DOCSLIB.ORG

Deliverable D5.D: Report on the Position of Exotic Species in the Context of Estuaries, Rivers and Lakes Multi-Stressors and Regarding Ecosystem Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deliverable D5.D: Report on the Position of Exotic Species in the Context of Estuaries, Rivers and Lakes Multi-Stressors and Regarding Ecosystem Services Deliverable D5.D – Exotic species in multi-stressor context Funded by the European Union within the 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement 603378. Duration: February 1st, 2014 – January 31th, 2018 Deliverable D5.D: Report on the position of exotic species in the context of estuaries, rivers and lakes multi-stressors and regarding ecosystem services Lead contractor: Irstea Contributors: Maxime Logez, Benjamin Agaciak, Christine Argillier, Mario Lepage, Nils Teichert (Irstea), Rafaela Schinegger, Stefan Schmutz (BOKU), Pedro Segurado, Maria Teresa Ferreira (ULisboa), Guillem Chust, Ainhize Uriarte, Angel Borja (AZTI) Due date of deliverable: Month 33 Actual submission date: Month 37 Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Page 1/51 Deliverable D5.D – Exotic species in multi-stressor context Content Non-technical summary ............................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Available data ......................................................................................................................... 7 Sites description ..................................................................................................................... 8 Fish species status .................................................................................................................. 9 Fish functional traits ............................................................................................................... 9 Functional diversity .............................................................................................................. 10 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Regional species pool ........................................................................................................... 11 Distribution of native, translocated and exotic species ........................................................ 14 Functional attributes of fish species ..................................................................................... 19 Distribution of species with fishing interest ......................................................................... 24 Impact of non-native species on species of fishing interest ................................................. 31 Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 32 References ................................................................................................................................ 40 Supporting Materials ................................................................................................................ 46 Page 2/51 Deliverable D5.D – Exotic species in multi-stressor context Non-technical summary Non-native species, i.e. species occurring outside of their native range, have been recognised as a major threat for ecosystem functioning. Indeed, the number of non-native species introduced at all continents to support human activities or needs has increased during the last decades and several non-native species are now spread worldwide, e.g. mosquitofish species or salmonids. Aquatic ecosystems are particularly sensitive to these introductions. Numerous evidences were provided concerning their impact on native biota, at different levels of organisation (genetic, individual, population, community and ecosystem). Invasion biology is a complex discipline as the success of establishment of non-native species in new locations is driven by numerous factors that depend on the local context. Local environmental conditions, species tolerance, native biota and life history traits were hypothesised as key factors controlling the invasion success of an introduced species. The main objective of this study was to assess the impacts of non-native species on fish assemblages all along the freshwater-marine continuum at large scale in Europe. We thus considered lakes, rivers and estuaries of France, Spain and Portugal. The status of each species was defined at the national level (native, translocated or exotic) and served to assess the relative abundance of non-native species in fish assemblages. In order to understand the ability of non-native species to colonise new areas, we compared their characteristics to those of the native species through two components of functional diversity: specificity and originality. Results showed that estuaries were very different from lakes and rivers, with less non-native species. All were freshwater species with low occurrence and low abundances (Lepomis gibbosus, Ameiurus melas, Sander lucioperca. Silurus glanis, Carassius carassius, Cyprinus carpio). In contrast, in lakes and rivers, non-native fish species occurred in about 25% of fish assemblages, although with heterogeneous distributions across systems. Lakes were approximately four times more affected by the occurrences of non-native species than rivers. In France, Portugal and Spain, almost 1/3 of the regional species pools were composed of non-native fish species, with the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca), the pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus), the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) and the European catfish (Silurus glanis) being the most common non-native species encountered. With the exception of some particular locations, when non-native species were present, they only accounted for a small proportion of local fish abundances (on average 16.78% of catches). We also observed that the non-native species pool was overall more functionally original and specialized than the native species pool. This pattern suggests that non-native fish species exhibit functional traits that tend to differ from those of native species, which is consistent with previous observations. Moreover, this highlights the role played by non-native species in the functional richness of some assemblages, especially on the Iberian Peninsula, where local species and functional richness were generally low. A majority of non-native fish species investigated is known to be of interest, either for commercial or recreational fishing and, consequently, they have a high economic value. This Page 3/51 Deliverable D5.D – Exotic species in multi-stressor context observation is especially true on the Iberian Peninsula, where approximately half of the fished species represent non-native species. However, some of these non-native species with fishing interest are also known to deteriorate water quality, i.e. to increase nutrients and thus contributing to eutrophication of reservoirs. The management of non-native species (removal, control, etc.) should be integrated within an ecosystem service assessment framework, to weight the cost/benefits of given actions. Page 4/51 Deliverable D5.D – Exotic species in multi-stressor context Introduction The increasing concern about biodiversity conservation in face of a generalization of anthropogenic activities and their impacts gave rise to a huge literature focusing on the risk associated to introduced and invasive species in new environments (Lodge 1993). Indeed, it was claimed that introductions of non-native species may impair composition and structure of the communities, modify the whole ecosystem functioning and lead to an homogenization of communities (Vitousek 1990, Williamson 1996, Olden and Poff 2004, Villéger et al. 2014, Villéger et al. 2015). From an evolutional point of view, the geomorphological structure of freshwater ecosystems has been viewed as isolated biogeographic islands (Hugueny 1989), as natural barriers (ocean and land) limit connections between watersheds, with the exception for species tolerant to brackish waters (e.g. long distance migratory fish). These barriers to migration could have been overcome in some rare situations such as ice melting at the end of the last-glacial maximum (Hewitt 2000). The spread of non-native species after their introduction could potentially be limited in aquatic systems, as these natural barriers would prevent fish migration between basins. In spite of this limitation, non-native fish species are also now found in a large number of waterbodies (Welcomme 1988, Cowx 1998, Irz et al. 2004). It has been hypothesized that both artificial connections (i.e. channels) between waterbodies (Rahel 2007, Leuven et al. 2009) and fish stocking play a major role of in the spread of non-native fish into new habitats (Goudswaard et al. 2008, Gozlan et al. 2010b). Fish introduction could be accidental, when undesirable individuals are introduced with another native fish itself introduced to support natural population. It could also be intentional, as non-native fish are stocked to enhance recreational or professional fishing activities (Welcomme et al. 1983, Welcomme 1988, Holčík 1991, Cowx 1994, Crivelli 1995, Cowx 1998). Even if most introduced species do not succeed in settling (Williamson and Fitter 1996, Marchetti et al. 2004,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidance Document on the Strict Protection of Animal Species of Community Interest Under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC
    Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC Final version, February 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 I. CONTEXT 6 I.1 Species conservation within a wider legal and political context 6 I.1.1 Political context 6 I.1.2 Legal context 7 I.2 Species conservation within the overall scheme of Directive 92/43/EEC 8 I.2.1 Primary aim of the Directive: the role of Article 2 8 I.2.2 Favourable conservation status 9 I.2.3 Species conservation instruments 11 I.2.3.a) The Annexes 13 I.2.3.b) The protection of animal species listed under both Annexes II and IV in Natura 2000 sites 15 I.2.4 Basic principles of species conservation 17 I.2.4.a) Good knowledge and surveillance of conservation status 17 I.2.4.b) Appropriate and effective character of measures taken 19 II. ARTICLE 12 23 II.1 General legal considerations 23 II.2 Requisite measures for a system of strict protection 26 II.2.1 Measures to establish and effectively implement a system of strict protection 26 II.2.2 Measures to ensure favourable conservation status 27 II.2.3 Measures regarding the situations described in Article 12 28 II.2.4 Provisions of Article 12(1)(a)-(d) in relation to ongoing activities 30 II.3 The specific protection provisions under Article 12 35 II.3.1 Deliberate capture or killing of specimens of Annex IV(a) species 35 II.3.2 Deliberate disturbance of Annex IV(a) species, particularly during periods of breeding, rearing, hibernation and migration 37 II.3.2.a) Disturbance 37 II.3.2.b) Periods
    [Show full text]
  • Publis14-Mistea-007 {5E1DA239
    Bayesian hierarchical model used to analyze regression between fish body size and scale size: application torare fish species Zingel asper Bénédicte Fontez Nguyen The, Laurent Cavalli To cite this version: Bénédicte Fontez Nguyen The, Laurent Cavalli. Bayesian hierarchical model used to analyze regression between fish body size and scale size: application to rare fish species Zingel asper. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, EDP sciences/ONEMA, 2014, pp.10P1-10P8. 10.1051/kmae/2014008. hal-01499072 HAL Id: hal-01499072 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01499072 Submitted on 30 Mar 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (2014) 413, 10 http://www.kmae-journal.org c ONEMA, 2014 DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2014008 Bayesian hierarchical model used to analyze regression between fish body size and scale size: application to rare fish species Zingel asper B. Fontez(1),(2), L. Cavalli(3), Received May 24, 2013 Revised February 20, 2014 Accepted February 21, 2014 ABSTRACT Key-words: Back-calculation allows to increase available data on fish growth. The ac- hierarchical curacy of back-calculation models is of paramount importance for growth Bayes model, analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Structure of Fragmented Populations of a Threatened Endemic Percid of the Rhoˆne River: Zingel Asper
    Heredity (2004) 92, 329–334 & 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/04 $25.00 www.nature.com/hdy Genetic structure of fragmented populations of a threatened endemic percid of the Rhoˆne river: Zingel asper J Laroche1,2 and JD Durand1,3 1Laboratoire d’Ecologie des Hydrosyste`mes Fluviaux, UMR CNRS 5023, Universite´ Claude Bernard, 43 bd du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France; 2Laboratoire Ressources Halieutiques – Poissons Marins, Institut Universitaire Europe´en de la Mer, Place Nicolas Copernic, 29280, Plouzane´, France; 3IRD/Laboratoire Ge´nome, Populations, Interactions, UMR CNRS 5000, Universite´ Montpellier II, Station Me´diterrane´enne de l’Environnement Littoral 1, quai de la Daurade F-34200 Se`te, France Zingel asper is an endemic percid of the Rhoˆne basin equilibrium between mutation and drift. Thus, this population considered to be critically endangered. This species was shows an apparently better evolutionary potential for long- continuously distributed throughout the Rhoˆne in 1900, but term survival. Since 1930, a marked fragmentation of the today only occupies 17% of its initial area. In the present whole Rhoˆne system has appeared, related to the develop- study, five microsatellite loci were used to assess the level of ment of dams, and we assume that the significant genetic genetic variability within and among populations localized in differentiation detected between the populations could different sub-basins. Contrasting results were obtained for mainly reflect the impact of this fragmentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Actualisation Des Connaissances Sur La Population D'aprons Du Rhône (Zingel Asper) Dans Le Doubs Franco-Suisse
    Master Sciences de la Terre, de l'Eau et de l'Environnement Ingénierie des Hydrosystèmes et des Bassins Versants Parcours IMACOF Rapport de stage pour l'obtention de la 2ème année de Master Actualisation des connaissances sur la population d’aprons du Rhône (Zingel Asper) dans le Doubs franco-suisse - linéaire du futur Parc Naturel Régional transfrontalier - Propositions d’actions en faveur de l’espèce et de son milieu Florian BONNAIRE Septembre, 2012 Maître de stage : François BOINAY Organisme : Centre Nature Les Cerlatez Photo, 1ère de couverture : deux aprons vus le 13 août 2012 sur les gravières de Saint- Ursanne, dont le seul jeune individu observé au cours de cette campagne 2012. Photo prise par : Florian Bonnaire REMERCIEMENTS Nombreux sont ceux qui m’ont soutenu jusqu’à l’aboutissement de cette étude. Mes prochains remerciements iront donc à ces gens passionnants qui m’ont ouvert leurs portes et enrichi à leur manière cette belle aventure. Tout d’abord, mes remerciements vont à François Boinay, mon maître de stage mais aussi directeur du Centre Nature les Cerlatez. Merci pour m’avoir offert l’opportunité de faire ce stage passionnant au cœur des paysages grandioses de la vallée du Doubs franco-suisse. Merci pour ton aide précieuse mais aussi ton humour formidable que je n’oublierai pas. À Mickael Béjean, cet homme entièrement dévoué à l’apron sans qui cette étude n’aurait pas pris tout son sens. Merci pour tous ces conseils et partages d’expériences plus que bénéfiques, ainsi que pour ces quelques prospections nocturnes et subaquatiques. À Marianne Georget, animatrice du Plan National d’Action en faveur de l’apron du Rhône, pour m’avoir ouvert les portes des spécialistes, sans quoi le déroulement de ce stage n’aurait certainement pas pris cette dimension transfrontalière.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Field Protocol
    Annex 1: Field protocol Annex 1-Table 1: Fish data Fish data Date (dd/mm/yyyy) Site code Sampling method Site name Sampling location Name of watercourse Main river region XY co-ordinates GPS co-ordinates Longitude Transect length [m] Latitude Fished area [m2] Altitude[m] Wetted width [m] Fish data Fish species number of specimen number of specimen length ≤150 mm length >150 mm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Annex 1-Table 2: Abiotic and method data Reference fields Site code Date dd/mm/yyyy Site name Name of watercourse or River name River region XY co-ordinates or longitude, latitude GPS co-ordinates Altitude m Sampling location Main channel/Backwaters/Mixed Sampling method Boat/Wading Fished area m2 Wetted width m Abiotic variables Altitude m Lakes upstream affecting Yes / No the site Distance from source km Flow regime Permanent / Summer dry/Winter dry/Intermittent Geomophology Naturally constrained no modification/ Braided/Sinuous/Meand regular/Meand tortuous Former floodplain No/Small/Medium/Large/Some waterbodies remaining/ Water source type Glacial/Nival/Pluvial/Groundwater Former sediment size Organic/Silt/Sand/ Gravel-Pebble-Cobble/Boulder-Rock Upstream drainage area km2 Distance from source km River slope m/km (‰) Mean air temperature Celsius (°C) Annex 1-Table 3: Human impact data (optional) Site code hChemical data Name watercourse Oxygen (mg/l or % saturation) XYZ co-ordinates or X:……………………(N) Conductivity (mS/cm) longitude latitude altitude Y:……………………(E) Z :…………………….m
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Convention Relative À La Conservation De La Vie Sauvage Et Du Milieu Naturel De L'europe
    European Treaty Series - No. 104 Série des traités européens – n° 104 Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Convention relative à la conservation de la vie sauvage et du milieu naturel de l'Europe Bern/Berne, 19.IX.1979 Appendix II – STRICTLY PROTECTED FAUNA SPECIES Annexe II – ESPÈCES DE FAUNE STRICTEMENT PROTÉGÉES (*) (Med.) = in the Mediterranean/en Méditerranée VERTEBRATES/VERTÉBRÉS Mammals/Mammifères Birds/Oiseaux Reptiles Amphibians/Amphibiens Fish/Poissons INVERTEBRATES/INVERTÉBRÉS Arthropods/Arthropodes Molluscs/Mollusques Echinoderms/Échinodermes Cnidarians/Cnidaires Sponges/Éponges Notes to Appendix II / Notes à l'annexe II _____ (*) Status in force since 1 March 2002. Appendices are regularly revised by the Standing Committee. Etat en vigueur depuis le 1er mars 2002. Les annexes sont régulièrement révisées par le Comité permanent. ETS/STE 104 – Bern Convention / Convention de Berne (Appendix/Annexe II), 19.IX.1979 __________________________________________________________________________________ VERTEBRATES/VERTÉBRÉS Mammals/Mammifères INSECTIVORA Erinaceidae * Atelerix algirus (Erinaceus algirus) Soricidae * Crocidura suaveolens ariadne (Crodidura ariadne) * Crocidura russula cypria (Crocidura cypria) Crocidura canariensis Talpidae Desmana moschata Galemys pyrenaicus (Desmana pyrenaica) MICROCHIROPTERA all species except Pipistrellus pipistrellus toutes les espèces à l'exception de Pipistrellus pipistrellus RODENTIA Sciuridae Pteromys volans (Sciuropterus russicus) Sciurus anomalus
    [Show full text]
  • One-Locus-Several-Primers
    Received: 29 August 2018 | Revised: 19 February 2019 | Accepted: 25 February 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5063 ORIGINAL RESEARCH One‐locus‐several‐primers: A strategy to improve the taxonomic and haplotypic coverage in diet metabarcoding studies Emmanuel Corse1,2 | Christelle Tougard3 | Gaït Archambaud‐Suard4 | Jean‐François Agnèse3 | Françoise D. Messu Mandeng5 | Charles F. Bilong Bilong5 | David Duneau6 | Lucie Zinger7 | Rémi Chappaz4 | Charles C.Y. Xu8 | Emese Meglécz1 | Vincent Dubut1 1Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France 2Agence de Recherche pour la Biodiversité à la Réunion (ARBRE), Saint‐Leu, La Réunion, France 3ISEM, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France 4Irstea, Aix Marseille Univ, RECOVER, Aix‐en‐Provence, France 5Laboratory of Parasitology and Ecology, Departement of Animal Biology and Physiology, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon 6Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, CNRS, ENSFEA, EDB (Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique), Toulouse, France 7Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, PSL Research University, Paris, France 8Redpath Museum and Department of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada Correspondence Emmanuel Corse and Vincent Dubut, Abstract Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Aix In diet metabarcoding analyses, insufficient taxonomic coverage of PCR primer sets Marseille Univ, Marseille, France. Emails: [email protected] (EC); generates false negatives that may dramatically distort biodiversity estimates. In this [email protected] (VD) paper, we investigated the taxonomic coverage and complementarity of three cy‐ Funding information tochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) primer sets based on in silico analyses and Electricité de France (EDF); Agence we conducted an in vivo evaluation using fecal and spider web samples from differ‐ Française pour la Biodiversité (AFB); Syndicat Mixte d'Aménagement du Val ent invertivores, environments, and geographic locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Zingel Streber): Implications for Conservation
    Erschienen in: Aquatic Conservation : Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems ; 28 (2018), 3. - S. 587-599 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2878 River damming drives population fragmentation and habitat loss of the threatened Danube streber (Zingel streber): Implications for conservation Alexander Brinker1,2 | Christoph Chucholl3 | Jasminca Behrmann‐Godel2 | Michaela Matzinger4 | Timo Basen1 | Jan Baer1 1 Fisheries Research Station of Baden‐Württemberg, Langenargen, Germany Abstract ‐ 2 University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany 1. The Danube streber, Zingel streber, is a threatened and data deficient percid fish endemic to 3 EcoSurv, Schnaitsee, Germany the Danube catchment. The study provides the first data on distribution, life history, and ‐ 4 Office of the State Government of Upper genetic structure of the species at the upstream limit of its historic distribution (south western Austria, Linz, Austria Germany). Correspondence 2. A 3‐year survey effort with 143 fishing events identified several small, fragmentary popula- Alexander Brinker, Fisheries Research Station tions covering only 7% of the historical range of the species. Census population sizes (N )of of Baden‐Württemberg, Argenweg 50/1, c 88085 Langenargen, Germany. these subpopulations were estimated from mark–recapture data at <200 individuals. Effective Email: [email protected] population sizes (Ne), calculated from genetic data (microsatellite genotyping), were much Funding information smaller still, at <15 individuals, resulting in an Nc/Ne ratio of <0.25, strongly indicating that Fischereiabgabe Baden‐Württemberg populations are seriously affected by genetic drift and inbreeding, and are thus facing a severe extinction risk. 3. Life‐history parameters recorded during the study indicate a rapid life cycle, with both sexes probably attaining sexual maturity at the age of 1 year or older.
    [Show full text]
  • Faisabilité De L'élevage De L'apron Du Rhône (Zingel Asper, L.) À Des Fins
    Faisabilité de l’élevage de l’apron du Rhône (Zingel asper, L.) à des fins de rempoissonnement de soutien de la population du Doubs Suisse Etude préliminaire mars 2012 Environnement et sciences aquatiques BP 1767, CH‐2001 Neuchâtel Tél.:032 724 72 62 / Fax.: 032 835 30 78 www.netaquarius.ch Auteur(s) du rapport : Mandant : Dernière modification : AQUARIUS : Blaise Zaugg & République et Neuchâtel, le 13 mars 2012 Jérôme Plomb canton du Jura : ENV Office de l’environnement (ENV) Faisabilité de l’élevage de l’apron du Rhône (Zingel asper) à des fins de rempoissonnement de soutien de la population du Doubs Suisse – Etude préliminaire Table des matières 1. INTRODUCTION ‐ CADRE ................................................................................................................... 2 2. SUIVI DE L’APRON DU RHONE SUR LA BOUCLE JURASSIENNE DU DOUBS ....................................................... 3 3. GENETIQUE DE L’APRON DU RHONE .................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Différenciations à l’échelle des bassins du Rhône .................................................................................. 4 3.2 Evaluation de la fragmentation et de l’érosion génétique ..................................................................... 6 3.3 Echantillonnage nécessaire pour une étude génétique .......................................................................... 7 4. ELEVAGE DE L’APRON DU RHONE .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • D2.1 Classification Map of Running Waters Considering Fish Community
    AMBER Project - H2020 - Grant Agreement #689682 Topic: Adaptive Management of Barriers in European Rivers D5.6: Plan on Exploitation and Dissemination of Results July, 2016 Author: World Fish Migration Foundation D2.1 Classification map of running waters considering fish community structure and barrier impacts This is version 2.0 D2.1 `Classification map of running waters considering fish community structure and barrier impacts .This document is a deliverable of the AMBER project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme for under Grant Agreement (GA) #689682. D2.1: Classification map of running waters considering fish community structure and barrier impacts. April, 2018. EU Horizon 2020 Project: AMBER #689682 History of changes Version Date Changes Pages 1.0 03 Jan 2018 2.0 18 April 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinion stated in this report reflects the opinion of the authors and not the opinion of the European Commission. All intellectual property rights are owned by the AMBER consortium members and are protected by the applicable laws. Except where otherwise specified, all document contents are: “©AMBER Project - All rights reserved”. Reproduction is not authorized without prior written agreement. The commercial use of any information contained in this document may require a license from the owner of that information. All AMBER consortium members are also committed to publish accurate and up to date information and take the greatest care to do so. However, the AMBER consortium members cannot accept liability for any inaccuracies or omissions nor do they accept liability for any direct, indirect, special, consequential or other losses or damages of any kind arising out of the use of this information.
    [Show full text]
  • Wkcofibyc 2021
    WORKSHOP ON FISH OF CONSERVATION AND BYCATCH RELEVANCE (WKCOFIBYC; outputs from 2020 meeting) VOLUME 3 | ISSUE 57 ICES SCIENTIFIC REPORTS RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES DU CIEM ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] ISSN number: 2618-1371 This document has been produced under the auspices of an ICES Expert Group or Committee. The contents therein do not necessarily represent the view of the Council. © 2021 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). For citation of datasets or conditions for use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to ICES data policy. ICES Scientific Reports Volume 3 | Issue 57 WORKSHOP ON FISH OF CONSERVATION AND BYCATCH RELEVANCE (WKCOFIBYC) Recommended format for purpose of citation: ICES. 2021. Workshop on Fish of Conservation and Bycatch Relevance (WKCOFIBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 3:57. 125 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8194 Editors Maurice Clarke Authors Sara Bonanomi • Archontia Chatzispyrou • Maurice Clarke • Bram Couperus • Jim Ellis • Ruth Fernández • Ailbhe Kavanagh • Allen Kingston • Vasiliki Kousteni • Evgenia Lefkaditou • Henn Ojaveer Wolfgang Nikolaus Probst •
    [Show full text]
  • Zingel Asper (L., 1758) 1158 L’Apron Du Rhône Poissons, Perciformes, Percidés
    Poissons Zingel asper (L., 1758) 1158 L’Apron du Rhône Poissons, Perciformes, Percidés Le genre Zingel appartient à la sous-famille des Luciopercinae qui diffère des Percinae (Grémille, Gymnocephalus cernua, Perche, Perca fluviatilis) par un os interhémal antérieur pas plus large que les os postérieurs, des épines anales faibles, la ligne latérale prolongée sur la caudale, les deux dorsales séparées. La tribu des Romanichthyini (Aprons) regroupe deux genres et quatre petites espèces nettement benthiques, sans vessie gazeuse ni os prédorsal, bien distincts des Luciopercini (Sandre, Stizostedion lucioperca). Description de l’espèce Les géniteurs, âgés de 3 à 5 ans et mesurant 11 à 20 cm, se ren- dent avant février vers les frayères et sont de retour vers mai, On identifie sans peine Zingel asper par son aspect singulier : après la ponte qui se déroule en mars, dans des biotopes mal - corps fusiforme, la moitié antérieure ramassée et aplatie ven- connus (seule citation : la Durance à Monetier Allemont) sur des tralement, puis cylindrique après l’anus ; - grosse tête, bouche en croissant sous un museau arrondi ; pierres ou de la végétation des eaux fraîches et peu profondes. - deux narines frangées contiguës ; La fécondité est estimée à 5 000-6 000 ovules par femelle. Les - des petites dents mousses existent sur les mâchoires, le vomer œufs de 2,2 mm de diamètre sont blanc gris, translucides, avec et l’os palatin ; un globule lipidique. Ils adhèrent fortement. En captivité, on - opercule en pointe, préopercule dentelé ; observe plutôt des pontes non enfouies sur blocs et sable chez - deux épines operculaires inégales, des tubercules sur les arcs trois espèces de cette tribu.
    [Show full text]