DOCSLIB.ORG

Bayous and Galveston Bay Report Card - with Additional Details

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bayous and Galveston Bay Report Card - With Additional Details Water Recreation Safety (fecal bacteria): Bayous: C Galveston Bay: A Action Items: Report sewage spills, collect pet waste, proper maintenance of septic and aerobic on-site sewage treatment, and pump out boat sewage in designated facilities Dissolved Oxygen (aquatic life health): Bayous: A Galveston Bay: A Action Items: preserve and restore habitats by planting native plants and removing invasive, exotic species; slow runoff by reducing paved areas, use rain gardens and rainfall harvesting Phosphorus (eutrophication/ algae blooms): Bayous: C Galveston Bay: B Action Items: Proper use of fertilizers, use of slow release and organic plant fertilizers; avoid or reduce phosphates in cleaning products Nitrogen (eutrophication/ algae blooms): Bayous: A Galveston Bay: B Action Items: Proper use of fertilizers, use of slow release and organic plant fertilizers Litter and Trash (wildlife entanglement/ingestion, aesthetics): Bayous: I Galveston Bay: I Action Items: Participate in clean-ups, clean your surroundings, report littering and illegal dumping, dispose of trash properly and encourage others to do the same Grades: A = Excellent B = Good C = Adequate for now D = Requires Action F = Critical I = Insufficient Data (since Texas does not measure floatable debris as a water quality standard in the manner it does other pollutants) For additional details on this report card, see the Details below. Additional details on the Galveston Bay conditions and grading methodology are at: www.galvbaygrade.org To report pollution observations, see the link to the Galveston Bay Action Network at: http://galvbay.org/how-we-protect-the-bay/in-our-communities/galveston-bay-action-network/ This report card made possible by the partnership with: The data reviewed for this report card was obtained from: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas General Land Office Texas Parks and Wildlife Department National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Texas Water Development Board Texas Colonial Waterbird Society Texas Department of State Health Services Additional Details: This report used the most recent data available from the source agencies: 2014. Scoring Criteria: Grade % Exceedance A 0-20 Fit for the Future B 21-40 Adequate for Now C 41-60 Maintained with Current Actions D 61-80 Requires Action F 81-100 Critical Need I (insufficient data) Incomplete Water Recreation Safety: Galveston Bay system: C Galveston Bay: A Insufficient data if number of samples is below 10 Galveston Bay rivers and bayous: C Total # of Total % of Total # of Samples (E. coli + GBEP Watersheds Exceedances (E. Exceedance Grade Entero) coli + Entero) (E. coli + Entero) Estuary 154 0 0% A Bay Total 314 20 6% A All System Total 1939 846 44% C GBEP Watersheds Addicks Reservoir 46 23 50% C Armand-Taylor Bayou 79 21 27% B Austin-Bastrop Bayou 34 20 59% C Barker Reservoir 26 10 38% B Brays Bayou 237 153 65% D Buffalo Bayou 202 140 69% D Cedar Bayou 21 8 38% B Chocolate Bayou 8 2 25% I Clear Creek 60 25 42% C Dickinson Bayou 45 21 47% C East Bay 2 0 0% I Greens Bayou 255 124 49% C Houston Ship Channel 212 87 41% C North Bay 5 1 20% I San Jacinto River 51 7 14% A Sims Bayou 126 73 58% C South Bay 12 6 50% C Trinity Bay 7 3 43% I Trinity River 12 0 0% A West Bay 50 23 46% C White Oak Bayou 135 79 59% C GBEP Watershed Total 1625 826 51% C Dissolved Oxygen: Dissolved Oxygen Galveston Bay system A Galveston Bay A Insufficient data if number of samples is below 10 Rivers and Bayous A Tributary # of Samples # of Exceedance % of Exceedance Grade Tidal 1265 192 15% A Non-tidal 833 47 6% A Tributary Totals 2098 239 11% A Bay # of Samples # of Exceedance % of Exceedance Estuary 547 9 2% A Bay Total 547 9 2% A All System Total 2645 248 9% A GBEP Watersheds # of Samples # of Exceedance % of Exceedance Grade Addicks Reservoir 27 0 0% A Armand-Taylor Bayou 94 11 12% A Austin-Bastrop Bayou 53 12 23% B Barker Reservoir 15 0 0% A Brays Bayou 187 19 10% A Buffalo Bayou 167 14 8% A Cedar Bayou 29 3 10% A Chocolate Bayou 23 6 26% B Clear Creek 75 9 12% A Dickinson Bayou 65 16 25% B East Bay 7 0 0% I Greens Bayou 206 20 10% A Houston Ship Channel 557 90 16% A North Bay 28 0 0% A San Jacinto River 160 2 1% A Sims Bayou 121 16 13% A South Bay 19 1 5% A Trinity Bay 24 6 25% B Trinity River 79 0 0% A West Bay 63 11 17% A White Oak Bayou 99 3 3% A GBEP Watershed Total 2098 239 11% A Nitrogen: Nitrogen Galveston Bay system A 2014 Galveston Bay B Insufficient data if number of samples is below 10 Rivers and Bayous A # of % of Tributary # of Samples Grade Exceedance Exceedance Tidal 523 63 12% A Non-tidal 766 176 23% B Tributary Totals 1289 239 19% A # of % of Bay # of Samples Exceedance Exceedance Estuary 151 31 21% B Bay Total 151 31 21% B All System Total 1440 270 19% A # of % of GBEP Watersheds # of Samples Grade Exceedance Exceedance Addicks Reservoir 31 12 39% B Armand-Taylor Bayou 66 2 3% A Austin-Bastrop Bayou 29 1 3% A Barker Reservoir 17 5 29% B Brays Bayou 170 71 42% C Buffalo Bayou 154 11 7% A Cedar Bayou 16 1 6% A Chocolate Bayou 9 0 0% I Clear Creek 46 12 26% B Dickinson Bayou 39 2 5% A East Bay 2 0 0% I Greens Bayou 193 28 15% A Houston Ship Channel 191 44 23% B North Bay 5 0 0% I San Jacinto River 51 0 0% A Sims Bayou 106 34 32% B South Bay 9 0 0% I Trinity Bay 8 0 0% I Trinity River 11 0 0% A West Bay 41 1 2% A White Oak Bayou 95 15 16% A GBEP Watershed Total 1289 239 19% A Phosphorus: Galveston Bay system C Galveston Bay B Insufficient data if number of samples is below 10 Rivers and Bayous C # of % of Tributary # of Samples Grade Exceedance Exceedance Tidal 502 125 25% B Non-tidal 757 421 56% C Tributary Totals 1259 546 43% C # of % of Bay # of Samples Exceedance Exceedance Estuary 159 53 33% B Bay Total 159 53 33% B All System Total 1418 599 42% C # of % of GBEP Watersheds # of Samples Grade Exceedance Exceedance Addicks Reservoir 31 25 81% F Armand-Taylor Bayou 62 2 3% A Austin-Bastrop Bayou 28 2 7% A Barker Reservoir 17 14 82% F Brays Bayou 169 103 61% D Buffalo Bayou 150 71 47% C Cedar Bayou 17 3 18% A Chocolate Bayou 8 0 0% I Clear Creek 43 23 53% C Dickinson Bayou 36 0 0% A East Bay 1 0 0% I Greens Bayou 191 135 71% D Houston Ship Channel 187 33 18% A North Bay 4 0 0% I San Jacinto River 51 0 0% A Sims Bayou 105 72 69% D South Bay 9 1 11% I Trinity Bay 6 0 0% I Trinity River 11 0 0% A West Bay 40 5 13% A White Oak Bayou 93 57 61% D GBEP Watershed Total 1259 546 43% C .
Recommended publications
  • San Jacinto Battleground and State Historical Park: a Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan

    San Jacinto Battleground and State Historical Park: a Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan

    Volume 2002 Article 3 2002 San Jacinto Battleground and State Historical Park: A Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan I. Waynne Cox Steve A. Tomka Raba Kistner, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Cox, I. Waynne and Tomka, Steve A. (2002) "San Jacinto Battleground and State Historical Park: A Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2002, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2002.1.3 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2002/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. San Jacinto Battleground and State Historical Park: A Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2002/iss1/3 San Jacinto Battleground State Historical Park A Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan by I.
  • Improving Water Quality in Dickinson Bayou One TMDL for Dissolved Oxygen

    Improving Water Quality in Dickinson Bayou One TMDL for Dissolved Oxygen

    Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Program Improving Water Quality in Dickinson Bayou One TMDL for Dissolved Oxygen Water Quality in Dickinson Bayou Impaired Segment Stream Segment The state of Texas requires that water quality in Project Watershed Houston Seabrook Dickinson Bayou Tidal (Segment 1103) be suitable for Galveston swimming, wading, fishing, and a healthy aquatic HARRIS Bay ecosystem. However, water quality testing found that Webster Kemah dissolved oxygen levels in the water are occasionally low. Oxygen, which dissolves in water, is essential for the survival of aquatic life. While the amount of Friendswood Dickinson dissolved oxygen in water fluctuates naturally, various League City human activities can cause unusually or chronically low 1104 1103 dissolved oxygen levels which may harm fish and other Dickinson Bayou aquatic organisms. Alvin Texas City Santa Fe GALVESTON In response to these conditions, a total maximum daily La Marque load (TMDL) project has been initiated to evaluate the effects of low dissolved oxygen on aquatic life and to BRAZORIA determine the actions necessary to maintain water Hitchcock quality in the tidal portion of Dickinson Bayou. The goal of a TMDL is to determine the amount (or load) of a 012345 pollutant that a body of water can receive and still Miles K support its designated uses. This allowable load is then allocated among all the potential sources of pollution traffic. Rice fields in the upper watershed receive within the watershed. Measures to reduce pollutant irrigation water via canals from beyond the watershed. loads are then developed as necessary. The irrigation water returns to Dickinson Bayou in the form of irrigation return flows.
  • THE LYNCHBURG VOLUNTEERS 1 2 3 by Trevia Wooster Beverly, Bernice Mistrot, and Mike Vance ©Baytown Historical Preservation Association4

    THE LYNCHBURG VOLUNTEERS 1 2 3 by Trevia Wooster Beverly, Bernice Mistrot, and Mike Vance ©Baytown Historical Preservation Association4

    An Application for a Texas Historical Marker Presented to the Harris County Historical Commission – September 12, 2016 THE LYNCHBURG VOLUNTEERS 1 2 3 by Trevia Wooster Beverly, Bernice Mistrot, and Mike Vance ©Baytown Historical Preservation Association4 “The people of Texas do now constitute a free, sovereign and independent republic.”5 PREFACE6 From the colonial era until today, America has depended upon citizen soldiers in times of crisis requiring a military response. These men—and now women—set aside their personal and professional affairs to join or form military organizations. And, once the crisis was resolved, resumed their civilian occupations until they were again needed as soldiers. This was especially a characteristic of frontiersmen, one which they carried with them In the 1820’s and 1830’s as their line of settlement moved beyond the western border of the United States of America into the Spanish and then Mexican territory of Texas. I. CONTEXT 7 The area now known as Baytown was home to many who, arriving as early as 1822, would 8 9 become active in the struggle for Texas independence that culminated in 1836. Nathaniel Lynch, for whom the town of Lynchburg is named, arrived in Texas in the summer of 1822 with his wife and three children. On his one-league Mexican land grant, he established a trading post and a sawmill. 10 Together with Arthur McCormick, he operated the Lynchburg Ferry, which has been in continuous 11 12 operation since 1822. David Gouverneur Burnet brought a steam sawmill to the area in 1831. Midway Landing was not a town speculation, but the dock area on Black Duck Bay at the plantation 13 14 of William Scott, who had purchased the land from John D.
  • City Manager's Update

    City Manager's Update

    CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE JULY 10, 2020 Councilman Dugie to Chair County COVID Taskforce League City Councilman Hank Dugie has been appointed by Galveston County Judge Mark Henry to chair a countywide COVID-19 Business Taskforce made up of representatives from the area’s various chambers of commerce. The taskforce will help develop and promote resources to assist the business community in remaining open while Galveston County continues to see a dramatic increase in the number of positive cases. In just the last month, the number of cases in League City has increased from 300 to 1,167. Resources developed by the taskforce will consist of guidelines and mitigation measures businesses can take to help slow the spread of the virus. The taskforce will also provide businesses with the proper steps to take when staff or a customer tests positive. The newly created “I cannot think of any better person countywide taskforce will build to help lead this effort with our local upon the efforts of the League City chambers than Councilman Hank Emergency Turnaround Taskforce, Dugie,” said County Judge Mark which was created in April to assist Henry. “His leadership during this with the reopening process in League pandemic has helped the business City. This group has since developed community in the City of League City a comprehensive website of resources to safely reopen and we want him to Councilman Dugie discussed his for businesses and implemented create a similar concept countywide.” role on the newly created taskforce several creative strategies, including a during this week’s Lunch and Learn Workplace Protection Pledge.
  • Bookletchart™ Houston Ship Channel – Alexander Island to Carpenters Bayou NOAA Chart 11329

    Bookletchart™ Houston Ship Channel – Alexander Island to Carpenters Bayou NOAA Chart 11329

    BookletChart™ Houston Ship Channel – Alexander Island to Carpenters Bayou NOAA Chart 11329 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the leads to Goose Creek. Private poles and markers may at times mark the preferred route. Goose Creek contains numerous oil wells, pipelines, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration pilings, and other hazards; local knowledge is advised. The creek is used National Ocean Service by oil well supply and commercial fishing vessels. Office of Coast Survey The highway bridge 2.8 miles above the entrance has a 48-foot fixed span with a clearance of 9 feet. Two highway and two railroad bridges www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov between the entrance and this bridge have fixed spans with a minimum 888-990-NOAA width of 32 feet and minimum clearance of 14 feet. Overhead power cables crossing the creek between the mouth and the highway bridge What are Nautical Charts? 2.8 miles above the entrance have a least clearance of 36 feet. Baytown, 4 miles above Morgans Point on the NE side of the channel, is Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show the site of the Exxon Company, U.S.A., refining facilities. water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much About 1.5 miles above the Baytown facilities, a privately maintained more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and channel leads in a SW direction from the main ship channel along the efficient navigation.
  • Deep-Water Bottom Dropping Page 6 FISHING

    Deep-Water Bottom Dropping Page 6 FISHING

    Doves usher in a new season * September 12, 2008 Texas’ Premier Outdoor Newspaper Volume 5, Issue 2 * Report on Page 6 www.lonestaroutdoornews.com INSIDE Flyway rivalry prompts HUNTING Texas’ dove research Timing of hunt causes stir among hunters BY CRAIG NYHUS on doves. A team was out two days prior to the hunting season to collect Dove hunters in Texas have long bird specimens for a study compar- feared a federal requirement for the ing the effectiveness of lead and non- use of nonlead shot to pursue their lead shot. But some outfitters and hunters were taken aback by the early Grayson County has become quarry. The state holds the same con- cerns, especially after other states in shooting. famous for its big bucks in the the Central Flyway tried to force Texas Parks and Wildlife biologists state’s lone archery-only Texas to require nonlead shot based are in the first year of a multi-year county. A petition to modify on their waterfowl studies, according study to determine the effectiveness the archery-only rule has many GUNNING FOR RESEARCH: Using volunteer hunters, TPW biologists are to officials. of different load types on wild hunters up in arms. conducting a three-year study of shot effectiveness on dove, but the early That was the genesis of Texas’ own mourning doves using trained Page 7 hunt caused a PR nightmare for officials. Photo by TPW. study on the effect of nonlead shot See DOVE, Page 16 Teal are arriving on schedule along the Texas coast in time for the early season.
  • Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee

    Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee

    Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee May 25, 2012 Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, & Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, & San Antonio Bays Basin & Bay Area Stakeholders Committee (GSA BBASC) Work Plan for Adaptive Management Preliminary Scopes of Work May 25, 2012 May 10, 2012 The Honorable Troy Fraser, Co-Presiding Officer The Honorable Allan Ritter, Co-Presiding Officer Environmental Flows Advisory Group (EFAG) Mr. Zak Covar, Executive Director Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Dear Chairman Fraser, Chairman Ritter and Mr. Covar: Please accept this submittal of the Work Plan for Adaptive Management (Work Plan) from the Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee (BBASC). The BBASC has offered a comprehensive list of study efforts and activities that will provide additional information for future environmental flow rulemaking as well as expand knowledge on the ecosystems of the rivers and bays within our basin. The BBASC Work Plan is prioritized in three tiers, with the Tier 1 recommendations listed in specific priority order. Study efforts and activities listed in Tier 2 are presented as a higher priority than those items listed in Tier 3; however, within the two tiers the efforts are not prioritized. The BBASC preferred to present prioritization in this manner to highlight the studies and activities it identified as most important in the immediate term without discouraging potential sponsoring or funding entities interested in advancing efforts within the other tiers.
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A

    Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A

    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
  • Oyster Restoration Project in Galveston Bay and Sabine Lake 2014

    Oyster Restoration Project in Galveston Bay and Sabine Lake 2014

    Project aims to restore Galveston Bay oyster reefs by CHRISTOPHER SMITH GONZALEZ see http://www.dallasnews.com/news/state/headlines/20140527-project-aims-to-restore-galveston-bay-oyster- reefs.ece The Galveston County Daily News Published: 27 May 2014 06:00 PM GALVESTON — Floating just a couple of meters above an oyster reef in Galveston Bay, two scientists working to improve the reef sifted through rock and shell pulled up from the bottom. “I don’t see any spat,” said Bryan Legare, a natural resource specialist with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, as he looked for the small, immature oysters. “It might be a little early for spat since it’s been such a cold winter,” said colleague Bill Rodney, an oyster restoration biologist, as they looked over the pile of cultch — the hard material including rock, crushed limestone and shell that oysters attach to. The young oysters, or spat, will develop as the weather warms, but the pressing question is whether the right conditions will exist for them to grow to mature oysters, which then become part of a multimillion business and which fill an important ecological niche. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department is in the midst of the largest oyster reef restoration project it’s ever undertaken. It’s an effort to provide oysters with a hard surface they can grow on. The silt deposited in the bay by Hurricane Ike in 2008 and the ongoing drought have damaged oyster reefs in Galveston Bay. Not much can be done about the lack of rain, but the department is trying to do something to deal with the silt by depositing almost 80,000 tons of river rock, ranging from the size of a marble to a small brick, over Middle Reef, Pepper Grove Reef and Hannah’s Reef in East Bay and the large Sabine Reef in Sabine Lake.
  • Current Status and Historical Trends of Seagrass in the CCBNEP Study

    Current Status and Historical Trends of Seagrass in the CCBNEP Study

    Current Status and Historical Trends of Seagrass in the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program CCBNEP-20 • October 1997 This project has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #CE-9963-01-2 to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. The contents of this document do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, nor do the contents of this document necessarily constitute the views or policy of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Management Conference or its members. The information presented is intended to provide background information, including the professional opinion of the authors, for the Management Conference deliberations while drafting official policy in the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). The mention of trade names or commercial products does not in any way constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. Current Status and Historical Trends of Seagrasses in the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area Warren Pulich, Jr., Ph.D. Catherine Blair Coastal Studies Program Texas Parks & Wildlife Department 3000 IH 35 South Austin, Texas 78704 and William A. White The University of Texas at Austin Bureau of Economic Geology University Station Box X Austin, Texas 78713 Publication CCBNEP - 20 October 1997 Policy Committee Commissioner John Baker Mr. Jerry Clifford Policy Committee Chair Policy Committee Vice-Chair Texas Natural Resource Conservation Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6 Commission The Honorable Vilma Luna Commissioner Ray Clymer State Representative Texas Parks and Wildlife Department The Honorable Carlos Truan Commissioner Garry Mauro Texas Senator Texas General Land Office The Honorable Josephine Miller Commissioner Noe Fernandez County Judge, San Patricio County Texas Water Development Board The Honorable Loyd Neal Mr.
  • Houston-Galveston, Texas Managing Coastal Subsidence

    Houston-Galveston, Texas Managing Coastal Subsidence

    HOUSTON-GALVESTON, TEXAS Managing coastal subsidence TEXAS he greater Houston area, possibly more than any other Lake Livingston A N D S metropolitan area in the United States, has been adversely U P L L affected by land subsidence. Extensive subsidence, caused T A S T A mainly by ground-water pumping but also by oil and gas extraction, O C T r has increased the frequency of flooding, caused extensive damage to Subsidence study area i n i t y industrial and transportation infrastructure, motivated major in- R i v vestments in levees, reservoirs, and surface-water distribution facili- e S r D N ties, and caused substantial loss of wetland habitat. Lake Houston A L W O Although regional land subsidence is often subtle and difficult to L detect, there are localities in and near Houston where the effects are Houston quite evident. In this low-lying coastal environment, as much as 10 L Galveston feet of subsidence has shifted the position of the coastline and A Bay T changed the distribution of wetlands and aquatic vegetation. In fact, S A Texas City the San Jacinto Battleground State Historical Park, site of the battle O Galveston that won Texas independence, is now partly submerged. This park, C Gulf of Mexico about 20 miles east of downtown Houston on the shores of Galveston Bay, commemorates the April 21, 1836, victory of Texans 0 20 Miles led by Sam Houston over Mexican forces led by Santa Ana. About 0 20 Kilometers 100 acres of the park are now under water due to subsidence, and A road (below right) that provided access to the San Jacinto Monument was closed due to flood- ing caused by subsidence.
  • 07-77817-02 Final Report Dickinson Bayou

    07-77817-02 Final Report Dickinson Bayou

    Dickinson Bayou Watershed Protection Plan February 2009 Dickinson Bayou Watershed Partnership 1 PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY The preparation of this report was financed though grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................................. 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 10 SUMMARY OF MILESTONES ........................................................................................................................ 13 FORWARD ................................................................................................................................................... 17 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 The Dickinson Bayou Watershed ..................................................................................................................