) Dizajn/ Desi^n Roko BOLANČA Korektura/ Proofreaders Krešimir KVOČIĆ Računalni .v/n^/ Lavom Ranko PERŠIĆ, Zagreb Tisak/ Printed by Tiskara PETRAVIĆ, d.o.o., Vladimira Nazora 12, 10434 Strmec Naklada/ Circtdation 600 primjeraka / 600 examples Sekundarne publikacije/ Indesed in GERMANIA Anzei^er der Rbmisch-Germanischen Kommission des Deutschen Arcliaeolojtischen Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Cremation Burials in the Morava Valley Between 1300 and 750 BC
    173 Cremation burials in the Morava valley between 1300 and 750 BC ^>_>5 Zusammenfassung We shall begin with the Vatin culture or the Vatin group, Brandbestattungen im Morava-Becken zwischen one of the main components in the development of the 1300 und 750 v. Chr. Am Ende der frühen Bronzezeit Bronze Age in Serbia.1 The culture was named after the site und während des größten Teils der Mittelbronzezeit war Vatin near Vršac, at the Rumanian border, which was ex- die Vatin-Kultur ein dominantes kulturelles Phänomen des cavated at the beginning of the 20th century and provided Zentralbalkans. Gegen Ende der Mittelbronzezeit traten much Bronze Age material which unfortunately was not verschiedene Gruppen in diesem Gebiet auf, die teilweise precisely recorded.2 In the beginning all the material was an die Vatin-Tradition anknüpften, aber auch neue Elemen- ascribed to the Vatin culture, but later it became clear that te enthielten. Die Belegiš-Gruppe in der Süd-Vojvodina it included finds from other periods and that not all the und Nordserbien, die Paraćin-Gruppe im mittleren Mo- material found could be connected with this culture. The rava-Becken und die Brnjica-Gruppe im Süden. Alle diese Vatin culture was recorded at many sites throughout Serbia Kulturgruppen praktizierten Kremation als bevorzugtes – apart from Vatin the most important are Židovar3, Vršac4 Bestattungsritual. Das Ende der Bronzezeit markiert das and Omoljica5 in Banat, Gomolava6 and Gradina on the Ende der Entwicklung dieser Kulturen und den Beginn des Bosut river7 in Srem, Vinča8, Ljuljaci9, Dobrača10 and Mojs- Kalakača-Horizonts, in dem Körperbestattung vorherrsch- inje11 in West Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Eneоlithic Cultures of Central and West Balkans
    I d edicate this book to my friends and teachers: Academician V ASA £llBRILOVl£ Academician ALOJZ BENAC A Professor STOJAN DIMfTRIJEVlC www.balkaninstitut.com INSTITUTEOR F BALKAN STUDIES Serbian A cademy of Sciences and Arts - Special edition No. 6 l in association with Publishing H ouse DRAGANIC -The Heritage Series Editor Academician M ilutin Garasanin General e ditor of the series Dragoslav Antonijevid: Corresponding member of the SASA BELGRADE l 995 www.balkaninstitut.com NIKOLA T ASIC ENEOLITHIC C ULTURES OF CENTRAL AND WEST BALKANS BELGRADE l 995 www.balkaninstitut.com T3 3 7 Reviewer Academician M ilutin GaraSanin English t ranslation Ivana Dordevid (pp. 9-93) ^ Nenad Tasid (pp. 1 03- 1 75) Proof-readers M arina Adamovid Nenad Tasid Layout N enad Tasid Drawings Plates h XLIII Sead Cerkez (from PJZ III, I 979) Figs, in the chapter Register... Sneiana Bekrid Published b y . The "DRAG AN l£" Co. The p ublication of this book has been financially supported by the Ministry for Sciences and Technology of the Republic of Serbia. The Research Funds of the SERBIAN ACADEMy of SCIENCES and ARTS and "MADLENA J ANKOVlC FOUNDATION" www.balkaninstitut.com CONTENTS Preface 7 Introduction 9 EARLY E NEOLITHIC I9 - T he Southern Pannonian zone 20 - T he Central Balkan zone 28 - T he Alpine slopes zone 35 - T he Adriatic zone 38 MIDDLE E NEOLITHIC 43 - T he Cernavoda III - Boler&z culture 46 - T he Baden culture 5 I - T he Kostolac culture 59 - T he Cotofeni culture 65 - T he Retz-Gajary horizon 69 - T he Pit-grave culture and the tumuli 72 LATE E NEOLITHIC 75 - T he VuCedol culture 76 - T he terminal Eneolithic of the Alpine zone 85 - T he terminal Eneolithic of the Adriatic zone 88 NOTES 9 3 REGISTERF O MAJOR ENEOLITHIC SITES IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Marija Ljuština
    - C U R R I C U L U M V I T A E - MARIJA LJUŠTINA Address: 73 Cara Dušana, Belgrade 11000, Serbia Date of Birth: 20 February 1975 Country of Birth: Yugoslavia Marital Status: Married Sex: Female E-mail: [email protected] (alternative e-mail: [email protected]) Telephone: office: +381 11 3206236 home: + 381 11 3227967 mobile: +381 64 2300456 SECONDARY AND FURTHER EDUCATION 2006-2012…………………. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology PhD studies in Prehistoric Archaeology Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 1999-2006…………………. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology Master studies in Prehistoric Archaeology M. A. Mag. in Archaeology for Prehistoric Archaeology 1993-1999…………………. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology B. A. in Archaeology for Prehistoric Archaeology 1989-1993…………………. “Karlovacka gimazija” High School, Sremski Karlovci WORK EXPERIENCE 2013-present………………. Assistant Professor University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology 2000-2012…………………. Teaching Assistant University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology Courses: Copper and Bronze Ages in South-eastern Europe, Iron Ages at the Balkans, Megaliths in European Prehistory, Aegean Bronze Age, The Celts and the Scordisci, The Illyrians and the Thracians in Pre-Roman Times, Archaeology of Palaeo-Balkan Tribes 2011-2014.............................. Collaborator on the project Society, spiritual-material culture and communication in prehistory and early history of the Balkans, supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development 2007-2010.............................. Collaborator on the project Archaeological material – base for research of cultural continuity in prehistory and antique period on the territory of Serbia, supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development 1996-present……………….
    [Show full text]