Release Notes for NBAR2 Protocol Pack 37.0.0 for Cisco Wireless Controllers
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Akamai Accelerated Network Program FAQ Akamai Accelerated Network Program Frequently Asked Questions
Akamai Accelerated Network Program FAQ Akamai Accelerated Network Program Frequently Asked Questions Thank you for your interest in the Akamai Accelerated Network What security is there on your boxes? Program. To ensure that you have all your preliminary questions Akamai zealously guards the integrity of our servers. Of course, answered, please review this document. Your Akamai representative we cannot list the steps taken to secure the boxes, but we do have is also available to add more detail or answer additional over 6,000 servers installed in ISPs all over the world, and not one questions that may not be covered. It’s not too late to Accelerate has ever been remotely compromised. Standard security measures Your Network. are taken, such as disabling telnet access, using SSH, turning off daemons not used in production, etc. Server Installation Do you servers work behind a firewall? What do my engineers have to do during the installation? The servers are serving content just as the origin servers – Yahoo!, We ask our partners to simply install the hardware (rack mounted CNN, ESPN, Apple, etc. – would be. The origin servers are not computers and ethernet switches), connect them with the cables behind your firewall, and our servers work best if they are not provided, and finally to assign each computer an IP address and behind your firewall. default gateway. After installation what maintenance and support is Network required? Can we put servers from other content distributors in our The partner is not required to perform any regular maintenance network as well? on Akamai’s equipment. -
Legislators of Cyberspace: an Analysis of the Role Of
SHAPING CODE Jay P. Kesan* & Rajiv C. Shah** I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 4 II. THE CASE STUDIES: THE DEVELOPMENT OF CODE WITHIN INSTITUTIONS.............................. 13 A. World Wide Web......................................................................................................... 14 1. Libwww............................................................................................................ 14 2. NCSA Mosaic .................................................................................................. 16 B. Cookies ........................................................................................................................ 21 1. Netscape’s Cookies .......................................................................................... 21 2. The IETF’s Standard for Cookies .................................................................... 24 C. Platform for Internet Content Selection....................................................................... 28 D. Apache......................................................................................................................... 34 III. LEGISLATIVE BODIES: SOCIETAL INSTITUTIONS THAT DEVELOP CODE ................................. 37 A. Universities.................................................................................................................. 38 B. Firms........................................................................................................................... -
Akamai 2019 State of the Internet / Security Phishing
Akamai Security Research: Cybercriminals Using Enterprise-Based Strategies For Phishing Kit Development And Deployment Oct 30, 2019 09:49 CET Akamai 2019 State of the Internet / Security Phishing Akamai Security Research: Cybercriminals Using Enterprise- Based Strategies For Phishing Kit Development And Deployment Malicious Actors Developing Custom Tools and Processes to Target and Leverage the World’s Largest Tech Brands and Victimize Their Users Cambridge, MA -- October 30, 2019 -- Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) today published the Akamai 2019 State of the Internet / Security Phishing: Baiting the Hook report. The research findings indicate that cybercriminals are using enterprise-based development and deployment strategies, such as phishing as a service (PaaS), to leverage some of the world’s largest tech brands, with 42.63% of domains observed targeting Microsoft, PayPal, DHL, and Dropbox. The report details that phishing is no longer just an email-based threat, but has expanded to include social media and mobile devices, creating a wide- reaching problem that touches all industries. This evolving method continues to morph into different techniques, one of which being business email compromise (BEC) attacks. According to the FBI, BEC attacks resulted in worldwide losses of more than $12 billionbetween October 2013 and May 2018. “Phishing is a long-term problem that we expect will have adversaries continuously going after consumers and businesses alike until personalized awareness training programs and layered defense techniques are put in place,” said Martin McKeay, Editorial Director of the State of the Internet/Security report for Akamai. The report shows that cybercriminals are targeting top global brands and their users across various industries through highly-organized and sophisticated phishing kit operations. -
Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant Akamai Technologies, Inc
I]1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIJllJIfllIIIJJIIIttIHJillIJllllIJlllIlJJJFIIflMMIIJillIlJJIIIJ USFC2009-1372-10 {466256B 1-3FB1-4D3A-A6D4-9850D2 B04CA5 } {117249}{54-110705:110649}{062011} APPELLANT'S BRIEF 2009-1372,-1380,-1416,-1417 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff-Appellant, V° LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. App_l's_from"_" __ the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in case nos. 06-CV-11109 and 06-CV-11585, Judge Rya W. Zobel. PRINCIPAL BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ON REHEARING EN BANC Of Counsel: DONALD R. DUNNER KARA F. STOLL ROBERT S, FRANK, JR, FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, CHOATE, HALL&STEWARTLLP GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Two lntem_ionalPlace 901 New York Avenue, NW Boston, MA02110 Washington, DC 20001-4413 (202) 408-4000 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellant The Massachusetts Institute of Technology JENNIFER S. SWAN F1NNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETr & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203 (650) 849-6676 Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant June 20, 2011 Akamai Technologies, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST Counsel for Akamai Technologies, Inc. certifies the following: 1. The full name of every party or amicus represented by Counsel is: Akamai Technologies, Inc. 2. The name of the real party in interest represented by me is: None ° All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10 percent or more of the stock of the party represented by me are: None o The names of all law finns and the partners or associates that appeared for the party or amicus now represented by me in the trial court or agency or are expected to appear in this Court are: Donald R. -
Reseller Approved Manufacturer(S)
Reseller Approved Manufacturer(s) 1Plus1 Technology EMC 5X Technology Red Hat, SAP 6D Global Adobe Accelera Solutions AppSense, EMC, HP, Imprivata, Liquidware Labs, Nutanix, Precise Biometrics, Red Hat, ServiceNow, Tintri, Vmware Adaptive Cyber RSA Adapture F5 Aderas, Inc. Delphix Advanced Computer Concepts Adobe, Condusiv, Gigamon, Nimble, RSA, SafeNet, Symantec, Veritas Advanced Market Place HP, Symantec Advanced Network Management F5, Splunk, VMware Advantaged Solutions SAP Affigent, LLC (Formerly TKCIS) Adobe, Axway, QTS, Salesforce.com, SAP Agilet Solutions Symantec Agosto Google Aikya Incorporated Salesforce.com AITS (Advanced IT Services, LLC) Symantec Akira Technologies Adobe Alamo City Engineering Services, Inc Adobe, AvePoint, Avue, HP, IBM, Imperva, Oblong, Precise Biometrics, Socrata, Tripwire Alchemy Technology Group AppSense Alexander Open Systems (AOS) F5 Alliance Technology Group Symantec Allied Network Solutions Adobe, SAP Alpha Sum Business Machines Adobe, Symantec, Veritas Alpha Technologies Tintri AlphaSix Corp (Synnex) Adobe, Arista, Nutanix, Splunk, Qlik Alvarez & Associates Adobe Amerinet of Michigan F5 AnaVation, LLC Salesforce.com Angus-Hamer, Inc. Adobe Apollo (Group) Information Systems Arista, FireEye Applied Engineering Management Carahsoft CON-SKUs Corp/Vizuri Aprisa Technology Adobe, EMC, RSA, Symantec, Veritas, Vmware Aquila HP, FireEye ARH, LLC EMC, F5, Symantec Assurance Data Imperva Atrion Nimble ATSolutions Inc Nimble August Schell ALL Aurora Adobe, Jama, Symantec Aurotech Veritas Avid Systems Good Technology/Blackberry, Precise Biometrics, RSA B7 ALL BAI Federal / Blackwood Associates Inc FireEye, Gigamon, Infoblox, Splunk BCS Systems Kofax Bear Bridge Symantec, Veritas Bear Data F5 Bell Techlogix Symantec, Vmware BizTech Fusion Box Black Box Network Services Certipath Blue Door Networks Splunk Blue Tech Adobe, Jama, SafeNet, Symantec Bluesource Inc Symantec Buchanan & Edwards EMC, F5, SAP Cambridge Computer Services Nimble Carolina Advanced Digital Infoblox Cask, LLC. -
Case Study: Internet Explorer 1994..1997
Case Study: Internet Explorer 1994..1997 Ben Slivka General Manager Windows UI [email protected] Internet Explorer Chronology 8/94 IE effort begins 12/94 License Spyglass Mosaic source code 7/95 IE 1.0 ships as Windows 95 feature 11/95 IE 2.0 ships 3/96 MS Professional Developer’s Conference AOL deal, Java license announced 8/96 IE 3.0 ships, wins all but PC Mag review 9/97 IE 4.0 ships, wins all the reviews IE Feature Chronology IE 1.0 (7/14/95) IE 2.0 (11/17/95) HTML 2.0 HTML Tables, other NS enhancements HTML <font face=> Cell background colors & images Progressive Rendering HTTP cookies (arthurbi) Windows Integration SSL Start.Run HTML (MS enhancements) Internet Shortcuts <marquee> Password Caching background sounds Auto Connect, in-line AVIs Disconnect Active VRML 1.0 Navigator parity MS innovation Feature Chronology - continued IE 3.0 (8/12/96) IE 3.0 - continued... IE 4.0 (9/12/97) Java Accessibility Dynamic HTML (W3C) HTML Frames PICS (W3C) Data Binding Floating frames HTML CSS (W3C) 2D positioning Componentized HTML <object> (W3C) Java JDK 1.1 ActiveX Scripting ActiveX Controls Explorer Bars JavaScript Code Download Active Setup VBScript Code Signing Active Channels MSHTML, SHDOCVW IEAK (corporations) CDF (XML) WININET, URLMON Internet Setup Wizard Security Zones DocObj hosting Referral Server Windows Integration Single Explorer ActiveDesktop™ Navigator parity MS innovation Quick Launch, … Wins for IE • Quality • CoolBar, Explorer Bars • Componetization • Great Mail/News Client • ActiveX Controls – Outlook Express – vs. Nav plug-ins -
Planning for Internet Explorer and the IEAK
02_Inst.fm Page 15 Monday, October 16, 2000 9:40 AM TWO 2Chapter 2 Planning for Internet Explorer and the IEAK LChapter Syllabus In this chapter, we will look at material covered in the Planning section of Microsoft’s Implementing MCSE 2.1 Addressing Technical Needs, Rules, and Policies and Supporting Microsoft Internet Explorer 5 by using the Internet Explorer Administration Kit exam MCSE 2.2 Planning for Custom (70-080). After reading this chapter, you should be Installations and Settings able to: MCSE 2.3 Providing Multiple • Identify and evaluate the technical needs of business Language Support units, such as Internet Service Providers (ISPs), con- tent providers, and corporate administrators. MCSE 2.4 Providing Multiple Platform Support • Design solutions based on organizational rules and policies for ISPs, content providers, and corporate MCSE 2.5 Developing Security Strategies administrators. • Evaluate which components to include in a custom- MCSE 2.6 Configuring for Offline ized Internet Explorer installation package for a given Viewing deployment scenario. MCSE 2.7 Replacing Other Browsers • Develop appropriate security strategies for using Internet Explorer at various sites, including public MCSE 2.8 Developing CMAK kiosks, general business sites, single-task-based sites, Strategies and intranet-only sites. 15 02_Inst.fm Page 16 Monday, October 16, 2000 9:40 AM 16 Chapter 2 • Planning for Internet Explorer and the IEAK • Configure offline viewing for various types of users, including gen- eral business users, single-task users, and mobile users. • Develop strategies for replacing other Internet browsers, such as Netscape Navigator and previous versions of Internet Explorer. • Decide which custom settings to configure for Microsoft Outlook Express for a given scenario. -
Research Articles in the American Economic Review, the RAND Journal Ofeconomics, The
3 I. Introduction And Qualifications 1. My name is Nicholas S. Economides. I am a Professor ofEconomics at the Stern School ofBusiness ofNew York University, located at 44 West 4th Street New York, NY 10012. 2. I received a B.Sc. degree in Mathematical Economics (first class honors) from the London School ofEconomics in 1976, a Masters degree in Economics from the University of California at Berkeley in 1979 and a Ph.D. degree in Economics from Berkeley in 1981, specializing in Industrial Organization. 3. From 1981 to 1988, I was assistant and then associate professor ofeconomics at Columbia University. From 1988 to 1990, I was associate professor ofeconomics at Stanford University. I have taught at the Stern School ofBusiness since 1990. During the academic year 1996-1997, I was visiting professor at Stanford University. 4. I have published more than seventy research papers in the areas ofindustrial organization, microeconomics, network economics, antitrust, finance, and telecommunications policy, and I have given numerous seminar presentations at academic and government institutions and conferences. I have published academic research articles in the American Economic Review, the RAND Journal ofEconomics, the International Journal ofIndustrial Organization, the International Economic Review, the Journal ofEconomic Theory, and the Journal ofIndustrial Economics, among others. I am currently editor ofthe International Journal ofIndustrial Organization and ofNetnomics. I have served as advisor and consultant to major telecommunications companies, a number of 4 the Federal Reserve Banks, the Bank ofGreece, and major Financial Exchanges. I teach graduate (MBA and Ph.D.) courses in antitrust, industrial organization, microeconomics, and telecommunications. A copy ofmy curriculum vitae is attached as Attachment 1. -
NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0
NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 Americas Headquarters Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134-1706 USA http://www.cisco.com Tel: 408 526-4000 800 553-NETS (6387) Fax: 408 527-0883 © 2013 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Release Notes for NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 1 CHAPTER 2 BGP 3 BITTORRENT 6 CITRIX 7 DHCP 8 DIRECTCONNECT 9 DNS 10 EDONKEY 11 EGP 12 EIGRP 13 EXCHANGE 14 FASTTRACK 15 FINGER 16 FTP 17 GNUTELLA 18 GOPHER 19 GRE 20 H323 21 HTTP 22 ICMP 23 IMAP 24 IPINIP 25 IPV6-ICMP 26 IRC 27 KAZAA2 28 KERBEROS 29 L2TP 30 NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 iii Contents LDAP 31 MGCP 32 NETBIOS 33 NETSHOW 34 NFS 35 NNTP 36 NOTES 37 NTP 38 OSPF 39 POP3 40 PPTP 41 PRINTER 42 RIP 43 RTCP 44 RTP 45 RTSP 46 SAP 47 SECURE-FTP 48 SECURE-HTTP 49 SECURE-IMAP 50 SECURE-IRC 51 SECURE-LDAP 52 SECURE-NNTP 53 SECURE-POP3 54 SECURE-TELNET 55 SIP 56 SKINNY 57 SKYPE 58 SMTP 59 SNMP 60 SOCKS 61 SQLNET 62 SQLSERVER 63 SSH 64 STREAMWORK 65 NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 iv Contents SUNRPC 66 SYSLOG 67 TELNET 68 TFTP 69 VDOLIVE 70 WINMX 71 NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 v Contents NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 vi CHAPTER 1 Release Notes for NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack Overview The Network Based Application Recognition (NBAR2) Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 is provided as the base protocol pack with an unlicensed Cisco image on a device. -
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the Appropriate Box)
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 SCHEDULE 14A (Rule 14a-101) INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☒ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 1 Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: 2 Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: 3 Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): 4 Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: 5 Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. 1 Amount previously paid: 2 Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: 3 Filing party: 4 Date Filed: Table of Contents Dear Fellow Stockholders: Since our founding in 1998, Akamai has developed unique technology and an unmatched global infrastructure—the Akamai Intelligent Platform. -
Microsoft Palladium
Microsoft Palladium: A Business Overview Combining Microsoft Windows Features, Personal Computing Hardware, and Software Applications for Greater Security, Personal Privacy, and System Integrity by Amy Carroll, Mario Juarez, Julia Polk, Tony Leininger Microsoft Content Security Business Unit June 2002 Legal Notice This is a preliminary document and may be changed substantially prior to final commercial release of the software described herein. The information contained in this document represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication. This White Paper is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft may have patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this document. Except as expressly provided in any written license agreement from Microsoft, the furnishing of this document does not give you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property. Unless otherwise noted, the example companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places and events depicted herein are fictitious, and no association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, e-mail address, logo, person, place or event is intended or should be inferred. -
Salesforce Shield
Salesforce Shield Enhance protection, monitoring, and retention of critical Salesforce data Overview The State of Cloud Security Companies of all sizes and industries are using Salesforce across departments to run their businesses faster. As adoption of Salesforce for critical business capabilities grows, monitoring Security and user behavior, tracking changes to data, and preventing data privacy concerns loss is more important than ever. With more sensitive data in are the top the cloud, security and compliance requirements also become inhibitors IT organizations face increasingly complex. Salesforce Shield helps address these when trying to integrate requirements while allowing you to proactively monitor user data for a shared single activity and enforce security policies. view of customers.* Salesforce Shield provides enhanced protection, monitoring, and retention of your critical data stored in Salesforce. Improving security policies and practices is the top • Native Encryption: Natively encrypt your most sensitive data priority for IT teams while retaining critical app functionality including search, over the next 12 to 18 workflow, and validation rules. months.* • Detailed Data & Monitoring: Gain access to detailed performance, security, and usage data for your Salesforce 65% apps in order to monitor critical business data, understand of IT leaders plan on user adoption across your apps, and troubleshoot and increasing data stored in optimize custom application performance. the cloud over the next 12 - 18 months.* • Security Policies: Build flexible, customizable security policies that give IT the power to identify and prevent malicious activity in real time. Retain data history for forensic * Salesforce State of IT level compliance as well as greater operational insights into Report, 2017 your business.