DOCSLIB.ORG

Fens for the Future Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fens for the Future Strategy FENS FOR THE FUTURE A Strategic Plan for Fenland: A Proposal for an Enhanced Ecological Network Final Report June 2012 Mere Oak Ecology Mere Oak Farm Rowley Westbury Shrewsbury Shropshire SY5 9RY T. 01743 891492 [email protected] The preparation of this plan has been largely funded by the Environment Agency and Natural England with additional financial contributions from Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust, National Trust, RSPB and Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire Wildlife Trust. All the financially contributing partners plus the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Witham Forth District Internal Drainage Board and Norfolk Wildlife Trust formed a sub‐group of the Fens of the Future Partnership to steer the preparation of the plan. The Fens for Future Partnership Steering Group: Anglia Ruskin University Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire Wildlife Trust Cambridgeshire County Council Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Country Land and Business Association Environment Agency Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust Middle Level Commissioners National Farmers Union National Trust Natural England Norfolk Wildlife Trust Peterborough City Council Rex Sly (individual farmer representative) Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Smiths Gore Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust Witham Forth District Internal Drainage Board Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. i SECTION 1 – BACKGROUND, BIODIVERSITY AND NETWORKS ................................................................ 1 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3 A step change .................................................................................................................................. 6 4 Current policies for biodiversity ...................................................................................................... 8 5 Ecosystem services........................................................................................................................ 13 6 Biodiversity ................................................................................................................................... 15 6.1 Data on Fenland biodiversity ................................................................................................ 16 6.2 County Biodiversity Action Plans .......................................................................................... 18 6.3 Fenland Species ..................................................................................................................... 21 6.4 Fens Biodiversity Audit ......................................................................................................... 22 6.5 Previous approaches to habitat creation on Fenland ........................................................... 23 6.6 Requirements for the re‐creation of wetland habitats ......................................................... 24 7 Ecological networks ...................................................................................................................... 25 7.1 Strategic River Corridors ....................................................................................................... 26 7.2 Green Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 27 8 An enhanced ecological network for Fenland .............................................................................. 30 8.1 Core areas ............................................................................................................................. 31 8.2 Corridors ............................................................................................................................... 31 8.3 Stepping stones ..................................................................................................................... 32 8.4 Restoration areas .................................................................................................................. 32 8.5 Buffer zones .......................................................................................................................... 32 8.6 Sustainable use areas ............................................................................................................ 33 SECTION 2 – OTHER CRITICAL FACTORS................................................................................................ 34 9 Other critical factors ..................................................................................................................... 35 9.1 Sustainable agriculture ......................................................................................................... 35 9.1.1 Environmentally friendly farming ................................................................................. 36 9.1.2 Farmland birds .............................................................................................................. 38 9.1.3 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 39 9.2 Peatland soils ........................................................................................................................ 40 9.3 Water management .............................................................................................................. 46 9.3.1 Water availability .......................................................................................................... 47 9.3.2 Water quality ................................................................................................................ 48 9.3.3 Flood risk management – Catchment Flood Management Plans ................................. 50 9.4 Recreation and tourism ........................................................................................................ 54 9.5 Health and quality of life ....................................................................................................... 59 9.6 Living above the water line: the importance of fenland archaeology .................................. 60 9.6.1 The ancient environment .............................................................................................. 61 9.6.2 Archaeological Survival ................................................................................................. 63 9.6.3 Conditions for preservation .......................................................................................... 65 9.6.4 New opportunities ........................................................................................................ 66 9.7 Geodiversity .......................................................................................................................... 66 9.8 The local economy ................................................................................................................ 67 9.9 The Fenland landscape.......................................................................................................... 70 9.9.1 Key characteristics ........................................................................................................ 70 9.9.2 Landscape character ..................................................................................................... 71 9.9.3 Physical Influences ........................................................................................................ 72 SECTION 3 – THE NEED FOR CHANGE: ANALYSIS AND WAY FORWARD .............................................. 74 10 The need for change ................................................................................................................. 75 10.1 Rationale for intervention ..................................................................................................... 75 10.2 SWOT analysis ....................................................................................................................... 78 10.2.1 Summary of key issues .................................................................................................. 79 10.3 Results of the data collection exercise ................................................................................. 80 10.4 Analysis of strategic options ................................................................................................. 81 10.5 Strategic alignment/fit .......................................................................................................... 83 11 Vision, mission, aims and objectives ......................................................................................... 84 11.1 Vision ..................................................................................................................................... 84 11.2 Mission .................................................................................................................................. 84 11.3 Aims and objectives .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sussex Recorder
    THE SUSSEX RECORDER Proceedings from the Biological Recorders' Seminar held at The Downlands Centre, Hassocks March 1994 Compiled and edited by Harry Montgomery Sussex Wildlife Trust Woods Mill Henfield West Sussex BN5 9SD THE SUSSEX RECORDER Proceedings from the Biological Recorders' Seminar held at The Downlands Centre, Hassocks March 1994 Compiled and edited by Harry Montgomery Sussex Wildlife Trust Woods Mill Henfield West Sussex BN5 9SD Sussex Wildlife Trust Woods Mill, Henfield, West Sussex BN5 9SD Telephone 01273 492630 Facsimile 01273 494500 The Proceedings of the 1994 Biological Recorders' Seminar The fifth Biological Recorders' Seminar took place in March and was again a very successful day. It has taken a while to prepare the proceedings as usual, but a copy is now enclosed and I hope you find it interesting. None of this work would have been possible without the help of volunteers. would particularly like to thank Dennis Dey and his team of helpers who organised the event, including the excellent lunch, and Harry Montgomery who collated, edited and organised the mailing out of the proceedings. I hope to circulate a copy of the proceedings to everyone who is interested; if you think I may have missed anyone or got a wrong address, please let me know. The document will also be on sale to the general public for £4.00 + p&p. Although there is no charge to recorders, our finances are severely stretched so any donations towards the cost would be greatly appreciated. The date for the next seminar has been set for Saturday, 25th February 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Nature Network Final Report
    Cambridge Nature Network Final Report FOREWORD I’m delighted to introduce this important report. For years, now, we have known we need to ensure nature’s recovery, and for years that has been an all-too-elusive ambition. In fact, we are still overseeing nature’s decline. It’s a ship that simply must be turned around. Now we have a clear way forward. This report, building on the ambition to double nature in Cambridgeshire, tells us precisely how and where we can do it. Working from the ground up, looking at real places and the actual state of nature, it offers for the first time a tangible plan for the revitalisation of nature in the 10km around the city of Cambridge, based on what is already there and how it can be brought back to life. And there’s more. Fully integrated with the vision for nature recovery is one for the enhancement and creation of green spaces for public recreation and refreshment – vital needs, as we have come to understand fully during the covid-19 crisis. The risk with nature recovery is that in our enthusiasm we may do the wrong thing in the wrong place: plant trees on peat or valuable grassland, or put hedgerows in where the landscape should be open. This report will ensure we do the right thing in the right place. It provides a place-based analysis of where existing nature sites can be enhanced, what kind of nature-friendly farming to encourage, how to create stepping-stones to create new, linked nature networks, and how, overall, the ambition for doubling nature can be met.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough's Green Infrastructure & Biodiversity Supplementary
    Peterborough’s Green Infrastructure & Biodiversity Supplementary Planning Document Positive Planning for the Natural Environment Consultation Draft January 2018 297 Preface How to make comments on this Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) We welcome your comments and views on the content of this draft SPD. It is being made available for a xxxx week public consultation. The consultation starts at on XX 2018 and closes on XX xxx 2018. The SPD can be viewed at www.peterborough.gov.uk/LocalPlan.There are several ways that you can comment on the SPD. Comments can be made by email to: [email protected] or by post to: Peterborough Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Draft SPD Consultation Sustainable Growth Strategy Peterborough City Council Town Hall Bridge Street Peterborough PE1 1HF All responses must be received by XX xxxx 2018. All comments received will be taken into consideration by the council before a final SPD is adopted later in 2018. 2 298 Contents 1 Introduction 4 Purpose, Status, Structure and Content of the SPD 4 Collaborative working 4 Definitions 5 Benefits of GI 5 Who should think about GI & Biodiversity 7 2 Setting the Scene 8 Background to developing the SPD 8 Policy and Legislation 8 3 Peterborough's Approach to Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity 11 Current Situation 11 Vision 12 Key GI Focus Areas 14 4 Making It Happen - GI Delivery 23 Priority GI Projects 23 Governance 23 Funding 23 5 Integrating GI and Biodiversity with Sustainable Development 24 Recommended Approach to Biodiversity for all Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment
    OUSE WASHES Landscape Character Assessment Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES CONTENTS 04 Introduction Annexes 05 Context Landscape character areas mapping at 06 Study area 1:25,000 08 Structure of the report Note: this is provided as a separate document 09 ‘Fen islands’ and roddons Evolution of the landscape adjacent to the Ouse Washes 010 Physical influences 020 Human influences 033 Biodiversity 035 Landscape change 040 Guidance for managing landscape change 047 Landscape character The pattern of arable fields, 048 Overview of landscape character types shelterbelts and dykes has a and landscape character areas striking geometry 052 Landscape character areas 053 i Denver 059 ii Nordelph to 10 Mile Bank 067 iii Old Croft River 076 iv. Pymoor 082 v Manea to Langwood Fen 089 vi Fen Isles 098 vii Meadland to Lower Delphs Reeds, wet meadows and wetlands at the Welney 105 viii Ouse Valley Wetlands Wildlife Trust Reserve 116 ix Ouse Washes 03 THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Context Sets the scene Objectives Purpose of the study Study area Rationale for the Landscape Partnership area boundary A unique archaeological landscape Structure of the report Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Context Ouse Washes LP boundary Wisbech County boundary This landscape character assessment (LCA) was District boundary A Road commissioned in 2013 by Cambridgeshire ACRE Downham as part of the suite of documents required for B Road Market a Landscape Partnership (LP) Heritage Lottery Railway Nordelph Fund bid entitled ‘Ouse Washes: The Heart of River Denver the Fens.’ However, it is intended to be a stand- Water bodies alone report which describes the distinctive March Hilgay character of this part of the Fen Basin that Lincolnshire Whittlesea contains the Ouse Washes and supports the South Holland District Welney positive management of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Faune De Belgique / Fauna Van België
    Faune de Belgique / Fauna van Belgi Bulletin de la Société royale belge d’Entomologie/Bulletin van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Entomologie, 153 (2017): 15–20 Donacia crassipes Fabricius, 1775 a rare or a neglected species in Belgium? (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Donaciinae) Kevin S CHEERS 1,2 , Edward V ERCRUYSSE 2, Vincent SMEEKENS 2 & Steven DE SAEGER 2 1 Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Kliniekstraat 25, 1070 Brussels, Belgium Abstract Donacia crassipes Fabricius, 1775 is an easily recognizable species of reed beetles (Donaciinae). The species is associated with Nymphaeaceae (both Nymphaea and Nuphar species). The species was not uncommon in Belgium until 1950, afterwards a notable decline was seen in the number of known records and from 1950 onwards only five records are known. A survey was carried out to assess the present status and distribution of the species in Belgium. 47 sites in the north of Belgium with stable populations of Nymphaeaceae were checked for the presence of D. crassipes . Of these sampled sites D. crassipes was present at 35 (74,5%) and thus the species seems currently not as rare as recent records indicated. This species was encountered for the first time in the province Limburg. Furthermore we present the first records of D. crassipes on non-indigenous water-lilies ( Nymphaea cultivars). Keywords : Donacia crassipes , Donaciinae , water beetle, reed beetle, Belgium, neglected species, Nymphaeaceae, water lilies Samenvatting Donacia crassipes Fabricius, 1775 is een relatief makkelijk herkenbaar riethaantje (Donaciinae). De soort is gebonden aan vegetaties van Nymphaeaceae (zowel Nymphaea en Nuphar soorten).
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS)
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Designation date Site Reference Number Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1JY UK Telephone/Fax: +44 (0)1733 – 562 626 / +44 (0)1733 – 555 948 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: Designated: 28 November 1985 3. Country: UK (England) 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Martin Mere 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesotrophic Rivers in Anglian Region Phase 1 June 1994
    Mesotrophic Rivers in Anglian Region Phase 1 June 1994 Dr D M Harper, University of Leicester Anglian Regional Operational Investigation 564 NRA OI/564/2/A National Rivers Authority Mesotrophic Rivers in Anglian Region Phase 1 June 1994 Dr D M Harper, University of Leicester Anglian Region 01 564 Final Report 564/2/A ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 5 9 8 3 2 National Rivers Authority KingfisherHouse Goldhay Road Orton Goldhay Peterborough PE2 OZR Tel: 0733-371811 Fax: 0733-231840 © National Rivers Authority 1994 First Published 1994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or otherwise transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the National Rivers Authority. Dissemination status Internal: Limited Release External: Restricted Statement of Use This document records the results of a preliminary review of the trophic status of rivers within Anglian Region; and recommends firther research and policy objectives for those of low nutrient status. Research Contractor This document was produced under contract OR 564 by: Dr D M Harper, Senior Lecturer with the assistance of Miss G. Evans Ecology Unit Department of Zoology University of Leicester Leicester LEI 7RH Tel: 0533-523346/7 Fax: 0533-523330 NRA Project Leader The NRA’s Project Leaders were: Mr Terry Clough - Central Area and Mr Dave Foster — Headquarters Further Information: Further information and copies of the report can be obtained from the Regional R&D Scientist, Anglian Region in our Peterborough Office Mesotrophic Rivers OI 564/2/A ii CONTENTS Tables and Figures iv Executive Summary v Keywords vi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Statutory background 1 1.2 Scientific background-----------------------------------2 ------- --------- 1.3 Project objectives-------- ~ ' 3 Chapter 2 Methodology 4 2.1 Definition of mesotrophic 4 2.2 Data selection 5 2.3 Stream selection 6 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire Local Flood Defence Committee Annual Report 1996/97
    1aA' AiO Cf E n v ir o n m e n t ' » . « / Ag e n c y Lincolnshire Local Flood Defence Committee Annual Report 1996/97 LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD DEFENCE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 1996/97 THE FOLLOWING REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE WATER RESOURCES ACT 1991 Ron Linfield Front Cover Illustration Area Manager (Northern) Aerial View of Mablethorpe North End Showing the 1996/97 Kidding Scheme May 1997 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 136076 LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD DEFENCE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 1996/97 CONTENTS Item No Page 1. Lincolnshire Local Flood Defence Committee Members 1 2. Officers Serving the Committee 3 3. Map of Catchment Area and Flood Defence Data 4 - 5 4. Staff Structure - Northern Area 6 5. Area Manager’s Introduction 7 6. Operations Report a) Capital Works 10 b) Maintenance Works 20 c) Rainfall, River Flows and Flooding and Flood Warning 22 7. Conservation and Flood Defence 30 8. Flood Defence and Operations Revenue Account 31 LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD DEFENCE COMMITTEE R J EPTON Esq - Chairman Northolme Hall, Wainfleet, Skegness, Lincolnshire Appointed bv the Regional Flood Defence Committee R H TUNNARD Esq - Vice Chairman Witham Cottage, Boston West, Boston, Lincolnshire D C HOYES Esq The Old Vicarage, Stixwould, Lincoln R N HERRING Esq College Farm, Wrawby, Brigg, South Humberside P W PRIDGEON Esq Willow Farm, Bradshaws Lane, Hogsthorpe, Skegness Lincolnshire M CRICK Esq Lincolnshire Trust for Nature Conservation Banovallum House, Manor House Street, Homcastle Lincolnshire PROF. J S PETHICK - Director Cambs Coastal Research
    [Show full text]
  • NCA Profile 42 Lincolnshire Coast and Marshes
    National Character 42. Lincolnshire Coast and Marshes Area profile: Supporting documents www.gov.uk/natural-england 1 National Character 42. Lincolnshire Coast and Marshes Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Reference: 10.0 Policy and Scrutiny
    Report Reference: 10.0 Policy and Scrutiny Open Report on behalf of the Executive Director for Communities Report to: Economic Scrutiny Comitteee Date: 19 June 2012 Subject: Waterways Projects Update KeyDecision decision? Reference: No Summary: To update members on waterways projects in development and delivery, placing them in context with the Fens Waterways Link and then looking at proposed future projects too. Actions Required: Members are asked to: 1. Note the progress to date of the waterways programme and the impact it has had on the economic prosperity of the county 2. Comment on the projects that are currently being developed 3. Comment on the use of the remaining waterways capital budget and the ongoing role of the County Coucnil in relation to the Fens Waterways Link 1. Background Lincolnshire Waterways Partnership In 2000, the county council and partners undertook a review into the opportunities for using tourism to drive economic growth. The review identified three main priorities: Historic Lincoln, destination management system, and Lincolnshire Waterways. In order to deliver the waterways programme, the Lincolnshire Waterways Partnership (LWP) was established. The partnership is co-ordinated by the county council and also includes the Environment Agency and British Waterways. The framework for the LWP comprises eight objectives: Improving the existing resource Extending the network Developing Regional Links Page 1 Developing Recreational Use of the Network Promoting the Waterways Urban and Rural Regeneration Engaging with Local Communities Developing the Partnership As well as delivering locally focused schemes, the main challenge for the LWP is to support the delivery of the Fens Waterways Link which will connect Lincolnshire’s waterways with those in the fens through the creation of a navigable link between Boston and Ely.
    [Show full text]
  • East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary
    East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document June 2010 © THE WILDLIFE TRUST FOR BEDFORDSHIRE, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE & PETERBOROUGH LTD and EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL All rights reserved. No part of the text of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any type of retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, photocopying, mechanical, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owners All mapping is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Cambridgeshire County Council 100023205 (2005). EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNTY WILDLIFE STIES REGISTER CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 METHODOLOGY 2 2.1 Field Survey 2 2.2 Assessment of Sites 3 2.3 Output Format 3 3 RESULTS 4 3.1 Statistics 4 COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES REGISTER ANNEXE Criteria for the Selection of County Wildlife Sites Version 5 (2009). CONTENTS PAGE EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES SPD 1 Introduction 1.1 The East Cambridgeshire District Council (ECDC) County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document has been produced to update the East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Register 2005 so that it can be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to the East Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework (LDF). 1.2 On the 20th October 2009 East Cambridgeshire District Council adopted its Core Strategy Development Plan Document as part of its LDF. The adoption of the Core Strategy means that most of the policies in the East Cambridgeshire District Local Plan 2000 have been superceded.
    [Show full text]