Biodiversity and Stakeholders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity and Stakeholders United Nations Man and the Biosphere / Ê "/ - Educational, Scientific and Programme £ÓääÈ Cultural Organization #*041)&3&3&4&37&45&$)/*$"-/05&4 #JPEJWFSTJUZBOETUBLFIPMEFST DPODFSUBUJPOJUJOFSBSJFT ISSN 2071-1468 ¼ V i À Ì > Ì ½ \ Ê « À V i Ã Ã Ê vÊ> VÌÛiÊ`>}ÕiÊLiÌÜiiÊ`vv iÀiÌ ÊÃÌ> i ` i À Ã Ê Ü À } v Õ Ê Ê i Ì > Ê ` « } Ê i « i Ì Û i À i ` Ê À Ê Ì Ê Ì À Ê i V V « à > Ê À ÊV Ê v V Ê ] Ü V i V i Û Ê Õ À v Ì Ã Ê i Ã Ê Ì ` Ê Ê « Ê Ì > ] i à i À V Û Ì Ì V à i Ê L v Ê Ê ] Û Ã Ã Ã Ê L Õ ` }ÊV«iÌÃÊÌ }i Ì i À Ê Ì Ê « À i V Ì Ê Ì ÊÌ i ÊvÕ ÌÕÀi ÊV iVÌÛiÞ°Ê BIODIVERSITY and STAKEHOLDERS: CONCERTATION ITINERARIES The authors are responsible for the choice and presentation of the viewpoints and information contained in their articles, which in no way commit UNESCO. The designations employed and the presentation of data throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Publication manager: Natarajan Ishwaran Editor-in-Chief: Meriem Bouamrane Revision: Josette Gainche, UNESCO Graphic design: Ivette Fabbri, UNESCO Cover photograph: Hubert de Foresta, IRD Translation: Mary Shaffer First published in French (May 2006) as Biodiversité et acteurs: des itinéraires de concertation. This publication as well as the French version received fi nancial support from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs within the scope of the Fonds de Solidarité Prioritaire (FSP) for Biodiversity. Special thanks go to Laurent Bonneau, Olivier Robinet and Geoffroy Mauvais for their valuable cooperation and support. Thanks are also extended to Martine Antona (CIRAD), Catherine Cibien (French MAB National Committee) and Malcolm Hadley (UNESCO) for their contributions to this work. Proposed citation: Bouamrane, M. (ed.). 2006 Biodiversity and stakeholders: concertation itineraries. Biosphere Reserves – Technical Notes 1. UNESCO, Paris Published in September 2006 by the MAB Programme, UNESCO 1, rue Miollis 75732 Paris Cedex 15, France Tel.: 33 (0) 1 45 68 40 67 Fax: 33 (0) 1 45 68 58 04 E-mail: [email protected] www.unesco.org/mab Printed by UNESCO © UNESCO 2006 Printed in France Biosphere Reserves – Technical notes 1 - 2006 2 BIODIVERSITY and STAKEHOLDERS: CONCERTATION ITINERARIES or thirty years, the MAB Programme, particularly through its World Network of Biosphere Reserves, has initiated and supported studies on the interactions between human societies and natural resources in various cultural and socio-economic con- texts. A biosphere reserve is a multi-objective (conservation, economic development, scien- tifi c research and training), multi-use and multi-stakeholder territorial space, which relies on a zonation system to fulfi ll its functions. The stakeholders and institutions intervening in this space may have different interests and relationships to time, property and nature, which may confl ict. The Seville Strategy seeks to promote the management of each bios- phere reserve essentially as a ‘pact’ between the local community and society as a whole. More particularly, Goal II of the Seville Strategy (‘Utilize the biosphere reserves as models of land management and of approaches to sustainable development’) recommends, at the international level, to ‘Prepare guidelines for key aspects of biosphere reserve mana- gement, including the resolution of confl icts, provision of local benefi ts and involvement of Preface stakeholders in decision-making and in responsibility for management’. (II.1.1). In light of the many objectives assigned to a biosphere reserve and the diversity of stakeholders, institutions and their interests, biosphere reserves are research and training laboratories for the prevention and management of confl icts linked to the challenges of conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. It was thus deemed strategic to share ex- periences, cultural approaches, practices and methodologies for dialogue and concertation in the creation and management of biosphere reserves in the World Network, in different socio-economic and cultural contexts. This technical note is intended to stimulate discussion about the challenges of recon- ciling conservation and development within biosphere reserves and the different means of governance set up on the sites and their capacity to evolve. The researchers’ contributions are divided into four chapters: the fi rst addresses challenges concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in biosphere reserves; it identifi es the different sour- ces and types of confl icts. The second chapter raises the question of the role of scientifi c knowledge, suggests the creation of gateways between researchers and managers, and of- fers an initial assessment of the participatory approaches. The third chapter introduces the use of innovative tools which have been tested in several biosphere reserves in Europe and Africa to facilitate dialogue and concertation among different stakeholders. Finally, the last chapter suggests proposals for research and training, favouring a comparative and dyna- mic approach in order to better understand changes, factors of innovation and learning in biosphere reserves. These considerations must be enriched through the contributions of our partners and explored in greater detail in the coming years through comparative case studies throughout all regions of the world, based on the richness and diversity of the experiences and practices of the biosphere reserves that are part of the World Network. The Division of Ecological and Earth Sciences, through its intergovernmental MAB Programme, thus wishes to make a substantive contribution to the challenges of biodiversity management in multi-use spaces, with an objective of sustainable development. Natarajan Ishwaran Secretary, International Coordinating Council for the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme Director, Division of Ecological and Earth Sciences 3 Lamine KANE is a manager with the Division of Natural Parks (DPN) in Se- Boureima AMADOU negal. He was trained as a botanist and works on fl ora dyna- mics in the Niokolo Koba Park (Senegal). He wrote a disserta- is a senior lecturer with the Department of Geography of the Faculty of Arts and the Humanities at the Abdou Moumouni tion on monitoring indicators for fl ora and vegetation, as well University in Niamey, Niger. He is also part of the IRD Re- as the monitoring of anthropic pressure in the Niokolo Koba Biosphere Reserve (Senegal), at the Institute for Environmen- search Unit working on ‘Heritage and Territories: Local strate- Frédéric BIORET tal Science (ISE). gies in building natural and territorial heritage’. His research is a professor of environmental sciences at the University of Division Formation et Communication focuses on agrarian systems, in particular the internal capaci- Western Brittany and vice-chair of the French MAB National Direction des Parcs Nationaux ty for innovation among Sahelian farmer-herders. Since 2001, Committee. He is a member of the offi ce of Natural Reserves Parc Forestier de Hann, BP 5135, Dakar Fann (Sénégal) he has studied issues related to natural heritage, stakeholder of France, which he represents at the National Council for the [email protected], dynamics, and confl ict resolution in the biosphere reserves Protection of Nature. His research interests focus on coas- [email protected] of West Africa. tal fl ora and plant life, issues concerning the management of F.L.S.H. Université Abdou Moumouni, sensitive natural areas, and bio-evaluation as a tool for land Harold LEVREL B.P. 418, Niamey (Niger) use management. is a research fellow in social sciences at the École des Hautes [email protected] et Institut de Géoarchitecture, Études in Paris. He has completed a dissertation in ecologi- [email protected] Université de Bretagne occidentale. cal economics with the Joint Research Unit on Conservation 6 avenue le Gorgeu, 29238 Brest Cedex 3 (France) Karimou AMBOUTA Biology (UMR 51-73) at the National Museum of Natural His- [email protected] tory. His work focuses on indicators relating to interactions is an agronomist at the University of Niamey (Niger) who between biodiversity dynamics and socio-economic dynamics focuses in particular, on the restoration of damaged environ- Meriem BOUAMRANE in the biosphere reserves of West Africa and France. He is a ments in the ‘W’ Biosphere Reserve. He is in charge of tea- is an environmental economist and programme specialist at consultant for UNESCO within the framework of the regional ching about water and soil conservation and soil protection UNESCO, in the Division of Ecological and Earth Sciences, project in the six dryland biosphere reserves of West Africa. and restoration at the University, and works, in particular, on which oversees the intergovernmental programme on Man UMR 51-73, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris (France) the sustainable management of soil fertility. He is the author and the Biosphere (MAB). She works primarily on issues con- [email protected] of a number of works and publications on these subjects. cerning the access and use of biodiversity, confl ict prevention Since 2003, he has also been the coordinator of the inter-uni- and management, and the effectiveness of concertation ap- Mahamane MAIGA versity research programme (Belgium, Niger) on the sanding proaches to reconcile conservation and the sustainable use of is an ecologist by training and a teacher-researcher at the Hi- up of basins in northeastern Niger: processes, effects, and biodiversity, in biosphere reserves in particular. gher Institute of Training and Applied Research (ISFRA) in Ba- methods to combat this phenomenon. UNESCO, Division of Ecological and mako (Mali). He was also a teacher and researcher at Faculty of Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey, Earth Sciences, Science and Techniques of the University of Mali for ten years.
Recommended publications
  • Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1
    CK-12 FOUNDATION Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1 Akre CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the “FlexBook,” CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high-quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning. Copyright © 2010 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution/Non-Commercial/Share Alike 3.0 Un- ported (CC-by-NC-SA) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Commons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. Specific details can be found at http://about.ck12.org/terms. Printed: October 11, 2010 Author Barbara Akre Contributor Jean Battinieri i www.ck12.org Contents 1 Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1 1 1.1 Lesson 18.1: The Biodiversity Crisis ............................... 1 1.2 Lesson 18.2: Natural Resources .................................. 32 2 Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part I 49 2.1 Chapter 18: Ecology and Human Actions ............................ 49 2.2 Lesson 18.1: The Biodiversity Crisis ............................... 49 2.3 Lesson 18.2: Natural Resources .................................. 53 www.ck12.org ii Chapter 1 Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1 1.1 Lesson 18.1: The Biodiversity Crisis Lesson Objectives • Compare humans to other species in terms of resource needs and use, and ecosystem service benefits and effects.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biosphere Reserve? a Biosphere Reserve (BR) Is an International Designation by UNESCO in the Man and Biosphere (MAB) Program
    Appendix 1. The ES concept in the UNESCO Man and Biosphere (MAB) program What is a Biosphere Reserve? A biosphere reserve (BR) is an international designation by UNESCO in the Man And Biosphere (MAB) program. A BR includes one or several protected areas and their surrounding landscape to combine both biodiversity conservation and sustainable/wise use of natural resources. A BR is a place where local communities are involved in management through dialogue and concerted multi-stakeholder approaches. Through monitoring, research, education, and training, BRs aim to develop and demonstrate sound sustainable development practices and policies. In 2017, there are 669 BRs in 120 countries all over the world, connected through international, regional, and national networks promoting knowledge sharing and exchanges of experiences. How is the ES concept operationalized in Biosphere Reserves? Since 2013, the ES concept has been integrated in the requisite forms for BR creation or revision. Coordinators are requested to address the following: “- 12.1 If possible, identify the ecosystem services provided by each ecosystem of the biosphere reserve and the beneficiaries of these services. - 12.2 Specify whether indicators of ecosystem services are used to evaluate the three functions (conservation, development, and logistic) of biosphere reserves. If yes, which ones and give details. - 12.3 Describe biodiversity involved in the provision of ecosystems services in the biosphere reserve (e.g. species or groups of species involved). - 12.4 Specify whether any ecosystem services assessment has been done for the proposed biosphere reserve”. This requires inventory approaches, with objective ES assessments, rather than deliberations among people about ES management.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosphere Introduction the Biosphere in Education
    10/5/2016 Biosphere ­ Encyclopedia of Earth AUTHOR LOGIN EOE PAGES BROWSE THE EOE Home Article Tools: Titles (A­Z) About the EoE Authors Editorial Board Biosphere Topics International Advisory Board Topic Editors FAQs Lead Author: Erle Ellis (other articles) Content Partners EoE for Educators Article Topic: Geography Content Sources Contribute to the EoE This article has been reviewed and approved by the following Topic Editor: Leszek A. eBooks Bledzki (other articles) Support the EoE Classics Last Updated: January 8, 2009 Contact the EoE Collections Find Us Here RSS Reviews Table of Contents Awards and Honors Introduction 1 Introduction The biosphere is the biological component of earth systems, which 1.1 History of the Biosphere also include the lithosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere and other Concept 2 The Biosphere in Education "spheres" (e.g. cryosphere, anthrosphere, etc.). The biosphere 3 Biosphere Research includes all living organisms on earth, together with the dead organic 4 The Future of the Biosphere matter produced by them. 5 More About the Biosphere 6 Further Reading The biosphere concept is common to many scientific disciplines including astronomy, SOLUTIONS JOURNAL geophysics, geology, hydrology, biogeography and evolution, and is a core concept in ecology, earth science and physical geography. A key component of earth systems, the biosphere interacts with and exchanges matter and energy with the other spheres, helping to drive the global biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur and other elements. From an ecological point of view, the biosphere is the "global ecosystem", comprising the totality of biodiversity on earth and performing all manner of biological functions, including photosynthesis, respiration, decomposition, nitrogen fixation and denitrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources and Biodiversity
    Environment at a Glance Indicators – Biological resources and biodiversity Environment at a Glance Indicators Biological resources and biodiversity Context Issues at stake Biodiversity and ecosystem services are integral elements of natural capital. Biodiversity, which encompasses species, ecosystems, and genetic diversity, provides invaluable ecosystem services (including raw materials for many sectors of the economy) and plays an essential role in maintaining life-support systems and quality of life. The loss of biodiversity is a key concern nationally and globally. Pressures on biodiversity include changes in land cover and sea use, over-exploitation of natural resources, pollution, climate change and invasive alien species. Policy challenges The main challenge is to ensure effective conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. This implies strengthening the degree of protection of species, habitats and terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems. Strategies include eliminating illegal exploitation and trade of endangered species, putting in place ambitious policies (covering regulatory approaches, economic instruments, and other information and voluntary approaches); and integrating biodiversity concerns into economic and sectoral policies. Biodiversity protection also requires reforming and removing environmentally harmful subsidies and strengthening the role of biodiversity-relevant taxes, fees and charges, as well as other economic instruments such as payments for ecosystem services, biodiversity offsets and tradable permits
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation I: Reserve Planning and Design
    Network of Conservation Educators & Practitioners Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation I: Reserve Planning and Design Author(s): Eugenia Naro-Maciel, Eleanor J. Stering, and Madhu Rao Source: Lessons in Conservation, Vol. 2, pp. 19-49 Published by: Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History Stable URL: ncep.amnh.org/linc/ This article is featured in Lessons in Conservation, the official journal of the Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners (NCEP). NCEP is a collaborative project of the American Museum of Natural History’s Center for Biodiversity and Conservation (CBC) and a number of institutions and individuals around the world. Lessons in Conservation is designed to introduce NCEP teaching and learning resources (or “modules”) to a broad audience. NCEP modules are designed for undergraduate and professional level education. These modules—and many more on a variety of conservation topics—are available for free download at our website, ncep.amnh.org. To learn more about NCEP, visit our website: ncep.amnh.org. All reproduction or distribution must provide full citation of the original work and provide a copyright notice as follows: “Copyright 2008, by the authors of the material and the Center for Biodiversity and Conservation of the American Museum of Natural History. All rights reserved.” Illustrations obtained from the American Museum of Natural History’s library: images.library.amnh.org/digital/ SYNTHESIS 19 Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation I: Reserve Planning and Design Eugenia Naro-Maciel,* Eleanor J. Stering, † and Madhu Rao ‡ * The American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, U.S.A., email [email protected] † The American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, U.S.A., email [email protected] ‡ Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, NY, U.S.A., email [email protected] Source: K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biodiversity–Ecosystem Function Debate in Ecology
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the book Handbook of The Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Ecology. The copy attached is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research, and educational use. This includes without limitation use in instruction at your institution, distribution to specific colleagues, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From deLaplante Kevin, and Picasso Valentin, The Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Debate in Ecology. In: Dov M. Gabbay, Paul Thagard and John Woods, editors, Handbook of The Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Ecology. San Diego: North Holland, 2011, pp. 169-200. ISBN: 978-0-444-51673-2 © Copyright 2011 Elsevier B. V. North Holland. Author's personal copy THE BIODIVERSITY–ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION DEBATE IN ECOLOGY Kevin deLaplante and Valentin Picasso 1 INTRODUCTION Population/community ecology and ecosystem ecology present very different per- spectives on ecological phenomena. Over the course of the history of ecology there has been relatively little interaction between the two fields at a theoretical level, despite general acknowledgment that many ecosystem processes are both influ- enced by and constrain population- and community-level phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Biodiversity
    CBD 1 What is Biodiversity? Biodiversity = Biological + Diversity The diversity of living organisms •Within species •Between species •Within / between ecosystems CBD Well to begin, I think it is important that we define what Biodiversity is. Biodiversity is actually a shortened way of saying Biological Diversity. What do you think this means? Well, biological = biology, which means living organisms. Diversity is the variety, or the many differences among things. So biological diversity would mean the variety of living things! This diversity, or these differences between living things, happens at different levels. First we see this variety within a species. For example, what are these pictures of? That’s right, butterflies….but are they all the same? What’s different about them? Size, shape of the wings, color, habitats, life cycles etc. (Can then give another example: Look around the room at your classmates? What do you see? I see a whole bunch of people, one species, but everyone looks just a little bit different. What are the differences you see? Hair color, eye color, shape, height, weight etc.) Then we have variety, or diversity between species. That’s a really easy one….how many mammals can you guys think of? (children will start naming all sorts of animals) That’s right, see, just within the mammals you can see that there are all sorts of different species. Then the last type of diversity we see is within ecosystems? Does anyone here know what an ecosystem is? An ecosystem is a specific area where we see the biotic, the living parts, and the abiotic, nonliving parts of the environment interact with and depend on each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities Should Respond to the Biodiversity Extinction Crisis ✉ Cathy Oke 1,2,3 , Sarah A
    www.nature.com/npjUrbanSustain COMMENT OPEN Cities should respond to the biodiversity extinction crisis ✉ Cathy Oke 1,2,3 , Sarah A. Bekessy4, Niki Frantzeskaki5, Judy Bush 6, James A. Fitzsimons 7,8, Georgia E. Garrard4, Maree Grenfell9, Lee Harrison3, Martin Hartigan7,9, David Callow3, Bernie Cotter2 and Steve Gawler2 Cities globally are greening their urban fabric, but to contribute positively to the biodiversity extinction crisis, local governments must explicitly target actions for biodiversity. We apply the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) framework — nature for nature, society and culture — to elevate local governments’ efforts in the lead up to the 2021 UN Biodiversity Conference. The UN’s Vision of Living in Harmony with Nature can only be realised if cities are recognised and resourced for their roles in biodiversity protection — for nature, for society and for culture. npj Urban Sustainability (2021) 1:11 ; https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-020-00010-w INTRODUCTION contributing to biodiversity and civic amenity4. The CitiesWithNa- Following the release of the Global Assessment Report on ture platform (https://citieswithnature.org/) hosts cities with Biodiversity by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on dedicated strategies on biodiversity and nature-based solutions Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)1, awareness of the to share knowledge and create a global community of pioneering biodiversity extinction crisis has heightened, catalysing calls for local and subnational governments. For example, the cities of 1234567890():,; cities and nations to respond. Mass global protests, including Montreal and Melbourne have incorporated biodiversity actions youth climate strikes and Extinction Rebellion, and crises such as into strategic plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges M
    S CIENCE’ S C OMPASS ● REVIEW REVIEW: ECOLOGY Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges M. Loreau,1* S. Naeem,2 P. Inchausti,1 J. Bengtsson,3 J. P. Grime,4 A. Hector,5 D. U. Hooper,6 M. A. Huston,7 D. Raffaelli,8 B. Schmid,9 D. Tilman,10 D. A. Wardle4 primary production in grassland ecosystems The ecological consequences of biodiversity loss have aroused considerable interest (20–23). Because plants, as primary produc- and controversy during the past decade. Major advances have been made in describing ers, represent the basal component of most the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem processes, in identifying ecosystems, they represented the logical functionally important species, and in revealing underlying mechanisms. There is, place to begin detailed studies. Several, al- however, uncertainty as to how results obtained in recent experiments scale up to though not all, experiments using randomly landscape and regional levels and generalize across ecosystem types and processes. assembled communities found that primary Larger numbers of species are probably needed to reduce temporal variability in production exhibits a positive relationship ecosystem processes in changing environments. A major future challenge is to with plant species and functional-group di- determine how biodiversity dynamics, ecosystem processes, and abiotic factors versity (Fig. 1). interact. These results attracted a great deal of interest, not only because they were novel, but also because they seemed counter to pat- he relationship between biodiversity the current debate in which scientists dis- terns often observed in nature, where the and ecosystem functioning has emerged agree about the relative importance of func- most productive ecosystems are typically T as a central issue in ecological and tional substitutions and declining species characterized by low species diversity (26, environmental sciences during the last de- richness as determinants of changes in eco- 27).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity – Climate Interactions
    Biodiversity–climate interactions: adaptation, mitigation and human livelihoods Cover images: Masai Cattle in area affected by drought, Tanzania. Getty Images, number dv118057. Rob Suisted / www.naturespic.com. Maud Island frog (Leiopelma pakeka), Maud Island, New Zealand. Paul Nicklen, Phoenix Islands, Kiribati, Polynesia. Getty Images, number 77163682. Biodiversity–climate interactions: adaptation, mitigation and human livelihoods Report of an international meeting, June 2007 ISBN 978 0 85403 676 9 © The Royal Society 2008 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG Email: [email protected] Typeset by The Clyvedon Press Ltd, Cardiff, UK Preparation of this report This policy report is based on material presented at an international workshop held in June 2007 at the Royal Society, London, and reflects the main messages that arose from discussions during the break-out and plenary discussions. The report was drafted by the Royal Society Science Policy section with support from the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; UK Department for International Development; UK Joint Nature Conservation Committee; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; and the Met Office Hadley Centre, UK. Presenters at the meeting were invited to submit additional text summarising their key messages following the workshop. The responses received are appended to this document. The following experts contributed to the drafting of the report:
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Glossary
    BIODIVERSITY GLOSSARY Biodiversity Glossary1 Access and benefit-sharing One of the three objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity, as set out in its Article 1, is the “fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources, including by appro- priate access to genetic resources and by appropriate transfer of relevant technologies, taking into account all rights over those resources and to technologies, and by appropriate funding”. The CBD also has several articles (especially Article 15) regarding international aspects of access to genetic resources. Alien species A species occurring in an area outside of its historically known natural range as a result of intentional or accidental dispersal by human activities (also known as an exotic or introduced species). Biodiversity Biodiversity—short for biological diversity—means the diversity of life in all its forms—the diversity of species, of genetic variations within one species, and of ecosystems. The importance of biological diversity to human society is hard to overstate. An estimated 40 per cent of the global economy is based on biologi- cal products and processes. Poor people, especially those living in areas of low agricultural productivity, depend especially heavily on the genetic diversity of the environment. Biodiversity loss From the time when humans first occupied Earth and began to hunt animals, gather food and chop wood, they have had an impact on biodiversity. Over the last two centuries, human population growth, overex- ploitation of natural resources and environmental degradation have resulted in an ever accelerating decline in global biodiversity. Species are diminishing in numbers and becoming extinct, and ecosystems are suf- fering damage and disappearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Gincana 7: Biodiversity Is Our Life
    Biodiversity is life Biodiversity is our life Gincana 7 Printed in Canada ISBN 92-9225-203-8 © 2010 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity All rights reserved Design: Em Dash Design 100% Recycled Supporting responsible use of forest resources Cert no. SGS-COC-003939 www.fsc.org Printed on Rolland Enviro100 Print, which contains 100% post-consumer fi bre, is Environmental ©1996 Forest Stewardship Council Choice, Processed Chlorine Free, and manufactured in Canada by Cascades using biogas energy. Gincana 7 The International Year of Biodiversity Table of Contents AHMED DJOGHLAF Executive Secretary, Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) .......................... 2 BAN KI-MOON United Nations Secretary-General .............................................................. 3 ACHIM STEINER United Nations Under-Secretary General and Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) ............................................................... 4 ALI ABDUSSALAM TREKI President of the 64th Session of the United Nations General Assembly ................. 5 HER IMPERIAL HIGHNESS PRINCESS TAKAMADO Island ecosystem & sea level rise, French Polynesia, Bora Bora Honorary President, BirdLife International .................................................... 6 (Photo courtesy of Truchet/UNEP) YUKIO HATOYAMA LUC GNACADJA Prime Minister of Japan .......................................................................... 7 Executive Secretary, United Nations Convention to Combat HER ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCESS MAHA Desertifi cation
    [Show full text]