Zoran Gavrilovski – 50 JT ( TMP ) 2018, #2: Award by Karol Mlynka

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zoran Gavrilovski – 50 JT ( TMP ) 2018, #2: Award by Karol Mlynka ZORAN GAVRILOVSKI – 50 JUBILEE TOURNEY : AWARDS Published in The Macedonian Problemist (TMP ), Special issue № 57a (supplement to issue № 57, September – December 2018) CONTENTS Zoran Gavrilovski – 50 JT ( TMP ) 2018, #2: award by Karol Mlynka ....................................................... 2 Zoran Gavrilovski – 50 JT ( TMP ) 2018, #3: award by Predrag Žuvi ć....................................................... 6 Zoran Gavrilovski – 50 JT ( TMP ) 2018, S#: award by Ji ři Jelinek ........................................................... 13 Zoran Gavrilovski – 50 JT ( TMP ) 2018, H#2: award by Nikola Stolev ................................................... 19 Zoran Gavrilovski – 50 JT ( TMP ) 2018, H#2½-n: award by Hans Gruber ..............................................23 “A Grandmaster of Chess Poetry” (interview), Nova Makedoniya, 25.08.2018 ......................................27 Three selected chess problems of Zoran Gavrilovski .................................................................................28 The best of Macedonia! 31 December 2018 ZORAN GAVRILOVSKI – 50 JT 2018: MATES IN TWO MOVES 1st Prize: № 31, Pavel Murashev PARTICIPANTS A rich complex of themes with changed functions of white moves, Z-(2,3,3)-38, Zagoruiko Barry Barnes – 1; Branislav Djuraševi ć – 2; Boško Milošeski – 3; Vyacheslav Pilchenko – 4* ; (xyz), Barnes (AB) Dombrovskis theme (ABx!), Dombrovskis paradox by secondary threat (Ax!), Le Grand (xAB), Pseudo-Erokhin (CB), exchange of defenses and refutations (xy), Valery Shavyrin – 4* ; Petro Novitsky – 5; Rauf Aliovsadzade – 6*; Petro Novitsky – 6*, 7*; D Mykola Chernyavskyi – 7*, 8, 9*, 10*; Fedor Kapustin – 9*; Evgeny Gavrilov – 10*; Mikhail 3 -mates on 3 adjacent squares (e5, f5, g5), a flight-giving key and a very good construction. nd Croitor – 11; Nagovytsin – 12; Sergey Solokhin – 13; Anton Fedorov – 14*; Aleksandr Sygurov – 2 Prize: № 4, Vyacheslav Pilchenko & Valery Shavyrin 14*; Jozef Burda – 15; Vladimir Sorochan – 16; Givi Mosiashvili – 17; Miroslav Svítek – 18, 19, A masked form of Nowotny theme. Mates on the same square (c4, e4), Zagoruiko 3 x 2 20, 21, 22*; Zoltan Labai – 22*, 23*, 24**, 25**; Vidadi Zamanov – 23*, 24**, 25**, 26*; Salman (after 1... s:a4/ lf6) plus changed mates after 1... de4 and 1... sb4. Z-(3,3,4)-4.10. Javadadze – 24**, 25**; Mark Basisty – 26*, 27*, 28*; Anatoly Vasilenko – 27*, 28*, 29*, 30; rd № Sergey I. Tkachenko – 29*,; Pavel Murashev – 31, 32, 33*; Anatoly Slesarenko – 33*, 34; Dieter 3 Prize: 20, Miroslav Svítek Müller – 35, 36, 37; Valery Kopyl – 38, 39; Živko Janevski – 40, 41; Aleksandr Pankratiev – 42; Change of defensive motifs in 2 phases and 3 variations (Labai type = DM-23-36 ; A – Vasyl Dyachuk – 43, 44*; Vasyl Markovtsy – 44*; Vladimir Kozhakin – 45; Ilija Serafimovi ć – 46. checking, B – creating flight by line interference, C – Schiffmann-I, D – Schiffmann-II, E – stopping a battery pawn, F – direct guard) combined with change of mate in 4 phases (Z-41-14). PRELIMINARY AWARD A minus: a repeated refutation. by Karol Mlynka st № nd № rd № I would like to express my thanks to Zoran Gavrilovski for giving me the opportunity to 1 Hon. Mention: 32 2 Hon. Mention: 34 3 Hon. Mention: 17 judge his Jubilee tourney in the Twomovers section with a free theme. I received 46 originals in Pavel Murashev Anatoly Slesarenko Givi Mosiashvili anonymous form. The quality of the received entries was good. The authors most frequently dealt with themes such as Zagoruiko, Barnes, Bikos, Lender, Dombrovskis, Schiffmann, anti-Schiffmann, le Grand, pseudo-le Grand, Labai, Mosiashvili, Erokhin, Pseudo-Erokhin, Nowotny, anti-Moscow, Rotterdam-Kharkov, Shanshin, Salazar, Surkov- Slesarenko, Arnhem, Pseudo-Burmistrov, Rudenko, Urania, Fleck, Sushkov etc. My great thanks to all contributors, congratulations to the authors of honored compositions and especially to Zoran. 1st Prize: № 31 2nd Prize: № 4 3rd Prize: № 20 Pavel Murashev V. Pilchenko & V. Shavyrin Miroslav Svítek #2 v v v 12+9 #2 * v 10+8 #2 v v v 13+10 1.f4? A (2. Dh3# B, Th3# C) 1...g:f2 2. L:e5# 1.Se7? (2. Sd7# A, 2. Dh2# B) 1... te:g5 x 2. Tf3# 1... se6 2. Ted7# 1...s:e6+/da4 2.D:e6#/L:d6# 1... tg:g5! 1. S:e5? (2. Dd4#) 1...l:d5! 1. Dh3? B (2.f4# A) dc8! 1...g:f2 2. Sd3#! 1. Td2? (2. Sd7# A) lg4! 1... tg:g5 2.f:e4# 1... se6 2. Sf7# 1... l:d5 2. T:d5# 1... te:g5 x 2. Sf5# 1... l:e4 2. Tcd7# 1... da4 2. L:d6# 1...e:f3 y 2. D:f3# 1... le6! 1. S:d6? (2. Dh2# B) db4! #2 * v v v 11+8 #2 * v 9+11 #2 v v v 14+7 1. Da6? (2. Da3#) df8! 1. TTT:e5! (2. Dd4#) 1... l:d5 2. Sd7# A D T 1... da4 2. Sc4# s s S 1...e:f3 y 2. d3# 1...g:f2 2. ee7#! 1... h~/ :f5! x 2. (:)g4# A /? 1... s:a4/ de4/ lf6 1.f8 S? (2. Sf7#) f2! s T 1... sf5/d:d6+ 2.D:f5#/L:d6# s S 1. TTTh3! C (2.f4# A) 1... e6 2. d5# 1.Tc5? (2. Sg4# A, 2. Sd7# B) 2. Dc4#/ L:e4#/ Dc6# 1... :f5 2. g6# l l D TTT S T S t 1... te:g5 x 2.f:e4# 1... :e4, e6 2. f8# 1. :d6! (2. d7# A) d y s x D 1. b3? (2. :f3#) g8! 1... e3 / :f5! 2. g5#/? 1. Se6? (2. Td4#) de4! D 1... s:c6 2. T:c6# 1...l:d5 2. Dh2# B 1... s:f5 2. T:f3# 1...e:f3 y 2. :e5# 1. Te3!? C (2. Sg4# A) se6! s l s t 1...da4 2. Tb6# 1... :a4/ f6/ b4 1.f8 D? (2. Sf7#) f2! 1... g:g5 2.f:e4# 1... s:f5 x /d:e5 z/d:e3 1.. .d:d6 +/s:e 6+ 2. L:d6# /D:e6 # 2. Se7#/ Sf4#/ S:c7# 1... ld6+ A 2. D:d6# 2. Sd7# B /L:e5#/ Dg5# 1. SSSc2! (2. Td4#) 1... le5 B 2. D:e5# st № 1. D:f4? (2. Sd7# B) de3! y 1 Honourable Mention: 32 , Pavel Murashev 1... s:a4 2.c4# [2. Dc4+?] 1... s:f5 C 2. D:f5# Very interesting strategy with multiple themes: Reversal II (x2), Schiffmann-I (x3), anti- 1... s:f5 x /d:e5 z /da7 d L 1. TTTb4! (2.e5#) 2. D:f5#/ D:e5#/ Dg5# 1... e4 2.d:e4# [2. :e4+?] Schiffmann (x 2), fragmental 3-fold change of 2 mates (3 х 2 in 4 phases: x-xy-y-xy). Z-(1,2,1,2)-26. l S 1... ld6 D 2. D:d6# 1. SSSe7! (2. Sd7# B) 1... f6 2. c:e3# l D 2nd Honourable Mention: № 34 , Anatoly Slesarenko s S 1... e5 E 2. :e5# 1... s:f5 x/d:e5 z/k:e5/ da7 1... b4 2. :b4# 1... s:f5 F 2.e:f5# A classical Zagoruiko (set, try, solution) with extra mate change in form of switchbacks is 2. Sg4# A/ T:h6#/Te3# C/Dg7# 1... sc4+ 2.d:c4# 1... sb6 2. D:c7# nice but well known. The try is better. Z-32-26. Compare to A1 and A2 in the Appendix. 2 Zoran Gavrilovski - 50 Jubilee Tourney 2018: Award in the #2 section The Macedonian Problemist № 57 a (September – December 2018) 3 3rd Honourable Mention: № 17 , Givi Mosiashvili Commendation : № 28 Commendation: № 43 Barnes theme, Dombrovskis and Zagoruiko. A synthesis of Mosiashvili theme with Mark Basisty & Vasyl Dyachuk le Grand. Z-32-26 . In recent times, some authors have explored many similar thematic Anatoly Vasilenko combinations. Special Hon. Mention : № 22 Commendation : № 33 Commenda tion: № 44 Zoltan Labai & Pavel Murashev & Vasyl Dyachuk & Miroslav Svítek Anatoly Slesarenko Vasyl Markovtsy #2 * v 8+4 #2 v v v v 9+8 1... k:e4 2. Lg2# C 1. De8? (2. De3# ) t S 1. Te6? A (2. D:d6# B) 1... c~ 2. (:)c4# t t T 1... kc6 x 2. Lg2# C 1... e5, d3 2. (:)d3# 1... t:c3! v v v v v 1... sce4 y 2. Te5# D #2 * 13+8 #2 9+9 #2 9+8 1.c4? (2. Dc3#) 1... tb6 2. T:c5# l 1... t:c4 2. S:c4# 1... f3 2.e3# 1. L:f3? A (2. L:e4#) 1.Kc2? (2.Te3# A, 2.Lb7# B) s 1... d7! 1... te5, td3 2. T(:)d3# 1... sd8~ 2. S:e6# 1... l:f3 x 2. Dd4# B# 1... dc4+ x 2. T:c4# C 1. LLLg2! C (2. Te5# D) 1... td4 2. D:d4# 1. Dc1? (2.d3# A) 1... sf6! 1... l:d3+ y 2.B:d3# 1... kc6 x 2. Te6# A 1...c1 d(t)! 1... db6 2.d4# B 1. Sg:f3? (2. Dd4# B) 1...c4! 1... sc:e4 y 2. D:d6# B 1.e3? A (2.Tg2# B, 2.Dh2+? D) k D 1... l:f3 x 2.Th5# [L:f3?? A] 1... :e4 2. :c4# 1. TTTc4! C (zugzwang) 1... tf5, tg5, td4 2.D(:)d4# 1...d:c5 2. T:d7# [Le6+? C] 1...c3! 1...d:c4 x 2. Te3# A 1...c1 s 2. Sb1# 1... lf5! y 1. LLLc1! (2.d4# B) 1... l:d3 b 2. Lb7# B 1... te5! 1. L:d7? (2. Le6# C) 1... t:b3 2.d3# A 1... k:d3 2. T:d4# 1.e4? C (2.Dh2# D, 2.Tg2+? B) 1... lf5 y 2. Dd4# B 1... ke5 2. S:g6# 1... l~ 2. D(:)e2# 1... t:c3 2. D:c3# 1...f2! t T 1... s5~ 2. D(:)f3# 1... d3 2. g2# B 1. SSSd:f3! (2. Dd4# B) 1... th5 2. Dd4# 1... s7~ 2. D(:)f5# 1..
Recommended publications
  • B. G. Laws: the Artistry of the Chess Problem (1923)
    The Artistry of the Chess Problem with special reference to the beauties of the three- and four-mover by B. G. Laws [ 1923 ] An Electronic Edition Anders Thulin, Malmö 2008-04-12 NOTES TO ELECTRONIC EDITION The main change in this edition is the use of modern algebraic nota- tion, using the letter ‘S’ to represent the knight. The notation used in the original is a mixture between algebraic and descriptive. All problems have been computer tested – any inadvertencies have been documented in brackets in the solutions. Some minor notation mixups have been silently corrected. The obvious misprint of a white Queen instead of a white Rook on d2 in the Geyerstam three-mover has also been corrected, as well as the name of the creator of the Indian problem, which was given as Rev. C. Loveday. One oddity was discovered during testing. The Chocholouš four- mover lacks a solution: it turns out that it appears here in a different form than that it was originally given. The reason for the change is not known. The original form is as follows: cuuuuuuuuCG. Chocholouš {WDWDWDKD} {hWDWDWHW} {WDWDWDWD} {DPDWiW0N} {WDWDWDW)} {DnDQDWDW} {W4WDWDWD} {DWDWDWDW} vllllllllVMate in four BEAUTY IN THE THREE-MOVER By B. G. Laws In considering the Chess Problem with a view to appreciating its qual- ities, three essentials must be borne in mind: difficulty, idea and con- struction. Each of these is complementary of the others. Difficulty is placed first mainly for the purpose of disposing of that subject before dealing with the other two. It can hardly be suggested that there is beauty in this quality considered alone; but the causes which create this feature may be beautiful, such as the latent chess truth being ob- scured by skilful deployment of the men.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Triple Loyd
    TTHHEE PPUUZZZZLLIINNGG SSIIDDEE OOFF CCHHEESSSS Jeff Coakley TRIPLE LOYDS: BLACK PIECES number 11 September 22, 2012 The “triple loyd” is a puzzle that appears every few weeks on The Puzzling Side of Chess. It is named after Sam Loyd, the American chess composer who published the prototype in 1866. In this column, we feature positions that include black pieces. A triple loyd is three puzzles in one. In each part, your task is to place the black king on the board.to achieve a certain goal. Triple Loyd 07 w________w áKdwdwdwd] àdwdwdwdw] ßwdwdw$wd] ÞdwdRdwdw] Ýwdwdwdwd] Üdwdwdwdw] Ûwdwdpdwd] Údwdwdwdw] wÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈw Place the black king on the board so that: A. Black is in checkmate. B. Black is in stalemate. C. White has a mate in 1. For triple loyds 1-6 and additional information on Sam Loyd, see columns 1 and 5 in the archives. As you probably noticed from the first puzzle, finding the stalemate (part B) can be easy if Black has any mobile pieces. The black king must be placed to take away their moves. Triple Loyd 08 w________w áwdwdBdwd] àdwdRdwdw] ßwdwdwdwd] Þdwdwdwdw] Ýwdw0Ndwd] ÜdwdPhwdw] ÛwdwGwdwd] Údwdw$wdK] wÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈw Place the black king on the board so that: A. Black is in checkmate. B. Black is in stalemate. C. White has a mate in 1. The next triple loyd sets a record of sorts. It contains thirty-one pieces. Only the black king is missing. Triple Loyd 09 w________w árhbdwdwH] àgpdpdw0w] ßqdp!w0B0] Þ0ndw0PdN] ÝPdw4Pdwd] ÜdRdPdwdP] Ûw)PdwGPd] ÚdwdwIwdR] wÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈw Place the black king on the board so that: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Weltenfern a Commented Selection of Some of My Works Containing 149 Originals
    Weltenfern A commented selection of some of my works containing 149 originals by Siegfried Hornecker Dedicated to the memory of Dan Meinking and Milan Velimirovi ć who both encouraged me to write a book! Weltenfern : German for other-worldly , literally distant from the world , describing a person’s attitude In the opinion of the author the perfect state of mind to compose chess problems. - 1 - Index 1 – Weltenfern 2 – Index 3 – Legal Information 4 – Preface 6 – 20 ideas and themes 6 – Chapter One: A first walk in the park 8 – Chapter Two: Schachstrategie 9 – Chapter Three: An anticipated study 11 – Chapter Four: Sleepless nights, or how pain was turned into beauty 13 – Chapter Five: Knightmares 15 – Chapter Six: Saavedra 17 – Chapter Seven: Volpert, Zatulovskaya and an incredible pawn endgame 21 – Chapter Eight: My home is my castle, but I can’t castle 27 – Intermezzo: Orthodox problems 31 – Chapter Nine: Cooperation 35 – Chapter Ten: Flourish, Knightingale 38 – Chapter Eleven: Endgames 42 – Chapter Twelve: MatPlus 53 – Chapter 13: Problem Paradise and NONA 56 – Chapter 14: Knight Rush 62 – Chapter 15: An idea of symmetry and an Indian mystery 67 – Information: Logic and purity of aim (economy of aim) 72 – Chapter 16: Make the piece go away 77 – Chapter 17: Failure of the attack and the romantic chess as we knew it 82 – Chapter 18: Positional draw (what is it, anyway?) 86 – Chapter 19: Battle for the promotion 91 – Chapter 20: Book Ends 93 – Dessert: Heterodox problems 97 – Appendix: The simple things in life 148 – Epilogue 149 – Thanks 150 – Author index 152 – Bibliography 154 – License - 2 - Legal Information Partial reprint only with permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Award -...CHESSPROBLEMS.CA
    ...CHESSPROBLEMS.CA Contents . ISSUE 14 (JULY 2018) 1 Originals 667 2018 Informal Tourney....... 667 Hors Concours............ 673 2 ChessProblems.ca Bulletin TT6 Award 674 3 Articles 678 Arno T¨ungler:Series-mover Artists: Manfred Rittirsch....... 678 Andreas Thoma:¥ Proca variations with e1 and e3...... 681 Jeff Coakley & Andrey Frolkin: Four Rebuses For The Bulletin 684 Arno T¨ungler:Record Breakers VI. 693 Adrian Storisteanu: Lab Notes........... 695 4 Last Page 699 Pauly's Comet............ 699 Editor: Cornel Pacurar Collaborators: Elke Rehder, . Adrian Storisteanu, Arno T¨ungler Originals: [email protected] Articles: [email protected] Correspondence: [email protected] Rook Endgame III ISSN 2292-8324 [Mixed technique on paper, c Elke Rehder, http://www.elke-rehder.de. Reproduced with permission.] ChessProblems.ca Bulletin IIssue 14I ..... ORIGINALS 2018 Informal Tourney T369 T366 T367 T368 Rom´eoBedoni ChessProblems.ca's annual Informal Tourney V´aclavKotˇeˇsovec V´aclavKotˇeˇsovec V´aclavKotˇeˇsovec S´ebastienLuce is open for series-movers of any type and with ¥ any fairy conditions and pieces. Hors concours mp% compositions (any genre) are also welcome! Send to: [email protected]. |£#% 2018 Judge: Manfred Rittirsch (DEU) p4 2018 Tourney Participants: # 1. Alberto Armeni (ITA) 2. Erich Bartel (DEU) C+ (1+5)ser-h#13 C+ (6+2)ser-!=17 C+ (5+2)ser-!=18 C- (1+16)ser-=67 3. Rom´eoBedoni (FRA) No white king Madrasi Madrasi Frankfurt Chess 4. Geoff Foster (AUS) p| p my = Grasshopper = Grasshopper = Nightrider No white king 5. Gunter Jordan (DEU) 4 my % = Leo = Nightrider = Nightriderhopper Royal pawn d6 ´ 6. LuboˇsKekely (SVK) 2 solutions 2 solutions 2 solutions 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Brilliant Mates in Moscow by IM Yochanan Afek
    Chess Today is happy to present an article on composition by one of our readers – IM Yochanan Afek (left, photo by Cathy Rogers). This article was first published in Chess Today No. 1069 and 1070 (October 2003). Brilliant Mates in Moscow by IM Yochanan Afek, "Problems and games are two equal aspects of chess", wrote once Dr. Milan Vukcevich, the great American composer who passed away earlier this year and who was also a very strong over-the-board master. Obviously he did not refer by that to the number of people involved but rather to the injustice frequently done to this fine art, by too many players who tend to consider it as a waste of time for the purpose of improving one's playing skills. "Relative to the game", he explains, "a good chess problem activates more force per move, uses pieces more efficiently and stresses more their cooperation and interference with each other. A good problem may combine a dozen separate elements into one extraordinary event, in the same way in which a good novel may condense a dozen real lives into a single lifetime of its fictitious hero..." — food for the thought... Not everyone knows that within the immense world of chess, a smaller, yet a highly motivated and constantly growing community of problems and studies fans has developed over the years, organizing a variety of composing and solving events, publishing dozens of books and magazines, awarding official FIDE titles and even holding an annual congress. All this worldwide intensive activity is done voluntarily and winning dozens of prestigious awards definitely will not make one any richer as the prize money, if any, is usually rather modest.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 123 - (Vol.VIH)
    No. 123 - (Vol.VIH) January 1997 Editorial Board editors John Roycrqfttf New Way Road, London, England NW9 6PL Edvande Gevel Binnen de Veste 36, 3811 PH Amersfoort, The Netherlands Spotlight-column: J. Heck, Neuer Weg 110, D-47803 Krefeld, Germany Opinions-column: A. Pallier, La Mouziniere, 85190 La Genetouze, France Treasurer: J. de Boer, Zevenenderdrffi 40, 1251 RC Laren, The Netherlands EDITORIAL achievement, recorded only in a scientific journal, "The chess study is close to the chess game was not widely noticed. It was left to the dis- because both study and game obey the same coveries by Ken Thompson of Bell Laboratories rules." This has long been an argument used to in New Jersey, beginning in 1983, to put the boot persuade players to look at studies. Most players m. prefer studies to problems anyway, and readily Aside from a few upsets to endgame theory, the give the affinity with the game as the reason for set of 'total information' 5-raan endgame their preference. Your editor has fought a long databases that Thompson generated over the next battle to maintain the literal truth of that ar- decade demonstrated that several other endings gument. It was one of several motivations in might require well over 50 moves to win. These writing the final chapter of Test Tube Chess discoveries arrived an the scene too fast for FIDE (1972), in which the Laws are separated into to cope with by listing exceptions - which was the BMR (Board+Men+Rules) elements, and G first expedient. Then in 1991 Lewis Stiller and (Game) elements, with studies firmly identified Noam Elkies using a Connection Machine with the BMR realm and not in the G realm.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Encode Heterodox Chess Symbols in the UCS Source: Garth Wallace Status: Individual Contribution Date: 2016-10-25
    Title: Proposal to Encode Heterodox Chess Symbols in the UCS Source: Garth Wallace Status: Individual Contribution Date: 2016-10-25 Introduction The UCS contains symbols for the game of chess in the Miscellaneous Symbols block. These are used in figurine notation, a common variation on algebraic notation in which pieces are represented in running text using the same symbols as are found in diagrams. While the symbols already encoded in Unicode are sufficient for use in the orthodox game, they are insufficient for many chess problems and variant games, which make use of extended sets. 1. Fairy chess problems The presentation of chess positions as puzzles to be solved predates the existence of the modern game, dating back to the mansūbāt composed for shatranj, the Muslim predecessor of chess. In modern chess problems, a position is provided along with a stipulation such as “white to move and mate in two”, and the solver is tasked with finding a move (called a “key”) that satisfies the stipulation regardless of a hypothetical opposing player’s moves in response. These solutions are given in the same notation as lines of play in over-the-board games: typically algebraic notation, using abbreviations for the names of pieces, or figurine algebraic notation. Problem composers have not limited themselves to the materials of the conventional game, but have experimented with different board sizes and geometries, altered rules, goals other than checkmate, and different pieces. Problems that diverge from the standard game comprise a genre called “fairy chess”. Thomas Rayner Dawson, known as the “father of fairy chess”, pop- ularized the genre in the early 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Birth of the Chess Queen C Marilyn Yalom for Irv, Who Introduced Me to Chess and Other Wonders Contents
    A History Birth of the Chess Queen C Marilyn Yalom For Irv, who introduced me to chess and other wonders Contents Acknowledgments viii Introduction xii Selected Rulers of the Period xx part 1 • the mystery of the chess queen’ s birth One Chess Before the Chess Queen 3 Two Enter the Queen! 15 Three The Chess Queen Shows Her Face 29 part 2 • spain, italy, and germany Four Chess and Queenship in Christian Spain 39 Five Chess Moralities in Italy and Germany 59 part 3 • france and england Six Chess Goes to France and England 71 v • contents Seven Chess and the Cult of the Virgin Mary 95 Eight Chess and the Cult of Love 109 part 4 • scandinavia and russia Nine Nordic Queens, On and Off the Board 131 Ten Chess and Women in Old Russia 151 part 5 • power to the queen Eleven New Chess and Isabella of Castile 167 Twelve The Rise of “Queen’s Chess” 187 Thirteen The Decline of Women Players 199 Epilogue 207 Notes 211 Index 225 About the Author Praise Other Books by Marilyn Yalom Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher Waking Piece The world dreams in chess Kibitzing like lovers Pawn’s queened redemption L is a forked path only horses lead. Rook and King castling for safety Bishop boasting of crossways slide. Echo of Orbit: starless squared sky. She alone moves where she chooses. Protecting helpless monarch, her bidden skill. Attacking schemers, plotters, blundered all. Game eternal. War breaks. She enters. Check mate. Hail Queen. How we crave Her majesty. —Gary Glazner Acknowledgments This book would not have been possible without the vast philo- logical, archaeological, literary, and art historical research of pre- vious writers, most notably from Germany and England.
    [Show full text]
  • The 5Th Belgrade Chess Problems Festival Report by Milan Velimirović the Fifth Successive Festival Took Place from 2Nd to 4Th of May 2008
    Mat Plus Review Summer 2008 The 5th Belgrade Chess Problems Festival Report by Milan Velimirović The fifth successive Festival took place from 2nd to 4th of May 2008. As usual a good number of guests from abroad were welcomed: Dinu-Ioan Nicula (ROM), Aleksander Leontyev (RUS), Andrey Selivanov (RUS), Eric Huber (ROM), Fadil Abdurahmanović (BIH), Iļja Ketris (LAT), Ivan Denkovski (MAK), Kostas Prentos (GRE), Michal Dragoun (CZE), Piotr Murdzia (POL), Valery Kopyl with his lovely daughter Valeria (UKR) and Živko Janevski (MAK). You may have noticed the exception from the alphabetical order of that list, but there is a good reason for it: Dinu-Ioan Nicula is the only foreign composer who has attended all five Festivals, and if he comes again next year the organizers could consider the idea of promoting him into an honorary participant. Anyway, all guests have been treated by the home team in a traditionally warm and friendly way. For the record, the participants from Serbia were: Bogoljub Trifunović, Borislav Gađanski, Borislav Ilinčić, Božidar Brujić, Božidar Šoškić, Branislav Đurašević, Darko Šaljić, Dragoljub Đokić, Goran Janković, Goran M. Todorović, Goran Škare, Igor Spirić, Joza Tucakov, Marjan Kovačević, Mihajlo Milanović, Milan Velimirović, Miodrag Radomirović, Mirko Miljanić, Nikola Miljaković, Nikola Petković, Petar Opening speech: Milan Milićević, president Šoškić, Radomir Mićunović, Slobodan of Chess club “Beograd Beopublikum”, Šaletić, Stevan B. Bokan, Tomislav Petrović, accompanied by Marjan Kovačević Vladimir Podinić and Zoran Sibinović. The programme was very busy and here is a brief report of all the events. Friday, May 2nd, 16:00. All participants were allowed to take part in a Machine Gun Solving event.
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to SCHOLASTIC CHESS (11Th Edition Revised June 26, 2021)
    A GUIDE TO SCHOLASTIC CHESS (11th Edition Revised June 26, 2021) PREFACE Dear Administrator, Teacher, or Coach This guide was created to help teachers and scholastic chess organizers who wish to begin, improve, or strengthen their school chess program. It covers how to organize a school chess club, run tournaments, keep interest high, and generate administrative, school district, parental and public support. I would like to thank the United States Chess Federation Club Development Committee, especially former Chairman Randy Siebert, for allowing us to use the framework of The Guide to a Successful Chess Club (1985) as a basis for this book. In addition, I want to thank FIDE Master Tom Brownscombe (NV), National Tournament Director, and the United States Chess Federation (US Chess) for their continuing help in the preparation of this publication. Scholastic chess, under the guidance of US Chess, has greatly expanded and made it possible for the wide distribution of this Guide. I look forward to working with them on many projects in the future. The following scholastic organizers reviewed various editions of this work and made many suggestions, which have been included. Thanks go to Jay Blem (CA), Leo Cotter (CA), Stephan Dann (MA), Bob Fischer (IN), Doug Meux (NM), Andy Nowak (NM), Andrew Smith (CA), Brian Bugbee (NY), WIM Beatriz Marinello (NY), WIM Alexey Root (TX), Ernest Schlich (VA), Tim Just (IL), Karis Bellisario and many others too numerous to mention. Finally, a special thanks to my wife, Susan, who has been patient and understanding. Dewain R. Barber Technical Editor: Tim Just (Author of My Opponent is Eating a Doughnut and Just Law; Editor 5th, 6th and 7th editions of the Official Rules of Chess).
    [Show full text]
  • No Slide Title
    112 CONTENTS StrateGems 2011 h#n Award………………………………………. 58 Danka Petkova-90MT Award……………………………………… 59 Repeat the Sounding Joy……………………………………………63 The quest for a King-only proof game…….………………………. 66 Recently Honored US Compositions ……………………….……... 69 Original compositions and SG53 solutions……………………...… 71 StrateGems StrateGems Solving Ladder 2011, Leg 26 ………………...……… 93 StrateGems 2011 Solving Championship………………………….. 95 Four of a Kind……………………………………………………… 95 Petko A. Petkov Jubilee Tourney Award (PAP-70JT)…………….. 96 Recent Tourney Winners……………………………..……………. 103 2012 StrateGems Books Library ................................................................111 EDITORS Chief Editor: Mike Prcic, 2613 Northshore Lane, Westlake Village, CA 91361-3318, [email protected] #2 Editor: Aaron Hirschenson 6 Nizana Street, Metar 85025, Israel, [email protected] #3 Editor: Rauf Aliovsadzade 5600 Randolph St. Lincoln, NE 68510, [email protected] #n Editor: Richard Becker 510 Pleasant Ave. Oregon City, OR, 97045, [email protected] Studies Editor: Franjo Vrabec Blåkullagatan 31C, 25457 Helsingborg, Sweden, [email protected] Helpmates Editor: Nikola Stolev Buković 3a, n. Lisice, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia, [email protected] Series-Movers and Stalemates Editor: Radovan Tomašević Djure Salaja 19b/4, SRB-19000 Zajecar, Serbia, [email protected] Selfmates and Fairies Editor: Petko A. Petkov Janko Sakazov N 38, whod W, 1504-Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] nN Retros and Proof Games Editor: Kostas Prentos Kleanthous 23, GR-54453 Thessaloniki, Greece, [email protected] Solutions Editor: Danny Dunn 6717 Lahontan, Ft. Worth, TX 76132, [email protected] Consultant: Dan Meinking; StrateGems Web site: www.Strategems.org Language Editor: Virginia Prcic, Contributor: Bob Lincoln SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION StrateGems. U.S. subscribers $35 per year. Other countries $40. Good Companions Fellow $50.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: Pending Post Tracking No
    As of: January 02, 2020 Received: December 20, 2019 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k3-9dz4-mt2u Comments Due: January 10, 2020 Submission Type: Web Docket: PTO-C-2019-0038 Request for Comments on Intellectual Property Protection for Artificial Intelligence Innovation Comment On: PTO-C-2019-0038-0002 Intellectual Property Protection for Artificial Intelligence Innovation Document: PTO-C-2019-0038-DRAFT-0009 Comment on FR Doc # 2019-26104 Submitter Information Name: Yale Robinson Address: 505 Pleasant Street Apartment 103 Malden, MA, 02148 Email: [email protected] General Comment In the attached PDF document, I describe the history of chess puzzle composition with a focus on three intellectual property issues that determine whether a chess composition is considered eligible for publication in a magazine or tournament award: (1) having one unique solution; (2) not being anticipated, and (3) not being submitted simultaneously for two different publications. The process of composing a chess endgame study using computer analysis tools, including endgame tablebases, is cited as an example of the partnership between an AI device and a human creator. I conclude with a suggestion to distinguish creative value from financial profit in evaluating IP issues in AI inventions, based on the fact that most chess puzzle composers follow IP conventions despite lacking any expectation of financial profit. Attachments Letter to USPTO on AI and Chess Puzzle Composition 35 - Robinson second submission - PTO-C-2019-0038-DRAFT-0009.html[3/11/2020 9:29:01 PM] December 20, 2019 From: Yale Yechiel N. Robinson, Esq. 505 Pleasant Street #103 Malden, MA 02148 Email: [email protected] To: Andrei Iancu Director of the U.S.
    [Show full text]