DOCSLIB.ORG

Korean Cases in Public Administration for Training and Practice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Korean Cases in Public Administration for Training and Practice KIPA Case Study Series 4 www.kipa.re.kr Korean Cases in Public Administration for Training and Practice : Cases in Citizen-Centered and Collaborative Governance Vol. KOREA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION KOREAN Chapter CASES IN PUBLIC 1 ADMINISTRATION · 7 FOR TRAINING AND Introduction - M. Jae Moon PRACTICE Chapter 2 Citizen Participation in Local CONTENTS Governance: The Case of Seoul’s Participatory Budgeting System · 15 - Sun Young Kim 16 Introduction 17 Background 19 ‌Adoption of the Participatory Budgeting System 19 Implementation 24 Challenges 28 Remaining Tasks 29 Teaching Note Chapter 3 Working with Local Residents in Collaborative Arrangements: A Case Study of Urban Revitalization Vol. 4 Project by Seoul Metropolitan Cases in Citizen-Centered Government in South Korea · 35 and Collaborative Governance - David Lee 36 Overview 90 Introduction 39 Urban Revitalization 2025 91 ‌The U-City Project in Songdo, 44 The Changsin-Soongin Project Korea: History of Shift or Failure 51 ‌The Future of Urban Revitalization 2025 95 ‌Can a Smart City Become Smarter 53 Teaching Note Through Citizen Participation? Lessons from Songdo 97 ‌Smart Participation for a Smart City: Success Stories from Around the Globe Chapter 106 Teaching Note 4 Building an Urban Forest through Public-Private-Partnerships: A Case of Seoul Forest Park · 61 Chapter - Sanghee Park 6 62 Overview Revisiting the Government Project 63 ‌Initiated by the Private, Supported Creating Jobs for the Elderly in South by the Public Korea: The Case of Chuncheon · 115 66 ‌Shared Vision, Disagreements on Particulars - Myungjung “MJ” Kwon 71 ‌The Changing Role of the Seoul 116 Case Study Green Trust 116 ‌Part A 74 Teaching Note · Challenges · Fiscal Issues · Inconsistent Eligibility and Screening Processes · On-the-Job Accidents Chapter · Lack of Job Opportunities 5 122 ‌Part B From Smart to Smarter with Citizen · Three Strategies Participation: Lessons from Songdo · The Present Status of the Program U-City Project · 89 126 Teaching Note - Dohyeong Kim Foreword It is well known that the outstanding ‘government administration’ system and bureaucrats play a key role in Korea’s remarkable political and social development. Korea’s development experience after the Korean War is often cited as an exemplary textbook not only in developing countries but also in the developed countries. The purpose of this book is to develop, share, and spread as a module the best administrative system and policy cases of Korea, which can be used as a reference for both domestic and foreign governments and public institutions to improve their administrative capacity. If the existing development policy case modularization project is only theoretical, academic and normative discussion, this modularization project is differentiated in that it has a purpose to develop with emphasis on practical implications and applicability in the policy field. In order to achieve the aforementioned goals, the Center for International Development and Cooperation, at the Korea Institute of Public Administration published ‘Korean Cases in Public Administration for Training and Practices: Overcoming Uncertainties and Obstacles’ in 2018, focusing on lessons learned from policy failures, following the publication of ‘Korean Cases in Public Administration for Training and Practices for Administrative Training and Practice’ in 2017. The common theme of this year’s policy case studies, which is the third year of the modularization project, is a ‘Public Participation in Policymaking Processes ’. Five selected cases care written to examine the roles of citizens and private sectors in policymaking processes in various policy areas including public budgeting, urban revitalization, urban forest building project, U-City project, and job creation programs for the elderly. The selected case studies were prepared by five faculty members who are currently teaching in either public administration or public policy in the U.S. Additional teaching notes are offered as a teaching guideline to those who use the selected cases for their training or academic courses. As in previous studies, good policy cases will be rigorously reviewed and uploaded to ‘Electronic Hallway’ at the University of Washington at Seattle, U.S. for sharing among policy practitioners, academia professionals, and students studying public administration and policy around the world. Hopefully, the case studies of public participation in government innovation will be useful for domestic and foreign policy practitioners as well as academic researchers. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Hyeon-Suk Lyu, Director of Center for International Development and Cooperation for organizing this project. Many thanks and appreciation also go to this project leader, Professor M.J. Moon of Yonsei University and the professors who wrote each case study. December 2019 Seongho Ahn President, Korea Institute of Public Administration CHAPTER 1 Introduction KOREA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Chapter 1 Introduction M. Jae Moon · Yonsei University Chapter 1 - Chapter This is a collection of case studies that highlight the government’s efforts to integrate citizens into policy-making processes as policy targets as well as participants. This means that citizens have become increasingly important not as “policy-takers” Introduction but as policymakers via active participation in policy-making processes. The recent literature on co-production has placed a growing emphasis on the role of citizens in various stages of public policy formulation, including agenda-setting, decision-making, implementation, evaluation, and so on. Considering that previous case studies often highlight the role of government officials, the selected cases have been included to highlight the roles of citizens and the private sector in policy-making processes in various areas including public budgeting, urban revitalization policies, the U-City project, and job-creation programs for the elderly. We believe that the selected cases offer great practical insights to those wishing to strategically and proactively cope with the need for citizen participation and citizen- centered public policy and administration. The selected case studies were prepared by five faculty members who are currently teaching in the fields of either public administration or public policy in the U.S. Additional teaching notes are offered as a guideline to those who wish to use the selected cases in their training or academic courses. As indicated in the following table, the five cases presented here represent a handful of areas, including e-government, inter-agency collaboration, conflict management, regulatory reform, and human resource management (either at the local or national level). 8 Korean Cases in Public Administration for Training and Practice Authors Title Citizen Participation in Local Governance: The Case of Seoul ’s Sun Young Kim Participatory Budgeting System Working with Local Residents in Collaborative Arrangements: A Case David Lee Study of Urban Revitalization Project by Seoul Metropolitan Government in South Korea Building an Urban Forest through Public-Private Partnerships: A Case of Sanghee Park Seoul Forest Park From Smart to Smarter with Citizen Participation: Lessons from Songdo Dohyeong Kim U-City Project Revisiting the Government Project Creating jobs for the Elderly in South Myungjung Kwon Case Study KIPA Korea: The Case of Chuncheon Series 4 The first case study, by Sun Young Kim, is entitled “Citizen Participation in Local Governance: The Case of Seoul’s Participatory Budgeting System.” In the early 2010s, the Seoul Metropolitan Government introduced the Participatory Budgeting System as a means of better reflecting citizens’ preferences and priorities in the city’s budgeting process. Prior to the implementation of this system, budgeting and fiscal management of the government had been carried out in a top-down manner in which decisions were made mostly by a small group of city officials and experts. With the adoption of the Participatory Budgeting System, however, Seoul citizens gained the ability to propose, evaluate, and decide how to allocate a portion of the city’s annual budget. While the system contributed to increased local autonomy and fiscal democracy to some extent, it also suffered from several problems, such as the limited representation and expertise of citizens, intense competition among communities, and conflicts between citizens and administrators. This case study describes the background and implementation process of the Participatory Budgeting System by focusing on the efforts to enhance citizen participation in government affairs. The objective of the case study is to help students identify and analyze potential problems and challenges associated with this system and generate practical recommendations for resolving such difficulties. By successfully Vol. 4 : : Cases in Citizen-Centered and Collaborative Governance 9 completing this case study, students should be able to comprehend both the benefits and drawbacks of engaging citizens in the budgeting process, specifically, and city administration, in general. In addition, students should be expected to critically assess the effectiveness of the Participatory Budgeting System in terms of key public values, such as transparency, accountability, representation, participation, and democracy. The second case, written by David Lee, is entitled “Working with Local Residents in Collaborative Arrangements: A Case Study of Urban Revitalization
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seoul City's Social Innovation Strategy: a Model of Multi-Channel
    Seoul City’s social innovation strategy: A model of multi-channel communication to strengthen governance and citizen engagement. Sunkyung Han, Jungwon Kim, Sojung Rim and AhYoung Park Spreadsi, South Korea Social Frontiers The next edge of social innovation research Social Frontiers Seoul City’s Social Innovation Strategy: 2 a model of multi-channel communication to strengthen govern- ance and citizen engagement Seoul City’s Social Innovation Strategy: a model of multi-channel communication to strengthen governance and citizen engagement Jungwon Kim1, Sunkyung Han, Ahyoung Park and Sojung Rim Abstract Over the past two years, Seoul Metropolitan Government has significantly changed the way it engages with its citizens – moving away from a one-way public communication model towards a system with greater focus on getting citizens more involved in decision-making process. Seoul Metropolitan Government has developed various communication channels that open up two-way dialogue between the city administration and citizens. This research paper explores how these new communication channels are creating a culture, which encourages city administration to engage with citizens who provide information about their needs and help shape new ideas. The research results show that Seoul Metropolitan Government’s multi-channel communication builds shared understanding and trusting relationship among various stakeholders including citizens. It enables them to become partners in co-creating innovative solutions to problems of our society. 1 Introduction Social innovation is gaining considerable interest in public policy discourse all around the world and South Korea is no exception. Ever since a well-known social innovator, Wonsoon Park, be- came the Mayor of Seoul in October 2011, there has been a shift towards a participatory and open dialogue between the Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) and Seoul citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Park & Green Space Policies in Seoul
    Changes in Park & Green Space Policies in Seoul Date 2015-06-25 Category Environment Updater ssunha This report explores the park and green space policies of the Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) by period, from the time Korea opened its ports to the outside world until today. The periods are: modernization and Japanese colonial rule; the first and second republics; the third and fourth republics; the fifth and sixth republics; and local autonomous government administrations elected by popular vote. For each period, this report examines the institutional and spatial changes in urban parks. Modernization & Japanese Colonial Rule: The Dawn of Urban Parks Defining Characteristics: Mountains and valleys serving as parks (Joseon Dynasty); Independence Park (Open-door Period); destruction of cultural heritage (Japanese colonial government) The concept of parks and green spaces as planned facilities was introduced as a byproduct of modernization in the late 19th and early 20th century. Of course there had been places that served as parks and green spaces ever since the Kingdom of Joseon moved its capital to today’s Seoul in 1394. The city is surrounded by an inner ring of 4 mountains and an outer ring of another 4 mountains, with the Han River flowing east to west. During the Joseon Dynasty, the walled city was located to the north of the Han, and the significance of the inner ring of Bugak Mountain, Inwang Mountain, Nak Mountain, and Nam Mountain was profound as the city walls were built on their ridges. Scholars of old would visit nearby mountain valleys where they wrote and recited poems for leisure.
    [Show full text]
  • The By-Election for Seoul Mayor.Pdf
    Game Changer: The By-Election for Seoul Mayor An analysis of the October 26 by-election exit poll The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Woo Jung-Yeop Lisa Collins Many observers claimed that the by-election that took place on October 26 would not only determine the new mayor of Seoul, but would also forecast the results of next year’s presidential election. In order to further analyze the by- election results, the Asan Institute for Policy Studies conducted an exit poll to investigate why and how voters cast their ballots. Previous exit polls only predicted who would win the presidential election. Our survey differs from past exit polls because we examine in detail voters’ rationale for supporting a particular candidate. Using alternative questions and methodology, we believe that our survey results will help shed more light on voters’ behavior and decision making processes. Background on the Seoul Mayoral By-Election In the October 26 by-election, Park Won-soon, an independent candidate and lawyer-turned-activist, defeated Na Kyung-won, a candidate from the ruling Grand National Party (GNP). Park won the election with 53.3 percent of the vote against Na’s 46.3 percent. Korean politics have been on a rollercoaster ride since last August when former Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon staked his position as mayor on the results of a referendum. It began with a battle between Oh and the Seoul City Council. The City Council, which is dominated by opposition party members, decided earlier this year to provide free lunches to all 850,000 elementary and middle school students in Seoul.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Seoul
    SEOUL A Strategy for Urban Resilience 2019 RESILIENT 2019 RESILIENT SEOUL | A Strategy for Urban Resilience 2019 Smart Safe City for All, Seoul A Strategy for Urban Resilience 2019 3 | RESILIENT SEOUL | 1 Photo by An Yeon-soo CONTENTS 01 Introduction 04 02 Executive Summary 08 03 What is Urban Resilience? 10 04 Introducing Seoul 12 05 Seoul in Context 18 06 Seoul’s History of Disasters 20 07 Journey Towards Resilient Seoul 22 08 100RC Network 36 09 Goal 1 Governance- Resilience through Collaboration 38 A Program 1. Safety Governance Strategy Program 2. Smart Safety Net for Program 3. Climate Change Response System Urban Program 4. Proactive Management for Aging Infrastructure Resilience Program 5. Safer Neighborhoods 2019 10 Goal 2 Community- Stronger and Connected Community 66 Program 6. Connected Neighborhood for the Vulnerable Program 7. Stable and Affordable Housing for All Program 8. Childbirth and Childcare Service Program 9. Innovative Solutions in Community 11 Goal 3 Inclusive Growth- Prosperous Seoul for All 80 Program 10. Youth Welfare and Jobs Program 11. Employment Opportunities for the Elderly Program 12. Microbusiness and the Self-employed Program 13. Respect for Labor Program 14. Expansion of Social Economy 12 What’s Next? 104 13 Acknowledgements 106 2 | RESILIENT SEOUL | 3 01 MAYOR'S MESSAGE Park Won Soon Mayor of Seoul More than half of the world’s population resides in natural and social disasters and foster the capacity to urban areas. Not limited to just people, major infra- recover quickly in times of crisis. In 2013, Seoul took structure, including the economy, culture, transporta- part in the Making Cities Resilient campaign of the A Strategy tion, education, and health, are also densely located UNISDR.
    [Show full text]
  • 153-174 Collaboration and Confucian Reflexivity in Local Energy
    Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia Vol. 18, No. 1: 153-174 DOI: 10.17477/jcea.2019.18.1.153 Collaboration and Confucian Reflexivity in Local Energy Governance: The Case of Seoul’s One Less Nuclear Power Plant Initiatives 1 Youhyun Lee 2, Suho Bae3 South Korea's energy policy has been historically established through an energy production structure that relies on thermal and nuclear power generation in relation to a centralized ‘Hard Energy System’. However, climate change issues are forcing the transition to renewable energy, and it is crucial for local governments to enable this. This study analyses Seoul city’s local energy governance, which is known as One Less Nuclear Power Plant Initiative, by applying the collaborative governance framework inspired by Ansell and Gash (2008) and the Reflexivity framework of Confucianism. It is considered that the local energy governance model of Seoul city can be used as a model by other local governments, and it will eventually lead to a decentralized energy system in this era of energy transition. Keywords: Local Energy Governance; Confucian Reflexivity; Collaborative Governance, Energy Decentralization Introduction South Korea (herein referred to as ‘Korea’) has had very conservative-high dependence on nuclear, petroleum and central government leading-in approach to coping with energy transition issues. In addition to becoming the 11th largest global economy (based on International Monetary Fund Stats in 2017), Korea has played a leading role in the green-growth paradigm. However, the current emphasis of the Korean government is more on “growth” than “green” 1 The original draft was first presented in IPPA, 3rd International Conference on Public Policy in Singapore June, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Seoul Field Trip English
    Foreign Student Group Support Programs 03 Seoul City’s Unique Exchange 04 Traditional Culture Exchange 08 Sports Exchange 10 Language Exchange 12 Scenery Dial 120 then 9 and you will hear 14 a message in Korean. ducation (Please choose from the E following languages: English, 19 Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese riginal and Mongolian) O 26 Published Date December 2015 nique Publication Division Tourism U Department of Seoul 31 Publisher Mayor of Seoul Landmark Planning and Production Seoul Tourism organization 39 Design Korean Association for Four Seasons Festivities in Seoul Disabled Culture Contents, Corp. Photo Credit visitseoul.net, and 42 various other contributors Seoul Field Trip Map 44 Foreign Student Group Support Programs The city of Seoul has implemented a project geared towards expanding the activities of Seoul students by making available exchange programs with foreign students on the elementary, middle and high school, and university level. This program has resulted in an increased number of foreign student groups visiting Seoul. Eligibility Foreign student groups of 20 or more visiting Seoul Support Program 1. Information on Exchange Matching 2. Sister Schools Partnership Establishments Support 3. Matching Services for Education Facilities within Seoul 4. Exchange Support for similar majors 5. Provision of guide of culture experience for exchange students 6. Provision of interpretation services and preparation for various events for cultural exchange among students 7. Provision of the Seoul Public Relations Kit (Guide book for Field Trip, Map of Seoul & Notebook) Applications & Inquiries Submit Applications via fax or email FAX. +82-2-3788-0899 E-mail. [email protected] Inquiries. +82-2-3788-0867 or +82-2-3788-8154 Become a Barista Seoul City’s You can become a barista for a day! How about having fun with Unique your friends enjoying coffee each Exchange of you made? Program How’s the coffee I made? Greetings! Brief Encounters, Lifelong Memories Plenty of programs are available for visiting students.
    [Show full text]
  • LUCI AGM Seoul
    #LUCIagmSeoul PROGRAMME Warm greetings from the Seoul Metropolitan Government. I am Wonsoon Park, Mayor of Seoul. It is my great pleasure to be able to invite you to the 2016 LUCI Annual General Meeting in Seoul, the beautiful city of light. The LUCI Annual General Meeting in Seoul will be a meaningful time to get together and share our cities’ urban lighting policies, excellent projects and case studies, and latest technological innovations in order to further develop together. EDITORIALS In addition, we will have a great opportunity to look back on past LUCI events, activities and on-going projects as well as the future perspectives of the network. Once again, I welcome the delegations from abroad to Seoul and I wish you a pleasant and meaningful visit. I hope that you can make many fond memories during your stay here. Wonsoon PARK Mayor of Seoul Metropolitan Government Welcome to the 14th Annual General Meeting of LUCI, the international forum for cities on urban lighting! We have the great pleasure to be back in Asia and hosted by the City of Seoul. This is a unique opportunity to learn how this dynamic and vibrant metropolis of 10 million inhabitants develops and manages its urban lighting strategy, from enhancing cultural heritage, to addressing light pollution, to building a smart city. In this context and rich culture of lighting, participants will be invited to exchange and discuss major issues and trends of the urban lighting community during international panel discussions and open conference sessions. Don’t hesitate to make your voices heard! The LUCI Annual General Meeting 2016 in Seoul will be the perfect moment for our network to set major milestones for its future.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Won-Soon Seoul
    Voice of the Mayors Park Won-Soon Seoul People are the hope Park Won-Soon Voice of the Mayors 1 About Voice of the Mayors Celebrating its thirtieth anniversary, METROPOLIS wishes to leverage the unique experience of its members, represented by the mayors of the major metro- polises, presidents and governors of metropolitan regions. Too often, the expertise of these high-ranking offi cials is lost once their term has come to an end. However, at a time when global urban development is quickening its pace, their experience is more benefi cial than ever for the new generations of local decision-makers, the entire spectrum of public and private local development stakeholders and partners in the international community. In its capacity as a network of the world’s major metropolises, METROPO- LIS also seeks to make an active contribution to the current international debate concerning the revision of the Millennium Development Goals, negotiations on cli- mate change and the preparations for the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III). This is how the idea for Voice of the Mayors came into being, as a wealth of fi rst-hand testimonies from local and regional leaders whose experience deser- ves to be recounted and disseminated. Bequeathing this legacy also conveys the willingess of METROPOLIS members to share their experiences and to enhance the exchange of knowledge, a concerted eff ort to contribute towards shaping sustai- nable urban development worldwide. Upon the creation of METROPOLIS in 1984, the 14 founding members expressed their desire to work together to strengthen their mutual capacities to manage their cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Regeneration Without Demolition: Remaking Sewoon
    case study Regeneration Without Demolition: Remaking Sewoon The area around Sewoon Sangga as seen from above. Source: Seoul Museum of History, http://www.museum.seoul.kr/ content by Seoul’s bold efforts in transforming highways and main roads into public The Seoul Institute spaces for people and its creative rejuvenation of modern heritage were two reasons why it clinched the Lee Kuan Yew World City Prize 2018. The city’s Makercity Sewoon project showcases how top-down and bottom-up approaches helped rehabilitation seven commercial superblocks into a vibrant space for the people. The rise and fall of a commercial hub First built in 1966 as a large-scale remodelling project, Sewoon Sangga (or Sewoon Shopping Mall) connects Jongmyo Shrine and the Nam Mountain. The name commonly refers to the stretch of eight buildings—Hyundai Arcade (currently removed), Sewoon Arcade, Cheonggye Arcade, Dalim Arcade, Sampoong Arcade, Poongjeon Hotel, Shinseong Arcade, and Jinyang Arcade— which are each 8-17 floors high, and together, stretch 1 km from south to north along the street. When first completed, Sewoon Sangga introduced many ground-breaking concepts, including being the country’s first multi-purpose building. Pedestrians and cars were separated on the ground level, and there was a 1 Green Belt Park on the former Hyundai Arcade. Source: Seoul Metropolitan Government (2015), Seoul 2014/2015 Urban Form and Landscape, p. 119 pedestrian deck of continuous shopping malls, and an atrium. It was planned to induce shared growth in a part of the city that had stagnated and was deteriorating. The arcade formed a central commercial hub in Seoul and was known to offer the most luxurious apartments in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Theology of Korean Pentecostalism: Sunbogeum (Pure Gospel) Pentecostalism
    History and theology of Korean pentecostalism: Sunbogeum (pure gospel) pentecostalism History and theology of Korean pentecostalism: Sunbogeum (pure gospel) pentecostalism An attempt to research the history of the largest congregation in church history and the theology of its pastor Yonggi Cho Ig-Jin Kim Uitgeverij Boekencentrum, Zoetermeer This publication is no. 35 in the Mission series (Missiological Research in the Netherlands). Editorial board: Dr. G.J. van Butselaar Dr. Th. van den End Prof.dr. J.A.B. Jongeneel Prof.dr. A.M. Kool Dr. J.J. Visser Cover design Oblong, Jet Frenken ISBN 90 239 1536 4 NUR 712 © 2003 Uitgeverij Boekencentrum, Zoetermeer (The Netherlands) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise – without written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in articles or reviews. MISSION - Missiologisch onderzoek in Nederland / Missiological research in the Netherlands Table of Contents PREFACE LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS GLOSSARY OF KOREAN TERMS WITH CHINESE CHARACTERS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Statement of the Problem 1 1.2. Methodology 4 1.3. Structure of the Study 5 1.4. Sources 5 1.4.1. Primary Sources 6 1.4.2. Secondary Sources 6 1.4.3. General Literature 6 1.5. Terminology 7 PART I. MODERN HISTORY OF KOREA, KOREAN RELIGIONS AND KOREAN CHURCHES AS CONTEXT OF SUNBOGEUM PENTECOSTALISM 2. MODERN HISTORY OF KOREA 8 2.1. Introduction 9 2.2. Choseon Dynasty Opened to the World Powers (1876-1910) 9 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divided Korean Peninsula
    The Divided Korean Peninsula The Divided Korean Peninsula: A Window into Everyday Life By Nicola Seu The Divided Korean Peninsula: A Window into Everyday Life By Nicola Seu This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Nicola Seu All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0649-5 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0649-7 For Cha Hyosun TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 If You Want to Give God a Good Laugh Chapter Two ................................................................................................ 5 Arrival Chapter Three ............................................................................................ 11 Politics Chapter Four .............................................................................................. 15 Football and Korea Chapter Five .............................................................................................. 23 By the Seaside Chapter Six ................................................................................................ 29 Along the Han
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul a Case Study of Seoul GSEF Social Economy Policy Guidebook –Seoul Metropolitan Government
    GSEF Social Economy Policy Guidebook – Seoul Metropolitan Government Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul A Case Study of Seoul GSEF Social Economy Policy Guidebook –Seoul Metropolitan Government Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul A Case Study of Seoul Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul - A Case Study of Seoul GSEF Social Economy Policy Guidebook - Seoul Metropolitan Government Publisher: Global Social Economy Forum (GSEF) Social Economy of Seoul/Karl Polanyi Institute Asia Author: Yeon Ah KIM, Senior Researcher Author: Taein JUNG, Head of Research Executives Seoul’s Social Economy Policy(2011-2015): Achievements and Challenges/Seoul Social Economy Center Author: Eunae LEE, CEO, President Translator: Ju Hea JANG, Translation Cooperative Copyright ⓒ Global Social Economy Forum (GSEF) Design and Layout by desing Gem First published in Seoul, Republic of Korea 2016 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gsef-net.org Global Social Economy Forum Contents Infographics : Social Economy of Seoul 06 Social Economy of Seoul Introduction 13 Social Economy Policy in Korea 16 Local Social Economic Ecosystem Development Project (LSEEDP) 40 Infrastructure for the Social Economy in Seoul 51 List of Acronyms Current Policy Issues Relating to the Seoul Social Economy 61 Outro: the Possibility of a “Seoul Model” 76 CDR: Quebec’s Regional Development Cooperative CBPP: Community Business Promotion Project Bibliography 78 FAC: Framework Act on Cooperatives GSEF: Global Social Economy Forum KoSEA: Korea Social Economy Promotion
    [Show full text]