DOCSLIB.ORG

Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul a Case Study of Seoul GSEF Social Economy Policy Guidebook –Seoul Metropolitan Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul a Case Study of Seoul GSEF Social Economy Policy Guidebook –Seoul Metropolitan Government GSEF Social Economy Policy Guidebook – Seoul Metropolitan Government Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul A Case Study of Seoul GSEF Social Economy Policy Guidebook –Seoul Metropolitan Government Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul A Case Study of Seoul Status of Social Economy Development in Seoul - A Case Study of Seoul GSEF Social Economy Policy Guidebook - Seoul Metropolitan Government Publisher: Global Social Economy Forum (GSEF) Social Economy of Seoul/Karl Polanyi Institute Asia Author: Yeon Ah KIM, Senior Researcher Author: Taein JUNG, Head of Research Executives Seoul’s Social Economy Policy(2011-2015): Achievements and Challenges/Seoul Social Economy Center Author: Eunae LEE, CEO, President Translator: Ju Hea JANG, Translation Cooperative Copyright ⓒ Global Social Economy Forum (GSEF) Design and Layout by desing Gem First published in Seoul, Republic of Korea 2016 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gsef-net.org Global Social Economy Forum Contents Infographics : Social Economy of Seoul 06 Social Economy of Seoul Introduction 13 Social Economy Policy in Korea 16 Local Social Economic Ecosystem Development Project (LSEEDP) 40 Infrastructure for the Social Economy in Seoul 51 List of Acronyms Current Policy Issues Relating to the Seoul Social Economy 61 Outro: the Possibility of a “Seoul Model” 76 CDR: Quebec’s Regional Development Cooperative CBPP: Community Business Promotion Project Bibliography 78 FAC: Framework Act on Cooperatives GSEF: Global Social Economy Forum KoSEA: Korea Social Economy Promotion Agency Seoul’s Social Economy Policy(2011-2015): KPIA: Karl Polanyi Institute Asia Achievements and Challenges MOEL: The Ministry of Employment and Labor MOI: The Ministry of the Interior Background 80 MOSF: The Ministry of Strategy and Finance Seoul’s social economy policy: achievements over the past five years 81 SSEPC: Seoul Social Economy Policy Council LSEEDP: Local Social Economic Ecosystem Development Project Fostering an ecosystem for greater self-sufficiency 84 SEPA: Social Enterprise Promotion Act Enhancing the autonomy and capabilities of the social economy 89 SEZ: Social Economy Zone SCCC: Seoul Cooperative Consulting Centers Developing platforms for solving local problems 92 SCBA: Seoul Community Business Association Leading the creation of the Global Social Economy Forum (GSEF) 94 SRCA: Seoul Regional Cooperative Association SCSC: Seoul Cooperative Support Center Improving the efficiency of fiscal support 95 SCSE: Seoul Council of Social Enterprises Challenges 97 SMG: Seoul Metropolitan Government SSEC: Seoul Social Economy Center SSEN: Seoul Social Economy Network Social Economy of Seoul Social Enterprises Social enterprises Area These are business organizations that produce and distribute goods and services for social reasons, such as delivering social services 605.21Km2 and creating jobs for the vulnerable, and improving the standard of living and the quality of life for local communities. Population 10,297,138 •Social service enterprises: provide social services for the welfare of the marginalized. •Employment-creating enterprises: provide jobs for the marginalized. •Community-contributing enterprises: contribute to local communities by increasing income and creating jobs for locals, and helping to solve local problems. •Mixed-type enterprises: create jobs and provide social services for the marginalized. •Other enterprises: enterprises whose activities have social impact, even though their contributions to employment and social services cannot be easily quantified. Administration: 25 self-governing gu (boroughs), 424 dong (neighborhood units) Cooperatives • Average gu-size: Area 24.2Km2 , Population 413,980 • Average dong-size: Area 1,43Km2 , Population 24,285 These are business organizations that promote the interests of members and contribute to local society by organizing cooperation over the production, sales, distribution, and purchase of goods and services. •General cooperatives: for-profit organizations that are created by 433 2,267 119 five or more incorporators and promote the interests of members. Social enterprises Cooperatives Community •Social cooperatives: cooperatives that are created to carry out business projects for enterprises social causes. Community enterprises 3,000 Social enterprises 2,819 Coperatives These business organizations bring together locals on mobilizing Community enterprises 2,500 various locally available resources so as to generate revenue, Total 2,271 2,267 income, and jobs for locals, solve local issues, and promote the interests of local communities. 2,000 1,772 1,548 •New-type community enterprises: contribute to local communities 1,500 by making use of local human resources (young adults, retirees, 1,007 stay-at-home mothers who used to work in the past), public resources (cultural 1,000 properties such as Confucian schools, abandoned schools, and other tangible and 624 542 intangible assets), and/or technological resources (IT, design, and other unique 341 500 532 technologies). 475 433 433 332 108 374 125 119 •Community enterprises-in-the-making: enterprises capable of evolving into 9 67 16 76 0 community enterprises, and designated by the heads of central government 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 ministries or of local governments. •Distribution community enterprises: enterprises that specialize in the sale and | Annual Growth of the Social Economy in Seoul | distribution of products of other community enterprises (one per metropolitan city or province). Social Economy Networks in Seoul today Seoul, a City with a Burgeoning Social Economy Social economy networks in Seoul today (As of December 2015) Social service Dobong ▲ ▣ Social economy ecosystem groups center for ◆★ 6 boroughs urban renewal ◆ Social economy councils 20 boroughs ● Social economy integrated support centers Nowon Resource recycling, 8 boroughs Gangbuk ●◆▲■ teenager, and ★ Borough social economy support centers ●◆▲ senior care services 3 boroughs ▲ Local self-rehabilitation centers 24 boroughs ■ Social Economy Zones (preliminary) 6 boroughs Eunpyeong ●◆▲ International cooperation on social economy GSEF established in November 2014. Culture-and art-t hemed Seongbuk tourism business model ■●◆▲ 18 participating cities Jungnang 43 participating nongovernmental organizations ◆▲ 3 participating international organizations Over 4,000 attendees Jongno Comprehensive care service Seoul as the first chair city. ◆▲ Dongdaemun business model Seodaemun ▲ ◆▲ ◆ Gangseo Mapo Jung ▲ ▣◆▲ ▲ ■ Seongdong Gwangjin ●▲■ Gangdong ▣◆▲■ ▣◆★▲ Yongsan ◆▲ Yangcheon Yeongdeungpo ▣◆▲ ▣◆▲ Social fashion ecosystem Songpa Dongjak ◆★▲ ▣▲ Gangnam Guro ▲ ●◆▲ Seocho ◆ Gwanak ▲ Geumcheon ■●◆ ●◆▲ Neighborhood-wide childcare Social Economy of Seoul Introduction he Korean social economy has grown at a remarkable pace over T the last few years, attracting attention from around the world. The number of social economy enterprises, of which there were a mere 501 as of the end of 2010, has multiplied exponentially since the enactment of the Framework Act on Cooperatives (FAC) in 2012, reaching 11,421 (including 1,506 certified social enterprises, 8,551 cooperatives, and 1,364 community enterprises) as of the end of 2015. In other words, the social economy in Korea, measured in terms of the number of actors and enterprises involved, has multiplied by over 22 times in less than five years since the Korean government began to provide policy support. If we counted nonprofit corporations and organizations that strive to realize social values through economic activities, such as rehabilitation enterprises, rural community companies, and other enterprises catering to the employment of severely disabled persons, the scope of the social economy would grow even wider. Seoul alone is home to 23.2 percent of all Korean social economy enterprises (260 certified social enterprises, 2,267 cooperatives, and 119 community enterprises, total 2,646 enterprises), leading the development and progress of the social economy nationwide. There may still be those who question the sustainability of this Introduction 013 rapidly growing economy. Nevertheless, the Korean social economy, social economy policy practices of the SMG and the 25 self-governing particularly in Seoul, is attracting increasing attention from the boroughs making up the city, and to assess the environment and issues international community. This is because the explosive growth of the surrounding the social economy in each borough. The goal was to Seoul social economy is one of the rare examples in which a long research and analyze how the social economy model conceived by the tradition of civil solidarity has combined successfully with governmental SMG has been implemented in each borough and to what extent the policy support in a productive synergy. The social economy of Seoul social economy of Seoul has progressed. provides an exemplary case of multi-sectoral partnership, with the This report also summarizes some of the major social economy municipal government and local civil society working closely together policy initiatives in Seoul as well as a section of the results of an throughout the entire process of social economy policy making and opinion poll. It would be a daunting task to provide a comprehensive implementation from policy review to budget preparations. Since and detailed evaluation and analysis of the entire social economy of the early days of adopting its social economy policy, the Seoul Seoul. This study nonetheless provides a helpful overview
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seoul City's Social Innovation Strategy: a Model of Multi-Channel
    Seoul City’s social innovation strategy: A model of multi-channel communication to strengthen governance and citizen engagement. Sunkyung Han, Jungwon Kim, Sojung Rim and AhYoung Park Spreadsi, South Korea Social Frontiers The next edge of social innovation research Social Frontiers Seoul City’s Social Innovation Strategy: 2 a model of multi-channel communication to strengthen govern- ance and citizen engagement Seoul City’s Social Innovation Strategy: a model of multi-channel communication to strengthen governance and citizen engagement Jungwon Kim1, Sunkyung Han, Ahyoung Park and Sojung Rim Abstract Over the past two years, Seoul Metropolitan Government has significantly changed the way it engages with its citizens – moving away from a one-way public communication model towards a system with greater focus on getting citizens more involved in decision-making process. Seoul Metropolitan Government has developed various communication channels that open up two-way dialogue between the city administration and citizens. This research paper explores how these new communication channels are creating a culture, which encourages city administration to engage with citizens who provide information about their needs and help shape new ideas. The research results show that Seoul Metropolitan Government’s multi-channel communication builds shared understanding and trusting relationship among various stakeholders including citizens. It enables them to become partners in co-creating innovative solutions to problems of our society. 1 Introduction Social innovation is gaining considerable interest in public policy discourse all around the world and South Korea is no exception. Ever since a well-known social innovator, Wonsoon Park, be- came the Mayor of Seoul in October 2011, there has been a shift towards a participatory and open dialogue between the Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) and Seoul citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart City, Smart Residents: Seoul's
    While a city’s extensive ICT infrastructure can be a key factor in establishing it as a Smart City, the citizens as users will be the driving force behind the city’s shift to the “Smart” paradigm. CLC researchers Zhou Yimin, May Ee Wong and Koo A Mi discuss how Seoul, under Mayor Park Won-soon, has continued to transform itself into a Smart City by putting citizens at the core of the Smart City development process. Elected in 2011, Mayor Park has taken a consultative approach to governance. His pledge to listen to the people Smart City, Smart Residents: is represented by an interactive “Big Ear” sculpture installed outside Seoul City Hall. Image credit: Seoul Government Seoul’s ‘Smart’ Transformation Accelerates Under Mayor Park South Korea’s capital city, Seoul, has for example, the optimisation of night bus Seoul’s smart efforts predate Mayor Park. made significant strides in its smart city routes through an analysis of citizens’ Since the 1990s, the Seoul government transformation under Mayor Park Won- mobile phone data. has been gradually digitising its information soon, since his election in 2011. Three systems and putting more of its services major programmes under Mayor Park’s Seoul’s latest moves break new online. In recent years, the city of 10 million ‘smart’ strategy stand out — and should ground in the way they link top-down residents has been consistently placed at or be considered by other cities looking to government processes to bottom-up near the top of global smart city rankings. leverage on technology to improve the citizen participation in a dynamic and Internet penetration rate in South Korea is lives of their citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges for Environmentally Sustainable Transport in Seoul
    Challenges for Environmentally Sustainable Transport In Seoul Gyeng Chul Kim* <TABLE OF CONTENTS) I. INTRODUCTION 3. Infrastructure II. OVERVIEW OF TRANSPORTATION IN 4. Technological Innovation SEOUL 5. Quality and Passenger Safety III. BUS SYSTEM REFORM 6. Environmental Concerns and 1. Main Targets of Bus System Passenger Car Reduction Policy Reform IV. ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE BUS 2. New Fare System SYSTEM REFORM i. iNTRODUCTiON Throughout the 1990s, Seoul faced demographic changes that created new transportation demands that the city could no longer respond to. These changes in transportation patterns increased private car use, unorganized bus transportation routes, and travel across longer distances. Buses were once the most widely used mode of transportation, but demographic changes devastated the service. The transportation system was in chaos and urgently needed reform. The traditional method of piecemeal approaches for the bus system reform no longer worked, as evident in the mid-1990s in Korea. Innovative and intensive reorganization strategies, rather than fragmented approaches, were necessary. The Public Transportation Reform is a major step towards sustainable mobility. The key of its success lies in its integrated approach combining organizational measures, innovative technology, infrastructure development, and transport operation. Seoul is one of the rare cities to have implemented such comprehensive reform, in such a short period of time, and working simultaneously * Senior Research Fellow, Director, Department of Urban Transit,
    [Show full text]
  • Seoul Tour+ Vol.5 7 En.Hwp
    Contents For the month of July, Seoul Tour+ introduces chances for cool exhibitions amidst sweltering hot weather in leading arts institutions in Seoul as well as summer fashion trends found in the world’s largest container shopping mall. 1 Special exhibition _ Grévin Museum 1 2 Exhibition _ Fernando Botero (Seoul Arts Center) 2 3 Hallyu experience _ Yido 3 4 Container shopping mall _ Common Ground 4 5 Self-photography studio _ Pencil Point Studio 5 6 Special experience _ Noongam: Café in the dark 6 7 Cultural complex space _ Insadong Maru 7 8 Traditional Market _ Namdaemun Market 8 Special1 Special recommendation _ Seoul Culture Night 9 Special2 Special recommendation _ Seoul Drum Festival 10 2015 Seoul Certification Program for High-Quality Tour Special3 11 Package Grévin Museum 1 Place Grévin Museum Address 23 Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul Phone +82-70-4280-8800 Homepage www.grevinkorea.com Holidays Open 365 days Reservation No reservation required Opening hours 10:00 ~ 19:00 Overview Adults 23,000 won Payment Cash or credit card Person Youths 18,000 won method (including international cards) Fee Children 15,000 won Consult Kim Yun-ho Languages English, Chinese, Japanese Group (+82-70-4280-8821) for groups with available 20 or more persons Grévin Museum, a leading wax museum from Paris, France, opened for the first time in Asia in Seoul! ‣‣ Musée Grévin, with a 133-year history, opened in Seoul City Hall Euljiro Building after establishing itself in Montreal and Prague. ‣‣ Korea’s top location for ‘edutainment’ where various themes of the past, present, history and culture Description of Korea including K-pop and Hallyu, as well as Paris and Seoul, are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Readjustment in the Republic of Korea: a Case Study for Learning Lessons
    LAND READJUSTMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA: A CASE STUDY FOR LEARNING LESSONS Copyright © United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2019 All rights reserved United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) P. O. Box 30030, 00100 Nairobi GPO KENYA Tel: 254-020-7623120 (Central Office) www.unhabitat.org HS Number: HS/013/19E ISBN Number:(Volume) 978-92-1-132834-9 DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers of boundaries, or regarding its economic system or degree of development. The analysis, conclusions, recommendations and views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme, the United Nations, or its Member States. Information contained in this publication is provided without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including, without limitation, warranties of merchantability, fitness for particular purpose and non-infringement. UN-Habitat specifically does not make any warranties or representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any such data. Under no circumstances shall UN-Habitat be liable for any loss, damage, liability or expense incurred or suffered that is claimed to have resulted from the use of this publication, including, without limitation, any fault error, omission with respect thereto. The use of this publication is at the User’s sole risk. Under no circumstances, including, but not limited to negligence, shall UN-Habitat or its affiliates be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages, even if UN-Habitat has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Escaping the City: Hiking Culture in Seoul
    Freeman East Asia Scholarship | Experience Abroad Aaron Rule Escaping the City: Hiking Culture in Seoul Author: Aaron Rule Date: 10-26-2015 Since Seoul is such a densely populated, the people only have to find refuge from the city life in a much more open space. Hangang Park located on the Han River is this space. It is the best example of a park dedicated to it’s people. It is one of the few green areas in all of Seoul. Summary: With Seoul being the second largest Since Koreans work incredibly pressure- metropolitan city by population coming in filled lives consisting 60 hour workweeks at roughly 26 million people, it becomes and some of the most stressful schooling in increasingly difficult to find public space the world, many Koreans want to get out of within the city. Since it is difficult finding the concrete jungle from which they live in spaces within the city, people in Seoul and escape to find nature and experience leave the bustle and stress of urban life and the great outdoors. head to the outskirts of the city. We have found the weekends to be a Seoul is known as a city completely perfect time to get out of the city and hike. Figure 1. Seoul City Skyline surrounded by mountains. These It is a great way to experience a part of mountains have been a significant Korean tradition and current trends to part of Korean tradition and folklore. enjoy nature outside the urban metropolis. The mountains have been referred the Along with a great form of exercise, hiking “Guardians of Seoul” since they provide in Korea holds a great sense of community.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Park & Green Space Policies in Seoul
    Changes in Park & Green Space Policies in Seoul Date 2015-06-25 Category Environment Updater ssunha This report explores the park and green space policies of the Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) by period, from the time Korea opened its ports to the outside world until today. The periods are: modernization and Japanese colonial rule; the first and second republics; the third and fourth republics; the fifth and sixth republics; and local autonomous government administrations elected by popular vote. For each period, this report examines the institutional and spatial changes in urban parks. Modernization & Japanese Colonial Rule: The Dawn of Urban Parks Defining Characteristics: Mountains and valleys serving as parks (Joseon Dynasty); Independence Park (Open-door Period); destruction of cultural heritage (Japanese colonial government) The concept of parks and green spaces as planned facilities was introduced as a byproduct of modernization in the late 19th and early 20th century. Of course there had been places that served as parks and green spaces ever since the Kingdom of Joseon moved its capital to today’s Seoul in 1394. The city is surrounded by an inner ring of 4 mountains and an outer ring of another 4 mountains, with the Han River flowing east to west. During the Joseon Dynasty, the walled city was located to the north of the Han, and the significance of the inner ring of Bugak Mountain, Inwang Mountain, Nak Mountain, and Nam Mountain was profound as the city walls were built on their ridges. Scholars of old would visit nearby mountain valleys where they wrote and recited poems for leisure.
    [Show full text]
  • The By-Election for Seoul Mayor.Pdf
    Game Changer: The By-Election for Seoul Mayor An analysis of the October 26 by-election exit poll The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Woo Jung-Yeop Lisa Collins Many observers claimed that the by-election that took place on October 26 would not only determine the new mayor of Seoul, but would also forecast the results of next year’s presidential election. In order to further analyze the by- election results, the Asan Institute for Policy Studies conducted an exit poll to investigate why and how voters cast their ballots. Previous exit polls only predicted who would win the presidential election. Our survey differs from past exit polls because we examine in detail voters’ rationale for supporting a particular candidate. Using alternative questions and methodology, we believe that our survey results will help shed more light on voters’ behavior and decision making processes. Background on the Seoul Mayoral By-Election In the October 26 by-election, Park Won-soon, an independent candidate and lawyer-turned-activist, defeated Na Kyung-won, a candidate from the ruling Grand National Party (GNP). Park won the election with 53.3 percent of the vote against Na’s 46.3 percent. Korean politics have been on a rollercoaster ride since last August when former Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon staked his position as mayor on the results of a referendum. It began with a battle between Oh and the Seoul City Council. The City Council, which is dominated by opposition party members, decided earlier this year to provide free lunches to all 850,000 elementary and middle school students in Seoul.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Seoul
    SEOUL A Strategy for Urban Resilience 2019 RESILIENT 2019 RESILIENT SEOUL | A Strategy for Urban Resilience 2019 Smart Safe City for All, Seoul A Strategy for Urban Resilience 2019 3 | RESILIENT SEOUL | 1 Photo by An Yeon-soo CONTENTS 01 Introduction 04 02 Executive Summary 08 03 What is Urban Resilience? 10 04 Introducing Seoul 12 05 Seoul in Context 18 06 Seoul’s History of Disasters 20 07 Journey Towards Resilient Seoul 22 08 100RC Network 36 09 Goal 1 Governance- Resilience through Collaboration 38 A Program 1. Safety Governance Strategy Program 2. Smart Safety Net for Program 3. Climate Change Response System Urban Program 4. Proactive Management for Aging Infrastructure Resilience Program 5. Safer Neighborhoods 2019 10 Goal 2 Community- Stronger and Connected Community 66 Program 6. Connected Neighborhood for the Vulnerable Program 7. Stable and Affordable Housing for All Program 8. Childbirth and Childcare Service Program 9. Innovative Solutions in Community 11 Goal 3 Inclusive Growth- Prosperous Seoul for All 80 Program 10. Youth Welfare and Jobs Program 11. Employment Opportunities for the Elderly Program 12. Microbusiness and the Self-employed Program 13. Respect for Labor Program 14. Expansion of Social Economy 12 What’s Next? 104 13 Acknowledgements 106 2 | RESILIENT SEOUL | 3 01 MAYOR'S MESSAGE Park Won Soon Mayor of Seoul More than half of the world’s population resides in natural and social disasters and foster the capacity to urban areas. Not limited to just people, major infra- recover quickly in times of crisis. In 2013, Seoul took structure, including the economy, culture, transporta- part in the Making Cities Resilient campaign of the A Strategy tion, education, and health, are also densely located UNISDR.
    [Show full text]
  • 153-174 Collaboration and Confucian Reflexivity in Local Energy
    Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia Vol. 18, No. 1: 153-174 DOI: 10.17477/jcea.2019.18.1.153 Collaboration and Confucian Reflexivity in Local Energy Governance: The Case of Seoul’s One Less Nuclear Power Plant Initiatives 1 Youhyun Lee 2, Suho Bae3 South Korea's energy policy has been historically established through an energy production structure that relies on thermal and nuclear power generation in relation to a centralized ‘Hard Energy System’. However, climate change issues are forcing the transition to renewable energy, and it is crucial for local governments to enable this. This study analyses Seoul city’s local energy governance, which is known as One Less Nuclear Power Plant Initiative, by applying the collaborative governance framework inspired by Ansell and Gash (2008) and the Reflexivity framework of Confucianism. It is considered that the local energy governance model of Seoul city can be used as a model by other local governments, and it will eventually lead to a decentralized energy system in this era of energy transition. Keywords: Local Energy Governance; Confucian Reflexivity; Collaborative Governance, Energy Decentralization Introduction South Korea (herein referred to as ‘Korea’) has had very conservative-high dependence on nuclear, petroleum and central government leading-in approach to coping with energy transition issues. In addition to becoming the 11th largest global economy (based on International Monetary Fund Stats in 2017), Korea has played a leading role in the green-growth paradigm. However, the current emphasis of the Korean government is more on “growth” than “green” 1 The original draft was first presented in IPPA, 3rd International Conference on Public Policy in Singapore June, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Planning Association Contents
    Korea Planning association contents 03 Message from the President 04 History 07 Organization 15 Research Performance 16 Publications 18 Conferences 20 Education Programs 23 Seminars and Events 29 Scholarships 30 Membership Guideline Message from the President Message from the President President of The Korea Planning Association (KPA) Chang Mu Jung Today, Korea’s urbanization rate has reached 92%. This ranked first on Korea Citation Index (KCI) of National Research means that all human activities in Korea – including political, Foundation of Korea as the publication most cited; and it was social, economic, and cultural, etc. – mostly take place spa- also selected by the Ministry of Education, Science and Tech- tially within the cities; thus, it can be said that the competi- nology in Korea as one of “Korea’s leading journals.” Our English tiveness of the cities is in fact the competitiveness of the publication, The International Journal of Urban Sciences nation. Therefore, in order to promote growth of our nation (IJUS), is published through a world class publisher Routledge. and to solve the problems that may arise along with such It is currently listed on SCOPUS as well as ESCI, and is being growth, we must think and ponder first in terms of urban in- prepared to be listed on SSCI. terest. Our organization is place where city experts gather to mull over societal issues as well as to seek measures to re- Our monthly publication “Urban Information Service” which solve those issues. provides urban planning issues quickly and accurately to Ko- rean readers is a “must-read” for all city planning related pub- Established in 1959, The Korea Planning Association (KPA) is lic employees throughout over 240 regional government an academic research organization with approximately 7,000 offices in Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Seoul, South Korea
    SPONSOR POST-TRAVEL DISCLOSURE FORM o Original o Amendment This form must be completed by an officer of any organization that served as the primary trip sponsor in providing travel expenses or reimbursement for travel expenses to House Members, officers, or employees under House Rule 25, clause 5. A completed copy of the form must be provided to each House Member, officer, or employee who participated on the trip within ten days of their return. You must answer all questions, and check all boxes, on this form for your submission to comply with House rules and the Committee’s travel regulations. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the denial of future requests to sponsor trips and/or subject the current traveler to disciplinary action or a requirement to repay the trip expenses. NOTE: Willful or knowing misrepresentations on this form may be subject to criminal prosecution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1001. 1. Sponsor(s) who paid for the trip: ___________________________________________________________________ 2. Travel Destination(s): ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. Date of Departure: _____________________________ Date of Return: ___________________________________ 4. Name(s) of Traveler(s): ___________________________________________________________________________ Note: You may list more than one traveler on a form only if all information is identical for each person listed. 5. Actual amount of expenses paid on behalf of, or reimbursed to, each individual named in Question 4: Total Other Expenses Total Transportation Total Lodging Total Meal (dollar amount per item Expenses Expenses Expenses and description) Traveler Accompanying Family Member 6. o All expenses connected to the trip were for actual costs incurred and not a per diem or lump sum payment.
    [Show full text]