DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide to Eating Texas Fish and Crabs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide to Eating Texas Fish and Crabs Guide to Eating Texas Fish and Crabs 2009 edition Texas Department of State Health Services Seafood and Aquatic Life Group www.dshs.state.tx.us/seafood Guide revised 2008 2-9-2009 working:Layout 1 2/23/09 7:10 AM Page 1 The Seafood And Aquatic Life Group would like to thank Tracy Haywood, System Analyst Texas Department of State Health Services, Strategic Preparedness Branch. Without her expertise, knowledge, and commitment to produce a cartographically sound product, this guide would have not been possible. Cover Photo courtesy of Captain Scott Sparrow, Kingfisher Inn (Kingfisher Inn Owners, Capitain Randall and Lydia Cawlfield) 36911 Marshall Hutts Road, Arroyo City/Rio Hondo, Texas 78583, (956) 371-8801 [email protected] Guide revised 2008 2-9-2009 working:Layout 1 2/23/09 7:10 AM Page 2 Table Of Contents 2009 Texas Fish & Crab Consumption Guide Consumption Advisories, Possession Bans, Hardin ..........................................................................44 and Marine Orders ......................................................... 3 Harris ................................................................39,42, 43 How to Use This Fish Consumption Guide ................... 4 Harrison .......................................................................33 )LULÄ[ZHUK9PZRZMYVT*VUZ\TPUN Henderson ...................................................................51 Fish and Crabs .............................................................. 5 /PKHSNV ........................................................................30 .LULYHS-PZO*VUZ\TW[PVU.\PKHUJLMVY Houston .......................................................................48 Texas Waters ................................................................. 6 Hutchinson ..................................................................46 4LYJ\Y`PU-PZO@V\*H[JOMYVT;L_HZ>H[LYZ .............. 7 Jasper ....................................................................32, 49 Parasites in Fish ............................................................ 8 1LMMLYZVU ......................................................................40 9LK:VYLZ3LZPVUZHUK,_[LYUHS.YV^[OZ ................... 8 2H\MTHU ......................................................................51 *VUZ\TW[PVU.\PKHUJLMVY7\YJOHZLK-PZO ................. 9 Kenedy ........................................................................40 *SLHUHUK*VVR-PZO7YVWLYS`[V 2SLILYN ........................................................................40 9LK\JL,_WVZ\YL ........................................................ 10 Marion .........................................................................33 >H[LY)VKPLZ;LZ[LKI`+:/:>OLYL5V-PZO 4H[HNVYKH ...................................................................40 Consumption Advisories or Bans Were Issued ........... 11 Morris ....................................................................36, 37 Moore ..........................................................................46 Contaminants of Concern 5HJVNKVJOLZ ..............................................................49 Mercury ....................................................................... 14 5H]HYYV ........................................................................51 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ............................... 14 5L^[VU ........................................................................50 ++;++,(UK+++ .................................................... 15 5\LJLZ ........................................................................40 Chlordane .................................................................... 15 Panola .............................................................35, 41, 50 Toxaphene ................................................................... 15 Potter ...........................................................................46 Aldrin and Dieldrin ....................................................... 16 9LM\NPV ........................................................................40 Dioxin .......................................................................... 16 :HIPUL ...................................................................49, 50 =VSH[PSL6YNHUPJ*VTWV\UKZ=6*Z .......................... 17 :HU(\N\Z[PUL .............................................................49 ;L_HZ*V\U[`3VJH[LY4HW ......................................... 18 :HU7H[YPJPV .................................................................40 Map Key ...................................................................... 19 :OLSI` ..........................................................................50 Tarrant ...................................................................38, 52 Prohibited Waters By County Tyler .......................................................................32, 44 Calhoun ....................................................................... 24 Willacy .........................................................................40 Dallas ..................................................................... 25, 26 ,SSPZ .............................................................................. 26 Rescinded Waters By County 2H\MTHU ...................................................................... 27 Brazoria .................................................................56, 58 /PKHSNV ........................................................................ 22 Calhoun .......................................................................59 Tarrant ................................................................... 23, 26 Galveston ....................................................................58 Hardin ..........................................................................61 Advisories By County Harris ...........................................................................58 (UNLSPUH ....................................................................... 49 Harrison .......................................................................55 Aransas ........................................................................ 40 Jasper ..........................................................................61 Bexar ........................................................................... 45 1LMMLYZVU ......................................................................61 Brazoria ................................................................. 39, 40 6YHUNL .........................................................................61 Calhoun ....................................................................... 40 Panola .........................................................................60 Cameron ................................................................. 31,40 9\ZR ............................................................................60 Cass ............................................................................ 47 Tarrant .........................................................................57 Chambers ........................................................ 39, 40, 43 Titus .............................................................................63 Comal .......................................................................... 34 Travis ...........................................................................62 ,SSPZ .............................................................................. 51 )PISPVNYHWO` ..................................................64 Galveston .............................................................. 39, 40 Water Body Index ..........................................65 Guide revised 2008 2-9-2009 working:Layout 1 2/23/09 7:10 AM Page 3 2009 Texas Fish and Crab Consumption Guide Consumption Advisories, Possession Bans, and Marine Orders Fish and shellfish in several Texas water bodies contain contaminants at levels that, if consumed, may pose a threat to human health. The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) tests fish and shellfish tissues from Texas public water bodies for contaminants and informs the public of contamina- tion in fish and shellfish by issuing marine orders, possession bans (closures), and consumption advi- sories. However, the DSHS does not routinely test fish and shellfish tissues in every Texas public water body for contaminants, nor has the DSHS tested fish and shellfish tissues from every public water body in Texas. The DSHS tests fish and shellfish tissues from Texas public water bodies as resources allow. Molluscan shellfish defined as oysters, clams, and mussels pose risks that are different from fish and crabs. Because molluscan shellfish are filter feeders and often eaten raw, a program has been devel- oped to protect consumers. Molluscan shellfish harvest areas are classified on shellfish harvest maps. These maps indicate areas that are approved, conditionally approved, restricted, or prohibited for har- vest. Approved and conditionally approved harvest areas open or close based on rainfall, river flow, bacteriological results, presence of biotoxins (e.g. red tide), or illness investigations linked to a harvest area. The opening or closing of approved and conditionally approved harvest areas is directed by DSHS through issuance of a marine order. Restricted and prohibited areas are classified as such based on levels of fecal pollution, human pathogens, or contaminants. DSHS issues a marine order to classify areas as restricted or prohibited. Before harvesting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 307: Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (4/9/2008)
    Revisions to §307 - Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (updated November 12, 2009) EPA has not approved the revised definition of “surface water in the state” in the TX WQS, which includes an area out 10.36 miles into the Gulf of Mexico. Under the CWA, Texas does not have jurisdiction to regulate water standards more than three miles from the coast. Therefore, EPA’s approval of the items in the enclosure recognizes the state’s authority under the CWA out to three miles in the Gulf of Mexico, but does not extend past that point. Beyond three miles, EPA retains authority for CWA purposes EPA’s approval also does not include the application the TX WQS for the portions of the Red River and Lake Texoma that are located within the state of Oklahoma. Finally, EPA is not approving the TX WQS for those waters or portions of waters located in Indian Country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. The following sections have been approved by EPA and are therefore effective for CWA purposes: • §307.1. General Policy Statement • §307.2. Description of Standards • §307.3. Definitions and Abbreviations (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.4. General Criteria • §307.5. Antidegradation • §307.6. Toxic Materials. (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.7. Site-specific Uses and Criteria (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.8. Application of Standards • §307.9. Determination of Standards Attainment • Appendix C - Segment Descriptions • Appendix D - Site-specific Receiving Water Assessments The following sections have been partially approved by EPA: • Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Water Quality in Dickinson Bayou One TMDL for Dissolved Oxygen
    Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Program Improving Water Quality in Dickinson Bayou One TMDL for Dissolved Oxygen Water Quality in Dickinson Bayou Impaired Segment Stream Segment The state of Texas requires that water quality in Project Watershed Houston Seabrook Dickinson Bayou Tidal (Segment 1103) be suitable for Galveston swimming, wading, fishing, and a healthy aquatic HARRIS Bay ecosystem. However, water quality testing found that Webster Kemah dissolved oxygen levels in the water are occasionally low. Oxygen, which dissolves in water, is essential for the survival of aquatic life. While the amount of Friendswood Dickinson dissolved oxygen in water fluctuates naturally, various League City human activities can cause unusually or chronically low 1104 1103 dissolved oxygen levels which may harm fish and other Dickinson Bayou aquatic organisms. Alvin Texas City Santa Fe GALVESTON In response to these conditions, a total maximum daily La Marque load (TMDL) project has been initiated to evaluate the effects of low dissolved oxygen on aquatic life and to BRAZORIA determine the actions necessary to maintain water Hitchcock quality in the tidal portion of Dickinson Bayou. The goal of a TMDL is to determine the amount (or load) of a 012345 pollutant that a body of water can receive and still Miles K support its designated uses. This allowable load is then allocated among all the potential sources of pollution traffic. Rice fields in the upper watershed receive within the watershed. Measures to reduce pollutant irrigation water via canals from beyond the watershed. loads are then developed as necessary. The irrigation water returns to Dickinson Bayou in the form of irrigation return flows.
    [Show full text]
  • City Manager's Update
    CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE JULY 10, 2020 Councilman Dugie to Chair County COVID Taskforce League City Councilman Hank Dugie has been appointed by Galveston County Judge Mark Henry to chair a countywide COVID-19 Business Taskforce made up of representatives from the area’s various chambers of commerce. The taskforce will help develop and promote resources to assist the business community in remaining open while Galveston County continues to see a dramatic increase in the number of positive cases. In just the last month, the number of cases in League City has increased from 300 to 1,167. Resources developed by the taskforce will consist of guidelines and mitigation measures businesses can take to help slow the spread of the virus. The taskforce will also provide businesses with the proper steps to take when staff or a customer tests positive. The newly created “I cannot think of any better person countywide taskforce will build to help lead this effort with our local upon the efforts of the League City chambers than Councilman Hank Emergency Turnaround Taskforce, Dugie,” said County Judge Mark which was created in April to assist Henry. “His leadership during this with the reopening process in League pandemic has helped the business City. This group has since developed community in the City of League City a comprehensive website of resources to safely reopen and we want him to Councilman Dugie discussed his for businesses and implemented create a similar concept countywide.” role on the newly created taskforce several creative strategies, including a during this week’s Lunch and Learn Workplace Protection Pledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
    Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up­ wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed Fastrill Reservoir in East Texas: a Study Using
    THE PROPOSED FASTRILL RESERVOIR IN EAST TEXAS: A STUDY USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS Michael Ray Wilson, B.S. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2009 APPROVED: Paul Hudak, Major Professor and Chair of the Department of Geography Samuel F. Atkinson, Minor Professor Pinliang Dong, Committee Member Michael Monticino, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Wilson, Michael Ray. The Proposed Fastrill Reservoir in East Texas: A Study Using Geographic Information Systems. Master of Science (Applied Geography), December 2009, 116 pp., 26 tables, 14 illustrations, references, 34 titles. Geographic information systems and remote sensing software were used to analyze data to determine the area and volume of the proposed Fastrill Reservoir, and to examine seven alternatives. The controversial reservoir site is in the same location as a nascent wildlife refuge. Six general land cover types impacted by the reservoir were also quantified using Landsat imagery. The study found that water consumption in Dallas is high, but if consumption rates are reduced to that of similar Texas cities, the reservoir is likely unnecessary. The reservoir and its alternatives were modeled in a GIS by selecting sites and intersecting horizontal water surfaces with terrain data to create a series of reservoir footprints and volumetric measurements. These were then compared with a classified satellite imagery to quantify land cover types. The reservoir impacted the most ecologically sensitive land cover type the most. Only one alternative site appeared slightly less environmentally damaging. Copyright 2009 by Michael Ray Wilson ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge my thesis committee members, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report (PDF)
    a report from ENVIRONMENT TEXAS H o n e H EXECUTIVE SUMMARY You can’t count the many ways that state parks make life better here in Texas. They protect the clean water that we depend on. They provide a home for some of Texas’ most wondrous wildlife. The beautiful natural scenery of our parks provides a backdrop for some of the most amazing hikes you can imagine. And the breadth and range of those parks gives people all across Texas untold opportunities for fishing, swimming, camping and other recreational activities. Unfortunately, our parks system is in a state of crisis. Rampant disrepair and staff shortages due to years of budget cuts hinder the parks’ ability to protect the resources they house. In addition, the Legislature has failed to appropriate funds to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to invest for the future by acquiring new park lands. With Texas’ population expected to double in the next few decades, demand will grow for access to parks and more of our treasured natural areas will be threatened by encroaching development. Polling done by Texas Tech University found that Texans “are becoming increasingly frustrated about the lack of access to lands to experience nature.” Already, urban and suburban development is encroaching on treasured natural landscapes. The effects of population growth will be strongest in Texas’s largest cities. While the state of Texas maintains sizable parks in west Texas and other parts of the state, our metropolitan areas are notably underserved. While the state currently averages about 52 acres of parkland per 1000 people, in the cities it is far worse.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    ______________________________ Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE GUIDE TO CAMPING . 2 THE SCOUT LAW . 3 THE SCOUT OATH . 3 THE OUTDOOR CODE . 4 LEAVE NO TRACE . 4 TREAD LIGHTLY! . 4 SOUTHERN REGION 3 (SR-3) ADDRESSES . 5 WHERE TO GO CAMPING BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – TEXAS . 6 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – ARKANSAS . 7 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – COLORADO. 7 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – LOUISIANA . 7 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – NEW MEXICO . 8 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – OKLAHOMA . 8 BSA PROPERTIES - OTHER COUNCIL PROPERTIES . 9 BSA PROPERTIES – HIGH ADVENTURE (LAND ORIENTED) . 10 BSA PROPERTIES – HIGH ADVENTURE (WATER ORIENTED). 12 NATIONAL PARKS/FEDERAL LANDS IN TEXAS . 13 TEXAS STATE PARKS. 14 CORP OF ENGINEER LAKES – CENTRAL TEXAS . 19 LCRA PARKS/CAMPGROUNDS. 19 OTHER CAMPGROUNDS IN CENTRAL TEXAS . 20 1 Tonkawa Lodge 99 * 2019 Edition * Capitol Area Council __________________________________ Introduction A purpose of the Order of the Arrow is to “promote camping, responsible outdoor adventure, and environmental stewardship as essential components of every Scout’s experience, in the unit, year-round, and in summer camp.” Camping and outdoor adventure are at the heart of the purpose of the Order of the Arrow. Camping and the outdoor adventure are at the core of the mission of Scouting. It is with this focus that the Arrowmen of Tonkawa Lodge 99 present this revised camping guide to the units of our council and any units who are looking to discover new opportunities for camping and exploration. This revision updates some of the changes that have occurred in Scouting, revises outdated information, and provides new locations for camping and outdoor adventures.
    [Show full text]
  • 07-77817-02 Final Report Dickinson Bayou
    Dickinson Bayou Watershed Protection Plan February 2009 Dickinson Bayou Watershed Partnership 1 PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY The preparation of this report was financed though grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................................. 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 10 SUMMARY OF MILESTONES ........................................................................................................................ 13 FORWARD ................................................................................................................................................... 17 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 The Dickinson Bayou Watershed ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Forests & Grasslands in Texas
    Cooperative Wildlife Management Areas Designated trails (in miles) (USFS/Texas Parks and Wildlife Department) Multi-use Angelina National Forest Ranger Multi-use Mountain NATIONAL FORESTS & Hiking non- District Motorized Bike Bannister 25,658 acres motorized Davy Crockett National Forest Angelina 2.7 GRASSLANDS IN TEXAS Davy Alabama Creek 14,561 acres Crockett 22 52 Sabine National Forest FINGERTIP FACTS Sabine 1 Moore Plantation 26,455 acres FOREST SUPERVISOR – Eddie Taylor Sam Houston 120 85 20 Caddo National Grassland Caddo/LBJ 0 92 4 Caddo 16,150 acres TOTALS 147.7 144 85 24 Sam Houston National Forest THE ORGANIZATION: Four National Forests and two National Grasslands comprising 675,816 Sam Houston 162,984 acres acres in 15 counties make up the National Minerals Forests & Grasslands in Texas. Forest Supervisor Permitted wells 299 Wilderness Areas Headquarters is in Lufkin. Approximately 140 Reserved/Outstanding Mineral Acres 203,339 Angelina National Forest employees make up the workforce. 2000 Soil Resource Inventory – Order II: 675,832 acres completed. Turkey Hill 5,473 acres This completes the Order II update for the NFGT. Upland Island 13,331acres Angelina National Forest Established in 1934 Davy Crockett National Forest Ranger District Office in Zavalla Designated miles of roads Big Slough 3,639 acres Acres: 153,334 State County USFS Sabine National Forest Acres per county: Angelina, 58,684; Jasper, 21,023; San Augustine, 64,389; Nacogdoches, 9,238 1,836 1,598 2,394 Indian Mounds 12,369acres Davy Crockett National Forest Sam Houston National Forest Established 1934 Ongoing research projects Little Lake Creek 3,855 acres Ranger District Office in Ratcliff Wildlife (8) & Fisheries (2) 10 Botanical 3 Acres: 160,467 Silvicultural 1 Insects 1 Acres per county: Houston, 93,155; Trinity, 67,312 Archeology 2 Chemical 0 Long-term Soil Productivity 1 TOTAL 18 Sabine National Forest Established 1934 Grazing – 5,000 AUMs graze on 17,438 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Management Activities and Practices
    WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND PRACTICES COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLANNING GUIDELINES for the Pineywoods Ecological Region Revised April 2010 The following Texas Parks & Wildlife Department staff have contributed to this document: Mike Krueger, Technical Guidance Biologist – Lampasas Kirby Brown, Private Lands and Habitat Program Director (Retired) Rick Larkin, formerly of TPWD Micah Poteet, Technical Guidance Biologist – Lufkin Linda Campbell, Program Director, Private Lands and Public Hunting Program—Austin Linda McMurry, Private Lands and Public Hunting Program Assistant – Austin With Additional Contributions From: Terry Turney, Rare Species Biologist, San Marcos Trey Carpenter, Manager, Granger Wildlife Management Area Dale Prochaska, Private Lands Biologist – Kerr Wildlife Management Area Nathan Rains, Private Lands Biologist – Cleburne TABLE OF CONTENTS Comprehensive Wildlife Management Planning Guidelines for the Pineywoods Ecological Region Introduction Specific Habitat Management Practices Habitat Control Erosion Control Predator Control Providing Supplemental Water Providing Supplemental Food Providing Supplemental Shelter Census APPENDICES APPENDIX A: General Habitat Management Considerations, Recommendations,and Intensity Levels APPENDIX B: Detemining Qualification for Wildlife Management Use APPENDIX C: Wildlife Management Plan Overview APPENDIX D: Livestock Management Recommendations APPENDIX E: Vegetation Management Recommendations APPENDIX F: Specific Management Recommendations for White-tailed Deer APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Water Resources Institute
    Texas Water Resources Institute Summer 1989 Volume 15 No. 2 Optimizing Reservoir Management New Strategies Including Systems Operation and Reallocation May Boost Reservoir Yields By Ric Jensen Information Specialist, TWRI Many experts believe Texas can increase its surface water supplies without building new dams and reservoirs. The answer isn't magic. The solution is better management and coordination of existing reservoirs. New strategies/hat make every drop of water count include operating a group of reservoirs as a coordinated system; converting some reservoir storage space from hydropower production, flood control, and navigation to water supplies; and timing water levels in reservoirs to correspond to seasonal differences in streamflows and water demands. Scientists are learning more about the quality of water in lakes and how man's activities affect the chemical makeup of reservoirs. A number of important developments are already taking place. Both the City of Dallas and the Brazos River Authority manage their reservoir systems so that releases of water are tied to climate conditions water demands. The Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) has recently submitted a management plan to the Texas Water Commission (TWC) that could allow LCRA to sell "interruptible water supplies" during wet years. Opportunities to reallocate storage space in Texas reservoirs have been summarized in recent report by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Otherstudies have described how systems operation could increase water supplies in reservoirs in the Sabine, Trinity, and Trinity-San Jacinto River basins. 1 Optimizing reservoir management has been the focus of many university research projects. Scientists at Texas A&M University have been studying the Brazos River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • (USDA) Forest Service Working with Partners for Bird Conservation
    U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service Appendix A Working with Partners for Bird Conservation Bird Conservation Accomplishments Published 2004 This appendix lists the bird conservation accomplishment projects by USDA Forest Service Deputy Areas: National Forest Systems, Research and Development, State and Private and International Programs. This is not a complete set of the many bird conservation actions that have been or are currently being implemented across Forest Service Deputy Areas. It represents bird conservation accomplishment projects from the administrative units that replied at the time of the request. Projects started before fiscal year 2000 that are ongoing or conducted annually (beyond 2002) are reported as “ongoing” or “annually”, with the date of inception included (when known). I. National Forest Systems Region 1 (R-1): Northern Region Regionwide Accomplishments Partnership Enhancement • Partners in Flight (PIF) and Bird Conservation Region (BCR) Plans. Forest Service biologists throughout the Northern Region participated in the development of PIF and BCR plans for Montana, Idaho, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Active participation is ongoing with PIF working groups, BCR coordinators, joint venture meetings, and other activities that promote bird conservation. Partners in these efforts include the American Bird Conservancy (ABC), Montana Fish, Wildlife, & Parks (MFWP), Idaho Department of Fish and Game 1 (Idaho Fish & Game), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Potlatch Corp., Plum Creek Timber Co., local Audubon Society Chapters, and the Universities of Montana and Idaho. Ongoing since FY1993. • Montana Sage Grouse and Sagebrush Conservation Strategy. The Northern Region participated in the Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks-led effort to develop a statewide sage grouse and sagebrush conservation strategy.
    [Show full text]