DOCSLIB.ORG

Cedar Bayou Watershed Protection Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cedar Bayou Watershed Protection Plan Cedar Bayou Watershed Protection Plan Prepared for the Cedar Bayou Watershed Partnership by the Houston-Galveston Area Council 6/17/2016 The Development of a Watershed Protection Plan for Cedar Bayou project is partially funded by the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board through a Clean Water Act §319(h) grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Additional funding was provided by the Galveston Bay Estuary Program. Acknowledgements The Cedar Bayou Watershed Protection Plan is the culmination of the efforts of a diverse and committed group of stakeholders and local partners. This collaborative, community-based approach to protecting the public health, economy, and ecology of the Cedar Bayou area would not have been possible without their dedication and persistence. The Cedar Bayou Watershed Partnership wishes to sincerely thank the members of the project’s Steering Committee, past and present. These leaders from different backgrounds share a common commitment to their community. Steering Committee Members Mr. Andrew Allemand Mr. Jonathan Holley Commissioner Gary Nelson Ms. Charlene Bohanon Ms. Diane Jones Mr. Guido Persiani Mr. Royal D. Burnside Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Jones Mr. Joe Presnall Mr. Lewis Odell Casey Ms. Sharon Kamas Mr. Ladd Puskus Mr. Gil Chambers Ms. Wilyne Laughlin Mr. Glenn Sabadosa Ms. Danielle Cioce Mr. Jim Lard Commissioner Rusty Senac Mr. Bill Cobabe Ms. Alisa Max Mr. John Schrader Ms. Cindy Coker Councilman David McCartney Ms. Adele Warren Mr. Joshua Donaldson Ms. Jean McCloud Mr. David Fowler Mr. Lindy Murff Mr. Ryan Granata The support of an engaged group of local organizations is the backbone of this watershed effort. These partners have been integral to the development and guidance of this watershed protection plan. Local Partners Bayer Cedar Bayou Friends Liberty County Bayou Preservation Association Galveston Bay Estuary Program Lower Trinity Soil and Water Baytown Area CAP Galveston Bay Foundation Conservation District Cedar Bayou Navigation District Harris County Murff Turf Farms Chambers County Harris County Flood Control NRG Cedar Bayou generating City of Baytown District facility City of Mont Belvieu Harris County Soil and Water Trinity Bay Soil and Water City of Beach City Conservation District Conservation District Crosby ISD Houston-Galveston Area Council Environmental Health Specialties Huffman ISD Front Page photo credits, clockwise from top left: Justin Bower, Jerry Jones, Justin Bower, Jeff Murray, Justin Bower Members of regional, state and national agencies committed to local watershed initiatives have provided invaluable technical assistance and insight as a Technical Advisory Committee for the project. Technical Advisory Committee Texas Commission on Environmental Quality United States Geologic Survey United States Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston District Texas Farm Bureau Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Galveston Bay Estuary Program USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Texas Forest Service Texas A&M University AgriLife Extension and AgriLife Texas Department of State Health Services Research The Partnership would like to extend special thanks to Linda and Jerry Jones, Commissioners Rusty Senac and Gary Nelson, Kim Laird, Cynthia Clevenger, Charlene Bohanon and the Galveston Bay Foundation, Lisa Marshall, Jonathan Holley, Danielle Cioce, Sarah Bernhardt, Cindy Coker, Gerald Hayes, Brian Koch, Ashley Wendt, the Eddie V. Gray Wetlands Center, Mark Fleming and the Baytown Sun, and KSHN radio. This project exists because of the investment of funding and time from the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board (TSSWCB), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Galveston Bay Estuary Program (GBEP) of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Lastly, our gratitude goes out for every stakeholder who takes the time to attend a meeting, share their knowledge or help spread the word. Partnership watershed tour group, 2012 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Cedar Bayou has long been the lifeblood of the communities that sprang up along its banks. Its northern headwaters fuel a historic agricultural community, while its navigable southern reaches support thriving industrial, commercial and recreational economies. The prairie, wetlands, and forests through which it flows contain critical habitat and resources for the ecosystems of Galveston Bay and the Upper Texas Gulf Coast. Over the last several years, however, the ability of the waterway to support the human and aquatic communities that rely on it has degraded. In 2008, Cedar Bayou was designated by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality as having levels of fecal bacteria that posed a risk for contact recreation, and for being unable to fully support aquatic life. At the same time, fish consumption advisories in the Galveston Bay system raised public health concerns about elevated levels of PCBs and dioxins. In response to these and other concerns, a diverse group of local stakeholders formed the Cedar Bayou Watershed Partnership under the guidance of the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board and the Houston-Galveston Area Council. The primary goal of the Partnership was to develop a Watershed Protection Plan to restore and maintain water quality in Cedar Bayou and its tributaries. The purpose of the Cedar Bayou Watershed Protection Plan is to identify priority water quality issues, investigate their causes and sources, and recommend a comprehensive set of voluntary measures for addressing them based on sound science and local decision-making. The Plan originates from the local community and is designed to serve as a roadmap to achieving their goals of protecting the public health, economies, and ecosystems that depend on the health of Cedar Bayou. To ensure that it remains responsive and relevant to the changing needs of the Bayou and its local stakeholders, the Cedar Bayou Watershed Protection Plan is intended to be a living document. The Plan will be regularly evaluated to monitor its success and make revisions as needed. Its future implementation and evolution will be guided by an active and empowered local stakeholder group. TABLE OF CONTENTS Statement of Purpose ..................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary of the Cedar Bayou Watershed Protection Plan .............. 1 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 Watersheds .............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Watersheds and Water Quality ............................................................................................................................................... 5 The Case for Clean Water ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 The Watershed Approach ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 Watershed Protection Planning ............................................................................................................................................... 9 A Watershed Protection Plan for Cedar Bayou ...................................................................................................................... 10 2 – The Cedar Bayou Watershed ................................................................... 12 Physical and Natural Features ....................................................................... 12 Stream Segments of the Watershed ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Cedar Bayou Above Tidal (0902) ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Cedar Bayou Tidal (0901) ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Watershed Boundary ............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Subwatersheds ...................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Topography ............................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Soils ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 23 Climate ................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Ecoregions .............................................................................................................................................................................. 25 Wildlife and Habitat ..............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • San Jacinto Battleground and State Historical Park: a Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan
    Volume 2002 Article 3 2002 San Jacinto Battleground and State Historical Park: A Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan I. Waynne Cox Steve A. Tomka Raba Kistner, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Cox, I. Waynne and Tomka, Steve A. (2002) "San Jacinto Battleground and State Historical Park: A Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2002, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2002.1.3 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2002/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. San Jacinto Battleground and State Historical Park: A Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2002/iss1/3 San Jacinto Battleground State Historical Park A Historical Synthesis and Archaeological Management Plan by I.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LYNCHBURG VOLUNTEERS 1 2 3 by Trevia Wooster Beverly, Bernice Mistrot, and Mike Vance ©Baytown Historical Preservation Association4
    An Application for a Texas Historical Marker Presented to the Harris County Historical Commission – September 12, 2016 THE LYNCHBURG VOLUNTEERS 1 2 3 by Trevia Wooster Beverly, Bernice Mistrot, and Mike Vance ©Baytown Historical Preservation Association4 “The people of Texas do now constitute a free, sovereign and independent republic.”5 PREFACE6 From the colonial era until today, America has depended upon citizen soldiers in times of crisis requiring a military response. These men—and now women—set aside their personal and professional affairs to join or form military organizations. And, once the crisis was resolved, resumed their civilian occupations until they were again needed as soldiers. This was especially a characteristic of frontiersmen, one which they carried with them In the 1820’s and 1830’s as their line of settlement moved beyond the western border of the United States of America into the Spanish and then Mexican territory of Texas. I. CONTEXT 7 The area now known as Baytown was home to many who, arriving as early as 1822, would 8 9 become active in the struggle for Texas independence that culminated in 1836. Nathaniel Lynch, for whom the town of Lynchburg is named, arrived in Texas in the summer of 1822 with his wife and three children. On his one-league Mexican land grant, he established a trading post and a sawmill. 10 Together with Arthur McCormick, he operated the Lynchburg Ferry, which has been in continuous 11 12 operation since 1822. David Gouverneur Burnet brought a steam sawmill to the area in 1831. Midway Landing was not a town speculation, but the dock area on Black Duck Bay at the plantation 13 14 of William Scott, who had purchased the land from John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Bookletchart™ Houston Ship Channel – Alexander Island to Carpenters Bayou NOAA Chart 11329
    BookletChart™ Houston Ship Channel – Alexander Island to Carpenters Bayou NOAA Chart 11329 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the leads to Goose Creek. Private poles and markers may at times mark the preferred route. Goose Creek contains numerous oil wells, pipelines, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration pilings, and other hazards; local knowledge is advised. The creek is used National Ocean Service by oil well supply and commercial fishing vessels. Office of Coast Survey The highway bridge 2.8 miles above the entrance has a 48-foot fixed span with a clearance of 9 feet. Two highway and two railroad bridges www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov between the entrance and this bridge have fixed spans with a minimum 888-990-NOAA width of 32 feet and minimum clearance of 14 feet. Overhead power cables crossing the creek between the mouth and the highway bridge What are Nautical Charts? 2.8 miles above the entrance have a least clearance of 36 feet. Baytown, 4 miles above Morgans Point on the NE side of the channel, is Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show the site of the Exxon Company, U.S.A., refining facilities. water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much About 1.5 miles above the Baytown facilities, a privately maintained more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and channel leads in a SW direction from the main ship channel along the efficient navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Water Bottom Dropping Page 6 FISHING
    Doves usher in a new season * September 12, 2008 Texas’ Premier Outdoor Newspaper Volume 5, Issue 2 * Report on Page 6 www.lonestaroutdoornews.com INSIDE Flyway rivalry prompts HUNTING Texas’ dove research Timing of hunt causes stir among hunters BY CRAIG NYHUS on doves. A team was out two days prior to the hunting season to collect Dove hunters in Texas have long bird specimens for a study compar- feared a federal requirement for the ing the effectiveness of lead and non- use of nonlead shot to pursue their lead shot. But some outfitters and hunters were taken aback by the early Grayson County has become quarry. The state holds the same con- cerns, especially after other states in shooting. famous for its big bucks in the the Central Flyway tried to force Texas Parks and Wildlife biologists state’s lone archery-only Texas to require nonlead shot based are in the first year of a multi-year county. A petition to modify on their waterfowl studies, according study to determine the effectiveness the archery-only rule has many GUNNING FOR RESEARCH: Using volunteer hunters, TPW biologists are to officials. of different load types on wild hunters up in arms. conducting a three-year study of shot effectiveness on dove, but the early That was the genesis of Texas’ own mourning doves using trained Page 7 hunt caused a PR nightmare for officials. Photo by TPW. study on the effect of nonlead shot See DOVE, Page 16 Teal are arriving on schedule along the Texas coast in time for the early season.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3138, Sheet 15
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR In cooperation with the SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 3138 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY HARRIS-GALVESTON SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT, Location of borehole extensometer sites—SHEET 15 OF 16 CITY OF HOUSTON, Kasmarek, M.C., Johnson, M.R., and Ramage, J.K., 2010, Water-level altitudes 2010 and FORT BEND SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT, AND water-level changes in the Chicot, Evangeline, and Jasper aquifers and compaction LONE STAR GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1973–2009 in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers, Houston-Galveston region, Texas 95°30' 95°15' TEXAS 19 Study area 95°45' WALKER 45 COUNTY 30°45' 75 30°45' 190 WEST FORK LOCATION MAP SAN HUNTSVILLE 30 96° JACINTO 156 LAKE LIVINGSTON Lake 45 MONTGOMERY COUNTY 30 RIVER 95° GRIMES COUNTY 150 FM 1375 30°30' Creek SAN JACINTO COUNTY B R 30°30' A Z O 90 S C O 59 U LAKE N CONROE T Y Caney 787 105 FM 105 CONROE 1774 6 3 3 94°45' WEST op 105 State Lo 30°15' Lake 1488 Creek Creek FORK 146 30°15' 59 321 6 COUNTY SAN B JACINTO R A Z O S WALLER COUNTY HARRIS RIVER SPRING FM 1960 Creek 30° 290 249 45 HUMBLE 30° Spring LAKE TRINITY A U 146 E E HOUSTON S Sam Houston Pky T W N 94°30' I N LAKE HOUSTON R o N 61 I ALDINE r 90 V C t E h O R U BLJ-65-07-909 LIBERTY COUNTY N e T lt Y SHELDON CHAMBERS COUNTY 548 C RESERVOIR ed ar KATY 10 RIVER ADDICKS 610 90 Addicks Satsuma Rd NORTHEAST 10 LJ-65-12-726 CHANNELVIEW 10 LJ-65-14-746GALENA LJ-65-16-930(C-1) 65 29°45' PARK Buffalo BAYTOWN 99 BAYTOWN FORT BEND HOUSTON SOUTHWEST Bayou LJ-65-16-931(C-2) 29°45' COUNTY WEST UNIVERSITY B a LJ-65-21-226 LJ-65-23-322
    [Show full text]
  • Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee
    Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee May 25, 2012 Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, & Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, & San Antonio Bays Basin & Bay Area Stakeholders Committee (GSA BBASC) Work Plan for Adaptive Management Preliminary Scopes of Work May 25, 2012 May 10, 2012 The Honorable Troy Fraser, Co-Presiding Officer The Honorable Allan Ritter, Co-Presiding Officer Environmental Flows Advisory Group (EFAG) Mr. Zak Covar, Executive Director Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Dear Chairman Fraser, Chairman Ritter and Mr. Covar: Please accept this submittal of the Work Plan for Adaptive Management (Work Plan) from the Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee (BBASC). The BBASC has offered a comprehensive list of study efforts and activities that will provide additional information for future environmental flow rulemaking as well as expand knowledge on the ecosystems of the rivers and bays within our basin. The BBASC Work Plan is prioritized in three tiers, with the Tier 1 recommendations listed in specific priority order. Study efforts and activities listed in Tier 2 are presented as a higher priority than those items listed in Tier 3; however, within the two tiers the efforts are not prioritized. The BBASC preferred to present prioritization in this manner to highlight the studies and activities it identified as most important in the immediate term without discouraging potential sponsoring or funding entities interested in advancing efforts within the other tiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity Bay-Upper Galveston Bay RC 2006
    Characterization of Potential Adverse Health Effects Associated with Consuming Fish or Blue Crab from Trinity Bay and Upper Galveston Bay Chambers, Galveston, and Harris Counties, Texas April 2008 Department of State Health Services Division for Regulatory Services Policy, Standards, and Quality Assurance Unit Seafood and Aquatic Life Group Trinity Bay-Upper Galveston Bay RC 2006 INTRODUCTION Description of the Galveston Bay System Galveston Bay, the largest estuary on the Texas coast (600 square miles or 384,000 acres; 232 miles of shoreline) and the seventh largest in the United States, is a shallow bar-built estuary in a drowned river delta.1 The average depth of the bay is 7 feet, the maximum non-dredged depth approximately 10 feet.2 Galveston Bay is composed of four major sub-bays: Galveston Bay, Trinity Bay, East Bay, and West Bay. 3 The Galveston Bay watershed encompasses approximately 33,000 square miles comprised of three main drainages: the Trinity River watershed, the San Jacinto River watershed, and the coastal bayou watershed. The Trinity River basin provides about 51% of the freshwater inflow into Galveston Bay.3 The Galveston Bay watershed includes all or portions of 44 Texas counties; five counties surround the estuary: Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Liberty. The watershed also includes the two largest metropolitan areas in Texas: Houston and Dallas–Fort Worth.2 To lend perspective to the size of this watershed, note that the city of Houston lies approximately 250 miles south-southeast of Dallas-Fort Worth. Galveston Bay, Texas’ largest fishery resource, contributes approximately one third of the state=s commercial fishing income.4 Commercial and recreational fishing on Galveston Bay generates over one billion dollars per year; over one-half of the state=s expenditures for recreational fishing go directly or indirectly to Galveston Bay.4 The areas around the Galveston Bay system are also home to one of the nation’s largest petrochemical and industrial complexes5.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Bay a Characterization of the Galveston Bay Ecosystem
    The State of the Bay A characterization of the Galveston Bay Ecosystem Third Edition A publication of the Galveston Bay Estuary Program The State of the Bay A characterization of the Galveston Bay Ecosystem Third Edition A publication of the Galveston Bay Estuary Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Edited by L. James Lester and L. A. Gonzalez Houston Advanced Research Center 4800 Research Forest Drive The Woodlands, TX 77381 Contributing Authors Alecya Gallaway, UHCL Environmental Institute of Houston (Chapter 3) · John B. Anderson, Rice University (Chapter 5) · Priscilla Weeks, HARC (The Decline of the Fishing Village) December 2011 Front cover illustration: © 2009 iStockPhoto.com Brandon Laufenberg Back cover (clockwise from top right): © 2006 iStockPhoto.com Dave Huss · © 2010 Jarrett Woodrow · © 2010 Jarrett Woodrow · © 2005 iStockPhoto.com Paul Wolf · © 2008 iStockPhoto.com Aaron Frankel The preparation of this report was financed through grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The TCEQ is an equal opportunity employer. The agency does not allow discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation or veteran status. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this document may be requested in alternate formats by contacting the TCEQ at 512-239-0028, Fax 512-239-4488, or 1-800-RELAY-TX (TDD), or by writing PO Box 13087, Austin, TX 78711-3087. The entire Galveston Bay watershed encompasses more than 27,000 square miles and 12 million people, nearly half of the state’s population. The Galveston Bay watershed extends up the Trinity River to the cities of Dallas and Fort Worth (left).
    [Show full text]
  • Living Shoreline at Trinity Bay Discovery Center Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Living Shoreline at Trinity Bay Discovery Center TCEQ Contract # 582-18-80340 August 30, 2019 Prepared for: Galveston Bay Estuary Program 17041 El Camino Real, Suite 210 Houston, TX 77058 Prepared by: Galveston Bay Foundation 1100 Hercules Ave, Suite 200 Houston, TX 77058 Final Report August 30, 2019 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Trinity Bay Discovery Center (TBDC) Living Shoreline project aimed to protect the shoreline of the TBDC property from erosion and restore fringing estuarine marsh habitat. Owned by the Galveston Bay Foundation (GBF), TBDC is a 17-acre conservation and education property located on the northwest shoreline of Trinity Bay in Chambers County, Texas. Trinity Bay is a high wave energy environment, particularly in the immediate area of the project. The project is located along approximately 880 feet of eroding shoreline. Wind-driven waves have impaired the twenty- year-old bulkhead, installed by previous landowners, resulting in severe shoreline erosion as well as vegetation and soil losses. GBF and project partners developed the TBDC Living Shoreline project to reduce wave energy impacting the shoreline, halt erosion of the shoreline, and promote deposition of suspended sediments landward of the structure. After acquiring the necessary permits and competitively bidding the project, GBF oversaw the construction of the 780-foot rip-rap breakwater which protects 540 feet of shoreline. In addition, GBF worked with volunteer groups to construct 400 linear feet of oyster shell breakwater along the northeastern shoreline which receives the lowest amount of wave action. The breakwater structures created approximately two-acres of calm water habitat that will allow for the re-establishment of intertidal marsh.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    LITERATURE CITED Chapter 1 Texas Senate. 1999. SB 1690: Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Act. 76th Texas Legislature. ABWP. 2003. Armand Bayou watershed plan. Houston, Texas: Armand Bayou Watershed Partnership, Texas Coastal Watershed Program, Texas Sea Grant. Basnyat, P., L. D. Teeter, K. M. Flynn, and B. G. Lockaby. 1999. "Relationships between landscape characteristics and nonpoint source pollution inputs to coastal estuaries." Environmental Management no. 23 (4):539-549. Batchelor, M.E., and C.G. Guthrie. 2008. Galveston Bay freshwater inflow re-study: an investigation of productivity inflow relationships. Austin, Texas: Texas Water Development Board BCGCD. 2005. Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation District fact sheet: October 2005. Angleton, Texas. Biggs, H., and A. Gallaway. 2007. Habitat conservation blueprint: a plan to save the habitats and heritage of Galveston Bay; sites strategies and resources. Houston, Texas: Environmental Institute of Houston, University of Houston-Clear Lake. Buzan, D., W. Lee, J. Culbertson, N. Kuhn, and L. Robinson. 2009. "Positive relationship between freshwater inflow and oyster abundance in Galveston Bay, Texas." Estuaries and Coasts no. 32 (1):206-212. Calnan, T.R. 1995. A coastal wetlands acquisition plan for Texas. Project report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Wetlands Protection State Development. Austin, Texas: Texas General Land Office. Correa, O., L. Raun, H. Rifai, M. Suarez, T. Holsen, and L. Koenig. 2006. "Depositional flux of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in an urban setting." Chemosphere no. 64 (9):1550-1561. Correa, O., H. Rifai, L. Raun, M. Suarez, and L. Koenig. 2004. "Concentrations and vapor-particle partitioning of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in ambient air of Houston, TX." Atmospheric Environment no.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comments on the 2019 RESTORE Council Planning
    RESTORE Council Planning Framework Draft Public Comment Correspondences Comment Period: April 26 - June 19, 2019 1. Comments Received During Webinars ......................................................................................... 3 1a. Georgia Ackerman, Apalachicola Riverkeeper.............................................................................................................. 3 1b. Sally Bakko, City of Galveston ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1c. Jessica Bibza, National Wildlife Federation ................................................................................................................... 3 1d. Darryl Boudreau ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 1e. Janet Bowman The Nature Conservancy ...................................................................................................................... 3 1f. Jackie Cole, Galveston City Council .............................................................................................................................. 3 1g. Jim Muller, Bay County Board of County Commissioners ............................................................................................ 3 1h. Adrienne Ruhl ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2 State of the Double Bayou Watershed
    2 State of the Double Bayou Watershed 2.1 Double Bayou Watershed Overview 2.1.1 Double Bayou landscape The Double Bayou watershed is located on the Upper Texas Gulf Coast and is part of the Galveston Bay watershed (Figure 2-1 Double Bayou watershed). Situated in the eastern portion of the Lower Galveston Bay, it is comprised of two main subwatersheds: East Fork and West Fork, which are also the primary waterways in the watershed. The Double Bayou watershed drains directly into the Trinity Bay system and ultimately into Galveston Bay. The majority (93%) of the watershed lies within Chambers County, Texas. The remaining 7% of the watershed is located in Liberty County, Texas. The Double Bayou watershed drains 98 square miles (61,445 acres) of predominantly rural and agricultural landscape. However, several residential centers are located in the watershed. Figure 2-1 Double Bayou watershed 1 The City of Anahuac, Texas is located on the Trinity River and the northeast bank of Trinity Bay. This rural community is the largest contiguous area of developed land in the watershed. Anahuac has a total area of 1,344 acres (2.1 square miles) and is nine feet above sea level (District 2013). Anahuac is the Chambers County seat, with a 2010 population of 2,243. Much of the middle portion of Chambers county drains into Double Bayou. The unincorporated community of Oak Island is identified by the U.S. Census as a designated place. Oak Island is located at the confluence of the East and West Forks of Double Bayou and Trinity Bay.
    [Show full text]