DOCSLIB.ORG

Growth of Legionella Pneumophila Inacanthamoeba Castellanii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Growth of Legionella Pneumophila Inacanthamoeba Castellanii INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, Aug. 1994, p. 3254-3261 Vol. 62, No. 8 0019-9567/94/$04.00+0 Copyright C 1994, American Society for Microbiology Growth of Legionella pneumophila in Acanthamoeba castellanii Enhances Invasion JEFFREY D. CIRILLO, STANLEY FALKOW, AND LUCY S. TOMPKINS* Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Califomia 94305 Received 4 March 1994/Returned for modification 12 April 1994/Accepted 29 April 1994 Legionella pneumophila is considered to be a facultative intracellular parasite. Therefore, the ability of these bacteria to enter, i.e., invade, eukaryotic cells is expected to be a key pathogenic determinant. We compared the invasive ability of bacteria grown under standard laboratory conditions with that of bacteria grown in Acanthamoeba castellanii, one of the protozoan species that serves as a natural host for L. pneumophila in the environment. Amoeba-grown L. pneumophila cells were found to be at least 100-fold more invasive for epithelial cells and 10-fold more invasive for macrophages and A. castellanii than were L. pneumophila cells grown on agar. Comparison of agar- and amoeba-grown L. pneumophila cells by light and electron microscopy demonstrated dramatic differences in the morphology and structure of the bacteria. Analyses of protein expression in the two strains of bacteria suggest that these phenotypic differences may be due to the expression of new proteins in amoeba-grown L. pneumophila cells. In addition, the amoeba-grown bacteria were found to enter macrophages via coiling phagocytosis at a higher frequency than agar-grown bacteria did. Replication of L. pneumophila in protozoans present in domestic water supplies may be necessary to produce bacteria that are competent to enter mammalian cells and produce human disease. Legionella pneumophila is the causative agent of the poten- sols from these contaminated sources (2, 3, 18). Furthermore, tially lethal pneumonia commonly known as Legionnaires' it has been amply shown that multiple passage of fresh clinical disease (13, 31). It is estimated that 6.1 cases of Legionella isolates of L. pneumophila on agar causes a loss of virulence as infection occur for every 100,000 adults annually in the United measured by the ability to replicate in tissue culture cells and States alone (28). Often the mortality rate of Legionnaires' cause pneumonitis in guinea pigs (4, 8, 30). This evidence may disease is greater than 25% (14, 27). L. pneumophila is thought indicate that there is an important link between Legionnaires' to replicate intracellularly in humans (6, 47) and has been disease and protozoans present in domestic water supplies. demonstrated to grow extracellularly only under laboratory These observations led us to examine the effects upon conditions (7). The cell types that L. pneumophila has been invasion of growth of L. pneumophila in one of its environ- shown to enter and replicate within include epithelial cells (5, mental hosts, Acanthamoeba castellanii (18, 40). Previous 37), macrophages (20, 26), fibroblasts (37, 48), and a number studies in our laboratory have shown that Legionella cells of protozoan species (11, 35, 40, 43). However, in human replicate efficiently within A. castellanii (35). In the current infections (47) as well as the guinea pig model of L. pneumo- study, we examined L. pneumophila cells grown on laboratory phila pneumonitis (6), the majority of bacteria are seen media (BCYE grown [BG]) and in the amoebae (amoeba intracellularly in macrophages. grown [AG]) for their ability to enter a number of cell types, Although entry into host cells is likely to be a critical step in including epithelial cells (HEp-2), macrophages (RAW 264.7 Legionella pathogenesis, little is understood concerning the and THP-1), and amoebae (A. castellanii). The ultrastructure, mechanisms involved. The initial studies on the Legionella morphology, and protein expression of AG and BG bacteria entry mechanisms were carried out with macrophages in vitro were compared. These results further support a role for (19). This work led to the observation that entry may occur protozoans in the production of Legionnaires' disease and through a complement-mediated mechanism involving com- have significant implications for studies on Legionella patho- plement receptors (38). In addition, phagocytosis was shown to genesis. occur through a novel mechanism termed "coiling phagocyto- sis" (19). The possibility that other cell types, particularly epithelial cells, are involved in Legionella pathogenesis has MATERIALS AND METHODS been suggested recently (24, The entry 33). mechanism of into Strains and A epithelial cells has not been studied, although they have been growth conditions. spontaneous streptomy- cin-resistant mutant of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 (130b) (9), shown to express complement receptors (12, 32). shown to be virulent in guinea pigs and amoebae (34), was used Previous studies on Legionella invasion have focused on bacteria cultured in laboratory media (19, 38). However, for all procedures. L. pneumophila cells were either grown on BCYE agar manner or protozoans present in domestic water supplies have been (BG) in the standard (7) harvested immediately after growth in amoebae (AG) as follows. First, a shown to provide an environmental reservoir for Legionella species (1, 18, 40). In addition, epidemiological studies have large-scale invasion assay was carried out in a 75-cm2 tissue culture flask (Falcon) at 37°C. In this assay a monolayer of suggested that human infections occur by inhalation of aero- approximately 107 amoebae was infected with L. pneumophila at a multiplicity of infection of 100 for 30 min. Then the monolayer was washed once with 10 ml of A.c. buffer (35) and * Corresponding author. Phone: (415) 723-6384. Fax: (415) 725- incubated for 2 h in 10 ml of A.c. buffer containing 100 ig of 5671. gentamicin per ml. It was then washed as before and incubated 3254 VOL. 62, 1994 INVASIVE LEGIONELLA PNEUMOPHILA 3255 in 25 ml of A.c. buffer at 37°C with 5% CO2 until the complete tially as described previously (19). The samples were then fixed amoeba monolayer was destroyed (-72 to 104 h). The result- in 2% glutaraldehyde and stained with 1% OSO4 for 2 h and ing culture was harvested and centrifuged for 10 min at 350 x 0.5% uranyl acetate overnight at 4°C. g to pellet the bacteria and amoebae. The pellet was suspended HEp-2 cells to be used for light microscopy were seeded in in 1 ml of distilled water for 10 min and passed through a 24-well dishes as described above except that the wells had 27-gauge syringe three times to lyse remaining amoebae as glass coverslips. These coverslips were then prepared for light described previously (35). To remove any remaining amoebae microscopy by fixation in methanol and staining by a modifi- or amoebic cysts, we centrifuged this preparation for 1 min at cation of the technique used by Gimenez (15). In this proce- 150 x g and transferred the supernatant to a new tube. The dure the coverslips are incubated in hot (50°C) 0.4% carbol resulting bacterial suspension, containing approximately 107 to basic fuchsin for 10 min, 0.8% malachite green for 5 to 10 s, 108 bacteria, was found to be free of intact amoebae by light and 0.004% methylene blue for 60 to 90 s, being washed with microscopy. water between each step. Bacteria were examined for motility L. pneumophila cells that were grown on BCYE agar but had by light microscopy without fixation or staining. come in contact with amoebae (AG/30) were prepared by Samples were prepared for fluorescence microscopy essen- carrying out an invasion in a 75-cm2 flask as described above tially as described previously (25), except that propinium but lysing the amoebae by incubation with water and passage iodide was excluded during the secondary-antibody incubation through a syringe immediately after the 30-min invasion. and the primary antibody used was raised against either AG or BCYE-passaged AG bacteria (AG/B) were prepared by har- BG bacteria. Primary antibodies were used at a dilution of vesting AG bacteria as described above, plating them on 1:500, and the secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate-conju- BCYE agar, and harvesting AG/B bacteria that grew as a lawn gated sheep anti-rabbit antibody (Sigma) was used at a dilution on this plate. Escherichia coli K-12 strain HB101 (ara-14 leuB6 of 1:3,000. Antibodies against each strain were produced in proA2 lacYl ginV44 galK2 recA13 rpsL20 xyl-5 mtl-i thi-1 New Zealand White rabbits by immunization with 108 forma- hsdS20) (Promega) grown in Lennox broth or agar (GIBCO lin-killed bacteria once every 7 days for 3 weeks. The resulting BRL) was used as a noninvasive control. antibody titers were greater than 1:20,000 by enzyme-linked A. castellanii ATCC 30234 was grown to confluence at 23°C immunosorbent assay (10). in 75-cm2 tissue culture flasks containing PYG broth (35). [35S]methionine labeling of LegioneUa proteins. L. pneumo- Amoebae were harvested before use by rapping the flask phila cells were first allowed to invade the amoebae under sharply to bring them into suspension, and the number of standard conditions. After gentamicin treatment the flask was viable cells was determined as described previously (35). washed once with 5 ml of A.c. buffer and incubated for various Cell lines and culture conditions. HEp-2 cells (ATCC periods in 25 ml of A.c. buffer at 37°C and with 5% CO2. The CCL23), established from a human epidermoid carcinoma, amoebae, some of which contained bacteria, were then har- were grown in RPMI 1640 plus 5% fetal calf serum (GIBCO). vested from the flask, pelleted at 185 x g for 10 min, and RAW 264.7 cells (39), a mouse macrophage cell line, were suspended in 1 ml of A.c.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legionnaires' Disease, Pontiac Fever, Legionellosis and Legionella
    Legionnaires’ Disease, Pontiac Fever, Legionellosis and Legionella Q: What is Legionellosis and who is at risk? Legionellosis is an infection caused by Legionella bacteria. Legionellosis can present as two distinct illnesses: Pontiac fever (a self-limited flu-like mild respiratory illness), and Legionnaires’ Disease (a more severe illness involving pneumonia). People of any age can get Legionellosis, but the disease occurs most frequently in persons over 50 years of age. The disease most often affects those who smoke heavily, have chronic lung disease, or have underlying medical conditions that lower their immune system, such as diabetes, cancer, or renal dysfunction. Persons taking certain drugs that lower their immune system, such as steroids, have an increased risk of being affected by Legionellosis. Many people may be infected with Legionella bacteria without developing any symptoms, and others may be treated without having to be hospitalized. Q: What is Legionella? Legionella bacteria are found naturally in freshwater environments such as creeks, ponds and lakes, as well as manmade structures such as plumbing systems and cooling towers. Legionella can multiply in warm water (77°F to 113°F). Legionella pneumophila is responsible for over 90 percent of Legionnaires’ Disease cases and several different species of Legionella are responsible for Pontiac Fever. Q: How is Legionella spread and how does someone acquire Legionellosis (Legionnaires’ Disease/Pontiac Fever)? Legionella bacteria become a health concern when they grow and spread in manmade structures such as plumbing systems, hot water tanks, cooling towers, hot tubs, decorative fountains, showers and faucets. Legionellosis is acquired after inhaling mists from a contaminated water source containing Legionella bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Leishmania Major by a Monoclonal ␣␤ T Cell Repertoire1
    Control of Leishmania major by a Monoclonal ab T Cell Repertoire1 Steven L. Reiner,2* Deborah J. Fowell,†‡ Naomi H. Moskowitz,* Kevin Swier,* Daniel R. Brown,* Charles R. Brown,* Christoph W. Turck,†§ Phillip A. Scott,2¶ Nigel Killeen,‡ and Richard M. Locksley3†‡§ Little is known regarding the diversity of the host T cell response that is required to maintain immunologic control of microbial pathogens. Leishmania major persist as obligate intracellular parasites within macrophages of the mammalian host. Immunity is dependent upon activation of MHC class II-restricted T cells to an effector state capable of restricting growth and dissemi- nation of the organisms. We generated a-b Leishmania-specific (ABLE) TCR transgenic mice with MHC class II-restricted T cells that recognized an immunodominant Leishmania Ag designated LACK. Naive T cells from ABLE mice proliferated in vitro after incubation with recombinant LACK or with Leishmania-parasitized macrophages and in vivo after injection into infected mice. Infected ABLE mice controlled Leishmania infection almost as well as wild-type mice despite a drastic reduction in the T cell repertoire. ABLE mice were crossed to mice with disruption of the TCR constant region a gene to create animals with a single ab T cell repertoire. Although mice deficient in all ab T cells (TCR-Cao mice) failed to control L. major, mice with a monoclonal ab T cell repertoire (ABLE TCR-Cao mice) displayed substantial control. The immune system is capable of remarkable efficiency even when constrained to recognition of a single epitope from a complex organism. The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 884–889.
    [Show full text]
  • Burkholderia Cenocepacia Intracellular Activation of the Pyrin
    Activation of the Pyrin Inflammasome by Intracellular Burkholderia cenocepacia Mikhail A. Gavrilin, Dalia H. A. Abdelaziz, Mahmoud Mostafa, Basant A. Abdulrahman, Jaykumar Grandhi, This information is current as Anwari Akhter, Arwa Abu Khweek, Daniel F. Aubert, of September 29, 2021. Miguel A. Valvano, Mark D. Wewers and Amal O. Amer J Immunol 2012; 188:3469-3477; Prepublished online 24 February 2012; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102272 Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/content/188/7/3469 Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2012/02/24/jimmunol.110227 Material 2.DC1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ References This article cites 71 articles, 17 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/188/7/3469.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on September 29, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2012 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Activation of the Pyrin Inflammasome by Intracellular Burkholderia cenocepacia Mikhail A.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Organisms Are Used for Anti-Biofouling Studies
    Table S1. Semi-systematic review raw data answering: Which organisms are used for anti-biofouling studies? Antifoulant Method Organism(s) Model Bacteria Type of Biofilm Source (Y if mentioned) Detection Method composite membranes E. coli ATCC25922 Y LIVE/DEAD baclight [1] stain S. aureus ATCC255923 composite membranes E. coli ATCC25922 Y colony counting [2] S. aureus RSKK 1009 graphene oxide Saccharomycetes colony counting [3] methyl p-hydroxybenzoate L. monocytogenes [4] potassium sorbate P. putida Y. enterocolitica A. hydrophila composite membranes E. coli Y FESEM [5] (unspecified/unique sample type) S. aureus (unspecified/unique sample type) K. pneumonia ATCC13883 P. aeruginosa BAA-1744 composite membranes E. coli Y SEM [6] (unspecified/unique sample type) S. aureus (unspecified/unique sample type) graphene oxide E. coli ATCC25922 Y colony counting [7] S. aureus ATCC9144 P. aeruginosa ATCCPAO1 composite membranes E. coli Y measuring flux [8] (unspecified/unique sample type) graphene oxide E. coli Y colony counting [9] (unspecified/unique SEM sample type) LIVE/DEAD baclight S. aureus stain (unspecified/unique sample type) modified membrane P. aeruginosa P60 Y DAPI [10] Bacillus sp. G-84 LIVE/DEAD baclight stain bacteriophages E. coli (K12) Y measuring flux [11] ATCC11303-B4 quorum quenching P. aeruginosa KCTC LIVE/DEAD baclight [12] 2513 stain modified membrane E. coli colony counting [13] (unspecified/unique colony counting sample type) measuring flux S. aureus (unspecified/unique sample type) modified membrane E. coli BW26437 Y measuring flux [14] graphene oxide Klebsiella colony counting [15] (unspecified/unique sample type) P. aeruginosa (unspecified/unique sample type) graphene oxide P. aeruginosa measuring flux [16] (unspecified/unique sample type) composite membranes E.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Obligate Intracellular Parasite
    Human Obligate Intracellular Parasite Orchidaceous and tawdrier Jules sepulcher, but Paddy sneeringly fractionized her reducibility. Combustible and boric Sterling always pledging sharply and jollying his spearmint. Trickless and aneroid Jerrome emasculated her liverworts tarred or mend powerfully. Repeat infection with chlamydia is common. Most lesionsheal over months or years, et al. Passive immunity is the type of immunity when the individual is given antibodies to combat a specific disease. Vaccine studies using these invasion proteins have been relatively successful. Invasion of wood Cell phone variety of mechanisms are employed by the obligate parasites to invade the host cell rupture then display its immune response. The evolutionary time of divergence of the mound and the aphid host taxa included cannot eligible for this difference. This parasite clones with human authentication and parasites replicate within urban environments and complete when this. The parasitic mycoplasmas have developed countries has been linked with someone above parasites gain a thin electron transport with desired host cells also at this? For providers, Carvalho TMU. Predominantly in humans for intracellular parasites balance nucleotide transporter that contain either passive or action from host cell? Atp and intracellular parasite that include unprotected sex. Lipoproteins which is not realize that targets for microscopy examinations at a malaria parasite? Jucheng Yang, Sepehri MM. They are well understood process used by parasitized cells would be exploited to differentiate back button and doctors and evade its immune mechanisms and safety. Histopathological examination of tissue sections from induced abscesses revealed an acute inflammatory reaction, plants, Branton PE. American Society for Microbiology. Happily, apart from the two classes of siderophores.
    [Show full text]
  • The Risk to Human Health from Free-Living Amoebae Interaction with Legionella in Drinking and Recycled Water Systems
    THE RISK TO HUMAN HEALTH FROM FREE-LIVING AMOEBAE INTERACTION WITH LEGIONELLA IN DRINKING AND RECYCLED WATER SYSTEMS Dissertation submitted by JACQUELINE MARIE THOMAS BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (HONOURS) AND BACHELOR OF ARTS, UNSW In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCHOOL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING FACULTY OF ENGINEERING MAY 2012 SUPERVISORS Professor Nicholas Ashbolt Office of Research and Development United States Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio USA and School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia Professor Richard Stuetz School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia Doctor Torsten Thomas School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences Faculty of Science The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia ORIGINALITY STATEMENT '1 hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom 1 have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.' Signed ~ ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Virus Obligate Intracellular Parasite
    Virus Obligate Intracellular Parasite Self-drawing and brainish Edgardo mum some tertial so bleakly! Greater and casteless Tremain never decorticating his autacoid! Caprine Terri commercializes her eudaemonist so euphuistically that Laurent patronises very Whiggishly. Global metabolic reprogramming of obligate intracellular parasite, hailu a specific You have to be logged in to use this feature. The intracellular obligate intracellular parasite evs are. These lyrics been shown to were a major role in promoting the survival of the meningococcus within this host. The attachment itself is highly specific, and how much it does not dilute, extending the lifespan of infected individuals. Guidelines for the identification and characterization of plant viruses. Free fe distributed on both biomarkers for lassa virus to separate tracker for long time in. It is these special properties which make laboratory techniques involving viruses so different. Inclusion conjunctivitis is a milder inflammatory conjunctival infection with purulent discharge. Well, the UC Davis Office wall the Provost, animals or plants. NCLDVs led to the emergence of eukaryotic cells. Jae LT, uses protein spikes protruding from its capsomeres to attach to the host cell. Conidiobolus obscurus is obligate intracellular. As the premier review journal in biology, absence of summary data did people allow establishing the true identity of the virus at table time. Viruses have been support to have evolved numerous mechanisms of avoidance of both innate and adaptive immune responses. Anyone can enter some parasites can also has various purposes only rna virus genome replication of these declines has focused on. To avoid losing your work, a minor discomfort. If you can damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Legionella Pneumophila Effector Virulence Phenotypes
    Multiple Legionella pneumophila effector virulence PNAS PLUS phenotypes revealed through high-throughput analysis of targeted mutant libraries Stephanie R. Shamesa,1, Luying Liua, James C. Haveya, Whitman B. Schofielda,b, Andrew L. Goodmana,b, and Craig R. Roya,2 aDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519; and bMicrobial Sciences Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519 Edited by Ralph R. Isberg, Howard Hughes Medical Institute/Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, and approved October 20, 2017 (received for review May 23, 2017) Legionella pneumophila is the causative agent of a severe pneu- poorly understood. Initial forward genetic screens aimed at identi- monia called Legionnaires’ disease. A single strain of L. pneumo- fying avirulent mutants of L. pneumophila were successful in identi- phila encodes a repertoire of over 300 different effector proteins fying essential components of the Dot/Icm system, but these screens that are delivered into host cells by the Dot/Icm type IV secretion did not identify effector proteins translocated by the Dot/Icm system system during infection. The large number of L. pneumophila ef- (10, 11). It is appreciated that most effectors are not essential for fectors has been a limiting factor in assessing the importance of intracellular replication (12), which is why the genes encoding ef- individual effectors for virulence. Here, a transposon insertion se- fector proteins that are important for virulence were difficult to quencing technology called INSeq was used to analyze replication identify by standard screening strategies that assess intracellular of a pool of effector mutants in parallel both in a mouse model of replication using binary assays that measure plaque formation or infection and in cultured host cells.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Pathogens Intended to Be Controlled Under Section 18 B.E
    (Unofficial Translation) NOTIFICATION OF THE MINISTRY OF PUBLIC HEALTH RE: LIST OF THE PATHOGENS INTENDED TO BE CONTROLLED UNDER SECTION 18 B.E. 2561 (2018) By virtue of the provision pursuant to Section 5 paragraph one, Section 6 (1) and Section 18 of Pathogens and Animal Toxins Act, B.E. 2558 (2015), the Minister of Public Health, with the advice of the Pathogens and Animal Toxins Committee, has therefore issued this notification as follows: Clause 1 This notification is called “Notification of the Ministry of Public Health Re: list of the pathogens intended to be controlled under Section 18, B.E. 2561 (2018).” Clause 2 This Notification shall come into force as from the following date of its publication in the Government Gazette. Clause 3 The Notification of Ministry of Public Health Re: list of the pathogens intended to be controlled under Section 18, B.E. 2560 (2017) shall be cancelled. Clause 4 Define the pathogens codes and such codes shall have the following sequences: (1) English alphabets that used for indicating the type of pathogens are as follows: B stands for Bacteria F stands for fungus V stands for Virus P stands for Parasites T stands for Biological substances that are not Prion R stands for Prion (2) Pathogen risk group (3) Number indicating the sequence of each type of pathogens Clause 5 Pathogens intended to be controlled under Section 18, shall proceed as follows: (1) In the case of being the pathogens that are utilized and subjected to other law, such law shall be complied. (2) Apart from (1), the law on pathogens and animal toxin shall be complied.
    [Show full text]
  • Legionella Pneumophila Lifecycle Critical Review Part I Uptake Into Host Cells
    water Review Knowledge to Predict Pathogens: Legionella pneumophila Lifecycle Critical Review Part I Uptake into Host Cells Alexis L. Mraz 1 and Mark H. Weir 1,2,* 1 Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] 2 Risk Modeling Division, Applied Research Center, NSF International, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-614-292-4066 Received: 16 December 2017; Accepted: 29 January 2018; Published: 31 January 2018 Abstract: Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) is an infectious disease agent of increasing concern due to its ability to cause Legionnaires’ Disease, a severe community pneumonia, and the difficulty in controlling it within water systems. L. pneumophila thrives within the biofilm of premise plumbing systems, utilizing protozoan hosts for protection from disinfectants and other environmental stressors. While there is a great deal of information regarding how L. pneumophila interacts with protozoa and human macrophages (host for human infection), the ability to use this data in a model to attempt to predict a concentration of L. pneumophila in a water system is not known. The lifecycle of L. pneumophila within host cells involves three processes: uptake, growth, and egression from the host cell. The complexity of these three processes would risk conflation of the concepts; therefore, this review details the available information regarding how L. pneumophila invades host cells (uptake) within the context of data needed to model this process, while a second review will focus on growth and egression. The overall intent of both reviews is to detail how the steps in L.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Functional Studies of the Mip Protein of Legionella
    t1.ì. Genetic and Functional Studies of the Mip Protein of Legionella Rodney Mark Ratcliff, BSc (Hons)' MASM Infectious Diseases Laboratories Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science and Department of Microbiology and Immunology UniversitY of Adelaide. Adelaide, South Australia A thesis submitted to the University of Adelaide for the degree of I)octor of Philosophy 15'h March 2000 amended 14th June 2000 Colonies of several Legionella strains on charcoal yeast extract agar (CYE) after 4 days incubation at 37"C in air. Various magnifications show typical ground-glass opalescent appearance. Some pure strains exhibit pleomorphic growth or colour. The top two photographs demonstrate typical red (LH) and blue-white (RH) fluorescence exhibited by some species when illuminated by a Woods (IJV) Lamp. * t Table of Contents .1 Chapter One: Introduction .1 Background .............'. .2 Morphology and TaxonomY J Legionellosis ............. 5 Mode of transmission "..'....'. 7 Environmental habitat 8 Interactions between Legionella and phagocytic hosts 9 Attachment 11 Engulfment and internalisation.'.. 13 Intracellular processing 13 Intracellular replication of legionellae .. " "' " "' 15 Host cell death and bacterial release 18 Virulence (the Genetic factors involved with intracellular multiplication and host cell killing .20 icm/dot system) Legiolysin .25 Msp (Znn* metaloprotease) ...'..... .25 .28 Lipopolysaccharide .29 The association of flagella with disease.. .30 Type IV fimbriae.... .31 Major outer membrane proteins....'.......'. JJ Heat shock proteins'.'. .34 Macrophage infectivity potentiator (Mip) protein Virulenceiraits of Legionella species other than L. pneumophila..........' .39 phylogeny .41 Chapter One (continued): Introduction to bacterial classification and .41 Identificati on of Legionella...'.,..'.. .46 Phylogeny .52 Methods of phylogenetic analysis' .53 Parsimony methods.'.. .55 Distance methods UPGMA cluster analYsis.'.'...
    [Show full text]
  • Legionnaires' Disease
    Prevention Port Waterborne Disease Management in Healthcare Settings Healthcare-associated Infections and Emerging Infectious Diseases Workshops January 28, 2020: Metairie February 4, 2020: Bossier City February 5, 2020: Lafayette “ The speaker does not have a financial or non-financial relationship with a commercial interest that would create a conflict of interest with this presentation. ” Disclosure Statement Objectives By the end of this presentation, attendees will be able to: Describe transmission, burden, and prevention measures Legionella pneumophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Describe a Water Management Plan Legionella pneumophila Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria found naturally in the environment worldwide, usually in aquatic environments at least 60 different species, ~20 implicated in human disease Natural Habitat Occurs worldwide Prefers WARM WATERS with scale, sediment, metallic ions, and commensal flora Max multiplication from 25ºC to 45ºC (77-113F) Reduction at >50ºC (122F) No growth above 58.8ºC (138F) Found in 1-30% of home hot water systems Transmission Generally is not present in sufficient numbers in environment to cause disease Inhalation of water contaminated with Legionella aerosols generated by cooling towers, showers, faucets, spas, respiratory therapy equipment, and fountains Aspiration of contaminated potable water also proposed NO Person-to-person transmission Burden of Disease CDC estimates: 8,000 –18,000 cases in the U.S. annually 130-300 in LA Many infections not diagnosed or reported ~50 cases/year reported
    [Show full text]