TARS™ 3-15X50 (Tactical Advanced Riflescope) 2 TABLE of CONTENTS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,729,062 B2 Thomas Et Al
USOO6729062B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,729,062 B2 Thomas et al. (45) Date of Patent: May 4, 2004 (54) MIL.DOT RETICLE AND METHOD FOR 6,357,158 B1 * 3/2002 Smith, III .................... 42/122 PRODUCING THE SAME 6,429,970 B2 8/2002 Ruh ........................... 359/428 6,453,595 B1 9/2002 Sammut ...................... 42/130 (76) Inventors: Richard L. Thomas, 920 Breckenridge 2.E. R : 3: SA fetal..."8it: La., Winchester, VA (US) 22601; Chris 2- -Y/2 ammut et al. - - - - Thomas, 136 Blossom Dr., Winchester, 6,591,537 B2 * 7/2003 Smith .......................... 42/122 VA (US) 22602 OTHER PUBLICATIONS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this “Ballistic Resources LLC Introduces The Klein ReticleC)” patent is extended or adjusted under 35 by Ballistic Resources LLC. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Mildot Enterprises, Welcome to Mildot Enterprises About the Mildot Master(R) http://www.mildot.com/about.htm, 2 (21)21) Appl. NoNo.: 10/347,372/347, pp.“Illuminated Mil-Dot Reticle,” http://www.scopeuSout. 22) Filled: Jan. 21, 2003 com/oldscopes/mil-dot.html,p Mar. 25, 2002, 2 pppp. O O Leupold, “Reticle Changes & Target-Style Adjustments.” (65) Prior Publication Data http://www.leupold.com/tiret.html, Feb. 28, 2002, 8 pp. US 2004/0016168 A1 Jan. 29, 2004 Premier Reticles, Ltd., “Range Estimating Reticles,” http:// premierreticles.com/index.php?uid=5465&page= Related U.S. Application Data 1791&main=1&PHPSESSID=cf5, Oct. 13, 2003, 4 pp. (60) Provisional application No. 60/352.595, filed on Jan. -
Rifle Marksmanship and Sniper Expanded Course Outline
Rifle Marksmanship and Sniper San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Expanded Course Outline Purpose: The purpose of this course is to provide those officers assigned as snipers on a Special Weapons And Tactical (SWAT)/tactical team with the skills necessary to become expert sniper operators. I. Introduction and Orientation A. Paperwork 1. Distribute Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) roster 2. Distribute networking or regional attendance roster B. Housekeeping 1. Facility review and identify restrooms and emergency exits 2. Review breaks including breakroom and/or vending machines C. Introductions 1. Instructor and staff introductions 2. Student introductions D. Overview 1. Overview of the key learning outcomes of the class 2. Review of student and instructor expectations of the course. E. Objectives 1. Students will be able to understand and operate long rifle weapon system as they relate to SWAT incidents 2. Students will be able to observe and communicate pertinent information during SWAT incidents 3. Students will be familiar with roles and responsibilities as they relate to different types of missions 4. Students will be able demonstrate precision marksmanship skills II. Firearms Safety Review A. State the four fundamental rules of firearms safety 1. Treat all firearms as if they are loaded 2. Always keep the firearms pointed in the safest possible direction 3. Always keep finger off the trigger until ready to fire the firearm 4. Be sure of the target and what’s beyond it before firing the firearm 1 SBCSD Rifle Marksmanship and Sniper Revised Feb. 2018 JB/md Rifle Marksmanship and Sniper San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Expanded Course Outline B. -
COORDINATES, TIME, and the SKY John Thorstensen
COORDINATES, TIME, AND THE SKY John Thorstensen Department of Physics and Astronomy Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 This subject is fundamental to anyone who looks at the heavens; it is aesthetically and mathematically beautiful, and rich in history. Yet I'm not aware of any text which treats time and the sky at a level appropriate for the audience I meet in the more technical introductory astronomy course. The treatments I've seen either tend to be very lengthy and quite technical, as in the classic texts on `spherical astronomy', or overly simplified. The aim of this brief monograph is to explain these topics in a manner which takes advantage of the mathematics accessible to a college freshman with a good background in science and math. This math, with a few well-chosen extensions, makes it possible to discuss these topics with a good degree of precision and rigor. Students at this level who study this text carefully, work examples, and think about the issues involved can expect to master the subject at a useful level. While the mathematics used here are not particularly advanced, I caution that the geometry is not always trivial to visualize, and the definitions do require some careful thought even for more advanced students. Coordinate Systems for Direction Think for the moment of the problem of describing the direction of a star in the sky. Any star is so far away that, no matter where on earth you view it from, it appears to be in almost exactly the same direction. This is not necessarily the case for an object in the solar system; the moon, for instance, is only 60 earth radii away, so its direction can vary by more than a degree as seen from different points on earth. -
An Arcgis Tutorial Concerning Transformations of Geographic Coordinate Systems, with a Concentration on the Systems Used in Lao PDR
An ArcGIS Tutorial Concerning Transformations of Geographic Coordinate Systems, with a Concentration on the Systems Used in Lao PDR. Written by: Emelie Nilsson & Anna-Karin Svensson An ArcGIS Tutorial Concerning Transformations of Geographic Written by: Emelie Nilsson & Coordinate Systems, with a Concentration on the Systems Used in LaoPDR Anna-Karin Svensson Lund University, The Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Analysis Summer 2004 Introduction................................................................................................................3 PART 1, A Theoretical Background about Coordinate Systems...................................3 1.1 Geographic Coordinate Systems..........................................................................3 1.2 Projected Coordinate Systems .............................................................................6 1.2.1 Azimuthal or Planar Map Projections...........................................................6 1.2.2 Conical Map Projections...............................................................................7 1.2.3 Cylindrical Map Projections .........................................................................7 1.2.4 Conformal Projections ..................................................................................8 1.2.5 Equal-Area Projections .................................................................................8 1.2.6 Equidistant Projections .................................................................................8 1.2.7 True-Direction -
Worldwide Equipment Guide
WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles..................................................... -
Budding Mathematical Science: an Example from the Old Norse
Budding mathematical science: An example from the Old Norse Thorsteinn Vilhjálmsson Science Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland Abstract In the Viking Era of ca. 700-1100 the Old Norse, then illiterate, expanded their sphere of exploration, communication and settlement to the East through Russia and to the west to the various coasts of the North Atlantic. For the latter they needed, among other things, specialized skills such as shipbuilding, navigation and general seamanship. These skills were handed down from one generation to another by informal, practical education. Their navigational skills seem to have included methods related to mathematical astronomy. In the example treated here, the mathematics involved is adapted to the knowledge level of a society without literacy, thus replacing written symbols and formulas by a procedure which has been easy to remember and thus suitable for passing through oral channels to new generations. The method could be applied to other cases although examples of such application are unknown to the present author. Introduction We want to take a trip with the time machine, going to the North Atlantic area in the Old Norse period, stretching from AD 700-1300 or so, the term Viking Age covering the first 4 centuries of this period. Although the society we want to visit was illiterate most of the time we know a lot about it from various sources: • Late written sources, sagas and other genres, from ca. 1120-1400. • Archaeology from land and sea, showing houses, ships and all kinds of artefacts with good dating from C14, tephra layers etc, coordinated through the annual layers in the Greenland glacier. -
Magnifying Patrol Rifle Scopes Assessment Report January 2014
System Assessment and Validation for Emergency Responders (SAVER) Magnifying Patrol Rifle Scopes Assessment Report January 2014 Prepared by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The Magnifying Patrol Rifle Scopes Assessment Report was funded under Interagency Agreement No. HSHQPM-12-X-00031 from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Government. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, processes, or services by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government. The information and statements contained herein shall not be used for the purposes of advertising, nor to imply the endorsement or recommendation of the U.S. Government. With respect to documentation contained herein, neither the U.S. Government nor any of its employees make any warranty, express or implied, including but not limited to the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Further, neither the U.S. Government nor any of its employees assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed; nor do they represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Photographs and illustrations included herein were provided by the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic, unless otherwise specified. FOREWORD The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) established the System Assessment and Validation for Emergency Responders (SAVER) Program to assist emergency responders making procurement decisions. -
Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems
Dec Worldwide Equipment Guide 2016 Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems TRADOC G-2 ACE–Threats Integration Ft. Leavenworth, KS Distribution Statement: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Opposing Force: Worldwide Equipment Guide Chapters Volume 2 Volume 2 Air and Air Defense Systems Volume 2 Signature Letter Volume 2 TOC and Introduction Volume 2 Tier Tables – Fixed Wing, Rotary Wing, UAVs, Air Defense Chapter 1 Fixed Wing Aviation Chapter 2 Rotary Wing Aviation Chapter 3 UAVs Chapter 4 Aviation Countermeasures, Upgrades, Emerging Technology Chapter 5 Unconventional and SPF Arial Systems Chapter 6 Theatre Missiles Chapter 7 Air Defense Systems 2 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Units of Measure The following example symbols and abbreviations are used in this guide. Unit of Measure Parameter (°) degrees (of slope/gradient, elevation, traverse, etc.) GHz gigahertz—frequency (GHz = 1 billion hertz) hp horsepower (kWx1.341 = hp) Hz hertz—unit of frequency kg kilogram(s) (2.2 lb.) kg/cm2 kg per square centimeter—pressure km kilometer(s) km/h km per hour kt knot—speed. 1 kt = 1 nautical mile (nm) per hr. kW kilowatt(s) (1 kW = 1,000 watts) liters liters—liquid measurement (1 gal. = 3.785 liters) m meter(s)—if over 1 meter use meters; if under use mm m3 cubic meter(s) m3/hr cubic meters per hour—earth moving capacity m/hr meters per hour—operating speed (earth moving) MHz megahertz—frequency (MHz = 1 million hertz) mach mach + (factor) —aircraft velocity (average 1062 km/h) mil milliradian, radial measure (360° = 6400 mils, 6000 Russian) min minute(s) mm millimeter(s) m/s meters per second—velocity mt metric ton(s) (mt = 1,000 kg) nm nautical mile = 6076 ft (1.152 miles or 1.86 km) rd/min rounds per minute—rate of fire RHAe rolled homogeneous armor (equivalent) shp shaft horsepower—helicopter engines (kWx1.341 = shp) µm micron/micrometer—wavelength for lasers, etc. -
Types of Coordinate Systems What Are Map Projections?
What are map projections? Page 1 of 155 What are map projections? ArcGIS 10 Within ArcGIS, every dataset has a coordinate system, which is used to integrate it with other geographic data layers within a common coordinate framework such as a map. Coordinate systems enable you to integrate datasets within maps as well as to perform various integrated analytical operations such as overlaying data layers from disparate sources and coordinate systems. What is a coordinate system? Coordinate systems enable geographic datasets to use common locations for integration. A coordinate system is a reference system used to represent the locations of geographic features, imagery, and observations such as GPS locations within a common geographic framework. Each coordinate system is defined by: Its measurement framework which is either geographic (in which spherical coordinates are measured from the earth's center) or planimetric (in which the earth's coordinates are projected onto a two-dimensional planar surface). Unit of measurement (typically feet or meters for projected coordinate systems or decimal degrees for latitude–longitude). The definition of the map projection for projected coordinate systems. Other measurement system properties such as a spheroid of reference, a datum, and projection parameters like one or more standard parallels, a central meridian, and possible shifts in the x- and y-directions. Types of coordinate systems There are two common types of coordinate systems used in GIS: A global or spherical coordinate system such as latitude–longitude. These are often referred to file://C:\Documents and Settings\lisac\Local Settings\Temp\~hhB2DA.htm 10/4/2010 What are map projections? Page 2 of 155 as geographic coordinate systems. -
Tables of Trigonometric Functions in Non-Sexagesimal Arguments
Tables of Trigonometric Functions in Non-Sexagesimal Arguments Excluding the ordinary tables of trigonometric functions in sexagesimal arguments the two principal groups of such tables are those with arguments in A. Radians,—tables of this type have been already listed in RMT 81; and B. Grades. But we shall also consider tables of the trigonometric functions with arguments in C. Mils; Dl. Gones; D2. Cirs; and E. Time. B. Grades. The first stage in the evolution of the centesimal division of the quadrant was by the division of each sexagesimal degree into 100 minutes and each of these minutes into 100 seconds. This was conceived already about 1450 by Theodericus Ruffi, in a Latin codex in Munich.1 The centesimal division of the degree was also presented by Vieta in his Calendarij Gregoriani, 1600, p. "29"(Opera M athematica, 1646, p. 487). It was this source which sug- gested to Henry Briggs the choice of every hundredth of a degree as the unit in the preparation of his wonderful "sine canon";2 see RMT 79. Late in the eighteenth century the centesimal division of the quadrant was definitely in the thought of scholars then in Berlin and especially of Johann Carl Schulze (1749-1790), author of Neue und erweiterte Sammlung logarithmischer, trigonometrischer und anderer zum Gebrauch der Mathematik unentbehrlicher Tafeln [also French t.p.], Berlin, 2v., 1778. He had studied under J. H. Lambert (1728-1778) and became a member of the Academy of Sciences at Berlin, in which Lagrange (following Euler) was director of its mathematical section for a score of years before he moved to Paris in 1787. -
6411 Measure Unit Qualifier Indication of the Unit of Measurement in Which Weight (Mass), Capacity, Length, Area, Volume Or Other Quantity Is Expressed
Code list 6411 Standard: UN D.96B S3 6411 Measure unit qualifier Indication of the unit of measurement in which weight (mass), capacity, length, area, volume or other quantity is expressed. Note: See UN/ECE Recommendation 20. 04 small spray 05 lift 08 heat lot 10 group 11 outfit 13 ration 14 shot 15 stick 16 hundred fifteen kg drum 17 hundred lb drum 18 fiftyfive gallon (US) drum 19 tank truck 20 twenty foot container 21 forty foot container 22 decilitre per gram 23 gram per cubic centimetre 24 theoretical pound 25 gram per square centimetre 26 actual ton 27 theoretical ton 28 kilogram per square metre 29 pound per thousand square feet 30 horse power day per air dry metric ton 31 catch weight 32 kilogram per air dry metric ton 33 kilopascal square metres per gram 34 kilopascals per millimetre 35 millilitres per square centimetre second 36 cubic feet per minute per square foot 37 ounce per square foot 38 ounces per square foot per 0,01 inch 40 millilitre per second 41 millilitre per minute 43 super bulk bag 44 fivehundred kg bulk bag 45 threehundred kg bulk bag 46 fifty lb bulk bag 47 fifty lb bag 48 bulk car load 53 theoretical kilograms Printed by GEFEG EDIFIX® Print date: 26/09/2001 Page: 1 Code list 6411 Standard: UN D.96B S3 54 theoretical tonne 56 sitas 57 mesh 58 net kilogram 59 part per million 60 percent weight 61 part per billion (US) 62 percent per 1000 hour 63 failure rate in time 64 pound per square inch, gauge 66 oersted 69 test specific scale 71 volt ampere per pound 72 watt per pound 73 ampere tum per centimetre 74 millipascal -
Investigation 6.6.2 - Gradian Measure
Investigation 6.6.2 - Gradian measure Have you ever wondered why we have 360 degrees in a circle when our number system is base 10? Why not divide the circle into 10 angular units? Or 100? The notion of the “degree” as the base angular unit of measure is generally attributed to the Babylonians. The Babylonian numerical system was sexagesimal (base 60). The number “360” played an essential role in their calendar as it is close to the number of days in a year. Another hypothesis is that the circle divides more naturally into six parts than it does four or ten. Try drawing diameters through a circle cutting it into even parts. I. 6 equal parts II. 4 equal parts III. 10 equal parts Then draw chords by connecting consecutive diameter endpoints. Which method produces equilateral triangles? Which dissected circle has chords congruent to its radius? Now find the central angle of each dissection. Which is most closely related to the Babylonian sexagesimal number system? Now suppose we wanted to derive an angular unit of measure more closely related to our base 10 decimal system. Let us begin by dividing a right angle into 100 units, called “gradians”. (You may have this system on your calculator, denoted “grad”.) a. How many gradians are in one whole circle? b. Convert 180° into gradians. c. How many degrees make 50 gradians? If societies in science fiction have differing number of days in their respective years due to different planetary orbits, it would stand to reason that their methods for measuring angles and circles might be different from our system.