DOCSLIB.ORG

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Service-Level Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Service-Level Draft Appendix K Archaeological Sites Technical Study In coordination with Oklahoma DOT Archaeological Sites Technical Study Prepared by July 2016 Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................................... v 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Service Type Descriptions .............................................................................................. 1-4 1.1.1 Conventional Rail .......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.1.2 Higher-Speed Rail ......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.1.3 High-Speed Rail ............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2 Alternative Descriptions ................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.1 No Build Alternative ...................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.2 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth ....................................... 1-6 1.2.3 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio ............................................. 1-7 1.2.4 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas .......................................................... 1-8 1.2.5 Station Cities ................................................................................................................. 1-9 2.0 Regulatory Requirements ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Federal Laws, Regulations, and Executive Orders ...................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 State Laws and Regulations ........................................................................................ 2-2 3.0 Evaluation Methods ................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Data Sources ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3 NRHP Significance Criteria ............................................................................................. 3-2 3.4 Service-Level Analysis ..................................................................................................... 3-2 4.0 Baseline/Affected Environment .............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 EIS Study Area ................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Brief Prehistoric Cultural Background of Region .......................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth ....................................... 4-2 4.2.2 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio ........................................... 4-11 4.2.3 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas ........................................................ 4-14 4.3 Archaeological Sites ..................................................................................................... 4-17 5.0 Effects on Archaeological Sites ............................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 No Build Alternative ........................................................................................................ 5-3 5.2 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth ......................................... 5-3 5.2.1 Alternative N4A Conventional Rail ............................................................................... 5-3 5.3 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio ............................................... 5-4 5.3.1 Alternative C4A Higher-Speed Rail .............................................................................. 5-4 5.3.2 Alternative C4A High-Speed Rail .................................................................................. 5-5 5.3.3 Alternative C4B Higher-Speed Rail .............................................................................. 5-6 5.3.4 Alternative C4B High-Speed Rail .................................................................................. 5-6 5.3.5 Alternative C4C Higher-Speed Rail .............................................................................. 5-7 5.3.6 Alternative C4C High-Speed Rail .................................................................................. 5-8 Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study July 2016 Archaeological Sites Technical Study Page iii TBG111814093418SCO Contents 5.4 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas ............................................................ 5-9 5.4.1 Alternative S4 Higher-Speed Rail ................................................................................. 5-9 5.4.2 Alternative S6 Higher-Speed Rail ............................................................................... 5-10 5.4.3 Alternative S6 High-Speed Rail .................................................................................. 5-10 6.0 Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Strategies .............................................................. 6-1 7.0 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 7-1 8.0 References ............................................................................................................................... 8-1 9.0 Preparers .................................................................................................................................. 9-1 List of Figures 1-1: Build Alternatives ............................................................................................................................ 1-2 4-1: Index Map ..................................................................................................................................... 4-26 4-2: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 1 ................................... 4-27 4-3: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 2 ................................... 4-28 4-4: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 3 ................................... 4-29 4-5: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 4 ................................... 4-30 4-6: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 5 ................................... 4-31 4-7: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 6 ................................... 4-32 4-8: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 7 ................................... 4-33 4-9: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 8 ................................... 4-34 4-10: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 9 ................................. 4-35 4-11: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 10 .............................. 4-36 4-12: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 11 .............................. 4-37 4-13: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 12 .............................. 4-38 List of Tables 1-1: Alternatives Carried Forward for Further Evaluation .................................................................... 1-3 1-2: Cities with Potential Stations ....................................................................................................... 1-10 4-1: Prehistoric Archaeological Site Types by Natural Region ............................................................. 4-1 4-2: Archaeological Sites in Oklahoma—Northern Section (presented north to south and west to east) .......................................................................................................................... 4-18 4-3: Archaeological Sites in Texas—Northern Section (presented north to south and west to east) ................................................................................................................................. 4-19 4-4: Archaeological Sites—Central Section (presented north to south, and west to east) ............. 4-20 4-5: Archaeological Sites—Southern Section (Alternatives S4 and S6 presented north to south and west to east) ............................................................................................................... 4-24 5-1: Summary of Archaeological Sites by Geographic Section ............................................................ 5-1 5-2: Summary of Archaeological Sites by Alternative ........................................................................... 5-1 7-1: Summary of Potential Intensity of Effects on Archaeological Sites ............................................. 7-2 Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study July 2016 Archaeological Sites Technical Study Page iv TBG111814093418SCO Abbreviations and Acronyms APE Area of Potential Effect CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 307: Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (4/9/2008)
    Revisions to §307 - Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (updated November 12, 2009) EPA has not approved the revised definition of “surface water in the state” in the TX WQS, which includes an area out 10.36 miles into the Gulf of Mexico. Under the CWA, Texas does not have jurisdiction to regulate water standards more than three miles from the coast. Therefore, EPA’s approval of the items in the enclosure recognizes the state’s authority under the CWA out to three miles in the Gulf of Mexico, but does not extend past that point. Beyond three miles, EPA retains authority for CWA purposes EPA’s approval also does not include the application the TX WQS for the portions of the Red River and Lake Texoma that are located within the state of Oklahoma. Finally, EPA is not approving the TX WQS for those waters or portions of waters located in Indian Country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. The following sections have been approved by EPA and are therefore effective for CWA purposes: • §307.1. General Policy Statement • §307.2. Description of Standards • §307.3. Definitions and Abbreviations (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.4. General Criteria • §307.5. Antidegradation • §307.6. Toxic Materials. (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.7. Site-specific Uses and Criteria (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.8. Application of Standards • §307.9. Determination of Standards Attainment • Appendix C - Segment Descriptions • Appendix D - Site-specific Receiving Water Assessments The following sections have been partially approved by EPA: • Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention Grade 7
    Texas Historical Commission Washington-on-the-Brazos A Texas Convention Grade 7 Virtual Field Trip visitwashingtononthebrazos.com Learning Guide Grade 7 Childhood in the Republic Overview: A New Beginning for Texas Texas became Mexican territory in 1821 and the new settlers brought by Stephen F. Austin and others were considered Mexican citizens. The distance between the settlements and Mexico (proper), plus the increasing number of settlers moving into the territory caused tension. The settlers had little influence in their government and limited exposure to Mexican culture. By the time of the Convention of 1836, fighting had already Image “Reading of the Texas Declaration of broken out in some areas. The causes of some of this Independence,” Courtesy of Artie Fultz Davis Estate; Artist: Charles and Fanny Norman, June 1936 fighting were listed as grievances in the Texas Declaration of Independence. Objectives • Identify the key grievances given by the people of Texas that lead to the formation of government in the independent Republic of Texas • How do they compare to the grievances of the American Revolution? • How do they relate to the Mexican complaints against Texas? • How did these grievances lead to the formation of government in the Republic? • Identify the key persons at the Convention of 1836 Social Studies TEKS 4th Grade: 4.3A, 4.13A 7th Grade: 7.1 B, 7.2 D, 7.3C Resources • Activity 1: 59 for Freedom activity resources • Activity 2: Declaration and Constitution Causes and Effects activity resources • Extension Activity: Order
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed Fastrill Reservoir in East Texas: a Study Using
    THE PROPOSED FASTRILL RESERVOIR IN EAST TEXAS: A STUDY USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS Michael Ray Wilson, B.S. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2009 APPROVED: Paul Hudak, Major Professor and Chair of the Department of Geography Samuel F. Atkinson, Minor Professor Pinliang Dong, Committee Member Michael Monticino, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Wilson, Michael Ray. The Proposed Fastrill Reservoir in East Texas: A Study Using Geographic Information Systems. Master of Science (Applied Geography), December 2009, 116 pp., 26 tables, 14 illustrations, references, 34 titles. Geographic information systems and remote sensing software were used to analyze data to determine the area and volume of the proposed Fastrill Reservoir, and to examine seven alternatives. The controversial reservoir site is in the same location as a nascent wildlife refuge. Six general land cover types impacted by the reservoir were also quantified using Landsat imagery. The study found that water consumption in Dallas is high, but if consumption rates are reduced to that of similar Texas cities, the reservoir is likely unnecessary. The reservoir and its alternatives were modeled in a GIS by selecting sites and intersecting horizontal water surfaces with terrain data to create a series of reservoir footprints and volumetric measurements. These were then compared with a classified satellite imagery to quantify land cover types. The reservoir impacted the most ecologically sensitive land cover type the most. Only one alternative site appeared slightly less environmentally damaging. Copyright 2009 by Michael Ray Wilson ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge my thesis committee members, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture, Recreation and Tourism
    Interim Report to the 85th Texas Legislature House Committee on Culture, Recreation & Tourism January 2017 HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE, RECREATION, & TOURISM TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTERIM REPORT 2016 A REPORT TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 85TH TEXAS LEGISLATURE RYAN GUILLEN CHAIRMAN COMMITTEE CLERK BEN WRIGHT Committee On Culture, Recreation, & Tourism JanuaryJanuary 10,4, 2017 2017 Ryan Guillen P.O. Box 2910 Chairman Austin, Texas 78768-2910 The Honorable Joe Straus Speaker, Texas House of Representatives Members of the Texas House of Representatives Texas State Capitol, Rm. 2W.13 Austin, Texas 78701 Dear Mr. Speaker and Fellow Members: The Committee on Culture, Recreation, & Tourism of the Eighty-fourth Legislature hereby submits its interim report including recommendations and drafted legislation for consideration by the Eighty-fifth Legislature. Respectfully submitted, _______________________ Ryan Guillen _______________________ _______________________ Dawnna Dukes, Vice Chair John Frullo _______________________ _______________________ Lyle Larson Marisa Márquez _______________________ _______________________ Andrew Murr Wayne Smith Dawnna Dukes Vice-Chairman Members: John Frullo, Lyle Larson, Marisa Márquez, Andrew Murr, Wayne Smith TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6 CULTURE, RECREATION, & TOURISM ................................................................................... 7 Interim Charge #1 ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Water Resources Institute
    Texas Water Resources Institute Summer 1989 Volume 15 No. 2 Optimizing Reservoir Management New Strategies Including Systems Operation and Reallocation May Boost Reservoir Yields By Ric Jensen Information Specialist, TWRI Many experts believe Texas can increase its surface water supplies without building new dams and reservoirs. The answer isn't magic. The solution is better management and coordination of existing reservoirs. New strategies/hat make every drop of water count include operating a group of reservoirs as a coordinated system; converting some reservoir storage space from hydropower production, flood control, and navigation to water supplies; and timing water levels in reservoirs to correspond to seasonal differences in streamflows and water demands. Scientists are learning more about the quality of water in lakes and how man's activities affect the chemical makeup of reservoirs. A number of important developments are already taking place. Both the City of Dallas and the Brazos River Authority manage their reservoir systems so that releases of water are tied to climate conditions water demands. The Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) has recently submitted a management plan to the Texas Water Commission (TWC) that could allow LCRA to sell "interruptible water supplies" during wet years. Opportunities to reallocate storage space in Texas reservoirs have been summarized in recent report by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Otherstudies have described how systems operation could increase water supplies in reservoirs in the Sabine, Trinity, and Trinity-San Jacinto River basins. 1 Optimizing reservoir management has been the focus of many university research projects. Scientists at Texas A&M University have been studying the Brazos River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Weird City: Sense of Place and Creative Resistance in Austin, Texas
    Weird City: Sense of Place and Creative Resistance in Austin, Texas BY Joshua Long 2008 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geography and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Human Geography __________________________________ Dr. Garth Andrew Myers, Chairperson __________________________________ Dr. Jane Gibson __________________________________ Dr. Brent Metz __________________________________ Dr. J. Christopher Brown __________________________________ Dr. Shannon O’Lear Date Defended: June 5, 2008. The Dissertation Committee for Joshua Long certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Weird City: Sense of Place and Creative Resistance in Austin, Texas ___________________________________ Dr. Garth Andrew Myers, Chairperson Date Approved: June 10, 2008 ii Acknowledgments This page does not begin to represent the number of people who helped with this dissertation, but there are a few who must be recognized for their contributions. Red, this dissertation might have never materialized if you hadn’t answered a random email from a KU graduate student. Thank you for all your help and continuing advice. Eddie, you revealed pieces of Austin that I had only read about in books. Thank you. Betty, thank you for providing such a fair-minded perspective on city planning in Austin. It is easy to see why so many Austinites respect you. Richard, thank you for answering all my emails. Seriously, when do you sleep? Ricky, thanks for providing a great place to crash and for being a great guide. Mycha, thanks for all the insider info and for introducing me to RARE and Mean-Eyed Chris.
    [Show full text]
  • ^ Y K' a " " Wfc Yy E Ti V'
    & " Wfc yy E 41 F N y o'1' I L B I ^ Y k' a " ti v' THE TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION MEDALLI(*N SUMMER 2017 ISSN 0890-7595 Vol. 55, No. III thc.texas.gov [email protected] TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION John L. Nau, Ill Chairman John W. Crain Vice Chairman Gilbert E. "Pete" Peterson Secretary Earl Broussard, Jr. Tom Perini Monica Burdette Robert K. Shepard Wallace B. Jefferson Daisy Sloan White Catherine McKnight Mark Wolfe FXP('Icti\/P Director Medalion STAFF Chris Florance Division Director Andy Rhodes Managing Editor Judy Jensen Sr. Graphic Design Coordinator thc.texas.gov Real places telling the real stories of Texas texastimetravel.com The Texas Heritage Trails Program's travel resnurre texashistoricsites.com The THC's 21 state historic properties thcfriends.org Friends of the Texas Historical Commissinn DE rcJTube @ Fast Facts These numbers show the significant economic impact of annual travel and heritage-related spending in Texas. C Source: Economic Impact of Historic Preservation in Texas, 2015 $58.4 $2.25 54,0 BILLION IN DIRECT BILLION IN HEPITAgr TIJRISM JOBS CREATED VISITOR SPENDING VIA HERITAGE TRAVEL 2 THE MEDALLION SUMMER 2017 TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Dear Friends, Now that the 85th Texas Legislature's regular session has I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that we will also be wrapped up, I'd like to share the impact it will have on making some challenging financial-planning decisions our agency and our valuable preservation partners across due to a budget reduction imposed on all state agencies. the state. We will continue to prioritize our efforts to efficiently invest in the historic buildings and cultural landscapes The Texas Historical Commission fared well during the that have defined Texas' special sense of place for centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Take Area Sublease Program
    Town of Sunnyvale, Texas Lake Ray Hubbard Take Area TAKE AREA SUBLEASE PROGRAM Program Outline I. Lake Ray Hubbard Take Area Defined II. Take Area Lease Program Authority III. Municipal Regulation in the Take Area IV. Purpose of the Residential Sublease Program V. Authority of Sublease Program Administration VI. Eligibility of Properties for Sublease VII. Subleased Take Area VIII. Non-Subleased Take Area IX. Non-Conforming Land Uses within the Take Area X. Survey of Take Area Sublease Boundaries XI. Take Area Sublease Boundaries XII. Sublease Area Side Boundary - Dispute Resolution XIII. Permit Requirements for Improvements in the Take Area XIV. Residential Sublease Area Improvement Permit Requirements XV. Establishing Sublease Rates I. Lake Ray Hubbard Take Area Defined The City of Dallas built and owns Lake Ray Hubbard. The City of Dallas incorporated the lake into the City of Dallas corporate limits and maintains the lake as a reservoir. The Take Line is defined as the perimeter boundary of Dallas’ property and Dallas’ corporate limits. The Take Line is commonly the rear property line of an adjacent property-owner’s property. The Take Area is defined as the land owned by the City of Dallas between the Take Line and the normal lake pool elevation of 435.5 mean sea level. II. Take Area Lease Program Authority The Town of Sunnyvale and the City of Dallas entered into an Interlocal Agreement and Lease on September 13, 2017, providing for the lease of the Take Area from the City of Dallas to the Town of Sunnyvale and the subsequent sublease of certain portions of the Take Area to adjacent residential property owners.
    [Show full text]
  • The People, Economy and Political Culture of Texas Part II
    For all its enormous range of space, climate and physical appearance, and for all the internal squabbles, contentions and strivings, Texas has a tight cohesiveness perhaps stronger than any other section of America. John Steinbeck gross state product (GSP): the total value of goods and services produced in a state in a year ... often simply referred to as GDP (gross domestic product), the term for national economies In 2016, the Texas GSP was $1.62 trillion. The Texas economy has been growing at a more rapid pace than the national economy. Texas’ GSP increased by an average of 3.7% annually between 2005 and 2015, nearly three times the US annual growth rate of 1.3%. Only North Dakota had greater economic growth during this period. One of the only things holding Texas back is the education rate among its labor supply. 1999-2011 Texas is the 10th largest economy in the world based on GDP. It is also an economy in transition. For most of Texas’s history, the state’s economy was based on the sale of agricultural commodities and raw materials. In the 19th century, cotton and cattle formed the basis of economic activity, and both are still important industries today. Texas has the most farms and the highest acreage in the US. It is ranked #1 for revenue generated from total livestock and livestock products. It is ranked #2 (behind California) for total agricultural revenue. Beef cattle production represents the largest single segment of Texas agriculture (56.7%), followed by cotton (14.6%). Ever since the discovery of oil, energy has been a dominant force politically and economically in Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Plan
    Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................6 Natural History Collection ............................................................................................................8 Collection Overview ....................................................................................................................8 Size ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 History of Collection ............................................................................................................................ 8 Types of Material .................................................................................................................................. 9 Required Permits ................................................................................................................................. 10 Collection Guidelines .................................................................................................................10 Associated Staff ..........................................................................................................................10 Paleontology & Geology Collection ............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity-River-RC-2012-2013.Pdf
    Characterization of Potential Adverse Health Effects Associated with � Consuming Fish from the � Trinity River � Anderson, Freestone, Henderson, Houston, Leon, Liberty, Madison, Navarro, � Polk, San Jacinto, Trinity, and Walker Counties, Texas � 2015 Department of State Health Services � Division for Regulatory Services � Policy, Standards, and Quality Assurance Unit � Seafood and Aquatic Life Group � Austin, Texas � INTRODUCTION � This document summarizes the results of a survey of the Lower Trinity River Basin –including the Trinity River above Lake Livingston and the Trinity River below Lake Livingston– conducted in 2012–2013 by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Seafood and Aquatic Life Group (SALG).a The SALG did this study to investigate potential polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and/or dibenzofurans (PCDDs/PCDFs) fish tissue contamination in the Lower Trinity River Basin and Lake Livingston. Previous studies of the Upper Trinity River Basin within the Dallas Fort Worth metropolitan area indicated the need to complete a comprehensive survey of the entire Trinity River Basin. The present study, ensuing from surveys of the Upper Trinity River Basin, examined fish from the Trinity River at U.S. Highway 287 downstream to U.S. Highway 90 including Lake Livingston for the presence and concentrations of environmental toxicants that, if eaten, potentially could affect human health negatively. The report addresses the public health implications of consuming fish from the Trinity River and suggests actions to reduce potential adverse health outcomes. History of the Upper Trinity River Basin Fish Consumption Advisory From 1990–2010, portions of the Clear Fork Trinity River, West Fork Trinity River, and the Upper Trinity River in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area (from the Seventh Street Bridge in Fort Worth downstream to the Interstate Highway (IH) 20 Bridge southeast of Dallas have been closed to the harvesting of fish.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of College Football Culture Inside the Neoliberal University Neal Ternes
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2014 Football School: An Analysis of College Football Culture inside the Neoliberal University Neal Ternes Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION FOOTBALL SCHOOL: AN ANALYSIS OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL CULTURE INSIDE THE NEOLIBERAL UNIVERSITY By NEAL TERNES A Thesis submitted to the Department of Sports Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2014 Neal Ternes defended this thesis on April 3, 2014. The members of the supervisory committee were: Michael Giardina Professor Directing Thesis Joshua Newman Committee Member Jeffery James Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii I dedicate this to my parents, Tim and Kathy Ternes, who have given me profound support and encouragement throughout my academic career. I love you both very much. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ vi Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... xii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]