DOCSLIB.ORG

Poroshenko Elected President on Successful Election Free and Fair Election PARSIPPANY, N.J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poroshenko Elected President on Successful Election Free and Fair Election PARSIPPANY, N.J INSIDE: l Expert says “tide has turned a bit” for Ukraine – page 3 l More on the UNA’s 38th Regular Convention – pages 4-5 l Chicago premiere of composition honoring Shevchenko – page 11 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXII No. 22 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 1, 2014 $2.00 Western leaders congratulate Ukraine Poroshenko elected president on successful election Free and fair election PARSIPPANY, N.J. – Leaders of the foils Putin’s scheme United States, NATO and the European Union on May 25 and 26 issued state- by Zenon Zawada ments congratulating the people of KYIV – Confectionary magnate Petro Ukraine on the presidential election Poroshenko, 48, was elected Ukraine’s fifth successfully held on May 25 and president on May 25 when nearly 55 per- pledged to work with the new president cent of voters cast their ballots for him, giv- of Ukraine as the country seeks to ing him the needed majority to avoid a run- determines it own future. off. Runner-up Yulia Tymoshenko earned Below are the full texts of their about 13 percent of the vote. statements about the historic election. Buttressing Mr. Poroshenko’s convincing Statement by President Barack victory was the absence of any reports of Obama, May 25: massive, organized fraud or intimidation of On behalf of all Americans, I congrat- voters and commissioners in the presiden- ulate the people of Ukraine for making tial vote beyond the violence-plagued their voices heard by voting in their Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. The election presidential election today. Despite earned a unanimous stamp of approval provocations and violence, millions of from international election observers. Ukrainians went to the polls through- “This was the most important election in out the country, and even in parts of independent Ukraine’s history,” said a eastern Ukraine, where Russian-backed statement from the election-observing mis- separatist groups sought to disenfran- sion of the National Democratic Institute chise entire regions, some courageous that was read at a May 26 press conference Ukrainians still were able to cast their in Kyiv by its chair, Madeleine K. Albright. ballots. We commend the resolve of all “By turning out to vote yesterday across those who participated, as well as the the vast majority of the country, Ukrainians efforts of the Ukrainian government to did more than elect a new president. They conduct these elections in the face of showed the world their commitment to those threats. sovereignty, unity and democracy.” Throughout the last few months, the The free and fair vote, combined with Ukrainian people have repeatedly the 60 percent voter turnout rate and con- solidation behind Mr. Poroshenko, served demonstrated their desire to choose Facebook/Petro Poroshenko their leaders without interference and (Continued on page 15) Petro Poroshenko and his wife, Maryna, cast their ballots on election day. to live in a democracy where they can determine their own future free of vio- lence and intimidation. This election is another important step forward in the efforts of the Ukrainian government to UWC and UCCA release preliminary observations on elections unify the country and reach out to all of its citizens to ensure their concerns are addressed and aspirations met. UWC: Vote met international standards UCCA: Ukrainians demonstrated The United States looks forward to for conduct of democratic elections their commitment to democracy working with the next president, as well as the democratically elected The Ukrainian World Congress International Observation Mission The preliminary statement below was released by the Ukrainian Parliament, to support Ukraine’s efforts on May 26 released its preliminary observations, which were signed Congress Committee of America on May 26. by Bohdan Futey, head of mission, and Peter Sztyk, chief observer. to enact important political and eco- The Ukrainian Congress Committee of America’s International nomic reforms. We also continue to sup- The Ukrainian World Congress (UWC) International Election Election Observer Mission, which observed the elections in every port Ukraine’s sovereignty and territori- Observation Mission (UWC Mission) is the third largest region of Ukraine, including Cherkasy, Dnipropetrovsk, Ivano- al integrity, condemn and reject Russia’s international observation mission to the early presidential election Frankivsk, Kharkiv, Kherson, Kyiv, Lviv, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Poltava, occupation and attempted annexation of in Ukraine after the observation missions of the Organization for Sumy, Zakarpattia, Zaporizhia and Zhytomyr, as well as at the Crimea, and remain committed to work- Security and Cooperatoin in Europea (OSCE) and the European diplomatic posts in the United States – affirms that the May 25 ing with Ukraine and other partners to Network of Election Monitoring Organizations. (ENEMO). elections met international standards for free and fair elections find a peaceful resolution to the conflict. The UWC Mission numbers 236 observers who have travelled and accurately reflects the will of the Ukrainian electorate. Statement by U.S. Secretary of to Ukraine from 22 countries (including observers from the World Despite minor infractions, including the presence of campaign State John Kerry, May 26: Congress of Ukrainian Youth Organizations, who were supported advertisements in a few municipalities, instances of inaccurate The United States congratulates the by the International Renaissance Foundation). voter lists in a handful of precincts, and voter frustration with people of Ukraine and the Ukrainian The conclusions of the UWC Mission are based upon direct long lines in Kyiv, the 222 officially registered UCCA international government for their historic elections observations by its short-term observers and meetings held with election observers who visited over 600 polling stations reported on May 25. officials from state institutions, representatives of political parties, that the voting process was conducted in a peaceful, transparent media, civil society and the international community. and democratic manner. (Continued on page 14) (Continued on page 14) (Continued on page 14) 2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 1, 2014 No. 22 ANALYSIS Ukrainian businessmen support Obama speaks with Poroshenko Poroshenko secure the presidency “an expression of the will” of the country’s citi- WASHINGTON – President Barack zens. “The presidential election was char- paramilitary units in state service Obama called Ukraine’s president-elect on acterized by high turnout and a clear May 27 to offer his congratulations and resolve by the authorities to hold what was started operating in the nearby Donbas assurances of U.S. support for Ukraine. The by Vladimir Socor a genuine election largely in line with inter- (see below). White House, Office of the Press Secretary Eurasia Daily Monitor national commitments and respecting fun- On April 13 the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast released the following information: May 20 damental freedoms, despite the hostile administration announced the decision to “President Obama called President-elect Ukrainian forces are struggling to con- set up a Dnipro 1 Battalion in that oblast, Petro Poroshenko of Ukraine today to con- security environment in two eastern tain Russia’s proxy insurgency in the sponsored by billionaire governor Igor gratulate him on his victory and offer the regions of the country,” the leaders said in Donbas (Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts). Kolomoisky, at the disposal of Ukraine’s full support of the United States as he seeks the statement. The leaders added that they The Ukrainian “anti-terrorist operation,” Ministry of Internal Affairs. Shortly thereaf- to unify and move his country forward. The “stand firm in upholding Ukraine’s sover- under way since April 13, remains incon- ter, the same administration announced president stressed the importance of eignty and territorial integrity” and con- clusive thus far. This operation has revealed plans to set up a further battalion, with per- quickly implementing the reforms neces- demn Russia’s “illegal annexation” of how deeply Ukraine’s army and police sonnel from the former Berkut elite unit sary for Ukraine to bring the country Ukraine’s Crimea territory in March. They were hollowed out in recent years, materi- (disbanded merely three months ago). On together and to develop a sustainable econ- also called on Moscow to engage with Mr. ally and morally. May 11, the Defense Ministry approved omy, attractive investment climate, and Poroshenko, to withdraw its troops from The insurgency’s nucleus of combatants plans to create two battalions of territorial transparent and accountable government Ukraine’s borders, and to “use its leverage from Russia turns out to have been overrat- defense in that same oblast. Additionally, that is responsive to the concerns and aspi- on the armed separatists to de-escalate the ed; and their locally recruited auxiliaries Mr. Kolomoisky is advertising his private rations of all Ukrainians. The United States situation in eastern Ukraine.” French President Francois Hollande said that if the seem little more than a scattered rabble, offer of bounties for the capture of armed will continue assisting Ukraine in these Kremlin fails to cooperate or help end the deeply disappointing the Russian com- insurgents (1 + 1 TV, May 12; euromaidan- efforts. The two leaders agreed to continue violence in eastern Ukraine, Russia could mander Igor Girkin, a.k.a. Strelkov (video pr.org, accessed May 19). their conversation during the President’s face a fresh round of sanctions. “President address via Ukraiynska Pravda, May 18). On May 2 in the Mykolayiv Oblast, agri- upcoming trip to Europe.” (White House) Putin must now not only respect the [elec- The insurgents are too weak to establish business entrepreneur Oleksiy Vadaturskiy Obama, Poroshenko to meet tion] outcome but also recognize the any compact territorial base (unless and announced his offers to equip and pay vol- Ukraine president and make sure there is a until further reinforced from Russia). They unteers for road patrols and checkpoints. KYIV – The White House confirmed on May 28 that a meeting of U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Academia Militar
    ACADEMIA MILITAR Análise da Intervenção Russa na Crimeia Autor: Aspirante de Cavalaria Tiago Filipe Simões Ramos Orientador: Professor Catedrático António José Telo Mestrado Integrado em Ciências Militares, na especialidade de Cavalaria Relatório Científico Final do Trabalho de Investigação Aplicada Lisboa, setembro de 2019 ACADEMIA MILITAR Análise da Intervenção Russa na Crimeia Autor: Aspirante de Cavalaria Tiago Filipe Simões Ramos Orientador: Professor Catedrático António José Telo Mestrado Integrado em Ciências Militares, na especialidade de Cavalaria Relatório Científico Final do Trabalho de Investigação Aplicada Lisboa, setembro de 2019 EPÍGRAFE “Submeter o inimigo sem combater é a excelência suprema.” Sun Tzu i DEDICATÓRIA À minha família. ii AGRADECIMENTOS Esta dissertação representa o culminar dos anos de trabalho, cujo produto não vem só do esforço individual, mas também do apoio de muitos outros, cuja menção é necessária para lhes dar o merecido mérito. Quero começar por agradecer à Academia Militar, instituição que me acolheu, sem a qual não estaria onde estou. Ao Curso Tenente General Bernardim Freire de Andrade, o meu curso de entrada, por todos os momentos partilhados, no “conhaque” e no “trabalho”, desde o início até ao fim da viagem. Ao curso Tenente General de Artilharia e Engenheiro Mor Luís Serrão Pimentel, por me ter acolhido a meio caminho e nunca me ter desenquadrado. Em ambos tenho amigos, sem os quais os longos anos tinham sido ainda mais longos. Ao meu diretor de curso, o Tenente-Coronel de Cavalaria Baltazar, pela dedicação, empenho e paciência na transmissão dos ensinamentos e pela integração no espírito da arma. Ao meu orientador, Professor Catedrático António Telo, cujos conhecimentos e orientação permitiram o desenvolvimento deste trabalho.
    [Show full text]
  • The Valery Gerasimov Doctrine *S
    The Valery Gerasimov Doctrine *S. M. Azharul Islam Introduction The "Valery Gerasimov Doctrine" is named after the Russian Chief of the General Staff, General Valery Gerasimov. This doctrine consists of military, technological, informational, diplomatic, economic, cultural, and other concerned tactics to accomplish strategic goals. The principle puts more emphasis on the use of nonmilitary means to achieve the desired goals. However, this theory of modern warfare mentions that military standards are also crucial even in today's context. It has often been described as a distinct form of war, also termed Russia's version of hybrid warfare. This commentary will explain the notable "Valery Gerasimov Doctrine". The Valery Gerasimov Doctrine: A Brief Overview Army General Valery Gerasimov, the Chief of Russia's General Staff and First Deputy Defense Minister, published an article that made headlines. The article was titled "The Value of Science is in the Foresight: New Challenges Demand Rethinking the Forms and Methods of Carrying out Combat Operations." This article proposed a new form of Russian warfare that blends conventional and unconventional warfare in a holistic approach to achieving strategic goals. Owing to the reaction of the Russian Federation to the crisis in Ukraine, this article gained traction in the professional and academic sphere. It is a part of the Russian Chief of the General Staff's duty to develop futuristic theories to prepare for warfare. The term 'foresight' has also been used in the title of the article to denote the process of transformation in the military sector to keep up with rapid future developments. Foresight has a direct link with the future of warfare in the Russian defence sphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Gerasimov Right Charles K
    Getting Gerasimov Right Charles K. Bartles n 26 February 2013, chief of the Russian General Staff Gen. Valery Gerasimov published “The Value of Science Is in the OForesight: New Challenges Demand Rethinking the Forms and Methods of Carrying out Combat Operations” in Voyenno-Promyshlennyy Kurier (VPK) (Military-Industrial Courier). In this article, Gerasimov lays out his perspective—and the prevalent view in (Photo courtesy of the Press Service of the Russian Defense Ministry) Russian security circles—of the recent past, present, Chief of the Russian General Staff Gen. Valery Gerasimov and expected future of warfare. This article was pub- lished about a year before the Maidan protests that set in motion the events leading to the eventual annex- Staff has far more authority than any flag grade officer ation of Crimea and Russian-sponsored insurrection in the U.S. military. He is responsible for long-term in eastern Ukraine.1 The chain of events that followed planning duties equivalent to both the U.S. Office the Maidan protests could in no way be foreseen by of the Secretary of Defense and the unified com- Gerasimov, but his article is often cited in the West batant commanders. In addition, he has oversight as “Gerasimov’s Doctrine” for the way Russian forces of strategic transportation equivalent to that of U.S. conducted its operations. Transportation Command, force doctrinal and capa- In this vein of Western thinking, Gerasimov’s ar- bilities development, and equipment procurement for ticle is often interpreted as proposing a new Russian all branches of the Ministry of Defense. He even has way of warfare that blends conventional and uncon- an inspector-general-like function for ensuring that ventional warfare with aspects of national power, General Staff standards and regulations are adhered to.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Hybrid Warfare
    Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No. 105 – November 2014 Russia’s Hybrid Warfare Waging War below the Radar of Traditional Collective Defence by H. Reisinger and A. Golts1 “You can’t modernize a large country with a small war” Karl Schlögel The Research Division (RD) of the NATO De- fense College provides NATO’s senior leaders with “Ukraine is not even a state!” Putin reportedly advised former US President sound and timely analyses and recommendations on current issues of particular concern for the Al- George W. Bush during the 2008 NATO Summit in Bucharest. In 2014 this liance. Papers produced by the Research Division perception became reality. Russian behaviour during the current Ukraine convey NATO’s positions to the wider audience of the international strategic community and con- crisis was based on the traditional Russian idea of a “sphere of influence” and tribute to strengthening the Transatlantic Link. a special responsibility or, stated more bluntly, the “right to interfere” with The RD’s civil and military researchers come from countries in its “near abroad”. This perspective is also implied by the equally a variety of disciplines and interests covering a 2 broad spectrum of security-related issues. They misleading term “post-Soviet space.” The successor states of the Soviet conduct research on topics which are of interest to Union are sovereign countries that have developed differently and therefore the political and military decision-making bodies of the Alliance and its member states. no longer have much in common. Some of them are members of the European Union and NATO, while others are desperately trying to achieve The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Gerasimov Doctrine' and Russian Non Linear
    3/9/2017 The ‘Gerasimov Doctrine’ and Russian Non-Linear War | In Moscow's Shadows The ‘Gerasimov Doctrine’ and Russian Non­ Linear War A BELATED BUT HEART­FELT PS: When using the term ‘Gerasimov Doctrine,’ I was just going for a snappy title. I really didn’t expect (or want) it to become a more generally used term. Why? (a) Gerasimov didn’t invent this; if any CoGS deserves the ‘credit’ it would be his predecessor Makarov, but even so it is really an evolutionary, not revolutionary process; and (b) it’s not a doctrine, which is in the Russian lexicon a truly foundational set of beliefs as to what kinds of war the country will be fighting in the future and how it will win them — this is more an observation about a particular aspect of particular kinds of wars in the 21stC, there is certainly no expectation that this is the Russian way of war. So stop it, please! Call it non­linear war (which I prefer), or hybrid war, or special war, Russia’s operations first in Crimea and then eastern Ukraine have demonstrated that Moscow is increasingly focusing on new forms of politically-focused operations in the future. In many ways this is an extension of what elsewhere I’ve called Russia’s ‘guerrilla geopolitics,’ an appreciation of the fact that in a world shaped by an international order the Kremlin finds increasingly irksome and facing powers and alliances with greater raw military, political and economic power, new tactics are needed which focus on the enemy’s weaknesses and avoid direct and overt confrontations.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhoodperspectives Forum Eastern Partnership
    Issue 3 (13), 2018 BORDERS EAST STRATEGY CIVIL SOCIETY FORUM CHANGES PRAGUE DELIVERABLES UKRAINE POLICY EUROPEAN UNION REFORMS ASSOCIATION NEIGHBOURHOOD EASTERN PARTNERSHIP RUSSIA WEST PESCO DELIVERABLES FORUM BORDERS BORDERS ASSOCIATION PERSPECTIVES CHANGES UA: Ukraine Analytica · 3 (13), 2018 • EASTERN PARTNERSHIP • NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICY • EUROPEAN UNION 1 BOARD OF ADVISERS Dr. Dimitar Bechev (Bulgaria, Director of the European Policy Institute) Issue 3 (13), 2018 Dr. Iulian Chifu Analysis and Early Warning Center) (Romania, Director of the Conflict European Neighrborhood Amb., Dr. Sergiy Korsunsky (Ukraine, Director of the Diplomatic Academy under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine) Editors Dr. Igor Koval (Ukraine, Rector of Odessa National Dr. Hanna Shelest University by I.I. Mechnikov) Dr. Mykola Kapitonenko Amb., Dr. Sergey Minasyan (Armenia, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Armenia to Romania) Publisher: Published by NGO “Promotion of Intercultural (Germany, Director of the Cooperation” (Ukraine), Centre of International Marcel Röthig Representation of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Ukraine) of the Representation of the Friedrich Ebert Studies (Ukraine), with the financial support Foundation in Ukraine, and the Black Sea Trust. James Nixey (United Kingdom, Head of the Russia and Eurasia Programme at Chatham House, the UA: Ukraine Analytica Royal Institute of International Affairs) analytical journal in English on International is the first Ukrainian Relations, Politics and Economics. The journal Dr. Róbert Ondrejcsák (Slovakia, State Secretary, is aimed for experts, diplomats, academics, Ministry of Defence) students interested in the international relations and Ukraine in particular. Amb., Dr. Oleg Shamshur (Ukraine, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Ukraine to Contacts: France) website: http://ukraine-analytica.org/ e-mail: [email protected] Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Poisoned by Gas: Institutional Failure, Energy Dependency, and Security
    POISONED BY GAS: INSTITUTIONAL FAILURE, ENERGY DEPENDENCY, AND SECURITY EMILY J. HOLLAND SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 EMILY J. HOLLAND ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT POISONED BY GAS: INSTITUTIONAL FAILURE, ENERGY DEPENDENCY, AND SECURITY EMILY J. HOLLAND Many states lack domestic access to crucial energy supplies and must deal with the challenge of formulating an energy security policy that informs their relations with energy producing states. While secure and uninterrupted access to energy is crucial to state security and welfare, some states fail to implement energy security policies and remain dangerously dependent on a foreign supplier. In the post-Soviet region many states even actively resist attempts by the European Union and others to diversify their supplies. Why and under what conditions do states pursue energy security? Conversely, why do some highly dependent states fail to maximize their security vis-à-vis a dominant supplier? I argue that that to understand the complex nature of energy dependence and security it is necessary to look beyond energy markets to domestic political capture and institutional design. More specifically, I argue that initial reform choices guiding transition had long-lasting affects on the ability to make coherent policy choices. States that did not move away from Soviet era property rights empowered actors with an interest in maintaining the status quo of dependence. Others that instituted de facto democratic property rights to guide their energy transitions were able to block energy veto players and move towards a security maximizing diversification policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mare Nostrum Strategy: Russian Military Activity in the Black Sea
    SPECIAL REPORT 03/21/2019 MARE NOSTRUM STRATEGY: RUSSIAN MILITARY ACTIVITY IN THE BLACK SEA Warsaw Institute MARE NOSTRUM STRATEGY: RUSSIAN MILITARY ACTIVITY IN THE BLACK SEA SOURCE: MIL.RU l Owing to its geographic location, Russia’s prerequisite to acquire and maintain the status of a superpower has long been to seize and retain control over two maritime „windows to the world.” This strategy was first mapped out by Peter the Great and led to multiple wars in the Baltic and Black Seas. l Russia has in the past focused on intensifying its activities in the south, as exemplified by the conflict with Ukraine and Moscow’s armed intervention in the Syrian civil war. Symbolically, this is illustrated by making the Black Sea city of Sochi Russia’s „summer capital” and a place where Vladimir Putin hosts world leaders and Kremlin officials. l The Black Sea is to become a platform from where Russia is able to exert influence on neighboring regions, including the Middle East, the Balkans and the Mediterranean countries. The Kremlin’s accom- plishments in the Black Sea region and friendly ties with the Turkish authorities successfully obstructed shipping Caspian hydrocarbon supplies to Europe. l Thanks to the annexation of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 and increased combat capabilities in the immediate vicinity of the peninsula, Russia finally managed to regain dominance across the Black Sea it had lost in 1991. For Russia, it is vital to exert full control over Crimea as it will permit the Kremlin to hold Kiev in check while extending field reconnaissance activities and firing capabilities to the vast area of the Black Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Culture of Strategic Thought Behind Russia's Modern
    DEFENSE AND INTELLIGENCE PROJECTS The Culture of Strategic Thought Behind Russia’s Modern Approaches to Warfare Stephen R. Covington Foreword by Kevin Ryan PAPER OCTOBER 2016 Defense and Intelligence Projects Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/DefenseIntelligence The views in this article are the personal views of the author and do not represent the official views of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers, Europe. Design & Layout by Andrew Facini Cover photo: Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, listens to Chief of Russia’s military’s General Staff Valery Gerasimov, right, as he observes military exercises near the Baikal Lake in Russia on Wednesday, July 17, 2013. (AP Photo/RIA Novosti, Alexei Nikolsky, Presidential Press Service) Copyright 2016, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America DEFENSE AND INTELLIGENCE PROJECTS The Culture of Strategic Thought Behind Russia’s Modern Approaches to Warfare Stephen R. Covington Foreword by Kevin Ryan PAPER OCTOBER 2016 About the Author Stephen R. Covington is a Strategic Fellow with the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and has advised 10 Supreme Allied Commanders, Europe on international affairs over a 27-year period. The views in this article are the personal views of the author and do not represent the official views of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers, Europe. Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Policy-Making and New Modes of Governance in the European Neighborhood Policy
    Robert Schuman Policy-making and New Modes of Governance in the European Neighborhood Policy Stefan Gaenzle Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series Vol. 8 No. 8 May 2008 Published with the support of the EU Commission. The Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series The Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series is produced by the Jean Monnet Chair of the University of Miami, in cooperation with the Miami-Florida European Union Center of Excellence, a partnership with Florida International University (FIU). These monographic papers analyze ongoing developments within the European Union as well as recent trends which influence the EU’s relationship with the rest of the world. Broad themes include, but are not limited to: ♦ EU Enlargement ♦ The Evolution of the Constitutional Process ♦ The EU as a Global Player ♦ Comparative Regionalisms ♦ The Trans-Atlantic Agenda ♦ EU-Latin American Relations ♦ Economic issues ♦ Governance ♦ The EU and its Citizens ♦ EU Law As the process of European integration evolves further, the Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Papers is intended to provide current analyses on a wide range of issues relevant to the EU. The overall purpose of the monographic papers is to contribute to a better understanding of the unique nature of the EU and the significance of its role in the world. Miami - Florida European Union Center Jean Monnet Chair Staff University of Miami Joaquín Roy (Director) 1000 Memorial Drive Astrid Boening (Associate Director) 101 Ferré Building María Lorca (Associate Editor) Coral Gables, FL 33124-2231 Shannon Gibson
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels Brussels Brussels Brussels Brussels Kiev Kiev
    Interlocutors Meeting date Place Meeting Mr Andrii Goncharuk, Adviser of the President of Ukraine 09/01/2013 Brussels Meeting with Kostiantyn Yelisieiev, Head of the Mission of Ukraine to 17/01/2013 Brussels the EU Meeting with Mr Nemyria, Chairman of the Committee on European 28/01/2013 Brussels integration, Ukraine's Parliament Dinner with Mr Leonid Kozhara, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine 30/01/2013 Brussels Meeting Group of friends of Ukraine in the margins of FA Council, 31/01/2013 Brussels Ukrainian MFA Leonid Kozhara Official visit to Ukraine – Meetings with Mykola AZAROV, Prime 07/02/2013 Kiev Minister of Ukraine; Attend the meeting of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and speech; meets the heads of all parliamentary groups of the Verkhovna Rada; meeting with Valeriya LUTKOVSKA, Ukrainian Parliament's Commissioner for Human Rights Meeting with Viktor YANUKOVICH, President of Ukraine 08/02/2013 Kiev Lunch with Ukrainian MP Poroshenko 07/03/2013 Brussels Meeting with MP Arsenyi Yatsenyuk, Leader of the United Opposition 23/04/2013 Brussels in Ukraine and Chairman of ''Batkivshyna'' group in Ukrainian Parliament Meeting with Andriy Klyuyev, Secretary of Ukraine’s National Security 24/04/2013 Brussels and Defence Council Dinner with Sergiy Arbuzov, First Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine 29/04/2013 Brussels Meeting with Leonid Kozhara, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, in 17/05/2013 Krakow margins of the meeting of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Visegrad Group Meeting with Andriy Klyuyev, Secretary of Ukraine’s
    [Show full text]
  • Faltering Fightback: Zelensky's Piecemeal Campaign Against Ukraine's Oligarchs – European Council on Foreign Relations
    POLICY BRIEF FALTERING FIGHTBACK: ZELENSKY’S PIECEMEAL CAMPAIGN AGAINST UKRAINE’S OLIGARCHS Andrew Wilson July 2021 SUMMARY Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has declared a “fightback” against oligarchs. Zelensky is motivated by worries about falling poll ratings, pressure from Russia, and a strong desire for good relations with the Biden administration. The fightback campaign has resulted in action against some oligarchs but, overall, it is incomplete. The government still needs to address reform issues in other areas, especially the judiciary, and it has an on-off relationship with the IMF because of the latter’s insistence on conditionality. The campaign has encouraged Zelensky’s tendency towards governance through informal means. This has allowed him to act speedily – but it risks letting oligarchic influence return and enabling easy reversal of reforms in the future. Introduction On 12 March this year, Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, released a short appeal on YouTube called “Ukraine fights back”. He declared that he was preparing to take on those who have been undermining the country – those who have exploited Ukraine’s weaknesses in particular, including its frail rule of law. He attacked “the oligarchic class” – and named names: “[Viktor] Medvedchuk, [Ihor] Kolomoisky, [Petro] Poroshenko, [Rinat] Akhmetov, [Viktor] Pinchuk, [Dmitry] Firtash”. He proceeded to address the oligarchs directly, asking, “Are you ready to work legally and transparently?” The president went on, “Or do you want to continue to create monopolies, control the media, influence deputies and other civil servants? The first is welcome. The second ends.” Ukrainians have heard this kind of talk before. Zelensky’s predecessor, Poroshenko, also made ‘de- oligarchisation’ a policy pledge.
    [Show full text]